![]() ![]() |
![]() |
| |
|
Is Wright Right About Racism?Posted on Mar 27, 2008By David Sirota Since the 1960s, bigotry has undergone an aesthetic makeover. Today, the most pernicious racists do not wear pointy hoods, scream epithets and anonymously burn crosses from behind masks. They don starched suits, recite sententious bromides and stage political lynchings before television cameras. For proof, behold the mob stalking Barack Obama’s former pastor, Jeremiah Wright. Wright has long delivered fiery (and occasionally outrageous) sermons, to little fanfare. Now, though, a gang of thugs is inflicting a guilt-by-association blow to Obama by excoriating his spiritual adviser for three specific declarations. Sean Hannity, Fox News’ own George Wallace, turned a fire hose on Wright for his church’s focus. “[The church] is all about the black community,” Hannity thundered, claiming that means Wright supports “a black-separatist agenda.” Pat Buchanan billy-clubbed Wright for saying, “God damn America.” The MSNBC commentator, who avoided the draft, implied that Wright, a former Marine, lacks sufficient loyalty to country. Out of context, Wright’s exclamation was admittedly offensive. But remember: It punctuated a speech about segregation. Buchanan, nonetheless, unleashed, deriding “black hustlers” and insisting descendants of those “brought from Africa in slave ships” owe whites a thank you. “Where is the gratitude?” he asked. Fox’s Charles Krauthammer berated Wright for saying the 9/11 attacks were “chickens coming home to roost.” Krauthammer labeled the pronouncement “vitriolic divisiveness” despite our government acknowledging the concept of “blowback”—or retaliation—that Wright was referencing. The CIA knows that when it supports foreign dictatorships, there can be blowback from radicals. While blowback is often immoral and undeserved, its existence is undisputed. Yet, Krauthammer alleged that Wright takes “satisfaction in the deaths of 3,000 innocents.” In promoting the Wright “controversy,” most media outlets joined this mob and embraced “colorblind racism,” says Duke University’s Eduardo Bonilla-Silva, author of “Racism Without Racists.” It is polite pinstriped prejudice shrouding bigotry in feigned outrage against extremism—the operative word being feigned. After all, John McCain solicited the endorsement of John Hagee, the pastor who called the Catholic Church “the Great Whore.” Similarly, according to Mother Jones magazine, Hillary Clinton belongs to the “Fellowship,” a secretive group “dedicated to ‘spiritual war’ on behalf of Christ.” She is also friendly with Billy Graham, the minister caught on tape spewing anti-Semitism. But while Wright’s supposed “extremism” blankets the news, McCain and Clinton’s relationships with real extremists receive scant attention. Why is it “controversial” for one pastor to address the black community, racism and blowback, but OK for another pastor to slander an entire religion? Why is it news that one candidate knows a sometimes-impolitic clergyman, but not news that his opponent associates with an anti-Semite? Does the double standard prove the dominant culture despises a black man confronting taboos but accepts whites spewing hate? Does the very reaction to Wright show he’s right about racism? Clinton seems to think so. Her aides have been describing as their political “firewall” the states they believe Obama will lose. That’s campaign-speak for “race wall”—one built with bricks like Pennsylvania and Indiana. These aren’t the near purely white states where racial politics is often muted (and Obama won). They are the slightly diverse states where racial politics simmers and where the black vote is too small to offset a motivated racist vote. This race wall is now being fortified. ABC News reports that Clinton’s campaign is “pushing the Wright story” ahead of the Pennsylvania and Indiana primaries. The crass tactic is designed to motivate the racist vote by reminding whites of Obama’s connection to the African-American community. Put another way, Clinton’s message has become simply: Obama Is black.
Wright probably expected this brouhaha. He says our government is “controlled by rich white people” and our culture afflicted by racism. Though these statements are also deemed distasteful by the Establishment, they are truisms. You can see their veracity in the collected portraits of white millionaires commonly called the congressional photo directory. Or, just turn on your television and watch the mob continue stoking the Wright “controversy.”
© 2008 Creators Syndicate Inc. Previous item: Iraq Exploding as Shiite Fights Shiite Next item: Guilty by Observation Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.
Comment Pages:
1
»
By Conservative Yankee, April 3 at 5:07 am # bert before jumping on others for historical “errors” it is a good idea to get your own version of “facts” to fit reality. From Wikipedia “Peking Man (now sometimes called Beijing Man), also called Sinanthropus pekinensis (currently Homo erectus pekinensis), is an example of Homo erectus. The remains were first discovered in 1923-27 during excavations at Zhoukoudian (Choukoutien) near Beijing (Peking), China. The finds have been dated from roughly 250,000-400,000 years ago” He is not the first “human”. As you note, most scholars believe the first human was female. and most likely born in Africa. There are some studies that contend humans emerged in different areas (South America and Australia) about the same time. So far no link at all has binded the Australian aborigines to any other race. Likewise the Hutu. The 40,000 60,000 start date for humans is one of many Xtian fairy tales.
By jack, April 2 at 4:37 pm # Wright was actually quoting a passage Ambassador Peck, a white person when he stated that the chickens wer coming home to roost. SO you can direct your comments at the at Mr. Peck! IF YOU DARE
By Bill Blackolive, April 2 at 8:42 am # LATEST ON HOMOSAPIENSLatest on homosapiens is we are 200,000 years ago born on Earth. None of this gets taught in the first grade. The US got going on its spoils of war then entered the southern Americas in racist balderdash. By world War I we had too much industrial might for Germany or anyone past World War 11. We have been the most indoctrinated country. Read Henry Miller’s THE AIR CONDITIONED NIGHTMARE. Miller claimed our birds die on this white bread. Other dictatorships ruled in plain fear, we did brain wash.
By Conservative Yankee, March 31 at 11:18 am # ReasonsJerry Wright is black (well sort of) and Jerry Falwell was white (I guess) what is the difference between saying “God brought 9/11 down on us because we embrace values Leviticus (The house of pre-xtian rabbis)warn against” and saying The Muslims inflicted 9/11 on us because we treated them badly. One of the reason’s Wright’s sermons do not connect with “white America” is that most white folks do not trace their line back through slaves. Most white folks have not lived in a Ghetto, and it is difficult to tell one white (say a Catholic liberal) from another (say a protestant conservative) I have lived in a Ghetto, I have listened to priests in a Catholic Church say things much like what Wright said to his followers. In some fashion, it is a message of hope. here are some phrases I heard while at St. Peter’s on Main South in Worcester” “The Devil sits with those charlatans in Boston who believe it is right and just to take from those who have almost nothing and give to those who live like royalty.” “Theft is not wrong when only profit is lost while the hunger of a child is sated.” “The prisoners in West Boyleston (Worcester House of Correction) have committed no worse acts than has the Governor of this Commonwealth” “The poor can never be as evil as the rich, for it takes money and power to be so universally cruel while remaining blissfully unaware of the consequences.” These statements, when taken together, essentially say; “God Damn The Commonwealth”
By jack, March 31 at 9:11 am # Unedited sermonsPeople should take the time out to listen to the unedited sermons of Wright on youtube.
By jack, March 31 at 8:39 am # Wright never encourages hate of anyone. He is a critic of the US gov’t and uses examples of colonizers throughout history (Ancient Rome, Communist China, Russia etc) and their subsequent downfall due to their refusal to behave in a moral and ethical way.
By Austin, March 31 at 7:16 am # Krauthammer right for once.(Fox’s Charles Krauthammer berated Wright for saying the 9/11 attacks were “chickens coming home to roost.” Krauthammer labeled the pronouncement “vitriolic divisiveness”) Krauthammer is right: the statement is divisive because it divides those who want to know the truth--whatever that truth may be--from jingoistic nationalists, who shun unpleasant truths and anyone who speaks them.
By Rob Adcox, March 30 at 5:39 pm # Leave it to a liberal to overcomplicate this issue. First of all, Wright claims to be “Christian”, but would a true Christian espouse hatred of an entire race of people from a pulpit? Of course not. Since God is no respector of persons, why should Wright be? Does he think his business is more important than God’s? I know he’s arrogant (another unchristian trait), but come on. And let’s not forget the real reason Wright condemns we crackers: because he knows that there is an entire industry of race manipulation as pioneered by con artists like Sharpton and Jackson. Wright has ZERO credibility.
By republicanSScareme, March 30 at 3:32 pm # The nut-wing would be wise to hide what Reverend Wright says instead of advertising it. The more people hear what he says, the more they agree with him.
By Bill Blackolive, March 30 at 7:28 am # I'm with Cyrenaon this one, because organised religion is this idiotic attempt by caged humans to believe Spirit can be organized, like Earth’s Ocean or space or eternity or infinity of dimension.
By Jack, March 30 at 5:49 am # In the USA if you are half -black you are considered Black. Every African-American has a percentage of European ancestry due the the sexual exploitation of Black women during and after slavery. S0me Blacks have a small percentage of Native- American and European ancestry. The recent PBS series African -American lives showed this. The show demonstrated that nearly all Blacks have 15-40 percent European ancestry. Due to this rule (one drop) there are no white people named Washington or Jefferson. These two presidents had children with their slave women and whites back in those days did not want to be mistaken for one of his Black children which would have open them up to racism, loss of income, rejection , lynchings etc. This tradition of white men impregnating/raping Black women continued till modern times (Strom Thurmon). It is interesting and surprising that he actually kept in touch with her but white men having such superior status would never be questioned by society. |
COMMENT TOOLS:
Hide comments
Show comments
Comment on this article