![]() |
|
||
|
Hillary’s Graceful ExitPosted on Jun 9, 2008Hillary Rodham Clinton’s speech Saturday conceding the Democratic presidential nomination to Barack Obama couldn’t have been classier—and couldn’t have been more auspicious for the party’s chances of capturing the White House in November. It might have taken her a few days, but she delivered. Big-time. It’s no secret that I’ve found plenty of fault with the way Clinton, her staff and her husband, Bill, ran their campaign. But I can’t find a thing wrong with the way she ended it, delivering a gracious and stirring address beneath the soaring, faux-marble columns of the National Building Museum. She chose one of Washington’s grandest interior spaces for her valedictory, and her words lived up to the setting. All morning, the Republican National Committee had been sending out e-mails highlighting the nasty things Clinton and Obama had said about each other and predicting that “Democrat Party disunity” would sweep John McCain to victory. Republicans must have been hoping that Clinton would reprise her performance of last Tuesday night, when she failed to acknowledge that Obama had clinched the nomination. The intensity of the campaign and the divisions it created were evident Saturday when, well into the speech, Clinton first mentioned her opponent’s name, calling on supporters to “take our energy, our passion, our strength, and do all we can to help elect Barack Obama the next president of the United States.” There were cheers, but also some boos. Clinton went on to praise Obama, but not in terms so lavish that she might have sounded disingenuous—it was, after all, a heated campaign that got personal at times—and proceeded to build a cogent argument for party unity. She began by listing the core issues that Democrats care about: shared economic prosperity, universal health care, civil rights, labor rights, ending the war in Iraq. She mentioned “the Supreme Court” without elaboration, because none was required; everyone understood she was saying that McCain, if elected, almost certainly would have the opportunity to complete the conservative transformation of the court. Advertisement During the campaign, she had mocked Obama’s signature slogan as pie in the sky, countering with her own cry of “Yes, we will.” By using Obama’s words, she was making clear that there was nothing ambiguous about her support. In many ways, I thought that the most important part of the speech was the section in which she talked about being the first woman to have had a realistic chance of becoming president. It had been easy, at times, to lose sight of just how historic Clinton’s candidacy was. Her greatest success in the campaign came when she fully embraced her role as a pioneer who spoke for the aspirations of women, who ran as “a daughter who benefited from opportunities my mother never dreamed of” and “a mother who worries about my daughter’s future.” Then she spoke directly to the women who constituted her most devoted and reliable base of support: “When you hear people saying, or think to yourself, ‘If only,’ or, “What if,’ I say, please, don’t go there. Every moment wasted looking back keeps us from moving forward.” She had done all she could do to leave her supporters no wiggle room—to give them no permission to dwell on incidents of sexism, to create no space for reservations about Obama, to eliminate any excuse for sitting out the fall campaign. It’s true that actions speak louder than words, so we’ll see how Clinton makes good on her pledge to “work my heart out to make sure that Sen. Obama is our next president.” But I find it hard to imagine how Clinton’s words could have been more definitive. Her delivery was sensational, too. I thought back to the early primaries, when Clinton’s stump speech was little more than a wonkish list of proposals. This time, she had total command of her material and her audience, total command of the moment. From now on, whenever an oratorical performance is described as Clintonesque, the adjective will refer not only to Bill, who stood nearby and beamed with pride, but also to Hillary. I couldn’t help thinking that if the polished, passionate candidate we watched bow out on Saturday had emerged in time to compete in Iowa, things might have turned out differently. But I’ll do as Clinton asked. I won’t go there. CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment |
We just got faster!
Our site is growing, and we’ve upgraded our servers to bring you a better, faster Truthdig experience.
We’re thrilled with our improvement — but it’s added a lot to our costs. Please help us to keep things snappy and make sure you have instant access to thousands of in-depth Truthdig articles, interviews, videos and cartoons.
Please chip in today with a gift to keep us moving forward. Then check out the site for yourself!
By Inherit The Wind, June 14, 2008 at 8:25 am #
Maybe because Im a McCain supporter?
As an aside, this site is like the Northeast power grid on the verge of collapse. no more reply buttons, the comment title does not work, and only 1/4 of my messages are (eventually) published.
Maybe its time to find a new site.
CY:
I don’t know if you are pulling my leg or really are a McSame supporter. I do know that the Gitmo decision by the USSC highlights how important it is to have a Democratic President to offset 40 years of insane appointments, like Scalia, Thomas, Alito and Roberts.
There is a site: Huffingtonpost.com, but it suffers from TOO MANY posts that it is inundating.
Report thisBy Conservative Yankee, June 13, 2008 at 9:29 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
ITW
“How did you manage to miss that part? Thats like finding a feather on the turkey and missing the drumstick!
Maybe because I’m a McCain supporter?
As an aside, this site is like the Northeast power grid… on the verge of collapse. no more “reply” buttons, the “comment title” does not work, and only 1/4 of my messages are (eventually) published.
Maybe it’s time to find a new site.
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, June 12, 2008 at 11:27 pm #
We see the world through different glasses. I disagree with just about every scintilla of your thought process. That says nothing about your correctness or lack of it, but when a great speech has 23 variations of the word I used through out, I do question your judgement.
That is your right, though our current usurper and his hatchet-man would gladly take it from both of us.
At first I thought as you did—HRC TOTALLY alienated me in this campaign, with her stupid fear tactics, her un-called-for low blows against BO, and, finally, her demonstrated ineptness as an administrator as her campaign spun out of control and she squandered what should have been an insurmountable lead.
But further reflection showed that her speech was intended to lead her adamant Obama-angered followers down the garden path, past the point of no return. She needed to get ‘em all worked up on the things she worked for (or they think she worked for), and then HAMMER THEM with the fact that ONLY by being true to the Democratic Party can those things happen.
What she so eloquently said was what EVERY sibling knows: “Nobody beats up my brother, Nobody…Nobody but me!”
The intenecine fight is over, she iterated and reiterated: Now the REAL battle is engaged for the very soul of America and we need to stick together if She’s to be saved.
She warmed them up, got them hot and bothered, and then showed them there’s only ONE way to go if you really, really believe in what her campaign issues were—and that’s now to fight as hard for Barack Obama.
How did you manage to miss that part? That’s like finding a feather on the turkey and missing the drumstick!
Report thisBy GoldenT, June 12, 2008 at 5:23 pm #
It was a wonderful speech Senator Clinton gave. Looking forward to her nomination at the convention.
Report thisBy Conservative Yankee, June 12, 2008 at 8:15 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
“Inherit The Wind, June 11 at 6:10 pm “
We see the world through different glasses. I disagree with just about every scintilla of your thought process. That says nothing about your correctness or lack of it, but when a “great speech” has 23 variations of the word “I” used through out, I do question your judgement.
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, June 11, 2008 at 10:10 pm #
ITW Please dont refer to others as uninformed or idiots when making statements like this:
There is no POSSIBLE way Hillary Clinton could have been MORE definitive in how she through her complete and total support behind Barack Obama.
There is a way she could have been more definitive in her support, she could have released her delegates and told them to support Obama.
First: I said “Ignorant” and it was in context of not comprehending what “suspend my campaign means.” I stand by that. To attack her for that is the height of ignorance.
Second: some people are never happy. She could have committed suicide to make sure nobody’d think she’d run and someone like YOU would say “She should have done more.” The point is, no matter WHAT Hillary Clinton does, you will criticize it. Therefore your “analysis” of her actions is both predictable and meaningless.
Frankly, I do not believe we have a candidate running who is worth more than a half-cup of dog-shit,
Yeah, right. Let’s have Ron Paul, the secret anti-semitic fascist, running against Dennis Kucinich, the looniest politician since Governor Moonbeam himself. (Yawn) Same old, same old.
BUT Hill is the lowest, filthiest entity in my life time to achieve the adoration she has from her supporters. Even Pat Buchanan, Richard Nixon, and LBJ pale in comparison.
Richard Nixon’s evil is so vast that it saddens me that you have forgotten it. Only President Mussolini seriously surpasses the man who gave us the “Enemies List”, a stolen election, “Law and Order” (meaning stomping on Blacks), and “If the President does it, it isn’t illegal”—now the mantra of our fascist White House.
Clinton is just an ordinary smarmy pol with a great speech last Saturday.
Yea
Report thisBy patcy2000, June 11, 2008 at 4:49 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
As Obama Turns—
Report thisIt’s happeneing—little by little
more everyday—
You won’t recognize him by the end of this general
election
CHANGE is right—change from what he said yesterday
and the day before—
But I forgot—he never did say exactly what—“Change”
really meant-
By MackTN, June 11, 2008 at 9:46 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Anyone listening to Hillary and other women bemoaning their lack of progress or inability to cross barriers would think that they are a miserably oppressed group, excluded from board rooms and political assemblies, third class citizens discriminated against in the workplace and the payroll dept. I listened to news media all morning wax poetic about the women’s movement and Hillary’s emblematic leadership there. “Why didn’t she do this earlier?”
But of course Obama can’t respond in kind without stirring up issues of negativity and grievance.
I regarded her speech as narcissistic and political, a distorted view of her candidacy as it relates to historical events and current developments. Hillary has created deep divisions that served her ambitions, and I hope that doesn’t bode ill for the November election. This mess is really her doing; her job is to clean it up.
Report thisBy Conservative Yankee, June 11, 2008 at 8:47 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
ITW Please don’t refer to others as uninformed or idiots when making statements like this:
“There is no POSSIBLE way Hillary Clinton could have been MORE definitive in how she through her complete and total support behind Barack Obama.”
There is a “way” she could have been more “definitive” in her support, she could have released her delegates and told them to support Obama.
Frankly, I do not believe we have a candidate running who is worth more than a half-cup of dog-shit, BUT Hill is the lowest, filthiest entity in my life time to achieve the adoration she has from her supporters. Even Pat Buchanan, Richard Nixon, and LBJ pale in comparison.
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, June 10, 2008 at 11:28 pm #
First of all, she has only said she is suspending her campiagn. And she has said that several times. She has never said that she is quitting nor has she ever said she has conceded. My instincts tell me she is poised in the wings, hanging like a giant vampire bat in the rafters, ready to swoop down on the stage in Denver at the first opportunity.
This is about as ignorant as you can get. “Suspend” is the necessary legal term that allows her to continue to pay staff and raise money to pay off the campaign debts. In 2004, John Edwards “suspended” his campaign and THAT campaign is still, technically, still open. Mitt Romney “suspended” his campaign as did all the other GOP and Dems that fell by the wayside this season.
Everyone who follows politics knows that “suspend” unequivocally means “end”, only with the right to pay staff and beg for money to retire debt. No more. Nothing nefarious. Hillary didn’t have to say “concede” just to please YOU—she did far more than that. She saved her career and reputation in the Party by saying there is NO way ANY of her supporters can justify NOT supporting Barack Obama to be our next President. As Robinson said, she left them NO wiggle-room.
There is no POSSIBLE way Hillary Clinton could have been MORE definitive in how she through her complete and total support behind Barack Obama.
Period.
Report thisBy Emma, June 10, 2008 at 5:32 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Not to be all “omg hillary clinton post, let me plug my feminist event!” but it is an interesting time to be a woman in the United States and Living Liberally is hosting an evening of political comedy with Planned Parenthood this Wednesday. If you’re in the New York area, you should stop by (6:30 for Happy Hour, 7:30 for the comedy) and mingle with like-minded people while seeing some good comedy. We’re at the Tank (279 Church Street, btwn Franklin & White, below Canal). Visit http://www.laughingliberally.com for more info.
Report thisBy J. Mezure Carter, June 10, 2008 at 2:42 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
I have to admit that I only heard sound bites from Hillarys speech, you know the bit that included 18 million cracks in the glass ceiling statement. I like to refer to a New York Times article that reveals how the Clinton marriage has so influenced our political arena for the past twenty years. The Times article mentions how Bill Clinton begins to exert more influence on his wifes campaign. At one point in a playful mood, Bill has Gov. Rendell reporting the PA results county-by-county, in order to highlight that he was more successful than she for getting votes. I am sure that this same exercise could have been done in Ohio, Texas, West Virginia and Kentucky. No reporter, not even those who were against her, ever took into consideration that Hillary was not running alone. Bills involvement resulted in dragging her kicking and screaming into the win column. Im sure she would love to have accomplished those 18 million votes on her own, but I can assure you that a large percentage of them were not woman putting cracks in the so-called glass ceiling. They were men voting for Bills wife. A wife that they surely felt he could keep in line. Why hasnt the press acknowledged this reality? Why wasnt Bills contribution included in the parsing of the voters into the silly identity groups? Have not we acknowledged when relatives of other ex-presidents attempted to run for office? The beauty of Obamas win is that he won the primary by defeating both of them in spite of their tactics. Also I think he won because of the underlying competitive disposition that has colored the Clinton’s marriage. And I think she lost for the same reason.
Report thisBy Sue Cook, June 10, 2008 at 1:04 pm #
Why do you now find it chivalrous to write such a piece on Hillary when last week you had nothing good to say about her?
Is is because she has finally done what you, the powers at be and the MSM has wanted to her to do since Iowa?
Are you really that pleased by what she said and how she said it, as opposed to why the speech was given in the first place?
I’m sorry, but I can’t find your (feigned?) bubbly enthusiasm over her this week credible, since before she was pushed out, you found her to be so intolerable.
Report thisBy cyrena, June 10, 2008 at 11:35 am #
I see that we can thank Mr. Robinson, (as usual) for an excellent piece! I can appreciate his commendation and recognition of what Sen. Clinton did indeed put together, to address the nation last Saturday.
In a stand alone context, it can be fairly and admirably be defined as a ‘graceful exit’. It does not ‘undue’ the bad mistakes, choices, etc that both she and her campaign exhibited over the past year, but she knows that as well as anyone, and there’s nothing to be gained from dwelling on it at this point. Lessons should be learned from it, and I hope that we ALL have.
But, lessons should be learned from the fact that she managed to get it together at the end, and do the right thing.
The rest is on us.
Report thisBy Ivan Hentschel, June 10, 2008 at 10:44 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Hill’s “Saturday Morning Live” performance was far and away her best ever. But she has much to atone for and lots of explaining to do. If she indeed has the “right stuff”, we need to see evidence of it, soon.
First of all, she has only said she is “suspending” her campiagn. And she has said that several times. She has never said that she is “quitting’ nor has she ever said she has “conceded”. My instincts tell me she is poised in the wings, hanging like a giant vampire bat in the rafters, ready to swoop down on the stage in Denver at the first opportunity.
Secondly, all we have from her so far, as regards support for Obama, is some eloquent rhetoric. Since she has no money, I’d like to see her put her actions where her mouth is. It remains to be seen if she will kick up any campaign trail dust in earnest.
Lastly, if, as many predict she might, she comes up with the chutzpah and sheer gall to ask Obama to help her pay off her multi-million dollar campaign debt, we’ll know this was a sham performance.
The one situation I do not want to find myself in is being held in “suspension”, by a bankrupt hot-air balloon, and a self-annointed presidential incumbent wanna-be. I am far from convinced by one speech. One good base hit doesn’t get you credit for a game-winning home run.
Given the chance, and given her record, she will spoil the party if she can.
Report thisBy Conservative Yankee, June 10, 2008 at 9:28 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Only a long-term supporter of the token candidate could call this outrageous performance “classy”.
It is the in thing today to do a quick “surface refinish” when “mending bridges” so myopic and self serving is what passes in our lap dog press for a political system, they have stopped doing the hard work such as counting the 23 “I’s” in various tenses the business shill spit out during her concession speech.
The pundants gush crocodile tears of sorrow for “poor abused Hillary” while failing to mention her possible job security status. Hey folks, this ain’t some laid-off steel worker who must now be trained to flip burgers at Mickey D’s. She now has offers at Citi-group, her over 200K Senate seat, and if she feels like going on vacation she has 150 million to take her anywhere she wants to go in the comfort & style she has always enjoyed… Oh yeah, I know, that 20 Million dollar campaign debt she moans about… That’s a seperate entity (under corporate law,) and if she chooses, she can declare bankruptcy in her campaign organization, and not feel it in her personal life..
For me “Graceful exits” come at personal cost. Graceful allows admission of mistakes while truly abandoning current ambitions. The corporate whore (who financed the end of her campaign on the largess of Big banks and Wall Street who forgave and postponed debt service) admitted no mistakes, and has surely left the door open to a convention fight by keeping control of “HER” DELEGATES.” Maybe she is still dreaming about a RFK style assassination.
So bring it on, Tell me I’m “anti woman” tell me that “Hillary haters” are defacto “sexists” I guess the possibility exists, I will tell you one thing, the women who influenced my life, taught me how to be a man, cuddled me when I was sick and told me where the dog died when I was wrong these women bare no resemblance to the business-shill or her minions.
Oh yeah, and of all the women in my life who still remain alive and ready to vote in the fall NONE was ever a business-shill supporter. My Aunt (age 87) calls her “The junk-yard dog”
Report thisBy Maezeppa, June 10, 2008 at 8:54 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Hillary Clinton only got better and better as a candidate—and that’s in addition to winning every single debate. It’s a shame Eugene Robinson treated Clinton with such shameless savagery and Obama with such fawning adoration. America is not well-served by such overweening adoration of one candidate over another when two such worthy ones are running.
Report thisBy Purple Girl, June 10, 2008 at 6:57 am #
Case in Point- failure to truely push for an Exit Plan.She faned indignation..but then let it go.
Report thisShe is still responsible for the failure to Provide Oversight for our Military’s Deployment, readiness,safety, and follow up care.the Armed Service Committe was a group of Senators who were Derelict in their assigned Duty.
She’d bitch about W’s actions then vote to help proliferate them. ‘War Funding’ is a sore point with me even in regards to Sen Obama.
Not to mention failing to use her ‘Political Clout’ to help push others towards Impeachment. She has said Nothing about such Articles of Impeachment coming up from Congressman Kucinich in the House.why did she NOT help with at least her voice to get the Dem Representatives Moving on this Action?Seh of all in either House could have made a major Push to get this Necessary Step started.the only way we arre going to be able to regain any creditablity or control over our Gov’t is by holding them Accountable for their actions. Her silence alone was cause for concern,then her voting record, then her McCain reverence,her deceitful campaign tactics…Did she ever Use the Word ‘Concede’ in her Speech? Or just ‘suspending’...those 3 RFK comments still send shivers up my spine.
Sorry Eugene- But I can not Pat her on her Back for 35 yrs of Bullshit politics and national decay, I can not forgive her silence not her dereliction of duty, I can Not turn a blind eye nor deaf ear to her Lies and innuendos, I cna Not change my feelings I have had about her for the last 6 yrs, Just from One Speech she gave on One Day.
Note I was a 2 time Bill Voter and Defender of Both throughout the ‘90’s - I now send My sincerest Apologies to all those who I debated with regarding their ‘opportunism’, ‘Arrogance’ and ‘Shady Deals’. I will NEVER trust the Clintons Again.
I’m also a White,Blue collar Female of Scotch Irish Descent living in Michigan (a Rigged primary- BY the Clintons)