![]() ![]() |
![]() |
| |
|
Colorado Still Sneers at LaborPosted on Apr 17, 2008By David Sirota Editor’s note: This is the second of two columns looking at the legacy of the Ludlow Massacre on its 94th anniversary. The Ludlow Massacre’s tiny monument off I-25 in southern Colorado is easily missed if you don’t know where to find it. Though the nearby coal mine garnered international attention in 1914 after a government militia slaughtered union organizers there, the minimalism of the memorial is predictable. History books venerate Rockefellers—the union-busting mine owners—and disregard agents of progress like the labor movement. But remember the parable about those ignoring history repeating it, particularly on April 20—the anniversary of the atrocity. As noted in last week’s column, the methods of Ludlow are being celebrated in our foreign policy. But they are also being trumpeted at home. The Bush administration has abandoned American workers. While not sending militias to execute labor organizers, the feds now look away as corporations kill unions before they are ever born. And today many states are replicating that anti-union model. A few years ago in Florida, labor leaders had to fight to remove language from a local government’s administrative code that said “unions would not help workers, and the county would oppose unions by any lawful means,” according to the Fort Myers News-Press. California’s state government has accelerated the outsourcing of public services to private contractors in order to avoid employing unionized workers—even though the practice costs taxpayers more money. The governors of Missouri and Indiana have eliminated public employees’ right to collectively bargain. In Colorado, the persecution is most pronounced. You might think that because the reputation-staining Ludlow Massacre happened in that state, Colorado politicians would hesitate to further brutalize the labor movement. But just as racism still exists in the post-Jim Crow South, elected officials in Colorado still rough up workers—and lately that includes Democrats like Gov. Bill Ritter. In 2007, he vetoed a bill eliminating unfair obstacles to unionization that exist only in Colorado. Though he later signed a modest order recognizing public employee unions (a recognition they have in most states), he also backed the concept of forced labor by endorsing legislation to ban those employees from striking. The Rocky Mountain News recalls that this right to strike was paid for in blood, with the Legislature originally granting it as penance for Ludlow. Now, Ritter is berating labor-backed measures to help workers during the recession. On conservative talk radio, he attacked a ballot initiative asking employers to provide inflation-linked subsistence pay increases for employees. Ritter apologists say he hopes his position convinces corporate interests to halt their “right to work” initiative that would crush unions by limiting labor’s ability to collect dues. The rationale only proves the persistence of the anti-worker Ludlow legacy. This Democrat is countering a bid to totally destroy unions by helping prevent workers from getting the most minimum of raises. Like so many politicians, Ritter is choosing the anti-union path of Elias Ammons, Colorado’s Democratic governor during the Ludlow Massacre. As recounted in Scott Martelle’s book “Blood Passion,” Ammons was elected with union support, then became obsessed with finding an imaginary middle ground between business and labor, and ended up “aligning with neither.” His Colorado militia initiated the Ludlow Massacre to stop unions from forcing corporations to improve wages and working conditions. Ammons lost in his bid for re-election after one term. Today, Ritter emulates Ammons by refusing to answer that age-old labor movement question: Which side are you on? Elected on the backs of workers, his priority is appeasing a business community just as rapacious as it was in 1914. Ludlow’s legacy is indeed alive and well. The same story of worker repression and political cowardice that brought on a massacre is again unfolding in Colorado—and all over the country. David Sirota is a best-selling author whose newest book, “The Uprising,” will be released in June. He is a fellow at the Campaign for America’s Future and a board member of the Progressive States Network, both nonpartisan organizations. His blog is at www.credoaction.com/sirota. © 2008 Creators Syndicate Inc. Previous item: Substance for Those Who Were Patient Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.
By Pendelton, April 20 at 7:43 pm # Re: TDoffPerhaps you don’t understand the great disparity of corporation renumeration for CEO’s compared to the lowest employee on the company’s ladder. Perhaps you still have your head in the sand The current administration, of what once was a great country, will go down in history as the most corrupt. Making the Roman empire look like a girl scout troop in comparison
By Jane, April 20 at 4:37 am # In california, of all places, what’s the intention here?: first, give them what they want(wage increases up to 19% to keep up with hiring and detention). Then later, steathly, abolish the traditional union practices such as union reps, and replaced them with resolution center(the Corporate model). The answer for this: the members are all happy.
By Eric, April 19 at 11:09 am # And for each example you list about some nit-picking little detail that makes you so anti-union (Management not buying you lunch? How terrible!) there are thousands of examples of unions benefitting both management and workers. The workplace rules you mention had been paid by the blood of the workers and union organizers killed in the past by management militias or management-influenced public servants (army and police). Those workplace rules were hard-fought. Just because they are now laws doesn’t make unions obsolete. Those rules still have to be enforced and there are management folks and government officials who cannot be trusted to enforce those rules.
… tells me you did your fair share to poison the waters. , and then in another section of the same post you say . You sure are confused.
By Conservative Yankee, April 20 at 5:21 am # Unions as phoenixRather than “obsolete” as Mr Giacobbe states; Unions are due for a rebirth without all the corrupting influences which made them ineffective. The Chicken processing business would be a fine place to begin that rebirth. Some workers (mostly African American females) come to work wearing “Depends” because there is a four hour run with no bathroom break. The cutting floor is covered with blood, no protective clothing is provided, and injuries often (if reported) result in a discharge of the injured worker. http://watchdog.gainesville.com/default.asp?item=784722 Itinerant farm workers are also abused in their work place. They work on land drenched in pesticide, they often have their children in the fields with them many of the laws intended to protect workers are “waived” for agricultural workers. Their rate of cancer is 50 percent above that of the general population. http://www.splcenter.org/news/item.jsp?aid=308 Here in Maine woods crews and people imported to work in the “fish farms” are treated so poorly that local churches have launched a drive to get them clothing and medical care. Maybe a decent union could get the companies to issue them a pair of gloves for working outside in January… (the average January temperature in my part of Maine is -0-.
By Conservative Yankee, April 19 at 10:49 am # Not only ColoradoI’ve often wondered why so many assholes congregate in absolutely beautiful areas. New Hampshire, Maine, Idaho Florida, just chocked full of narcissistic idiots. This morning Maine’s northern newspaper ran a story about one of our assistant attorney generals. It appears he has a predilection for cocaine and sex with small children.
By proletariatprincess, April 19 at 7:33 am # Solidarity foreverLike the old Labor Song: Imagine a nationwide general strike. Imagine the power of workers united.....just imagine people who work for a wage demanding the real value of thier labor including dignity and respect...bread and roses.
By proletariatprincess, April 18 at 6:47 am # why arent American workers more militant?I know it is difficult and dangerous, but I often wonder why workers are more not rising up against the injustices and persecutions that we continue to see around the country. They did in the 30s and before the Wagner Act when unions were illegal in many parts of the country. Employers want slaves, even if they have to pay them wages. Money isnt really the issue...tho they will always say it is. What they really dont want, and will fight with all thier strength to prevent, is workers rights in the workplace and Labor to have an effective voice on at the national and state level. It is class warfare pure and simple, but american workers dont seem to recognize to what class they belong.
By Conservative Yankee, April 18 at 4:57 am # Anti-UnionBy Purple Girl, April 18 at 3:38 am “I stayed - found my replacement, trained him and even continued to help by phone . These companies have failed to recognize their utter dependence of the Workers” I understand that people do what they have to do, BUT your statement of service to this company is about the most anti-union position I have ever encountered. Did you get paid when you “continued to help by phone”? Did you get paid additional for serving outside your defined duties by “training your replacement”? Of course “companies have failed to recognize their utter dependence of the Workers” How can they when they are being protected from this knowledge by workers with a misplaced sense of loyalty? Add Your Comment |
COMMENT TOOLS:
Hide comments
Show comments
Comment on this article