  |
 |
| |
|
|
|
 The Poppy ProblemPosted on Feb 21, 2008By Marie Cocco WASHINGTON—Pakistani elections have reduced to rubble the Bush administration’s policy of supporting strongman Pervez Musharraf as the first, last and only bulwark against the terrorists who flourish under his nose. Neither unstinting political support nor billions in American aid ever resulted in the promised crackdown against the threat. With Pakistan undergoing an uncertain political transition, Afghanistan next door provides an opportunity to make quicker and potentially more dramatic progress against what has been an unrelenting slide into violence, insecurity and corruption. The United States and its allies must rethink their failing effort to stanch the trade in illegal poppies, the Afghan bumper crop that finances the resurgent Taliban and terrorist groups in the region. It will not come easily because the Bush administration is convinced the current strategy of eradicating crops—plowing them under before a harvest and trying to convince farmers to grow legitimate products—is working. But there is limited evidence of that. Thomas Schweich, the State Department’s coordinator for counternarcotics and justice reform in Afghanistan, boasts that the $600,000 a year eradication program has eliminated 8 percent or 9 percent of the Afghan poppy crop. As a measure of success, he points to a new U.N. report that says poppy “cultivation levels will be broadly similar to, perhaps slightly lower than, last year’s record harvest.” The same report, however, says the “total amount of opium being harvested remains shockingly high.” And it is increasingly concentrated in the lawless southern provinces, where security is so poor that the Taliban has re-established its control, warlords rule villages with impunity, terrorists infiltrate easily—and where eradication efforts haven’t really begun because of the danger. “This year, they have force protection,” Schweich says. “They will go in to eradicate.” The outlook for what happens after that is cloudy. The U.N. reported in its current survey of Afghan poppy cultivation that of 206 villages that planted opium for harvest this year, 62 percent had done so in spite of eradication measures taken in 2007. “The experience of eradication in 2007 was not a strong factor in influencing the decision at the village level whether or not to grow opium poppy in 2008,” the U.N. says. What emerges after two years of pumping money into an effort to eliminate poppy production is, at best, an uneven record. Poppy production has been curtailed in some regions, but seems to have become concentrated precisely where it is most dangerous to American interests. In these insecure regions, there is little, if any, distinction between Pakistan and Afghanistan. “Southern Afghanistan is commercially Pakistan,” says Norine McDonald, the lead field researcher in Afghanistan for the Senlis Council, an international think tank with three field offices in Afghanistan. “There is no border control. It doesn’t exist. The bad actors from Pakistan are moving clearly back and forth with insurgents, weapons and opium. It’s all one problem.” After the terrorist attacks of 9/11, the United States and its allies sought to block the flow of money to terrorists through sweeping new banking requirements and broad surveillance of international financial transactions. Now we leave the equivalent of a pot of cash at the terrorists’ doorstep. The Senlis Council recommends an abrupt change of course. It envisions pilot projects in which farmers could grow poppies for medicinal use—say, for morphine—with the opium immediately refined into pharmaceutical form at small village manufacturing sites so that raw crops don’t get smuggled. McDonald says the United States backed this approach a generation ago, using aid to help convert opium production in both Turkey and India for medical use. Schweich scoffs at the idea as “beyond ridiculous,” mostly on economic grounds. Such projects, he says, would produce a “narco-welfare state” that would operate with government subsidy indefinitely. Still, the idea has gained tentative interest elsewhere. Both the European Parliament and the Manley Commission, an independent panel that assessed the outlook in Afghanistan for the Canadian government, have said the medicinal approach deserves at least a look. More of the same is almost sure to result in more of the same. Schweich says that eradicating poppy crops in the crucial southern provinces may take 10 more years. And that is an awfully long time to leave that pot of cash on the terrorists’ doorstep. Marie Cocco’s e-mail address is mariecocco(at)washpost.com. © 2008, Washington Post Writers Group Previous item: Why Obama Owes Women Next item: A Trade Transformation Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.
By freeyourmind, February 27 at 10:19 am # The drug trade restored by the US puppet regime! While oil and oil pipelines out of the Caspian sea basin were undoubtedly a factor, the bombing of Afghanistan also served to restore the multi billion drug trade, which is protected by the CIA. Immediately following the installation of the US puppet government under Prime Minister Hamid Kharzai, opium production soared, regaining its historic levels. According to the UNDCP, opium cultivation increased by 657% in 2002(in relation to its 2001 level) In the immediate wake of September 11, the price of opium in Afghanistan increased three-fold. By early 2002, the price was almost ten times higher than in the year 2000. Its called the Afghan Golden Crescent drug trade and it represents approximately one third of the worldwide annual turnover of narcotics. The UN estimates about 500 billion a year.
By Sang Ze, February 24 at 4:40 pm # Poppies are good for you. Poppies will stimulate your economy, among other things.
By Bill Blackolive, February 24 at 8:41 am # Certainly, illicit drugs making more money than anything else in the world, the US governing must keep their fingers in. At least for a couple decades cocaine brings in more revenue than oil, and pot is the best money crop US of A. Now we are so international etc. These and other secrets are old, old secrets kept from the average US citizen. I am thinking, when the 9/11 coverup gets into main US media, many old histories on many matters will bubble up.
By laughoutloud, February 21 at 8:31 pm # go deeperi’m amazed that people haven’t caught on, after decades of the ‘war on drugs’, that the US has been implicit in the global drug trade. is it a coincidence that after the US went into afghanistan, their opium went from supplying an estimated 60% of the worlds opium to 90% today? go pick up a book called ‘the politics of heroin’ wake up people.
By laughoutloud, February 21 at 11:59 pm # Re: Re: go deeperone can hope. the question is will the powers that be allow that to happen? the ‘war on drugs’ costs tax payers millions upon millions of dollars per year, and a lot of that money is going to srms manufacturers who are as entrenched in policy making as the policy makers themselves benause they pay a lot of money to be there. its going to take, i think, much more than just barack obama to eliminate the ‘war on drugs’, but one can hope.
By Sally A. Bridges, February 21 at 3:20 am # Just like eradicating the illegal drug trade from Mexico to the United States--it AIN"T gonna happen!! Add Your Comment |
|
UN Envoy Heads to Burma with Urgent Relief Message
Email
Print
Share
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Ma.gnolia
Newsvine
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Yahoo
Jump to Comments
Bazaar|Podcast|About Us|Contact Us|User Agreement|Privacy Policy|Comment Policy
Copyright © 2008 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.
COMMENT TOOLS:
Hide comments
Show comments
Comment on this article