![]() ![]() |
![]() |
| |
|
Gore Vidal Speaks Seriously Ill of the DeadPosted on Mar 20, 2008
By Gore Vidal I can recall that day in the 1930s when a “news” (sic) magazine appeared in Washington, D.C.; it was called Newsweek: meant to be a counterbalance to Time Magazine’s uncontrollable malice. In due course the two became sadly alike as Vincent Astor morphed into Henry Luce: Was it something in the water? I once asked Henry Luce why he called Time a news magazine when it was simply Uncle Harry’s means of venting his rage (this was 1960 or so) at liberals, and “degenerate art” like the plays of Tennessee Williams—he had no answer. At Newsweek Vincent Astor was far too stupid to answer any such complaint. Now here we are in the Newsweek of 2008, and it’s still lousy. There have been a few decent writers in between that were less nutty than today’s Newsweek hacks. But why is Newsweek currently lousy? Here’s an example provided by an editor who keeps a sharp eye on their crimes. He sent me their recent obituary of William F. Buckley, a hero to those who feared democracies.
Unknown to them and everyone else who might read that publication, my views on many matters do not conform to the tired hacks who’ve taken over Newsweek, a magazine that has convinced itself that Bobby Kennedy Sr. was a great liberal. They love throwing about misunderstood terms like liberal and conservative that seldom suit their superficial, not to mention malicious, standards. Recently, their words of mourning for the fallen “genteel” paladin were incredible. As my editor friend knew that I seldom read the wilder attacks on me, he deconstructs Newsweek’s obituary of Buckley: Parenthetically, I should note that, back in 1968, ABC TV had asked me and Buckley to “debate” each other at the Democratic and Republican conventions. Although Buckley was often drunk and out of control, he was always a spontaneous liar on any subject that his dizzy brain might extrude. When we were in Chicago during the Republican convention, the Chicago police decided it would be fun to attack the young co-ed demonstrators in Grant Park, not far from our studio. It was one of the worst displays of police brutality I’ve ever seen, and so I said on air; he liked what the police had done; in no time, the whole country was as shocked as I, but not Buckley. On air he was hissing like a cobra against the young people in Grant Park because, he said, they were egging on the Viet Cong to kill American Marines. They were not, of course. Buckley was a world-class American liar on the far right who would tell any lie he thought he could get away with. Years of ass-kissing famous people in the press and elsewhere had given him, he felt, a sort of license to libelously slander those hated liberals who, from time to time, smoked him out as I did in Chicago, when I defended the young people in Grant Park by denying that they were Nazis and that the only “pro- or crypto-Nazi” I could think of was himself. He sued me and got nowhere. He sued Esquire, in which our words appeared. By then the coming right-wing surge was in view. And so Esquire cravenly agreed to settle with him for a few paragraphs worth of free advertising for his weird little magazine The National Review, hardly the great victory he claimed. Now, to Newsweek’s obituary of this late dishonorable American in which my editor-friend assures me that his brain-dead son Christopher had a hand: “Buckley bridled at bullies.” And who was the bully in context? Myself. He was also an expert at changing indefensible contexts. Buckley maintained that I supported revolutionaries who favored murdering U.S. Marines. Yet all the talk of Nazis etc. was started by Buckley. There was no lie he would not tell to get back at those who defeated him in debate. The current editors at Newsweek appear to have listened eagerly to his son Christopher, who is guiding them to a benign view of what had been a most hysterical queen (WFB), much admired by a media that takes everyone at his own evaluation of himself as they did with Capote, who told them that he was a great writer like Proust (pronounced Prowst) and the hacks ate it up. The correct assessment of any reputation today is so far from plausible reality that it might be a good thing if the hacks of a magazine like Newsweek steered clear of characterizing those disliked by the advertisers; hence his creepy son’s depiction of me as a “bully” when I was simply attending to one, and then—o, joy!—Buckley called me a “queer” and actually threatened me with physical violence, so great was his testosterone level. Next, the loyal son, suspecting that the pejorative use of “queer” is politically incorrect in mag-land, Christopher rambles into a story about his father’s kindness to a Mr. Bauman who had lost his seat in Congress after the congressman had been caught while soliciting Oral Sex from a 16-year-old male (note how prurient Newsweek’s prose is, in describing undesirable people). Chris weeps into his computer as he describes how Dad gave the poor sinner of the flesh an envelope containing $10,000 (I bet?) in cash adding, mysteriously, “He was a knightly man”: Who was—the cocksucker recipient of Buckley’s charity? Or his admirer, Mr. Buckley himself?—Bauman was very right wing, it is said. RIP WFB—in hell. The unique mess that our republic is in can be, in part, attributed to a corrupt press whose roots are in mendacious news (sic) magazines like Time and Newsweek, aided by tabloids that manufacture fictional stories about actual people. This mingling of opinion and fiction has undone a media never devoted to truth. Hence, the ease with which the Republican smear-machine goes into action when they realize that yet again the party’s permanent unpopularity with the American people will cause them defeat unless they smear individually those who question the junk that the media has put into so many heads. Anyone who says “We gotta fight ’em over there or we’re gonna have to fight ’em over here.” This absurdity has been pronounced by every Republican seeking high office. The habit of lying is now a national style that started with “news” magazines that was further developed by pathological liars that proved to be “good” Entertainment on TV. But a diet of poison that has done none of us any good. I speak ex cathedra now, ad urbe et orbe, with a warning that no society so marinated in falsity can long survive in a real world. Purchase signed first editions from Gore Vidal’s personal library at the Truthdig Bazaar. Previous item: The Pentagon Has Always Gone Hollywood Next item: On His Own Terms Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.
Comment Pages:
«1
2
By Bruce M Smith, March 21 at 11:59 am # Vidal's are Vital..for AmericaAs a lucky American now retired in France, and never trustng the Bush family, changed to Euros long ago, I paid for it! Sort of…
By Karen Miller, March 21 at 11:36 am # Vidal - BuckleyYes, William F. Buckley was a true simpleton (and tasteless at that), I believe that would make him an insipid ninny. We scream loudest about the things we are most guilty of and boy that seems true of the right who are always screaming about something since speaking softly about it would draw no attention.
By Tony Waters, March 21 at 11:23 am # Gore's clear visionGore Vidal never seems to be blown off course. He just tells the highly unvarnished truth, and lets the reader either digest it or find it indigestible. Good to see that age and a wheelchair have not blunted his blade.
By Dr. Vogel, March 21 at 11:14 am # Funniest ting I've read all year.Gore Vidal called Buckley a queen. And his son an imbecile. And called out the so-called liberal media for the intolerant wack-jobs and shills to the Right that they are. I get the sense that Mr. Vidal is as embarrassed to be an American as most of us are now. As an aside, one of my favorite Buckley moments was when ABC had big roundtable after the first airing of “The Day After.” Buckley was trying to respond to something, mostly through drunken mumbling, holding his fountain pen to his cheek as he so often did, and Ted Koppel, the moderator, told him to sit up straight and speak into the microphone. Let’s just say that Koppel completely punked him, and Buckley knew it. I think Carson may have done the same once. Thanks, Mr. Vidal, we’ll forgive the sloppy Latin.
By Bill Blackolive, March 21 at 10:32 am # Mr. Vidal, what might ever change this land’s most indoctrinated population in history than the shock of learning 9/ll is inside? I tell old friends go to patriotsquestion9/ll. They get their shock. Maybe they say this is shills, I say to them they have yet to go there, here be from 40 two Septembers back now a thousand famous howling, known people, besides the firemen trying to speak to Michael Moorer and so on. Hey, we have got to start. Hey, keep your noble self in the flesh a time further, life on Earth might improve, be worth a good drink.
By ahansen, March 21 at 6:38 am # He lives!My God. Purple Girl’s channeled Buckley!
By Suzanne Lynch, March 21 at 6:37 am # Norman ThomasI read God and Man at Yale while I was an undergrad and wondered even then why WFB did not simply transfer to Holy Cross or Georgetown if he found the agnosticism at Yale so threatening. His analytical skills might well have been improved had he taken Catholic theology or Philosophy at a Catholic school. Later I watched his TV until he brutally attacked a very elderly Norman Thomas whom he had invited to be his guest. It was a despicable display and formed my permanent distaste for all things Buckley. He made a career of enlarging himself at the expense of others. I trust he has gone into the void he deserves.
By oldgeezerpilot, March 21 at 6:16 am # American Treasure Part DeuxFans of Gore Vidal should read this interview he did for CityPages three years ago. http://citypages.com/databank/26/1268/article13085.asp The man is right on the money… as usual.
By Jean Tracy, March 21 at 6:08 am # The truthThanks, Gore Vidal for telling it like it was. The most I remember about William Buckley was his “batting” his eyes every few moments. Let’s hope that some day we get only truth from the media. J. Tracy
By Conservative Yankee, March 21 at 4:56 am # "...fictional stories about actual people."Although I agree with some of what Mr. Vidal says above, his label; “Lier” falls flat on the basis of Videl’s own prevarications. He rails about the country being in the position it is because Gore Vidal’s latest novel, authors tell “...fictional stories about actual people” One only need read “Burr” to understand Vidal’s hypocrisies. My mother approached him at Random House in 1973 after she had completed the book. She asked “why did you call it Burr as it is devoid of all but a few generalized facts on the man” He curled his lip and sneered at her “Why do you think it says “A Novel?” Vidal has a warped unequal standard. Had Vidal died first, Buckley could have made the assertions above, and they would have carried the same weight.
By nana, March 20 at 7:23 pm # ROCK ON, Gore!!!
By lightiris, March 20 at 7:05 pm # Gore Vidal is a treasure. While I’m not sure he has been on the right side of every issue, on most issues one can be assured he will call a spade a spade. Buckley, otoh, was an intelligent asshole who should have known better. Bravo, Mr. Vidal, for stepping up and speaking out. You, sir, are treasure.
By Christopher Robin, March 20 at 7:04 pm # After months of not blogging.... I return to find a new column from Gore Vidal!! To hear a few profess that National Review was “required” reading and such similar nonsense, by self-proclaimed “Democrats”....Well no wonder we’re in the mess we’re in. But I could only think to that moment in 68’. When you confronted the eye-popping droll wind bag...it’s the stuff of lore. I was just 5 years old in 68’, but recall an earlier time where progressive thought at least had a chance on the air waves...Dick Cavett and others, long before the Reagan changes in ad time allotted to broadcasters. Long uninterrupted speech, the stuff interesting talk shows once had....only found now on C-Span. But a few scratchy poor quality black and white short clips exist on YouTube of your near brawl with the condescending snob Buckley. I guess his facade was dropped when cornered. In light of what has passed over these ensuing years , your use of “crypto-Nazi,” turned out to be on the mark...and more telling than his reaction to rioting outside. Considering where the conservative “movement” is now, it’s time to drop “crypto” from their ideology.... It’s passed being veiled...rather it’s unveiled and true to form when called out on it , indignant anger is the only response. See: idiot Jonah Goldberg some think tank twit, who has written some complete revisionist view of history “Liberal Fascism” where he claims fascist movements of the 20th century were liberal constructs! that’s how bad the misinformation is today. Or a descendant of Herbert Hoover writing of the Depression years, reams of revisionist crap. In essence accusing FDR’s policies of prolonging the Depression. Overlooking the depression was well under way for three years before Roosevelt took office, and still deepening. Hoover’s hands off waiting for the “business cycle” to self correct things, was judged in 32’ when he was ousted in a landslide. FDR judged by his reelection to four terms. See, when they can’t handle the truth they lash out , accuse you of their sins, and refute historical facts with very selective use of history. So adherant to bastardizing of the word “Freedom” to apply mainly to property. It’s beyond ignorance, and can only be seen as willful attempts at misinformation, something the National Socialists in Germany were prolific at. Nothing “crypto” about that.
By lightiris, March 20 at 7:04 pm # A TreasureGore Vidal is a treasure. While I’m not sure he has been on the right side of every issue, on most issues one can be assured he will call a spade a spade. Buckley was an intelligent asshole who should have known better. Bravo Mr. Vidal for stepping up and speaking out. You, sir, are treasure.
By Ernie, March 20 at 6:10 pm # Gore Vidal: the GreatestMr. Vidal is our greatest living man of letters. I hope Kurt Vonnegut—perhaps his closest peer when alive—is smiling down on him from above.
By Joe, March 20 at 6:02 pm # I enjoyed Bill Buckley’s novel “Stained Glass” as well as Gore Vidal’s “Burr.” The best way for them would have been the duel with pistols; in earlier times I would have figured Buckley as playing the part of the pushy loon, Burr, but on reading Vidal’s piece here I’m not so sure. Vidal is cool, of course, and here has given me a really good belly-laugh. Buckley’s ghost is swirling around Vidal right now, fucking with keys on the typewriter and such.
By DR, March 20 at 4:53 pm # Thank youThank you, Mr Vidal. Finally someone who has the balls to speak the truth about the ignorant, self-important pedantic ass that was Mr William F. Buckley. He never, EVER, won an argument on the merits; yet, because he could verbally confuse most who would dare speak to him, he, like the French, managed to SEEM intelligent, instead of actually BE intelligent. Thank you, Mr Vidal, then, for your rare sanity.
By Philip B Wood, March 20 at 6:19 pm # Re: Who could even listen to him?BRAVO!!!!!!!!!!!!
By sad old german, March 20 at 4:57 pm # Re: Who could even listen to him?I used to love to watch Buckley’s program on PBS. Best comedy show on tv at the time. Even my apolitical sister rolled with laughter. What a spectacle to watch somebody do for himself what Lil’ Bush on comedy central today is trying to do for the shrub! Add Your Comment |
COMMENT TOOLS:
Hide comments
Show comments
Comment on this article