LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
February 18, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Truthdigger of the Week: Lt. Col. Daniel L. Davis

This Gay Man Represented the President

Déjà Pooh

Apple's China Comes Home to Haunt Us

What's Really at Stake in 2012

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Comes the Revolution
Pay Close Attention to China

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
 * NEW! * Déjà Pooh

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar
Why Americans Hate Politics

Why Americans Hate Politics

By E.J. Dionne
$14.00

more items

 
Reports

Closing the Book on a Proud Tradition

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on Jul 20, 2008
Illustration by Peter Scheer

Editor’s note: For 33 years, the Los Angeles Times Sunday Book Review has brought the literary world to the doorstep of the nation’s largest book-buying community. That era is about to end, a fact that disturbs the section’s former editors who have written this formal protest.

One of the four former Times Book Review editors who wrote the protest below is Truthdig Literary Editor Steve Wasserman, whose weekly award-winning book review appears Fridays on Truthdig.

For more on the decline of journalism, read Chris Hedges’ latest column about the grim future of news.


  As former editors of the Los Angeles Times Book Review (1975 through 2005), we are dismayed and troubled at the decision by Sam Zell and his managers to cease publishing the paper’s Sunday Book Review.
  This step signals the end of an era begun 33 years ago when Otis Chandler, then the paper’s publisher and owner, announced the debut of the weekly section. Since then, the growth of the Los Angeles metropolitan region and the avidity of its numerous readers and writers has been palpable. For example, every year since its founding in 1996, the Los Angeles Times Festival of Books has attracted upwards of 140,000 people to the UCLA campus from all walks of life throughout Southern California. Four hundred writers from all over America typically participate. The written word is celebrated. It is the most significant civic event undertaken by the Los Angeles Times to deepen literacy and to strengthen the bond between its news coverage and its far-flung community of readers. But without the Book Review itself, the book festival will be a hollow joke.
  The dismantling of the Sunday Book Review section and the migration of a few surviving reviews to the Sunday Calendar section represent a historic retreat from the large ambitions which accompanied the birth of the section.
  To be sure, no section of any newspaper can remain hostage to past ways of covering the news of the day. We are convinced, however, that the way forward is to increase coverage of our literary culture—a culture that every day is more vibrant and diverse in the thriving megalopolis of Los Angeles.
  Angelenos in growing number are already choosing to cancel their subscriptions to the Sunday Times. The elimination of the Book Review, a philistine blunder that insults the cultural ambition of the city and the region, will only accelerate this process and further wound the long-term fiscal health of the newspaper.
  We urge readers and writers alike to join with us as we protest this sad and backward step.
  Sonja Bolle
  Digby Diehl
  Jack Miles
  Steve Wasserman

Advertisement


Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By MAR, July 23, 2008 at 10:57 am Link to this comment

It is indeed sad that we might lose the LA Times Book Reviews. The emperor and his subjects, both, need critical appraisals of literature, humor, historical writings and scientific publishing - or anything that is written.

While we might find them on the internet, I doubt it if they are not published elsewhere first. Who will pay? Would Truthdig fund a similar page?

Report this

By MAR, July 23, 2008 at 10:34 am Link to this comment

The internet (and blog comments)  may have spelled doom for some books - perhaps - I don’t think so. I just like to think that the reason is money - the book reviews can be had on this venue much easier and cheaper - that is if these media does not stifle the critical minds that write reviews. With bloggers like Boosch around, I wonder.

  It will be a foggy friday when I replace a book in my hands (and beside my chair the aroma of my favourite glass of single malt - which I can’t drink anymore]. This infernal laptop, wonderful as it is, more powerful and faster than computers which once took a whole room is like nuclear energy - for good and evil at the same time.  Good literature, history, biography and the other arts and sciences will not disappear, nor will the books that contain these gems of wisdom.

But it is sad indeed to see the LA Times give up the word on paper.

Us old farts have had our day, but we can still be sad at the passing of a great page. Perhaps this post by the four above might change some minds. Certainly Boosch and his illiterate brothers and sisters never will.

Report this

By James M. Martin, July 23, 2008 at 4:51 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

It’s indeed sad to learn that the L.A. Times Book Review seems to be on the way out.  Under one of the editors who signed the open letter, Digby Diehl, I used to write for the Review (circa 1970) and really hate to think it will no longer be published.  It’s a sad day, indeed.  I always looked forward to the Sunday Times just for this section. Surely there’s some way to save it.

Report this

By troublesum, July 21, 2008 at 5:48 pm Link to this comment

http://www.darkage.fsnet.co.uk/

Report this

By Boosch, July 21, 2008 at 1:25 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Boooooks? The emperor don’t need them, and kneether do his subjex.

Report this
skulz fontaine's avatar

By skulz fontaine, July 21, 2008 at 12:36 pm Link to this comment

Zell, Murdoch, and the barons of profitable illiteracy that rule the mainstream journalism roost are a cancer on the body politic. Some dare call it an insidious treason. Okay, maybe not some but I do. Dummy down the dummies and fascism will rule the day. The L.A. Times, the New York Times, the Washington Post, and one could fill in the newspaper blank, are doomed to extinction. Same motif could apply to ABCBSNBCNNMSNBC. They’ve all traded honorable investigative journalism for greasy profit margins and propaganda. How sad for Amerika. Books are after all, the fuel of thinking minds and individuality. Well, this is post 9/11 warmongering Amerika and we can’t have the sheeple thinking for themselves now, can we. Nope! Wouldn’t be prudent. So give us a “thousand points of twinkling light” and we can all go wow together and thank our lucky stars we had sum-thin purty to look-it at. Nothing to read but, purty stuffs to look-it at. Gosh, are we supposed to feel bad for the Times, the Times, and time and a half Times? Nah, they brought their demise upon themselves. Shouldn’t have been playing cutesy with the Bushistas. Fascist swine!

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






                        Number of characters remaining: 4000

Are you a human? Retype the word you see here.

     

Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.