|
|||
|
Tortured SemanticsPosted on Feb 8, 2008WASHINGTON—With its larger-than-life characters and head-spinning plot twists, the presidential campaign is easily the best reality show on television: Will Barack Obama find a way to connect with Latino voters? Can John McCain somehow mollify all those angry conservatives? Could Hillary Clinton, after raising more than $100 million, run out of money? The drama is so compelling that it’s easy to lose sight of why this election is so important. This week, George W. Bush reminded us how grievously he has wounded our nation’s ideals, values and standing in the world—and how big a challenge the next president will face in repairing the damage. On Tuesday, authorized by the White House, CIA Director Michael Hayden gave Congress the fullest account so far of the CIA’s use of waterboarding, which the administration calls an “interrogation technique” but which international agreements—and plain English—call torture. Think about that. Did you ever imagine that we would have a president who uses legalistic euphemisms and craven rationalizations to justify strapping prisoners down and subjecting them to simulated drowning? A president who claims the right to use waterboarding, and God knows what other “techniques,” in the future if he wants? This is a moral outrage, people. At least, it should be. There simply cannot be any kind of pro-and-con debate over the use of torture—whatever anodyne phrase you hide it behind—by agents of the United States government on persons in custody. Torture is not debatable. It is forbidden by U.S. and international law. It is a vile implement used by tinhorn despots, not by the elected leaders of great democracies. Advertisement I’m sure the CIA extracted some truth as a result of these waterboarding sessions. But I’m also sure the questioners came away with falsehoods, exaggerations and fantasies. I believe the many professional interrogators who say there are better ways of getting useful information out of uncooperative subjects. Is waterboarding really torture? In describing the practice, Director of National Intelligence Mike McConnell said this recently to The New Yorker: “If I had water draining into my nose, oh God, I just can’t imagine how painful! Whether it’s torture by anybody else’s definition, for me it would be torture.” McConnell subsequently clarified his remarks, maintaining that “the United States does not engage in torture. We do use enhanced interrogation techniques.” That’s what this whole sickening exercise in semantics is about: covering the administration’s backside. Waterboarding has been around for a long time, and it has always been considered torture. If the practice were legal, the CIA wouldn’t have destroyed its videotapes of waterboarding sessions. CIA officials worried at the time about possible legal exposure, not just for the agents who did the waterboarding but for the whole chain of command. That chain begins at the White House, where Bush takes the position that waterboarding is perfectly legal, even though it is currently banned, and that it could be used again if deemed necessary. To acknowledge the truth would be to admit that crimes were committed; those crimes would have to be investigated, the perpetrators would have to be charged, and, yes, people might have to go to jail—unless Bush gives absolution, as he leaves office, in the form of a pardon. Both of the leading Democratic candidates, Clinton and Obama, pledge to renew our government’s absolute prohibition against torture. So does the Republican front-runner, McCain, who has been much more forthright on the issue than his GOP opponents. McCain experienced torture as a prisoner of war in Vietnam; he is passionate about this issue and knows it is a matter of right and wrong, with no gray area between. On torture and all the other excesses—arbitrary detention, electronic surveillance, Guantanamo—the next president should feel obliged to give a full accounting of the Bush administration’s disgraceful transgressions. Then he or she will begin the task of assuring the world that such things will not happen again. Eugene Robinson’s e-mail address is eugenerobinson(at)washpost.com. © 2008, Washington Post Writers Group CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment |
By lawlessone, February 13, 2008 at 10:10 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
There is nothing wrong with Bush and his dungeon masters that a good impeachment boarding wouldn’t cure.
Report thisBy Conservative Yankee, February 13, 2008 at 6:21 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Dr. Lawrence failed to mention in all the dictatorships above “CITIZEN participation” was critical in order to secure power.
Ben Franklin’s quote, oft repeated lately;
“Those who would trade liberty for a little security, deserve neither Liberty nor security.”
AND we here, the smart, educated, self-assured, white collar, folks of privilege, KNOW people always get the fate they deserve….
Right?
I(>;D
Report thisBy Mark Shepherd, February 12, 2008 at 5:04 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Please no more of the damned if you don’t/do - negative hyperbole bullshit. So tired of this argument of the lesser of two evils.
Maybe if we all think positive and take some sort of action - positive change can happen. Instead of bitching and crying about even the possibility!
Report thisBy whyzowl, February 12, 2008 at 11:44 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
“Over the course of human history, movements have arisen to counter the degradation and soul destruction that can be visited upon peoples by men imbued with the will to power. At the most elementary level, the animating force that propels these movements can be described as: Love.” I’m very loosely paraphrasing Joseph Campbell here, and my point is simply that love is the answer, that it has always been the answer. It is not naive, or delusional, or infantile to put one’s faith in love, for the extent to which we suffer and are complicit in promoting the suffering of others is directly proportional to our lack of faith in the power of love. Love does not fail; rather, we fail it. And isn’t love, ultimately, the animating idea behind socialism? Why devise a socio-economic system that gives a damn about the common man if not for love? Isn’t the alternative adherence to the “law of intensification,” as Campbell put it, or “greed for more than one’s share?” Along with, of course, the belief that the most efficacious means to achieve the satisfaction of one’s animal wants is through violence and coercion, in one form or another?
Report thisBy i,Q, February 12, 2008 at 5:38 am Link to this comment
We should all stop paying our taxes and instead send notifications to the IRS and to Congress stating that “Payment has been suspended for failure to meet contractual obligations.”
Report thisBy i,Q, February 12, 2008 at 5:20 am Link to this comment
...but with a computer, obviously. Well, “there” is only a ten minute drive from here.
While your description sounds unnervingly Brokeback, i was thinking more along the lines of writing more letters to your representatives and calling out your friends when they say politics is for wonks. Watching at least as much C-SPAN as porn. Getting involved in local government even though meeting in committee doesn’t really suit the average leftist personality type. Hanging out with Kucinich and his hot wife around the hollowed out tree where he stores his nuts for the winter. Helping Mike Gravel toss his rocks in the pond. Skinny dipping with 100,000 other pissed off but otherwise peaceful citizens in the reflecting pool underneath the Washington Monument. Doing something other than just chanting “Yes we can!” when Obama asks us to see that “We are who we’ve been waiting for.”
Report thisBy i,Q, February 12, 2008 at 4:52 am Link to this comment
If we all suck so much, maybe you should go out there and start a proper political party, be the guy we can rally around. Or you could make pipe bombs and really show those spineless centrists what it means to lack spine.
Report thisBy whyzowl, February 12, 2008 at 12:05 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
In my estimation, Obama is an image, a pure PR/media concoction, a blank slate upon which many Americans have projected their desperate hopes and deepest, heartfelt longings. But what really lurks behind that image? Do you really think, as so many of Hillary’s supporters seem to of her, that his warmongering statements, his reluctance to condemn the use of torture, and his failure to decry the Bush administration’s myriad assaults on our human rights and our Constitutional system are just all part of a clever electoral feint? That he’s “just saying what he has to say to get elected?” But that, once he’s in there, he’ll rip off that hideous, duplicitous mask and fight for everything you believe in and want him to care about? Better think again, my friend. He wasn’t pre-selected for us by the Establishment because they expect him to rattle their gilded cage. Quite the contrary. Look at the list of his presidential advisers-to-be, read his major foreign policy pronouncements, and consider the length of the list of the crying—no, screeching—needs in this country that he has failed to address, and a cold shudder should run up your spine. Maybe he might be fractionally better than Hillary, and maybe not. You’ll never know until it’s too late.
Report thisBy archeon of thrace, February 11, 2008 at 11:10 pm Link to this comment
it could be that some of us at least, participate because we are actually seeking discussion and dialogue. Discussion and dialogue that may be hard for us to find were ever we live and work. We may be seeking to clarify our own views, we may be seeking answers to questions, etc.
No, this is not “action” nor does it change anything, except that is changes us. This may lead us to actually undertake action, for some it may simply get us to get out and vote, we may even convince others to join us.
Sometimes the journey to discovery must take us through a period of nihilism and anger.
Besides, sitting in your room alone stewing in your own thoughts is not healthy! And it does not move ideas forward.
Just my two bits….
Report thisBy Tony Wicher, February 11, 2008 at 8:37 pm Link to this comment
Re By whyzowl, February 11 at 11:34 am
Foolish me, I am hoping Obama actually believes in democracy, human rights, constitutional law and international law. I also think he believes in negotiation and diplomacy and that he is very good at them.
Where is the left? I’m right here, supporting Obama.
Report thisBy archeon of thrace, February 11, 2008 at 3:30 pm Link to this comment
Hear, Hear!
Truer words have been rarely spoken!
In a democracy all are responcible for the actions of their government.
I am ashamed, for even as a Canadian, I must bear the guilt of the torture, even we don’t demand an end to the detentions and renditions. Even my country allows it’s own citizens to be sent off to third nations to be tortured.
IF the Germans and Japanese were guilty so are we.
Report thisBy whyzowl, February 11, 2008 at 11:34 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
All I know is, Yeats’ vision is becoming our reality, as in America today, truly, “the best lack all conviction, while the worst are filled with passionate intensity.” We’re in the midst of a powerful right-wing resurgence that isn’t satisfied just to roll back the New Deal-era reforms and eliminate the American middle class, but is clearly attempting to roll back the Enlightenment itself and even the crown jewel of classical liberalism: the Magna Carta. And where is the organized resistance to this rollback? You don’t have to be a Marxist or Leninist-Trotskyite to wonder, “Where is the left?” If you can’t get behind the candidacy of a mild, center-left reformist fighting in the precise manner of Thomas Paine to defend classical liberal values, like Dennis Kuchinich, then who are you and what the hell do you think you are fighting for? More cheeseburgers? Obama promises four more years of the Clintonesque “politics of nothing,” and who can say they have any idea what, if anything, he really believes in or is willing to fight for? These ARE the times that try men’s souls, and I fear we’re not up to the task.
Report thisBy Mark Shepherd, February 11, 2008 at 10:57 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I do not believe the Democrats are complicit in leading the nation to war…the Neocon agenda, The Bush Admin lead us by lying to Congress and the public, we were all deceived. This is where accountability should somehow play a part?? Yes, they Democrats agreed but I don’t think the leadership of this country thought about Americans, they were purely acting on their own corporate interests, disaster capitalism - Government = Profit from War - I think that is the current equation?
How to we as American voters separate corporate greed and government? Former CEOs as president / vice presidents, cabinet officials? Why do we continue to VOTE them into office. Why don’t third parties ever rise above this mess? I think it has something to do with money, corporate media and American interests mixed with fear/fascism.
Report thisBy Tony Wicher, February 11, 2008 at 7:39 am Link to this comment
Have you ever read V.I. Lenin’s “Left Wing Communism, a Infantile Disorder?” You sound like on of those people Lenin is talking about. Kucinich supporters and others farther to the left have marginalized themselves with their insistence on ideological purity. They don’t understand the nature of democracy, and by alienating themselves they are playing right into the hands of the Right. I’m a democratic socialist and internationalist myself. But I feel that with Obama I have a “place at the table”, that my voice is being heard, even though it is by far the only one. That is all anyone can ask for in a democracy. In politics one never gets 100% of what one wants. Politics is always a choice between real alternatives. Obama is the best real alternative available in this concrete situation.
Report thisBy Expat, February 11, 2008 at 6:59 am Link to this comment
I hope you weren’t expecting an argument from me on this. I love Kucinich; he was my guy. But the reality is; that for whatever reason, the masses didnt flock to him. However, I think you are far too general in your overall condemnation of “liberals”, and “on the left”. I’m not even sure what all of that means. But, since you quoted me, I’ll say this: In general, it seems the posters here seem to think that, by the mere act of posting, they are actually doing something in the world at large; I dispute that unequivocally! They are not, and that was in fact my point precisely! Blogging for most of us is a feel good experience because we get a vicarious experience as though we actually make a difference. I think we dont (make much of a difference). Its like punching a bowl of liquid cornstarch. One hits it; but the energy is dissipated completely. The value of us posting is this; we are involved in an information exchange and it would be a grave error to think this has no value. It is one of the few freedoms available to us. Thats why I continue to post. There are many people here who are not happy and maybe feel a bit powerless; were trying to figure it out. I will conclude: Action, sorely lacking in a meaningful way, may now show itself in the way we vote. This is the last thing left to us. Cynicism is healthy, nihilism is not. As the song said; theres no good guys, theres no bad guys, we just disagree. Thats okay.
Report thisSabai, sabai be calm, be calm
By redhound, February 10, 2008 at 5:53 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Tony-All Americans share in the conplicity of US policy. We just need to be more active in promoting democracy in our own country and being more active in electing candidates that are anti-war.
Report thisBy whyzowl, February 10, 2008 at 5:14 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
For all practical purposes, an authentic American left doesn’t exist. “Liberals,” or “progressives” as they now call themselves, are hollow, hypocritical, bourgeois poseurs who only pretend to be “on the left” politically, probably to assuage their guilt over the fact that they fully and enthusiastically support a cruel and barbaric American-led Western imperialist system that visits deprivation and destruction upon the same peoples whose fate they claim to care about so very, very deeply.
Look, when given a chance to vote for a candidate who actually is on the left politically, and not very far to the left at that, Dennis Kuchinich, they didn’t. They marginalize, ignore, ridicule or betray any real American leftist who dares try to raise his or her issues in THEIR party, lest their right wing party bosses snarl at them. The Democratic Party is not, by any stretch of the imagination, a left party. If it were, it wouldn’t be trying to crucify Kuchinich to serve as an example to others.
Report thisBy Tony Wicher, February 10, 2008 at 4:06 pm Link to this comment
Sure, Mark - the Democrats voted for the war because of political calculation and cowardice. They are complicit in this administration’s crimes, starting with Hillary Clinton. That’s why impleachment is “off the table”, even though it is so richly deserved.
Report thisBy drogue, February 10, 2008 at 3:40 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
YES, I have read this and as a concerned citizen I feel powerless even hopeless knowing a new president in office will change very little in regards to Corporatism, a policy that capitalizes on disasters - as we can see economies now THRIVE in the midst of endless disaster, it is now something that friedman’s shock therapy actually seeks to gain from - ? How can we move forward with this sort of moral value in the world. Profit ruling each decision!?
sad state of affairs, much of the research Naomi Klien is doing rings true to me…
http://www.naomiklein.org/articles/2008/01/why-right-loves-disaster
Report thisBy Maani, February 10, 2008 at 3:13 pm Link to this comment
Cyrena:
After studying the regimes of Hitler, Mussolini, Franco, Suharto and Pinochet, Dr. Lawrence Britt came to believe that there were 14 steps in creating fascism. It truly is frightening how many of them the U.S. has already taken:
1. Powerful and continuing nationalism
2. Disdain for the recognition of human rights
3. Identification of an enemy or scapegoat as a unifying cause
4. Supremacy of the military
5. Rampant sexism
6. Controlled mass media
7. Obsession with national security
8. Religion and government intertwined
9. Corporate power protected
10. Labor power suppressed
11. Disdain for intellectuals and the arts
12. Obsession with crime and punishment
13. Rampant cronyism and corruption
14. Fraudulent elections
The reason why the masses don’t stop this process is because at each step the government uses fear and propaganda to both keep people from seeing what is happening, and to reinforce the people’s “comfort” with these changes in the name of “safety and security.” The “paternalism” of government, especially when re-inforced by propaganda, is an enormously powerful palliative for the masses. Not only do they not FIGHT it, they come to both accept and WANT it. [“There was nothing left in them except sorrow for what they had done, and love of Big Brother. It was touching to see how they loved Big Brother.” George Orwell, 1984.]
How do you wake up the masses when they happily accept the idea of a national ID card, leading to a “Your papers, please” society, and gleefully accept the implantation of trackable RFID chips in their arms?
Your guess is as good as mine.
Peace.
Report thisBy dick, February 10, 2008 at 1:42 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
If there is a worst form of torture, it was devised by Christianity in the 7th century, and practiced, with approval by the church authorities ,for many centuries.It was torture of the mentally sick. Never do men do evil so cheerfully and completely as when they do it from religious conviction.
Report thisBy Gary Sargent, February 10, 2008 at 12:01 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
If charged the administration would argue:
1) US Law prohibits torture.
thus 2) The US does not engage in torture.
but 3) The POTUS approves of waterboarding.
therefore 4) Waterboarding is not torture.
Anyone who accepts this reasoning needs, at the least, an introductory course in logic.
Report thisBy Mark Shepherd, February 10, 2008 at 11:44 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Why isn’t this administration being held accountable - or judged by the Dems during this campaign - milatary spending, torture, fabricated wars, why?? I do not understand - the amount of crimes that have taken place - international crimes!
Report thisWhat is happening?? Can anyone answer this?
By GB, February 10, 2008 at 8:38 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Torture is already in the Republican play book. If the Democrats don’t start hearings on the impeachment of Cheney right away and forget about if Lieberman is giong to stop caucusing with them, we will have a Republican president in ‘08 bomb bomb bombing Iran and sending the dollar to its grave while Bush and Cheney are rolling around on the billions they stole and living it up Paraguay with complete security.
Report thisBy GrammaConcept, February 9, 2008 at 8:31 pm Link to this comment
Mr. Robinson
Thank You.
Report thisBy GrammaConcept, February 9, 2008 at 8:30 pm Link to this comment
If you are used to flying by flapping your wings, and now that way doesn’t work anymore, please then consider attempting to swim through the air…
As we think, so we become.
Report thisBy cyrena, February 9, 2008 at 3:48 pm Link to this comment
CY, this is absolutely horrible, and I believe every word, including the fact that you were fired because of it. Same thing happened to me. Having the courage to come forward to expose this stuff is almost guaranteed to cause you a life of misery and grief.
I call it “The Afterlife of a Whistle Blower”.
Check out this interview with Daniel Ellsberg….It’s very powerful. Really…brings up a lot of emotion.
Anyway, the link to the video is just below the lead-in text…
Revealing Deliberate Deceptions: A Truthout Interview With Daniel Ellsberg
By Sari Gelzer
t r u t h o u t | Interview
Monday 04 February 2008
Daniel Ellsberg, perhaps the country’s most famous whistleblower, fears that before the Bush administration leaves office they will try to attack Iran.
Indeed, Ellsberg’s argument gained merit as George W. Bush increased his rhetoric against Iran when he delivered his final State of the Union Address. Bush accused Iran of training militia extremists in Iraq, and emphasized the US will confront its enemies.
In a wide-ranging interview with Truthout, Ellsberg uses insight from his experience as a Pentagon analyst under the Lyndon B. Johnson, and later, the Nixon administration, to discuss Bush’s plans to begin a war with Iran, the role of the press to give whistleblowers exposure, and how American democracy can be restored.
“That was not my finest hour that I look back on. That was something that I am ashamed of,” he tells me, with a heavy heart.
Ellsberg wishes he spoke out against the Vietnam War sooner. As a civilian working for the government, he says his oath was always to the Constitution and he violated that oath until the day he decided to leak the Pentagon Papers in 1971, to reveal the war was unlawful.
Ellsberg now spends his time ardently encouraging and supporting whistleblowers to come forward when they see constitutional violations. He emphasizes the importance of documents as evidence, and of timeliness, so lies are exposed before an actual war occurs.
Early this year, Ellsberg experienced deja vu when the white house and a complicit media portrayed an incident in the Strait of Hormuz that deeply paralleled the Tonkin Gulf Incident of 1964.
The Gulf of Tonkin Incident was an alleged attack by North Vietnamese ships upon American boats. As a result of this alleged aggression, Congress passed the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, which gave former President Johnson the permission to expand the Vietnam War.
The recent incident involving Iran alleged serious threats were being made to US ships by Iranian speedboats. Within days of the events in the Straight of Hormuz, information revealed the details of the entire event had been fabricated. Ellsberg sees promise in the quickness of this revelation because, in contrast, it was only in 2005 and 2008 the inaccuracies and deceptions of the Gulf of Tonkin incident were revealed by the declassification of National Security Administration reports.
Ellsberg is worried Congress has not put forth an effort to demand they be informed before an attack on Iran should occur. Currently, there is a Senate resolution to demand Congress be consulted in the event of plans to attack Iran, but it has not gotten out of committee.
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/020408A.shtml
Report thisBy jackpine savage, February 9, 2008 at 3:29 pm Link to this comment
well said, well said!
And so the question becomes, how do we translate our intellectual activity into physical/political activity?
I sure do like the idea of 100 million strong group of Americans politely asking for what is rightfully theirs back. I also fear that the “government” would say, “Well, ok, we already robbed it of its value…so there you go.”
Report thisBy jackpine savage, February 9, 2008 at 3:25 pm Link to this comment
Whoa…well, i, um, yeah…that pretty much sums it up for me.
Report thisBy jackpine savage, February 9, 2008 at 3:23 pm Link to this comment
Yup.
Report thisBy ironfelixhumour, February 9, 2008 at 2:42 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
i,Q,...
hey how about this for action:
wanna go and find some broken down log cabin (or build our own) in some remote backward place, near a stream, grow some organic veggies, few chickies, a horse, maybe some geese, and of course dogs! make our own moonshine, enjoy watching the sunrise and sunset, with a glass of red wine. Off the grid (i love candles) forget the computers and such stuff….. we can practice our massage and aroma therapy aromatic skills.. read each other classics and wrestle-ponder the mysteries, sleep under the stars in the front yard, play strip poker in the moonlight…
maybe in some remote region in siberia lots of space there—not sure, maybe you could find space in wyoming to go ‘native’.....
how would that sound like for ‘action’?
send the word buddy, where i have to meet you, and we can hit the road, to find our little logcabin in the middle of nowhere….
Report thisBy cwhipps, February 9, 2008 at 1:05 pm Link to this comment
As always, Eugene, you’ve brouht the picture into sharp focus. But, I wish I could believe that Hillary would end torture.
We all know that Bill Clinton created the practice of “extrordinary rendition” in his term, and that he supported, along with Hillary, the invasion of Iraq. Those two facts preclude my trusting that either can make good policy or lead from an understanding of priciple.
Just their unscrupulous performance in South Carolina is enough to convince me that they will do anything to maintain a political advantage. (it was torture just to watch it all unfold)
Yes, we need more than semantics to put America back on course, and accountability is the prescription for what ails us.
But, this sickness isn’t reserved to only members of the GOP. Sadly, it’s alive and well in the representatives of the corporate and global elite that reside within our own Democratic party.
Obama is the only one who can turn things around for our party, and our country.
Report thisBy Don Stivers, February 9, 2008 at 11:59 am Link to this comment
It’s taken 7 years to figure Bush out?
And what about those prosecuted for crimes committed at Abu Ghraib Prison in Iraq?
And our front runners want to put this whole torture thing behind us? Is there no justice for those who ordered the torture?
And if Bush pardons those who carried out his orders, they are not punished? Were not the Japanese and Germans and our own commanders who were responsible for torture punished regardless of a “pardon”? Some things cannot be pardoned. Ask those that were hung after Nuremberg.
Report thisBy desertdude, February 9, 2008 at 10:23 am Link to this comment
as the President for the torture that has been committed. It was done in every Americans name on orders of the President. SHAME ON US ALL!
Report thisBy Conservative Yankee, February 9, 2008 at 6:20 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
When I was still a youth, I went to work for the State of New Hampshire at their reform school (called, at the time, “The Manchester State Industrial School”) When I was there the place held children aged 10 to 18 for committing various offences, but since there were no children from wealthy families, I suspected these children’s greatest crime was to be born poor in New Hampshire.
There were a great many punishments at MSIS they made children who wet their beds wear their wet pajamas to breakfast and sit at the “baby table” they made children who talked after lights out “duck walk” around the yard sometimes for hours. They handcuffed uncooperative children to their bed springs after having removed the mattress, but the torture I referred to is so reminiscent of “water boarding” I thought I’d mention it here. This punishment, reserved for children who attempted escape, involved shackling legs together, then two burley “guards” would turn the child upside down and hang them by the legs from the shower head in the wash-bay. Then they would turn on the water. They child would choke and gag, and beg to be released, this usually occured in a three part event where the water was turned off until the child caught his breath, then turned back on. The screams reverberated off the tiled walls and throughout the “cottage” (I was working King cottage at the time.) the guards left the bathroom door open so the other children could hear….a warning.
I reported this behavior and lost my job… which I would have lost anyway. I wrote to Thomas McIntyre who was New Hampshire’s Democratic US Senator…his response was to write my boss and tell him he had an “coddler” working in his facility. The Boss, Mr. Adams, took great delight in reading me McIntyre’s letter when he fired me.
Funny, how the world has changed… Wonder if it has changed as much in King Cottage?
Report thisBy Expat, February 9, 2008 at 5:36 am Link to this comment
^ price we pay for allowing a bunch of criminals to usurp the executive branch of our government. Tortured Semantics has been going on for 7 years and counting. I agree there should be a full accounting/reckoning; but who has the courage to do this. Without this accounting/reckoning we will forever suffer degradation in the eyes of the word. We will never again be looked to for guidance and relief from tyranny; because we are the worst tyrants extant. The next administration I am sure will want to put this all behind us, and get on with the future, but, there will never be a future for us until this is reckoned. I hope the world will never forget because for many years we were the hope of the world..
Report thisBy Expat, February 9, 2008 at 3:02 am Link to this comment
^ at a women’s forum, rolled her eyes and said something to the effect, “who’d have ever thought”. This was in reference to her son, the standing president. A telling moment.
Report thisBy Expat, February 9, 2008 at 2:08 am Link to this comment
^ list of posters who have said the very same thing in only a slightly different way. We fail to understand action. We mistake this thing we do for action. It’s just one of a number of our fatal flaws.
Report thisBy i,Q, February 8, 2008 at 11:21 pm Link to this comment
...and critical thinking skills diminish, and lives are lived too fat rationalizing luxury as necessity. No conscience or conscious work adds to the value of our lives because our jobs are so arcane and far removed from our natural disposition. Disposable society and celebrity media culture, and isolation from neighbors compound our isolation despite our massive cities. Add to that the anonymous opinion slinging and name calling and downright self-important pseudo-intellectual self justification which the internet provides, falsely satisfying the need to be a part of something bigger than the self, but in reality lacking the quality of action required to make a movement a movement. Just thinking a thing and blogging it doesn’t get us off the hook. The passion of action has been milked from our culture because it is too easy to remain on the path of least resistance or we are told that it costs too much to get there, or that it won’t make a difference even if we did show up 100 million strong on the steps of our government demanding that our representatives represent. We are a nation of infants, supplicants to the teat of power, self deluded on the vanity that our national identity entitles us to the mantle of “Greatest Nation.”
This is how it is done, stripping from us our power: replace our minds with guns and missiles, then prey upon the ignorant pride which remains in our hollowed out husks. This is Reagan’s legacy, and this is the Neocon triumph, and it must be overcome.
Report thisBy cyrena, February 8, 2008 at 10:33 pm Link to this comment
This is a much appreciated piece from Mr. Robinson, even though some of the words seem to rise verbatim from pages of own research/writing too many years running now. Who would have ever thought that I would someday spend hours of academic research on the topic of TORTURE? What could there possibly have been able to say about it, when Eugene has stated the obvious the practice of torture is NOT a debatable topic. Its wrong, and its illegal, and thats that.
Still Ive long ago reached the same conclusion that Mr. Robinson puts forth here so clearly. This legalese and tortured semantics, (now thats a nifty term; describes many of the comments on these forums, and I could easily name the most frequent authors) is all about covering the administrations legal and criminal asses. Especially Cheney, since hes the one who has argued so forcefully and passionately in favor of ALL torture tactics. (not just the water boarding).
I remember specifically about a year ago maybe longer, when he was so passionate about making sure the CIA could continue the humiliating and degrading sexual abuse tactics. It made me physically ill to hear him argue so strongly for those. How much more sadistic is that, than the worst of the worst sociopaths? Actually, NONE. A sexual sadist is pretty much the bottom of the barrel of sociopathic slime at least as scummy if not more, than those who would molest children. And this fucking pervert is the Vice President of the United States; for all intents and purposes the Dictator of the US, because we all know that his power far succeeds that of the moron, who is puppet-in-chief and president in name only.
So, there we have it a perverted sadist as the most powerful person in the country, maybe even the world. How did we ever fall this far into depravity? How did we let it happen? I admit I dont know. Still trying to figure it out.
Only recently have I begun to grasp some insight (though its intellectually challenging) by studying the same experience of Hitlers Nazi Germany. How did it happen? (that millions of people could be summarily tortured and exterminated). WHY did it happen? Why didnt the people of Germany DO anything, to stop it? What do WE need to do to stop it? Obviously the LAWS dont matter.
Those are questions we should all be asking ourselves, and each other. Im not sure of ALL the answers, but I think we should ALL be asking the questions.
Report this