LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 25, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Three Questions Left Unanswered by Obama’s Counterterrorism Speech

How to Make a Million Dollars an Hour

Marching in Chicago: Resisting Rahm Emanuel’s Neoliberal Savagery

Colbert Slams PBS for Appeasing Koch Brothers

Corporate Tax Cheats by the Numbers

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * A Cooler Century? Wait and See
New York City’s Summers May Heat Up

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
A Call to Action
Act of Congress

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar
Engaging the Muslim World

Engaging the Muslim World

By Juan Cole
$11.47

more items

 
Reports

Syria Succeeds by Doing Nothing

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Aug 3, 2008

By Robert Fisk

Originally printed in The Independent.

President Bashar al-Assad is once more one of the “triple pillars” of the Middle East. We may not like that. George Bush may curse the day his invasion of Iraq helped to shore up the power of the Caliph of Damascus. But Mr Assad’s latest trip to Tehran—just three weeks after he helped to toast the overthrow of the King of France beside President Nicolas Sarkozy—seals his place in history. Without a shot being fired, Mr Assad has ensured anyone who wants anything in the Middle East has got to talk to Syria. He’s done nothing—and he’s won.

The Europeans like to think—or, at least, M. Sarkozy likes to think—Mr Assad was in Tehran to persuade President Ahmadinejad not to go nuclear. Even Sana, the official Syrian news agency, was almost frank about it. The purpose of the Assad visit was “to consult on the nuclear issue and the right of states to peaceful enrichment” and “exchange ideas aimed at clarifying Iran’s commitment to all international agreements”. Mr Assad was M. Sarkozy’s point-man.

The inevitable followed. President Ahmadinejad expressed his belief that only diplomacy could deliver us from the nuclear tangle, leaving us with Mr Assad’s statement to M. Sarkozy on 12 July. Asked if the Iranians were trying to develop a nuclear bomb, Mr Assad told the French President he had asked the Iranians this very question, they had replied in the negative and this was good enough for him.

What’s interesting about this is that Mr Assad probably believes it. Indeed, it may be true. Of all people, he knows about trust—or the lack of it—and his father’s main foreign policy achievement was probably maintaining Syria’s relations with Iran. In the face of every appeal to abandon Tehran, he refused. The younger Assad’s talks with Israel via Turkey suggested to the Washington commentariat that he may at last be abandoning Iran and the return of Golan was more powerful to Bashar al-Assad than Syria’s all-embracing role as the postman of Tehran. Not so.

Advertisement

For there was Mr Assad in Tehran this weekend, praising the mutual relationship between Iran and Syria and talking with Mr Ahmadinejad about the Israeli-US “conspiracy”. The Syrian-supported Hizbollah’s retrieval of living prisoners from Israel in return for the remains of two dead Israeli soldiers, was described by Mr Assad as “one of the achievements of the resistance”. Which, in a way, it was. For Hizbollah’s allies in the Lebanese government now have veto power over the cabinet majority, and Syria’s power has returned to Beirut without the cost of sending a single Syrian soldier.

In other words, Syria kept its cool. When the US invaded Iraq, the world wondered if its tanks would turn left to Damascus or right to Tehran. In fact, they lie still in the Iraqi desert, where US generals still variously accuse Iran and Syria of encouraging the insurgency against them. If Washington wants to leave Iraq, it can call Damascus for help.

And the real cost? The US will have to restore full relations with Syria. It will have to continue talks with Iran. It will have to thank Iran for its “help” in Iraq—most of the Iraqi government, after all, was nurtured in the Islamic Republic during the Iran-Iraq war in which the US took Saddam’s side. It will have to accept Iran is not making a nuclear bomb. And it will have to prevent Israel staging a bombing spectacular on Iran which will destroy every hope of US mediation. It will also have to produce a just Middle East peace. McCain or Obama, please note.

And the triple pillars? Well, one is Mr Assad, of course. The second is the crackpot Mr Ahmadinejad. And the third? It was once President Bush. Who will take his place? President Assad must have enjoyed his Iranian caviar.


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By Bukko in Australia, August 8, 2008 at 3:52 am Link to this comment

FWIW, here’s more Fisk, about watching the bloody death of a woman he was friends with. The man has seen SO MUCH horror. I’m a hospital nurse. I see people die from time to time. I don’t like it, but at least it’s in clean, controlled circumstances, where we try to make it as pain-free as possible. What Fisk has seen, in real life and on video, I don’t know how he hasn’t gone mad from it.

Report this

By Bukko in Australia, August 8, 2008 at 12:39 am Link to this comment

MEMB, glad to know that you’ve been reading Fisk. I had erroeously jumped to the conclusion that you were jumping to conclusions about him. What are the natural phenomena of ME societies that he is unable to accept? One of the things I like about him is that he’s willing to bash Bashir AND Barak (Ehud, not Obama) for the human rights horrors unleashed by their societies. He has the moral uprighteousness of the proper Englishman about him, but there’s nothing wrong with that (except for the fact that English-speaking societies have always TALKED a better game about human rights than they have PLAYED.)

Report this

By mrmb, August 7, 2008 at 9:57 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Bukko in Australia,

I have been reading Fisk’s articles and reports for close to 30 years. At first I was greatly impressed as he seemed a lone voice in the wilderness.

But as you know one over time, things slightly change. Fisk is not a bad man or a bad journalist in my estimation. However what ticks me off is that his inborn political and cultural biases show here and there and thats what ticks me off.

As a student of history he clearly understands what colonial, neo colonial and imeprialist / zionist domination of the ME have done to the people of the area and by extension to us. However he has a fixed reference point for the solution to the core social / political / economical problems of the ME and he is unable to understand or accept the homegrown natural phenomenons of various ME societies. For that is a great shortcoming of an accomplished western journalist.

He is well advised to continue on with an objective reporting of events without his pseudo intellectual analysis of political events that he seems to be having difficulty understanding or appreciating.

Report this

By Bukko in Australia, August 6, 2008 at 10:46 pm Link to this comment

MRMB, you’re quick to criticise Fisk, but have you read much of his writing? You seem to imagine that he’s some sort of Pommie imperialist. It’s simple to condemn a man because he fits into some mental stereotype you carry.

Fisk is actually quite pro-Arab, anti-Israeli, and anti-authoritarian when it comes to the murderous dictatorships in the Muslim countries. I would suggest reading his monumental book titled “The Great War for Civilsation”/ but it’s 1,200 pages long in paperback. Took me almost a year to plow through it (amidst the other books I was reading concurrently.) So read the review that I linked instead. Fisk is a notable guy who’s interviewed Osama bin Laden multiple times and has seen more blown-apart bodies on the killing fields of the Muslim world than anybody should have to witness.

Report this

By mrmb, August 5, 2008 at 3:36 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

France accused over Rwanda genocide
Tue, 05 Aug 2008 19:59:29 GMT

French soldiers on patrol passing by ethnic Hutu troops in 1994 French troops were directly involved in Rwanda’s 1994 genocide in which 800,000 people were massacred, Rwanda’s justice ministry says.

It named 33 senior French military and political figures including late president Francois Mitterrand (president from 1981 to 1995), two former prime ministers Dominique de Villepin and Edouard Balladur of direct involvement in the massacres from April to July 1994 and said they should be prosecuted.

Hutu militias slaughtered minority Tutsis and politically moderate Hutus.

The report threatened to further mar relations between the two countries, which severed diplomatic ties in November 2006.

France has refused to comment on the report and had previously denied any involvement. France has acknowledged making “mistakes” in Rwanda but denies any responsibility for the killing spree.

The French foreign ministry told the BBC it would only respond to the fresh allegations after reading the report, which was released on Tuesday afternoon.

Rwandan Justice Minister Tharcisse Karugarama, presenting the 500-page report in Kigali, said: “French forces directly assassinated Tutsis and Hutus accused of hiding Tutsis… French forces committed several rapes on Tutsi women.”

Karugarama said his country had no immediate plans to issue indictments, but the report “could be the basis for potential charges against individuals or the state.”

He added that it took more than two years for a special commission assigned with probing France’s involvement in the genocide.

The report further said that France was aware of the preparations for the genocide, contributed to planning the massacres and actively took part in the killing.

Elsewhere the statement said that considering the seriousness of the alleged crimes, the Rwandan government has urged the relevant authorities to bring the accused French politicians and military officials to justice

Report this

By nefertiti, August 5, 2008 at 2:07 pm Link to this comment

mrmb
I love your quote below , just love it . i think the same about Fisk when it comes to Lebanon and syria .

Quote : Mr. Fisk I suggest you go get drunk in Beirut and daydream of the colonial rule of Lebanon. Its over old man.

Report this

By mrmb, August 5, 2008 at 10:16 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Cyrena,

I was refering to the recent list of candidates. Actually Ron Paul is pretty decent:

1- He is clearly anti war and doesnt mince his words either.

2- He does not support the imperial project.

3- He does not advocate a military invasion, attack, or any acts of aggression on Iran or anyone else.

4- He supports trade, cultural exchanges, and other peaceful and humane norms of interactions between nations and states that would actually promote a lot of badly needed global harmony.

5- He clearly opposes interference in the internal afairs of other countries.

Eventhough he is in the republican party and i am no fan of the party and its leadership that doesnt mean we should not be able to put aside our feelings and see things the way they are.

When I look at his positions right through these last 8 years and I find consistency, clarity, courage, and integrity I find it hard to just brush him aside and denegrade his credentials just because he is a republican.

To a large extent I feel the same way about Kucinic.

Junna and Robbie,

Right on.

Report this

By Robbie, August 5, 2008 at 7:53 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Hopefully, Iran and Syria together can neutralize the genocide by Israel. That and that alone should be any peace loving person’s goal. Until Israel is gone completely and the people are put back on a boat and set adrift, the world, and especially the children, will never be safe.  The insanity of countries who support Israel, to their own destruction, demonstrates why we must get out of the ME and leave those people alone.

Report this

By Junna, August 4, 2008 at 11:17 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

President Ahmadinejad of Iran is not a crackpot. The article is good but I wish people would quit putting him down. He has worked hard to keep Iran from being invaded and he has the intelligence to keep ahead of those intent on ruining his country as well as keeping his economy going in spite of all the sanctions.He has been strong and determined and won’t back down while surrounded by warships and ememies on every side. He has spoken out adamantly on issues no one else will touch. Where else do we see this kind of courage today?

Report this

By cyrena, August 4, 2008 at 9:35 pm Link to this comment

Fadel,

Not to be a kill-joy or anything but remember Ayman Zawahiri is an MD as well. A pediatrician at that..requiring a whole lot more smarts than Dr. Ron Paul the republican congressmen. The only thing they have in common is their religious fundamentalism. Dr. Ron Paul doesn’t know how to diagnose anything, because he’s just an obstetrician. Most Obstetricians are Obstetricians ANY gynecologists, so they can in fact diagnose and treat women’s life threatening disorders. But, all he does is deliver babies, and try to get legislation banning birth control of any kind, not to mention overturning Roe v. Wade. Pretty much anybody can deliver babies. I’d rather have a midwife than that creep.

Sorry mrnb, if we need an MD for President, we can find one better than him. Maybe we should elect my brother-in-law. He’s pretty laid back…smart too. He’d be a great president, and he could set up for medicare to pay for all colonoscopies. (that’s his thing, he’s a gastroenterologist) Maybe if we started diagnosing and treating these assholes at the root of their problem, the political scene would be in better order.

Report this

By yellowbird2525, August 4, 2008 at 8:54 pm Link to this comment

i had heard that the US went to Suddam & talked him & weaponed him up & helped him overthrow Iran & set up the dictatorship of the Shah of Iran; now that that has been overthrown it was just a matter of time b/4 the USA went after them again; what is truly tragic & one reason media is censored so much is that the Iraqi’s said the set up there similar to USA & Corp’s is dictatorship & thousands of times worse than it was under Hussain & they wish he were alive again because while it was bad under him it is far far far worse under this set up; the “insurgents” are Iraqi’s fighting to be free of enslavement like the citizens of the USA to Corps & wealthy; no WMD, no links at all with Al Quieda found with Iraq or Suddam; all lies folks; wake up americans!

Report this

By mrmb, August 4, 2008 at 3:13 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Fadel Abdallah,

The problem is not that we dont have an MD runing for president. We actually do have one: Ron Paul. See what they did to him.

The system is incapable of reform. Pure and simple.

Cyrena,

Im with you on that.

As usual Mr. Fisk proved his credentials as an imperialist mouthpiece. He clearly spouses the imperial game plan and was hoping that the recent visit by Assad to Iran would deliver the goods to the zionists and imperialists. I guess we are all allowed to be stupid here and there.

As far as Syrian relationships with Iran are concerned I cant see why the Syrians would abandon Iran for the sake of israel or US or because Sarkozy asked him to do so. Its pure lunacy. Their allaince has proven durable, strategic, well managed, and their enemies have been beaten time and again.

Mr. Fisk I suggest you go get drunk in Beirut and daydream of the colonial rule of Lebanon. Its over old man.

Report this

By webbedouin, August 4, 2008 at 1:57 pm Link to this comment

If only the headline of the last 7 years was, “US Succeeds by Doing Nothing”.

Oh how i long for an alternative reality…

Report this

By Cameiros, August 4, 2008 at 11:08 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I’m curious if Mr. Fisk believes Syria will be hit, along with Iran, by Israel or the U.S.
I’m sure the success of Mr. Assad is problematic for the USIsraeli axis.

Report this

By Fadel Abdallah, August 4, 2008 at 10:55 am Link to this comment

Let’s remember that Bashar Al-Asad is a Medical Doctor! Possibly better than any of his peers in the world’s political arena, he knows how to diagnose a disease and proceed to treat it.

So the lesson America and Europe might learn from Al-Asad is to insist that some of their future presidents should be MD’s.

So, instead of the “C” student in economics we have now, or the many other Law-ignorant graduates of law schools who know little about the laws of justice, morality and human rights, who dominated the American political scene for so long, we might need an excellent MD who can diagnose the political cancer and prescribe a cure for it!

No guarantees, of course, but it would worth trying, at least for a change!

Report this

By WARIS SHERE, August 4, 2008 at 8:43 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

President Bashar al-Assad of Syria is playing a fairly important and constructive role in the affairs of Middle East. President Assad’s latest trip to Paris and the welcome he received from President Nicolas Sarkozy - seals his place in history. Syria’s President, Bashar al-Assad reception in Paris lead to new openings across the Middle East. Nicolas Sarkozy’s invitation to Assad was controversial in France. The US remains suspicious, citing Iran, President Bashar al-Assad, still shunned by the US as a backer of terrorists and a close ally of Iran, had been boycotted in France and cold-shouldered by the EU since the 2005 assassination of Rafiq al-Hariri, the former Lebanese prime minister, in a bombing that was widely blamed on Syria. “This is for me a historic visit: an opening up to France and to Europe,” President Assad told Le Figaro. Nicolas Sarkozy’s shift on Syria reflects the constructive role Assad is deemed to have played in reaching May’s Doha agreement ending the impasse in Lebanon between his ally Hizbullah and the western-backed Beirut government, as well as the re-launch of peace talks with Israel. Syria and Israel negotiated for several years in the 1990s but failed to reached agreement over the Golan Heights, occupied since the 1967 war. New talks, mediated by Turkey, began after Israel bombed what the US has said was a nuclear reactor built by North Korea in Syria. Israel hopes to weaken Syria’s strategic alliance with Iran and its support for Hizbullah and the Palestinian Islamists of Hamas. Assad has insisted he will not abandon these relationships. “If you want stability and peace in the region we must have good relations with Iran,” he told Le Monde Diplomatique. The US remains suspicious, citing Iran, Hizbullah, Hamas and the movement of fighters from Syria into Iraq. Damascus may find rapprochement with Europe takes time. “They must accept that we are part of the solution not just in Lebanon but also in Iraq and Palestine,”  President Assad told Le Figaro, a very influential newspaper of France.

Report this

By cyrena, August 4, 2008 at 8:04 am Link to this comment

I could go for some caviar myself.

Let’s hope Israel doesn’t destroy that too.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.