![]() ![]() |
![]() |
| |
|
The Race Goes OnPosted on Mar 5, 2008BOSTON—In the end, the most memorable line of the primary season may belong to Bill Clinton. He told a church group last month: “I’ve been waiting all my life to vote for an African-American president. I’ve been waiting all my life to vote for a woman for president. ... I feel like God is playing games with our heads and our hearts.” He might have added that God, or some more earthly force, was also playing games with his party. Hillary had barely celebrated her Code Blue victories in Ohio, Texas and Rhode Island before worries began to appear like a crawl across the screen during the victory party. A historic campaign could end up in a historic debacle. Think back to those wonderful yesterdays—well, yesterweeks—when Republicans couldn’t decide whom to vote for because they didn’t like their choices. Democrats were undecided because they liked their choices. Now the worry is that the Republicans have sewn up their nomination while the Democrats are slogging off to the next battleground. While John McCain is saving his money and firepower for the election, Hillary and Barack will be wounding each other in Pennsylvania, Indiana, even Puerto Rico. While McCain can spend months uniting Republicans, Hillary and Barack will spend them dividing Democrats. I understand the danger in the demographics. On Tuesday, Hillary won white women, older voters, working-class people and Hispanics. Obama won younger voters, African-Americans and the college-educated. I’ve been at enough tables lately where Democrats who usually side with each other against Bush now tensely size up each other’s feminist credentials, anti-war loyalties or good sense. The good choices become hard choices accompanied by hard feelings. But allow me to offer the contrarian view that “playing with our heads and hearts” has been a good thing, and that the primary campaign may strengthen, not weaken, the party’s chances. For openers, it’s the “embeds”—the traveling press who look as weary as the candidates—and the party honchos who want it to be over. Two-thirds of the polled Democrats think it should go on. A good part of the energy and excitement of this campaign comes—still—from having a woman and an African-American on the ballot. So far, Clinton and Obama have brought more voters to the polls than any primary campaign in recent memory. A full 59 percent of the Ohio voters were women this year, up seven points from 2004. In Texas they were 57 percent, up four points. Obama engages younger voters. In Ohio alone there was a 10 percent increase in the under-30 vote compared to 2000. If it’s good for Ohio, why not Pennsylvania? Indiana? More to the point, this historic primary season hasn’t just pitted one against the other, but changed the landscape for both. “Is America ready for a female president?” “Is America ready for an African-American president?” When was the last time you read either headline? We’ve put to rest the question of whether a woman is tough enough to be commander in chief. Hillary’s been the tough guy in the race. Win, lose or draw, Hillary has rewritten the common wisdom. It’s also put to rest the question of whether white Americans would vote for an African-American. In the whitest of states, such as Iowa and Vermont, Obama left the bias about bias in tatters. As for the notion that these two candidates will seriously wound each other and one will limp into the race against McCain? Does anyone doubt that Obama is a better candidate now than he was last fall? Quicker on his feet? Sharper at debating? Better at responses? As for Hillary, does anyone doubt her resilience? She lost 11 primaries in a row and came back. Knock her down, she pops up. Nobody wants to see Democrats writing the attack script for Republicans. If you think these two have been rough on each other, remember 2004, when Swift-boating became a verb. This year will it be Monica-ing? Hussein-ing? Primaries are training grounds. And if Tuesday taught us anything, the voters are not through deciding. No, I don’t want to see wrangling at the doorway to the convention. Nor do I want the bad feelings that can also come from calling the game before it’s over. In the end, many of the dividing lines between gender and age are fault lines between mothers and daughters, husbands and wives. I’m betting they’ll heal. So to any Democrat in high gloom over an extended fight, take a deep breath. Then watch a rerun of the designated opponent, John McCain, giving his joyless victory speech Tuesday night. There are many things worse than an extended race between history and herstory. You could, for example, get a Rose Garden endorsement from George W. Bush. Ellen Goodman’s e-mail address is ellengoodman(at)globe.com. © 2008, Washington Post Writers Group Previous item: McCain's Very Own Farrakhan Next item: The Money Behind the Anti-McCain Ad Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment |
By Analyst1970, March 11 at 10:36 am #
Cyrena-
Report this80% = 80% of the black people who are voting in the Democratic Primary race.
By Joe, March 8 at 2:05 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Hi Cyrena, Well, you got your wish, young lady! My boy, Ron Paul, is leaving the campaign trail. I understand he’s going to start a PAC to keep Congress on notice about their ongoing trashing of the Constitution.
Report thisAs for this relevant thread, it’s kind of funny thinking of Obama as a black guy. To me, he typifies the Carl Sagan vision of a future in which the general population is a beautiful cocoa color, highly aware of the world around them and, having finally discarded some of our nuttier traits, have decided, as has Switzerland, to live in comfort minus pointless notions of world domination. I may have lighter skin but the guy is whiter than I am by any useful measure. By the way, real black people are, in my view, way under-pissed about the massive kidnappings of their relatives in previous times. I don’t think any colored kid (Islanders, African, whatever) should be exposed to the humiliating references to their forebears as “former slaves.” The slave aspect was secondary to the fact that they were kidnap victims. Keep that former slave shit out of those young minds. Their relatives survived a criminal conspiracy and that’s the message should be foremost in their minds on the subject. Send this to Tavis Smiley for me, will you? I think it’s important.
By oh bert, March 8 at 1:35 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
bert, have you no heart for song, have you no funny ganglions? There is no venom, sap of mine, since I feel no venom. I have fun with the process, just as the candidates have fun working the voters. Just to be fair to fans of the baby-eater, Hillary, I’ll tell a joke about Obama...one day a shy young kid named Obama was walking home from school. He was kind of skinny so when a bunch of black big kids ganged-up on him, jabbing on about his white mother, Obama used his only weapon..he pulled pulled a 1972 issue of Time magazine out of his fifth-grade leather-bound briefcase, and speedflipped pages till he got to the article on young Republicans...there she was, a full-face picture of Hillary Clinton! The black gang, horrified by what they were being shown, backed away from the little genius and never bothered him again.
Report thisBy bert, March 7 at 9:53 pm #
This has absolutely no place on this or any other site about this or any other candidate! SHAME ON YOU Unregistered commenter. I would want to remain anonymous too if I spewed such venom and hate.
Report thisBy cyrena, March 7 at 7:42 pm #
Analyst1970,
I apparently am still not understanding your 80% voting consistency statistic. That’s how my crack comment came about.
To suggest that African-Americans have maintained an 80% voting record consistently is in my opinion something that a mentally challenged person might suggest.
BUT...maybe I was reading it in terms of ‘over history’ and maybe you were referencing over the past few months, and only in your own community.
So, I’ll allow that there probably IS a portion of the black population in the US, who is in support of Barack Obama simply because he is black, and for no other reasons. (ie issues, character, integrity, the big picture, our future survival, etc). Indeed, I do know that the mentality exists, and I can’t say that I’m proud of it. (I guess that’s why you made the OJ reference).
Still, having lived a while, and been consistently exposed to a variety of many socio-political-economic groups across the country, I’d say that just by our relatively smaller total population, (13%) blacks don’t maintain that mentality (voting while ignorant) any more than any other group of people happens to do. If anything, it’s far less.
If you’re a history scholar, check (when you have time) some of the old ‘Black Codes’. You actually can find all of the ‘voting requirements’ for blacks in the South, as recently as the 60’s. In addition to poll taxes, and a variety of other things, these people who were attempting to exercise their rights to vote were frequently subjected to EXAMS on the Constitution that could serve as preps for law school.
Seriously, some of the questions would throw even Obama, and he’s a professor of Constitutional Law. Needless to say, the white folks at the ‘polling places’ who were ‘administering’ these ‘exams’ ONLY FOR BLACK FOLKS of course, didn’t have a clue to any of the answers themselves. Didn’t matter of course, because if they got every single question correct, they still would be turned away.
Still, I said that to say that even now, many black votes actually DO vote on candidates for the reasons that the whole process was set-up to begin with. So we DO pay attention to these issues, and if it happens to be a black person who IS the candidate, then all the better. Just like those who were making a big deal out of John Edwards haircut. I think he would have been a good president, (and still would be) and the nice haircut was just an added extra.
THAT’S how I see Barack. He would be my own choice, even if he was green or orange, even though my favorite color is coral.
In short....some of us DO pay attention, and it works the opposite way too. I can’t think of a worse Supreme Court choice (at least in my life time) than Clarence Thomas, who by the way, IS a racist! He hates black people and white ones too. But, he hates black folks way more.
We call that ‘internalized’ racism in the sociological world, but I just call HIM a dirty bastard, because it’s just a favorite all purpose term for me.
Report thisBy Hillary admits cannibalism, March 7 at 4:35 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Hillary, half-sister of Saddam, has been photographed in her campaign bus eating boiled babies. Yes, Hillary is a cannibal! In her defense, the babies were very tasty (yes, I tried a finger), served, as they were, with nicely seasoned fava beans. The candidate is deflecting criticism of her unusual diet, stating in a press release, “the babies were Iraqi..they were homeless..I did it for their own good.” This explanation has satisfied US news networks and they’ve moved on to the story about the scofflaw Dennis Kucunich, whose car was ticketed by a meter-maid while he was helping serve breakfast at a Cincinnati homeless shelter.
Report thisBy Analyst1970, March 7 at 2:20 pm #
Cyrena,
I caught the entire State of The Black Union broadcast
I listen to my local Black Radio Station
I subscribe to black pod-casts
And I have heard a lot of negative and derogatory statements, including “racist” used to refer to Hillary.
I do agree with you, however, that I should not have made the general reference and assumed that all black people are voting just on race. I apologize for that, it is wrong, and does serves to demean the grand-ness of Obama’s, candidacy. Again please accept my apologies.
As a slave of history (I love it that much), my tendency is usually to look back before projecting forward, therefore:
1. I discovered that Hillary has truly been a champion for a lot if non-whites, not just in America and all over the world.
2. Wonder why you assumed I was on crack? If white women, or whites were consistently voting 80% plus for Hillary, I sure would hope that a Caucasian would challenge those trends. In spite of your insults I will not be AFRAID to ask the questions.
3. There is fear that leads us to courage, and fear that leads us to caution. I am not afraid to be courageous regardless of the consequences.
4. Minus some unnecessary hostility - I like your post. See you even taught me a lesson in “generalizing”.
Report thisBy cyrena, March 6 at 10:12 pm #
Analyst1970,
Maybe I should first say that you really should have made it clear that you were speaking for your OWN community, and not for the nationwide African-American voting population.
I’m also really curious about what you consider to be a CONSISTENT 80% plus voting record, when all other Americans go up and down, and how..(even if that were true) it is somehow ‘disappointing”.
I’m actually amazed that you would even suggest such a thing. Number one, I’d be DELIGHTED if the nationwide African-American population could maintain such a high percentage, but I have to assume that you’re on crack to say that. And WHY would it be better for it to go ‘up and down’?
Do you have any clue about how long it took for Black folks to even be ALLOWED to vote in this country? Do you have ANY clue about the voter suppression that STILL continues - as I speak- in African-American communities through-out the US? This is particularly problematic in the South, and Florida is notorious for it...voter intimidation, etc, etc.
It’s also pretty disgusting that people cannot express a preference for one candidate, or a dismay over the campaign tactics of another candidate, without being accused of calling either one of them racist.
In short, I have never suggested that Bill or Hillary Clinton was ‘racist’ and the only person on this blog that consistently claims that the Clintons are being attacked as being ‘racist’ is bert. And, she claims to be white.
It IS true that the Clinton’s have long been supported by the black community in the past; at least at least between 1991-1999 or so. Prior to 1990 or 1991, I’m really not sure how much African-Americans outside of Arkansas even KNEW about Bill or Hillary Clinton. I didn’t know anything about them until they started running for national office in the early 90’s. Why should anyone else have?
That said, nobody was accusing them of being racists then, (that I’m aware of) and most of the African-American communities that I know weren’t either.
AND, THEY STILL AREN’T. Nobody has suggested that the Clinton’s are ‘racists’ although there was DEFINITELY a reaction to the faux pas that Bill Clinton committed in South Carolina several weeks ago. Get over it. He did it, and that’s that. Nobody has since painted their entire existence with a broad racist brush, so people like bert should stop complaining about something that hasn’t happened. THAT is dishonest.
That is NOT to say that there hasn’t been an almost abusive demeanor towards the Clintons, but let us be really clear on that...that ‘demeanor’ has existed for as long as the Clintons have been in political life, and it damn sure wasn’t coming from the black communities, and the complaint was never racism. In short, a lot of people have hated them both, for a very long time. And NO, in my own opinion, there was never a logical reason for it, at least not at the time. And, I’ve said that before. I’ve also defended both of them on countless occasions over the years, for what I’ve termed to be hate for absolutely no reason, at least not that I was aware of. So, when we don’t know things, we have nothing to base an opinion on, and I’ve never been one to form opinions based on hear-say or group think.
That said, my opinion of them has sunk to a very low point, and it has nothing to do with racism, and everything to do with the dirty tactics that Hillary has employed in her campaign. Registering these concerns does NOT amount to abuse. It is what it is. It’s speaking to the truth. I am also learning things about the former Clinton admin that were not known at the time, and they aren’t nice. Clinton’s actions in the former Yugoslavia particularly.
So, whenever Hillary or anyone else stoops to the Bush/Rovarian type tactics, you’re going to hear criticisms. Hillary has herself created whatever ‘demeanor’ you perceive as directed toward her. Bill hasn’t helped.
Report thisBy bert, March 6 at 7:52 pm #
I agree 100%. I cannot fathom those who today call the Clintons racist. You can say a lot about them, both good and bad. But they have never, ever been racist. Neither Bill nor Hillary deserve this.
Report thisBy Analyst1970, March 6 at 7:44 pm #
Ditto.
I can’t believe that we are voting between a black man and a woman, and it has made the country more divided into “identity-blocks”. As a black person, I am especially disappointed by my community’s ability to look beyond race. A consistent 80% plus voting record when all other Americans go up and down is disappointing. More disappointing is the almost abusive demeanor towards the Clintons, who have both been allies to our community since they were very young. As one commentator puts it, it’s our “come to O.J.” attitude.
Report thisBy Lenny, March 6 at 4:49 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
The obvious way out of your dilemma Bill,is to vote for a Black Woman for first lady.
Report thisBy bert, March 6 at 3:55 pm #
Ellen writes: “As for the notion that these two candidates will seriously wound each other and one will limp into the race against McCain? Does anyone doubt that Obama is a better candidate now than he was last fall? Quicker on his feet? Sharper at debating? Better at responses? As for Hillary, does anyone doubt her resilience? She lost 11 primaries in a row and came back. Knock her down, she pops up.
Nobody wants to see Democrats writing the attack script for Republicans. If you think these two have been rough on each other, remember 2004, when Swift-boating became a verb. This year will it be Monica-ing? Hussein-ing? Primaries are training grounds. And if Tuesday taught us anything, the voters are not through deciding.”
I don’t usually agree with Ellen. But this time she is spot on. Great editorial Ellen!!!!
Report thisBy Aegrus, March 6 at 6:31 am #
Identity politics is the real debacle of this campaign season. Real winners? John McCain and Civil Dissonance.
You can’t unite the country by cutting everyone up into different groups.
I’m not sure if it is good or bad we have such heated debate over such a long period of time for the Democratic candidates. I am sure, however, the focus on these primaries and campaigns is going to cause some effect on the voting population in the fall.
Report thisBy Marshall, March 6 at 12:32 am #
...is that race and gender are the things Bill Clinton uses to decide whether someone is fit to be President.
Report this