LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.  
November 8, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Conservatives Descend on Capitol for 'House Call' Protest

Keep the Government Out of the News Business

Steve Fraser on the Crisis of Capitalism

Unemployment Breaks the 10% Barrier

'Left, Right & Center': GOP Scores; Unemployment Up; Fort Hood Fallout

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * Kucinich: Why I Voted No

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar
One Minute to Midnight

One Minute to Midnight

By Michael Dobbs
$19.11

Diary of a Bad Year

Diary of a Bad Year

By J. M. Coetzee
$16.47

more items

 
Reports

China’s Sins in the Spotlight

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Aug 7, 2008

By Eugene Robinson

    Bring on the Olympics. Please. When Paris Hilton dominates the presidential campaign for a whole week, even spelling out a plan for achieving energy independence, it is sooooo time for a break.

    There will be no respite, however, from the obligation to think hard about choices and consequences—no hiatus from having to ponder America’s place in the world and its prospects for the young century. The spectacle in Beijing promises to be, well, spectacular—but in the sense of the word that encompasses both the exhilarating and the horrifying.

    On proud display will be China’s explosive economic growth, which has lifted more people out of poverty in less time than any such burst of development in history. Much less visible, Chinese authorities hope, will be the shameful political repression that continues to deny basic rights and freedoms to China’s 1.3 billion citizens.

    I should make clear that I’m glad the Olympics are being held in China, because I’ve always believed the way to deal with repressive governments is engagement, not isolation. China’s economic miracle never could have happened if the Chinese leadership didn’t allow personal freedoms that would have been unimaginable in the days of Mao jackets and Little Red Books. These games, and the intense spotlight they focus on the host country, may ultimately spur further reforms.

    We all should acknowledge, though, that nothing of the sort has happened yet. According to Human Rights Watch, the run-up to the games “has been marred by a well-documented surge in violations of the rights of free expression and association, as well as media freedom. In addition, abuses of migrant construction workers who were pivotal to Beijing’s infrastructure improvements have increased, as have evictions of Beijing residents whose homes were demolished to make way for that infrastructure.”

Advertisement

    Amnesty International agrees, reporting that a “crackdown on human rights defenders, journalists and lawyers has intensified because Beijing is hosting the Olympics. The authorities have stepped up repression of dissident voices in their efforts to present an image of ‘stability’ and ‘harmony’ to the outside world.”

    Stopping in Thailand on his way to Beijing, President Bush grappled with the contradiction inherent in the fact that holding the Olympics in China has, arguably and perhaps for the short term, made the human rights situation worse.

    “America stands in firm opposition to China’s detention of political dissidents and human rights advocates and religious activists,” he said. “We press for openness and justice not to impose our beliefs, but to allow the Chinese people to express theirs.”

    Bush added, “Change in China will arrive on its own terms and in keeping with its own history and its own traditions. Yet change will arrive.”

    I think he’s right, but I’m not as sure as I once was. The Chinese government has been skillful in encouraging economic growth while also squelching political freedom. As I watch the Olympics, I’ll be wondering whether the Chinese model of authoritarian capitalism will prove to be durable—and, if so, how we’ll come to look back on these games.

    During the next two weeks of pageantry and competition, I’ll also be paying attention—as far as possible, through the television screen—to the Beijing sky. Will there be days of actual blue? Or is whitish-bluish gray about the best we can hope for? And, more important than the color of the air, will it be breathable?

    Beijing’s smog may prove uniquely effective in focusing attention on the kinds of environmental choices the world now faces. China’s economic boom has been quite literally breathtaking.

    Chinese authorities knew the dirty air was a problem—the world’s best athletes can hardly be expected to perform at their peak if they’re breathing factory smoke and tailpipe exhaust—so officials did everything they could to clean it up. Beginning several years ago, they moved some polluting factories to other parts of the country. In recent days they have imposed driving restrictions. If a rain shower is needed to clear the air, officials will attempt to generate one by seeding clouds. 

    According to reports from Beijing, though, the effect of any of these measures is hard to quantify. Ignoring the environmental implications of decades of rapid development has created a situation unlikely to respond to quick fixes. My guess is that watching the Olympics will give me, and perhaps others, a new appreciation of what environmentalists mean when they talk about the world we’re leaving for our grandchildren.
   
    Eugene Robinson’s e-mail address is eugenerobinson(at)washpost.com.
   
    © 2008, Washington Post Writers Group


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By BruSays, August 11, 2008 at 2:32 pm #

Big B…I agree with everything you say except for the last line, “We didn’t give a shit 100 years ago, why should they now?”

They should give a shit now because we were stupid about these things 100 years ago. A hundred years ago it was all about man conquering nature. We’ve since learned that nobody conquers nature and that the world’s resources are to be cared for, not raped.

The problem is there’s a warning message to be sent but we’re not the ones to send it. With something like 6% fo the world’s population we consume 25% of its resources.

Report this

By SamSnedegar, August 11, 2008 at 7:48 am #

We have met the enemy, and he is us.—-Walt Kelly (in the Pogo papers)

Report this

By samosamo, August 10, 2008 at 3:20 am #

Eugene Robinson

Just what is this cribity crue? You want to talk violations of human rights big boy just turn your encrusted eyes right here at the NOT so good USofA. We are the instigators, the intitators the out right undeniable producer of human righs violations. Why the hell are you picking on china as if they are the problem. WE ARE THE PROBLEM!!!. We didn’t even have to learn from china that doesn’t have a great record for human kindness, but boy howdy have we ever expanded on it and brought it down to such a fine art that people like you ignore US’s violation of human rights WORLD WIDE as a sort of necessary evil just to turn the attention to china record. Your total avoidance of the urgent need to clean up our act about makes you part of the conservative media control agendas. Go stand in front of a chinese tank.

Report this

By Tony Wicher, August 9, 2008 at 12:53 pm #

My view is that the Olympics is the worst possible place for any kind of political protest.  We have to understand the original meaning and purpose of the Olympics at the time of the ancient Greeks, which ought to be as true today. It was, and ought still to be, an occasion for people to PUT ASIDE their political, ideological and religious differences to celebrate their common humanity. That is the only thing that makes it worthwhile. No matter how vile a government may be, the Olympics is the wrong place to protest against it.

Report this

By Tony Wicher, August 9, 2008 at 12:45 pm #

By Big B, August 9 at 8:32 am #

We didn’t give a shit 100 years ago, why should they now?
——————————————————————————-Nobody gave a shit 100 years ago. Now we all have to give a shit, including China.

Report this

By Big B, August 9, 2008 at 12:32 pm #

I was born and raised in the Pittsburgh area. Upon reflection, China is us (just 100 years ago). We raped the counryside, polluted the air and water, and poisoned countless citizens, all in the name of progress. The problem is that the earth barely survived our industrial revolution. I don’t think it can stomach China’s too. Not to mention India’s and Southeast Asia’s. But the US has always done as it pleases, claiming the right of conquerer over conquered, even when dealing with economic expansion and the debasement of our natural resources. Why are we shocked that the emerging economys of the East have thumbed their noses at our half-hearted warnings of global ecologic disaster?
We didn’t give a shit 100 years ago, why should they now?

Report this

By tres, August 9, 2008 at 3:25 am #

and dump the pollutions in China, and you are bitching about your new appreciation of environmentalists.

Washington Post, mouth piece of evils

Report this

By BruSays, August 8, 2008 at 6:26 pm #

Spot on, jackpine savage.

Over half the products we “import” from China aren’t even imports - they’re products U.S. corporations are manufacturing in China and shipping back to ourselves because Chinese labor is cheaper and their environmental controls are either limited or absent.

We love our Barbie Dolls (Mattel, Inc. based California), Mr. Potato Heads (Hasbro - Rhode Island), Dell computers (Texas), Kirkland pet food (Costco -  Washington) and Nike running shoes (Oregon) in large part because their price is right. WalMart or Costco or K-Mart always sees to that, don’t they? Of course they do, because every one of these “quality” brand names manufactures all or portions of those products in China.

And this is China’s fault? Sorry shoppers. It’s OUR fault. To save a buck, we’ve granted U.S. corporations tax incentives and lowered tariffs so they can manufacture their products in China where there’s no minimum wage, limited health care provisions, longer work hours, and negligible environmental controls.

Let’s look at that again: We blame the Chinese because OUR politicians whom WE’VE voted in have granted OUR corporations incentives to out-source OUR jobs? Doesn’t compute on my Dell!

Report this

By swarming21, August 8, 2008 at 3:18 pm #

How come when the US hosts the Olympics no one is allowed to highlight US involvement in war crimes, our commitment to producing more greenhouse gasses, and our human rights violations? Those who live in glass houses should not throw stones.

Report this

By Cran Berry, August 8, 2008 at 11:23 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Let’s stop bashing China and talk about U.S. prisons and prisoners, about the growing disparity between rich and poor, about the lack of universal health care in the richest country in the world, about the immense U.S. war (not defense)  budget, about political corruption, the domination of government by large corporations . . . .

Report this

By Jim Yell, August 8, 2008 at 9:49 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

It is interesting the amount of support that Republicans give to the Chinese Government. Of course their outrageous profits rest largely upon sacrificing jobs in America to avoid the true cost of production. That wonderful Communist state with a controlled labor market, no environmental controls that are worth mentioning. No government standards to interfer with profits. Isn’t it odd this marriage between Captilism and Communism, but then there is little Communism in China, just a long unbroken record of corrupt and disgusting goons in power. It isn’t hard to see how much the Republicans and Corporate America admires and promotes the very same type of bad governmental behavior in our own country.

Well if we let them get away with it, than we deserve it.

Report this

By david, August 8, 2008 at 9:26 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Why do I read Truthdig. 3 articles in one day bashing China. And this one saying Bush isn’t bashing them enough. This site is to the right of Bush!

Report this

By jackpine savage, August 8, 2008 at 9:06 am #

I’m so tired of all the bitching about China.  We set the stage for most of the issues that we complain about.  How much of the pollution was generated by the manufacture of consumer goods for the US and European markets? (And how much of it was created at the behest of US corporations, owned by US shareholders, because labor was almost free and there were no environmental controls?)

We made China MFN before there were any significant political/social reforms.  We lobbied for China to join the WTO before said reforms.  I know, i know, we aren’t supposed to talk about these issues on “progressive” web sites because Clinton pushed hard for these things…after collecting campaign contributions from Chinese government conduits…but there it is.

China is our model of “development” taken to its logical conclusion.  Dr. Frankenstein has no right to complain about the actions of his monster.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
Click here to learn more about Truthdig
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
Chrome Bag - Free Shipping
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.