![]() |
|
||
|
Family TiesPosted on Apr 17, 2008BOSTON—I always thought that genealogy was for people whose blood ran blue. It was for folks who traced their ancestry to the Mayflower or the American Revolution, not those who came over in steerage one step ahead of the Cossacks. So when the New England Historic Genealogical Society published the family connections between presidential candidates and celebrities, I was an amused bystander. John McCain is the sixth cousin of Laura Bush? Hillary Clinton is the ninth cousin twice removed of Angelina Jolie? Barack Obama is related to everyone from the Bushes to Brad Pitt? How American, I thought, to search an entire family tree to connect with the rich and famous who live, twice removed, on some distant branch. On a lark, I went to visit D. Brenton Simons, the genial head of NEHGS, the society founded in 1845. Simons has so many American presidents in his own ancestry that he stops counting after Washington, Adams, Van Buren and FDR. But what he finds most fascinating are the everyday ordinary searches through the 200,000 books and the 28 million manuscripts, papers and diaries that fill the building in Boston’s Back Bay. “You can be related to a king or a horse thief,” says Simons, who shows no favoritism for either lineage. “We all make discoveries that surprise and enlighten us.” So it is that I casually handed over a few names and dates from my own memory bank. I didn’t find a king or horse thief or Hollywood star, but I found a family secret. A garden-variety secret, I am sure, but a secret nonetheless. Advertisement Funny how data can set your head spinning. What did this say about my grandparents and the origin of their long, loving, imperfect marriage? About their passion or imprudence or the world they lived in 95 years ago? Suddenly, my grandmother, whom I remember with great fondness as a cleanliness freak, the subject of much family humor, comes alive as a young woman. Suddenly, my grandfather, who led me by the hand into Red Sox Nation, is a young man. Were they lovers whose affection culminated happily in marriage? Or was this a shotgun wedding? What was it like in 1913 for a young couple to find that she’s pregnant? What happened if and when they told their parents? And what of my mother, who never, at least consciously, knew this? My aunt cannot remember hearing the story of her parents’ courtship. There is no wedding photo. While we celebrated their 40th anniversary, none of us can even remember what time of year that party was held. Did this secret infiltrate all their, our, lives? A lot or a little? There is, for example, my great-grandmother, who regularly warned her beautiful granddaughter—my mother—that she would come to no good. Am I required now to rewrite that old woman’s malevolence differently, as colored by her own daughter’s experience? Am I required to rethink the legacy my grandparents left me, beyond the soup pot that I cherish? Too soon old, too late ... curious. There are other bits of paper in my genealogical binder. It’s moving to see the name of the actual ship that brought my family to America and the naturalization papers that required them to “renounce forever all allegiance and fidelity” to Czar Nicholas II—which they must have done with pleasure. But what we really want from the generations past are not just the facts or the DNA. We want the stories. Love, passion, success, disappointment, humanity. There may be no way to know—really know—their interior life. But how many of us would trade in the data for one good diary? Will we remember that in our own “estate planning”? Maybe you read about the Connecticut teenager, Addie Avery, who searched her lineage back to a 17th century ancestor hanged for witchcraft. She’s petitioning the state to exonerate her foremother. Recently, David A. Wilson, a black journalist, and David B. Wilson, a white restaurant owner, found their connection through a slave-owning ancestor. One generation’s shame becomes another’s rich tapestry. One generation’s secret becomes another’s source of wonder. “We all have tens of thousands of cousins,” says Simons, whose researchers connected Clinton with Jolie, Obama with Bush. “You can walk down the street right past a third or fourth cousin and not know it.” But how I wish I could stop one couple on the street for just a question or two. The couple who were married on Feb. 3, 1914. Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment
|
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved. |
By DHFabian, July 14, 2008 at 9:24 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Actually, premarital sex in the early 1900’s (and before) was not unusual. A difference between then and now is that once the couple decided to marry,
Report thisand had sex, there was no “backing out”. As long as they did marry, the fact that the pregnancy preceded the wedding was irrelevant. Premarital sex was not something that people discussed, but was simply a normal part of how people lived.
By MAR, April 18, 2008 at 12:39 pm #
. . . particularly for those who have made the journey themselves. It is not difficult now with the Internet. I spent five years finding some skeletons and answers - no princes or presidents - I am afraid that I too might be related to George Bush as that is one of the variants in New York that I found. I did find a few “third cousins” who had already done the work and had made their findings available to me. Not the Mayflower, but soon after - a Dutch/Belgian who was born on the ship in the Atlantic and who landed about 1629 in what was Neu Amsterdam, an Englishman who landed in 1636. Perhaps it was this line that drew me to this website. Their descendants chose to be Loyalists in the American Revolution and fled persecution in 1784 (beatings, loss of their land, theft of their money and goods) to what was called Upper Canada, then some more again from England, more from Scotland. All just plain folks who fled oppression or poverty and were the pioneer folks who were the cutting edge in opening up North America, across the prairies to the Pacific.
Lest anyone look for Princes or early Normans, remember the advice that an expert gave to me. “Only the mother knows who the father really was, and maybe not even her.” This is the fatal flaw in all genealogy except where the actual act was witnessed in the case of royalty - and maybe not even then as Mario Puzo’s tale of the Borgias “The Family” so clearly says. Lots of nasties, too: incest, impregnation by a young blade of a good family, the latter buying off the problem in the days of prudery by an arranged “marriage” with someone who would give their name for a few bucks; thieves and murderers, counterfeiters and so on.
Much cheaper than a hundred years ago - thanks to the Internet and the Mormon church, which for some quirk have spend millions acquiring and storing images of records that are available for almost nothing to anybody. I appreciated that, even though I am not religious.
Report thisBy GrammaConcept, April 17, 2008 at 11:22 am #
of our enemies, we should find in each person’s liife sorrow and suffering enough to disarm all hostility.”
-Henry Wadsworth Longfellow
And, if we knew the secret history of ourselves, we would find there the illuminated knowledge that we are not, and never were, ‘naked apes’, but rather, we are clothed angels…......with much to live Up to…
Strive On, Friends and Relations All, Strive On….
Report thisBy Jim Yell, April 17, 2008 at 9:33 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Over all I thought this a good article, but I do get tired of judgements that are made, such as slave owning-a families shame. My only comment on that is there is plenty of shame to go around. Slavery was not addressed by most religion and societies and in any case they all gave the power to the slave owner, no matter how enlightened and supposedly promoted good treatment.
For all the hysterical reactions to peoples sexuality, none of it is different than it was 100 or 100 of years ago. Mostly in the days of draconian reaction to what is really mostly each persons own business, the punitive nature of that reaction made people take hypocritical stances and react in hateful manner. Good people in the old days did not count the months or weeks from marriage to birth, if they noticed they kept it to themselves or the gossip of the bedchamber.
There is nothing wrong with welcoming the notibles in everyones family, but always remember that neither their worst crimes, nor their greatest actions belong to anyone but themselves.
There are bean counter researchers and there are celeberity searchers, but I like the stories which too few survive and the epiphanies as mentioned that suddenly give flesh to long dead bones.
Report thisBy Purple Girl, April 17, 2008 at 9:17 am #
Over the last year I too have been researching my ancestory. Have found long held ‘truths’ were inaccurate (Not Irish, but far more Scotch- but even farther back Normans). i’ve found interesting tidbits about how tow families moved through time together, intermigling repeatedly, most recent my Great gand father & mother. Been having some dificulty finding all the links, esp once in Ireland -run out, Jacobites.
Report thisfunny though how one eras criminals & scoundrals may actually be another eras mailgned heros.
I find a great deal in common with those who share my ancestoral names- is free thinking, rebellousness a genetic trait, are we mere ‘Re runs’ from generation to generation. is there a innate organization to Consciousness, actors to fill necessary roles? Worth contemplating, maybe we are all Just actors in a Play.
By SamSnedegar, April 17, 2008 at 9:01 am #
were it not for the fact that hormones defy color lines, no whites would be able to sing or dance; in fact, most of them cannot anyhow.
the best part of genealogy comes when the searcher realizes that it is not just his surname grandfathers who define who he is, but that there are in the sixth or seventh generation back some 32 SURNAMES, most of which he has never heard, and each of them represents the same percentage contribution to who he is and what he looks like.
But be very careful about it all: it is a wise child who knows his own father. A marriage license may be issued, but there were likely no witnesses to the consumation of a marriage, and there is no way to establish exactly who impregnated a woman either before or after her marriage to a man who did not.
Report thisBy jackpine savage, April 17, 2008 at 7:04 am #
Well i’ll be a monkey’s great, great, great, great, great, great, great (you get the picture) nephew…
I’m, personally, quite proud of the amoebas in my family tree. Without their struggle for survival, what would i be?
An HS science teacher used to tell us that we are all descended from the the strongest, the fastest, the smartest, and the sexiest. It seems hard to believe, i know, but i suppose that it’s true. Somewhere in your family tree is one sexy chimpanzee.
Report this