![]() ![]() |
![]() |
| |
|
Is Wright Right About Racism?Posted on Mar 27, 2008By David Sirota Since the 1960s, bigotry has undergone an aesthetic makeover. Today, the most pernicious racists do not wear pointy hoods, scream epithets and anonymously burn crosses from behind masks. They don starched suits, recite sententious bromides and stage political lynchings before television cameras. For proof, behold the mob stalking Barack Obama’s former pastor, Jeremiah Wright. Wright has long delivered fiery (and occasionally outrageous) sermons, to little fanfare. Now, though, a gang of thugs is inflicting a guilt-by-association blow to Obama by excoriating his spiritual adviser for three specific declarations. Sean Hannity, Fox News’ own George Wallace, turned a fire hose on Wright for his church’s focus. “[The church] is all about the black community,” Hannity thundered, claiming that means Wright supports “a black-separatist agenda.” Pat Buchanan billy-clubbed Wright for saying, “God damn America.” The MSNBC commentator, who avoided the draft, implied that Wright, a former Marine, lacks sufficient loyalty to country. Out of context, Wright’s exclamation was admittedly offensive. But remember: It punctuated a speech about segregation. Buchanan, nonetheless, unleashed, deriding “black hustlers” and insisting descendants of those “brought from Africa in slave ships” owe whites a thank you. “Where is the gratitude?” he asked. Fox’s Charles Krauthammer berated Wright for saying the 9/11 attacks were “chickens coming home to roost.” Krauthammer labeled the pronouncement “vitriolic divisiveness” despite our government acknowledging the concept of “blowback”—or retaliation—that Wright was referencing. The CIA knows that when it supports foreign dictatorships, there can be blowback from radicals. While blowback is often immoral and undeserved, its existence is undisputed. Yet, Krauthammer alleged that Wright takes “satisfaction in the deaths of 3,000 innocents.” In promoting the Wright “controversy,” most media outlets joined this mob and embraced “colorblind racism,” says Duke University’s Eduardo Bonilla-Silva, author of “Racism Without Racists.” It is polite pinstriped prejudice shrouding bigotry in feigned outrage against extremism—the operative word being feigned. After all, John McCain solicited the endorsement of John Hagee, the pastor who called the Catholic Church “the Great Whore.” Similarly, according to Mother Jones magazine, Hillary Clinton belongs to the “Fellowship,” a secretive group “dedicated to ‘spiritual war’ on behalf of Christ.” She is also friendly with Billy Graham, the minister caught on tape spewing anti-Semitism. But while Wright’s supposed “extremism” blankets the news, McCain and Clinton’s relationships with real extremists receive scant attention. Why is it “controversial” for one pastor to address the black community, racism and blowback, but OK for another pastor to slander an entire religion? Why is it news that one candidate knows a sometimes-impolitic clergyman, but not news that his opponent associates with an anti-Semite? Does the double standard prove the dominant culture despises a black man confronting taboos but accepts whites spewing hate? Does the very reaction to Wright show he’s right about racism? Clinton seems to think so. Her aides have been describing as their political “firewall” the states they believe Obama will lose. That’s campaign-speak for “race wall”—one built with bricks like Pennsylvania and Indiana. These aren’t the near purely white states where racial politics is often muted (and Obama won). They are the slightly diverse states where racial politics simmers and where the black vote is too small to offset a motivated racist vote. This race wall is now being fortified. ABC News reports that Clinton’s campaign is “pushing the Wright story” ahead of the Pennsylvania and Indiana primaries. The crass tactic is designed to motivate the racist vote by reminding whites of Obama’s connection to the African-American community. Put another way, Clinton’s message has become simply: Obama Is black.
Wright probably expected this brouhaha. He says our government is “controlled by rich white people” and our culture afflicted by racism. Though these statements are also deemed distasteful by the Establishment, they are truisms. You can see their veracity in the collected portraits of white millionaires commonly called the congressional photo directory. Or, just turn on your television and watch the mob continue stoking the Wright “controversy.”
© 2008 Creators Syndicate Inc. Previous item: Iraq Exploding as Shiite Fights Shiite Next item: Guilty by Observation Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.
Comment Pages:
1
»
By Will, April 27 at 8:20 pm # Re:You speak the truth. I keep hoping that mainstream media will finally (but before its too late) reveal “the emperor’s new clothes,” i.e. attacks on Wright, pandering to the “uneducated blue-collar whites,” to be what it is: pure, simple, obvious racism.
By Conservative Yankee, April 7 at 4:45 am # Bill's women seem to be a type.BUT Bill’s far too fat… maybe 200 hundred before his heart attack!
By jack, April 6 at 8:34 am # The Real EVESee the Discovery Channel website/internet search for info on the research for the documentary “The Real Eve” It is a documentary done a bit like a feature film which traces the entire human race to 3 women who lived in Africa thousands of years ago.
By Conservative Yankee, April 5 at 6:06 am # I ass-u-me (always a bad idea)You are speaking of the “Reverend Jonathon Wells PHD?” You just refer to him as “Wells” so he’s hard to research.
By Conservative Yankee, April 4 at 7:22 am # Insulting and incorrect bad dad combination !It is physically impossible for “ALL humans” to be “...descended from a single man who lived in Africa around 60,000 years ago.” If the human race has been here and widespread (In China as well as Africa) for 200,000 years. Even Magic Johnson can’t fuck that many women worldwide and he has a plane! I assume you must have misunderstood what was being said. The racial differences that distinguish Peking Man and those from the Spanish “homo antecessor” (400,000 BC) were already established. Many theories and no absolutes…
By Jack, April 4 at 6:46 am # Re: Reply to jackShe was his slave and mother of his five kids. He built a tunnel to her quarters so he could visit her when he wished. A slave does what the master requests. She was not owned by anyone but Jefferson and was 16 years old when he began his “relationship” with her. The popular view of the founding fathers as great leaders and Christian men of high moral character is a bit changed when you look at their actions (rapes,sexual exploitation, torture,etc). This may explain why Blacks do not get misty-eyed when these guys are mentioned.
By jack, April 3 at 7:14 am # Re: Reply to jackI am not speaking of times prior to the North American slave trade. The founding fathers and other wealthy slave owners did sexually exploit slave women. I mentionned Strom Thurmon as an example of how long the behaviors existed and as a rich, white man in modern times who had more power to use his Black servant ( who mysteriously died a few years after child birth). There is no moral outrage at these men who have had the power to rape/abuse women without consequences . There is no sympathy for the hundreds of thousands of girls/women who were sexually exploited for hundreds of years. The mixed blood in African Americans came from the wealthy white,Christian slave owners like Washington , Jefferson. Sally Hemmings was his SLAVE. He did not free her! He built a special room/tunnel so he visit her as he wished. He begain sleeping with her when she was 16 and he was about 40. It is rumored that one of his five kids passed for white. We know that the only people in the USA named Washington or Jefferson are Black since whites at the time did not want to be suspected of actually having Black Blood. Strom Thurman is an example of how long such power and control existed for powerful white men . He is one baby dady who actually helped to support his kid. He had no fear of being questioned or called out for it . See the PBS series “African-American lives” for more info on Black history.
By Conservative Yankee, April 3 at 5:07 am # bert before jumping on others for historical “errors” it is a good idea to get your own version of “facts” to fit reality. From Wikipedia “Peking Man (now sometimes called Beijing Man), also called Sinanthropus pekinensis (currently Homo erectus pekinensis), is an example of Homo erectus. The remains were first discovered in 1923-27 during excavations at Zhoukoudian (Choukoutien) near Beijing (Peking), China. The finds have been dated from roughly 250,000-400,000 years ago” He is not the first “human”. As you note, most scholars believe the first human was female. and most likely born in Africa. There are some studies that contend humans emerged in different areas (South America and Australia) about the same time. So far no link at all has binded the Australian aborigines to any other race. Likewise the Hutu. The 40,000 60,000 start date for humans is one of many Xtian fairy tales.
By jack, April 2 at 4:37 pm # Wright was actually quoting a passage Ambassador Peck, a white person when he stated that the chickens wer coming home to roost. SO you can direct your comments at the at Mr. Peck! IF YOU DARE
By jack, April 2 at 2:24 pm # Re: BERT- Founding fathers and sexual exploitationSee the PBS web site for the documentary African American Lives”
By jack, April 2 at 1:39 pm # Re: Reply to Jack- WAKE UP BERT!I hate to shock you, but nearly all African-Americans are 15-50% white due to the sexual exploitatin of Black women during and after slavery. Pres. Jefferson and Washington are an example of our heroes who had children with their slave women i.e. Sally Hemmings)
By jack, April 2 at 1:27 pm # Re: ShanenolHow does Wright discussing injustice create racism?
By Conservative Yankee, April 2 at 8:48 am # Can you be noble and live in aOnly two types of whites? Wow
By Bill Blackolive, April 2 at 8:42 am # LATEST ON HOMOSAPIENSLatest on homosapiens is we are 200,000 years ago born on Earth. None of this gets taught in the first grade. The US got going on its spoils of war then entered the southern Americas in racist balderdash. By world War I we had too much industrial might for Germany or anyone past World War 11. We have been the most indoctrinated country. Read Henry Miller’s THE AIR CONDITIONED NIGHTMARE. Miller claimed our birds die on this white bread. Other dictatorships ruled in plain fear, we did brain wash.
By DeadNietzsche, March 31 at 11:24 am # Re: Re: Racism Still Here“They don’t know or understand WHY these neighborhoods that suffer high crime rates might involve more black folks, and they don’t have the opportunities to compare or otherwise recognize that the same crimes, (or worse) are perpetrated by an equal or larger number of whites.” Each year, some 1.2 million violent crimes involving blacks and whites occur nationwide. In fully 90 percent of those cases, according to U.S. Justice Department figures, the perpetrators are black and the victims are white. Violent white felons choose black victims for fewer than 3 percent of their attacks, whereas violent black felons choose white victims about 56 percent of the time. Statistically, the “average” African American is an astonishing 56 times more likely to attack a white than vice versa. In one recent year, approximately 100 black women were raped by white men; the corresponding number of white women raped by black men was over 20,000, according to Dinesh D’Souza in The End of Racism.
By Conservative Yankee, March 31 at 11:18 am # ReasonsJerry Wright is black (well sort of) and Jerry Falwell was white (I guess) what is the difference between saying “God brought 9/11 down on us because we embrace values Leviticus (The house of pre-xtian rabbis)warn against” and saying The Muslims inflicted 9/11 on us because we treated them badly. One of the reason’s Wright’s sermons do not connect with “white America” is that most white folks do not trace their line back through slaves. Most white folks have not lived in a Ghetto, and it is difficult to tell one white (say a Catholic liberal) from another (say a protestant conservative) I have lived in a Ghetto, I have listened to priests in a Catholic Church say things much like what Wright said to his followers. In some fashion, it is a message of hope. here are some phrases I heard while at St. Peter’s on Main South in Worcester” “The Devil sits with those charlatans in Boston who believe it is right and just to take from those who have almost nothing and give to those who live like royalty.” “Theft is not wrong when only profit is lost while the hunger of a child is sated.” “The prisoners in West Boyleston (Worcester House of Correction) have committed no worse acts than has the Governor of this Commonwealth” “The poor can never be as evil as the rich, for it takes money and power to be so universally cruel while remaining blissfully unaware of the consequences.” These statements, when taken together, essentially say; “God Damn The Commonwealth”
By jack, March 31 at 9:11 am # Unedited sermonsPeople should take the time out to listen to the unedited sermons of Wright on youtube.
By jack, March 31 at 8:39 am # Wright never encourages hate of anyone. He is a critic of the US gov’t and uses examples of colonizers throughout history (Ancient Rome, Communist China, Russia etc) and their subsequent downfall due to their refusal to behave in a moral and ethical way.
By Austin, March 31 at 7:16 am # Krauthammer right for once.(Fox’s Charles Krauthammer berated Wright for saying the 9/11 attacks were “chickens coming home to roost.” Krauthammer labeled the pronouncement “vitriolic divisiveness”) Krauthammer is right: the statement is divisive because it divides those who want to know the truth--whatever that truth may be--from jingoistic nationalists, who shun unpleasant truths and anyone who speaks them. Add Your Comment |
COMMENT TOOLS:
Hide comments
Show comments
Comment on this article