LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.Best Political Blog Winner, 2007 Webby Awards, People's Voice and Jury.   Dateline: Iraq - Anna Badkhen and Sarah Stillman on Assignment
 
May 18, 2008
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Reports

Arts & Culture

Digs
Inside the Data Mine

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Truthdig Bazaar
Unmasking Deep Throat

Unmasking Deep Throat

By John W. Dean
$15.00

more items

 
Reports

The Calm Before the Conflagration

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Feb 25, 2008
militants
AP photo

A member of a Sunni militia, left, guards two suspected al-Qaida members who were found in a home in central Baqouba, 35 miles northeast of Baghdad.

By Chris Hedges

The United States is funding and in many cases arming the three ethnic factions in Iraq—the Kurds, the Shiites and the Sunni Arabs. These factions rule over partitioned patches of Iraqi territory and brutally purge rival ethnic groups from their midst. Iraq no longer exists as a unified state. It is a series of heavily armed fiefdoms run by thugs, gangs, militias, radical Islamists and warlords who are often paid wages of $300 a month by the U.S. military. Iraq is Yugoslavia before the storm. It is a caldron of weapons, lawlessness, hate and criminality that is destined to implode. And the current U.S. policy, born of desperation and defeat, means that when Iraq goes up, the U.S. military will have to scurry like rats for cover.

The supporters of the war, from the Bush White House to Sen. John McCain, tout the surge as the magic solution. But the surge, which primarily deployed 30,000 troops in and around Baghdad, did little to thwart the sectarian violence. The decline in attacks began only when we bought off the Sunni Arabs. U.S. commanders in the bleak fall of 2006 had little choice. It was that or defeat. The steady rise in U.S. casualties, the massive car bombs that tore apart city squares in Baghdad and left hundreds dead, the brutal ethnic cleansing that was creating independent ethnic enclaves beyond our control throughout Iraq, the death squads that carried out mass executions and a central government that was as corrupt as it was impotent signaled catastrophic failure. 

The United States cut a deal with its Sunni Arab enemies. It would pay the former insurgents. It would allow them to arm and form military units and give them control of their ethnic enclaves. The Sunni Arabs, in exchange, would halt attacks on U.S. troops. The Sunni Arabs agreed. 

The U.S. is currently spending hundreds of millions of dollars to pay the monthly salaries of some 600,000 armed fighters in the three rival ethnic camps in Iraq. These fighters—Shiite, Kurd and Sunni Arab—are not only antagonistic but deeply unreliable allies. The Sunni Arab militias have replaced central government officials, including police, and taken over local administration and security in the pockets of Iraq under their control. They have no loyalty outside of their own ethnic community. Once the money runs out, or once they feel strong enough to make a thrust for power, the civil war in Iraq will accelerate with deadly speed. The tactic of money-for-peace failed in Afghanistan. The U.S. doled out funds and weapons to tribal groups in Afghanistan to buy their loyalty, but when the payments and weapons shipments ceased, the tribal groups headed back into the embrace of the Taliban. 

The Sunni Arab militias are known by a variety of names: the Iraqi Security Volunteers (ISVs), neighborhood watch groups, Concerned Local Citizens, Critical Infrastructure Security. The militias call themselves “sahwas" ("sahwa" being the Arabic word for awakening). There are now 80,000 militia fighters, nearly all Sunni Arabs, paid by the United States to control their squalid patches of Iraq. They are expected to reach 100,000. The Sunni Arab militias have more fighters under arms than the Shiite Mahdi Army and are about half the size of the feeble Iraqi army. The Sunni Awakening groups, which fly a yellow satin flag, are forming a political party.

The Sunni Arab militias, though they have ended attacks on U.S. forces, detest the Shiite-Kurdish government of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki and abhor the presence of U.S. troops on Iraqi soil. They take the money and the support with clenched teeth because with it they are able to build a renegade Sunni army, a third force inside Iraq, which they believe will make it possible to overthrow the central government. The Sunni Arabs, who make up about 40 percent of Iraq’s population, held most positions of power under Saddam Hussein. They dominated Iraq’s old officer corps. They made up its elite units, including the Republic Guard divisions and the Special Forces regiments. They controlled the intelligence agencies. There are several hundred thousand well-trained Sunni Arabs who lack only an organizational structure. We have now made the formation of this structure possible. These militias are the foundation for a deadlier insurgent force, one that will dwarf anything the United States faced in the past. The U.S. is arming, funding and equipping its own assassins. 

There have been isolated clashes that point to a looming conflagration. A Shiite-dominated unit of the regular army in the late summer of 2007 attacked a strong Sunni Arab force west of Baghdad. U.S. troops thrust themselves between the two factions. The enraged Shiites, thwarted in their attack, kidnapped relatives of the commander of the Sunni Arab force, and American negotiators had to plead frantically for their release. There have been scattered incidents like this one throughout Iraq.

If the U.S. begins, as promised, to withdraw troops, it will be harder to keep these antagonistic factions apart. The cease-fire by the radical Shiite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr, extended a few days ago, could collapse. And if that happens, a civil war, unlike anything U.S. forces have experienced in Iraq, will begin. Such a conflagration, with the potential to draw in neighboring states and lead to the dismemberment of Iraq, would be the final chapter of the worst foreign policy blunder in American history.

Email Newsletter

Get truth delivered to your inbox every week.

Previous item: Two Views on Nader's Candidacy

Next item: Playing Favorites

Jump to Comments

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

Comment Pages: «1 2

By Joe, February 25 at 11:47 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

ocjim- your comments remind me of the most disturbing aspect of the Bush Presidency: its failure to consider long-term effects of its actions. This applies to every policy or executive action, from demolishing the Alaskan wilderness in a drunken grope for oil to foreign relations to a failure to lead by example and ..the simple common sense to know when it’s time to stop what you are doing.

Reply to this | Report this

By ocjim, February 25 at 9:45 am #
(357 comments total)

Pick the most cynical, the most divisive route to achieving an existing agenda and the Bush thugs will take it. Divide and conquer has always been the approach of the Bush administration. It would rather destroy order, sanity, and unity than give up its control and power over any situation. If you expect this approach you will always know BushCo’s direction.

Reply to this | Hide 1 reply | Report this

By supersusie, February 25 at 12:32 pm #
(1 comments total)

Re:

Just testing

Reply to this | Report this

By lib in texas, February 25 at 9:17 am #
(293 comments total)

Google Ann Soetoro, Read all but Obamas

If we were as dedicated to getting GWB & Cheney charged with their crimes as we are to bringing down Hillary Clinton, those two would be in jail.  Unfortunately, our news media is not interested or maybe we are to blame as we don’t insist.
Another reason to maybe worry about Iraq and Obama is even tho he says he is a christian His father was Muslim, his stepfather was Muslim and Obama did go to mosque tho infrequently.  Since he has converted to another religion he is called a “murtadd” and according to their law he now must be executed.  I can sure see him visiting Iraq, Iran, and Pakistan.

Reply to this | Report this

By G.Anderson, February 25 at 7:20 am #
(249 comments total)

A fool and his money are soon parted.

It’s no coincidence, that we’re paying for cooperation in Iraq. Cause that’s what we do here isn’t? It’s just our style.

Isn’t Washington run by lobbyists payoffs, and the rest of the country by pork?

We have an administration that has hung a for sale sign on everything, from Tax Rebates to re enlistments.

But what happents when the moneys all been spent?
In America we have an infintie Army of greedy lawyers to enforce the fine print, but in Iraq, when the money’s gone it’s back to bullets.

Reply to this | Report this

By Hammo, February 25 at 6:55 am #
(372 comments total)

Iraq mess, Obama and Clinton

The invasion and occupation of Iraq is still a major concern of Americans, despite worries about the coming recession or depression.

The Bush administration has created a mess (and committed crimes?) and they will now hand it to others.

This also impacts the Obama-Clinton contest.

Food for thought in the article ...

Voters may be focusing on the stark contrast of Obama and Clinton on the invasion and occupation of Iraq by the Bush administration ... which is sinking Clinton in the polls and primary voting.

And, voters may be getting past a candidate like Obama whose dad was African.

Food for thought in the article ...

“Obama’s Iraq position, mixed ethnicity are key factors”

AmericanChronicle.com
February 22, 2008

http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/53128

Reply to this | Report this

By Conservative Yankee, February 25 at 6:49 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

There’s a history here which most seem to miss. Folks might wish to Scroogle Iran’s “Mohammad Mosaddeq” “Operation Ajax” “Treaty of Sèvres”

those really interested might wish to get a copy of Vanityfair’s “

“Iraq’s Mercenary King”

Reply to this | Report this

By troublesum, February 25 at 6:38 am #
(317 comments total)

How much of the $100 billion a year cost of the war is going to the insurgents?  There are still people in New Orleans who have no place to live more than three years after Katrina.  The Bush administration is currupt beyond all imagining.

Reply to this | Hide 1 reply | Report this

By Non Credo, February 26 at 7:03 pm #
(1148 comments total)

Re:

Well and truly said.

Reply to this | Report this
Comment Pages: «1 2

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox

Privacy Policy

 
Click here to advertise with Truthdig
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
Robert Scheer's new book offers first-hand insight into the presidential mind
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2008 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.