LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.Best Political Blog Winner, 2007 Webby Awards, People's Voice and Jury.   Maggie Award Winning Truthdig Book Reviews
 
May 9, 2008
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Reports
 * NEW! * A Slap in the Face
The Super Problem

Arts & Culture

Digs
Inside the Data Mine

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Reports

McCain’s Age Is No Joke

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Mar 26, 2008

By Ellen Goodman

BOSTON—It was probably not wise for the 64-year-old Brit Hume to describe the 71-year-old John McCain as having a “senior moment.” A blip would have been better. Or a gaffe. Or even a dent in the candidate’s “experience” armor.

But when the traveling senator confused Shiites and Sunnis, when he conflated al-Qaida with all extremists, the “senior moment” phrase uttered by the Fox newsman got velcroed to the story of The Man Who Would Be the Oldest President in American History.

Age? Ageism? Or realism? We’ve been holding a heated conversation about race and gender all season. But age has been relegated to a late-night laugh line by the likes of David Letterman, 60, who described McCain as “the kind of guy who picks up his TV remote when the phone rings.”

The candidate, no slouch in the self-deprecation business, refers to himself as “old as dirt,” although he travels with his 96-year-old mother as a genetic ambassador. And when a New Hampshire high schooler asked McCain whether he might die in office or get Alzheimer’s, he answered, “Thank you for the question, you little jerk.”

Nevertheless, it’s worth assessing this senior’s moment in politics. The polls suggest that Americans are more reluctant to vote for a 70-year-old than for an African-American or a woman. Before you attribute this to prejudice, remember that only 24 percent of Americans under 35 think McCain is too old while 40 percent of those over 65 believe it. Do they know something we should know about a man who would be 72 on Inauguration Day and 80 at the end of two terms?

The cheery cliché of the moment is that 70 is the new 60. In fact, mental fitness has increased along with physical fitness. But at the same time, a new study shows that one out of every three Americans over 70 has some cognitive decline.

I’m willing to bet that McCain is in the lucky two-thirds of this population. And senior moments are not just for seniors. Did Hillary have a middle-aged moment about the sniper attack in Bosnia that never was? Did Barack have a junior moment when he wrote about reading a Life magazine article on a man who tried to lighten his black skin? An article that never ran.

But we have grown to expect a thorough health report on candidates. We knew about John Kerry’s prostate cancer and Joe Biden’s brain aneurysms. We know about McCain’s war injuries and his melanoma, his cholesterol and his allergies. We expect full assessments from every doctor except, well, neurologists. If airline pilots, some judges and people in some other occupations are subject to cognitive tests, why not presidential candidates?

The subject is as uncomfortable as talking to an aging parent about giving up the car keys. Even the feelings among the experts on the elderly are mixed. On one hand, Laura Carstensen, who heads Stanford’s Center on Longevity, offers the good news that as people get older, their knowledge generally increases, as does their ability to regulate emotions. Yet as a voter, she says, “I see better reason to know about someone’s cognitive health than medical health.”

Robert Butler, the man who coined the word ageism, says we should think about individual function, not age. But he adds, “We do want to be sensible when entrusting the leadership of our country that they’re mentally as well as physically healthy.”

Even the author of that study on the high rate of cognitive impairment talks about a “gray area.” Duke University’s Brenda Plassman warns that we can diagnose cancer or diabetes with great certainty, but “there’s no real biomarker for cognitive decline.” Nevertheless, isn’t there information that citizens want to have as politicians get their senior moment in the sun? At 60? 70? 80?

I can name many wise elder statesmen, from Winston Churchill, prime minister at 80, to Nelson Mandela, who retired at 81. Yet my memory is still good enough to conjure up Ronald Reagan, whose Alzheimer’s disease may well have begun while he was in office.

Information won’t always make decisions easier. How would we balance the incline of wisdom against the decline of, say, memory? How do we test stress? And if we ask for cognitive tests, what’s next? Genetic tests? But despite these limits, such information matters. More than a presidential cholesterol test.

I sincerely hope that 70 will be the new 50 before I get there. But for the moment, my favorite line belongs to former Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meier. “Being 70 is not a sin,” said this septuagenarian. “It’s not a joke either.”

Ellen Goodman’s e-mail address is ellengoodman(at)globe.com.

© 2008, Washington Post Writers Group

Email Newsletter

Get truth delivered to your inbox every week.

Previous item: Body of War

Next item: Nixon’s Heir

Jump to Comments

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments: 35 Published. Add Yours?

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By Myronh, March 31 at 1:53 pm #
(21 comments total)

I am 73. I am still active (mentally) as a part-time technical consultant. Am I qualified to be President of the USA? The facts are that the mind may still be fit, but the body and resultant ambition is becoming dormant; just like the plants in the fall of their life. I don’t care what party the candidate represents; I won’t vote for anyone over 65 to be in charge of anything that influences what happens to me and my family (wife,children, grand-children, great-grand-children).

Only an idiot would place their destiny in the hands of McCain.

Reply to this | Report this

By Purple Girl, March 30 at 10:56 am #
(193 comments total)

Not his Age it's his health- Physical &

I know plenty of very healthy vibrant 70’s+, It is not a question of Age- it is a Question of Fitness. John Shows clear signs of a deterioration of his Cognitive abilities- mini Strokes, or Alzheimers like Ronny had long before he left office.
Physically he look like he’s ahd some Phyical therapy sessions- but weakness esp in his upper extremities is apparent. Tath are he’s wearing a brace of some sort. hell they hide Roosevelts infirmity- 60+ yrs later, they have new & improved Devices t increase Mobility following cerebral ‘accidents’
mac is nO ttoo Old- He’s Just Unfit for Duty any longer. retire and Enjoy some Personal Leave time, at the very least take care of yourself, we’ll be fine, We’ve managed with out your services before.But we do Thank You for what you have given US all these Years. Heal thyself

Reply to this | Report this

By ocjim, March 29 at 8:10 pm #
(353 comments total)

Confused, senior moments, ignorant, or dishonest

McCain saying that Iran is training al Qaeda even after being corrected and getting the factions in Iraq wrong would make you guess ignorant concerning the factions and either dishonest (like Bush) or confused regarding the al Qaeda statements. Anyway you look at it doesn’t bode well, to be saddled with another incompetent / lying / warlike president, whatever the reason.

Reply to this | Report this

By dihey, March 29 at 6:14 pm #
(42 comments total)

Venice

Most of Venice’s great Doges were elected when they were near 80 or older than 80. That Republic knew what it was doing.

Reply to this | Report this

By Thomas Billis, March 29 at 6:31 am #
(210 comments total)

Too stupid to steal enough

People in sensitive positions have mandatory retiring ages.Pilots and others.The rule should be if you have not stolen enough to retire by 70 you should be forced to retire because you are probably too stupid anyway.

Reply to this | Report this

By Nat Segaloff, March 28 at 8:40 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Here’s the scenario: McCain picks Huckabee as his VP to pacify the Fundies and create a broad-based Republican ticket. He lasts a respectable year in office. He resigns for health reasons. Huckabee becomes President. What does it matter how old John McCain is as long as the Chairmen of the Boards of General Motors, GE, Boeing, and the people who REALLY run the country are all lucid?

Reply to this | Report this

By How Insane Is John McCain?, March 28 at 7:13 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Well, his age kind if is a joke too.

Reply to this | Report this

By Blackspeare, March 28 at 3:07 pm #
(175 comments total)

It is known that US presidents that become incapacitated during their terms are succeeded by their handlers if they do not die outright.  If they do die then, of course the VP takes over.  That is why McCain’s VP choice will be extremely important.  But this is all moot since McCain will eventually lose to any of the Democrats though I suspect that it may be a closer race than expected.

Reply to this | Report this

By Jojo from Tucson, March 28 at 12:46 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

In order for McCain to be able to answer the phone at 3 AM, there should have a phone in the bathroom

Reply to this | Report this

By thomas campbell, March 28 at 4:25 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

geezer

McCain is too darn old.  Have people ever checked out his left cheek?  It not only sticks out abnormally, but it looks lumpy too.  Perhaps it is nothing but I think all these candidates should be checked out thoroughly both physically and mentally.  But could we expect to hear an unbiased report from their doctors that we could believe?

Reply to this | Report this

By Dr. Knowitall, PhD, PhD, March 27 at 1:36 pm #
(545 comments total)

I will appear on TD a couple years after the election to apologize to all of you repub/demo lovers who see our country’s salvation in one of the three candidates. 

They’re all to one degree or another responsible for the pitiful condition of our country, no matter how they try to distance themselves from that fact.

Conversely, I will be delighted to give you all a “See, I told you so.” I would love to be able to do the former, however, the patriot that I am.

For starters, no matter what dems say, the occupation of Iraq will continue for years to come and justified/rationalized by a dem prez.  You will have been hoodwinked. Oil=war&occupation;

Reply to this | Report this

By weather, March 27 at 12:54 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Its not age nor infirmities

its character and substance.

Despite his profound handicaps, Stephen Hawking could command the World’s stage w/respect.

If McCain just finished a triathletic event he still could’nt compete, match or matter to the sum and substance found in Hawking’s little finger, let alone garner the kind of moxey required to even feebly repair America’s past 15yrs. of toxic and deliberate dysfunction.

It would serve Obama well to invite Al Gore onto his team, we, he need all the help we can get.

Reply to this | Hide 1 reply | Report this

By cyrena, March 27 at 5:47 pm #
(4023 comments total)

Re: Its not age nor infirmities

I agree that it would be an excellent idea for Obama to invite, (maybe PLEDE?) with Al Gore to join our team.

Reply to this | Report this

By jwh186, March 27 at 12:47 pm #
(1 comments total)

Thank you for raising this issue.  There is much talk about McCain’s recent “gaffes” and whether they are indicative of his being far less knowledgeable about foreign affairs and national security than one would have you believe or attempts to deceive the American people to lay the foundation for war with Iran.  Given his age and what I can only describe as a simple-mindedness; inability to see and understand nuances or complexity, incoherency in his speeches and positions, as well as a lack of consistency from one press op to the next, I don’t understand why no one seems willing to think it is due to failing cognitive abilities.  Why is it so inconceivable that the elected official population suffers, in the same proportion as the rest of the population, from the conditions and diseases that impair cognitive functioning as we age? 

Given the admissions of love and respect for McCain among journalists and their obvious protectiveness of him chances are we haven’t even seen the unvarnished McCain.  Do we really want Reagan redux?

Reply to this | Report this

By MaryinNC, March 27 at 12:47 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Presidency Aging

Chuck Norris said about McCain and I paraphrase… If one ages in presidency years which is one calendar year egual six presidency years, then McCain at 71 will be 95 or 96 after 4 years in office.  One only need to look at GWB to see how the president ages while in office.  Heaven help us all if McCain wins.

Reply to this | Report this

By JG, March 27 at 11:41 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Give me a break-I do not care what age McCain is today, tomorrow and CERTAINLY NOT AFTER TWO TERMS!  His age is not the issue; the issue is the downward spiral he would continue for this country in every way possible. I am a Yellow Dog Democrat and will vote for Elmer Fudd if he is the Democratic nominee-A.B.A.R. = Anybody But A Republican!

Reply to this | Report this

By ender, March 27 at 11:36 am #
(128 comments total)

The Alzheimers care tips add on the page with this report?  Concidence?  I don’t think so.

Seriously, the few minutes I watched of McCain’s interminally long but terminally boring speach make me think he may be the new Reagan!  Complete with early stage Alzheimers!

Reply to this | Report this

By Marshall K, March 27 at 10:12 am #
(36 comments total)

Those Whacky Clintons

They have lost, won’t admit it, are being enabled by the press, and want to take everyone down with them.  I guess Mr. Obama has his work cut out for him.  I’m beginning to think that the worst is already being thrown at him.  The Rove machine can’t be any slimier, so once he makes it through the crap the Clintons throw at him, the rest will seem relatively easy.  Maybe he should just ignore them and begin his campaign against McCain now.

Reply to this | Hide 1 reply | Report this

By cyrena, March 27 at 11:35 am #
(4023 comments total)

Re: Those Whacky Clintons

Marshall K

My sentiments exactly!!

“...I’m beginning to think that the worst is already being thrown at him.  The Rove machine can’t be any slimier, so once he makes it through the crap the Clintons throw at him, the rest will seem relatively easy..”

Yes, this is the very same thing I’d been thinking in recent weeks. If Obama can make it through the Rovian-Clinton destruction machine, he’ll be back on level ground with the wind at his back by the time he gets to McCain.

But, I don’t think he should ingore them yet. One should never turn their backs on a snake, or any desperately caged animal, even if they’ve caged themselves. (actually, that just makes ‘em that more dangerous).

Nope, as unfair and time/stress consuming as it is, he can’t afford to ignore them.

Reply to this | Report this

By Howard, March 27 at 7:44 am #
(461 comments total)

He's the best candidate going...

Most likely will vote for him; more common sense and Experience than the others.  By far.

Go McCain !!

Reply to this | Hide 3 replies | Report this

By cyrena, March 27 at 11:38 am #
(4023 comments total)

Re: He's the best candidate going...

Aegrus…

You should have KNOWN that McCain would be Howards choice.

Matter of fact, of the 20% of the population that still ‘supports’ Dick Bush, I’d put money on the fact that Howard is one of them.

Need we know more?

Reply to this | Report this

By Aegrus, March 27 at 8:45 am #
(686 comments total)

Re: He's the best candidate going...

Hah!

Common sense? McCain is a man who felt we should have had a nuclear war with Russia and North Korea. He complained about not being restricted by his superiors in Vietnam regarding bombing targets. He’s an aggressor and aggression has little in common with sensibility.

Reply to this | Hide 1 reply | Report this

By Aegrus, March 27 at 8:46 am #
(686 comments total)

Re: Re: He's the best candidate going...

#edit: about being. Lose the not. sorry.

Report this

By dp, March 27 at 7:02 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Funny, we were discussing this just the other day.  That some sort of mental evaluation should be a prereq to a run for such a high public office.  McCain’s age concerns me, but even more so, possible effects from his service in the military.  If a general IQ test was a requirement, maybe we wouldn’t have had the last 7 years of rule by a mentally deficient president.  But I don’t think Bush’s purpose was to actually BE the pres., more the puppet of the neocons.  It was obvious to most people I knew that Bush was really not up to the challenge, so it probably won’t make a difference in McCain’s case either.

Reply to this | Report this

By omop, March 27 at 6:14 am #
(118 comments total)

The issue of age is a joke IF ITS THE DECIDING FACTOR on voting for or against.

To date Sen.McCain has not said or proposed any action that distinguishes him as the “man for the job”. He has repeatedly spent some days in Iraq; paid his respects to Joe Lieberman’s kinfolks in Israel; has informed the citizenry that they should NOT run to the government with the expectation of receiving hand-outs like the Bears on Wall Street.

Given the mess and tragedies proferred by the present administration one would hope that regardless of whose photo is hung in every federal office in 2009 that saner and less special interest lobbies will be listened to by the socalled CinC.

Thus the really primary issue is the intellect rather than the age of the candidate that is not a joke. So far the 4th estate has not seen fit to question the candidates in ways that would educate the voter as to who is worthy of being voted for.

Guess thats why we get to discuss “age” as a joke or no joke.

Reply to this | Report this

By Jim Yell, March 27 at 5:47 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

decline isn't the only thing about age

There is a good possibility that John McCain’s vice president will become president before his term is out either thru being removed from office due to decline, but as likely that he won’t have the time to finish the term.

If he has a good chance of winning the office, we had better hope he choses a genuine moderate running mate.

Reply to this | Report this

By jcbrap, March 27 at 5:35 am #
(6 comments total)

Time to Give it Up

McCain IS as old as dirt and is the LAST thing this country needs.  What we really need in this country is new blood, new leadership!  I can’t think of a worse scenario than a 70+ year old white male being elected president during these fast-changing and difficult times.

Is this the best that Republicans can do? Talk about out-of-touch!  He brings his 90+ YO mother with him wherever he goes too?!  My God, I shudder to think of this guy with his finger on the button.

Here’s some advise for John McCain and his 90+ YO mother.  Go home and retire and let someone else have a chance at screwing up the country.  You’ve done enough already on that front.

Reply to this | Report this

By bozhidar bob balkas, March 27 at 5:34 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

who orders whom in US?

does the prez order merica (and which merica; there’s at least 3?) or does one of mericas order prez? since i’v put the quest’n in either-or structure, it’s not a quest’n but nonsense. now, may i please continue w. the relationship betwn a prez and amers or the 3 mericas? a homeless people may be sorted as, what, tenth merica?
a prez appears as interdependent. but quest’n arises, to what degree he’s independent or independent. it can b easily seen that “independent” and “depended” do not apply since it’s an either-or arrayment and in nature, of which we’r part, such categories seldom exist, if at all. we conclude thus firmly that we’r talking ab. interdependence.
but on which of several mericas is a prez more, or by far more, interdependent? on homeless? working class? or multitude of advisers/speciaists? if by far more interdependent on specialists (which, of course, is not special interest to mccain) then who pays not only them but also politicos w. scripts in their brains and their campaigns for elect’n? it’s up to truthdig to dig up this info. thanx

Reply to this | Report this

By Dr. Knowitall, PhD, PhD, March 27 at 5:25 am #
(545 comments total)

There’s no litmus test I know of that will ferret out one being, simply, an ignorant, misguided, devious, miserable SOB.  But maybe it’d be worth developing.  America’s overloaded with brain power.
How about a prize for some genius who can come up with a test for presidential candidates. 

First question, “Can you read this exam?”
Second question, “Describe, briefly, your realtionship with your parents,” etc. 

“Pilot error” could be code for “lets not go there”
in our investigation of causes of some crashes.

The fact there are a lot of really sharp, socially responsible 70- and 80-year-olds out there might rule out arbitrary age discrimination.  Especially in men when most of the piss and vinegar has leached out and they can begin to think a little more rationally.  Look at Castro, a virtual gentle Noah in his senior years.

Reply to this | Hide 1 reply | Report this

By Expat, March 27 at 5:46 am #
(826 comments total)

Yes, Senator Robert Byrd.......

^ is one of them (a virtual gentle Noah in his senior years) but McCain, certainly, is not one of them at 71.  Age is no guarantee of anything; wisdom is not a matter of longevity.  It may be the result of intelligence and another quality that eludes politicians and my erudition/understanding.  I would suggest it’s a romantic fallacy that age breeds wisdom and mellowness.  That quality is only for those that truly care.

Reply to this | Report this

By Aegrus, March 27 at 4:25 am #
(686 comments total)

We can discuss ageism till the cows come home, it doesn’t mean McCain is qualified to take office right now. Slips of the tongue, drumming the war, admitting he knows nothing about economics, re-establishing ties with religious conservatives, forgetting every stance he took a hard position against and is now for (like the Bush tax cuts, torture and so on). Let’s not discuss McCain’s age, but his qualifications… of which are slim.

Reply to this | Report this

By Expat, March 27 at 2:58 am #
(826 comments total)

If memory serves, old age starts........

^ at 70.  Please don’t give me that PC crap about Ageism; McCain is an old man by any definition and has no business as President, period!  I’m no spring chicken and I want a young one: Under 50; male or female; Christian, Muslim, Buddhist or Atheist; black, white, brown, red or yellow.  Just give us someone competent.

Reply to this | Report this

By cyrena, March 27 at 12:17 am #
(4023 comments total)

Good points, especially for those who’ve yet to experience the cognitive decline of a loved one, or even accept their own.

In reality, while the ‘tests’ may not be as defining as those for physical wellness, there ARE tests for cognitive functions, and they are routinely used by neurologists and geriatric clinicians.

I don’t see how it would be so unreasonable to expect John McCain to undergo such tests. Like Ellen has pointed out, airline pilots undergo these exams in addition to the physical exams. And, not just them. There are many occupations that require this. In California, health care professionals like psychiatrists are required to have their OWN psychiatrist. Makes sense to me.

Would this have saved us from George Bush? (he didn’t just become a socio-path) Probably not, because we still got Cheney. He would have been able to ‘trick’ the tests.

Besides, who knew, (besides a few) that he was going to be the one running the show to begin with?

Reply to this | Hide 2 replies | Report this

By Joe Sixpack, March 27 at 7:36 am #
(258 comments total)

Re: Did you see...

Cyrena - I thought of you last evening when I watched Bush’s War on Frontline. did you happen to see it?

Can you reassure me that what happened to Bush won’t happen to Obama? Bush was an inexperienced leader who put his trust in individuals bent on distorting reality to achieve their personal interests. Because Obama has no executive experience to draw upon, how will he be at say, refereeing a turf fight between DOD and State or worse CIA and DOD?

Any thoughts?

Reply to this | Hide 1 reply | Report this

By Aegrus, March 27 at 8:54 am #
(686 comments total)

Re: Re: Did you see...

Joe, that is an ooooooold argument, which has been beaten down with an ugly stick. In the last fifty years, America has only elected three ‘experienced’ presidents. George Bush Sr. and Richard Nixon are in that list. There is no mandate regarding the kind of experience a person needs to be president. If Hillary has 35 years of experience, Barack has 25.

Quality and Judgment experience is the only quantification. Does Hillary exhibit good judgment? Does John McCain? Both candidates can be answered plainly and equally with “NO.”

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox

Privacy Policy

 
Click here to advertise with Truthdig
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
Robert Scheer's new book offers first-hand insight into the presidential mind
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2008 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.