![]() |
|
| |
|
Bush’s Gas GaffePosted on Mar 3, 2008By Marie Cocco WASHINGTON—Of all the reasons to be hopping mad, helplessly shaking your head or hoping beyond reasonable hope that somehow the Bush presidency will get better before it ends, blaming the president for failure to know the price of gas at the pump isn’t one of them. Blaming President Bush for failing to implement anything close to a rational economic policy—dithering as the American economy sinks toward crisis—is. You have to feel a bit sorry for Bush. At his news conference last week, the president revealed that he had no idea that some analysts are projecting that gas prices will soon hit $4 a gallon. “That’s interesting,” the president mused aloud. “I hadn’t heard that.” Now, reporters always get excited when a politician doesn’t know the price of gas (or milk, or bread, or eggs—you get the picture). Such lapses inevitably become metaphors for out-of-touch politicians who don’t give a hoot for the everyday struggles of average people. But really, on this one, even I’m willing to give Bush a break. He hasn’t driven himself around for at least seven years and certainly doesn’t frequent the self-serve pumps to fill his own tank. No, Bush’s gas-price gaffe is better seen as a speck on the broader canvas of the president’s detached approach to the economy. Generally, he believes that everything is hunky-dory so long as he can point to his tax cuts as an all-purpose panacea. He did it again at the very same news conference where he seemed to be mystified by $4-a-gallon gas: “If you’re out there wondering whether or not—you know, what your life is going to be like and you’re looking at $4 a gallon, that’s uncertain,” Bush said. “And when you couple that with the idea that their taxes may be going up in a couple of years, that’s double uncertainty. And therefore, one way to deal with uncertainty is for Congress to make the tax cuts permanent.” Got that? Tax cuts that do not expire for two years, and which overwhelmingly flow toward those who are most able to afford expensive gas, are supposed to provide some kind of economic lift now, if only Bush could win the ideological fight over them with the Democratic Congress. Meanwhile, the subprime mortgage mess is transforming itself into what amounts to an overall credit crunch; even state and municipal governments are now having more difficulty borrowing. The dollar has fallen so much that at this point, its weakness is contributing in part to the recent run-up on international oil prices as speculators look to oil as a safer place to put their money. Wages, stagnant through nearly all of Bush’s tenure, have long since stopped keeping pace with the costs of such necessities as energy, health insurance and food. The financial pages warn almost daily of an economy that may be downshifting into a real crisis. But if past performance is to be a guide, Bush himself won’t go into crisis mode until it is way too late. His White House all but ignored the threats of a looming terrorist attack in the months before 9/11. The president’s response to the urgent entreaties from weather forecasters that a killer storm of potentially historic proportion was approaching the Gulf Coast was a shrug—and even after Katrina hit, Bush seemed to be clueless about the depth of devastation and human suffering. Terrorists and hurricanes strike quickly. Not so economic catastrophes that are months in the making, are foretold with reams of data from private markets and the government, and can even be seen in such prosaic symbols as the proliferation of foreclosure and auction signs along the roadways. The economic stimulus package the White House and Congress already agreed upon is fine as far as it goes. Millions of Americans who receive quick tax rebates undoubtedly will spend at least some money in ways that prop up the economy. But for at least seven years, the evidence of structural problems in the economy—wage stagnation and the rapid erosion of worker benefits such as health insurance and pension coverage—has been on full view. I don’t really want Bush driving around to gas stations or grocery stores just so that he can always have a ready answer to what-is-the-price-of questions. I want him to finally show he’s ready for the next crisis—the broad economic crisis—that is brewing on his watch. Marie Cocco’s e-mail address is mariecocco(at)washpost.com. © 2008, Washington Post Writers Group Previous item: What John McCain Should Know Next item: A Royal Blunder Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment
|
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved. |
By guntotinganglion, March 8, 2008 at 10:36 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
I guess, to my mind, a policy can be a crime, but not the other way around. That said, I could be wrong. There’s just too much “lightening” of the words surrounding the crimes of this regime. Failed policy presumes possible good intent…as in, we tried it, and it failed, but we really thought it would achieve an honorable goal. This was never the case with the Bushemada regime.
This has been a very carefully, very tightly controlled fraud, from the getgo. I tend to think, even the incompetence, while not exactly what you’d call planned, was twisted to their advantage…like the “disappearance” of tens of billions of dollars, which has been smokescreened by charges of incompetence. No…not incompetence in that particular incidence, more like taking advantage of the chaos that their incompetence has caused, which they say is what happens in war, like the term fog of war. But, it’s all fraud.
Elizabeth de la Vega has written about this, and she’s an expert on fraud, and it is her opinion that the entirety of this administrations actions, especially in, but not exclusive to, Iraq, are fraud, on an previously unrealized scale. This is what I feel after much reading and cross-referencing in my own mind.
On a related subject, I think, considering the bewildering inaction of the Congress in this regard, across the board, a lot of that “missing” money has gone to buy off virtually the entire Congress, and the Supreme Court and Justice Department. This may sound paranoid, but there’s been enough money disappeared to do this. 10 billion dollars would be enough to buy off everyone in the Congress. And that’s chicken feed compared to how much has been “spent” in Iraq…as in, even the moneys that weren’t “disappeared”, went into pockets that could be helpful in payoffs/bribes of this level. I also think, the possibility exists there may have been a handful that couldn’t be bought (I know…unlikely!). Those could easily have had the lives of themselves and their families threatened. Simply put, this regime is awash in hundreds of billions of dollars, and there are a lot of uses that money could be put to, that can be hidden behind “war costs”.
Call me paranoid. Just because you think they’re out to get you, doesn’t mean they’re not!
Report thisBy Douglas Chalmers, March 8, 2008 at 10:00 pm #
Well, you’ve got BOTH, haven’t you, guntotinganglion…...?!?!
Report thisBy Noz, March 6, 2008 at 11:01 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
You give Bush a break because he hasn’t driven for 7 years? Even my dad at 78 before he died - unable to walk, unable to see - knew what the price of fuel was.
What Bull are you feeding people? Bush is a complete pile of fecal matter who knows EXACTLY what is going on. Even after all this, you Americans are too freakin dumb to see he’s making fun of your collective asses.
Either you journalists/column writes are really stupid or you’re in on it with him…which is it? Neither is flattering but one of them is true.
Report thisBy guntotinganglion, March 6, 2008 at 9:22 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
I have to take exception to the term “failed policies”. When it’s a well planned, fully implemented CRIME, it doesn’t qualify as a policy when it fails. When it’s a crime from word GO, the term “policy” was used as a ruse to cover the fraud and homicide that was used to achieve the crime. Failed CRIME is more the proper term…although, since it is ongoing, even that is not accurate. It is, simply, a CRIME.
Report thisBy Douglas Chalmers, March 6, 2008 at 12:26 am #
The gas price is a function of the war price…...
The war is a function of a failing economy….
The economy is a function of failed policies, uhh.
Report thisBy rob, March 5, 2008 at 8:42 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
pond scum is more proactive
Report thisBy purplewolf, March 5, 2008 at 7:55 pm #
The business section of my local newspaper made the prediction of gasoline prices of $4.00 a gallon by spring on February 24,2008. That same week it stated that for the first time in 4 years that employers in America had to let people off their jobs in this country.
DO THEY REALLY BELIEVE THAN AND DO THEY THINK THAT AMERICANS ARE THAT STUPID?
Americans have lost more jobs in the last 7+ years than were created. Bush claims he made misc. number of jobs, yet fails to realize or state that for each job he takes credit for hundreds of others have been lost. The news article was another lie put out by this administration. I know lots of people who have lost their jobs, been downsized, business has closed, jobs relocated out of America and the jobs that may have been created often don’t pay enough or are only part time and not enough to provide for a family. Bush probably thinks no jobs have been lose in the last 4 years until this January also, along with $4.00 gas.
One reason I feel that Dole lost his bid for president years ago was when asked how much was a gallon of milk and a loaf of bread cost and how long would it take a person earning minimum wage to earn that, after taxes, he didn’t know. Repukes have always been out of touch with what real people live on $$ and reality wise. Dimmos are not much better sometimes also.
Report thisBy Bluestocking, March 5, 2008 at 6:58 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
I for one don’t see the fact that Bush hasn’t driven himself around for seven years or more to be enough of an excuse for not knowing about the rising costs of gasoline. Even though I have a valid driver’s license, I haven’t been behind the wheel of a car either in over ten years (it’s easy to do without a car here in New York City) yet I still manage to have a rough idea of the cost of gasoline—and I’m not someone upon whom the American people depend for leadership the way Bush is (or rather, who he is supposed to be). Granted, my schedule is not as full nor as stressful as Bush’s is and I have no doubt that he has a lot of balls in the air—but when the President of the United States shows that he has little or no concept of what the American people are paying for a basic necessity such as gasoline, it doesn’t put him in a good light. It makes him appear either ignorant or indifferent (or possibly even both) to the issues which are facing the American people—and if that’s the case, he’s not doing his job. If nothing else, is there no one on his staff who can keep him up-to-date with information such as this?
Report thisBy tigger, March 5, 2008 at 8:36 am #
GW Bush has his head in the sand when it comes to the US economy. Don’t let his idiotic comment pass by well i wasn’t aware of the gas prices going to 4$ a gallon. He knows….but all he knows more about is war and those politics…god forbid should he committ money to the US! I can hardly wait to see him out of office!
Report thisBy guntotinganglion, March 4, 2008 at 9:18 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Bush first said he didn’t know, then 4 minutes later, said he’d been too busy working on gas prices. How many times does he have to directly lie, to be called a liar? This wasn’t about his being complacent about record high oil prices, that’s a big duhh. This is about his endless dissembling, shifting blame to others, and out and out lying. Lying is of course, one of his truly inconsequential crimes, although it was his dependence on lying that got the Rape Of Iraq started. And that rape continues, because, as he likes to say, can’t “pull out” before we’re through. We haven’t cum yet…
This is the sickest bunch of miscreant proto-humans to ever walk the Earth. Lord High Inquisitor Bushemada is just the figurehead for a far more significant infection of the body politic, and the so called American “culture” as a whole. They are a virus. And as with so many virus’s, the victim often denies the problem till it’s too late, and the infection spreads to vital organs, like say, the Supreme Court, or the Legislature. And as is also typical of the virus, it kills itself in the end, out of it’s rapacious hunger for more…more or more…that’s it’s only goal, to get more.
Say your prayers children, maybe God is listening. If so, perhaps the fever will break, and the sun will come up again. We can always hope, even when it seems darkest…sometimes it’s darkest just before the end comes. Sometimes not. Good luck to us all.
Report thisBy samosamo, March 4, 2008 at 7:04 pm #
w knows exactly what is going on in the economy and especially with oil and gas. The prices are going higher and higher and the industries he has protected and helped to make RECORD PROFITS are just rolling in more and more profits everyday. What other absolutely direct evidence does any knuckle head need to prove that the corporations have set themselves aside from this country so as to keep the profits, loose the accountability and control the government the way they want it. How can anyone that is still ‘hooked, lined and sinkered’ by tv not realize that those ads by the energy companies are made to make the masses ‘think’ they ,the corporations, are compassionate and caring for the people of the USofA are just a pack of lies, crappy propaganda?
Report thisMaking people think they are busting their balls trying to come up with more and different kinds of energy to keep the people comfortable here in this country. Yet, no way in hell will they decide to cut their profits so people can afford to use their vehicles, heat their homes. $100 billion dollars profit is more important to those few over the needs of people hopelessly dependent on fuel for their lively hoods.
Any one got any suggestions?
By ocjim, March 4, 2008 at 4:09 pm #
We cannot afford anyone who is so clueless to represent us. To a great extent, the clueless Bush has - in effect - falsely represented the world in his lies, distortions, and suppressions of true global warming data, something impacting the whole globe. Too bad the rest of the world didn’t at least have part of a vote. We never would have had the plague Bush.
Report thisBy Sang Ze, March 4, 2008 at 3:16 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Let them eat cake!
Report thisBy Blackspeare, March 4, 2008 at 9:46 am #
$4 gas——no problem. Cars will become more fuel efficient and soon you will purchase gasoline by the quart. One dollar per quart is a nice round figure and sounds like the goal the gas companies were seeking unitl we have $5 gas, but that’s a nice round figure too——it has a ring to it!!!
Report thisBy Maani, March 4, 2008 at 8:08 am #
Cyrena:
In response to Marie’s comment (“His White House all but ignored the threats of a looming terrorist attack in the months before 9/11”), you said, “Well, he didnt really know anything, because his White House didnt ignore it, they helped PLAN it, and just didnt tell him.”
Actually, he DID know about it, as proven by his (perhaps accidental) statement that he saw (not just knew about) the first plane hit the north tower - which no one else who was not there personally could possibly have seen, since the first footage of that crash (by the Naudet Brothers) didn’t surface until a couple of days later. So he had to have seen it on some c/c tv or other device set up by the planners.
However, the planners (Cheney & Co.) only told him what he “needed to know” so that his “plausible deniability” could be maintained. This is also the reason why Bush refused to meet with the 9/11 Commission without Cheney there.
Peace.
Report thisBy Jim Yell, March 4, 2008 at 7:15 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Many people want to excuse Bush for his lack of concern and the consequences of the gangsterism he and Cheney have brought to the American government.
One might give him a pass for not knowing the cost of milk, but for crying out loud the mans fortune is in the petroleum industry and you are trying to tell me he doesn’t understand the consequences of this? Let us be honest Bush/Cheney have feathered their nests, that were already quite comfortable when they intruded themselves into the national scene and their apparent incompetence has greatly enlarged their personal fortunes. Don’t give Bush a pass on anything.
Report thisBy KISS, March 4, 2008 at 5:37 am #
Bush has demonstrated for eight years his inability to grasp the magnitude of the presidency and the ordeal of human strife. His association to reality is in the cartoons he watches on TV. He is no more in tune to what is real for Americans as my pet frog.
Report thisWith Reagan, Alzheimer’s was to blame, what blame will it be for Bush’s inadequacies? It was/is these inadequacies that gave Cheney and Rove the power they have.
By jackpine savage, March 4, 2008 at 5:02 am #
I don’t believe our Dear Leader on anything, especially this. He knows because he was instrumental in making it happen; he knows because all his buddies who are raking in billions because of it probably can’t help but talk about it when they get together.
The administration is only hoping that they can hold the economy together with string and sticking plaster until the next President takes office (i don’t think they’ve planned for a Republican President). They know that the American people are ignorant and gullible. They figure that if the worst of times come during a Democratic administration then the Democrats will get the blame.
All this, of course, assumes that Dear Leader plans to allow a peaceful transition of power. The other possibility is the worst of times happening before November and instigating all those new continuation of government plans that he’s put together so he can be “President for Life” of the Democratic People’s Republic of ‘Merica.
His plans are nearly complete…the fondest dreams that arise in the hissing laboratory of Dick Cheney’s wishes are near fruition. They can’t stop now, they’re almost there.
Report thisBy Larry Rainer, March 4, 2008 at 4:50 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
...the 2000 Bush commercial that showed gas prices spinning toward $4, and the ominous-voiced announcer telling us this is what would happen if Gore was elected?
Maybe Gore -did- win after all.
No, I wouldn’t blame the President normally for rising gas prices. But when it’s one who advertised that HE would keep them low, I will.
Report thisBy cyrena, March 4, 2008 at 12:29 am #
The financial pages warn almost daily of an economy that may be downshifting into a real crisis. But if past performance is to be a guide, Bush himself wont go into crisis mode until it is way too late.
Bush NEVER goes into crisis mode even when its way too late. For HIM, none of this is a crisis. When a crisis comes along, GW is likely to be reading to some 4th graders in Florida, (or were they retarded 5th graders wasnt the book something like My Pet Goat?) Come on thats kindergarten stuff. Or like his conference last week, hell do a slide show of his trip to Africa. What crisis?
His White House all but ignored the threats of a looming terrorist attack in the months before 9/11.
Well, he didnt really know anything, because his White House didnt ignore it, they helped PLAN it, and just didnt tell him.
The presidents response to the urgent entreaties from weather forecasters that a killer storm of potentially historic proportion was approaching the Gulf Coast was a shrugand even after Katrina hit, Bush seemed to be clueless about the depth of devastation and human suffering.
Marie, he wasnt so much clueless as CARE-less! IOW, he doesnt CARE about any of that human suffering, or the devastation, no matter what the depth!! By the time he got around to finally saying something public ally, 4 or 5 days after the hurricane hit, the very first thing he said, was this: Americans have GOT to understand that we have lost the capacity to produce gasoline. Yep, that was the first in the first paragraph of his speech, when he finally got around to addressing the nation, several days after Katrina.
THAT was the crisis for him, because at that point, he must have somehow imagined that there may have been some damage to all of the oil collection spots in the Gulf. There wasnt of course, but it was a good excuse for Halliburton, Exxon-Mobile, and the rest of his corporate dynasty to quadruple their billions in profit.
“....economic crisisthat is brewing on his watch.”
Actually, the economic crisis is brewing on his watch, because HE is the master brewer!! It has been his watch that has CREATED the economic crises. Its been brewing for over 7 years!!
And, its not like its an accident or poor planning. It was supposed to work this way. There is no economic crisis for his dynasty. He and his buddies are fine. Matter of fact, things have never been better!! Cheney moved all of Halliburtons stolen money to Dubai at least 2 years ago, and theres no reason to believe that all of the others havent done the same. Thats why GB doesnt have a clue about the price of gas. Theyve long since converted the stolen trillions to some other currency.
Nope no crisis here for GW, or his puppet masters, and nobody else even matters.
Report this