LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.  
November 8, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Steve Fraser on the Crisis of Capitalism

House Passes Health Care Bill

'Daily Show' Insta-Classic: What Lurks Within Glenn Beck?

Sen. George McGovern on the Presidency From Lincoln to Obama

Happy Birthday, Pat Tillman

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar
Head Cases

Head Cases

By Michael Paul Mason
$16.50

PornoPower

The Pornography of Power

By Robert Scheer
$11.89

more items

 
Reports

Trading Spaces, Iraq Edition

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on May 15, 2008
boy and soldier
AP photo / Anja Niedringhaus

By Anna Badkhen

BAGHDAD—American troops scour Baghdad’s southwestern neighborhood of Saidiyah for sectarian fighters and roadside bombs, fund reconstruction projects, hand out backpacks to schoolchildren and distribute grants to businesses that want to reopen now that sectarian violence in the area has abated.

But there is one important thing the Americans won’t do in Saidiyah, and this causes significant contention between the soldiers and the neighborhood’s community leaders: They will not evict hundreds of families that have illegally moved into houses abandoned when thousands of local residents fled to escape the block-by-block battles between Sunni and Shiite militias last year.

Evicting the squatters would allow the houses’ rightful owners to return from self-imposed exile to the once-upscale neighborhood of rich merchants and former Baath Party officials, say members of Saidiyah’s neighborhood council. Lawyers and doctors would reopen their practices, merchants would reopen their shops, and Saidiyah would prosper again.

But the Americans say that forcing out the squatters would cause a new cycle of displacement and homelessness, causing resentment and discontent among newly displaced families. They refer to an Iraqi government policy the Ministry of Displacement and Migration adopted this year, which prohibits local authorities from evicting displaced Iraqis, even if they are residing in homes unlawfully—and even if it means that the rightful owners must be turned away.

One thing both Americans and Saidiyah neighborhood officials agree on: Regardless of how it is solved, the issue of real estate ownership will cast a pall over the effort to bring reconciliation and prosperity to this part of Baghdad.

Advertisement

Chrome Bag - Free Shipping
The problem of squatters in Saidiyah highlights a crucial challenge the rest of Iraq faces as it begins the process of reconciliation and recovery from sectarian strife that peaked here last year, killing thousands of people. More than 4 million Iraqis fled or were forced out of their homes, according to the United Nations, and more than 2.5 million of those moved to different areas inside Iraq. Tens of thousands settled illegally in homes that do not belong to them.

“There really won’t be a happy solution to resettlement, at least not in the near future,” said U.S. Army 2nd Lt. Chris Allen, whose Apache Company of the 4-64th Combined Arms Battalion, 3rd Brigade Combat Team, 3rd Infantry Division, assists Saidiyah’s neighborhood officials with the resettlement of returning residents.

Up to 400 families have returned to Saidiyah since February, says Lt. Col. Johnnie Johnson, the 4-64th commander. Ali al-Ameri, chairman of the neighborhood council, says that approximately 310 families that had come to Saidiyah to escape the violence in their areas of Iraq left and went home during the same period.

But hundreds of people still occupy houses that belong to someone else, and many refuse to move—even when the owners return, Ameri said.

“Last week more than 20 families came to me and said that they couldn’t move back because someone else was living in their house,” said Ameri. He cast a glowering glance in the direction of an American officer, Capt. Andrew Betson, who has repeatedly denied Ameri’s requests to force out the squatters. ” ... I had to tell them that there was nothing I could do to help them.”

Faras al-Qabi, another council member, said: “We talk about this with coalition forces and they say don’t kick them out, they are displaced. But I met a guy who just came back.  He said he has lived in a house for 30 years. He had a deed to his house, birth certificates of his children that said they were born in that house. But someone else is living in it. Is that fair?”

“It is an issue of compassion,” Betson responded. “Everybody cares but no one wants to put families out in the streets. It’s hard. It’s frustrating. The answer is not going to come from the coalition forces.”

Betson said it is the Iraqi government’s job to resolve the issue, but the nation’s resettlement policy is vague on how to handle such disputes. It states, for example, that the displaced families “have the right to get back their residence or land or belongings that they were forced to leave, or to get compensation for the lands or homes or belongings that are hard to get back.”

If this means that people who find their houses occupied by squatters are entitled to a new house, that means the government would have to spend millions of dollars on compensation, which it cannot afford to do, Lt. Col. Johnson said. An average house in Saidiyah costs about $100,000.

Johnson said he had not heard of any family in the Rashid district of Baghdad, which includes Saidiyah, that had been compensated for losing a home to squatters.

“The only compensation I’ve heard of” was a one-time payment of about $900 to each of the families that returned to Saidiyah earlier this year,  Johnson said. He wouldn’t venture a guess as to how many people were squatting in Saidiyah, but Ameri said they number in the hundreds.

When Americans patrol the neighborhood, they can identify owners if they produce the deeds to their homes. But many people here tell Americans they are renting the houses, and in a land where most rental agreements are verbal, their claims are difficult to verify, the soldiers say.

Betson understands the complexity and importance of the property issue and dispatches his soldiers on daily patrols to try to find out how many people in Saidiyah’s litter-strewn streets own their houses. But when the soldiers identify squatters, they will do nothing to move them out, he says.

He expects the problem to worsen in the summer, when the school year ends. Hundreds of refugees whose children are attending school in Syria, Lebanon and Jordan may be planning to return to Saidiyah at that time.

“There is no easy solution,” Betson said. “It’s definitely not the fault of Iraqi government or the fault of American army. It’s really just hard.”


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By msgmi, May 18, 2008 at 12:07 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

It’s time for GW to get Paul Wolfowitz, Doug Feith, and their fellow-neoCONS to spearhead a Special Iraq Reconstruction Working Group in order to resolve the social tensions resulting from squatter-settlements. Paul & Doug should be given carte blanche authority to bring a facelift to the Bagdad street. They are experts at resettling communities in an orderly and lawful way. Paul and Doug’s bboosom buddy, Ahmad Chalabi, would be selected as the Bagdad Viceroy of Housing in order to deal with the returning displaced refugees. Paul & Doug are the last chance for an Iraq solution, not the surge.

Report this

By Don Stivers, May 16, 2008 at 5:47 pm #

How can people who decided to perform invade Iraq be left in office?  What a terrible thing that has been done to the Iraqi people.  No punishment, even for a mistaken invasion?

Report this

By nefertiti, May 16, 2008 at 10:05 am #

Apparently Wolfowitz said Iraqi oil will pay for the reconstruction and within 18months iraq will start becoming a shinning example of democracy in the Middle East . (heard an iraqi intellectual quote him )

Report this

By JimM, May 15, 2008 at 3:05 pm #

Hey it is only right that Chimp in Charge would take them in as he caused their displacement.

I am sure there are many good and dedicated soldiers.

There are also unfortunately the bullies and the brutes that upon their return become cops, prison guards, Blackwater employees or other ‘authority figures’ so they can continue their thuggish behavior. They help give all in the military a bad name.

Under Clinton, the military was actually beginning to do some good stuff on a humanitarian basis. I respected them for that.

Report this

By bozhidar bob balkas, May 15, 2008 at 2:42 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

not, of course, a success for injured and dead amer soldiers.
it is not only possible but probable that both the US and israel fear more a passive massive resistance in iraq and remnants of palestine than the military one.
i base my preferance for passive resistance in palestine on the fact that palestine is gone; possibly, forever.
i urge iraqis not resist militarily because US hasn’t lost a single war.
even in s.e. asia the ratio of kill was 57td dead amers to an est. 3-6mn asians dead. thank u.

Report this

By Peter, May 15, 2008 at 11:47 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

a new guy from work that served in Iraq told us that the US Government moved the border of Iraq so they could tell us that there was a reduction of troops serving.

People are dying for this kind of crap. The AWOL Coward playing Commander in Chief is as farcical as it gets.

Mr. Bush has destabilized the world economy and we still put up with it!

Recall Pelosi and end the Bush Regime!!!

Report this

By Purple Girl, May 15, 2008 at 11:26 am #

Ok what american would not be totally pissed off if this happened to US? Granted some of US would take these refugees in - but since it’s our house we can’t get in we are at the mercy of the Refugees to Let US back in?and Hell why would they do that your digs are probably better than anything they ever had - esp since their place has most likely been destroyed, they got nothing to lose.
Jesus we need to have IQ tests for those seeking ANY Public Service job- From President to metermaid (oh yeah the lower ranks get tested)
God (and all others) forgive US we are TRYING to get this Incompetency and Corruption out of our Gov’t & Incs- but they are like ticks with their heads burrowed into our flesh, it appears our matches are wet (from the blood shed they have caused).We have been blindfolded for decades and have more recently been Shackled and gagged as we became more aware and defiant. But We are Trying!

Report this

By Expat, May 15, 2008 at 10:51 am #

^ it’s like the kid is looking at an automaton; aka, robot.  Geared up an android; I mean look at this guy; is he a human?  Not sure!

Report this

By Expat, May 15, 2008 at 10:47 am #

^ show me title and it’s yours.  No title; get out now!  Stupid is as stupid does; most likely the U.S. policy.  U.S. get out now; ASAP.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
Click here to learn more about Truthdig
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.