LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
February 8, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

The Cancer in Occupy

Europe Decides Not to Play America's Game

Sweatshops

Bill Moyers Makes Newt Gingrich Look Like an Idiot

Rick Santorum's Big Night

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * The Great Carbon Bubble
The Uninspired GOP Electorate

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar
The Future of Liberalism

The Future of Liberalism

By Alan Wolfe
$17.13

Conversations With Scorsese

Conversations With Scorsese

By Richard Schickel
$19.80

more items

 
Reports

Colorado Still Sneers at Labor

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Share
Posted on Apr 17, 2008

By David Sirota

Editor’s note: This is the second of two columns looking at the legacy of the Ludlow Massacre on its 94th anniversary.

The Ludlow Massacre’s tiny monument off I-25 in southern Colorado is easily missed if you don’t know where to find it. Though the nearby coal mine garnered international attention in 1914 after a government militia slaughtered union organizers there, the minimalism of the memorial is predictable. History books venerate Rockefellers—the union-busting mine owners—and disregard agents of progress like the labor movement.

But remember the parable about those ignoring history repeating it, particularly on April 20—the anniversary of the atrocity. As noted in last week’s column, the methods of Ludlow are being celebrated in our foreign policy. But they are also being trumpeted at home.

The Bush administration has abandoned American workers. While not sending militias to execute labor organizers, the feds now look away as corporations kill unions before they are ever born. And today many states are replicating that anti-union model.

A few years ago in Florida, labor leaders had to fight to remove language from a local government’s administrative code that said “unions would not help workers, and the county would oppose unions by any lawful means,” according to the Fort Myers News-Press. California’s state government has accelerated the outsourcing of public services to private contractors in order to avoid employing unionized workers—even though the practice costs taxpayers more money. The governors of Missouri and Indiana have eliminated public employees’ right to collectively bargain.

Advertisement

In Colorado, the persecution is most pronounced. You might think that because the reputation-staining Ludlow Massacre happened in that state, Colorado politicians would hesitate to further brutalize the labor movement. But just as racism still exists in the post-Jim Crow South, elected officials in Colorado still rough up workers—and lately that includes Democrats like Gov. Bill Ritter.

In 2007, he vetoed a bill eliminating unfair obstacles to unionization that exist only in Colorado. Though he later signed a modest order recognizing public employee unions (a recognition they have in most states), he also backed the concept of forced labor by endorsing legislation to ban those employees from striking. The Rocky Mountain News recalls that this right to strike was paid for in blood, with the Legislature originally granting it as penance for Ludlow.

Now, Ritter is berating labor-backed measures to help workers during the recession. On conservative talk radio, he attacked a ballot initiative asking employers to provide inflation-linked subsistence pay increases for employees. Ritter apologists say he hopes his position convinces corporate interests to halt their “right to work” initiative that would crush unions by limiting labor’s ability to collect dues. The rationale only proves the persistence of the anti-worker Ludlow legacy. This Democrat is countering a bid to totally destroy unions by helping prevent workers from getting the most minimum of raises.

Like so many politicians, Ritter is choosing the anti-union path of Elias Ammons, Colorado’s Democratic governor during the Ludlow Massacre.

As recounted in Scott Martelle’s book “Blood Passion,” Ammons was elected with union support, then became obsessed with finding an imaginary middle ground between business and labor, and ended up “aligning with neither.” His Colorado militia initiated the Ludlow Massacre to stop unions from forcing corporations to improve wages and working conditions. Ammons lost in his bid for re-election after one term.

Today, Ritter emulates Ammons by refusing to answer that age-old labor movement question: Which side are you on? Elected on the backs of workers, his priority is appeasing a business community just as rapacious as it was in 1914.

Ludlow’s legacy is indeed alive and well. The same story of worker repression and political cowardice that brought on a massacre is again unfolding in Colorado—and all over the country.

David Sirota is a best-selling author whose newest book, “The Uprising,” will be released in June. He is a fellow at the Campaign for America’s Future and a board member of the Progressive States Network, both nonpartisan organizations. His blog is at www.credoaction.com/sirota.

© 2008 Creators Syndicate Inc.


Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By Singingsophist, June 13, 2008 at 2:05 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Conservative Yankee: THANK YOU for the links!!!!!!!  I have been looking for that kind of (sensibly researched) information for a very long time.

Report this

By Pendelton, April 20, 2008 at 7:43 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Perhaps you don’t understand the great disparity of corporation renumeration for CEO’s compared to the lowest employee on the company’s ladder.

  Perhaps you still have your head in the sand

  The current administration, of what once was a great country, will go down in history as the most corrupt. Making the Roman empire look like a girl scout troop in comparison

Report this

By TDoff, April 20, 2008 at 5:28 am Link to this comment

In these enlightened days of US Capitalism, we don’t need no stinkin’ unions.

With CEO’s free to steal from their companies, their stockholders, the government, their customers, each other, let the workers take their chances!

Why should they be set aside as a privileged class?

Report this

By Conservative Yankee, April 20, 2008 at 5:21 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Rather than “obsolete” as Mr Giacobbe states; Unions are due for a rebirth without all the corrupting influences which made them ineffective.

The Chicken processing business would be a fine place to begin that rebirth. Some workers (mostly African American females) come to work wearing “Depends” because there is a four hour run with no bathroom break.

The cutting floor is covered with blood, no protective clothing is provided, and injuries often (if reported) result in a discharge of the injured worker.

http://watchdog.gainesville.com/default.asp?item=784722

Itinerant farm workers are also abused in their work place. They work on land drenched in pesticide, they often have their children in the fields with them many of the laws intended to protect workers are “waived” for agricultural workers. Their rate of cancer is 50 percent above that of the general population.

http://www.splcenter.org/news/item.jsp?aid=308

http://medicine.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371/journal.pmed.0030448&ct=1

Here in Maine woods crews and people imported to work in the “fish farms” are treated so poorly that local churches have launched a drive to get them clothing and medical care. Maybe a decent union could get the companies to issue them a pair of gloves for working outside in January… (the average January temperature in my part of Maine is -0-.

Report this

By Jane, April 20, 2008 at 4:37 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

In california, of all places, what’s the intention here?: first, give them what they want(wage increases up to 19% to keep up with hiring and detention). Then later, steathly, abolish the traditional union practices such as union reps, and replaced them with resolution center(the Corporate model). The answer for this: the members are all happy.

Report this

By Eric, April 19, 2008 at 11:21 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I seriously doubt those workers that rightly sacrificed their lives did so such that their comrades in 2008 can have the choice of 3 lunch menus, can be guaranteed a rotating slot in the parking space closest to the plant entrance, can have cable TV in the union’s lounge, can have a covered, climate-controlled outbuilding for smokers, and other highly-critical benefits that are CLEARLY tied to fundamental human rights in the workplace.

I see.  So management folks are the only ones deserving of these perks?  I don’t think so.  Once again, I have to say that your beef with these working conditions should have been taken up with the management of the company who agreed to these terms and conditions in negotiations.  You seem to have no experience in union/management contract negotiations or else you would know this plain, simple fact. 

No, the workplace things that were paid in blood include the right to organize unions, the 8-hour workday, minimum wage, workplace safety issues and child labor laws. If management folks (you know, the multi-millionaires who run the Fortune 50 companies you keep bringing up) agree to give the workers extra perks such as cable tv (which was most certainly already in the management offices), a covered, climate controlled outbuilding for smokers (do you believe that the workers don’t deserve a roof nor heat?) or one parking spot close to the plan entrance (I guess you feel management deserves all of the parking spots closest to the building) then I salute them for respecting their workers in this fashion. 

It’s a good think companies such as Wal-Mart don’t have to put up with such onerous things like providing cable television, menu choices for lunch, covered lounge areas or reserving a single parking spot.  It would probably cause the collapse of that company! 
Your ad-hominem attacks and insults, along with your weak examples of union largess, hardly prove your point that unions are causing their own demise.  To me they just prove you an anti-union person who thinks that these organizations are an impediment. 

Oh, and if you think you are wasting your time with this then don’t reply.  Or keep replying in Italian so you can keep insulting folks with vulgarities.  I’m sure that makes you feel vastly superior.

Report this

By Joan G. Moore, April 19, 2008 at 5:35 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

A management consultant…that says it all.  Union busting has become really big business in this country since Reagan busted the Air Traffic Controllers.  It is your business to denigrate workers and union contracts and to sell the “safe and effective workplace culture” which translate in reality to union free enviroment.  Was your “extensive experience” at Walmart?  ...there is a company that will do anything to avoid unionization…anything.
You are right about one thing.  In the days of the Ludlow massacre, the bosses were up front and ruthless in thier violence and they lost public support.  Now they hire high priced union busters and call them consultants…but the ruthlessness is still there.  The abuses are still there too.  The US has the worst Worker health and safety record of any industrialized country…and employers routinely cook the books keeping those records.  The laws and agencies at the state and federal level to protect people against the abuse of employers are only as good as the enforcement…and that is non existant since the 1980s. 
I don’t know that I believe the examples of union rules you have found so objectionable, but do I need to remind you that union contracts are not unilateral agreements?  The employers have to agree to these rules too and there is always give and take in collective bargaining.
Im a retired labor leader.  I have seen the declining working conditions, along with good union jobs erode for these last 3 decades.  The future of our children and grandchildren as well as USA is not good and I blame the greed and corruptions I have witnessed personally in the corporate world and the high priced management consultants who put a happy face on the whole sorry mess.
We need real labor law reform to create a level playing field.  We are at least 60 years behind the rest of the industrialized world in recognition of workers rights.  This is not an isolated issue.  It was labor that advanced the concept of public education.  It is the Labor Parties that demand universal healthcare in more civilized countries than ours. Labor has a role and should have a voice in foreign policy too.  Every aspect of public policy is the interest of the Labor movement.
American Capitalism is a failure.  It has ignored the other half of the equation, Labor, to it’s detriment and ultimate demise.  It is just a matter of time now unless Labor raises it’s powerful fist again…..but I have little real hope of that at this point in our history.
The Bosses have won….and everyone will lose in the end….including the union busters.

Report this

By Eric, April 19, 2008 at 11:09 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

And for each example you list about some nit-picking little detail that makes you so anti-union (Management not buying you lunch?  How terrible!) there are thousands of examples of unions benefitting both management and workers.  The workplace rules you mention had been paid by the blood of the workers and union organizers killed in the past by management militias or management-influenced public servants (army and police).  Those workplace rules were hard-fought.  Just because they are now laws doesn’t make unions obsolete.  Those rules still have to be enforced and there are management folks and government officials who cannot be trusted to enforce those rules. 
As for your complaint about not being able to press a button or your complaint about the work rules at your factory?  You should have realized that your bosses were the ones that negotiated the contract with the union in the first place and established those rules.  Your ire should have been directed at your bosses who agreed to those rules, not the workers who abided by them.  If there were workers who did hate the job and the company, it’s little wonder - your attitude towards them…

“sniveling, chronically-unhappy employees who so hated their company and management that you could qualify their behavior as workplace sabotage; and, unionized workforces that have so retreated into their glass-house union world that they absolutely refuse to share any accountability or blame for their company’s performance, despite them coming into work every day and fucking shit up.”

... tells me you did your fair share to poison the waters. 
You say in one section of your post

Unions are like the appendix…

…an obsolete and potentially dangerous organ that can kill you if it blows up.

, and then in another section of the same post you say

Look, I recognize the need long-ago for unions and the fundamental right to collective bargaining, and I would fight any attempt to completely disband unions or deny their access to a CBA.

.  You sure are confused.

Report this

By KISS, April 19, 2008 at 10:57 am Link to this comment

There will always be the lame-brain that are union nay-sayers, and cannot see the Fascist control that has overtaken our government, both local and federal.

Thanks David for seeing that Emperor Bill Ritter was not clothed. So very sad to see dimmos that are really repugs in disguise. Postulating lies and innuendos while making sure that their monetary shares are rising, It must be the same mentality of CEO’s scourging the corporations and stock-holders.


An excellent documentary is Harlan County, USA is a 1976 Academy Award winning documentary film covering the efforts of 180 coal miners on strike against the Duke Power Company in Harlan County, Kentucky in 1973. It was directed by Barbara Kopple, who has long been an advocate of workers’ rights.


Harlan county mine war was in 1973 so it is not some distant memory of long ago. As I said in your part one this is in keeping with the mine disasters due to faulty or no inspections along with bribing of mine inspectors and intimidation, of this past couple of years…in other words nothing has really changed. Unions are in a back-slide and I’m willing to say mostly due to the workers own laziness or ineptness. We know how Hillary feels from her statements in the 90’s..” Screw-‘em” concerning the Arkansas workers.


Going right along with the disintegration of unions is the lack of safe-guards for mine workers and the environment. These federal laws go back to before 1900’s when robber-barons controlled the law makers.. same as today.

Report this

By Conservative Yankee, April 19, 2008 at 10:49 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I’ve often wondered why so many assholes congregate in absolutely beautiful areas.  New Hampshire, Maine, Idaho Florida, just chocked full of narcissistic idiots.

This morning Maine’s northern newspaper ran a story about one of our assistant attorney generals. It appears he has a predilection for cocaine and sex with small children.

Report this

By Conservative Yankee, April 19, 2008 at 10:35 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Mr. Giacobbe is certainly entitled to his opinion. Maybe in his world managers and owners treat their employees with love and respect, and pay them a living wage.

I do hope that hell for scabs and union-busters is an eternity working in a chicken processing plant, preferably on the line.

Report this

By TDoff, April 19, 2008 at 8:52 am Link to this comment

Coloradans just appear to be sneering. Actually, they are always sneezing or near-sneezing, due to the enormous amounts of coke they consume, which is readily apparent by the dusting of white powder that covers the whole state, almost year ‘round.
Aberrations like Ted Haggard, and his penchant for doping with same-sex prostitutes while presiding over the largest Colorado church congregation, result from this addiction to Colorado mind-bending. That explains why so many apparently irrational ‘conservative’ ‘think’ tanks headquarter there, they are seeking psychotic relief from their twisted values, deviated septums be damned.
How does Colorado maintain this environment, while maintaining a much higher population of same-sex-drug-addicted prostitutes than DEA agents?
Because it’s civic ‘leaders’ have the reputation of being staunch conservatives, despite their hypocritical predelictions, as messengers in direct contact with the almighty, which they are able to claim while maintaining straight faces; because they have strong contacts in Washington; and because ‘Image is Everything’ in their society, and they are good at faking it.
They make their money by seducing tithes from the gullible, various tax scams, and clipping coupons as members of the ‘lucky sperm’ club. The concept of ‘labor’ is anathema to them, which is why they abhor anyone who claims to recognize, let alone ‘organize’, ‘labor’.
Unions would have more luck organizing the ‘cottage’ owners on Martha’s Vineyard, than setting up shop in Colorado.

Report this

By proletariatprincess, April 19, 2008 at 7:33 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Like the old Labor Song:
“...without our brain and muscle not a single wheel would turn….”

Imagine a nationwide general strike.  Imagine the power of workers united…..just imagine people who work for a wage demanding the real value of thier labor including dignity and respect…bread and roses.
The Labor movement will never completely be defeated….even the workers on the pyramids organized for better conditions and engaged in the first strike in recorded history.  The bosses always overreact to organized workers because they are afraid of the potential power of real class struggle.  Brutality crushed the miners at Ludlow but it didn’t kill the movement.  It is weakened and demoralized now, but it isn’t gone and never will be. There are more of us than there are of them….“greater than the might of armies magnified a thousand fold”.

Report this
Leefeller's avatar

By Leefeller, April 19, 2008 at 6:30 am Link to this comment

When people work for someone they always demand much more than they are worth, they want benefits, perks lots of time off, sick leave a heafty medical plan.  Even if they only wanted a living wage, I believe they are paid way to much. But what can you do with politicians when they vote themselves a raise?

Report this

By proletariatprincess, April 18, 2008 at 6:47 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I know it is difficult and dangerous, but I often wonder why workers are more not rising up against the injustices and persecutions that we continue to see around the country.  They did in the 30s and before the Wagner Act when unions were illegal in many parts of the country. Employers want slaves, even if they have to pay them wages. Money isnt really the issue…tho they will always say it is.  What they really dont want, and will fight with all thier strength to prevent, is workers rights in the workplace and Labor to have an effective voice on at the national and state level.  It is class warfare pure and simple, but american workers dont seem to recognize to what class they belong.

Report this

By Conservative Yankee, April 18, 2008 at 4:57 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

By Purple Girl, April 18 at 3:38 am

“I stayed - found my replacement, trained him and even continued to help by phone . These companies have failed to recognize their utter dependence of the Workers”

I understand that people do what they have to do, BUT your statement of service to this company is about the most anti-union position I have ever encountered.

Did you get paid when you “continued to help by phone”? Did you get paid additional for serving outside your defined duties by “training your replacement”? 

Of course “companies have failed to recognize their utter dependence of the Workers” How can they when they are being protected from this knowledge by workers with a misplaced sense of loyalty?

Report this
Purple Girl's avatar

By Purple Girl, April 18, 2008 at 3:38 am Link to this comment

The most disgusting example of this Doctrine is being used in the state that gave life to the Workers Right movements- Michigan.
I had a boss tell me he could fire me when ever eh wanted- just because he didn’t like the way I look one day. this pissed me off- Loafer wearing sockless ‘Sonny Corleone’Wannabe MF’er. so I said that was fair I could decide to not show up to work anymore when ever I didn’t like the way he treated me- I was the only employee in the Dept, and was the only one who knew how it ran & where everything was.I’d have screwed him harder than he could have screwed me! That Shut him up fast. After that converstion I began looking for a new job. If I didn’t care about my future refences and my dislike for Burning Bridges I would have Walked out then & there, but I didn’t- not for Him , but for ME and my felow employee who would have suffered do to the lapse of anew hire & their ‘learning curve’ . I stayed - found my replacement, trained him and even continued to help by phone . These companies have failed to recognize their utter dependence of the Workers- Without US, they would have no plush office to work at, nor the high priced cars to get them there.

Cave Adsum Inc America!

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






                        Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?

Are you a human? Retype the word you see here.

     

Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.