LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.  
February 10, 2010
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

The Terror-Industrial Complex

America's Confused Approach to Afghanistan

Haiti, Forgive Us

So Much for Plan B

Palin Calls Global Warming Research 'Snake Oil Science'

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * Wall Street Wants a Refund
 * NEW! * Haiti, Forgive Us

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar
Havana Before Castro

Havana Before Castro

By Peter Moruzzi
$19.80

more items

 
Reports

The Ritual Flaying of Jimmy Carter

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Apr 24, 2008

By Joe Conason

Nobody with a functioning memory should be too quick to condemn Jimmy Carter for daring to speak with the leadership of Hamas, as nearly everyone along the American political spectrum suddenly has felt obliged to do. From Condoleezza Rice and John McCain to Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, along with every congressional backbencher in both parties, expressions of disapproval have rained down upon the former president, who is old enough and tough enough to pursue his own beliefs to their logical conclusion.

“The United States is not going to deal with Hamas,” said the secretary of state, “and we had certainly told President Carter that we did not think meeting with Hamas was going to help.” The justification for that policy was explained helpfully by Obama, whose willingness to meet with foreign adversaries does not extend to Hamas, at least not during the primary season. The Illinois senator “does not support negotiations with Hamas until they renounce terrorism, recognize Israel’s right to exist, and abide by past agreements,” according to a spokesman for his presidential campaign.

As for McCain, he reacted reflexively and demagogically, which should come as no surprise. He denounced any engagement with Hamas as a “grave and dangerous mistake” and scorched Carter for meeting with “a terrorist group that has also killed innocent Americans.” A moronic congresswoman from North Carolina—who will have to live a very long time before she achieves a tiny fraction of what Carter has—proposed to revoke his passport.

Certainly Carter understands the nature of Hamas, an Islamist group not so different in its orientation from the radical students whose takeover of the U.S. Embassy in Tehran ultimately ended his presidency. What he also understands these many years later is that those once shunned as terrorists and criminals, forever beyond redemption, may eventually be recognized as the only possible partners in negotiation. For that, of course, is the very transformation he has observed in the Palestine Liberation Organization during the past three decades.

When Carter hosted the historic Camp David meetings that established peace between Israel and Egypt, the Jewish state’s prime minister was the late Menachem Begin, a former terrorist who firmly declared that he would never talk with Yasser Arafat and the PLO. Even as the Palestinians quietly began to consider the notion of a two-state peace settlement, American and Israeli policymakers could hardly contemplate any engagement with Arafat, whose responsibility for atrocious attacks on civilians was as clear as his commitment to driving the Jews into the sea. Indeed, Israel’s leaders regularly proclaimed that they would never talk with Arafat under any circumstances because of the Jewish blood on his hands.

Advertisement

Then things changed, slowly but irrevocably. Today the PLO leadership, legatee of the unmourned Arafat, is not only welcomed but also financially supported by the United States, with its shaky authority on the West Bank bolstered by the Israel Defense Forces. The government of Israel and the Palestinian Authority remain far from the final agreement that would achieve a just peace, but each acknowledges the legitimacy of the other.

This short history lesson is not meant to minimize the obstacles to a real peace. Most prominent among those obstacles is Hamas, which will continue to undermine and embarrass Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas so long as it is excluded from any and all diplomacy. Despite the repugnant ideology and brutality of the Hamas leaders, there is no doubt that the Islamist organization enjoys substantial popular support, even among Palestinians who do not share its religious worldview.

So there can be no sustainable deal between Israel and the Palestinians that is not accepted by Hamas.

Yet our current policy not only rejects any direct discussion with the Islamist party, but condemns any effort to learn what might bring them into the diplomatic process—or induce them to accept a negotiated settlement between the Palestinian Authority and Israel. Instead, we would require them to effectively surrender every point before we will even talk to them. It is the same mindless policy once directed by the White House toward our adversaries in Iran and North Korea until its uselessness became too obvious to ignore.

With ongoing violence in Gaza, Carter’s critics have already pronounced his mission a failure. But he elicited an official pledge that Hamas would honor a semi-permanent truce under certain conditions and accept a Palestinian referendum to ratify a peace settlement. That hint of moderation, halting and reversible, suggests that he may yet be vindicated.

Joe Conason writes for the New York Observer.

© 2008, Creators Syndicate Inc.


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By frank67, April 29, 2008 at 5:39 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

The Israelis are the the new nazies.  The only thing missing are the ovens. 
They act just like our nation’s “manifest destiny.” 
“The only good Palestinian is a dead Palestinian.”

Report this

By Jaimono, April 28, 2008 at 11:27 pm #

“Despite the repugnant ideology and brutality of the Hamas leaders…” I wonder if Mr. Conason knows what a balanced view is. If Hamas’s ideology and praxis are repugnant, then what can we make of Israel’s and its master the US’ (or is it the other way around)? These two criminal nations have ignored international law and have bombed, invaded, assassinated, and destroyed innocent people’s lives. How do you call this Mr. Conason? If you say that Hamas practices terrorism then the US and Israel engage in state terrorism, which from a moral point of view is even more repugnant, especially because of theur calling themselves civilized and democratic. The American public may believe (some may not believe, but they are afraid of the radicals who shut them up) the lies coming out of the American media, but the rest of the world are fully aware of the moral degradation of everything related to American politics.

Report this

By anti_republocrat, April 28, 2008 at 9:20 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

I used to respect Daniel Schorr. He was banished from the corporate networks for going outside the “acceptable range of debate,” but lately he’s been a real disappointment. Senile? But then NPR in general has been a disappointment for years, to the point where I no longer contribute. Juan Williams was one of the worst commentators on the Rev Wright business. He was like a broken record, “Why didn’t Obama leave the church?” Never a thought to “Why hasn’t McCain denounced Hagee,” who has said many hateful things about Catholicism.

Report this

By username, April 28, 2008 at 1:03 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

I found today’s Cal Thomas’ column (April 24) particularly despicable. I think it is totally irresponsible of the News to print that rubbish without also publishing an alternate point of view. His disrespect for former President Carter, probably the greatest “peace” ambassador in America today, was unnerving. Cal Thomas’ interpretation of Jesus’ teachings in the Bible prove to me that (organized) Christianity can be every bit as hateful and destructive as any other religion. The Bibles, bombs and bullets crowd may be finally about to self-destruct in self-delusion.

Thomas infers that the Koran allows Muslims to “lie to infidels” but states no specific passage. He may have the Koran confused with the Jewish Holy Book. The Talmud states in Babha Kama: “It is permitted to deceive a Goi.”  (Hint: a Goi is a non-jew) Or Sepher Ikkarim III c 25: “It is permitted to take the body and life of a gentile.” Or Schulchan Aruch, Jore Dia. “A Jew is permitted to rape, cheat and perjure himself; but he must take care that he is not found out, so that Israel may not suffer.” These are just a few “choice” passages from the Jewish Holy Book. Just brimming with love and understanding, don’t you think?

It is past time to clear the air waves and printing presses of these hate mongering pundits who are just as culpable as anyone for the current mess in the ME. 

It is time to give peace a chance…and Cal Thomas a pink slip.

Report this

By Tom Joad, April 28, 2008 at 4:14 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Just Google “Libya” and “victims” and “oil companies” and look for recent articles to see just how “written in stone” our “pollicy” of not dealing with terror states or organizations is.

Turns out, when they have oil we CAN deal with them, even help them out, be thier buddies. Even when they have taken american lives.

Enough of this farce. As Donny Rumsfeld might have said if he was consistent “you deal with the parties you have, not necessarily the ones you would like to have”.

Report this

By bozhidar bob balkas, April 27, 2008 at 3:14 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

non credo
very well put. the question may be, what does abbas know that we don’t? i mean, in order to cadge? hadn’t all pals’ ‘negotiators’ done just that? and knew and know it now? or is the money? knowing that peace is not available anyway? so why not obtain some money?
generally speaking, in a conqueror-conqueree relationship no negotiation can take place; the loser accepts a diktat.
then rages vowsto get even, prays etc.
locus classicus for such behavior being in ‘19 at marsseille when germans accepted allies’ diktat.
it being principal cause for rise of nazism and WW2.
crimes commited by US/IOF may produce yet another paroxism and cause WW3 with possible all or much of the world destroyed. thank u

Report this

By thebeerdoctor, April 27, 2008 at 11:43 am #

When Barack Obama was first asked about Carter’s Middle East mission, the junior senator from Illinois said: “Can I just finish my waffle?” Later, when he had to follow the AIPAC script, he quickly denounced Carter for meeting with Hamas. I guess the point of this character flaw is to say as President, Obama would talk to enemies, just not That enemy. Jesus! how low do you have to stoop in order to become president?
Three cheers for waffles everywhere!

Report this

By omop, April 26, 2008 at 7:19 pm #

The following is based on comments recently made by an Israeli historian who is not known for mincing real-politik.

“If there is no two-state solution here, there will be continuous warfare until one of the ethnic groups between the river [Jordan] and the sea wins,” Israeli historian Benny Morris said. “If the Arabs win, they will probably push the Jews into the sea, or gradually push them out. They’ll probably go off to America, if they’re not killed first. If the Jews win, my assumption would be that at the end of the day many of the Arabs would be completely driven out of Gaza and the West Bank.

Pres. Carter’s mission for which he was called a traitor by Danile Schorr on NPR and a bigot by the Israeli envoy to the UN may have been prompted by the scenario historian Morris foreseess.

Report this

By thebeerdoctor, April 26, 2008 at 6:39 pm #

Just what do you think would happen to Senator Obama if he suddenly said that AIPAC threatens the security of the United States? That same media that has attacked Rev. Wright, would be calling the junior senator from Illinois the devil himself. All of the main stream candidates are intimidated by the pro-Israeli lobby, whether you choose to recognize it or not.

Report this

By thebeerdoctor, April 26, 2008 at 6:31 pm #

Thank you for pointing out the truth. Robert Fisk detailed this in his writings.

Report this

By Mossada, April 26, 2008 at 5:47 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

America kisses Israel’s ass….FIVE times a day.

God forbid American should only manage only FOUR times a day: then would be called Bigots and Anti-Semites

Report this

By M Henri Day, April 26, 2008 at 4:16 pm #

The ritual flaying of James Earl Carter for daring to speak with Hamas (which at its inception was financed by Israel as a counterweight to Fatah) should come as no surprise under the present situation in which those who run things in the United States are determined to go to war with Iran, whether under Bush/Cheney or Ms Clinton. Mundus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur....

Henri

Report this

By bozhidar bob balkas, April 26, 2008 at 11:08 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

carter equates the crimes of the sides in conflict. yet, whatever aspect of this relationship we study, we’l find it to be vastly asymetrical.
1)israel holds abt 7-10000 captives; dysphemistically also calling them “prisoners”; aka, criminals.
2)carter is for occupation; but in a cunning way.
he demands it be a peaceful one. but which occupier obtains a peaceful occupation? granted he may not be aware that he’s doing this
3)pals hold one israeli soldier. he has a lawyer. pals do not have lawyers, as far as i know.
he does not recognize that an occpied people are morally and legally obligated to militarily resist the occupier.
hes’ for two-state solution; thus rewards israelis warfare and terrorism of ‘47-48 period.
he is against the right of return as was every prez. i’m for one sate solution.
thank u. 
then there is demolition of homes, orchards; theft of land.
and being self prez, he’s done nothing for pals having approbated all jewish crimes against the indigenes. thank u.
he also misses the fact that neithewr israel nor US recognizes any israel unlike moast countries who recognize israel of ‘48.

Report this

By dsmith, April 26, 2008 at 8:46 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Succinctly put!

Report this

By thebeerdoctor, April 26, 2008 at 8:10 am #

I have friend from the Middle East who told me that Hamas was elected by the Palestinians because Fatah was so corrupt.

Report this

By Iskandar Rabeendran, April 26, 2008 at 6:51 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

it’s good to see that some media still dare to speak out: the Israel lobby disproportionately influences the US congress.

Report this

By mike, April 26, 2008 at 12:28 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

...it was Fatah, the “officially recognized government”, that was the terror group, bent on the destruction of Israel.

Report this

By Inherit The Wind, April 25, 2008 at 7:57 pm #

Yeah, anyone who doesn’t say “Turn Israel over to the Palestinians” is a Zionist in your book.

I notice you didn’t have anything nice to say about Mr. Carter.  Could it be even your ultra-left friends will castigate you publicly if you rip Carter up for daring to seek peace between Hamas and Israel?

Report this

By tdbach, April 25, 2008 at 6:54 pm #

I don’t know why everyone is so surprised by Obama’s response. Folks, he’s not a secular savior; he’s a politician. Just like Hillary, he’s calculating what he should say. Everything, from what he thinks will win the Jewish vote to how he can counter criticism that he’s naive, goes into his abacus. He thought this was his best bet.

People around here give far too much credit to AIPAC for our troubles in the region. You’d think they were flooding our politicians wallets with money and breaking their thumbs when they forget who’s lining their pockets. AIPAC has achieved disproportionate success because they’ve been smarter than most lobbyists – and because there really isn’t a competing lobby anyway. They’ve been brilliant at using relationships within government and the media to get face time, and when they do get it, they’ve been very persuasive at making their case that Israel is not only a kindred “democracy” worthy of support, but that it is an indispensable ally in shaping the Middle East into a stable, pro-American region. Which is a pretty tough sell, you have to admit! It sure seems like everything is going to Hell in a hand basket BECAUSE of Israel. But they’ve managed to convince most everyone (and who knows, maybe they’re right) that as bad as it is now, it will be infinitely worse for America if Israel is chased into the sea, as Arabs will coalesce around Arab Nationalist causes and use their great, black, underground pool of resources to blackmail us into submission. And, they argue, no one here understands how to protect Israel like Israelis – particularly Likud party Israelis. They’ve also managed to convince politicians that ignoring their advice will lose the Jewish vote, even though a majority of American Jews don’t buy the Likud line and are much more inclined to accommodate a Palestinian state and give up occupied territories. Like I said, they’re very, vey good at what they do. But they’re no Dr. No operation, like some people seem to think.

Report this

By thebeerdoctor, April 25, 2008 at 4:47 pm #

Barack Obama’s criticism of Carter’s attempt to open a dialog with HAMAS, only reveals how the junior Senator totally caves into AIPAC’s agenda. Thinking people of conscience will have to decide whether to vote for the lesser of three evils.

Report this

By omop, April 25, 2008 at 1:22 pm #

Goes to prove what Ariel Sharon ostensibly told Shimon Peretz, when Peretz worried that israel’s actions might hurt US/Israeli relations. Ariel who is still in a coma was reported to have respondeed ” dont worry about America we control them in the government and in the press”.

Its not just sad to hear Schorr and others like him. Its just plain disgusting. But then with dual citizenships one has to wonder whether Schorr and others like him are truly Americans.

Report this

By WriterOnTheStorm, April 25, 2008 at 1:12 pm #

On Thursday, NPR’s All Things Considered featured a commentary by Daniel Schorr suggesting that Carter be indicted under the Logan act, a law forbidding private citizens from “negotiating” with foreign powers. Apart from containing important factual errors. the commentary failed to distinguish between talking as a private citizen and pretending to represent or speak for a nation, which Carter has not done. Schorr implied that although Carter has good intentions, he is perilously close to being a traitor. It was a shameless piece of propaganda

It is truly sad to see even the ‘alternative’ media singing the same old song.

Report this

By Jane, April 25, 2008 at 11:54 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Jimmy has always been my hero. And once again, I have been stunned by his courage in talking to the the leadership of Hamas while facing down severe criticism from many sides. It is absolutely the right thing to do. What has Israel got to lose? What has the world got to lost? Whose hands are so clean that they can stand in judgement against even talking to bring about possible change for the better. If there is no talk, there will be no change and furthermore, conditions will get worse. Therefore it stands to reason that Carter’s critics only want the violence to continue. Do they think they will obiterate Hanas off the face of the earth? Well, it hasn’t happened yet. And even trying to do so will fan the flames of hatred and resentment even higher and hotter. Jimmy Carter is able to see another possible way for two enemies to live together in peace. I think a lot of hearts and minds would have to change and that may prove too difficult to achieve. But Carter has seen, as has the world if we were paying attention, that bitter enemies have been able to find peaceful resolutions to centuries old conflicts. The Prince of Peace came to deliver just such a message. Jimmy Carter heard that message, and he has acted upon it with the courage of his convictions. May we never face a world without a Jimmy Carter to carry the flag of reason and hope into battle for the good of mankind.

I have been moved by all the thoughtful comments I’ve read here. Sometimes I think I’m the only one. This gives me another reason to hope for the continuation of the human race.

Report this

By Susan J. Hass, April 25, 2008 at 10:30 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Too bad the mainstream media killed the candidacy of Dennis Kucinich. He was our greatest hope to end the madness in the middle east and bring government reform to our own country. Yet he was excluded from all but the very first debates, derided for being a “rebel,” and misrepresented on every front. We need him, or someone like him, to stand up to the idiots in charge right now.

Report this

By Conservative Yankee, April 25, 2008 at 9:07 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Before we rush to sanctify Jimmy Carter, and revise history, please remember that as President Carter supported General Suharto, in 1978, Carter increased the flow of US arms to Indonesia, while Suharto, was committing genocide in East Timor.

Jimmy Carter assisted the Khmer Rouge in keeping its seat at the United Nations, even as they slaughtered a million of their own people. Carter refused to acknowledge the new (Vietnamese based) government in Phnom Penh and also turned a blind eye to the genocide.

Carter’s love of right wing dictatorships extended to the Philippians, South Korea, and Iran. He once called Marshal Tito one of his “best friends,”

Jimmy Carter has been a good ex-president, but he still has not lost that self-sense that he enjoys moral superiority over the rest of us… I reject that premise.

Report this

By omop, April 25, 2008 at 9:03 am #

While Carter is castigated and accused of being antisemititc there are one or two realities that must be faced.

1] The Palestenians aint gonna go anywhere. They have been there for ages; they are there now and will be there in the future.

2] The establishement of the state of Israel was made possible by two terrorist gans [the Stern Gand ang the Irgun Zvai Lumi] that drove out 700,000 Palestenians into refugee camps mostly in Lebanon. Those folks cannot remain and will not remain forever dispossesed from their lands and homes.

3] Either the powers that be; the US and her only preferred democratic ally in the region accomodate the injustices done to the Palestenans in a civilized manner or in time the only solution would be for the Palestenians to continue to become adept at modern killing techniques like their tormentors and give back in response what they have been getting for years.

insulting and fantasizing about what supposedly the Creator orally promised real estate to a priviliged few can only prolong and increase hatred and misery between essentially two semitic people.

Carter’s efforts may to a large extent be considered as doing Israel more of a favor than to the Palestenians whether they are called Hamas, Fatah, PLO or just plain human beings who have been caught in a dilemma not of their own chossing.

Its time to do the right thing[s]

Report this

By Paul_GA, April 25, 2008 at 8:45 am #

...either vote Libertarian, or write in Ron Paul. You don’t have to hold your nose and choose the lesser of three evils, friend. I have steadfastly refused to do that since 2000; starting with that election cycle, I’ve voted Libertarian.

As for the two big parties, Tweedledumb and Tweedledumber, I say, “A plague on both their houses!”

Report this

By Girish Shah, April 24, 2008 at 11:25 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

President Carter is one of the greatest leaders alive. I am so glad that he could care less what the neo-cons or AIPAC think about his activities. May God give him strength to make a positive change in this crazy world!

Report this

By SpinCycle, April 24, 2008 at 9:48 pm #

Of course the administration is going to flay Jimmy Carter.  The entire diplomatic policy of the Carter Center is a repudiation of the neocon policy of giving anybody we disagree with the silent treatment (which reminds me of the attitude of a petulant spoiled child).  Of course having Carter in the news at all reminds everybody of the Camp David Accords, the longest lasting success of any American President in the mideast ever.  It reminds everybody of how little Bush has accomplished in twice as long a time, so of course they are going to dismiss it.  It also undermines the goal of Rice’s mideast push, which is becuase there is no way a lame duck administration can get something accomplished by the end of this year to instead give the illusion of forward progress, so future spinners could say wow we would have peace in the mideast if only Bush’s time hadn’t run out.  (it the same goal behind ‘the surge is working’)  But Carter reminds them that real progress was attainable all along simply by applying real diplomatic leadership.

Report this

By Fadel Abdallah, April 24, 2008 at 9:08 pm #

I knew well in advance that Hillary Clinton and John McCain will be shamelessly pandering to the Zionists. I even think they might be card-carrying members of Christian Zionists.

But my great shock and disappointment is with Obama, in whom I saw earlier a hope to be free from the Zionist control. Now I find to my greatest disappointment that he is not really different; a sad reminder that the more things change, the more they stay the same if not get worse. Tiny Israel controlling the politics of this sad great USA is beyond the simple logic normal people use to measure things and put them into perspective.

Now I know I am a vote less citizen since I refuse to vote for the least of three evils!

Report this

By sophrosyne, April 24, 2008 at 8:25 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

It the same old stuff.  Israel rules our media and foreign policy.  None dare stand up to them.

Report this

By jackpine savage, April 24, 2008 at 6:55 pm #

It’s called statesmanship.  Don’t bet on seeing it from any of the three candidates currently offered.

If the next president wanted to spruce up our image in the world a little bit, he/she wouldn’t send Bill and George on the road.  He’d send Jimmy.

Carter bungled his presidency, but his downfall was that he tried to be honest with the American people.  As another poster pointed out, had we listened to him way back when, we wouldn’t be in the mess we’re in today.

Given that, i doubt that we’ll listen to him now.

By the way, wasn’t the Bush administration talking to the Taliban before 9/11/01?

Report this

By troublesum, April 24, 2008 at 5:49 pm #

The British said they would never negotiate with the IRA because it was a terrorist organization and for many years they refused to until they finally realized it was the only way to peace in Northern Ireland.  It takes people like George Mitchell and Jimmy Carter to get these things moving.  They are way ahead of other so-called statesmen in knowing the simple truth that in conflict resolution you are going to be negotiating with your enemies not your friends.

Report this

By samosamo, April 24, 2008 at 1:49 pm #

Yet, down the road they will be praising w and his administration for all the accomplishments they achived and especially how ‘unwavering’ w was in his ability to keep our economy strong and keep the rest of the world in line with the elites needs and wishes while everyone is standing in a soup line.
I wouldn’t be surprised if there was as big a push to carve w & dick’s faces on Mt. Rushmore.

Report this

By jatihoon, April 24, 2008 at 11:14 am #

There is only two kind of world we live. “A world of haves, and have-nots,A world of violence, and non-violence,Jimmy Carter chooses the method of,“Constructive Engagement”,engaging both sides,hoping to find a middle path, called, “ENLIGHTENMENT.”

Report this

By Conservative Yankee, April 24, 2008 at 9:59 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Jimmy Carter may be the best ex-president we ever had.

Report this

By weather, April 24, 2008 at 9:51 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

all we needed to know about Israel we could have learned from Rabin’s widow.

Until American Jews of any respect and standing come and confront the arrogance and the remarkably selfish deceit that infects Israel’s agenda - they will find no Peace, here, there or anywhere. Only Jews can fix this and that requires confronting their truths and healing themsleves first, w/out manipulating any blame onto others.

Again, while this is their reality, its a deplorable selfish distraction for us.

Humility eludes us, denial becomes us and trouble follow us. Not one of adult children running for office has an even remote idea of confronting our truth.
A nation that lies to itself, kills itself.

Look very closely at Jimmy Carter because deep in his DNA you’ll see a selfess example of humility.

Report this

By Jim Yell, April 24, 2008 at 9:18 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

The Religous Right loves to carry on about needing a religious President, but we had one in Jimmy Carter and as Carter’s Christianity had actually something to do with what Jesus Christ taught, they hate him for it. It doesn’t help that his personal Morals are much better than most Ministers.

While there were aspects of Carter’s Presidency I did not like, on the whole, He was responsive to reality when confronted by the volitale and political realities of buying energy from foriegn sources. If we had followed the mandates laid down in response to our energy vulnerability for all these intervening years, we could tell the Arabs to go F themselves, but of course Ronnie couldn’t be elected without overturning these practical plans for better use of energy and alternate sources.

Now the most lying administration and clearly criminal administration the country has ever had wants to keep any War Issue, as a War Issue, even though pre-emptive War has proven not worth the cost.

Well I hope President Carter keeps talking to everyone. It is sadly unlikely to help, but it won’t be his fault. One thing I will allow Bill Clinton is he tried mightly to cure the situation in Palistine/Isreal and the Moslems turned their back on the best offer they are ever likely to get.

Report this

By ender, April 24, 2008 at 9:00 am #

Carter brokered the only lasting peace accord in the region.
The rest of the US politicians are too busy kissing AIPAC butt to even make a serious attempt, and don’t have Pres. Carter’s credibility.

The neocons really just want a military solution with all Palestinians blown up or gone and afraid to return.

Carter wants what we should all want.

Peace in the middle east.

Report this

By Aegrus, April 24, 2008 at 8:41 am #

Jimmy Carter kicks ass. We will have peace!

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2010 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.