LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.  
November 8, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

House Passes Health Care Bill

Steve Fraser on the Crisis of Capitalism

Sen. George McGovern on the Presidency From Lincoln to Obama

'Daily Show' Insta-Classic: What Lurks Within Glenn Beck?

Happy Birthday, Pat Tillman

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar
At Large

At Large

By Ellen Goodman

more items

 
Reports

‘Did I Mention He’s Black?’

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Jun 23, 2008

By Eugene Robinson

The question isn’t whether race will be an issue in the general election campaign between Barack Obama and John McCain. Race is already an issue, even if largely confined to the shadow world of implication and coded language. Obama is now dragging the race issue into the sunlight—a move that has to be considered both risky and inevitable.

    I say inevitable because the fact of Obama’s race isn’t something that voters could possibly miss, whatever they think about it. The riskiness of dealing openly with race is every bit as obvious as Obama’s skin color: A new Washington Post-ABC News poll shows that three of every 10 Americans acknowledge having “at least some feelings of racial prejudice.”

    Other findings in the survey suggest that the distance between blacks and whites in this country has narrowed steadily in recent decades; nearly eight of 10 whites say they have a “fairly close personal friend” who is black, for example, while barely more than half of whites reported having black friends when the question was asked in 1981. Still, the poll suggests that as far as we’ve come on matters of race, we have a long way to go—and that some reservoir of racial suspicion remains, should anyone want to try to exploit it.

    On Friday, speaking at a fundraiser in Jacksonville, Fla., Obama made what can only be described as a pre-emptive strike. “It is going to be very difficult for Republicans to run on their stewardship of the economy or their outstanding foreign policy,” he said. “We know what kind of campaign they’re going to run. They’re going to try to make you afraid. They’re going to try to make you afraid of me. ‘He’s young and inexperienced, and he’s got a funny name. And did I mention he’s black?’ ”

    He went on to predict that Republicans would say that “he’s got a feisty wife” as a way of attacking Michelle Obama. “We know the strategy because they’ve already shown their cards,” he said. “Ultimately, I think the American people recognize that old stuff hasn’t moved us forward. That old stuff just divides us.”

Advertisement

    The Republican Party has a problematic history on race, beginning with Nixon’s “Southern strategy.” The era when the likes of the late Lee Atwater could overtly use race as a wedge issue is long gone. Today, any appeal to latent racial prejudice would have to be made more subtly—the suggestion that there’s something of the “other” about Obama, that he might not share traditional American values, that there’s some question about his love of country. Given the steadfast patriotism that African-Americans have displayed since the nation’s founding, none of this makes any historical sense. But it’s more about the vibe than the reality, and the fact is that voters are attuned not just to what a presidential candidate says, but also how the candidate makes them feel.

    Since Obama has given his opponents little ammunition, they have focused on those who are close to him, beginning with his former pastor. Now some critics have turned to Obama’s “feisty” wife, whose image as a tall, strong, confident black woman can perhaps be made to seem threatening to some people.

    If there are voters who absolutely won’t support Obama because of his race, there’s not much he can do about it. But at least he can blow away all the smoke. He has served notice that he doesn’t intend to be Swift-boated on race the way John Kerry was on his war record—and that he will hit back even when attacks are more atmospheric than concrete.

    The Obama campaign made another move on this front last week when it began running a new television ad in a number of battleground states, including some, such as Georgia and North Carolina, that Republicans have long considered safe. In the ad, which is more about the candidate’s character than his policies, Obama speaks of his personal history and delivers a paean to traditional American values—while the viewer sees old family photos of his mother, who was white, and her parents, who helped raise him.

    It’s hard to see the ad’s iconography as anything but a reminder that while Obama is firmly self-identified as African-American, he is also biracial. He is a black man who speaks with great affection and admiration for his white grandparents, who look like Middle America personified. The message: Race may be thorny and complicated, but it’s no match for love.
     
    Eugene Robinson’s e-mail address is eugenerobinson(at)washpost.com.
   
    © 2008, Washington Post Writers Group


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By cyrena, June 27, 2008 at 4:37 am #

kath cantrella..

I just wanted to say that I overwhelmingly enjoy your posts!!

You remind me SO MUCH of one of my favorite professors, who is also from Australia. When I ‘read’ you, I ‘hear’ her. smile

Thanks for the uplifts.

Report this

By Marriea, June 26, 2008 at 8:07 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

It’s fun to watch Obama fight the bigots with their own weapons.

With regards to Michelle Obama, she reminds me in many ways of the TV icon Claire Huxable of the Cosby Show.  She is a woman who had an opinion and I hope that Michelle is allowed to spread her wings.  Hell she has earned the right to be open about her thoughts.

Report this

By J. Mezure Carter, June 26, 2008 at 8:03 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Kath Cantarella, my statements were not a direct criticism of you, they were meant to be a general statement responding to the Robinson post.  Hatred is something that is not exemplified exclusively by racism.  In the US society, hatred is displayed in most areas of public engagement.  It’s expressed in mild and harsh form in the cultural arena as well as in the civic arena.  My hatred statement is just my clumsy attempt to put this human trait front and center and not allow race to stand alone as the only form of hatred that we need to discuss.  And as you amply said, how men are soft on sex offenders is a travesty.  Yet if we just look at race or gender offences, we fall into a trap that does not reveal what any person can say or do to control the idea of hate.  If people insist that they must hate Obama because of his skin color, then nothing can change that if we just talk about race.  Yet if we look at hatred in all its complexities, we at least can understand why a person could hate someone because of skin color. 


NF you find the real issue is whether an Obama presidency would lead the US to look like socialist Europe.  I suggest that you look at the type of government that those countries have.  Most of the Western European countries have unitary systems, whereas the US system is a federation.  Obama has worked successfully in both a state and federal legislature.  He is a constitutional lawyer, a rarity in the legislative arena.  What I can say to you is that he fully understands the importance of state’s rights.  This is evident when he agreed with the recent Supreme Court decision that addresses the death penalty in child rape cases.  And he agrees with the 2nd amendment decision made by the court today.  He fully understands that the rule of law trumps personal beliefs, therefore legislation has to be constitutionally correct not emotionally correct.  If his legal expertise is socialist, it will have to be examined in the realm of the law.  Make your judgement of both McCain and Obama based on their understanding of the law and the effects of legislation, not on race or some other identity, that as I said above, only exemplify hatred.

Report this

By John P., June 26, 2008 at 2:20 pm #

From my own experience i have found that the race issue falls on generational lines. Those who formed their opinions or had their opinions formed for them before the civil rights movment of the 60s and those who where formed during and after the 60s. it may be stating the obvious, but the earlier a person receives their understanding of race relations, the less likely those opinions will change. So people over 50 where less influenced by the civil rights movement and will have a much harder time looking past Sen. Obamas skin color, and those under 40 and younger will not. I fall in the middle, in my forties..So..
i’m moving to canada..BUT i will cheer him on from there…{levity..just incase some one takes umbrage}
JPB

Report this

By kath cantarella, June 25, 2008 at 7:08 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Mr Carter, if my posts hit the wrong note with Mr Robinson’s article, I’m sorry.

Report this

By kath cantarella, June 25, 2008 at 6:47 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

reply to J Mezure Carter:

Do you think he can be hated that much? He is so damn likeable. I have to keep reminding myself that he’s a politician (i don’t like them much) just to keep it straight. I think he knows what he’s doing, and he has played a perfect game. He doesn’t need my advice, i believe you.

I recently fell for one of those ugly racist rumours, but i fell for it because Obama’s a bloke, not because he’s black. If someone said it about McCain I would’ve believed it just as easily (in fact, about Mac it’s probably true, even if he keeps it to himself). Men’s attitudes generally (not all men), and the legal system too, in Australia, are very soft on sex offenders. There are almost no convictions (those lying whores!), and when there are they often get no time or time served, or a couple of months or years with parole. (Apparently, there are always mitigating circumstances for raping someone, esp. if you don’t bash her up real bad while doing it.) The rape survivor gets life. And then the country does not improve, it gets worse. Because people are allowed to think of others that way. That you can rape them and it is largely acceptable.

Obama is a very smart, good and fair man. Michelle wouldn’t have married him otherwise.

Obama is human! human! human!

Report this

By nf, June 25, 2008 at 3:36 pm #

I hope race does not play a part in this election. Obama is certainly a talented and likable individual and presents an opportunity for a discussion not of race but whether or not the US is ready for socialism. This is the real issue at hand. It is apparent from his speeches and tax proposals that his goal is to bring this country to a socialist state similar to those in Europe. We who believe that socialism is wrong for this country and wrong for the future of the human race need to do everything to defeat Obama.  Unfortunately, we have a weak candidate in McCain.

Report this

By J. Mezure Carter, June 25, 2008 at 2:10 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

What is a cynic?  Is it someone who believes that everyone is out for his self?  If the nature of the beast isn’t self interest there would be no human race.  So now let’s address this on key posting.  That old 19th-century one-drop rule dictate is not very well understood by 21st-century Americans, but hatred is a human trait that does not need defining.  What was evident in the primaries and will be present during the general election period is the vile behavior of those who are consumed by this debasing characteristic.  Advise to Obama is rampant.  He is told to profess his religious leaning, but not too blatantly, to speak proper English, but not too properly, to show his companionate character, but not show vulnerability.  Obama is a black man, a half white black man, a foreign man, an African man, an elite man, an erudite man.  All these identities find me wondering, is Obama human?  Is he suffering from identity fatigue?  He had better watch what he is doing cause those bad racist Republicans are gonna get him.  He had better pay homage to those Hillary feminist.  He had better defer to those disenfranchised mountain folks.  Oh you should be afraid Obama cause they gonna get you.  This is scary stuff.  What forty-six-year-old person is pristine, without pimples or prickly nerves pulling at every vital function. Let Obama’s campaigners rack their brains over all these silly machinations, but those of us outside that arena need to shout in response, he’s human, he’s human, he’s human.

Report this

By Martin Timothy, June 25, 2008 at 12:45 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Obama is in court charged.

The big screen has footage of GWB telling the world that he witnesed the first 911 air strike on the WTC from a school in Florida.

Question from the prosecutor: Senator Obama how could it be… the networks never broadcast it, so how did it get there.

Obama, sweatin’ a little grunts.

The Prosecutor: You are gonna be found guilty of capital treason lest you tell the court how the footage got there.

Obama: Well I guess the President’s own people had a link.

Prosecutor: Sure they did, so as a United States Senator is it not your responsibility to bring such massive treason to the attention of the wider public.

Obama: Under what jurisdiction do you propose to bring this prosecution, no one else said anything, why should I.

Prosecutor: Under the capital provisions of revolutionary justice, do you have anything else to say, because your assertion that although you were aware of treason at the White House you remained silent, despite the oath you took in the Senate to uphold the laws of the United States.

Obama: This court is illegal.

Judge: Senator Obama you are found guilty of capital treason, and are sentenced to death.

The Appellant Judge endorses the decision of the bench, the execution is to take place immediately.

The court was convened on the dirt street of a western town, Obama is requested to walk under a lamp post, I fix a hemp noose about his neck and give the order to heave, and Barak Hussein Obama is hauled high on a lamp post and dies kikkin’and jerkin’ right on Main Street.

Hillary will be tried in the same way, with McCain and Ron Schmaul and every one of other traitors, who conspired before or after the fact of 911.

Report this

By americahappens1, June 24, 2008 at 6:42 pm #

http://www.myspace.com/americahappens

Check out this clip. It will add a whole new insight to the subject of Race in America.

Report this

By DinoB, June 24, 2008 at 4:41 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Mr. Robinson,

You said, “The Republican Party has a problematic history on race”

Please, as a latin who has suffers from racism as well Obama has some answering to do.

His pro Lincoln blather is painful. How far up the cringe inducing ladder does this run?
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1077287,00.html

It’s time for our first legimate black candidate for president explain how he can adulate a person who is the antithesis of the official line. Since this site is called truthdig, please don’t tell me you are a lincoln lover as well. Perhaps you’ve never read any of his writings, speaches, etc.

It just shows that Obama is a politician same as the rest.

That said, I will vote for him as McCain is pscho. He should be put in an old person’s home not the oval office.

Dino

Report this

By Alan, June 24, 2008 at 4:20 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

June 24, 2008
Dissociated Press Dispatch

John McCain has chosen Don Imus as his
running mate.  During a press conference at
the Republican National Electoral Demagogy
Committee McCain announced his choice:
“John and Don, that’s our ticket; he’s got
the mouth and I’ve got the war record, what
more do ya need, in Aridzona or anywhere?”
McCain was seen to list slightly as he left
the podium.  One Republican pollster opined
“Definitely Reaganesque”.

Report this

By cyrena, June 24, 2008 at 12:57 pm #

I agree cwhipps. It s an excellent piece from Eugene. And, it’s good work for Obama as well. Of course Obama knew this going in, and did it anyway. I have a book with a similar title somewhere around here..

“Feel the fear, and do it anyway.” In other words..it’s if worth doing, there’s risk. Always. I know other great leaders who’ve made the same choices.

Meantime, it’s a good thing he doesn’t have me on his campaign team. If folks think Michelle is ‘feisty’, they would be ready to wire my jaw shut and take away all of my writing implements…at least until after the inauguration.

Now what would happen if it was Michelle that said a fresh new terror attack on US soil would help Obama’s chances, which is what Charlie Black claims about McCain’s chances?

Well, the whole family would be run out of the country. Charlie Black just apologizes.

Report this

By Sang Ze, June 24, 2008 at 10:51 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Marjory Ross will set the record straight.

Report this

By kath cantarella, June 24, 2008 at 6:04 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

i forgot to mention that i liked this piece very much, Eugene.

Report this

By cwhipps, June 24, 2008 at 5:47 am #

One of your very best, Eugene.

In this dark and threatening polemic, love may be the only, or best light.

Report this

By kath cantarella, June 24, 2008 at 4:23 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

As I am Australian this may not apply to many US citizens, but personally my suspicions about Obama were (still are) about his profession and class, his style, gender (perhaps you need to have lived my life to figure that one out), and his meteoric rise: he is a successful male politician who charms the pants off everyone, and i am a cynic. I’m sure race is an issue as you say, as an American you would know, but be careful you don’t make more of it than it is worth. If it really was a big issue, Obama wouldn’t be where he currently is. There’s probably more prejudice against Obama because of his class, than his race. He needs to be careful how he expresses himself in that respect. Anything that sounds like condescension will be a mistake. He also needs to treat Hillary’s female supporters with respect, because he took something very precious away from them.
I also think he needs to talk more about what he’s actually going to do when he gets into office, not just rhetoric. Because that’s how the Republicans have been attacking him, and if Obama is clear about his policies in his public appearances, they won’t be able to con people so easily, prejudice or no.
As for Michelle, she’s in line for the same treatment recently dished out to Hillary.
Personally i’ve never had a problem with Michelle, i wouldn’t mind if you made her president.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
Click here to learn more about Truthdig
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
Chrome Bag - Free Shipping
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.