![]() ![]() |
![]() |
| |
|
Educating the U.S. About the Middle EastPosted on Jul 15, 2008By Robert Fisk Originally printed in The Independent. Walid Moallem leans forward in the armchair of the Paris Intercontinental Opera. “It’s all on the record,” he snaps. It usually is. The Syrians can be up-front when you least expect it. Syria’s Foreign Minister is one of their top negotiators, a man who knows Israel’s diplomats almost as well as they know themselves, who understands all the traps of the Middle East. Tell me who murdered Rafiq Hariri, I ask him. And Mr. Moallem grins bleakly and reaches into his jacket pocket. His beefy hand emerges clutching a wad of pale green Syrian hundred-pound notes. “Tell me the answer and you can take all my money,” he says. He may see evil among Syria’s enemies but he will speak no evil, certainly not of the French. “We are building trust with the French,” he says. Syria is ready to co-operate on the prevention of illegal immigration, against “what you in the West call ‘terrorism’ ” and opening a developed economic partnership. And Mr. Moallem can be a bit preachy into the bargain. “You in the West have a moral duty in Europe to educate the United States more about the Middle East. If they don’t listen to you, they will not listen to us. They will continue with their mistakes.” I don’t think they’re going to listen, I mutter. But Mr. Moallem is in full flow. “When we announced our position in the Security Council against the invasion of Iraq, the Americans adopted a policy of isolating Syria. We know that the United States is a superpower and many countries prefer to follow its policies without question. We say: ‘We differ ... we belong to a region where we are in the middle of the eye of the storm.’ The United States is 10,000km far away from us. We are directly involved and influenced by regional issues. We consider dialogue, despite differences, is the most important in diplomacy. The message of President Assad to France is that the old policies are wrong, that only dialogue can solve difficult issues.” So, what about the opening of a Syrian embassy in Beirut and a Lebanese embassy in Damascus? “We reached agreement in principle to establish diplomatic relations. Unfortunately, after that, relations between the Syrian and Lebanese government were negative. A lot of Lebanese leaders tried publicly to accuse Syria of many issues [sic] of which Syria is innocent.” Were these issues, I ask Mr. Moallem, perhaps—well—were they assassinations? “Innocent!” he thunders. “At least, they provide no proof of their accusation. In a negative atmosphere, you cannot establish diplomatic relations. But after the Doha agreement [which called for a unity government in Lebanon and a veto over cabinet decisions by the pro-Syrian opposition] we hope that a positive atmosphere will be created. So now we are talking about two states, two independent sovereign states on an equal footing. The will of each side is to be respected.” And the Hariri tribunal to find his murderers? What did Assad and Sarkozy say about this? “Never mentioned—not once,” Mr. Moallem replies. “The French President asked President Assad to help, through his relations with Iran, in inviting international public opinion to understand that the Iranian nuclear programme is a peaceful one ... We stand firmly against the race of nuclear, biological or chemical weapons in our region.” So what was the mysterious target of Israel’s bombing raid on Syria? “It was a military location,” Mr. Moallem said slowly. “I can assure you that if it was a nuclear site, it would—after bombing—leave radiation. Do you really think, if our intention was to do this [develop nuclear weapons], we would allow the IAEA inspector to come from Vienna to examine the site?” Mr. Moallem’s pound notes remain on the table. But for how long? Previous item: The New Dominion Next item: The Real Legacy of the 'Reagan Revolution' Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment
|
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2008 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved. |
By samosamo, July 17 at 1:11 pm #
By thebeerdoctor, July 17 at 8:07 am
Instead we have Morning Joe instructing us that the American people want to know if tears well up in Obamas eyes, when the U.S. war jets do a fly over, during seventh inning stretch of a baseball game.****
I know this has got to be the most blantant sign of how bad our country has become with ideas and beliefs like this. Because of a bunch of vegged out stupid people have put the emotions as a/the top indicator as the qualities inherent in their idea of a leader we will certainly suffer for this. This could almost mean that ‘well, heck, he don’t cry as war jets fly over, I will vote for mccain.’
Report thisI sure looks like the base mass of people in america have been reduced to a quivering puddle of melted fat and dna incapable of any intelligent thought processes.
More kudos for our msm’s pledge to totally stupify the people.
By dicl, July 17 at 12:42 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
For a succinct summary of the whys and wherefors of our wars in the middle east read “Turning the Tables on the Israel-Firsters”, by Michael Scheuer. Even our two candidates have pledged allegence to Israel.In another era it would have been treasonous.
Report thisBy thebeerdoctor, July 17 at 8:07 am #
Jackpinesavage on his July 16, 5;08 am post gives the push to the shove, as it were. The facts reveal there is very little thought or analysis being given to anything being said on this campaign. Instead we have “Morning Joe” instructing us that the American people want to know if tears well up in Obama’s eyes, when the U.S. war jets do a fly over, during seventh inning stretch of a baseball game. According to these geniuses Senator Obama just hasn’t “closed the deal”. They say his soul is an unknown. They need to know if he really takes “pride” in America.
Report thisOn an artistic note, it should be noted that Woody Guthrie wrote This Land Is Your Land as a direct response to Kate Smith’s jingoistic bombast God Bless America.
By P. T., July 16 at 6:22 pm #
Ed,
If that’s the best you can do, you just proved my point. Re-read my original post:
The U.S. has plenty of Middle East specialists in the universities, but they are mostly ignored. In fact, they are derided.
Instead, we get they views of neo-cons who know nothing about the region and cannot speak the languages.
Report thisBy Ed Harges, July 16 at 5:35 pm #
P.T.: Another very influential neocon who is fluent in Arabic is Daniel Pipes. If you haven’t heard of him, then you have a very incomplete understanding of who the “prominent neocons” are. It’s not just who has a newspaper column. It’s who has clout in American journalism, academia, law, or government; and Arab-hating, Arabic-speaking neocons like Pipes (and Meyrev Wurmser) have lots of it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Pipes
Report thisBy Ed Harges, July 16 at 5:07 pm #
By P. T., July 15 at 11:27 pm:
Oh. so now you shift the goal posts. Before, it was “name one prominent necocon”, now it has to be a major columnist. Enough. I have proven that there are such neocons and that they are powerful and influential.
Report thisBy diamond, July 16 at 3:48 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
The stranglehold that Israel has on the media is quite extraordinary. A perfect example is the story on the prisoner and body exchange between Israel and Hezbollah. Over and over again the news reports referred to a four year old Israeli girl killed in a raid by one of the Hezbollah fighters released by Israel. But where do you see anything about this kind of thing on the Israeli side in the mainstream western media?
In the Khan Younis camp in Gaza Chris Hedges, former Middle East Bureau Chief for the Dallas Morning News, heard Israeli soldiers shouting insults in Arabic over loudspeakers mounted on armoured vehicles.
Come on dogs. Where are the dogs of Khan Younis? Come. Come sons of bitches. Sons of whores.
The boys of the camp ran to an electric fence that divides the camp from a Jewish settlement. They threw rocks at the soldiers and the armoured vehicles. Soon ambulances line the road below the fence in anticipation of what will follow. The soldiers shoot with silencers on their M-16 rifles. Later, in the hospital in Gaza, Hedges sees the result. Stomachs ripped out, gaping holes in limbs and torsos. An 11 year old boy, Ali Murad is killed, four others are seriously wounded. Hedges remarks that he has covered many conflicts, including Bosnia, but hes never seen soldiers entice children into a trap and shoot them for sport. Fahdi Abu Ammouna, 13, was also wounded. His mother tells Hedges that during the first intifada, her husband Samir was a prisoner in Israel. One morning Israeli soldiers burst into her two room house in the refugee camp. Her son was then six months old. The soldiers trashed her house and one of them threw her baby on the stove where he was severely burned. Later Hedges asks a ten year old boy, Ibrahim abu Awad, what he wants to do in life.
Kill Jews, the boy tells him.
There’s no balance in how this conflict is reported.
Report thisEverything Israel does is portrayed as righteous and done in self-defence and everything the Palestinians do (even in defence of their own survival) is portrayed as a crime against humanity. And with journalists like this operating on the Israeli side it’s easy to see why.
A reporter for the Israeli Arabic Service said this to Chris Hedges:
The Palestinians are animals. They are less than human. They are savage beasts. Israel is a land of love. Israelis love each other. But the Palestinians do not love. They hate. They should be destroyed. We should put fire to them. We should take back Beit Jala, Bethlehem, take back all the land.
One of the Israeli press officers who witnessed this told Chris Hedges, that the journalist was ‘a great man, a poet. A man of peace.
I can only ask, in what universe?
By Howard, July 16 at 12:50 pm #
Scheuer writes poorly. Read the article and find it full of innuendoes and falsehoods. Propaganda of the worst kind.
One of the worst cannards offered up is that the “ Israeli-firsters (whatever that is !), started the Iraq war.”
Now really. I thought it was we here in the United States. Ya’ know. Our government here. Didn’t know that our officials were that susceptible to a lobbyist group. Like the Irish, or the Polish, or the French lobby. Or the farm lobby. or the sugar lobby.
Report thisBy Robert, July 16 at 12:22 pm #
Turning the Tables
on the Israel-Firsters
by Michael Scheuer
“Now that the dust has settled in the spat between journalist Joe Klein and the ideologues at Commentary, it is time to regret the ink spilled over the non-issue of “dual loyalties.” The idea that there are U.S. citizens who have equal loyalties to the United States and Israel is passé. American Israel-firsters have long since dropped any pretense of loyalty to the United States and its genuine national interests. They have moved brazenly into the Israel first, last, and always camp. Sen. Joseph Lieberman, Norman Podhoretz, Victor Davis Hanson, the Rev. Franklin Graham, Alan Dershowitz, Rudy Giuliani, Douglas Feith, the Rev. Rod Parsley, Paul Wolfowitz, James Woolsey, Bill Kristol, the Rev. John Hagee, and the thousands of wealthy supporters of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) appear to care about the United States only so far as Washington is willing to provide immense, unending funding and the lives of young U.S. service personnel to protect Israel. These individuals and their all-for-Israel journals Commentary, National Review, the Weekly Standard, and the Wall Street Journal amount to nothing less than a fifth column intent on involving 300 million Americans in other peoples’ religious wars, making them pay and bleed to protect a nation in which the United States has no genuine national security interest at stake.
The Israel-firsters’ success is, of course, the stuff of which legends are made. Most recently, for example, we heard President Bush echo Sen. Lieberman’s insane and subversive contention that the United States has a “duty” to ensure the fulfilling of God’s millennia-old promise to Abraham regarding the creation and survival of Israel. Bush told the Knesset all Americans are ready to endlessly bleed and pay to ensure Israel’s security. And where does the president derive authority to make such a commitment in the name of his countrymen? From the Constitution? On the basis of America’s dominant religion? From heaven forbid a thoughtful, hardheaded analysis of U.S. interests?
No, Bush’s pledge was based on none of these. Bush’s decision to more deeply involve America in the eternal Arab-Israeli war was based on nothing less than the corruption wrought on the American political system by the Israel-firsters, AIPAC’s enormous treasury, and the lamentable but growing influence of America’s leading evangelical Protestant preachers.
The Israel-firsters started the Iraq war and now have the United States locked into an occupation of that country that may not end in any of our lifetimes. Unless Americans ignore the likes of Hanson, Podhoretz, Lieberman, Woolsey, and Wolfowitz, the cost in blood and treasure will ultimately bankrupt America.
AIPAC is a perfectly legal organization, and the wealth of its members is channeled into reliable campaign contributions for any candidate from either party who will put Israel’s interests above America’s. From McCain to Obama, from Pelosi to Giuliani, from Hillary Clinton to Vice President Cheney, AIPAC pumps money to any and every American politician who is willing to adopt an Israel-first policy.
Leading American Protestant evangelical preachers men like Hagee, Parsley, and Graham are the newest and perhaps most anti-American members of this fifth column. They serve two purposes: (1) to reinforce in the minds of their flocks the Bush-Lieberman absurdity that the United States has a “duty” to ensure Israel’s survival; and (2) to use religious rhetoric to steadily convince the Muslim world that U.S. leaders are interested only in taming and if need be, destroying Islam.”
Click on URL for the rest of the details:
http://www.antiwar.com/scheuer/?articleid=13139
Report thisBy paul easton, July 16 at 11:18 am #
It took the devastation of WWII for the Germans to face the truth about their polity, and now they are among the most peaceable of peoples.
Now we are plunging into an equal devastation, this time economic, though it was certainly accelerated by the neocon’s Iraq War. I think Americans will wise up fast.
Not to mention the fact that the Second Messiah is already showing his true colors. When Obamamania crashes the survivers will be thoroughly disillusioned with the System.
Report thisBy cyrena, July 16 at 9:36 am #
By P. T., July 15 at 11:27 pm #
Ed,
Name one neo-con who speaks Arabic or Farsi (or even Hebrew) who regularly appears on American television or is a columnist for a major American newspaper.
~~~~~
I can’t think of any. Can anybody else?
~~~~~
ApprxAM, I can’t find your comment that included the mechanics of using a feather to push a square boulder up a greased hill. Where did it go?
I wanna try that.
(Actually, it just occurred to me that I’ve BEEN trying that, every time I respond to a post from an inSAME ideologue on this forum.) Silly me.
Report thisBy Howard, July 16 at 7:32 am #
Gee, Saggey, what a historian YOU are. If you buy into that utter false stuff and nonsense and want to revise history, then you are also denying that there was WWII.
Tuf to imagine there are people like that around.
Report thisBy jackpine savage, July 16 at 5:08 am #
What?! Educate ourselves about another region of the world...you’ve gotta be kidding. We’re not even educated about our own history and political machinations.
Yeah, sure, it would be great if we woke up tomorrow and suddenly Americans cared enough to lift the veil of their own ignorance. But who’s going to educate us? Our president doesn’t know the difference between Shia and Sunni. One of our presidential candidates still thinks that Czechoslovakia is a country. And a frightening percentage of the population couldn’t pass a simple, world geography test.
And there’s the rub. Our system of self-governance was established with a “well-informed electorate” in mind. Without it we’re easy prey for television bobbleheads and ideologues like the neo-cons. Add to that the fact that what little education most of us receive consists of indoctrinating the belief that America is exceptional and the best in every case. Put it all together, and what can you expect?
Report thisBy P. T., July 15 at 11:27 pm #
Ed,
Name one neo-con who speaks Arabic or Farsi (or even Hebrew) who regularly appears on American television or is a columnist for a major American newspaper.
Report thisBy Fadel Abdallah, July 15 at 7:14 pm #
Okay, it’s always been about education versus ignorance, stupid!
But I do digress by repeating myself!
Report thisBy Ed Harges, July 15 at 5:10 pm #
By P. T., July 15 at 9:41 am:
PT: first of all, you said “the languages of the region”. Hebrew is one of those langauges, and I’m sure you won’t dispute that many neocons know it.
Secondly, regarding other regional languages, there is the example of Meyrev Wurmser, wife of the odious neocon David Wurmser and a prominent neocon in her own right. She is fluent in Arabic and runs MEMRI, a neocon outfit that selectively and slantingly translates Arab news items to “prove” to the Americans that Arabs are evil, by “educating” us as to what “those people” really think. Ms. Wurmser employs a whole army of Arabic-speaking neocon translators working night and day to disinform the American public about Arabs for Israel’s benefit.
The most dangerously effective neocons are those who know Arabic. Many Jewish Israelis are fluent in Hebrew, Arabic, and English, have dual US/Israeli citizenship, and are staunch neoconservatives ideologically.
Report thisBy cyrena, July 15 at 5:01 pm #
y samosamo, July 15 at 2:33 pm #
By cyrena, July 15 at 12:11 pm #
It probably is because if I called it criminal which it is I would be contradicting other comments I have made in that to be criminal there is a certain amount of intelligence especially if you are to get away with it.
~~~~
Ah Samosamo,
GOT IT!! And, I sure do appreciate your integrity, honesty, and keeping it all sane.
Matter of fact, I especially appreciate the sanity minus the drama. Oh yeah. Consistency means a whole lot to me..especially in this rabbit hole existence ‘they’ have embraced, and are trying to shove on the rest of us.
As for contradicting ourselves from time to time, I think that’s OK, as long as we recognize and acknowledge that it might be exactly that.
Shit happens, and sometimes we DO have to contradict ourselves, or change our minds, or whatever else, to stay in the reality of the moment.
It’s like the bumper sticker says…
“If you haven’t changed your mind lately, how do you know you still have one?”
Thanks for the reply. I do agree with you.
Report thisBy JMCSwan, July 15 at 2:55 pm #
yours truly, (July 15 at 10:41 am)
If your reference to justice for the Palestinians refers to the ‘secret’ Annapolis Middle East Plan, and internet education thereof, i.e.: BBB Annapolis MD _ Middle East
Namely, BRIEFLY titles of document, and BRIEF excerpts follows:
---
COLONEL G.H.W. JESSOP-McNAMARA-BUTLER, USMC
JERICHO G.PEACE.C vs. ARMAGEDDON HOLYWAR GIFT
KIND-WINNARAINBOW-WOMAN R.S.V.P INVITATIONS &
COMMANDER RAMIUS~ $£ªΨPILLAR~TYPHOON LOGISTICS
CHEYENNE KING WYOMING LOBSTER SSATIN SUMMIT
. ...
NASRULLAH BBC CLARKE: PALESTINIAN STATEHOOD
Report thisBy JMCSwan, July 15 at 2:55 pm #
BRIEF REASONS FOR JERICHO Green.PEACE.Council
1. HUMAN RESOURCE SCARCITY:
It is hardly necessary for me to raise the issue of historys oil/black gold and conquest (whether land or ideology, etc.) deification, curse on the Middle East (world). Nor human resource scarcity: geopolitical sincerity, commitment and honourability (political radar Richter scale value?)? Is it remotely possible to envision a stable, reasonably peaceful Middle East (world), in the absence of very frank public political, academic, and corporate conversations (particularly prole education) on among others, but predominantly: consequences of population growth (vis a viz natural resources)? HomerLea-Orwell would humbly suggest the answer as: MISSION IMPOSSIBLE.
2. GEOPOLITICS & NATIONAL INTEREST:
In the (i) face of Peak Oil, (ii) absence of UFO Disclosure revealing the reality of free energy capabilities; there is no future GDP growth. The only future economic growth is of the yum, yum variety: depopulation of each countrys population towards a balance with their ecological footprint.
Wars are huge consumers of energy. They are extremely destructive. We will have destroyed nations, cities and infrastructure, and lack the energy to rebuild, no matter how many printing presses there are printing how many billions of whatever bourse currency.
3. OPTIONS:
A. International acceptance of the Oil Depletion Protocol/Jericho Forgiveness step to Healing Process: (2008) All nations leaders take responsibility for reducing their population ecological footprint as humanely as possible, U.S. withdrawal from Iraq & Afghanistan, release of political prisoners, Palestinian statehood; (2009 à) political will for return to Gold (or similar) standard, Homers negative compound interest protocol, official UFO Disclosure & international space program..
B. Religious Wars, i.e. fulfilment of Armageddon (end times) prophecies.
C. Nationalistic Wars, driven by Corporate Predators, predominantly Investment Bankers.
D. Manmade Depopulation Biological Wars: From AIDS & Ebola, to SARS, cancer, etc. etc.
My {our} effort herewith is to attempt to encourage (A), and reduce the likelihood, or at the very least the causation and severity of (B), (C) and (D); whereby (A) occurs within a new relating context, focussing repressed energies which plausibly contributed to (B) - (D) towards a new more transparent, intimate, meaningful way of communicating and relating. I cant guarantee that it will work. We will be a work in progress as we experiment, and all of us will at times stumble, fall, make fools of ourselves, help each other stand up again, and hopefully intentionally help ourselves, while helping each other.
----
I have no problem, further discussing, or exploring the possibility, and implementation thereof, if you are implying that there is SERIOUS, COMMITTED AND HONOURABLE interest therein.
Previously—and as I see it still, although that can change of course, and if or when it does, fine, but for now it has not yet changed—the problem was, an insistence by various officials to plausible deniability. That, an official at the Iranian Embassy, was willing to admit—once—that I was representing the Pentagon on the issue, seemed irrelevant to officials at the US Embassy, and South African Goverment.
Accordingly I filed the aforementioned suggestion of ‘BBB Annapolis MD’, as:
[STAR] SUBJECT TO ‘JAG’FIGDYE PATRIOT PROTOCOLS [STAR]
So, let’s see if there is, and if so, if it is serious, committed and honourable. ...
[[PS: I only have ADSL internet contact for a few more days. After that my access to the internet will be sporadic at best.]]
Report thisBy samosamo, July 15 at 2:33 pm #
By cyrena, July 15 at 12:11 pm #
It probably is because if I called it criminal which it is I would be contradicting other comments I have made in that to be criminal there is a certain amount of intelligence especially if you are to get away with it. But even so intelligent and smart people do incredibly stupid things from time to time and I think I was just trying say it like that if any of those clowns really stopped to think about it, they would do themselves. Maybe a good example would be w’s wife that ran over and killed a friend, lover, aquaintance but it appears to never have bothered her one jot.
Report thisBy P. T., July 15 at 1:39 pm #
One thing that debilitates U.S. policy is the insistence that issues in the region can be disconnected from each other, and nobody there will notice. For example, the U.S. maintains that it can, with the right marketing strategy, convince Muslims of its goodwill while simultaneously backing Zionist expansionism.
Report thisBy cyrena, July 15 at 12:11 pm #
“To understand the whole unbreakable stance of their supidity, one has to consider why none of them have come to the realization of their incredible harm inflicted in this country and around the world and havent put a gun to their head and blown their brains out..”
Samo, I think this isn’t so much stupidity as it is pure evil. The Banality of Evil. They don’t care. Any other person WOULD blow their brains out.
But, think about it. This is really the American mindset of the elite. Remember back when the stock market crashed at the onset of the Great Depression? All of those wealthy or semi-wealthy folks were jumping out of windows and blowing their brains out. NOT because they felt responsible for it, but just because they’d lost what they thought they had.
Now somebody like GW wouldn’t even do it if he lost all of his own trillions, because he IS that stupid, and evil on top of it. But if such a thing happened to many of these neocons, and they lost everything, that would be the time they’d start blowing their brains out.
Not before…
Report thisBy thebeerdoctor, July 15 at 10:42 am #
samosamo, it reminds me a revelatory section in a Graham Greene novel, when the narrative reveals that all the high-minded policy stuff is in fact, so much useless junk, and that the real business of the enterprise, carving up the world, can proceed without further pretension.
Report thisBy yours truly, July 15 at 10:41 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
The Education Has To Be Done On The Internet
“Why?”
“MSM is a megaphone for the powers that be.”
“What’s the message that has to get out?”
“That justice for the Palestinians is the key to peace in the Mideast.”
“Brought about how?”
“The Jewish settlers, after apologizing to the Palestinians for having harged in, uninvited, and taken over their land, ask the Palestinians if it would be possible for Jew and Palestinian to sit down together for the purpose of working things out.”
“Based on?”
“One equals one.”
“And the Palestinian response?”
“Yes, of course, but why didn’t you ask us that question a century ago?
Report thisBy samosamo, July 15 at 10:16 am #
Why worry about what you don’t already know because you are covered by your own agenda that has been built up since the mid-70s in the neocon think tanks where all sorts of cess is stirred around and pumped out as truth, justice and the american way for the good of the world. Exactly where american’s current governmental supidity overrides the world’s intellect.
Report thisTo understand the whole unbreakable stance of their supidity, one has to consider why none of them have come to the realization of their incredible harm inflicted in this country and around the world and haven’t put a gun to their head and blown their brains out.
As many people that had to be involved in any of the shady acts of aggression against our own country be it complicity in voting or attacks against our country and other countries and no one has stepped forward to expose any of it leads me to think that a bunch of people have been paid off enough to keep quiet and enjoy their money(lord there has been enough money stolen to believe that) or there are a bunch of people wearing concrete shoes at the bottom of the ocean or there was a lot of practice of extraordinary rendition carried out to ‘hide’ these potential whistle blowers. And the opportunities for that to happen are certainly there.
So, why go back to middle east history 101 and try to understand anything at all?
By P. T., July 15 at 9:41 am #
I would like to know the name of any prominent neocons in the U.S. who are fluent in Arabic or Farsi. Eliot Abrams? lol
Report thisBy cyrena, July 15 at 8:45 am #
By P. T., July 15 at 8:22 am #
The U.S. has plenty of Middle East specialists in the universities, but they are mostly ignored. In fact, they are derided.
~~~~
Yep P.T...they ARE indeed ignored and derided. Sometimes we’re even attacked viciously and hatefully by those who would prefer to make sure that nobody knows even a morsel of the truth.
How else could one justify the atrocities of the past several years if they had even a clue to the truth, rather than the bullshit propaganda that the thugs have been so determined to put out there?
beerdoc.
I’ve said the same thing about Scott Ritters article as well. That Obama should read it. It wouldn’t make an iota’s worth of difference with McCain.
Report thisBy Ed Harges, July 15 at 8:41 am #
re: By P. T., July 15 at 12:22 pm:
Actually, P.T., many of the neocons and their Israeli counterparts do know plenty about the region and do speak one or more of the regional languages (Hebrew, for starters; and Israelis often speak Arabic as well) - but they are Jewish American or Israeli Zionist fanatics, and they’re the only “experts” Americans are allowed to hear from on TV. Benjamin Netanyahu, for example, is not ignorant of the region. He’s just an ethnic nationalist bigot. He’s very happy to “explain” the Arabs to us and our Congress and he gets lots of opportunities to do so.
Report thisBy P. T., July 15 at 8:22 am #
The U.S. has plenty of Middle East specialists in the universities, but they are mostly ignored. In fact, they are derided.
Instead, we get they views of neo-cons who know nothing about the region and cannot speak the languages.
Report thisBy thebeerdoctor, July 15 at 8:03 am #
This particular Robert Fisk article is a prime example of how much the United States does not know about that area of the world. Senator McCain should read this. Senator Obama should read this. It is too bad that so much diplomacy in the United States, is left to political cronies.
Report this