![]() |
|
||
|
Too Big to FailPosted on Mar 20, 2008BOSTON—I don’t know too many economists who get confused with preachers. But there are times when they talk about virtue and temptation as if they were free-market Holy Rollers. Consider the phrase that has been popping up all over the Bear Stearns debacle: “moral hazard.” No, Moral Hazard is not the name of a country and western singer. It’s the phrase economists use to explain why people shouldn’t be protected from the consequences of their actions. In The Wall Street Journal’s definition, moral hazards are “the distortions introduced by the prospect of not having to pay for your sins.” The idea began as an argument against insurance. If you had fire insurance, you’d be careless around matches. Zap, more fires. In recent decades, it’s been used as a righteous reason for shredding safety social nets and toughening laws like those against declaring bankruptcy. Such safety nets, it’s argued, only encourage more sinners, excuse me, welfare mothers and bankrupt families. The same language of morality has been used by economic fundamentalists who don’t want to help homeowners who got subprime mortgage loans and found find themselves in deep foreclosure weeds. Mike Huckabee once said that it “is not the purpose of government to prop people up from every poor decision they make. ... It creates an enabling co-dependency.” And as recently as last weekend, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson insisted that government actions to prevent foreclosures would “do more harm than they would do good.” I grant you that moral hazard is not a myth. But most of the sermons railing against the harm of helping others are directed at the poorer pews. Advertisement This leads us right into the den of Bear Stearns. Last weekend, while its chief executive was off playing bridge, one of the most aggressive, cowboy firms in the mortgage securities business collapsed. The government brokered a deal with J.P. Morgan Chase to buy the firm and guarantee its loans with your tax dollars. Bailout is too strong a word for what happened. Teaspooned-out would be better. The Bear Stearns worker bees looking at their life savings and pensions disappear are not flitting off to the beach, although I was charmed to note that the company will have grief counselors at hand. But it is true that the government went to the rescue. Suddenly, the risk of sin took a back seat to the risk of a full-scale economic disaster. As Rep. Barney Frank, chair of the House Financial Services Committee, says ruefully, “People in the financial community were able to take sectors of the economy hostage and we have to pay a ransom. The best we can hope for is to keep the ransom as low as possible and help the least undeserving.” Is there a Sunday school lesson here? Economic fundamentalists preach that the market—that wonderfully anthropomorphized creature—needs absolute freedom to operate. As Jacob Hacker, author of “The Great Risk Shift,” says, “We’ve had this massive shift of economic risk from government to people. We got blinded by the idea that economic innovation benefits all of us. It’s not true.” The unregulated creativity to buy and bundle mortgages made many of these firms a real bundle. But when the scheme tanked, they too ran for help. If we’re going to rescue, we have to regulate. And before we wrap up the sermon, a last word. If a financial firm is “too big to fail”—a status I’ve always aspired to—why aren’t homeowners? They too are on the brink of destroying not only themselves but their communities. At the very least, Frank and Sen. Chris Dodd have introduced homeowner bills that would contain and share the damage. Ronald Reagan, the patron saint of Republicans, used to say, “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are: ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’ ” This notion infiltrated the national consciousness. Any sort of government help was framed as hapless, useless or, yes, a moral hazard. Reagan’s line always got a belly laugh. Well, folks, not in this Bear (Stearns) market. Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment
|
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved. |
By msgmi, March 22, 2008 at 4:50 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
The Financial House is infested with termites and the administration is trying to keep the lid on a steaming pot. The sub-prime fiasco is the tip of the iceberg and it has just started to shake up the financial institutions with the first victim being Bear Stearns. That said, the credit cruch is tightening while the Fed is trying to stop the bleeding with a bandaide approach in order to camouflage the uncertaintees of other financial entities which are in denial of their problematic solvency. Several years ago Congrees passed Capter 12 legislation which it thought would help the creditors while throwing the individual borrower under the bus. It will all come to a headlong overboil, when the shit hits the fan. The trillion dollar credit card debt is a house of cards. The temporary financial fix needs to be supplemented with immediate oversight legislation in order to stop the bleeding before a financial implosion cripples the financial market to a point that will make the ‘29 crash look like a puff of smoke. I wouldn’t be so pessimistic if GW et al were not in office. We all know his track record of accomplishments and associations.
Report thisBy Bill Rossiter, March 20, 2008 at 10:36 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Some folks got the gold mine, and some folks got the shaft.
The gold mine was for the real estate and mortgage brokers who steered would-be homeowners into easy-credit sub prime mortgages. Cant lose, they said, because real estate value gonna rise FOREVER!
Then the fine print kicked in, and the interest rate hit the ceiling, and real estate tanked. And the buyer got the shaft.
Shaftee couldnt pay? No problem for the brokerhe had his commission and his BMW, and the bank wrapped the mortgages in tasty bundles and fed them to Biggies on Wall Street. Nice snack.
But two million shaftees had to drop the house keys in the mailbox and move the family into Moms basement. There are seven million more shaftees collecting cardboard boxes for the big move, too.
Now when the move-to-Moms-place started, people like Treasury Secretary Paulson and Federal Reserve boss Bernanke wagged a scolding finger at those unfortunate basement-dwellers: Naughty naughty. No government help for you. Let this be a lesson to ye in the Sacred Laws of Market Discipline, and may the pawnshops have mercy on yer miserable souls. And dont bother me at work.
But then the bogus bargain mortgages, the rotten root of the problem, started to stink up the board rooms of the rich and famous. They had pretended that these all-but-worthless papers were real money and used them as collateral to borrow more money. Big mistake. Feet of clay. Rotten roots.
The investment bank, Big Bad Bear Stearns, which had been gobbling up these rotten roots, suddenly developed terminal indigestion, and in a quick flip-flop Mr. Bernanke and the other People Who Matter said, Market Discipline? Um. . .heh heh. . .just kidding. After all, these are real people losing moneyyou know, the guys with a $400k income. Hell, I play squash with these guys! We cant let them take a hit. Forget the rules, BAIL THEM OUT.
And now JP Morgan Chase is swallowing Bear Stearns, indigestion and all. If Morgan makes money on the deal, good. But if the indigestion crops up again, Bernanke will front them $30 billion of taxpayers money to buy Maalox. As they say, privatize profits, socialize losses.
Something wrong with this picture? Yup.
Everyone, including Mr. Bernanke, agrees that the real problem is those rotten roots, the failed mortgages. OK, then, fix the dang failed mortgages. Feed the roots, and you feed the tree. Bernanke is polishing the apples at the top, but theyll wither again if the roots keep dying. Rather than drop thirty billion into the laps of the Wall Street moguls, how about easing the interest rates or re-setting the rules for the folks in Moms basement?
Report thisEditors at the Wall Street Journal are feeling sorry for the bankers who will be looking for work after Morgan eats the Bear. How about some sympathy for the poor shaftees at the bottom, the ones the Bear et up?
By Leefeller, March 20, 2008 at 10:02 pm #
From the beginning our government was set up to protect the wealth of the wealthy. It has always done so, history tells the truth. Truth, something we are not used to from our government.
Not sure, but I believe the individuals wealth was in the minds of the founding fathers, not corporate interests. In the end wealth and power go hand in hand. Follow the money.
Control of the mass media and help from religion the people are dumbed down, works quite well wouldn’t you say?
Report thisBy cyrena, March 20, 2008 at 9:48 pm #
At this point DennisD, do you really think that ‘voting’ independent is any different from ‘voting’ dem or repug?
I guess my point is that if nothing can be changed by voting D or R, why would ‘voting’ independent change anything?
If ‘voting’ can change anything at this point, (and I think that it still can if it’s allowed to happen), folks need to get away from the confines of just those party designators.
We DO have an opportunity to vote ‘independent’ if it’s about changing the status quo. But, it requires looking beneath those initials of D, R, and I, simply because they’ve come to mean relatively little in the political enviornment of today.
It means paying attention to the candidates, and less to the party letter they are attached to.
That is….IF a ‘vote’ for anybody is going to make a change.
Report thisBy Purple Girl, March 20, 2008 at 6:33 pm #
I’m sure that’s how it reads now.
Report thisso easy to change paper into gold- both vauleless - but a goldmine for the America Inc’s
We have not only been Enslaved by these imperilaist, we have been robbed, kidnapped, gagged , and Tortured, along with the rest of mankind. What makes the Inc’s any different from the Monarchs and ‘Popes’ our ancestors escaped and set about to barr from our country in the future? Absolutely Nothing. Treason, War crimes and Crimes Against Humanity . This ol’ Bleeeding Heart Liberal, handgun opposer, Peacenik is ready to start stocking up on arms and sitting on my own front Porch to await the arrival of Blackwater - the Inc’s Mercenary force. For our antionhas been Infiltrated and contaminated and I am ready to assist in the Disinfection process.
They can seize all the material bobbles , but the can not steal OUR Spirit!‘Give Me Liberty or Give me Death’ courses through our blood!
By Conservative Yankee, March 20, 2008 at 5:00 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
The government blew a golden opportunity BIG TIME. Bear was for sale when its stock was selling at $80. The Chinese were interested and wanted a Wall Street Bank to launder their trillions of extra US bucks. BUT our government STOPPED the sale because after all we can’t have slanty-eyed people owning a Wall Street firm…
What a laugh if they had sold to the Commies for $80 a company worth $2… and we wouldn’t be having this discussion now…. just a good ole-fashion Yankee laugh.
Report thisBy mr trail safety, March 20, 2008 at 4:01 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
The entire upper-level “team” should be pushing shopping carts along the side of the highway picking up bottles and cans then they can find out what “moral hazard” and “the hand of the market” really means.
Report thisBy amunaor, March 20, 2008 at 3:45 pm #
<But I digress. The point is that these folks (with the money) can do pretty much as they please. There is only one thing they fear, and that is a massive, or majority embrace of socialistic government.>
Yep, what hypocrites! Capitalists fear the masses they exploit and depend on to sell their product to. What an irony!
Report thisBy amunaor, March 20, 2008 at 3:37 pm #
By PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS
...The fact of the matter is that the US is bankrupt. David M. Walker, Comptroller General of the US and head of the Government Accountability Office, in his December 17, 2007, report to the US Congress on the financial statements of the US government noted that “the federal government did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting (including safeguarding assets) and compliance with significant laws and regulations as of September 30, 2007.” In everyday language, the US government cannot pass an audit.
Moreover, the GAO report pointed out that the accrued liabilities of the federal government “totaled approximately $53 trillion as of September 30, 2007.” No funds have been set aside against this mind boggling liability.
Just so the reader understands, $53 trillion is $53,000 billion.
Frustrated by speaking to deaf ears, Walker recently resigned as head of the Government Accountability Office….
Full Story:
http://www.counterpunch.org/roberts03182008.html
I agree! Yes it was a bailout! Yes the tax paying public will have to eat all of this ‘rotten paper’, that is, of course, if there are any tax payers left, if and when the dust settles.
Peace, Best Wishes and Hope
Report thisBy Aegrus, March 20, 2008 at 2:07 pm #
There was a bailout because the government federally insured thirty-billion dollars of investments, which belonged to bear-sterns.
Report thisBy WriterOnTheStorm, March 20, 2008 at 1:41 pm #
I’m far from an expert on economics, but it seems to me that there was no bail out here at all. B-S was about to go bankrupt, so the fed stepped in to arrange a ‘buyout’ at bargain basement rates. The whole thing was a move to avoid the market panic that would have ensued had the industry giant gone down in flames. As for the B-S fat cats and worker bees, they would have been in roughly the same situation no matter how the company’s end was characterized. There’s no moral lesson here, just pundits grinding axes.
Report thisBy 1twenty1, March 20, 2008 at 12:40 pm #
Broadcasting out our ‘stimuli’ like so much chicken feed only gives ‘the powers that be’ the excuse to ‘bail out with billions ’ the big boys!
Report thisBy Conservative Yankee, March 20, 2008 at 11:31 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
So if you don’t like what they are doing, make a sign, and stand in front of Bear Stearns and protest!
My father, a great oil company capitalist once told me of a Mobil Oil tax man who was cornered by the IRS for some “questionable deductions” he was asked to “come in for review and bring all relevant papers.”
He showed up in Washington with three railroad boxcars filled to overflow with company documents which he felt “might be relevant”
IRS not having the staff, nor the time to go through all those papers dismissed the case.
The punch line was most of the papers in those cars were just ordinary waste paper.
There was another incident where the company left $750k in the Grand Central lobby to break a truck drivers strike, Some homeless dude walked in, picked up the attaché case and walked off into the sunset… The company couldn’t report the loss because then they would have had to explain why the money was where it was…. so they just got another $750K and did the same thing again… I assume it worked, for the strike was over the following day.
But I digress. The point is that these folks (with the money) can do pretty much as they please. There is only one thing they fear, and that is a massive, or majority embrace of socialistic government.
As long as they can keep the liberals/conservatives, the blacks/whites, the Protestant/Catholic/Jews middle-class/poor divided, they don’t have to worry.
Report thisBy DennisD, March 20, 2008 at 10:34 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Wall St. always has been a rigged game, study its history. Our rigged government has just followed their lead and decided to become obvious about it.
Deals that used to be done in back rooms are now front page news because they don’t fear any reprisal.
Some people might complain for a few days then it’s back to BAU.
If anyone thinks they can change it by voting D or R, think again. Heads they win, tails we lose. Vote independent and/or get ready for the inevitable revolution. Because that’s what will be needed to really change anything.
Report thisBy Leefeller, March 20, 2008 at 8:43 am #
Looking at events as they happen and how they are handled, one knows the common person does not count for anything. From the war, to Katrina, to the money covering the asses of special interests. Welfare for the rich.
From the cutbacks in education to ignoring health care. The grand plan is to keep the masses ignorant and sick and send them to war. Need to make sure they do not get a decent wage, or else they get too uppity.
Now the trickle-down theory, controlled passing of alms, to keep them in line .
Report thisBy Aegrus, March 20, 2008 at 8:11 am #
It’s class warfare. Plain and simple.
Report this