LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.  
November 21, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Intelligentsia Against Intelligence

The Afghanistan Speech Obama Should Give (but Won't)

Throw the Money Changers Out of the Temple

Lipstick on a Rogue

Battlefield in the War of Ideas

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Enough G-2 Talk Already
Despite Subsidies, Class Sizes Rise in California Schools

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
 * NEW! * Freedom’s Fight: Part II

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Reports

Where Do We Go From Here?

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Apr 2, 2008

By Amy Goodman

  It has been 40 years since Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated in Memphis, Tenn., while standing on the balcony outside his room at the Lorraine Motel. King was there to support striking sanitation workers, African-American men who endured horrible working conditions for poverty wages. While King’s staff was opposed to him going, as they were scrambling to organize King’s new initiative, the Poor People’s Campaign, King himself knew that the sanitation workers were at the front lines of fighting poverty.

  I went to Memphis on Dr. King’s birthday. There I interviewed Taylor Rogers, one of the striking sanitation workers who marched with King. He told me:

  “Back in 1968, 1,300 sanitation workers—we were tired of being mistreated, overworked and underpaid. We decided that we were just going to stand up and be men and do something about our condition. And that’s what we did. We stood up, and we told [Mayor] Henry Loeb in the city of Memphis that ‘I am a man.’ ”

  While he was organizing against poverty, King also came out forcefully against the Vietnam War, alienating his erstwhile ally, President Lyndon Johnson. Exactly one year before his assassination, on April 4, 1967, King gave his “Beyond Vietnam” speech at Riverside Church in New York City. He said: “A few years ago, there was a shining moment in that struggle. It seemed as if there was a real promise of hope for the poor, both black and white, through the poverty program. There were experiments, hopes, new beginnings. Then came the buildup in Vietnam, and I watched this program broken and eviscerated as if it were some idle political plaything of a society gone mad on war. And I knew that America would never invest the necessary funds or energies in rehabilitation of its poor so long as adventures like Vietnam continued to draw men and skills and money like some demonic, destructive suction tube. So I was increasingly compelled to see the war as an enemy of the poor and to attack it as such.”

  He went on, “I could never again raise my voice against the violence of the oppressed in the ghettos without having first spoken clearly to the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today: my own government.”

Advertisement

  Time magazine called the speech “demagogic slander that sounded like a script for Radio Hanoi.” The Washington Post declared that King had “diminished his usefulness to his cause, his country, his people.”

  King made an essential link between poverty at home and war-making abroad. The connection, sadly, is as relevant today as it was the last year of King’s life. A new report from the Institute for Policy Studies, “40 Years Later: The Unrealized American Dream,” lays out key elements of the inequality that African-Americans experience in the United States around education, employment and wealth accumulation.

  On education, the IPS report states that African-American college graduation rates will not be on par with white graduation rates for another 80 years. The income gap between blacks and whites will not disappear for more than 500 years at current rates. More than one-third of African-Americans earn less than $20,000 annually, before taxes.

  African-Americans are also far behind in the accumulation of wealth. Add to all this higher incarceration, less access to health insurance and shorter life expectancy. King’s Poor People’s Campaign went beyond race, as he reached out to poor whites in places like Appalachia. Today, one in five residents of West Virginia is on food stamps, as is one in 10 Ohioans, and, according Jim Weill, president of the Food Research and Action Center, one in three children in Oklahoma has been on food stamps at some point in the past year. It is clear that Dr. King’s goal of bringing people “to the promised land” is still far off.

  Amy Goodman is the host of “Democracy Now!,” a daily international TV/radio news hour airing on 650 stations in North America.

  © 2008 Amy Goodman

  Distributed by King Features Syndicate


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By jesus jefferson, April 10, 2008 at 10:11 pm #

10 April 2008

Yes, it is true that even in a world without religion “racism”- that is, discrimination, segregation and oppression, a belief by some group that they are superior to others, especially if the “other” is physically different, may indeed still exist. I do not deny this, or claim otherwise. If, however, one reflects deeply and honestly as to what is the most common source of these acts and feelings of superiority, of being right, of being entitled to power, and of being “chosen” and divinely protected one finds superstition and religion.

Is it not true that a cult or culture, a society or person with complete conviction and faith in dogma and doctrine enforced by orthodoxy and creed is always at the core of arrogance and aggression? Do we not pray for our soldiers to be victorious, to kill as many of the “other” as possible and come home safe? Is it not the responsibility of every Christian, every Musilm, every member of every religion to first protect the righteousness of their God; then to protect His real estate and treasure no matter the human cost? Is it not the true and ultimate test of faith to willingly give up one’s very life in the cause of their God?

Simply put, “race” originally designated geographic and family or tribal difference. Now race means colored, usually dark-skinned, primarily African but also includes all native peoples that are not of European descent.

It is common knowledge that slavery and prostitution have existed since savage humans stepped on the barely visible trail that soon became the path, then the road, and finally the freeway of civilization. But did you know that the United States of America is the only empire in history to create and maintain a slave system that was exclusively “racial.” That by limiting perpetual servitude to Africans and their descendants, our nation established that blacks would forever be at the bottom of the social hierarchy.

Two things one should always keep in mind. First, except for rare cases of Albinism, their are no “white” people; human skin tone and color falls somewhere on a continuum of brown, from pale beige to blue-black. Second, on this planet there is only one race of people-the Human Race. Racism is the egotism of faith and the acts of racism are expressions of animalism, of the more pious and powerful inficting their will, their avarice and self-righteousness upon those who are weaker or different.
visit http://shiftofpower.blogspot.com

Report this

By Tracee, April 9, 2008 at 12:28 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

I do strongly agree with what you wrote.  It is not an Race, but an issue with Religion.

Report this

By Jonathon, April 8, 2008 at 10:32 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

I don’t know if I can buy the idea that religion is the absolute cradle of the idea of race inferiority.  Imagine a world without religion.  Would racism still exist?  Yes because people who have the most power have a natural tendency to think they’re superior to those who do not. 

It’ possible that Chrisitianity may be used by few orginizations to promote the idea of race superiority, afterall God and Jesus seem to be portrayed as white people in a most Christian art.  It’s interesting to note that in many African Churches and families Jesus is portrayed as being black though.

In conclusion like Dr. MLK believed from what i have learned recently…the real issue is not religion, or race, but of the disgusting gap between the lower class and the rich.

Report this

By jesus jefferson, April 8, 2008 at 5:38 pm #

Though I have great respect and a deep sense of gratitude for Martin Luther King, Jr.; and even though his intentions and integrity are truly admirable, any movement constructed upon a foundation anchored on the shifting sands of fraud must, of necessity fail. It is the insidious influence of Theology, of Religion, of Christianity that underlies Racism, Poverty, Oppression, Stratification,Class Division, Segregation, and more.

In 1872 the most well known and powerful orator in modern Western history, advocate of free thought, human progress and happiness, the Great Agnostic, Robert Green Ingersoll lectured on “The Gods.” He states that “those who love God most are apt to love men least….Philosophy has not the egotism of faith…it is better to love men than to fear God…there can be but little liberty on earth while men worship a tyrant in heaven.”

This is my point. Racism, unequal distribution of wealth, minority faction rule, injustice they are the symptoms not the actual problem. In other words, it is a matter of focus. Until we eliminate and strictly prohibit legislation originating in Christian orthodoxy, that is to say, until we truly and without exception separate creed and dogma from the action and function of government we will continue this circle and cycle of viscissitudes until our decline is complete. We must turn our attention and energy, our hope and compassion from the unknown, the unprovable, from speculation, prayer and faith-from heaven, and devote our intellect and undivided attention to this world and to living human beings.

We need a new philosophy, system and process upon which to base the creation of a new government, to carry out the intent of our United States Constitution and the legacy of our Declaration of Independence. I believe that political philosophy is Humanistic Equalism: Philosophy for Ethical Government. If you wish to learn more and make a comment visit http://shiftofpower.blogspot.com/ 

Race, as we understand it, is a political construct that was created by the empires of Colonialism to reinforce the status quo power and justify subjugation and enslavement of dark skinned peoples, primarily Africans. By the end of the 18th century Christian orthodoxy employed scripture to attach inferior, even demonic status to people of color. In the 19th century “science” worked diligently to verify scripture, and by the beginning of the 20th century it was generally accepted that science had proven, and God’s word seconded the notion, that dark skinned peoples, especially Africans, were an inferior species of humans, a different order of being, if you will.

The issue is not Race it is Religion.

Report this

By geronimo, April 6, 2008 at 11:43 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Where do we go from here?  Towards peace on earth and goodwill to all living beings, that’s where.  How we going to get there?  We elect a president who’ll end the Iraq War, negotiate with Iran plus turning things around here at home, that’s how.  And then what sort of world?  It’l be up to us.

Report this

By Bill Blackolive, April 6, 2008 at 1:04 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Amy, most US citizens wallow in ignorance. Ours is the most indoctrinated nation - brainwash, not fear like in dictatorships, N. Korea (who know their relatives in S. Korea) etc. So what to do but shock this twisted populace.  A start is getting into corporate television that there is the 9/11 coverup.  That corporate news has not said there were 3 not 2 buildings sank as in demolition, the third not hit by puny airplane, these the only steel beamed buildings in history to fall from fire. You fear losing your gains, I am saying you are well ahead in your gains.  Notice your allies ganging up at patriotsquestion9/11.  A thousand prominent voices are too many to kill already.

Report this

By seancito, April 6, 2008 at 10:33 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

If Dr. King were alive today, he would be slandered for telling the truth about Iraq just as Rev. Wright is for telling the truth about America.

Report this

By laura tattoo, April 6, 2008 at 10:30 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

not to steal thunder from amy’s excellent article, but i would like to share my new piece on the king anniversary with like-minded people. it’s on gather.com and it’s called “Martin Luther King: Poverty and Militarism”. http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.jsp?articleId=281474977301506

please stop by if you would like.  ~laura in astoria, oregon

Report this

By Linda, April 4, 2008 at 10:57 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

1967 is the date of the speech so the sentence is correct. Easily misread but it is technically correct.

Report this

By david Fischer, April 3, 2008 at 5:59 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

While he was organizing against poverty, King also came out forcefully against the Vietnam War, alienating his erstwhile ally, President Lyndon Johnson. Exactly one year before his assassination, on April 4, 1967, King gave his “Beyond Vietnam” speech at Riverside Church in New York City.

No—that is April 4, 1968.

Report this

By Carolyn, April 3, 2008 at 3:22 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Even without a war, the Bush administration never intended to do anything for the poor. Especially the African American poor, which it considers overcompensated already. Look what they didn’t do in New Orleans. Look what they haven’t done for the hundreds of thousands of people of color in prison who would be out by now if they were white. Look what they haven’t done for poor students who want to go to college.

Tragic as the Vietnam war was, Lyndon Johnson cared about the poor and about civil rights. George W. Bush went to war willfully and deliberately. He makes fun of the weak, and he has packed the Supreme Court with those who will support his unConstitutional views. I have no idea what Martin Luther King, Jr., might do about this administration—King would probably be in jail for a long term. Or maybe Ann Coulter and Bill O’Reilly would mock his views to the point that people wrote him off.

We’ve come a long way since 1968—backwards.

Report this

By Self Wise, April 3, 2008 at 1:00 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

There is a great need for the people to transcend past the perceptions and notions that are often prescribed by the media to efforts of protest or activism.  Activism and namely the face of it in the form of protest/demonstration has clasiccaly been coupled by mainstream media with misguidance or non-intelligence in one form or another. 

I feel very strongly that activism towards any commen sense cause we have going on, wether it be the climate change/ fossil fuel/ big oil crisis, the unending war on a largely imaginary security threat, or corruption of representative government; it all has to be redefined with sharp clear intelligence that exhudes superior thought and rationale and commen sense. 

In reading “The Conscience of a Liberal” I was amazed at how the new conservatives, I think when Reagan was first appearing on the political map, were able to place together the appearance of academic superiority on issues of economics and whatever else fit the self serving needs of their machine.  And at their disposal to define themselves and their enemies was the mainstream media with the directive of having balanced coverage, which we all know means some really intelligent sounding slick lies with a little bit of filtered allowable truth.

So with that said I feel strongly that we have to take into context a mission to not allow the mainstream media to define in the conscience of americans what it means to be active for a cause or seemingly “unpoplular” cause. 

We have to put in the minds of the people that activism is something coupled with intelligence and born out of intelligence and also patriotism as well.  Then the people will begin to again feel more comfortable thinking for themselves and forming their own mental soveriegnty and inelligent opinion.

Report this

By HQX, April 2, 2008 at 9:03 pm #

Amy, you have reported on a truth that many do not want to hear.  That blacks do not have an advantage being black ala Ms. Ferraro.  Blacks endure a burden living in a society poisoned by slavery.  Every American institiution and tradition is affected with blacks getting the brunt of it. 

What’s surprising is not how bad things remain but how far some like Tiger Woods and Barrack Obama have gone.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.