![]() |
|
| |
|
His Drilling Plan Is Full of HolesPosted on Aug 6, 2008By Joe Conason Touring America’s oil rigs and nuclear plants, John McCain sometimes sounds as if he’ll produce enough wind to power the nation all by himself. So strongly does his current rhetoric smell of methane—the gas emanating from manure—that he might even qualify for an alternative energy tax incentive. The former straight talker, who once could not help but tell the truth, has found the voice of the demagogue within. As McCain seeks to exploit public anger over the price of gasoline, first with his dubious “gas tax holiday” and now with his campaign for offshore oil drilling, the thoughtful legislator who defied his own party on global warming and Alaskan oil leasing has been replaced by that much more familiar congressional figure—a rented mouthpiece for the energy industry. Not surprisingly, this new McCain is not quite as accessible to the press as the earlier version, partly because he resents the media attention devoted to his Democratic opponent and partly because he no longer is so eager to answer every question a reporter might pose. He prefers to listen to the cheers of eager boobs who believe him when he says, “We’re not going to pay $4 a gallon for gas because we are going to drill here, and we are going to drill now!” But should he ever stop yelling and start thinking again, there will be plenty of questions awaiting him, including these: Senator, if you truly think we should be doing “all of the above” to reduce our dependence on foreign oil, why have you voted against every recent congressional measure to encourage renewable energy sources? If you still worry about the effects of climate change, then why do you now emphasize drilling for additional oil offshore rather than energy sources that don’t create greenhouse gases? And why do you continue to talk about “clean coal,” which doesn’t actually exist? Why do you say that offshore drilling will cut gasoline prices when the Energy Information Administration predicts that will not happen for a decade and will make little difference even then? According to your best estimate, when will “drilling here and drilling now” reduce the price of gasoline in the United States? Please explain why you no longer believe in the data supplied by the Energy Information Administration, which you asked to provide the economic analysis for the climate-change bill that you co-sponsored with Sen. Joseph Lieberman. When you assure audiences that drilling offshore will produce more oil within a matter of months, as you did in Bakersfield, Calif., last week, are you relying on sources other than the Energy Information Administration? Please identify the person or persons who told you that the oil industry can produce more petroleum within the next several months if we start offshore leasing today. Did you learn of that miraculous capacity from one of the many oil company lobbyists who have advised and raised money for your campaign? When you said that there was no significant oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico even during Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, were you aware that at least 7 million gallons were spilled as a result of Katrina? How much oil must leak from a damaged offshore rig or barge before you would consider the spillage to be “significant”? By the way, where will all that new offshore drilling occur if the states of Florida and California continue to oppose offshore leasing, as their governors have vowed to do? Do you still support the right of those states to prevent drilling in their coastal waters, as you promised last year? Doesn’t that promise conflict with your claim that offshore wells will produce enough new oil to lower gasoline prices? Finally, what is so funny about checking tire pressure to save energy? Are you aware that auto and tire maintenance—like other conservation and efficiency measure—can save far more oil than offshore leasing will ever produce? Did you know that Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has urged the people of California to pump up their tires? Is it really prudent to mock him? Joe Conason writes for The New York Observer. © 2008 Creators Syndicate Inc. Previous item: Playing the Economic Card Next item: China Lives Up to Low Expectations Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment
|
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved. |
By cann4ing, August 15, 2008 at 5:00 pm #
M.A.? I would have flunked you from my class, buddy.
Report thisBy cann4ing, August 14, 2008 at 9:22 pm #
Rus, I note that you did not deny my suspicion that your education does not go beyond high school. (At times I have wondered whether it even goes that far). I have no doubt that you never served in the military, let alone experienced combat (My resume includes the fact that I am also a Vietnam Vet).
You project onto others your own “lack of judgment”—a lack of judgment that arises from profound ignorance and is the product of the having been duped over a life time by the likes of comedian Rush Limbaugh or, in the words of Keith Olbermann, “Billo the Clown from Fixed Noise,” or simply because you lack the intellectual capacity to understand how to look for and ferret out the facts from the constant white noise bombarding you from the right-wing echo chamber.
Frankly, I don’t enjoy pounding away at a lesser mind, but since you have persisted in your nonsense and irrational attacks on everyone who is not taken in by your talking points drivel, I felt the time has come for someone to tell you like it is. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, kid, but you don’t have a clue.
Report thisBy cann4ing, August 13, 2008 at 8:30 pm #
Rus, I hold both undergraduate and graduate degrees in political science (with honors). I graduated from a fully accredited law school 4th in a class of 277; published a law review article on executive privilege, served as a student editor of that law review, successfully practiced law for 31 years, including numerous appellate court appearances, served as an arbitrator, a judge pro tem and lectured at continuing education of the bar seminars, and you, whom I suspect has at best a high school education, are going to presume to lecture me on the difference between fact and opinion?
Report thisBy cann4ing, August 13, 2008 at 8:12 pm #
r-r-r-rus. Now you’re stuttering even in print.
Report thisBy ocjim, August 13, 2008 at 11:47 am #
John McCain is not only a fraud he is a hypocrite. Like Bush and Cheney, he cares nothing about an energy policy. If people would watch his actions and then listen to his words that becomes patently obvious.
On July 30, the Senate was voting for the eighth time in the past year on a broad, vitally important bill S. 3335 that would have extended the investment tax credits for installing solar energy and the production tax credits for building wind turbines and other energy-efficiency systems.
Both the wind and solar industries depend on these credits which expire in December to scale their businesses and become competitive with coal, oil and natural gas. Unlike offshore drilling, these credits could have an immediate impact on Americas energy profile.
Senator McCain did not show up for the crucial vote on July 30, and the renewable energy bill was defeated for the eighth time. In fact, John McCain has a perfect record on this renewable energy legislation. He has missed all eight votes over the last year which effectively counts as a no vote each time. Once, he was even in the Senate and wouldnt leave his office to vote.
This is the fraud and hypocrite who is passing himself off as one who cares about our future.
Report thisBy cann4ing, August 13, 2008 at 10:40 am #
How typical these neocons are of right wing posters. As Bill Moyers once observed, the quickest way to be denounced as sheltering a liberal bias is to hit them with the facts. Of course, being Orwellian trolls, they cannot accept any source unless it is an “official source,” as if the documents emanating from our political branches of government are the only version of reality one may accept. (And we just know that the Bush administration would never dream of cooking the books). All else, regardless of the facts upon which it is based, is mere “opinion” to be discarded like yesterday’s trash.
How sad! How blind! How stupid!
Report thisBy cann4ing, August 12, 2008 at 5:26 pm #
The challenge is still out there, Rowman & JBlack—negate a single “fact” I posted on 8/10 at 7:29 a.m. And they are indeed facts, JBlack. The question of whether the gap between rich and poor is the greatest since 1929 is a fact, not an opinion. The question of whether we are facing the greatest number of home foreclosures since the Great Depression is a fact, not an opinion. The question of whether the percentage of Americans in a negative savings status is the highest since the Great Depression is a fact, not an opinion. The question of whether America is experiencing the largest number of bank failures since the Great Depression is a fact, not an opinion.
Here’s a couple of added facts about the growing gap between rich and poor.
Thirty years ago, at $1.3 million, the average annual CEO compensation was 39 times that of the average worker. Today, at $37.5 million, it is over a thousand times that of the average worker, who experienced a ten percent loss of real wages during the same thirty years. During the past twenty-five years the number of Americans below the poverty line swelled from 21 million to 33 million. 18,000 Americans die each year simply because they cannot afford to purchase health insurance.
By 1999, the net worth of just three individuals, Bill Gates, Paul Allen and Warren Buffet, was larger than the gross domestic product of the worlds 41 poorest nations and their 550 million people.
Sources: Bill Moyers, “Moyers on America;” Eduardo Parker, “After Years of Growth, What About Workers’ Share?” New York Times, 10/15/06; Jim Hightower, “Thieves in High Places”; Kevin Phillips, “Wealth & Democracy;” Center for Disease Control.
Report thisBy cann4ing, August 12, 2008 at 6:58 am #
Yeah, real original, JBlack. Don’t trouble yourself with all those dire statistics establishing that Republicans have driven the American economic bus to the edge of a ditch as deep as the Grand Canyon. The U.S. is simply suffering from a “mental recession.” (JBlack = Phil Gramm?) I’ll just take a drive down to skid row and give a speech to the growing ranks of homeless people and tell them, don’t worry, be happy! That will solve everything.
Report thisBy cann4ing, August 10, 2008 at 3:29 pm #
rowman, list a single “fact” set forth in my last post which is less than accurate. Can’t do it, can you. Know why? Because they are truths that are simply inconvenient to those, like you, who have bought into Republican propaganda.
Report thisBy rowman, August 10, 2008 at 8:32 am #
cann4ing We have a fascist government
I agree that the Democrats and Republicans have transferred us from a great nation of Freedom to the nation of Laws we have today. The only purpose of these laws is to control and suppress you, the citizen.
So then, how in the hell can you sit here and push propaganda in support of the Democratic Party?
They are just as guilty and just as much of the problem. There is NO difference between these two parties, they are one. The DemoPublican Party.
Report thisBy cann4ing, August 10, 2008 at 7:29 am #
Alarmist? Largest gap between rich and poor since 1929. Largest number of home foreclosures since the Great Depression. Largest percentage of citizens with negative savings since the Great Depression. Largest federal deficit in our nation’s history fueled by a permanent warfare mentality and an imperial conquest of a foreign nation that had never attacked us—a conquest that per Nobel Prize winning economist Joseph Stiglitz has already cost this nation three trillion dollars.
America today is lead by an exorbitantly wealthy elite which has shipped our entire manufacturing base overseas in search of the $2/day laborer as the remnants of American labor or either out of work or working for below-poverty wages. We have a fascist government so perverted by corruption and power that it could stand idly by as tens of thousands of its citizens were left to sink or swim in a toxic soup of flood waters, petrochemicals and dead bodies (Katrina). It is a government which is so out of touch that it finds it necessary to spy on its own citizens, deny the right of habeas corpus, engage in torture and hide its own corrupt behavior behind an impenetrable veil of secrecy.
But the most monumental reason for concern is the existence of citizens like JBlack, who are so monumentally uninformed, that they actually think that we can bring gas prices down by handing more land and oil to the oil cartel to horde and divvy out as it pleases—citizens who think it is actually a good idea to elect a monumentally stupid and dishonest man like the guy Paris Hilton referred to as the “wrinkly, white haired old dude” who, even in his prime, could not parlay the good fortune of being the privileged son and grandson of powerfully placed admirals into anything better than finishing 894th in a class of 899—as compared to an opponent who, as the product of a broken home, parlayed a superior intellect and hard work into becoming the first African American editor of the prestigious Harvard Law Review, going on to graduate from that esteemed institution Magna Cum Laude before teaching constitutional law at the University of Chicago.
When I see citizens out there, like you JBlack, who are so monumentally stupid that they will buy into McSame’s BS, I shudder for the future of this nation.
Report thisBy frank67, August 9, 2008 at 1:04 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Bye bye John Sydney McBushCain. You’re history.
Report thisBy cann4ing, August 9, 2008 at 9:06 am #
Hmmmm, did it ever occur to you Sam that the oil cartel wants exclusive access to drilling but also the ability to limit supply to maintain price levels?
Also, in seeking new and more expensive ways to drill for more, aren’t you leaving off little things like global climate change and much cheaper, clean alternative energy sources—wind, solar, geothermal, wave.
Al Gore said it best. When you’re in a hole, you don’t keep digging.
Report thisBy SamSnedegar, August 9, 2008 at 8:19 am #
Graduate students have been working on cost effective ways to process Colorado oil shale for at least fifty years, and their problem has always been the cheap 20 dollar a barrel oil. At this point, ANY of the ideas put forward ought to work fine and get us all the oil we need for years to come with no dependence on foreign oil sources at all.
How long it would take us to get the new oil “in the pipeline” in quantity would depend on two major things: (1) commitment, and (2) when we get started. What I cannot understand is why we have not already started.
Report thisBy Blackspeare, August 8, 2008 at 11:37 am #
I just read that the GOP convention committee has hired additional “escort” services to be able to handle all participating attendees. At least we know that the Republican Party is in favor of “On Shore Drilling.”
Report thisBy cann4ing, August 8, 2008 at 8:20 am #
Consider Paul Krugman’s op-ed from today’s New York Times:
“Republicans, once hailed as the party of ideas, have become the party of stupid….The know-nothingism the insistence that there are simple, brute-force, instant-gratification answers to every problem, and that theres something effeminate and weak about anyone who suggests otherwise has become the core of Republican policy and political strategy. partys de facto slogan has become: ‘Real men dont think things through.’”
“In the case of oil, this takes the form of pretending that more drilling would produce fast relief at the gas pump. In fact, earlier this week Republicans in Congress actually claimed credit for the recent fall in oil prices: The market is responding to the fact that we are here talking, said Representative John Shadeggus, want Americans to move to the urban core, live in tenements, take light rail to their government jobs.
Is this political pitch too dumb to succeed? Dont count on it.
Krugman goes on to discuss the current poll numbers revealing how many Americans have been taken in by the drill-our-way to independence canard (69%) but to the large numbers who mistakenly believed we invaded Iraq to retaliate for 9/11 while any who dared to point out the not so subtle distinction between Osama and Saddam as America-hating, effite snobs, then adds:
“Lets also not forget that for years President Bush was the center of a cult of personality that lionized him as a real-world Forrest Gump, a simple man who prevails through his gut instincts and moral superiority. ‘Mr. Bush is the triumph of the seemingly average American man,’ declared Peggy Noonan, writing in The Wall Street Journal in 2004. ‘Hes not an intellectual. Intellectuals start all the trouble in the world.’”
Ever since they launched into Lloyd Benson for telling Dan Quayle, “Senator, you’re no John Kennedy,” Republicans have proclaimed it their birth right to place the dumbest MF they can find into the POTUS. In that, their current presumptive nominee, the guy Paris Hilton aptly dubbed “the wrinkly, white-haired old dude” does not disappoint. The son and grandson of powerfully placed admirals whom privilege afforded a place in the Naval Academy where he finished 894th in a class of 899 is intellectually overmatched by an opponent who graduated Magna Cum Laude from the nation’s most prestigious law school—Harvard—before going on to teach constitutional law at the University of Chicago.
Thanks to a pliant corporate media, these “know nothings” are permitted to operate in a fact-free environment. Is it any wonder why we are teetering on catastrophic failure?
Report thisBy Ivan Hentschel, August 7, 2008 at 5:32 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
No one, and I do mean, no one, is telling even half the truth about anything related to our energy woes, and even less about oil in particular.McCain is simply hopeless and Obama is not much better. Nobody knows where the oil come from, who owns it, where it goes or how it can and might be refined. Off shore drilling and ANWR are no answers at all, the demand for oil in China and India will drive everything, and simple capitalism run amok (that’s called greed)has captured the oil companies. Our overpaid government lackies support this foolishness and we can trust no one. I’m just sick to death of hearing all the bald-faced lies. It’s not a debate, it’s a giant game of liar’s poker.
Report thisBy Big B, August 7, 2008 at 5:20 pm #
Say what you will about the old war horse (senile, out of touch, bumbling old codger) He’s catching up in the poles (Obama should be at least 20 points up by now) by being nothing but his dimwitted self. Just wait until after the RNC convention, when his cronies run the neocon playbook and a bitter frightened citizenry elect his wrinkled ass.
Report thisThink I’m wrong? Anybody remember 2000 or 2004.
Keep these facts in mind as November approaches,
a majority of Americans still think that Saddam planned 911, that torture is OK, that global warming is a left wing conspiracy, that Barack Obama is a muslim, and that Angels are watching over us.
Let’s hope they’re right about the last one, or we just might be FUBAR!
By Paolo, August 7, 2008 at 3:55 pm #
As a libertarian, I don’t have a dog in the fight between tweedle dee and tweedle dum. If someone put a gun to my head and forced me to choose between Obama and McCain, I’d go for Obama. But, as an outside observer, I have to say he could still manage to lose the election on his energy policy.
Imagine! Losing an election to the sitting president’s party, when the economy is in recession, and an unpopular war continues to drag on seemingly forever.
In my opinion, the Federal government has almost no constitutional role in “energy policy”, since this is not an enumerated power per Article 1, Section 8. Having sufficient energy is a matter of getting the government out of the way, and letting the market determine which sources of energy will work best.
The Democratic Party used to be the party of decentralized, local government, rather than the party of Washington Ueber Alles. Now, the D’s simply “me too” the R’s, agreeing that the President, like some sort of Il Duce, should have the power to determine what energy concerns will be allowed to succeed, and which to fail.
Report thisBy xyzaffair, August 7, 2008 at 1:41 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
McCain is offering a very simplistic and flawed approach to the energy crisis. He wants supporters to believe that increased domestic drilling is a panacea. Even disregarding problems due to “accidental” spills (has Prince William Sound, AK, fully recovered?) and global warming, there is is an insufficient domestic oil supply to make a significant difference. In 1994 the Alaska Pipeline surpassed 10 BILLION barrels of oil after 17 years of operation, but there was discussion of closing one of the four loading terminals because of decreased flow. Yet the Pipeline only provides about 6% of domestic consumption. By the way, can anyone verify Charles Krauthammer’s claim of 50 billion barrels in proven reserves in ANWR?
Report thisBy Brad Cole, August 7, 2008 at 1:34 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Dear Mr. Conason: Seven million gallons were not spilled. The actual total is approximately 750,000 gallons, more or less. You’re off by a factor of 10. I’m a big fan of yours, but in these times, we must be completely accurate in reporting facts to support our arguments. Three-quarters of a million gallons is bad enough, and fully supports your arguments about McCain and the Republicans.
Report thisBy Howard, August 7, 2008 at 12:29 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
I sometimes wonder why anyone would believe What John McCain says. he would say that hell was a icehouse if EzonMobile told him it was. then he would try to sell icepicks for 25 dollars,like he did tire pressure gages. one more thing I amtired of hearing about his War record.there must have been thousands of our men who were war prisoners.That does not set him out in my eyes.
Report thisBy luzmejor, August 7, 2008 at 11:13 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
No public utility should ever be privatized. These facilities are all paid for by the people and their profits should be used to control and maintain services for all.
The problems in our present economy prove that private energy companies are pirate companies.
Report thisBy Alan, August 7, 2008 at 9:56 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
A.P. 8 Aug. 08:
Report thisThe newly streamlined and highly focused (-;
McCain campaign rolled into Phoenix today on
a fleet of buses sporting the campaign banner
“Demagogues for Drilling”. McCain, stumbling,
then bumping into a symbolic oil drum, announced
his intention when elected to drill for oil
in national parks and if necessary under the
Potomac river. The enthralled crowd chanted
“Go! Go! Magoo!” as McCain stumbled about the stage,
finally to be led back to the bus by uniformed
Rove operatives.
By rowman, August 7, 2008 at 8:39 am #
Silly people. You will not get around the drilling. Get real.
You are totally dependent on oil, use it every day and have no intention of stopping anytime soon. Wind electricity is only reliable 10% of the time. Solar is most efficient right now at heating water and we are decades away from being able to use either as a replacement. Moore’s law does not apply.
We import most of our oil from Canada, have the largest Natural Gas reserves but we buy it from Canada also, sell portions of our oil to other nations and China is tapping the coastal oil by drilling of the coast of Cuba. We should be selling it to them and paying off our debt instead of giving it away.
You want to blame all of this on others when you are the problem so stop whining like a little spoiled brat. Pelosi has no clue how to fix this and is playing politics with your and my money while we pay for their auto fuel.
Drill we will and if you are against it, stop using any form of electricity or transportation that comes from oil or natural gas.
Report thisBy Purple Girl, August 7, 2008 at 8:38 am #
what was pointed out most aptly by a writer on Alternet- WE will not Own tht Oil, Exxon et al Will own the oil- so they can sell it to anyone they want, Highest bidders? Exxon et al have no obligation to reserve all that Oil for OUR consumption only.
Report thisSo regardless when or how much oil comes from Off shore drilling, or new leasing opportunities - Gov’t sold OUR rights to that national Resource off to the Corps LONG ago!
By skulz fontaine, August 7, 2008 at 5:41 am #
Drill more Amerikan oil so that oil can be planted on the global market! That’s where the real money is. Yup. Build more nuclear monstrosities and where oh where does Amerika store the nuclear waste? Wait a minute, Phoenix! Yup, there’s not much going on in Phoenix so, Amerika could store the nuclear waste there. Besides, McNuts doesn’t live in Phoenix.
Report thisYup, Amerika’s “war hero” has certainly got it going on. More “drilling” and more “nuclear power” and golly ‘we’re saved’! Phoenix is going to mostly suck with all those spent fuel rods laying hither and yon, but it’s Phoenix and maybe the Maricopa County Sheriff could get his ‘slave labor force’ to tidy up a snudge.
By hippy pam, August 7, 2008 at 4:42 am #
SOoo…....If we start drilling NOW….we will see the BENEFITS in 10+/- YEARS…Does “mccbush” plan on MULTIPLE TERMS OF OFFICE in order to see his “plan” thru???????And we KNOW HE READS PROMPTS-cuz he has “fuck*d” them up many times-Coul it be CUZ HE HAS “oldtimers/alzheimers”.........???????
Report thisBy VietnamVet, August 7, 2008 at 3:37 am #
No, he does not want to be placed in a situation of having to respond to those type questions. Besides, it won’t be on his script! Have you noticed that every time he gives a “speech” he is constantly looking down to “read” what he needs to say? And all those gaffs, like the “tire pressure” issue. That properly inflated tires saves gasoline is true and many of us have known it for YEARS and HE makes a joke as if it were not! And his idea of “taking on big oil” really means taking on their contributions to his floundering campaign! No, McCain does not want to confront those questions AT ALL!
Report thisBy Johngfd, August 6, 2008 at 9:54 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Seriously. It is No-Shock-Barack. No-Drama-Obama. He has an even hand. He is not rash. He thinks.
Educated. Brilliant. Inspirational. Calm. America is lucky that he will be our next President.
McCain…bottom 1% of his naval academy. NOw he is too old.
Report thisI am a brain researcher, and I can tell you that there are serious changes that occur in an elderly brain that negatively affect a person’s ability to make good decisions. The pre-frontal cortex rapidly deteriorates with old age, and the pre-frontal cortex is really important to our ability to resist out impulses. Teenagers don’t have developed neo-cortexes, and this is why they often make poor choices. Sometimes they aren’t able to stop their reflexive reactions. Would you give a teenager the RED BUTTON?