![]() |
|
| |
|
Using Communion as a WeaponPosted on Jun 2, 2008By E.J. Dionne WASHINGTON—Word spread like wildfire in Catholic circles: Douglas Kmiec, a staunch Republican, firm foe of abortion and veteran of the Reagan Justice Department, had been denied communion. His sin? Kmiec, a Catholic who can cite papal pronouncements with the facility of a theological scholar, shocked old friends and adversaries alike earlier this year by endorsing Barack Obama for president. For at least one priest, Kmiec’s support for a pro-choice politician made him a willing participant in a grave moral evil. Kmiec was denied communion in April at a Mass for a group of Catholic business people he later addressed at dinner. The episode has not received wide attention outside the Catholic world, yet it is the opening shot in an argument that could have a large impact on this year’s presidential campaign: Is it legitimate for bishops and priests to deny communion to those supporting candidates who favor abortion rights? A version of this argument roiled the 2004 presidential campaign when some, though not most, Catholic bishops suggested that John Kerry and other pro-choice Catholic politicians should be denied communion because of their views on abortion. The Kmiec incident poses the question in an extreme form: He is not a public official but a voter expressing a preference. Moreover, Kmiec—a law professor at Pepperdine University and once dean of Catholic University’s law school—is a long-standing critic of the Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade decision. The former head of the Office of Legal Counsel in the late 1980s, Kmiec is supporting Obama despite the candidate’s position on abortion, not because of it, partly in the hope that Obama’s emphasis on personal responsibility in sexual matters might change the nature of the nation’s argument on life issues. Kmiec has drawn attention because he is one of the nation’s leading “Obamacons,” conservatives who find Obama’s call for a new approach to politics appealing. Kmiec started life as a Democrat. His father was a soldier in the late Mayor Richard J. Daley’s Chicago political machine and Kmiec’s earliest political energies were devoted to Robert F. Kennedy’s 1968 campaign. But like many Catholic Democrats, Kmiec said he was profoundly attracted to Ronald Reagan. For Kmiec, five words in Reagan’s 1980 acceptance speech summarized the essence of a Catholic view of politics: “Family, work, neighborhood, peace and freedom.” In an interview over the weekend, Kmiec argued that 35 years after Roe, opponents of abortion need to contemplate whether “a legal prohibition” of abortion “is the only way to promote a culture of life.” “To think you have done a generous thing for your neighbor or that you have built up a culture of life just because you voted for a candidate who says in his brochure that he wants to overturn Roe v. Wade is far too thin an understanding of the Catholic faith,” he said. Kmiec, a critic of the Bush administration’s Iraq policy, added that Catholics should heed “the broad social teaching of the church,” including its views on war. Kmiec shared with me the name of the priest who denied him communion and a letter of apology from the organizers of the event, but requested that I not name the priest to protect the cleric from public attack. The priest’s actions are almost certainly out of line with the policy of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops. In their statement “Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship” issued last November, the bishops said: “A Catholic cannot vote for a candidate who takes a position in favor of an intrinsic evil, such as abortion or racism, if the voter’s intent is to support that position.” The “if” phrase in that carefully negotiated sentence suggests that Catholics can support pro-choice candidates, provided the purpose of their vote is not to promote abortion. Already, Archbishop Joseph F. Naumann of Kansas City has played an indirect role in the 2008 campaign by calling on Kathleen Sebelius, the popular Democratic governor of Kansas who has been mentioned as a possible Obama running mate, to stop taking communion because of her “actions in support of legalized abortion.” But because Kmiec is a private citizen and has such a long history of embracing Catholic teaching on abortion, denying him communion for political reasons may spark an even greater outcry inside the church. Kmiec says he is grateful because the episode reminded him of the importance of the Eucharist in his spiritual life, and because he hopes it will alert others to the dangers of “using communion as a weapon.” Previous item: Campaign Soundtrack Next item: Joseph Stiglitz on Recession Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment
|
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved. |
By John Hanks, June 14, 2008 at 7:42 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
They are inherently interesting though. They all use protection racket cons starting usually with a fear of missing out on something (usually a heaven), supplemented by a fear of some terrible force (usually some form of hell). They are really another classic example of using force and fraud to control people, and keep them at about a 14 year old level. There is another con called the righteousness con, which provides its victims with a cheap sense of moral superiority for doing little or nothing. There is also an identity con as well - “join the club” (VERY POWERFUL STUFF - LIKE THE MARINE CORPS.)
Report thisBy Conservative Yankee, June 14, 2008 at 7:23 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Is any of this superstitious mid-evil nonsense really worthy of serious thought?
John Law of Boston told Father Robert Drinan that he would either have to give up his place in the church or his seat in the House of Representatives.
Pedophile priests obviously were not as harshly treated.
Report thisBy John Hanks, June 4, 2008 at 6:49 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
I call the God of Abraham, the skygod, to distinguish him from the god within that resides in the upper right lobe of the brain.
Report thisBy Ben, June 4, 2008 at 4:07 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
A well-meang defense, to be sure. But an empty one nontheless. I was brought up in the strict Southern Baptist tradition and later converted to the Catholic faith. I got all the guilt and brain-washing on the subject one could absorb. But I’m much better now!
At some point in time, we all need to make our own decisions as to what is believeable and what is not on a cold, hard and brutally honest examination of all we’ve been told and how that squares with everything we know from the related empirical experience. And *no one* can make that kind of honest examination and walk away believing in *anything remotely like* the Abrahamic god of the bible.
Report thisBy John Hanks, June 4, 2008 at 2:49 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
they would understand that all “isms” are just hiding places for rackets and crooks. Catholicism, Judaism, Atheism, Republicanism, Racism, Sexism, Feminism, Socialism, (socialisms ok) Communism, Nazism, Militarism, etc. All are instruments that cause blindness. They all are used to put out your eyes, so somebody can rob you later on.
Report thisBy Eric Arthur Blair, June 4, 2008 at 2:04 pm #
By Ben, June 3 at 2:09 pm: “Why sympathize with the victims of these ecclesiastic snubs! Are they not familiar with their churchs position when they join?”
I don’t know what the situations are with Protestant denominations, but most Catholics are born to their religion, baptized as infants and indoctrinated in the dogma before they have a choice in the matter. Those who convert by choice as adults are overwhelmingly outnumbered by those who had nothing to say about their entry and grow up being told that they’ll go to hell if they even think of leaving the church.
By the time they reach adulthood, decades of instilled guilt make withholding of the most frequently administered sacrament a rather effective form of spiritual blackmail.
As I understand it, only Jewish mothers are more effective guiltmongers than the Catholic clergy.
Report thisBy felicity, June 4, 2008 at 9:43 am #
NROBI - This is in reply to your June 4 post. In my parish, I also see a gradual return to pre-Vatican II days. At the same time I think it’s still a minority who are tyrannical about it - so far.
Religion - Catholic, Christian, Muslim, Jewish…doesn’t matter - becomes deadly when intolerance of anybody or anything that doesn’t agree with it becomes its primary business. (Intolerance is best defined by its antonyms - tolerant, liberal, open-minded.)
Unfortunately, religion is a convenient, almost natural, means by which the intolerant will act out their hatreds. As of now, it seems to have become an illness, not only in this country but world-wide.
Report thisBy John Hanks, June 4, 2008 at 8:52 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Everbody wheres a biologicial tin foil hat. Spirituality is located in the upper fight temporal lobe of the brain. (It probably has some survival value. Maybe sociopaths are defective). The point is that that is where the flashlight is located and everything it pulls out of the dark is just lawn furniture.
Report thisBy Laura Nason, June 4, 2008 at 8:37 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
We’ll need a few new laws on the books.
Report this1: Every female will have to report each time she engages in sexual activity on the assumption that she became pregnant at that time. When that pregnancy is confirmed, that fetus must be constantly monitored up to it’s actual birth. We must make sure the “mom” doesn’t do anything in her daily life that might jeopardize that life.
2: Family life insurance policies MUST include the unborn child. Since pregnancy cannot be confirmed in the first few weeks, each month when the “mom” has her monthly, it must be assumed she has miscarried and insurance must pay for the loss of that potential life.
3: Since GOD performs abortions every day, ie:miscarriage, we must denounce HIM as a murderer and abortionist and close all churches.
4: Pro-lifers who send men and women to war, especially illegal occupations, are morally responsible for the deaths they cause and cannot be called pro-life. Life is only important to these hypocritical people UNTIL it is born. After, it’s not worth talking about.
By nrobi, June 4, 2008 at 8:34 am #
Felicity, in the Catholic Church you and I are truly in the minority. I, see more and more of the people in my parish cave into the prevailing winds of regression and longing for an easier time. A time, when everyone knew that the priest had all the answers, the Bishop was seen only by some, and G-d, spoke from Heaven through the Holy Father. No longer, are the masses content with this style of faith, the demands of the world and our own growth, seek out through doubt whether we have all the answers and look to other faiths and ways of thinking, apart from the normative doctrines of the Church. As I noted, dissent will not be brooked in this “new, old,” Church. What are we left with then? I have to know that my faith, is not dependent upon a person or the dictates of someone I have never met. And who for the life of me, I will probably never meet. This against a backdrop of continuing corruption and scandal, helps me to know that I cannot choose one faith over another. When people ask me, what do you believe, I tell them this; I am a CaBuSuJew. My beliefs are drawn from the Catholic, Buddhist, Sufi and Jewish traditions. No longer will I lock myself into a single belief system that does not and cannot meet the demands of a growing spirituality. When will I see the results of my faith come to be? Only G-d can tell, and that will only happen when I rise to meet the maker of us all.
Report thisThe lethal and explosive combination of politics and religion was proscribed by Paul, in his letters, saying that no man who becomes in politics should be involved in religion, and no man who serves G-d, should become involved in the political arena. This abomination of politics and religion, should and will be driven from the landscape of American life, but only when enough people stand up and say with loud voice, “Enough Already!” we the American people know the ideal set forth in the Constitution and Bill of Rights, that religion and religious litmus tests should play no part in the political arena. We demand that you, X candidate become a person of moral and ethical standards, but to trumpet your church-going on the stage will not be tolerated. Should you continue to pander to a small, lackluster community, we will not vote for you neither will we give to your campaign, so that you can oppress us with your ideas. We are adults!
By m.tunney, June 4, 2008 at 8:25 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Funny that you can be a confessed murderer and receive Holy Communion but somebody, who chooses to join a political party, which is not totally ‘Kosher’ by catholic standards cannot. What if someone supports, let’s say the republican party, which has waged a criminal war, being without just cause on Iraq? Is every republican unable to receive communion?
Report thisWhichever priest, who on whoever’s instructions made this fatal decision is chasing a lot of catholics away from being respectful of the church leaders. I am a real catholic but the jokers, who are running the church in the U.S. are nothing other than a bunch of demagogues, who cater to old people, who have no other sport than interacting with their parish priests.
Come on grow up to the real world and stop playing control freaks, who are selling tickets to Heaven to those, who pay lip service to the church, but wouldn’t know how to get to Heaven no matter how many tickets they have sold or bought, because they have lost their spiritual compass.
By cyrena, June 3, 2008 at 9:29 pm #
Village Elder, thanks as usual for this excellent post. (I’m SOOO grateful for the articulate wisdom that I gain from you and others here).
I almost missed it, as I was about to ‘unsubscribe’ from this particular thread. (I find irrationality depressing).
So, I’m glad I took a brief last cruise though. The posts are inspirational for me when I get stuck in my own work/writing. They provide me with a much needed prompt.
Report thisBy samosamo, June 3, 2008 at 7:41 pm #
What a far far better world this would be if people owned up to and understood their personal spirituality.
Report thisBut organinzed religion’s appearance on the scene has taken this away from the masses as it found a perfect exploitative characteristic in which to gain and maintain control of the masses. Why are there so many different religions for 1 supposed god? I would say holding to religious fervor that that is the classic example of ‘graven images’.
But I guess that because of human’s inherent weakness in the face of the future and the unknown, we have to break up into groups to drive this into the ground, meaninglessness.
By old NJ guy, June 3, 2008 at 6:10 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Jesus likely would equally reject abortion and war.
I also believe Jesus would reject any religious minister that selectively used their station to sway an election in favor of pro-war. Jesus would say to these pro-war religious leaders, “Hypocrite!!”
Love, compassion and forgiveness is Jesus’ message.
Report thisBy skmacksk, June 3, 2008 at 3:21 pm #
Mr Kmiec is a representative of a political party that is unapologetic in its romance with the jackboot. He regularly dispenses Neo-Conservative political platitudes, and bromides. So why should we be surprised at his religious choice: that of another brand of authoritarian thought, itself mired in spiritual platitudes and bromides. Mr. Kmiec is an obedient believer, but not quite obedient enough. Which came first his religion or his politics? A question that is, perhaps, unanswerable.
Report thisMr. Nelson, the myth of the Eucharist was not fully realized until the middle ages, with the creation of the doctrine of transubstantiation, according to Charles Freemans The Closing of the Western Mind. Or is this a case, Mr. Nelson, of faith over reason, defended on this website, maladroitly, in the last few weeks? Or are the objective facts of History, of no interest, of no moment to the faithful?
By VillageElder, June 3, 2008 at 2:50 pm #
The beliefs and opinions you cite are not facts.
On your first point—read some history texts written above the 4th grade level.
Priests/bishops/pope ... human. So were and are the molested children and the tortured, maimed and murdered victims of the zealots.
Your description of “partial birth” abortion is another restating of fundamentalist lies told to the uninformed. I always marvel at how religious types and self professed holy folks will tell any lie to promote their cause and fund raising.
Your argument that god created all things is unsupported belief not fact. And are you referring the the abramic god of the holy bible or one of the antecedents to yahweh who are well documented in history. Perhaps you are referring to the “supreme being” from another tradition with equally invalid claims at being the creator. As far as supporting and protecting life - review the dark ages.
Life and viability of a complex organism surviving on its own are different issues. Would you defend the right of yeast to survive and demonstrate you belief by not eating bread or drinking beer, wine or distilled spirits. That yeasty is the same (actually more complex) as a newly fertilized egg.
Only true believers are not interested in facts. Belief trumps fact for the believer. Rationality, as we developed during the Age of Reason/Enlightenment, after the religious gave our species the last bout of the dark ages—in the west courtesy of the church, demands that facts be verifiable by all and beliefs recited as truth are statements of madness.
Report thisBy Eric Arthur Blair, June 3, 2008 at 2:38 pm #
A quote from a pope:
“The death sentence is a necessary and efficacious means for the church to attain its ends when obstinate heretics disturb the ecclesiastical order.”
This wasn’t some medieval pontification (pun intended) - this is a quote from Leo XIII, reigned 1878 - 1903. The Catholics aren’t alone in bullying their followers, but they have more practice than most. This is one of the reasons I’m a member of one of the fastest-growing denominations in the world: former Catholics.
Report thisBy cyrena, June 3, 2008 at 2:13 pm #
No deafening silence here Rick Nelson, and YOU are exactly the reason that so many Catholics who really have any measure of what faith is about, have long since bailed from this stupidity.
To suggest that the Roman Catholic Church has ‘prospered’ is myth number one, and if you think you can focus on terrorizing people with language such as baby killing, I’d like to know what language you’d use to describe the terror of pedophilia perpetrated against thousands of children over a period of at least 30 years while the priests and bishops (of which my late cousin was one) and cardinals, and popes (even John) turned a blind eye. I guess if you all just don’t ‘SEE’ the evil, that it doesn’t prevail, huh?
Oh no, I come from a long line of those steeped in the hypocrisies of the Catholic Church. Some are smart enough to recognize them for what they are, and continue to practice their faith based on what they know is the right thing. Like nrobi’s post below.
Other’s..like you, stay stuck in the hypocrisy and make excuses for the atrocities of the tyranny that such Theocratic Authoritarianism perpetrates.
And no, it’s not ONLY Catholics, so don’t flatter yourself by claiming that it’s a matter of “Catholic Bashing’. There are hypocrites like you in all of the organized religions.
I just happen to be more familiar with the Catholic Brand.
Report thisBy Ben, June 3, 2008 at 2:09 pm #
Why sympathize with the victims of these ecclesiastic snubs! Are they not familiar with their churchs position when they join? If they willingly choose dogmatic knowledge (an oxymoron if there ever was one) over empirical evidence, personal experience and common sense, then they deserve whatever injustice that their moral authority visits upon them. And if more people had to live within the dogmatic constraints, contradictions and outright absurdities of their chosen religion, theyd more readily see the folly in adopting a world view based entirely on the fanciful superstitions of primitive sheep herders.
Report thisBy VillageElder, June 3, 2008 at 1:57 pm #
“Pro-Lifers” are simply anti-abortionists wearing a stolen dress. For all the reasons cited here, the pro-lifers don’t deserve the title. The public should always be reminded that they are not pro-life only anti-abortion with a pack of lies.
Report thisBy Dr. Knowitall, PhD, PhD, June 3, 2008 at 1:52 pm #
My Brethern, try not to get too wiggethed out by this. The Church ought to be able to meteth out Jesus’ blood in any way it seeth fit.
Who areth we to criticizeth?
Verily.
And remember, Jesus love you, this you know, even if at the altar they told you, no blood for you.
Blood Nazis!!!!
Report thisBy Joseph Martinelli, June 3, 2008 at 1:41 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Excellent, but we must stop insulting “whores” by comparing them to corporate or religious slugs.
Report thisBy Rick Nelson, June 3, 2008 at 1:26 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
It’s comforting to know that the bigotry against the Catholic Church in this country is alive and full of the same mis-informed rhetoric we have suffered hearing since the founding of America. Let’s look at some facts:
Report this1. The Roman Catholic Church has prospered for 2,000 years and for a good reason…“no evil shall prevail agianst her”
2. Priests/bishops/the pope are human beings…as was St. Peter who denied Christ three times.
3. Mr. Obama voted to kill babies born alive after partial “birth” abortions.
4. God is pro-life…“He created all things and declared them good”. The RCC has defended life consistanly for 2,000 years.
5. Modern science has proved and Planned Parenthood/Naral agree human, life begins at conception.
Since neocons and New Agers are not particularly interested in facts, one would expect a deafening silence…
By troublesum, June 3, 2008 at 12:50 pm #
Neuro-scientist Jill Taylor:
Report thishttp://www.ted.com/talks/view/id/229
By troublesum, June 3, 2008 at 11:34 am #
Pinochet was a good Catholic and never missed Mass on Sunday. Same for Franco.
Report thisBy lawlessone, June 3, 2008 at 10:42 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Why is it that zealots of religions which have been persecuted in the past always seem to want nothing more than the opportunity to persecute others in the future? Didn’t they ever read any verse of the entire bible other than the one about “an eye for an eye?”
The incident reminds us once again the dangers of allowing any religion to have any say in politics.
Report thisBy John Hanks, June 3, 2008 at 10:16 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
There is no Skygod. The real thing lies in the human heart and the right temporal lobe of the brain. Organized religion is a racket meant to fool perpetual adolescents.
Report thisBy felicity, June 3, 2008 at 10:09 am #
You’re not alone - I’m one. (I don’t think there is a tyranny of the religious majority, however, I think we’re faced with the tyranny of the religious minority.)
It’s understood that the Founders were committed to freeing the government of religion, but what’s forgotten is that they were equally committed to liberating religion from government. The latter had pretty much been upheld until recently when a candidate for President was pressured, more like forced to leave his church, apparently as a qualification for the job he sought?
Now we have Mr. Kmeic being denied Communion UNLESS he changes his support to a anti-choice candidate? What is that but a religion interfering with a citizen’s right to vote for whomever he pleases.
I don’t know when this lethal mix of religion and government started, but it’s predictable that if such continues unabated another of our freedoms will be on its way to the dust bin of our history.
Report thisBy P. T., June 3, 2008 at 9:29 am #
Notice that nobody is ever denied communion for being a war monger or death penalty advocate.
Report thisBy skulz fontaine, June 3, 2008 at 7:57 am #
Douglas Kmiec? Legal scholar? Conservative legal scholar? Numerous appearances on the Newshour? That Douglas Kmiec? Holy ‘wafer thins’ early in the morning mass, who’d a thunk it possible. Well there you go, Inquisition on and heat up the “irons!” Wow, is the ‘Pope’ responsible for this outrage? Nothing like a little enforced faith to bring out the “contrition” in true believers. Say, I wonder if the Catholics have brought back the old plenary indulgence. See, that way one can commit any number of venal/mortal sins and then cough up a bucket load of cash to the local priest and then the local priest can forward that bucket load of cash to the Pope and ALL is forgiven. G. Bush might want to consider that ploy. Even if old Bushy-bush-bush is Methodist or whatever. Long live the ‘Dark Ages’ and welcome back for a redo. Say, do you think that the unnamed “priest” got himself a consult with Antonin Scalia? You know, Tony ‘the reaper’ Scalia of the Supremes and Opus Dei. Hmmm, I wonder.
Report thisBy cyrena, June 3, 2008 at 7:12 am #
Well said Purple Girl. This ‘pro-life’ misnomer has been among the worst of so much of the BS language.
As nrobi has also pointed out, these same ‘pro-life’ people don’t extend their alleged ideology to the death penalty, (of which the US remains the only industrialized/so-called civilized nation that continues to practice it) and they surely don’t care about what happens to anyone AFTER birth!!
I have frequently cited -right here- the infant mortality rates in places like the rural South, and in the demographics where there are a majority of African-Americans, as being even higher than many of the so-called 3rd world countries.
Meantime, the pro-lifers don’t care a whit about those who manage to survive infancy in their highly privatized society where everyone is supposed to get by on their own, without education, without jobs, without even the basics of health care or a decent roof over their heads, and without even a modicum of respect for their humanity.
Report thisBy nrobi, June 3, 2008 at 6:16 am #
To use such a sacred instrument as the Eucharist, for political means, is an abomination and tyranny of the worst kind. I, am a Catholic, but wish that these men who have the charge of the Church, would get their acts together. Not only that but the bloviaters, such as Bill O’Reilly and Sean Hannity, would be the people they say they are, intellectually honest. Not only does the “culture of life,” say that abortion is wrong, but that state sponsored murder is wrong. That’s Right! The American Conference of Catholic Bishops, has a long-standing policy against the death penalty in all its forms. This also includes euthanasia. Should they wish, these men of “fair and balanced” viewpoints, need to change their stances on the death penalty as well. My church, the one that has in its history Vatican II, has been hijacked by a religious and wrong-headed group of men. They spout one thing and do another. They preach forgiveness and then to deny a private citizen, the most essential part of their faith, the Eucharist, because of political ideology, has at its root, tyranny and oppression. We, the laity of the Roman Catholic Church will not stand for the essentials of our faith being used for political or ideological gain. There are more Catholics out there that think like myself, then will admit it for fear of being wronged such as this unfortunate person was. Mr. Kmiec, should stand his ground and look to the Lord for comfort not the institution of the Church. I, too am voting for Sen. Barack Obama, but I am voting for him in full conscience, knowing that he and I support a women’s right to choose and that all the rest of the nonsensical arguments, will not change the fact that it is not my place to impose my will on another human being with full conscience. It is a shame that this disagreement has now become such a political football, that a person who stands up for their conscience, can and will be refused the fellowship of their faith and the essentials of the faith.
Report thisBy Atheist Insurgency, June 3, 2008 at 5:25 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Using a ritual symbolc of displaying a person’s status to the rest of the congregation as a tool to enforce the electoral decisions of the congregation is cause for immediate revokation of religious tax-exempt status and federal funding under faith-based initiatives.
Report thisBy Purple Girl, June 3, 2008 at 4:51 am #
I am so Sick of this BS rhetoric. the so called ‘Pro Life’ movement has Proven it is nothing more than a ‘Pro Birth’ movement, after that you are F*cked!the don’t giv ea shit about health care ,education, poverty, or even the Atrocity of War - blood for Oil.
Report thisSo who is really behind this ‘pro Life ‘Facade? The Corps, who used Religion to infiltrate the Faith based and CON them during every election. Not in hopes of passing their misguided Religous zeal agenda, bu tto put in Corp Whores who will throw them bones, bu totherwise pass laws to increase THEIR profit margins.
They have done the same thing with the Liberal Causes- Case In Point Hillary’s campaign. By using the ‘Gender War Cry’ they came very close to putting This Corp Horse (kind analogy) on the Nov Ballot- those securing the Only 2 horses in the Race-THEIRS. Her Obliterate Iran was a Wink and a Nod Not just to the War Profiteers but to the Religious heretics who have Highjacked religion for Millenia (sociopathic meglomaniacs who have proven they have NO regard for the Words or Teachings in any Holy Book). She has single handedly Undermined what little gains we have acheived over the last 35 yrs- Do Not pat yourself on the Back for a meager $0.02 raise in 35 yrs, Nor allowing Roe v Wade to be damn near overturned every year!‘The Proof is in the Pudding’ by demanding Special considerations, treatment and priviledges she has cut the legs out from under OUR Quest for ‘Equality’.these S.O.B’s are camoflagued in Red & Blue and don’t give a Rats ass about Anyone else but their Own profit margins and Power status.
the Catholic Church proved it’s allegience to some other force long ago, and the Evangelicals have taken up the same ‘Warrior’ Status. what is not so obvious is those who lurk among US in the liberal/Progressive Realm. We have also been infiltrated and are being CONNED by Traitors hiding among Us
By cyrena, June 3, 2008 at 12:08 am #
Well, I admit it. Im ALMOST as shocked as the rest of the flock. But then, its been over 40 years since Ive been even a peripheral member of it. (The flock that is). And, this is the reason why!
But I know that Outraged is right in saying that in the REAL-est of senses, this is very old news, and so if Im at all shocked, its because I havent been paying attention. (though NOT fooled by any sacredness of it). And the only reason I havent been paying attention, is because I was shocked over 40 years ago, when this breathtaking hypocrisy first displayed itself to my young mind. I was having NONE of it. Nope. Nada. None!
At some point in our lives, -different points for different people- we come to the conclusion that religion represents the polar opposite of sanity, logic, and reason, at which point the choice becomes a no-brainer. What works best the sanity, the logic, and the reason? Or does the authoritarian terror, chaos, and insanity of religion work best?
Meantime, the Wahabbists of the al-Qaeda types aint got nothin on our priests here, eh? And the next time one of these bozos complains about Irans Theocracy, they should be burned at the stake.
Actually, that whole pedophile ring of priests should have been burned at the stake.
Outraged, good to hear from you.
And yeah, this isn’t confined to Catholics. I remember when the Democrats in a congregation down in Tx got kicked out of their Baptist church for being Democrats.
I choose sanity as my communion.
Report thisBy Outraged, June 2, 2008 at 10:50 pm #
E.J.
I fear only YOU are surprised/shocked at this “development”. Religion is a top down, “our way or the highway” organization. It’s not just Catholics, it’s ALL religions. If you know of one that isn’t, please…by all means “enlighten” me.
This is.. in a very REAL way, old news. It’s just that some of us haven’t been paying attention or were fooled by the “sacredness” of it all. Now, I don’t want to sound assinine because I myself have been a very sincere beliver. Then one day.. and I don’t recall it really, I thought, I’m consistently admonished NOT to investigate RELIGION..why? Well, the rest is history as they say…so… Hang Tough. INVESTIGATE.
Think big.
Report thisBy Fields, June 2, 2008 at 10:49 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
The Cathlolic Church gives itself the
Report thisright to deny Communion to a law professor for backing Senator Obama for President while at the same time spending decades concealing the sordid activities of its’ own pedophile priests!?! Someone needs to explain to these so-called Men of God that this the 21st Century, NOT the fourteenth! The United States is a secular Republic and they wield no power here! Perhaps it is time to take a second look at the tax-exempt status of the American Catholic Church!
By anambrose, June 2, 2008 at 10:44 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
I’ve watched Doug Kmiec on C-Span as well as cable outlets and PBS Newshour over the years and observing his positions and stances on law in general led me to conclude that he was far to the right like many of Reagan’s acolytes. I use that term very loosely as they would prop him up as the Teflon Shield the Press created while they pursued their unravelling of the FDR Social Contract so many Americans bled and died for. Nuns would tell their charges that the Beatles and Rock & Roll were Commie Plots and the so-called Decency League listed books and movies which if read and seen were grounds for excommunication. Last Temptation of Christ (the book) and Baby Doll (the movie) were just two examples of cultural fare that would get you burned at the stake by the Pope. At the same time Bishops and the Church were covering up one of the largest rings of pedophiles ever to exist: within their own ranks. So while I’m not surprised by insane and intolerant officials of Holy Mother Church Flogging the Faithful; I am surprised at the reaction of their loyal Flock. What part of the last 2000 years of Holy Inquisition, Torture, Murder, Greed, Lust, Hypocrisy, Oppression and Suppression have you missed? Thought You’d be the Exception? Oh! You don’t want Separation of Church and State? Well You’ve been undermining it for years. Don’t like abortion? Provide and fund comprehensive sex education then maybe abortions would not be the birth control of last resort. No Ifs No Ands and No Butts.
Report this