![]() ![]() |
![]() |
| |
|
The Case for BidenPosted on Jun 9, 2008By E.J. Dionne WASHINGTON—The scene has stayed with me for six years: Democrat Jill Long Thompson, in the midst of a fiercely competitive race in Indiana’s 2nd Congressional District, was being pressed by supporters to criticize what they saw as President Bush’s rush to war in Iraq. She would have none of it, explaining that her differences with Republican Chris Chocola were on domestic economic issues, not foreign policy. In her district, she said later, “we will support our president, and we will support our troops.” It was like that all over the country in 2002: Democrats in large numbers ran away from foreign policy or just said “me, too.” Many went down to defeat, including Long Thompson, though last month she won the Democratic nomination for governor. Things have changed in six years. For one thing, Chocola was voted out in 2006 when frustration over Iraq helped the Democrats sweep to power in the House. Barack Obama is unabashed this year in repeating everywhere he goes that the Iraq war “should never have been authorized and should never have been waged.” But with economic distress so high, and with John McCain claiming national security as his trump card, Democrats may again be tempted to downplay foreign affairs so they can turn the election into a fight over domestic questions about which McCain has had little to say. Evading national security, says Sen. Joe Biden, D-Del., would be a disastrous mistake. “The only way we lose this election is not to engage this issue head-on,” Biden said during an interview in his Capitol office the day after Obama clinched the nomination. Democrats, Biden said, should be “proactive” and not “play defense on foreign affairs” because “the case against McCain and Bush on national security is so overwhelming. ... It should be an essential part of the case for the Democratic nominee.” I visited with Biden since he should be at the top of any list of vice presidential picks for Obama. Why Biden? In part because of where he took our discussion: Few Democrats know more about foreign policy, and few would so relish the fight against McCain on international affairs. Few are better placed to argue that withdrawal from Iraq will strengthen rather than weaken the U.S. The worst thing in a running mate is the fear of muddying his or her image in political combat. Biden would be a happy warrior. He was born in Scranton, Pa., an essential state for Democrats, and has been a regular in the Philadelphia media market. Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell, himself a plausible No. 2, has called Biden “a perfect fit.” The senator has been through two of his own presidential campaigns in which he experienced what an acquaintance of his called the “white hot heat” of scrutiny. Biden is Catholic and hails from a blue-collar world, two constituencies with which Obama needs help. The chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee and the former chairman of the Judiciary Committee, Biden speaks with real learning on international affairs and the judiciary—the next vacancies on the Supreme Court should be a big issue in this campaign—while never sounding like an elitist. But the central reason to pick Biden is the message the choice would send about Obama’s readiness to contest national security issues and his understanding that fixing American foreign policy must be one of the next president’s highest priorities. Biden has been critical of Bush’s approach to Iraq and the world for the right reasons, and from the beginning. In the fall of 2002, he tried, with Republican Sens. Chuck Hagel and Richard Lugar, to pass a more modest war resolution that put additional constraints on Bush. Then-House Democratic leader Richard Gephardt short-circuited the effort by cutting a deal with the president. Even before the war began, Biden was warning of the costs of a lengthy occupation and predicting a decade-long intervention. He is also frank about his misunderstanding of what Bush would do. At one point, he thought Bush was reluctant to start a war. “I vastly underestimated the total incompetence of this crew,” he says. “I could not fathom that they would do what they did under the circumstances they did it.”
To restore its strength and influence, the United States needs to return to the realistic internationalism of FDR, Truman and, yes, the first President Bush. Whether or not Obama picks Biden, he should listen to what Biden is saying. Obama can’t sidestep the foreign policy debate. He has to win it.
Previous item: The Iran Trap Next item: Firing Congress Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment
|
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2008 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved. |
By scottk, June 11 at 11:51 am #
Cyrena, thoust dost bull shit and race bait to much.
Report thisBy scottk, June 11 at 10:39 am #
Here’s a good article about St. Obama of Wall Street:
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/06/11/9558/
Report thisBy scottk, June 11 at 10:35 am #
Ok, I am back to demonizing St. Obama of Wall Street, check this out:
http://www.nysun.com/national/obama-taps-wal-mart
-defender-as-director/79665/
P.S. cyrena, I mentioned McKinney to suggest I don’t care about skin color, I care about progressive issues when I vote unlike you, who says you would be ok with a repug Hagel as veep. But keep up the good work, I am sure you have convinced many people to vote for McCain, given the antics of the Obama supports around here like you, who accuse people they disagree with on issues racist. And yes I attack you, you are closed minded idiot who give real progressives who care about real issues a bad name. You are nothing but a race baiter.
Report thisBy cyrena, June 11 at 9:38 am #
Thou doest protest too much scottie. I didn’t call you a racist, but if the shoe fits, please feel free to wear it in public.
Do you really believe that your ‘maybe’ support of Cynthia McKinney is supposed to ‘fool’ anyone? And do you believe that these kindergarten style attacks on me personally are at all useful? I’m not running for office scottie, so you need not react so vehemently to me. Besides, it takes time away from your mission to demonize Barack Obama.
Now toddle back to your mud pies scottie.
Report thisBy scottk, June 11 at 9:30 am #
Cyrena, if you are interested this article does a nice job of explaining why me and others do not support Obama.
http://www.counterpunch.org/frank06112008.html
Report thisBy scottk, June 11 at 8:27 am #
Cyrena, so now you are implying that i am a racist and that is why i don’t support Obama, it obviously has nothing to do with tepid, centrist pro-corporate positions and vapid rhetoric, no its because i am racist,lol. That must be why it is that i am not sure if i am going to support Nader or McKinney, oh wait that cannot be true i am racist who cannot vote for a black for president. Give me a break, you are a joke, accusing people of racism when they have never uttered anything remotely racist on here, you are some piece of work lent me tell you, you try to sound all high minded and then you post stuff like this you are outrageous, you calling me a racist without a shred of evidence, you ought to be ashamed of yourself. But i suppose i should have seen this coming after all amon drool warned us about you a couple of days ago.
Report thisBy cyrena, June 11 at 7:17 am #
troublesum,
Thanks for the clarification. I just ‘assumed’ (we should never assume, eh) that it was a comment in reference to the author.
The clarification is also good because I’ve paid less attention to everything that has come from Bidens mouth than I have to the stuff that EJ Dionne has written.
Matter of fact, the last time I heard from Biden was probably during the first debates that MSM sponsored. And, there wasn’t much to be gained from them. I also followed his “Partition Plan” that he had going in congress for awhile, for the future of Iraq. Perhaps needless to say, I was annoyed by that, because it was just one of the many overt manifestations of the US arrogance that has chosen to colonize that sovereign state.
I’m sure he believed that he was introducing a proposal designed to dimish the sectarian strife at the time; something that was a KNOWN by-product of ANY hostile take-over/occupation long before it was launched. But, it also served the purpose of locking up the civilian population so as to secure access to the OIL, which was the purpose of the disaster to begin with.
So, I wasn’t anymore impressed with THAT Imperial Plan than I have been with anything else these thugs have done to the place.
And of course, there are STILL far more choices for the VP slot. I’d be OK with Hagel, or any number of others.
Report thisBy scottk, June 11 at 6:40 am #
I was talking about Biden. Should have been obvious to anyone who has been awake the last year.
Report thisBy troublesum, June 10 at 8:21 pm #
cyrena
Report thisIt was Biden, not Dionne, who referred to Obama as being “clean” when he was asked about the prospects of a black man winning the nomination.
By cyrena, June 10 at 12:24 pm #
By scottk, June 10 at 11:22 am ."this is the guy who said people are excited about Obama because he was a black candidate who was fresh and clean.”
Scottk, I dont remember EJ Dionne suggesting this, in this PARTICULAR CONTEXT! And, I generally read most of EJ Dionnes work, not just on this site, but on others where hes also published. So, do you have anything that we could refer back to?
Now Im only putting this question out there because just as I read nearly all of the comments posted here, Ive obviously read your as well. From just a week or less of doing that, Ive come to the conclusion that you are the one of the latest editions to the Barack Obama haters. There are several who post here; some more obvious than others.
Im sure that you all have varying reasons for your animosity toward Senator Obama, and would be horrified to have him as the POTUS. There might even be less than a handful of you who have those concerns UNRELATED to the fact that Senator Obama is African-American, but I also suspect that YOU are not one of them. So, we know that, and I just thought Id let you know, that we know that. OK?
Now AMOUNG the many reasons that millions of American are excited about Senator Obamas candidacy, is the fact that he is fresh, as youve chosen to quote EJ, (correctly or not). He is fresh in terms of offering a better and more efficient way for the government to respond to the needs of the American people. Something that weve not had in decades. If youre using the word clean (whether EJ ever has or not) that would be evidenced by the fact that he is a relative outsider to the Washington political machine/elite, and unbound by any ties that may convey any of the backroom, old-dynasty connections that have long enveloped so many of the movers and shakers with their corporate and other ties. In other words, he has no baggage and can stand the scrutiny.
The fact that he is black, (which you included with fresh and clean as reasons for the excitement he has generated) has little or nothing to do with it, unless one happens to be hung-up or otherwise obsessed with race over personhood. It is ONLY important in the sense that a nearly 300 year old country, established on a foundation of racism, and a long sustained hold on that mentality, has finally spoken out in such a way as to display, to ourselves and the rest of the world, that we are ready to move beyond such crippling pathologies in our national psyche.
Obviously, not ALL of us have arrived at that point yet, but enough of us have. And, were waiting for the rest of you to catch up.
Report thisBy scottk, June 10 at 11:57 am #
http://www.progressive.org/mag_reed0508
this article is great you all have to check it out.
Report thisBy scottk, June 10 at 11:55 am #
More evidence of what change really means to Obama and you suckers thought he was the messiah or something. Have fund convincing people to support this corporate sell out.
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/06/10/9534/
Report thisBy scottk, June 10 at 11:22 am #
this is the guy who said people are excited about Obama because he was a black candidate who was fresh and clean.
Report thisBy felicity, June 10 at 11:18 am #
For a few decades now, vices have been chosen close to convention time. The earliest recently was Edwards who was chosen 20 days before. May be wise to use the time before convention to determine weak and/or strong areas in the campaign and then choose accordingly.
Report thisBy Jonas South, June 10 at 10:59 am #
Do-nothing Biden? Rove roll-over Biden? No change is good change, Biden? Is Dionne daft? How can Obama represent change if he has at his elbow, a heart-beat away, a man who represents nothing but the old way, smiling his way through Saturday morning talk-show after talk show, never putting his dainty foot down, never calling Bush’s buff, while the latter tortures, kills, and lies?
Report thisBy troublesum, June 10 at 9:59 am #
Did anyone watch the interview with Admiral Fallon on this page? He would make a great running mate for Obama.
Report thisBy scottk, June 10 at 7:23 am #
When it comes to protecting, nurturing and doing the bidding of the banks, insurance, and credit card companies their are none second to Biden.
Report thisBy Sullen Susy, Proud Member of ARMY-M, June 10 at 6:08 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
I strongly agree with the message of this piece, and strongly disagree with Purple Girl. Not to be antagonistic, but to say that Real Democrats are color blind doesn’t make sense. to choose to be in one party or another is to choose a color...unless I have missed something. True Americans (whoever those are) should be color blind, on a number of levels, but let us true Democrats continue hating the the Republicans for their delusional belief that small government is the best way too let the country slip into disrepair. Beyond this Hagel is not the guy any Democrat...or any person should want for Vice President. First of all his record has been incredibly conservative (Rated 12% by APHA, indicating a anti-public health voting record, Rated 11% by the NAACP, indicating an anti-affirmative-action stance, Rated 87% by the US COC, indicating a pro-business voting record, Rated 100% by the NRLC, indicating a pro-life stance, Rated 17% by the CAF, indicating opposition to energy independence, Rated 8% by the AFL-CIO, indicating an anti-union voting record, Rated 0% by the AU, indicating opposition to church-state separation, Rated 22% by the ARA, indicating an anti-senior voting record, Rated 0% by the CTJ, indicating opposition to progressive taxation, and I would continue but I’m starting to get disgusted). So not only would he continually undermine a Obama White House from the inside, but would also be setting the Republicans up to win in the next cycle. Susy no-like bad medicine.
Biden would be perfect for the spot, though he has serious problems of his own, he is a hard liner who would be able to help Obama’s agenda get achieved.
Report thisBy Conservative Yankee, June 10 at 5:38 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Look, there is no question that no one should be picked for their race or gender, BUT if the Democrats wish to win in the fall, Michigan Governor JENNIFER M. GRANHOLM has the economic expertise Obama needs. She also HAPPENS to be female.
While I’m not sure it is a good idea to give one party the whole show, I’m becoming increasingly disenchanted with John Mc Cain.
Well, guess we’ll just have to wait and see.
Report thisBy TheIndyVoice.com, June 10 at 5:09 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
To be able to recognize the Bush/Republican catastrophe when you see is not solid foreign policy judgment and experience. Joe Biden is a mediocre centrist who voted for the war in the 1st place and advocates splitting Iraq into 3 separate parts. That’s absolutely ludicrous and begs for other countries in the region to become involved not to mention that it nearly guarantees future U.S. involvement.
Obama must select someone outside of the group-think in Washington (like that exhibited by Dionne). He must select someone with proven diplomatic and executive skills that will unite the Party. Governor Bill Richardson of New Mexico is a 2-term very popular governor, U.S. ambassador to the U.N., U.S. Secretary of Energy (under Bill Clinton) and has negotiated the release of hostages in North Korea, Iraq and Cuba. He’s smart, practical, low key and has more experience than any President of the last 40 years. He’s also multi-ethnic and hails from a swing state with one of the smallest Republican margins of victory. He would be the perfect choice for V.P. but I’m sure you won’t be hearing his name mentioned in conversations coming out of the mouths of the D.C. Democratic pundit losers of the past.
Report thisBy Purple Girl, June 10 at 3:18 am #
Biden is a great Senator- but carries with him more baggae then we need. Plus he doesn’t cut the legs out from Under mcCain, Nor help finally rid the Red half of their Criminals- once & for All.
Obama has laid down th eGauntlet for the DNC and His fellow Democrats, We need one from the other side to help achieve the same result.
Give Biden Secretary of State…
Give the VP to Sen Chuck Hagel- then watch Mac implode and the Neo Cons run like rats of a sinking ship.
I miss my old formdiable Foes who used to be the ‘tight wads’ the ‘Small Gov’t ‘ brigade.Let’s help the Republican Party return to being Run by Public Servants and NOT the Corps TOO!REAL Democrats are Color Blind when it comes to True Patriotism.
OBAMA/HAGEL ‘08
Report this