![]() |
|
||
|
Whose Elitism Is Worse?Posted on Apr 17, 2008By Joe Conason It is hard to blame John McCain for mocking Barack Obama as an “elitist” following that silly remark about bitter folks who cling to guns and religion. Rarely does the Arizona senator—one of the wealthiest members of Washington’s most exclusive club—encounter such a tempting chance to masquerade as a populist. Making the most of that opportunity, elder statesman McCain delivered a brief history lecture to the young upstart from Illinois. “During the Great Depression,” he said in a statement released by his campaign, “with many millions of Americans out of work and the country suffering the worst economic crisis in our history, there rose from small towns, rural communities, inner cities, a generation of Americans who fought to save the world from despotism and mass murder, and came home to build the wealthiest, strongest and most generous nation on earth. “They suffered the worst during the Depression, but it did not shake their faith in, and fidelity to, America. They did not turn to their religious faith and cultural traditions out of resentment and a feeling of powerlessness to affect the course of government or pursue prosperity. On the contrary, their faith had given generations of their families purpose and meaning, as it does today.” Now this is all standard-issue rhetoric, designed to insinuate that Obama disdains traditional American culture and religious piety (although he probably attends church at least as often as McCain). Harking back to the era of the Depression and World War II, the Republican may have unintentionally emphasized both his own advanced age and the perilous condition in which his party and president have left the country and the world. The inspiring story of the “greatest generation,” in which he seems to be claiming honorary membership, is not only a narrative of faith and patriotism. The brave men and women who rose from America’s towns and cities to defeat fascism had a stake in a democratic society “worth the fighting for,” to borrow the title of McCain’s last best-seller. Despite the terrible rigors of the Depression, they remained confident in democracy’s future because a progressive government acted vigorously on behalf of them and their families—and acknowledged their service when they returned from war. Advertisement Of course, McCain knows all this history, too, which raises the tough question of why he refuses to support Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans with commensurate benefits. Having built his own career on his service and suffering in Vietnam, he surely must be aware that the new generation of vets receives nothing like the assistance made available to those who served with him—because the landmark bill has not been updated for so many years. The current level of benefits doesn’t cover even half the cost of state college tuition for most soldiers. That is why Sens. James Webb of Virginia and Chuck Hagel of Nebraska wrote the Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act, whose cost is estimated at less than $4 billion, or approximately one-tenth of 1 percent in the total expense of the current war. They have gathered 53 co-sponsors, including nine Republicans and three of the four other Vietnam veterans in the Senate, but they need 60 to defeat a likely filibuster by conservatives who’ve never served. Incredibly, McCain has so far refused to add his name to the sponsors. His startling excuse is he has not had any time to read the bill during the past year or so. He has time to barbecue sausages for journalists. He has time to take a bus tour glorifying his own service. And he has time to hold fundraisers in Atlanta, New Orleans, Phoenix, St. Louis, New York, Boston, Chicago, Las Vegas and even London. But he has no time for today’s soldiers. If that isn’t the worst kind of elitism, what is? Joe Conason writes for the New York Observer. © 2008, Creators Syndicate Inc. Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment
|
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved. |
By Kendall, April 21, 2008 at 3:59 am #
Isn’t it the height of irony for the 2 richest senators in congress, McCain + Clinton, to jump on the elite-bashing-bandwagon.
Does not bode well for their presidental character.
Report thisBy Thomas Billis, April 19, 2008 at 8:25 pm #
I would like to know what qualifies someone as being considered elite.Was FDR who was often called a “traitor to his class”.If trying to understand why some in middle America vote against their own best interests is considered elitist add my name to the list.His theory may or may not be correct but as adults would it not be a good place to start the discussion.I have now heard that Hillary started out life as a “gun toting mama” and likies beer back after downing a shot.If that is not pandering what is.Starting a dialogue is elitism.Pandering to the lowest common denominator is called what"politics as usual”.
Report thisBy oldprof, April 19, 2008 at 5:01 pm #
Hillary Clinton played what I call the Tom Robinson race card when she called Barack Obama elitist for saying that working class people were bitter because of economic hardships. You will recall the trial in “To Kill A Mockingbird” in which Atticus Finch declares that Tom Robinson’s only crime was that, as a black man, he dared to feel sorry for a white woman. Clinton is essentially sending a coded message that Obama is elitist (translated as “uppity black man”) for daring to feel sorry for white working class people. She knows that people’s prejudices are easily manipulated in times of financial distress. It’s a shame that Clinton feels it necessary to resort to Jim Crow tactics in order to win an election. While Obama has been trying to appeal to the best in us, Clinton has chosen the path of appealing to the worst in us.
Report thisBy republicanSScareme, April 19, 2008 at 3:48 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
All these rich people calling each other “elitist” is pretty comical.
At least they cleared up somethings that worried me: They both can bowl, Hillary can drink, Obama doesn’t always go to church, Hillary’s not afraid of sniper fire, and flag pins can be both good and bad.
Thank you.
Report thisBy Windsor, April 18, 2008 at 1:44 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Those who lived through the Great Depression and the 2d World War remembered those who did not and built the greatest society the world has ever known, which the Republicans have been doing all they can to tear down over the past 30 years.
Report thisBy billybookworm, April 18, 2008 at 11:49 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
It appears that the mainstream press is actively working to discourage discussing the elephants milling around in our national living room. Obama’s comment is true, sometimes people do bury their heads in the sand and reach for some sustenance however irrational, guns, religion, drugs or booze. Obama’s words are true just as Rev. Wright’s sermons are for someone who can see the forest for the trees.
Report thisBy altara, April 18, 2008 at 10:06 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
related fake news:
POPE MEETS WITH BISHOPS
After celebrating his first public Mass in America at Washington Nationals stadium, Pope Benedict XVI met with a group of the leading American Bishops. The main news emanating from this meeting was the Pope’s message that at this time there is an unprecedented opportunity for increase in church attendance.
Pope Benedict noted that all across America people in small towns were frustrated with the failure of the U.S. government to respond to their needs and were turning to their traditions and to their churches. Some of these citizens were even bitter. In times like these, there is a return to faith and it is important that the Roman Catholic Churches be welcoming and help those who wish to cling to their religion.
While His Holiness expressed regret at the circumstances that had made these people bitter, he was pleased that religion could provide refuge and comfort.
homer http://www.altara.blogspot.com
Report thisBy Conservative Yankee, April 18, 2008 at 8:35 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Roosevelt died April 12, 1945 My mother still cries on this date.
The “Democrats” who loved Roosevelt included Nelson Rockefeller, Ronald Reagan, and The world War II movie star and hero Jimmy Stewart. Whoi all became Republicans AFTER his death.
I never understood why bankers hated him, as he saved their bacon!
He felt strongly that The Crimean Conference, “ought to spell the end of a system of unilateral action”
I ask “As in Iraq?”
Report thisBy hollyse, April 18, 2008 at 8:09 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
What’s McCain Smoking? The answer is “My Friends”.
Report thisThat in itself is total consumption of each and all of us.
By ocjim, April 18, 2008 at 1:21 am #
McCain and Clinton are not only elitists but also phoneys. And you could probably add hypocrit to that noun of distinction.
Report thisBy Fadel Abdallah, April 17, 2008 at 8:25 pm #
With McCain and Clinton commenting on the fictionalized elitism of Obama, it seems to me that this ugly pair are totally confused about the perceptions language is supposed to convey. Those linguistically incompetent aggrandizement-seekers cannot be trusted to be competent to run the affairs of this country! Let them go to grammar school first!
When I see the white yellowish faces of McCain and Clinton I am reminded of death and I feel depressed. Yet, when I see the naturally-tanned face of Obama, with his lively beautiful smile, hope is revived inside me! For me, the difference between McCain / Clinton on the one hand, and Obama, on the other hand, is the difference between death and the hope of life.
Report thisBy Conservative Yankee, April 17, 2008 at 4:04 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
They suffered the worst during the Depression, but it did not shake their faith in, and fidelity to, America. They did not turn to their religious faith and cultural traditions out of resentment and a feeling of powerlessness to affect the course of government or pursue prosperity. On the contrary, their faith had given generations of their families purpose and meaning, as it does today.
There is no one on earth who revers the “Greatest Generation” more than I
BUT
During the depression there were bloody Union battles in the Mines, in the Factories and on the Farm. There was the greatest Klan membership in that organization’s history. There was an anti immigrant orgy which makes the current dust-up over immigrants look like the Welcome-Wagon.
Members of “The Greatest Generation” Included Lester Maddox, George Wallace, Bull (sic ‘em) Connor, Byron de la Beckwith, and Father Divine (Who makes Jerry Wright look like Uncle Tom)
History, folks, is set in stone as long as there are people who remember people places & things. Writing a column like the one above only serves to confuse those who were not witness to events!
Report thisBy BobZ, April 17, 2008 at 2:00 pm #
What is McCain smoking? Our capitalistic system almost went into the tank in the 30’s. There was widespread disillusionment and bitterness by folks who lost their life savings, had their homes foreclosed, and had to move across the country in a search to find jobs. Many of them flirted with Communism and Socialism. FDR saved our capitalistic economic system but got little thanks from Wall Street or the Republican Party who fought him for his entire 12 years as president. FDR restored the faith of citizens in their country by his bold actions as president and by his ability to connect to the country. Talk to the people who lived through that period. They are the most die hard Democrats you will ever meet. FDR was God to them!
Report thisBy Ivan Hentschel, April 17, 2008 at 12:32 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
McCain has largely sold out anything he may have ever believed in, in order to become POTUS. The “elite” are supposed to be the chosen few, the best of the best, the cream of the crop. It has been a poorly chosen label in recent days. In the end, McCain stands for nothing. He is a war monger, a potential tyrant and a two-faced, increasingly bald faced liar. And his wife steals recipes.Now what kind of an elitist recommendation IS THAT?
Report thisBy cyrena, April 17, 2008 at 11:43 am #
I love it…especially the Jack part. After reading about Hill have drinks with the boys, I decided to splurge on a bottle of Jack myself. (Can’t do the beer though..Bud or any other kind). I have to replace it with soda pop.
And Mac should just kiss everybody’s ass, if only to avoid getting his own kicked…
Report thisBy bert, April 17, 2008 at 11:36 am #
Purple Girl, what the heck are you trying to say in this post. You certainly do not say. Your ramblings are not on point.
“How dare these two speak” What two? Who are you referring to? McCain? Hagel and Webb? Conoson?
“both are condescending , patronizing Veranda sitting sweet tea drinking Corporationist.” Here you are again refering to “both” without telling who it is you are rferring to.
This makes no sense.
Report thisBy mofolo, April 17, 2008 at 11:24 am #
McCain primarly is doing what ever he can to discourage votes for Obama. He knows that will be a battle he won’t win. He wants Hillary to be the guy he is running against to insure another Republican win. So basically Obama currently has two opponents, the lady who would destroy the Democratic party for a chance to run and the old man who might not make four years of being president with all the stress that entails.
Report thisBy Homer Hewitt, April 17, 2008 at 10:02 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Obama is an “elitist”. So says the down-to-earth middle class lady, from the White House, Chappaqua, and Nantucket.
It is so disheartening to think that, with all the problems and opportunities in the U.S. and the world, this election could possibly be decided by an inept description of a cultural situation or perhaps one or two words, “bitter”, or “cling
homer http://www.altara.blogspot.com
Report thisBy Purple Girl, April 17, 2008 at 9:05 am #
The slaves of the Plantation are beginning to rise Up and our first order of business is to kick th eMasters out of the House and never allow another to take it’s place. How dare these two speak as if they know anything about the people who built this country. both are condescending , patronizing Veranda sitting sweet tea drinking Corporationist. “look how they can take a beating and still, roll up their sleeves and sing their happy songs of hope’. this Mi’er would love to take both of them to a Bar in this state- by the way We drink Jack & Bud, and still smoke. When ya got nothing to look forward to who cares about lungs & livers! We’re drowning our sorrows for our children who Their Corp Sponsors are placing on the futures Auction Block!
Report thisBy Sang Ze, April 17, 2008 at 7:34 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Face it. Like him or not, McCain is going to be the next president. The Democrats have not been able to field a candidate worth a vote, and there is no evidence they intend to do so at the convention. The yahoos who have been clawing at each other for months have made their party look inept and stupid. Either they are blind, or they don’t care about the people they pretend to serve. McCain has offered concrete policies, is well-informed, and knows that perpetual war is necessary. What more culd one want?
Report thisBy jackpine savage, April 17, 2008 at 6:57 am #
There’s nothing like selective history to prop up mythology…
No, nobody was bitter between the first and second World Wars. There was no Bonus Army. And the Communist Party didn’t enjoy the best success of its history in America during those years. Sen. McCain also seems quick to forget that the Republican Party wanted nothing to do with WW II until after Pearl Harbor. (Shall we discuss the possibility of a President allowing an attack on American soil to go undefended to provoke the American people into going to war?)
If American schools actually taught history and Americans actually cared about education, then we wouldn’t be so easily bamboozled by the fools who rule.
And if the American people (i.e. the government) aren’t willing to give a leg up to the men and women who are willing to give a leg in service to their country, then don’t be surprised to see another Bonus Army marching on Washington somewhere between the end of the first decade and the beginning of the third decade of the 21st Century.
Report this