![]() |
|
| |
|
The Populist UprisingPosted on Jun 5, 2008By David Sirota American history is the history of populist uprisings. From the Revolutionary War to the coalfield wars, from labor organizers to anti-tax crusaders, from the New Deal to the current conservative era, backlashes to the status quo have defined every major political era. These uprisings have given us candidates from Goldwater to Dean, and presidents from Roosevelt to Reagan—and the populist uprising that delivered Barack Obama the Democratic presidential nomination means history could be forged once again. What are populist uprisings? Loosely defined, they are a welling up of anger toward the established order—revolts that are often the precursor to a full-fledged social movement. The uprising against inequality during the Great Depression fueled the labor movement and the New Deal, which raised wages and created the middle class. The uprising against Jim Crow laws in the 1960s became the civil rights movement, which made America more equal. The uprising against liberalism during the late 1970s became the conservative movement of the 1980s, which deregulated the economy and fed the military-industrial complex. It is that rebellion three decades ago that tells us we are indeed experiencing another uprising. Just like the late 1970s, America currently faces the telltale signs of all insurrections: an economic emergency, a financial meltdown, an energy crisis and a national security quagmire. Political analysts say this is bad news for the right because George W. Bush sits atop today’s mess, and conservatives have responded by running away from the president and by attempting to channel the outrage into their old anti-tax, anti-immigrant, anti-government agenda. But that misunderstands what has changed. According to Gallup’s survey data, the public has not only lost confidence in the political system, as it did in the late 1970s, but also in corporations. In 1979, one in three Americans told Gallup’s pollsters they had confidence in big business. By 2007, a little less than one in five expressed the same confidence. In 1979, almost two out of three citizens said they had faith in banks. Today, only two out of five say the same thing. This is the real problem for a conservative movement that has become a wholly owned subsidiary of corporate America. Unlike 1980, when Ronald Reagan rode the conservative uprising to a landslide victory, the country is not looking for a movement that gets the government to back off big business, nor are we looking for politicians who pretend the Enrons and Bear Stearnses are victims. This uprising is searching for a movement that gets big business back under control and leaders who are serious about aiming “law and order” rhetoric not at dark-skinned people, but at the royalists whose greed is driving the economy into the ground. As I found in reporting my new book, “The Uprising,” some already recognize this new political topography. For instance, New York’s Working Families Party has become a powerful grassroots force for economic justice in Wall Street’s backyard. Unions have boosted their membership by the largest margin in a quarter-century. Shareholder activists are finding more support for initiatives that challenge corporate misbehavior. Even some Republicans like Mike Huckabee have bashed CEOs and berated lobbyist-written trade policies. Whether this ferment becomes a transpartisan social movement will depend on a number of questions. Will the Democratic Party stop demoralizing its grassroots base and break free of its moneyed faction that gave us travesties like NAFTA? Will mavericks like Huckabee reshape the GOP? And most importantly, is the presidential election hype going to trick Americans into believing candidates are social movements, rather than one of many vehicles for them? The answers will determine whether this is a fleeting uprising of ineffective protest or a movement about wielding power—yet another forgotten moment or, finally, a historic one. David Sirota is a best-selling author whose newest book, “The Uprising,” will be released this month. He is a fellow at the Campaign for America’s Future and a board member of the Progressive States Network—both nonpartisan organizations. His blog is at www.credoaction.com/sirota. © 2008 Creators Syndicate Inc. TAGS:
|
By mill, June 9, 2008 at 8:48 pm #
really don’t get it when lefties beat up on NAFTA. It hasn’t had the large US employment hit that Ross Perot predicted; it hasn’t been an amazing tool for economic growth in Mexico or Canada either. It seems to have shuffled the deck for very specific groups, like auto assembly and tomato growers - dramatically. But it hasn’t had some of the mega-effects that opponents suspected it would.
The biggest flaw in NAFTA-like experiences is that capital gets the sort of playing field they seek, but labor rules and community ecology (e.g., local pollution rules) were ignored.
We should fix that. But lowering trade barriers - with some fairness and balance (ugggh sounds like Fox network) is good for most people.
Report thisBy Blackspeare, June 7, 2008 at 2:04 pm #
It should also be mentioned that this presidential election has another serious facet and that is the Supreme Court. The next president will nominate at least two new justices. Already there are at least three sitting justices who would like to wear Roe v. Wade as party hats. If the conservative wins the election you might just see RvW overturned and that will return the ball back to the individual states where the right-to-life folks have a little more sway. And then instead of one national fight you’ll have 50 different fights——more fodder for the talking heads!!!
Report thisBy PatrickHenry, June 7, 2008 at 10:44 am #
Populist Uprising:
The last resort of the citizens before the “elected” government takes over via diebold.
Report thisBy Purple Girl, June 7, 2008 at 9:20 am #
There is a real debate that must be pushed in the Womens movement and the ‘European’ descent race. Isuggest any one who does not personlly have a’dog’ in this fight - get The Hell out of the Way!
Report thisI am personally taking on my fellow ‘vaginas’ to prove they are actually interested in Equal Rights.Or are they more interested in “Pay Backs a bitch?” Hillary and Her campaign tactics pissed me off to my core!I want to be able to compete on a level playing field to prove I am the ‘best person for the Job’ I do not want special priviledges, treatment or rules changed to Help me. Keep the Bar at the same Height (if not a little raised to prove I’ve earned My place at the table- undeniable capabilities)
As for Race I demand to Know How any American of European Descent intentionally partake in Prejudice and Discrimination when OUR ancestors came to this Country to End such bigotry against Them??? How can we Honor their Sacrifics if we deny those Rights and freedoms for Anyone else? How dare You spit on their efforts, sacrifics, Dreams, vision of this Country!You dishonor OUR ancestors with such small minded, special privieldge doctrines.
The way I Honor My Ancestors is by NOT subjecting Others to the Prejudices and Discrimaination they had to endure to provide such an opportunity for their Descendants. My Scotch Irish, Italian and Luthuanian Worked too hard - gave up too much to allow such travesty to still survive in this Country.
I suggest many return to the study of history to come to the realization they are now practicing what all those who came before US suffered Under!
By i,Q, June 7, 2008 at 1:02 am #
Oops, i just found some info in the “Voter Suppression” thread from the Truthdig Webmaster which clarifies in detail the position of the staff regarding user submitted comments and also a short reply to Gramma Concept who had asked about the reply function mentioned in my previous post. It was causing the long delays in loading the pages, so they have temporarily disabled that feature.
OK, so i got a little reactionary. Sorry about that, but i am still starting a diary at the Kos too.
Report thisBy i,Q, June 7, 2008 at 12:49 am #
What the heck is going on here at Td? First commenters (i heard it from Expat first and now alicecbrown) report that comments are being censored for content, now the “reply to this” button is disabled along with the comment title.
TruthDig, are you intentionally trying to discourage conversation? Not only is this ethically irresponsible for a site whose very name implies sharing of ideas and facts, it is stupid from an ad revenue perspective. Less conversing means less reloads means less views.
i think i’ll be finding a new place to play. DailyKos maybe? If anyone else wants to join me, read my diary over there: iQ
Oh yeah, Go Sirota! i am stoked to be an active part of this uprising.
See y’all later. Or maybe not.
Report thisBy geronimo, June 6, 2008 at 11:37 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Well wadayaknow, the impeachment of Bush/Cheney turns out to be our ultimate litmus test. For what? Changing the world, that’s what.
Report thisBy alicecbrown, June 6, 2008 at 4:07 pm #
In one of his novels, Gore Vidal mentions that as the various religions rise and fall in credulity, (E.g, Thor, the Sun, Allah), there is a period between each religious era that is chaos. Why? Because the people have lost belief in this something outside of themselves. We are in that era now, protestations to the contrary simply being more proof.
Report thisMy son tells me that the 10 Commandments are just one of many similar sets of rules that man has found necessary to follow in order to live in community. The fact that we the people trust no one in business today testifies to how the outsourcing of our industry and the lying of our CEOs has conspired together to, in the long run, bring the American Empire to a crashing halt. Let’s just hope that the transition to another belief system or No. 1 nation can occur without destroying the species, our species.
By Paracelsus, June 6, 2008 at 3:51 pm #
http://rawstory.com/rawreplay/?p=1210
The Bilderberg Conference is reputed to be held in Chantilly, Virginia this year. Barak Obama’s press secreatary had told reporters that he would be leaving from Dulles Airport in VA to Chicago. So a crowd of reports were waylaid into a flight to Chicago, while Obama disappeared elsewhere. One report is saying that Clinton and Obama are going to be maeeting with Feinstein in Virginia. Perhaps the Bilderbergers will appoint Ms. Clinton as Obama’s VP. It is very suspicious to see a press core apparently lied into taking a flight to Chicago toward no good purpose. The Obama group did no have to mislead the reporters. Something stinks.
Report thisBy alicecbrown, June 6, 2008 at 3:05 pm #
Tell me, dear student, how many subjective terms do you identify in the following evaluation criteria on this site for ‘what is acceptable’:
personal attacks on our writers or readers
excessive profanity
racist, sexist or other discriminatory or hateful language
statements that may be construed as urging attacks on political leaders, officials, security forces or civilians—American or otherwise
comments that are off-topic or irrelevant to the story or discussion at hand
comments disclosing personal information about Truthdig writers or fellow commenters
entries “signed” by someone other than the actual author
Here’s a start: ‘excessive profanity’: Shit is OK, but Bullshit is not?
‘off-topic’: closed Town Hall meetings by the Repulsicans is not OK, but the mass murder of over 4000 Americans is?
‘irrevelant to the subject at hand’: In whose eye? Who are the silent Orwellian censors who must OK every posting? I am a co-ordinator of the Gore Vidal group, and I finally had to go to moderating the site, when some started using it as a porno sales tool. But absolutely nothing else gets censored off the Gore_Vidal Yahoo Groups. In keeping with GV’s philosophy as well as my own.
And eliminating a comment because a ‘bunch’ (define how many, por favor) have decided to ‘Report This’ is so asinine I have no words for it. Stand forth, and identify yourself.
Report thisBy pdennany, June 6, 2008 at 12:42 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Dream on! While it is true that the People are raising up, and hopefully there will be a concintratrated all inclusive movement. The helter skelter uprising now in motion may do in only a modest few, while the mainstream media will continue to only publish what the corporations allow. I hope that there will be no real change, and justice to the treasonous crimes that have exploded on us over the past 7 plus years do not simply be eased into the past without full exclosure and carried to their rightful punishing end. The VietNam slaugher was never punished. The JFK and RFK murders were never given a real investigation. The attack on the USS Liberty was never punished. The Iran/Contra weapons for drugs deals were covered up. The first Gulf was was made happen based on lies. The Invasion on Afghanistan was based on lies! Bin Laden had nothing at all to do with 9-11, and the 9-11 Commission covered up the truth. The Invasion on Iraq was a complete scam based completely on lies. Will those that told the lies and intentionally twisted intelligence ever be challanged honestly in a real court. Our present “leaders” say no. What do we stand for? Isn’t murder committed by an individual not involved in politice punished for his crime? Why is the murder of many hundreds of thousands of innocent people we killed in the Middle Eastbased on lies of the Bush Regime. The uprising must stand all the way up, and put a stop to these continuing crimes. They will continue until we follow through and put thes hidious terrorist to the ultimate legal end.
Report thisBy jackpine savage, June 6, 2008 at 6:37 am #
Excellent post, Mr Easton. The establishment of an outright military empire does make some sense - from an historic perspective - for America. (That it makes some sense does not make it right.) While i’m appalled by our national behavior, i’m embarrassed by our shoddy execution…and i’ve not yet decided which is worse.
There is, however, historical precedent…just not American history. The unraveling of the Dutch empire is one, though the parallels are fairly difficult to discern. The choices made by Britain at the end of WWII and the situation that forced those choices resemble our situation closely. More oddly, we find ourselves in a situation similar to that of the USSR during the late 1980’s.
And with the most bitter irony, we’ve followed the rough time line of Rome…the nation state we were modeled after.
Report thisBy skulz fontaine, June 6, 2008 at 6:08 am #
The seminal perversion of the Bushites would the treason. Good old fashioned constitutionally defined treason. You know how when politicians and military officers take that Constitutional oath of office? Then they go about the business of lying to ‘we the people’ and starting illegal wars of naked aggression on a sovereign and innocent people and rendition then detain more innocents. Torture them and brutally murder them. Yeah, insurrection seems in order. Revolution would be the better term. When a Congress turns it’s back on ‘we the people’ and arrogantly refuses to hold our “chief executive and his minions” to account. When a Congress continues to fund an illegal war of terror. When a Congress turns the single greatest experiment in democracy into a fascist charade. Yeah, insurrection is better termed as a full blown revolution. The time is come. The United States Senate, the House of Representatives, the Supreme Court, the White House, and our entire federal system is racked with wanton abuse and treachery. Yeah, it’s passed high time for ‘we the people’ to get up off those well pampered and indulged posteriors and get about the business of reclaiming OUR America. From the Bushies and from the corporate/special interest perverts, the religious fascists, and those ugly John Yoo types that think torture is just another way to say to the world, “we’re number one!” It isn’t too late for America to stand up and be proud of who we are as a people. Nope, November can’t get here soon enough!
Report thisBy paul easton, June 6, 2008 at 5:54 am #
The objective situation we are facing will not be corrected by another swing of the pendulum. What is dawning on us is the end of capitalism as we know it. Capitalism requires economic growth, and we have finally come up against the limits of growth. From this point of view the imperial neofacism of the present administration might make some sense, if it was more capably executed, if only to buy some time.
At the same time, by some wierd kind of synchronicity, the ruling class seems to be losing its grip, and is letting itself be scammed by the very managers and politicians who are paid to look after its interests.
We are at the start of a prerevolutionary era. We really ought to think about what we would like to see happen next.
Paul Easton
Report thisBrooklyn, NY