|
|
May 21, 2013
|
|
A Lesson for RepublicansPosted on May 15, 2008WASHINGTON—Sen. Bob Corker, a Republican elected in the face of the 2006 Democratic sweep, understands the panic that took hold in his party this week following its loss in a ruby-red district. Corker is familiar with the feeling. His readiness to tell his story says much about the alienation of many Republicans from the national party’s stale approach to politics and the limits of negative advertising. It is also a warning to GOP strategists who think that personal attacks on Barack Obama will be sufficient to win the presidency. Facing a tough contest against Harold Ford Jr., a young, telegenic African-American congressman, Corker says he watched his campaign flounder as his consultants ran television ads that tried to paint his opponent, a moderately conservative Democrat, as a “liberal.” “They were grotesque,” Corker said of his own commercials in an interview this week. “It was just the same old stuff.” By contrast, he said, Ford’s spots were “fresh and refreshing.” Corker, the former mayor of Chattanooga, called in new consultants and switched to a more positive campaign. “We kept the race about Tennessee,” he said. “We focused on my life, on who I was as a person.” Independent voters who had been attracted to Ford started moving Corker’s way. Advertisement Corker was furious, and not just because his six-point lead melted into a four-point deficit. The party eventually pulled the radioactive ad and Corker won narrowly. The senator has advised Republican colleagues in tough races this year to resist national party ads that mention their opponents. Few Republicans will go that far. But Democrat Travis Childers’ victory Tuesday in a Mississippi district that had given 62 percent of its vote to President Bush in 2004 caused something of a nervous breakdown in GOP ranks, breeding a crisis of confidence among Republicans in the party’s consulting establishment and national leadership. It was the third Republican special election loss in a row, all in House districts the party had counted as its own. It was the second time in less than two weeks that a big-money advertising campaign aimed at linking a conservative Democrat to Obama had failed. In a remarkably open rebellion, Republican members of Congress and party strategists decried Bush’s role in bringing down the Republican “brand,” the party’s failure to offer new policies, and the futility of campaigns rooted in the 1980s and ‘90s. Rep. Tom Davis of Virginia, who is retiring, confessed to me that if his party “were dog food, they’d take us off the shelf and put us in a landfill.” Tony Fabrizio, a Republican pollster, said party leaders have “got their heads in the sand. They’ve kept on this track, they keep expecting miracles, and there are no miracles.” And Corker said voters did not believe the Republicans were “solving the major problems,” notably guaranteeing Americans health coverage. “We just haven’t been responsible,” Corker said. “We deserve to be where we are. I hope we right ourselves.” The one comfort, said Davis, lies in John McCain’s ability to run well ahead of his party. “McCain has his own brand. He’s not dragged down by the Republican brand.” Fabrizio sees McCain as successfully employing President Bill Clinton’s strategy of “triangulation” by “using George Bush and the Democrats to try to define himself by setting himself off against both of them.” A Washington Post/ABC News poll this week gave partial support to this view: While voters gave the Democrats a 21-point advantage over Republicans as the party better equipped to handle the nation’s problems, McCain trailed Obama by only seven points. Yet Obama’s still-significant lead suggests that McCain will have trouble escaping the anti-Republican uprising. Democrats are trying to limit his room to maneuver by linking the presumptive Republican nominee to Bush’s policies. Fabrizio argues that McCain’s urgent need to run as an independent means that “McCain could win in a landslide, and we still lose the House and Senate significantly.” In this spring of discontent, Republicans are turning on each other because even their best news is bad news. E.J. Dionne’s e-mail address is postchat(at)aol.com. © 2008, Washington Post Writers Group New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By BCC Meteorites, May 27, 2008 at 7:22 am Link to this comment
I never could understand what policies Reagan brought to bear in any economy or political landscape because none of it really made any sense within the frame work of society at large. In other words it was just a feel good patchwork of delusional smoke and mirros. Sort of like the pile of goods NASA is currently trying to sell the public on the MARS lander regarding permafrost beneath the surface. If ice cannot be detected by remote spectral sensing on the surface, then finding it beneath the surface is going to pose a real challenge. But the military machine has to have it’s billions.
http://www.bccmeteorites.com/misconduct-planetary.html
Report thisSRD
By Expat, May 18, 2008 at 5:00 am Link to this comment
Excellent post, you sum it all up nicely. I just wish the rest of “them” could connect the dots so well.
Report thisBy Willard, May 17, 2008 at 2:18 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
republicans have run on a number of reagan created myths. After 30 yrs of this BS many have finally figured out they didn’t (Hoover) they don’t (reagan) and wont (bush) work. After 30 yrs of manipulation about family values, small govt , patriotism and wedge issues were not better off as a nation.
In all this time we have seen the best of American ideals destroyed. Deregulation has not made our lives better, lower taxes have not made our lives better and the marketplace mantra has only made the top 5% of Americans richer. Their lies about smaller govt shows theyve no principles.
add to the mix the anti science, anti education and you’ve developed an incredible series of blunders that have limited our ability to compete in the real world.
I guess republicans really believe the crap they spew about creating their “own” reality. It seems now however, that the American people aren’t buying their brand of snake oil anymore.
McCain is regurgitated Bush with more acid. What does he really stand for? Is he against torture? Is he really for 100 yrs in Iraq? Has he defined success for that war? We do know that he is for. McCain wants a continuation of the Bush economy in tax breaks for the rich; he is for a marketplace approach to health ins. We have recently seen him pander to the NRA and the religious right. The mans not a pragmatist hes simply an unprincipled politician with an atrophied brain
Report thisBy Mr.Witness, May 17, 2008 at 7:10 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Oh, NOW Bob Corker is against negative campaigns, after winning the election and holding office for almost two years. Isn’t that convenient?
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, May 16, 2008 at 7:37 pm Link to this comment
Nope. You are both wrong. Arlo Guthrie made it famous. Steve Goodman wrote it.
I’m glad at least that Corker had both the good sense and political savvy to realize that the national Republican Party is SO destructive, slanderous and abusive that voters are finally turning off to it, seeing it as “Oh, just more dirty politics”.
I believe in the two party system—that debate, argument and non-physical conflict are healthy for Democracy—and that deal-making across the aisle is neither weak nor corrupt—it’s every legislator’s DUTY in order to actually get anything done.
Curiously, it’s John McCain’s strongest card—he can cut a deal with Democrats.
Report thisBy PatrickHenry, May 16, 2008 at 4:07 pm Link to this comment
He epitomizes the small, less intrusive conservative and constitutional republicans who by hook and by crook have been replaced by the big-military and big-government neo-republicans who infest our government now.
Report thisBy DennisD, May 16, 2008 at 2:28 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Republicans, democrats just a brand name, nothing more.
You can’t expect people that are the system to change it. There’s no logical reason for them to do it.
Given the Catch-22 nature of our political system - McCain is just crazy enough to win and don’t discount the Diebold factor if it’s close.
Report thisBy Paul_GA, May 16, 2008 at 7:33 am Link to this comment
...which depicted the GOPelephant about to commit suicide with a handgun, labelled “MCCAIN”.
I’m a disillusioned former conservative Repub, and boy! Would I love to see it happen!
Report thisBy Expat, May 16, 2008 at 7:18 am Link to this comment
^ remember which one. I thought Woody, but it’s Arlo; they’re both American heroes. Thanks CY.
Report thisBy Purple Girl, May 16, 2008 at 7:08 am Link to this comment
It is time both parties scrape the crap off their boots before they enter any of our nations “Houses”.the Republicans of Old- small Gov’t, fiscally Responsible (admirable tight wads/Bean counters) have be usurped for Decades- Reagan screwed them along with the rest of the nation!Of course I ma giving REagan far too much Credit- revision- The Cheney Shadow Go’vt which Propped him Up too (Poor man had alzheimers when he Took office,Nixon was clinically Paranoid,Ford was happy to leave it to someone else, HW a ‘yes man’,Billy too arrogant and self absorbed to care, and well W. is mentally challenged. Now Dick has a choice Mac - suffering from deteriorational damage resutling from repeated beatings and Hillary who is Fully indoctrinated in thesociopathtic stratedgy)Last Honest man to hold Office Carter- but they kneecapped him with the Iran Contra Back room Deal.
Report thisSo the Real Republicans have been sidelined for a very long time. But the Dem party has had it’s own Covert operative who adhere to the Cheney doctrine- The DLC.
So the real Goal fro this Election to to assure none of their minions get back into the WH. Unfortunatley so far it looks like Mac has Stolen (handed) the nomination. I’d love to see the Old School Republicans Revolt and vote Libertarian or Independent- taht would knock th ewind out of their Sales. If the DLC steals this nomination (like they did for Gore/Lieberman, and Kerry/Edwards) I’ll be voting for anything other then those two corrupt parties (26 yrs Dem and OUT)- Even looking closer at Paul -just in case!
Funny hwo the Media has analyized evey possible aspect to this nominating Process except to ask- ‘why has a DLC memeber not been able to seal the Deal when it comes to the General?Because the Base could smell them a mile away- and if we bothered to vote- we held our noses!They Neve rgot the full force of the Real Base.that is why hillary keeps trying to define who the base is and the oxymoron term ‘Reagan Democrat’ has been flying around. Taht is the most offensive thing a Real Old School Dem could hear- call them either ‘Dixie Craps’ or covert operatives Neo Cons in blue! But Do NOT Call them Democrats in any way, shape or form!
New Millenia it’s time we run these Criminals out of both our Parties and into prison for Treason, War crimes and Crimes against Humanity!Let’s put those oppressive shoes on the Others feet!
By JEP, May 16, 2008 at 6:08 am Link to this comment
McCain has his own brand. Hes not dragged down by the Republican brand.
Then why does he pander to the right, if he’s already got them in his pocket?
McCain seems bent on proving his wingnut creds of late. If he’s got them in his hip pocket, why wouldn’t he reach out more to the center, instead of pandering to the “bomb bomb bomb” cretins?
Somethings strange about McCain’s campaigning, he seems to know something we don’t, like THE OLD REPUBLICAN BASE IS G O N E! And if he doesn’t find a way to reconstitute it, he’s got no hope of winning anything, he’s destined to become the next Bob Dole.
Otherwise, he would just give a wink and a nod to that base, and pander to the center for crossover voters. And that, quite obviously is not happening, he’s still shoring up his own wingnut base, (not very fruitfully.) He’s obviously not reaching out to the center.
The sincere evangelicals are one example of a group he won’t be able to pander to like Bush did, Rove’s “f*&^%$g faith-based thing” put them on full hypocrisy alert, and McCain’s floating social-issue decimal point, particularly his pro-choice stance, and his aggressive war posturing has many of them backpedalling from their past Bush errors.
And that is just one constituency McCain won’t be able to fool, because Bushco did such a poor job of it last time around.
All the Democrats have to do is replay Rush Limbaugh’s spiteful anti-McCainisms from the early days of the primaries, back when Rove’s minions were scuttling McCain’s campaign from the inside, paying each other exhorbitant salaries until the campaign fund was tapped out, before “Johnny On Top of Things” figured it out and fired the lot of them.
Rush is the gift that keeps on giving to the Democrats, and his Anti-McCainisms will come back to bite him and the entire Republican party in their collective elephant-arse before this election is over.
Report thisBy Conservative Yankee, May 16, 2008 at 5:20 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Arlo Guthrie.
Report thisBy Expat, May 16, 2008 at 4:05 am Link to this comment
^ collective heads out of their collective asses the unthinkable will happen; we’ll have a third term of Bushisms/cretinisms (my new favorite adj.). The only thing that could save us would be a true majority in the two houses of congress. That wouldn’t however, give me back my faith in America or her citizens. “America where are ya, I’m your native son….........” Woody Guthrie.
Report thisBy kath cantarella, May 16, 2008 at 1:57 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
McCain is as moderate as George Bush was before he was elected in 2000.
Report thisWill someone please list McCain’s actual achievements that qualify him as a moderate? Don’t bother listing the meaningless poses that make him look magnificent and have had no material effect on the status quo.
Of course he can’t be worse than Bush, who never bothered to govern at all. And if he bombs Iran, with his qualifications he’ll probably do a much better job of it than Bush in Iraq. What’s a few thousand dead Persians, more or less?
I can’t believe this nut is only 7 points behind Obama.
By Thomas Billis, May 15, 2008 at 11:35 pm Link to this comment
EJ if the democrats do not clobber the republicans this year after all that has transpired they should start thinking about careers outside of politics.Possibly supplying the Republicans prostitutes at Eliot Spitzer prices.
Report thisEJ the surprise would have been if the republicans held onto to those seats.You guys have been wrong all along on reading the anger of the American electorate.I do not know who the pollsters are talking to but it is not anyone I know.To paraphrase an old joke"if McCain votes democratic in Nov he will make it unainomous.My concern is that democrats will be no better than the republicans and my country will lose.