LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.Best Political Blog Winner, 2007 Webby Awards, People's Voice and Jury.   Maggie Award Winning Truthdig Book Reviews
 
May 17, 2008
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Reports

Arts & Culture

Digs
Inside the Data Mine

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Truthdig Bazaar
Caspian Rain

Caspian Rain

By Gina B. Nahai
$25.00

more items

 
Reports

Is Wright Right About Racism?

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Mar 27, 2008

By David Sirota

Since the 1960s, bigotry has undergone an aesthetic makeover. Today, the most pernicious racists do not wear pointy hoods, scream epithets and anonymously burn crosses from behind masks. They don starched suits, recite sententious bromides and stage political lynchings before television cameras. For proof, behold the mob stalking Barack Obama’s former pastor, Jeremiah Wright.

Wright has long delivered fiery (and occasionally outrageous) sermons, to little fanfare. Now, though, a gang of thugs is inflicting a guilt-by-association blow to Obama by excoriating his spiritual adviser for three specific declarations.

Sean Hannity, Fox News’ own George Wallace, turned a fire hose on Wright for his church’s focus. “[The church] is all about the black community,” Hannity thundered, claiming that means Wright supports “a black-separatist agenda.”

Pat Buchanan billy-clubbed Wright for saying, “God damn America.” The MSNBC commentator, who avoided the draft, implied that Wright, a former Marine, lacks sufficient loyalty to country. Out of context, Wright’s exclamation was admittedly offensive. But remember: It punctuated a speech about segregation. Buchanan, nonetheless, unleashed, deriding “black hustlers” and insisting descendants of those “brought from Africa in slave ships” owe whites a thank you. “Where is the gratitude?” he asked.

Fox’s Charles Krauthammer berated Wright for saying the 9/11 attacks were “chickens coming home to roost.” Krauthammer labeled the pronouncement “vitriolic divisiveness” despite our government acknowledging the concept of “blowback”—or retaliation—that Wright was referencing. The CIA knows that when it supports foreign dictatorships, there can be blowback from radicals. While blowback is often immoral and undeserved, its existence is undisputed. Yet, Krauthammer alleged that Wright takes “satisfaction in the deaths of 3,000 innocents.”

In promoting the Wright “controversy,” most media outlets joined this mob and embraced “colorblind racism,” says Duke University’s Eduardo Bonilla-Silva, author of “Racism Without Racists.”

It is polite pinstriped prejudice shrouding bigotry in feigned outrage against extremism—the operative word being feigned. After all, John McCain solicited the endorsement of John Hagee, the pastor who called the Catholic Church “the Great Whore.” Similarly, according to Mother Jones magazine, Hillary Clinton belongs to the “Fellowship,” a secretive group “dedicated to ‘spiritual war’ on behalf of Christ.” She is also friendly with Billy Graham, the minister caught on tape spewing anti-Semitism. But while Wright’s supposed “extremism” blankets the news, McCain and Clinton’s relationships with real extremists receive scant attention.

Why is it “controversial” for one pastor to address the black community, racism and blowback, but OK for another pastor to slander an entire religion? Why is it news that one candidate knows a sometimes-impolitic clergyman, but not news that his opponent associates with an anti-Semite? Does the double standard prove the dominant culture despises a black man confronting taboos but accepts whites spewing hate? Does the very reaction to Wright show he’s right about racism?

Clinton seems to think so. Her aides have been describing as their political “firewall” the states they believe Obama will lose. That’s campaign-speak for “race wall”—one built with bricks like Pennsylvania and Indiana. These aren’t the near purely white states where racial politics is often muted (and Obama won). They are the slightly diverse states where racial politics simmers and where the black vote is too small to offset a motivated racist vote. This race wall is now being fortified.

ABC News reports that Clinton’s campaign is “pushing the Wright story” ahead of the Pennsylvania and Indiana primaries. The crass tactic is designed to motivate the racist vote by reminding whites of Obama’s connection to the African-American community. Put another way, Clinton’s message has become simply: Obama Is black.

Wright probably expected this brouhaha. He says our government is “controlled by rich white people” and our culture afflicted by racism. Though these statements are also deemed distasteful by the Establishment, they are truisms. You can see their veracity in the collected portraits of white millionaires commonly called the congressional photo directory. Or, just turn on your television and watch the mob continue stoking the Wright “controversy.”

David Sirota is a best-selling author whose newest book, “The Uprising,” will be released in June. He is a fellow at the Campaign for America’s Future and a board member of the Progressive States Network, both nonpartisan organizations. His blog is at www.credoaction.com/sirota.

© 2008 Creators Syndicate Inc.

Email Newsletter

Get truth delivered to your inbox every week.

Previous item: Iraq Exploding as Shiite Fights Shiite

Next item: Guilty by Observation

Jump to Comments

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

Comment Pages: 1 2 »

By cyrena, April 6 at 6:52 pm #
(4164 comments total)

Oh Conservative Yankee,

This made my day!!

“...Even Magic Johnson can’t fuck that many women worldwide and he has a plane!”

I can’t stop laughing.

Now, what about Bill Clinton? Do you think HE could do this?

Reply to this 1 reply not shown on this page. | Report this

By Fadel Abdallah, April 6 at 5:37 pm #
(382 comments total)

Of course, Rev. J. Wright was right about racism all the way. Meanwhile, all the white bigots and racists were wrong all the way.

Rev. Wright was ahead of his time in seeing the truth and talking about it, whereas the racists were far beyond the times in discovering their disease and accepting to be treated. The distance between Rev. Wright and the racists is like the distance between one seeing the present and future through the past and ones still living in the medieval mentality of the distant past without recognizing the progression of times.

In light of this, the racists are the ones that should be under attack, not the warrior fighting racism.

Reply to this 1 reply not shown on this page. | Report this

By bert, April 4 at 3:38 pm #
(686 comments total)

Reply to Conservative Yankee

<<<<<< It is physically impossible for “ALL humans” to be “… >>>>>>>

Well get the book or watch the video and see for yourself. He actually traces, with DNA evidence, how humans left this one tribe and migrated all over the earth. And it did not take that long. It happened faster than nost people believed possible. But he shows how it did.

And being a scientist he knows there is always more to learn and that models keep changing as we get more evidence.

BIO OF WELLS FROM WIKIPEDIA

“Wells did his Ph.D. work under Richard Lewontin, and later did postdoctoral research with Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza and Sir Walter Bodmer. His work, which has helped to establish the critical role played by Central Asia in the peopling of the world, has been published in journals such as Science, American Journal of Human Genetics, and the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

He wrote the book The Journey of Man: A Genetic Odyssey (2002), which explains how genetic data has been used to trace human migrations over the past 50,000 years, when modern humans first migrated outside of Africa. According to Wells, one group took a southern route and populated southern India and southeast Asia, then Australia. The other group, accounting for 90% of the world’s non-African population (some 5 billion people as of late 2006), took a northern route, eventually peopling most of Eurasia (largely displacing the aboriginals in southern India, Sri Lanka and Southeast Asia in the process), North Africa and the Americas. Wells also wrote and presented the PBS/National Geographic documentary of the same name. By analyzing DNA from people in all regions of the world, Wells has concluded that all humans alive today are descended from a single man who lived in Africa around 60,000 - 90,000 years ago, a man also known as Y-chromosomal Adam.[1]

Since 2005, Wells has headed The Genographic Project, undertaken by the National Geographic Society, IBM and the Waitt Family Foundation, which will add to our knowledge of human history by analyzing DNA samples from around the world, thereby creating a picture of how our ancestors populated the planet.”

Reply to this 2 replies not shown on this page. | Report this

By Leefeller, April 4 at 5:14 am #
(1233 comments total)

Blunt truths

Out of context sound bites selected to make the comments contentious and unpatriotic, dost not matter to the bigots for it was spoken by a black man.

Reply to this | Report this

By Conservative Yankee, April 3 at 5:07 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

bert

before jumping on others for historical “errors” it is a good idea to get your own version of “facts” to fit reality.

From Wikipedia

“Peking Man (now sometimes called Beijing Man), also called Sinanthropus pekinensis (currently Homo erectus pekinensis), is an example of Homo erectus. The remains were first discovered in 1923-27 during excavations at Zhoukoudian (Choukoutien) near Beijing (Peking), China. The finds have been dated from roughly 250,000-400,000 years ago”

He is not the first “human”. As you note, most scholars believe the first human was female. and most likely born in Africa.  There are some studies that contend humans emerged in different areas (South America and Australia) about the same time.

So far no link at all has binded the Australian aborigines to any other race. Likewise the Hutu.

The 40,000 60,000 start date for humans is one of many Xtian fairy tales.

Reply to this 4 replies not shown on this page. | Report this

By bert, April 2 at 6:22 pm #
(686 comments total)

Reply to jack

<<<<<< I am very surprised you were unaware of sexual exploitation of female slaves. NAIVE!! >>>>>>

Quote me jack. Cite from one of my posts where I say or I deny this. I have never even duscussed this topic on this or any other blog. (until now)

I was referring only to your wildly insane and historically inaccurate assertion that Strom Thurmond was a founding father. And the woman in question was not a slave.  “At the time of Washington’s birth, her mother worked for Edgefield’s segregated school system, and Thurmond taught and coached white students. “ [Ken Cummins 12/02, The Black Comment]

In the first post you never mentioned Jefferson. You mention his name in your 2nd post or response to me.(And yes, I know about Sally Hemmings. And she was his long term lover.)

The only example you cited for founding fathers in that first post was Thurmon. I hate to tell you {well, not really} he was NOT a founding father.

And here is your actual quote:  “Our founding fathers raped slave women, were racist and white supremacists but we do not think any less of them (i.e. Strom Thurmon)” Posted By jack, March 31 at 8:39 am #145660(Unregistered commenter)

i.e. means ‘for example.’ So you said/wrote that Strom Thurmon was a founding father. He couldn’t have been. He was not even born yet. He was born after the Civil War. Different age in American history.

And here is part of my reply back - “I never knew Strom Thurman was a Founding Father.” I was needling you about your apparent lack of knowledge about U.S. History.I take it you don’t get sarcasm very well either.

And no it neither shocks or surprises me that we are all of mixed blood. I have know that all my life. And I have already dealt with this on a different thread when I talked about geneticist Spencer Wells who wrote the book The Journey of Man (also an excellent PBS special and video) who has proven that all humans alive today are descended from a single man who lived in Africa around 60,000 years ago. The book and the video document his discovery.

So get off your high horse jack and learn your history and learn how to write.

Reply to this 4 replies not shown on this page. | Report this

By jack, April 2 at 4:37 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Wright was actually quoting a passage Ambassador Peck, a white person when he stated that the chickens wer coming home to roost.  SO you can direct your comments at the at Mr. Peck! IF YOU DARE
Listen/ Read the full sermon. Not the edited one created by the powerful white media. IF YOU DARE

Reply to this | Report this

By Bill Blackolive, April 2 at 8:42 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

LATEST ON HOMOSAPIENS

Latest on homosapiens is we are 200,000 years ago born on Earth.  None of this gets taught in the first grade.  The US got going on its spoils of war then entered the southern Americas in racist balderdash.  By world War I we had too much industrial might for Germany or anyone past World War 11.  We have been the most indoctrinated country. Read Henry Miller’s THE AIR CONDITIONED NIGHTMARE. Miller claimed our birds die on this white bread.  Other dictatorships ruled in plain fear, we did brain wash.

Reply to this | Report this

By Lee, April 2 at 7:55 am #
(118 comments total)

WHO'S THE RACIST?

Backers of Barack Obama say he has the best opportunity to create a new sense of national unity and to transcend divisions within this country ...You mean the same Barak Obama who attended an anti-American, racist church for 20 years? ... You mean the same Barak Obama who swore allegiance to the divisive ‘black value system’ for 20 years? ... You mean the same Barak Obama whose chosen mentor/advisor for 20 years is an anti-American, racist, who gave a disgusting, racist like Louis Farrakan a life time achievement award? This is the best person to bring unity to America? WHAT, ARE YOU KIDDING?

Reply to this 1 reply not shown on this page. | Report this

By Leefeller, April 2 at 5:56 am #
(1233 comments total)

Truth is not nice

Have not seen anyone comment on the truths that are U.S. yet, but could have missed them.  Our country has abused many over the years, the Back people may be at the forfront, but I suspect we are forgetting the Native Americans and of course what we did to our own Japanese citizens. 

Bigotry has to do with differences any little differences, now we have the Mexicans to abuse, everyone gets a turn in the barrel. 

Bigots need something to make them selves feel good about their disfunction, why not pick on someone different, there are many easy targets to choose from. Hell, make one up.

Reply to this | Report this

By JimBob, March 31 at 9:05 pm #
(67 comments total)

You’re quite right.  At the same time, many other populations came to America in poverty and subjugation if not slavery yet their whiteness allowed them to assimilate rapidly.  In fact, why was it possible to enslave Africans if not because of the marked extent of their Otherness?  There were other primitive and defenseless white populations on the planet which could have been dragged here in chains, but the lack of an inherent sense of their Otherness would not have allowed Americans of European descent to accept them as slaves. 
My point is that the maintenance of the institutional, habitual, ingrained racism to which you refer is at least partially fueled by something that is built into human DNA.  It is not so much secondary as it is fundamental, with many layers of socialized behavior overlaid upon it. It is never discussed, never admitted to; I propose that if it were, a healthier discussion of the evils that were allowed to happen because of it could take place.

Reply to this 3 replies not shown on this page. | Report this

By Fadel Abdallah, March 31 at 8:08 pm #
(382 comments total)

Lee! Whites are of two types: one type is noble and conscientious,like Tim Wise; and the other type is called white trash, so which type are you?!

Reply to this 1 reply not shown on this page. | Report this

By JimBob, March 31 at 7:07 pm #
(67 comments total)

Posting this again because I believe it...

We’re in denial about the basis for racism which, if perhaps we can own it and face up to the truth of it, will allow all humans, of every color and race, to live together more peacefully.  That truth is that we, like other “pack animals,” are most comfortable when surrounded by those who look, sound and act like us.  We can overcome that basic instinct, just as we can learn not to freak out at 40,000 feet in an airplane or while maneuvering down a crowded freeway with death or serious injury hovering mere inches away from our bumper.  But first we have to acknowledge that, just as we’re more relaxed on the ground or strolling through a park, we are in fact conditioned to want to see ourselves in those around us.  Too many millennia of human development, in which small differences in physiognomy signaled danger from groups with threatening agendas, have passed for us to simply wave away our gut reaction to “the Other” because we’ve arrived at the intellectual conclusion that “all men are created equal.” Obviously, this doesn’t mean we should all clan up into homogeneous groups and build walls to keep out “exotics.” But if we’re going to derive the benefits that accrue to heterogeneity we need to admit that on a reptilian level, it goes against the grain.  Once we do that, we can develop the means to accommodate and mitigate natural reflexes.  But as long as we are in denial about our fundamental nature, as long as we tell ourselves that it’s just plain morally wrong to feel as we do, we won’t find a true and lasting solution to the question of how we can all live together in acceptance and peace.

Reply to this 1 reply not shown on this page. | Report this

By Outraged, March 31 at 6:47 pm #
(869 comments total)

I swear some people are thick as a brick arent they?

Thanks Fadel Abdallah for posting Tim Wise’s article.

Reply to this | Report this

By shanenol, March 31 at 3:41 pm #
(6 comments total)

While I agree with some of the points pastor Wright brings to the forefront I also believe that many of his comments and actions perpetuate the same kind of racism he is so vehmently preaching against. Furthermore, I think Clinton’s tactic to publicize and emphasize Obama’s relationship with Wright is underhanded, but then again that’s politics.

Reply to this 2 replies not shown on this page. | Report this

By Conservative Yankee, March 31 at 11:18 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Reasons

Jerry Wright is black (well sort of) and Jerry Falwell was white (I guess) what is the difference between saying “God brought 9/11 down on us because we embrace values Leviticus (The house of pre-xtian rabbis)warn against” and saying The Muslims inflicted 9/11 on us because we treated them badly. 

One of the reason’s Wright’s sermons do not connect with “white America” is that most white folks do not trace their line back through slaves. Most white folks have not lived in a Ghetto, and it is difficult to tell one white (say a Catholic liberal) from another (say a protestant conservative)

I have lived in a Ghetto, I have listened to priests in a Catholic Church say things much like what Wright said to his followers. In some fashion, it is a message of hope.

here are some phrases I heard while at St. Peter’s on Main South in Worcester”

“The Devil sits with those charlatans in Boston who believe it is right and just to take from those who have almost nothing and give to those who live like royalty.”

“Theft is not wrong when only profit is lost while the hunger of a child is sated.”

“The prisoners in West Boyleston (Worcester House of Correction) have committed no worse acts than has the Governor of this Commonwealth”

“The poor can never be as evil as the rich, for it takes money and power to be so universally cruel while remaining blissfully unaware of the consequences.”

These statements, when taken together, essentially say; “God Damn The Commonwealth”

Reply to this | Report this

By jack, March 31 at 9:11 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Unedited sermons

People should take the time out to listen to the unedited sermons of Wright on youtube.
The media lied to raise their ratings. Obama pacified some of them but refused to disown Wright.
Even Rev. King stated that America was going to hell and that America was the greatest purveyor of violence on the planet.
More people are now realizing that Wright is a brilliant scholar. His sermons are now available at itunes! The founding fathers raped slave women and held white supremacists view , but we are taught to ignore this fact.  The media gave little analysis to Strom Thurmons hypocrisy while they are demonize Wright!

Reply to this | Report this

By jack, March 31 at 8:39 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Wright never encourages hate of anyone.  He is a critic of the US gov’t and uses examples of colonizers throughout history (Ancient Rome, Communist China, Russia etc) and their subsequent downfall due to their refusal to behave in a moral and ethical way.
Our founding fathers raped slave women, were racist and white supremacists but we do not think any less of them (i.e. Strom Thurmon)
Wright never says Blacks are superior to whites.
His topic was God and Gov’t.  His point was Governments who behave in an immoral, cruel way in domestic or foreign policy will fail and instead of us saying God Bless Americs we will be saying that God damned America for killing innocent people for thinking she is supreme (above God)

Reply to this 3 replies not shown on this page. | Report this

By Louise, March 31 at 7:17 am #
(761 comments total)

Rob Adcox:

“… would a true Christian espouse hatred of an entire race of people from a pulpit?”

***

Well duh ... watch them go after those “Islamo” fascists on the boob tube! Complete with backdrop portraying typical “Arab” tooting gun, dressed in red robes and sporting small horns on forehead!

***

“I know he’s arrogant (another unchristian trait), but come on.”

Right ... come on already!

Definition of arrogant:
- Exaggerating or disposed to exaggerate one’s own worth or importance often by an overbearing manner.
- Having excessive pride in ones self.
- Making claims or pretensions to superior importance or rights; overbearingly assuming; insolently proud:

Now if that doesn’t describe most well known Christian Preachifyers, I don’t know what does!

That humility thing can often be found among their “followers” but rarely in the “leader.” Which pretty well insures the guy taking the name of God in vain will continue receiving un-earned respect, un-earned income and un-earned power.

And, in spite of the fact that the “piously” outraged Wright attackers claim to be offended by his alleged racism. The reality is, they are delighted. Kinda takes the spotlight off their own racism, while still allowing them to lustily pursue said racism!

A win-win for the lose-losers.

Reply to this | Report this

By Austin, March 31 at 7:16 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Krauthammer right for once.

(Fox’s Charles Krauthammer berated Wright for saying the 9/11 attacks were “chickens coming home to roost.” Krauthammer labeled the pronouncement “vitriolic divisiveness”)

Krauthammer is right: the statement is divisive because it divides those who want to know the truth--whatever that truth may be--from jingoistic nationalists, who shun unpleasant truths and anyone who speaks them.

Reply to this | Report this

By Leefeller, March 30 at 8:23 pm #
(1233 comments total)

Bigots

Great piece. Sadly the bigots and racists will not read it or want to comprehend the real truths. 

It remains to be seen if Obama is hurt from the bigoted numbers.  Hopefully they are lower in numbers than in the past.  Part of Obamas Hope.

Like Obama, a refreshing piece of reality.

Reply to this | Report this

By Rob Adcox, March 30 at 5:39 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Leave it to a liberal to overcomplicate this issue. First of all, Wright claims to be “Christian”, but would a true Christian espouse hatred of an entire race of people from a pulpit? Of course not. Since God is no respector of persons, why should Wright be? Does he think his business is more important than God’s? I know he’s arrogant (another unchristian trait), but come on. And let’s not forget the real reason Wright condemns we crackers: because he knows that there is an entire industry of race manipulation as pioneered by con artists like Sharpton and Jackson. Wright has ZERO credibility.

Reply to this 2 replies not shown on this page. | Report this

By republicanSScareme, March 30 at 3:32 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

The nut-wing would be wise to hide what Reverend Wright says instead of advertising it. The more people hear what he says, the more they agree with him.

Reply to this 1 reply not shown on this page. | Report this

By Fadel Abdallah, March 30 at 3:27 pm #
(382 comments total)

Here’s Part 6 of Tim Wise’s Article!
====================================
So what can we say about a nation that values lies more than it loves truth? A place where adherence to sincerely believed and internalized fictions allows one to rise to the highest offices in the land, and to earn the respect of millions, while a willingness to challenge those fictions and offer a more accurate counter-narrative earns one nothing but contempt, derision, indeed outright hatred? What we can say is that such a place is signing its own death warrant. What we can say is that such a place is missing the only and last opportunity it may ever have to make things right, to live up to its professed ideals. What we can say is that such a place can never move forward, because we have yet to fully address and come to terms with that which lay behind.
What can we say about a nation where white preachers can lie every week from their pulpits without so much as having to worry that their lies might be noticed by the shiny white faces in their pews, while black preachers who tell one after another essential truth are demonized, not only for the stridency of their tone--which needless to say scares white folks, who have long preferred a style of praise and worship resembling nothing so much as a coma--but for merely calling bullshit on those whose lies are swallowed whole?
And oh yes, I said it: white preachers lie. In fact, they lie with a skill, fluidity, and precision unparalleled in the history of either preaching or lying, both of which histories stretch back a ways and have often overlapped. They lie every Sunday, as they talk about a Savior they have chosen to represent dishonestly as a white man, in every picture to be found of him in their tabernacles, every children’s story book in their Sunday Schools, every Christmas card they’ll send to relatives and friends this December. But to lie about Jesus, about the one they consider God--to bear false witness as to who this man was and what he looked like--is no cause for concern.
Nor is it a problem for these preachers to teach and preach that those who don’t believe as they believe are going to hell. Despite the fact that such a belief casts aspersions upon God that are so profound as to defy belief--after all, they imply that God is so fundamentally evil that he would burn non-believers in a lake of eternal fire--many of the white folks who now condemn Jeremiah Wright welcome that theology of hate. Indeed, back when President Bush was the Governor of Texas, he endorsed this kind of thinking, responding to a question about whether Jews were going to go to hell, by saying that unless one accepted Jesus as one’s personal savior, the Bible made it pretty clear that indeed, hell was where you’d be heading.
So you can curse God in this way--and to imply such hate on God’s part is surely to curse him--and in effect, curse those who aren’t Christians, and no one says anything. That isn’t considered bigoted. That isn’t considered beyond the pale of polite society. One is not disqualified from becoming President in the minds of millions because they go to a church that says that shit every single week, or because they believe it themselves. And millions do believe it, and see nothing wrong with it whatsoever.
So white folks are mad at Jeremiah Wright because he challenges their views about their country. Meanwhile, those same white folks, and their ministers and priests, every week put forth a false image of the God Jeremiah Wright serves, and yet it is whites who feel we have the right to be offended.
Pardon me, but something is wrong here, and whatever it is, is not to be found at Trinity United Church of Christ.

Tim Wise is the author of: White Like Me: Reflections on Race from a Privileged Son (Soft Skull Press, 2005), and Affirmative Action: Racial Preference in Black and White (Routledge: 2005). He can be reached at: timjwise at msn dot com
This essay originally appeared in Lip.

Reply to this 4 replies not shown on this page. | Report this

By Fadel Abdallah, March 30 at 3:24 pm #
(382 comments total)

Here’s Part 5 of Tim Wise’s Article!
====================================
Most white people desire, or perhaps even require the propagation of lies when it comes to our history. Surely we prefer the lies to anything resembling, even remotely, the truth. Our version of history, of our national past, simply cannot allow for the intrusion of fact into a worldview so thoroughly identified with fiction. But that white version of America is not only extraordinarily incomplete, in that it so favors the white experience to the exclusion of others; it is more than that; it is actually a slap in the face to people of color, a re-injury, a reminder that they are essentially irrelevant, their concerns trivial, their lives unworthy of being taken seriously. In that sense, and what few if any white Americans appear capable of grasping at present, is that “Leave it Beaver” and “Father Knows Best,” portray an America so divorced from the reality of the times in which they were produced, as to raise serious questions about the sanity of those who found them so moving, so accurate, so real. These iconographic representations of life in the U.S. are worse than selective, worse than false, they are assaults to the humanity and memory of black people, who were being savagely oppressed even as June Cleaver did housework in heels and laughed about the hilarious hijinks of Beaver and Larry Mondello.
These portraits of America are certifiable evidence of how disconnected white folks were--and to the extent we still love them and view them as representations of the “good old days” to which we wish we could return, still are--from those men and women of color with whom we have long shared a nation. Just two months before “Leave it to Beaver” debuted, proposed civil rights legislation was killed thanks to Strom Thurmond’s 24-hour filibuster speech on the floor of the U.S. Senate. One month prior, Arkansas Governor Orville Faubus called out the National Guard to block black students from entering Little Rock Central High; and nine days before America was introduced to the Cleavers, and the comforting image of national life they represented, those black students were finally allowed to enter, amid the screams of enraged, unhinged, viciously bigoted white people, who saw nothing wrong with calling children niggers in front of cameras. That was America of the 1950s: not the sanitized version into which so many escape thanks to the miracle of syndication, which merely allows white people to relive a lie, year after year after year.
No, it is not the pastor who distorts history; Nick at Nite and your teenager’s textbooks do that. It is not he who casts aspersions upon “this great country” as Barack Obama put it in his public denunciations of him; it is the historic leadership of the nation that has cast aspersions upon it; it is they who have cheapened it, who have made gaudy and vile the promise of American democracy by defiling it with lies. They engage in a patriotism that is pathological in its implications, that asks of those who adhere to it not merely a love of country but the turning of one’s nation into an idol to be worshipped, it not literally, then at least in terms of consequence.
It is they--the flag-lapel-pin wearing leaders of this land--who bring shame to the country with their nonsensical suggestions that we are always noble in warfare, always well-intended, and although we occasionally make mistakes, we are never the ones to blame for anything. Nothing that happens to us has anything to do with us at all. It is always about them. They are evil, crazy, fanatical, hate our freedoms, and are jealous of our prosperity. When individuals prattle on in this manner we diagnose them as narcissistic, as deluded. When nations do it--when our nation does--we celebrate it as though it were the very model of rational and informed citizenship.

Reply to this | Report this

By Fadel Abdallah, March 30 at 3:22 pm #
(382 comments total)

Here’s Part 4 of Tim Wise’s Article!
=======================================
And so we were shocked in 1987, when Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall declined to celebrate the bicentennial of the Constitution, because, as he noted, most of that history had been one of overt racism and injustice, and to his way of thinking, the only history worth celebrating had been that of the past three or four decades.
We were shocked to learn that black people actually believed that a white cop who was a documented racist might frame a black man; and we’re shocked to learn that lots of black folks still perceive the U.S. as a racist nation--we’re literally stunned that people who say they experience discrimination regularly (and who have the social science research to back them up) actually think that those experiences and that data might actually say something about the nation in which they reside. Imagine.
Whites are easily shocked by what we see and hear from Pastor Wright and Trinity Church, because what we see and hear so thoroughly challenges our understanding of who we are as a nation. But black people have never, for the most part, believed in the imagery of the “shining city on a hill,” for they have never had the option of looking at their nation and ignoring the mountain-sized warts still dotting its face when it comes to race. Black people do not, in the main, get misty eyed at the sight of the flag the way white people do--and this is true even for millions of black veterans--for they understand that the nation for whom that flag waves is still not fully committed to their own equality. They have a harder time singing those tunes that white people seem so eager to belt out, like “God Bless America,” for they know that whites sang those words loudly and proudly even as they were enforcing Jim Crow segregation, rioting against blacks who dared move into previously white neighborhoods, throwing rocks at Dr. King and then cheering, as so many did, when they heard the news that he had been assassinated.
Whites refuse to remember (or perhaps have never learned) that which black folks cannot afford to forget. I’ve seen white people stunned to the point of paralysis when they learn the truth about lynchings in this country--when they discover that such events were not just a couple of good old boys with a truck and a rope hauling some black guy out to the tree, hanging him, and letting him swing there. They were never told the truth: that lynchings were often community events, advertised in papers as “Negro Barbecues,” involving hundreds or even thousands of whites, who would join in the fun, eat chicken salad and drink sweet tea, all while the black victims of their depravity were being hung, then shot, then burned, and then having their body parts cut off, to be handed out to onlookers. They are stunned to learn that postcards of the events were traded as souvenirs, and that very few whites, including members of their own families did or said anything to stop it.
Rather than knowing about and confronting the ugliness of our past, whites take steps to excise the less flattering aspects of our history so that we need not be bothered with them. So, in Tulsa, Oklahoma, for example, site of an orgy of violence against the black community in 1921, city officials literally went into the town library and removed all reference to the mass killings in the Greenwood district from the papers with a razor blade--an excising of truth and an assault on memory that would remain unchanged for over seventy years.

Reply to this | Report this

By Fadel Abdallah, March 30 at 3:19 pm #
(382 comments total)

Here’s part 3 of Tim Wise’s Article!
=======================================
So that’s the truth of the matter: Wright made one comment that is highly arguable, but which has also been voiced by white America’s favorite black man, another that was horribly misinterpreted and stripped of all context, and then another that was demonstrably accurate. And for this, he is pilloried and made into a virtual enemy of the state; for this, Barack Obama may lose the support of just enough white folks to cost him the Democratic nomination, and/or the Presidency; all of it, because Jeremiah Wright, unlike most preachers opted for truth. If he had been one of those “prosperity ministers” who says Jesus wants nothing so much as for you to be rich, like Joel Osteen, that would have been fine. Had he been a retread bigot like Falwell was, or Pat Robertson is, he might have been criticized, but he would have remained in good standing and surely not have damaged a Presidential candidate in this way. But unlike Osteen, and Falwell, and Robertson, Jeremiah Wright refused to feed his parishioners lies.
What Jeremiah Wright knows, and told his flock--though make no mistake, they already knew it--is that 9/11 was neither the first, nor worst act of terrorism on American soil. The history of this nation for folks of color, was for generations, nothing less than an intergenerational hate crime, one in which 9/11s were woven into the fabric of everyday life: hundreds of thousands of the enslaved who died from the conditions of their bondage; thousands more who were lynched (as many as 10,000 in the first few years after the Civil War, according to testimony in the Congressional Record at the time); millions of indigenous persons wiped off the face of the Earth. No, to some, the horror of 9/11 was not new. To some it was not on that day that “everything changed.” To some, everything changed four hundred years ago, when that first ship landed at what would become Jamestown. To some, everything changed when their ancestors were forced into the hulls of slave ships at Goree Island and brought to a strange land as chattel. To some, everything changed when they were run out of Northern Mexico, only to watch it become the Southwest United States, thanks to a war of annihilation initiated by the U.S. government. To some, being on the receiving end of terrorism has been a way of life. Until recently it was absolutely normal in fact.
But white folks have a hard time hearing these simple truths. We find it almost impossible to listen to an alternative version of reality. Indeed, what seems to bother white people more than anything, whether in the recent episode, or at any other time, is being confronted with the recognition that black people do not, by and large, see the world like we do; that black people, by and large, do not view America as white people view it. We are, in fact, shocked that this should be so, having come to believe, apparently, that the falsehoods to which we cling like a kidney patient clings to a dialysis machine, are equally shared by our darker-skinned compatriots.
This is what James Baldwin was talking about in his classic 1972 work, No Name in the Street, wherein he noted:
“White children, in the main, and whether they are rich or poor, grow up with a grasp of reality so feeble that they can very accurately be described as deluded--about themselves and the world they live in. White people have managed to get through their entire lifetimes in this euphoric state, but black people have not been so lucky: a black man who sees the world the way John Wayne, for example, sees it would not be an eccentric patriot, but a raving maniac.”

Reply to this | Report this

By Fadel Abdallah, March 30 at 3:16 pm #
(382 comments total)

Here’s part 2 of Tim Wise article!
====================================
He noted that we killed far more people, far more innocent civilians in Hiroshima and Nagasaki than were killed on 9/11 and “never batted an eye.” That this statement is true is inarguable, at least amongst sane people. He is correct on the math, he is correct on the innocence of the dead (neither city was a military target), and he is most definitely correct on the lack of remorse or even self-doubt about the act: sixty-plus years later most Americans still believe those attacks were justified, that they were needed to end the war and “save American lives.”
But not only does such a calculus suggest that American lives are inherently worth more than the lives of Japanese civilians (or, one supposes, Vietnamese, Iraqi or Afghan civilians too), but it also ignores the long-declassified documents, and President Truman’s own war diaries, all of which indicate clearly that Japan had already signaled its desire to end the war, and that we knew they were going to surrender, even without the dropping of atomic weapons. The conclusion to which these truths then attest is simple, both in its basic veracity and it monstrousness: namely, that in those places we committed premeditated and deliberate mass murder, with no justification whatsoever; and yet for saying that I will receive more hate mail, more hostility, more dismissive and contemptuous responses than will those who suggest that no body count is too high when we’re the ones doing the killing. Jeremiah Wright becomes a pariah, because, you see, we much prefer the logic of George Bush the First, who once said that as President he would “never apologize for the United States of America. I don’t care what the facts are.”
And Wright didn’t say blacks should be singing “God Damn America.” He was suggesting that blacks owe little moral allegiance to a nation that has treated so many of them for so long as animals, as persons undeserving of dignity and respect, and which even now locks up hundreds of thousands of non-violent offenders (especially for drug possession), even while whites who do the same crimes (and according to the data, when it comes to drugs, more often in fact), are walking around free. His reference to God in that sermon was more about what God will do to such a nation, than it was about what should or shouldn’t happen. It was a comment derived from, and fully in keeping with, the black prophetic tradition, and although one can surely disagree with the theology (I do, actually, and don’t believe that any God either blesses or condemns nation states for their actions), the statement itself was no call for blacks to turn on America. If anything, it was a demand that America earn the respect of black people, something the evidence and history suggests it has yet to do.
Finally, although one can certainly disagree with Wright about his suggestion that the government created AIDS to get rid of black folks--and I do, for instance--it is worth pointing out that Wright isn’t the only one who has said this. In fact, none other than Bill Cosby (oh yes, that Bill Cosby, the one white folks love because of his recent moral crusade against the black poor) proffered his belief in the very same thing back in the early ‘90s in an interview on CNN, when he said that AIDS may well have been created to get rid of people whom the government deemed “undesirable” including gays and racial minorities.

Reply to this | Report this

By Fadel Abdallah, March 30 at 3:14 pm #
(382 comments total)

This long piece, by Tim Wise, belongs squarely under this thread. Only people with strong minds and a strong attachment to truth will be able to read read all of it. Here’s part 1:
================================
March 18, 2008
Jeremiah Wright, Barack Obama and the Unacceptability of Truth
Of National Lies and Racial America
By TIM WISE

For most white folks, indignation just doesn’t wear well. Once affected or conjured up, it reminds one of a pudgy man, wearing a tie that may well have fit him when he was fifty pounds lighter, but which now cuts off somewhere above his navel and makes him look like an idiot.
Indignation doesn’t work for most whites, because having remained sanguine about, silent during, indeed often supportive of so much injustice over the years in this country--the theft of native land and genocide of indigenous persons, and the enslavement of Africans being only two of the best examples--we are just a bit late to get into the game of moral rectitude. And once we enter it, our efforts at righteousness tend to fail the test of sincerity.
But here we are, in 2008, fuming at the words of Pastor Jeremiah Wright, of Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago--occasionally Barack Obama’s pastor, and the man whom Obama credits with having brought him to Christianity--for merely reminding us of those evils about which we have remained so quiet, so dismissive, so unconcerned. It is not the crime that bothers us, but the remembrance of it, the unwillingness to let it go--these last words being the first ones uttered by most whites it seems whenever anyone, least of all an “angry black man” like Jeremiah Wright, foists upon us the bill of particulars for several centuries of white supremacy.
But our collective indignation, no matter how loudly we announce it, cannot drown out the truth. And as much as white America may not be able to hear it (and as much as politics may require Obama to condemn it) let us be clear, Jeremiah Wright fundamentally told the truth.
Oh I know that for some such a comment will seem shocking. After all, didn’t he say that America “got what it deserved” on 9/11? And didn’t he say that black people should be singing “God Damn America” because of its treatment of the African American community throughout the years?
Well actually, no he didn’t.
Wright said not that the attacks of September 11th were justified, but that they were, in effect, predictable. Deploying the imagery of chickens coming home to roost is not to give thanks for the return of the poultry or to endorse such feathered homecoming as a positive good; rather, it is merely to note two things: first, that what goes around, indeed, comes around--a notion with longstanding theological grounding--and secondly, that the U.S. has indeed engaged in more than enough violence against innocent people to make it just a tad bit hypocritical for us to then evince shock and outrage about an attack on ourselves, as if the latter were unprecedented.

Reply to this | Report this

By Leefeller, March 30 at 10:38 am #
(1233 comments total)

Lincoln's story of two dunks fighting

Abraham Lincolin, a Republican said the difference between the two political parties is very subtle, he equated both parties as two drunks fighting in the street and when the fight was over they had each others coats on.

Interesting thought, forms a picture in the minds eye.

Reply to this 1 reply not shown on this page. | Report this

By bert, March 30 at 7:29 am #
(686 comments total)

Sickness that is U.S.

Reply to Leefeller et al.

Republicans run campaigns as a business with the intent to win.  Democrats run campaigns as a crusade, with the intent to purge the party of the non-believers or right past wrongs or to convert people to Democratic values.

Proof: Since 1891
Republican presidents: McKinley, T Roosevelt, Taft, Harding, Coolidge, Hoover, Eisenhower, Nixon, Reagan, Bush 1, Bush 2

Democratic Presidents: Wilson, F. Roosevelt, Truman, JFK, LBJ, Carter, Clinton

60% Republican VS 40% Democratic

“As Joe in Maine so eloquently wrote on a different thread:

cyrena writes, “Your post has me bragging again, on how smart we all are. I love it when folks know the truth and acknowledge it, no matter how ugly it may be.”

That’s not the attitude of a winner. It stinks like the liberal elitist you are. That very attitude is going to do more to defeat Obama than any 527 group ad showing Obama without his hand over his heart or any 30-second clip of Rev. Wright pleading for God to Damn America. (What makes us think he hasn’t?)

That attitude does far more harm than you realize. Want to know why Obama does poorly with voters that make less than $50,000 a year? Just get a few ‘real people’ in a room and give them your best cyrena rant. Tell THEM how smart you Obamabots are and how they just don’t get it.

It’s the belief in something too big for you to really understand. Give them a 37-minute lecture in your best constitutional law professor language about how we need to come together so as to distract you from the fact that I never answer any tough questions, how I’ve never been tested against a strong republican opponent. See how many of them stand up inspired with hope and ready to vote for change.”

Reply to this 4 replies not shown on this page. | Report this

By Bill Blackolive, March 30 at 7:28 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

I'm with Cyrena

on this one, because organised religion is this idiotic attempt by caged humans to believe Spirit can be organized, like Earth’s Ocean or space or eternity or infinity of dimension.

Reply to this | Report this

By Leefeller, March 30 at 7:10 am #
(1233 comments total)

Simple minds think not

Just a reminder, Wright is not running for president.  If he is given a house for some reason by his church, you feel the crushing need to mention in a white neighborhood, has anything to do with the presidential campaign. Please enlighten me.

Reply to this 4 replies not shown on this page. | Report this

By bert, March 30 at 6:54 am #
(686 comments total)

Reply to: jimmyjam

Re: WHO’S THE RACIST?
“Well and good but he should practice what he preaches,Disavowal of the Pursuit of “Middleclassness.”

No “Disavowal of the Pursuit of “Middleclassness.” in that million dollar home in a classy white neighborhood that his church some how paid for.

Reply to this 1 reply not shown on this page. | Report this

By bert, March 30 at 6:48 am #
(686 comments total)

Reply to jimmyjam

Thank you for talking about Anthony Bradley. I have never mentioned him here at TD, but I have wanted to.

OBTW - wonderful, great even, comeback to Cyrena. I love to hear the soind of hammer meeting head of a nail.

Reply to this | Report this

By AnAmericaninGermany, March 30 at 6:45 am #
(9 comments total)

scared...

Seems to me.. you are ALL scared of whichever person has an opposite opinion or experience than your own.
To classify the “white” or “black” or “gay” or whatever experience as a general path that all people of that group have taken is not only ludicrous, it is self defeting.

Get it together people…

united we stand, divided we fall… and boy… are we divided

Reply to this 1 reply not shown on this page. | Report this

By Fadel Abdallah, March 30 at 6:19 am #
(382 comments total)

Here’s a consciousness white American telling the truth about racism in America! Just a few paragraphs from an article by Tim Wise entitled, “Whites Like Me: Reflections on Race from a Privileged Son.” This article originally appeared in “lip”.
========================================
Of National Lies and Racial America
By TIM WISE

For most white folks, indignation just doesn’t wear well. Once affected or conjured up, it reminds one of a pudgy man, wearing a tie that may well have fit him when he was fifty pounds lighter, but which now cuts off somewhere above his navel and makes him look like an idiot.
Indignation doesn’t work for most whites, because having remained sanguine about, silent during, indeed often supportive of so much injustice over the years in this country--the theft of native land and genocide of indigenous persons, and the enslavement of Africans being only two of the best examples--we are just a bit late to get into the game of moral rectitude. And once we enter it, our efforts at righteousness tend to fail the test of sincerity.
But here we are, in 2008, fuming at the words of Pastor Jeremiah Wright, of Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago--occasionally Barack Obama’s pastor, and the man whom Obama credits with having brought him to Christianity--for merely reminding us of those evils about which we have remained so quiet, so dismissive, so unconcerned. It is not the crime that bothers us, but the remembrance of it, the unwillingness to let it go--these last words being the first ones uttered by most whites it seems whenever anyone, least of all an “angry black man” like Jeremiah Wright, foists upon us the bill of particulars for several centuries of white supremacy.
But our collective indignation, no matter how loudly we announce it, cannot drown out the truth. And as much as white America may not be able to hear it (and as much as politics may require Obama to condemn it) let us be clear, Jeremiah Wright fundamentally told the truth.
Oh I know that for some such a comment will seem shocking. After all, didn’t he say that America “got what it deserved” on 9/11? And didn’t he say that black people should be singing “God Damn America” because of its treatment of the African American community throughout the years?
Well actually, no he didn’t.
Wright said not that the attacks of September 11th were justified, but that they were, in effect, predictable. Deploying the imagery of chickens coming home to roost is not to give thanks for the return of the poultry or to endorse such feathered homecoming as a positive good; rather, it is merely to note two things: first, that what goes around, indeed, comes around--a notion with longstanding theological....

Reply to this 1 reply not shown on this page. | Report this

By Jack, March 30 at 5:49 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

In the USA if you are half -black you are considered Black.  Every African-American has a percentage of European ancestry due the the sexual exploitation of Black women during and after slavery. S0me Blacks have a small percentage of Native- American and European ancestry.  The recent PBS series African -American lives showed this.  The show demonstrated that nearly all Blacks have 15-40 percent European ancestry.  Due to this rule (one drop) there are no white people named Washington or Jefferson. These two presidents had children with their slave women and whites back in those days did not want to be mistaken for one of his Black children which would have open them up to racism, loss of income, rejection , lynchings etc. This tradition of white men impregnating/raping Black women continued till modern times (Strom Thurmon). It is interesting and surprising that he actually kept in touch with her but white men having such superior status would never be questioned by society.

Reply to this 1 reply not shown on this page. | Report this

By omop, March 30 at 5:06 am #
(120 comments total)

The old adage attributed to a native - american is the most oertinent and appropriate way to communicate the point that anyone who has never been judged or considered or treated habitually in a manner reflecting a bias, prejudice or the petultimate state of being a slave or the equivalent a pet of the white race… will never really know what racism is all about.

Reply to this | Report this

By Leefeller, March 29 at 7:59 pm #
(1233 comments total)

Ammo clerks wanted

While you guys are applying for jobs with the military complex, we have Wright running for president, at least according to the Hillary crowd. 

My only hope is the Clintons will run for governor of New York, and promote the spritzer whore houses, with as little class, as as the Clinton’s can muster, well then the red phone could become an icon of prestigious ill-repute.

Reply to this 3 replies not shown on this page. | Report this

By ocjim, March 29 at 7:58 pm #
(356 comments total)

Racism Still Here

Reagan used the resentment against civil rights and affirmative action to paint blacks as welfare queens, etc. Bush II just neglected and ignored all of the poor and vulnerable. The radical right exploits the vestiges still there.

The radical right media has strafed the Obama campaign, including Fox TV News (Noise, according to Keith Olberman) and those of the Rush Limbaugh stripe. Their spurious and racist comments and images are designed to ambush their willing audiences with a fear/resentment-inspired negative image of Obama and his campaign.

Youtube has compiled a sample of the most recent Fox News videos and quotes from commentators like O’Reilly, Hannity, and a number of minion FoxNoiseians, giving real statements and the fear or stereotype.

Examples: 1) The reason he (Obama) is considered such a big deal is because he is a black candidate, obviously using resentment against affirmative action. 2)Half of the kids under five years old are minorities. Black folks having babies without being married.It suggests indiscriminate breeding of Blacks and relates to the underlying engenics issue of spreading inferior genes. 3)Look what they did with the Dome. They turned it into a ghetto. This excuses Katrina neglect of black victims. Blacks seen as a culpable destructive, even criminal element, maybe even deserving. 4)They will get up every day and kill someone and have chicken at KFC. Lawlessness of Blacks and favorite food stereotype. 5)Obama’s middle name is Hussein. He is a Muslim. Association with al Quaeda and extremists. 6)Trinity Church in Chicago is where Obama calls home. Are they worshipping Christ? They are cultish. Involves association with unfamiliar religion, including Islam.

The stereotypes and the fears associated with them have been real in American culture for many years. Many feel that the Republican party has bet its ascendency on utilizing stereotypes, resentment and fear, especially in capturing southern states. Resentment of LBJ’s Great Society and the civil rights movement of the 1960’s gave the new conservative movement a common cause and a rallying cry.

People have become weary with cries of racism, but vestiges have always been there. The adjectives to describe Black people have not changed too much since the 1930s, including lazy, superstitious, ignorant, loud, poor and criminal. Mocking black language is also a favorite demonization method, something already used by Karl Rove in the Wall Street Journal, relating Obama to rap, trash-talk, basketball, and laziness.

Media’s contribution includes television depicting blacks as poor nearly twice as often as the true incidence: actually account for 29 percent of poor but are depicted as poor in excess of 50 percent of cases, and lawlessness is often associated with blacks in cop shows. According to Lawrence Grossman, former president of CBS News and PBS, TV newscasts “disproportionately show African-Americans under arrest, living in slums, on welfare, and in need of help from the community.”

Reply to this 2 replies not shown on this page. | Report this

By jimmyjam, March 29 at 4:55 pm #
(140 comments total)

Patrick Henry

You were wrong on a few counts,3800 yds is a few more than a thousand, anything you need to know about weapons ask, I will be more than happy to fill you in. I unlike you wont even be condescending, But its like you said ,Its obvious you dont know shit about any of this..
Country of Origin USA
Date Of Introduction 1978
Crew 3
Caliber 2.4 in (60 mm)
Weight 46.5 lb (21.1 kg) Conventional Mode
18.0 lb (8.2 kg) Handheld Mode
Range 77 - 3,828 yd (70 - 3,500 m)
Rate of Fire Maximum: 18-30 per minute for 1 to 4 minutes
Sustained: 8-20 rounds per minute, indefinitely

Chinese mortar,TYPE 84 (W84) 82MM MORTAR.  Soviet was more ww2 still a 2700 yd dif.
Calibre: 82mm
Barrel length: 1,400mm
Weight: (combat) 39.7kg
Bipod weight: 15.5kg
Base plate weight: 16kg
Projectile weight: 4.2kg (HE)
Rate of fire: 30 rds/min
Muzzle velocity: 265m/s (standard); 311m/s (extended-range)
Fire range: Min: 120m; Max: 4,660m (standard) or 5,700m (extended-range)
Gun elevation: 45~80 degree
Azimuth: +/-3.5 degree
Crew: 5~7
Ammunition: HE, HE blastings, illuminating, incendiary, smoke

Reply to this 2 replies not shown on this page. | Report this

By Paolo, March 29 at 4:30 pm #
(286 comments total)

Hi Cyrena,

The “Laman” bloke only appears, of course, in the “Book of Mormon.” The story of the “Book of Mormon” is that some Jewish folk at about the time of Isaiah travelled by ship to the New World, taking a route across the Indian Ocean, around Southeast Asia, across the Pacific, to the west coast of South America.

I’m not making this up.

So these nice Jewish folk ended up settling the New World. One leader, named “Nephi” (there’s an authentic Jewish name for you) was an upright, godly fellow. Another leader, “Laman” (there’s a good Jewish name for you) was evil and was turned into the first Native American. I don’t recall exactly what he did to earn this terrible fate.

Anyway, in the end, the “Nephites” all went bad, so God let the “Lamanites” kill them all off. One of the last of the “Nephites” was this bloke named “Mormon” (there’s a good Jewish name for you), who supposedly put the New World scriptures together before they were “revealed” to Joseph Smith. The prophet Joseph Smith was able to read the ancient scriptures, engraved on plates of solid gold, by looking through a magical crystal supplied to him by an angel named “Moroni” (no, not “I Moron”: it’s “Moroni!") The crystal allegedly converted the ancient scriptures to King James style English.

So in the Old World, we had “the mark of Cain.” The Bible says God just put an mark, not further described, on Cain. As you noted, racists later “interpreted” this mark to be dark skin.

In the New World, we had the “mark of Laman,” which was a shade of skin tone lighter than Africans, but a bit darker than Caucasians or Jewish folk. 

I’m not making this up.

[Note to any Mormons reading this. I really try not to sound like I’m making fun of your religion. It’s just hard to tell the story without doing so. But if you want to believe it, I suppose it’s no more irrational than any other religion. I apologize most sincerely.]

Reply to this 4 replies not shown on this page. | Report this

By Louise, March 29 at 2:33 pm #
(761 comments total)

Greg Palast reflects on Easter Suday

God Damn America
Especially Pennsylvania

By Greg Palast
Su