LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.  
 
January 7, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Blagojevich vs. the Senate

Navel-Gazing in the Grand Old Party

Yukking It Up at the Blago Show

Israeli Voices for Peace

Gauging Obama’s Silence on Gaza

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Tragedy Repeats Itself

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar
Print Thumbnail

Exit Strategy

Mr. Fish
$250

more items

 
Reports

New Hampshire Heads Back to the Spotlight

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Jun 19, 2008

By E.J. Dionne

    HANOVER, N.H.—The race for electoral votes could be so close in November that small states may well pick the next president. Among the diminutive states, New Hampshire is by far the most interesting.

    Consider that in 2000, George W. Bush beat Al Gore here by 7,211 votes (Ralph Nader got just over 22,000). If New Hampshire’s four electoral votes had gone the other way, Gore would have won and Florida would not have mattered.

    New Hampshire is also one of only three states that changed sides between 2000 and 2004, and the only one that switched to the Democrats. John Kerry carried it by 9,274 votes.

    Because the state holds the nation’s first primary, voters here have been studying the candidates for well over a year. New Hampshire probably has the highest percentage of citizens who have actually met John McCain and Barack Obama.

    Maddeningly, the polls suggest that the vote here this year could be as close as it was in the last two elections. “You’re going to see house-to-house combat for these votes,” says Rep. Carol Shea-Porter, a Democrat.

    If John McCain has a political second home, this is it, the place where the Straight Talk Express first rolled. McCain won in a landslide over Bush in the 2000 primary and he launched his political comeback here this year. “He has experienced rebirth twice in New Hampshire,” chuckles Rep. Paul Hodes, a Democrat and an early Obama supporter.

    Republicans insist that McCain’s special standing gives him a kind of immunity. “The thing Democrats are counting on nationally doesn’t work here: They can’t turn him into George Bush’s third term,” said Tom Rath, a veteran New Hampshire Republican strategist. “New Hampshire looked at George Bush eight years ago and John McCain eight years ago and understood there was a difference.”

    Rath, who supported Mitt Romney in the Republican primary, learned the depth of the state’s easy familiarity with McCain the hard way. The Romney campaign hoped it might turn voters away from McCain by giving them new information about him, Rath said, but discovered that “there was nothing we could tell them that they didn’t know.”

    Compounding the uncertainty, both Hodes and Rath said, is the fact that many independents, who were free to vote in either party’s primary, expressed sympathy for both Obama and McCain.

    “I spoke to a lot of independent voters who said, ‘I’m going to vote for Obama or McCain. I just can’t figure it out, I just can’t decide,’” said Hodes. “They’d say, ‘They’re both straight talkers, they both want to bring people together, they’re both honest.’”

    For many independents, by far the state’s largest group of voters, Obama and McCain were, Hodes said, “the dual Straight Talk Express.”

    Yet Hodes and other Democrats say that Republicans are vastly overestimating the advantages McCain has from his past. As Ray Buckley, the Democratic state chairman, points out, “The reality is that in January, McCain came in third place.” Hillary Clinton received 112,000 votes in the primary, Obama just under 105,000, and McCain 88,000. Overall, many more voters chose to cast ballots in the Democratic primary than in the Republican primary. The Democratic advantage was 287,000 to 239,000.

    Moreover, Republican support in the state has been crumbling. Democrats swept the state in 2006. Gov. John Lynch was re-elected in a landslide and is heavily favored this year. Hodes and Shea-Porter took the state’s two U.S. House seats away from Republican incumbents. Democrats won both houses of the state Legislature for the first time since 1874.

    Shea-Porter shocked even her own party with her victory over Rep. Jeb Bradley, and polls suggest that she faces a tough contest this year. But she says she’s confident of her chances and Obama’s because discontent in the state is, if anything, stronger than it was in 2006. “The mood is somber, very worried, and people are very frustrated,” she says.

    Fergus Cullen, the Republican state chairman, is remarkably candid about his party’s wounded image, which is why he so values McCain’s reputation for independence. Cullen noted that during a visit to New Hampshire last week, McCain “didn’t use the word Republican once. That’s OK with me. I consider that good politics in this environment.”

    “If the Democrats succeed in framing this election as Bush’s third term or as a referendum on the Republican Party, my party is in big trouble,” Cullen explained. “You remember the scene in the first ‘Star Wars’ when Princess Leia says to Obi-Wan Kenobi, ‘You’re my only hope’? That’s how I feel about John McCain.”
   
    E.J. Dionne’s e-mail address is postchat(at)aol.com.
   
    © 2008, Washington Post Writers Group

Jump to Comments

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By MilwGonzo, June 24, 2008 at 1:40 pm #

“Absolutely, let us all celebrate yet another bought and paid-for presidency”

At least the playing field might be a little more even in 2008 than in the past. However, it’s not trivial that the RNC has boatloads more cash than the DNC.

http://weblogs.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/blo g/2008/06/rnc_cashflush_13_times_dncs_ba.html

It’s no celebration. It’s just a sad fact that, if you want to play, you have to pay and you better have plenty or people and resources. Obama’s got some resources and an organization in 50 states…and he’s going to need it all.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20080623/pl_politico/11263

Report this

By Cloud Nine, June 24, 2008 at 6:46 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Once Marjory Ross’s book hits the stands, the party will be over. Having been found fruitful and rewarding Swift-boating will prevail, even in Connecticut.

Report this

By Conservative Yankee, June 24, 2008 at 3:51 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

By MilwGonzo, June 23 at 6:26 pm

“And, unlike Dukakis in 1988, Obama is going to have a cash advantage over his opponent.”

Absolutely, let us all celebrate yet another bought and paid-for presidency… HOWEVER I do not see where this has any relevance to your polling statement.

People don’t know either Token or G.I. Joe yet. By October, they will think they know them better….

Oh yeah, (scratch scratch)maybe this is where the money plays a part?

Report this

By MilwGonzo, June 23, 2008 at 6:26 pm #

The Hart-Dukakis debacle is not likely to be repeated - of course there’s still 4+ months to go and lots of things can happen.

On the other side, McCain is following an unpopular Bush 41, which isn’t quite the same as an incumbent VP (Bush 39) following a popular Reagan.

And, unlike Dukakis in 1988, Obama is going to have a cash advantage over his opponent.

Report this

By Conservative Yankee, June 23, 2008 at 2:28 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

By MilwGonzo, June 23 at 9:33 am #

“Rasmussen Markets data shows that Democrats are currently given a 88.0 % chance of winning Connecticut’s seven Electoral College votes.”

Yeap, and Dukakis was favored by 17 points according to Rasmussen at this time in 1988

Report this

By MilwGonzo, June 23, 2008 at 9:33 am #

Conservative Yankee: “I’m not even sure Obama can take Connecticut!”

Rasmussen Markets data shows that Democrats are currently given a 88.0 % chance of winning Connecticut’s seven Electoral College votes. Democrats have won the state in four consecutive elections, the last three by double digits. Prior to that, the state voted for the GOP in five straight elections from 1972 to 1988. With release of this poll, Connecticut shifts from “Safely Democratic” to “Likely Democratic” in the Rasmussen Reports Balance of Power calculator.

Just 25% of Connecticut voters say that George W. Bush is doing a good or an excellent job as President. Most—55%—say he is doing a poor job.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/

Report this

By kclaf, June 22, 2008 at 5:51 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Many voters I have talked with are very, very tired of the way the republicans have nearly tanked this country.  As for McCain and his ‘straight talk’ myth…just how many lobbyists are in his campaign stable?  His standing with many of his own constiuents in AZ isn’t very good…..they remember his involvement in the Dine-Navajo ‘resettlement’ for big coal.  This is the kind of information that we are finding online and we do not rely on corporate media to bring this to us.  It’s all out there if you care to look.  As a NH voter I do my homework.

Report this

By Conservative Yankee, June 20, 2008 at 2:36 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

“All politics is local” (Tip O’Neil)

I don’t see either Missouri or New Mexico in the Obama column YET. Pennsylvania is a tricky state in which to do well. You must hold onto the stock owners in the Philly suburbs, and also win some of the workers in the west.  I see McCain taking the people who have profitable investments, and I also see many of the steelworkers, mineworkers, and forced-out lower-management white collar workers going fo0r McCain… Obama’s pro amnesty for illegals will hurt him in Michigan, Ohio, and even in his home state of Illinois.. I’ll bet closer then you think.  Watch Maine… if it goes Republican it will be a bad night for Obama.  I’m not even sure Obama can take Connecticut!

Report this

By MilwGonzo, June 20, 2008 at 9:14 am #

I don’t see it being that close. I think Obama will carry MI, PA, OH, MO, CO and NM. NC and GA could also go for Obama. Even if McCain takes FL, it won’t help. Assuming FL, NC and GA all go to McCain, I see the electoral vote totals this way: Obama 317, McCain 221.

Report this

By Sang Ze, June 20, 2008 at 7:51 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Don’t be so naive. The election has already been decided, and not by the small states, or by any states. The fix is in.

Report this

By Conservative Yankee, June 20, 2008 at 4:50 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Democrats are vastly overestimating the single issue which brought them to power in New Hampshire in 2006.  The war as an issue here (in Northern New England) is fading against a sliding economy Republicans in New Hampshire have a long history of VERY good management of the public purse. Jean Shaheen and her husband have damaged the Democratic party by their slimy tactics (we notice stuff like that here) and John Lynch is not as popular as the above story would have people believe… In fairness to him it’s the worsening national economy which is bringing him down. 

One regional bank failure would end the (VERY SHORT) Democratic tenure in New Hampshire   BUT I’m not sure that would translate into a McCain victory.  Where the author got it right is it is going to be close…. I’d guess closer that 2004.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
Season's Greetings From Truthdig
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.