![]() ![]() |
![]() |
| |
|
The Stimulus SwindlePosted on Jan 24, 2008By David Sirota Stimulus—you’ve probably heard this nebulous, scientific-sounding word this week. Every politician suddenly wants economic “stimulus,” and wants you to think this “stimulus” is unequivocally good. But here’s the question: Why are we talking about “stimulus” only now? After all, most people have been hurting for quite a while. Paychecks have been stagnating, foreclosures have become commonplace, health care premiums continue their double-digit increases—and up until recently, conservatives greeted such hardships with saccharine fantasy. Following government reports showing a surge in income inequality, Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson last year gushed that the economy is “as strong as I have seen it in any time.” In the summer, as the housing crisis exploded, President Bush said the economy was “thriving.” This month, as the Labor Department reported another drop in wages, Republican Rep. Michele Bachmann of Minnesota said not to worry, her state is doing just great because “we have more people that are working longer hours, we have people that are working two jobs.” And with word that there are now 195,000 homeless veterans nationwide, Bill O’Reilly insisted on Fox News that really, “there’s not many [homeless veterans] out there.” Message: Nothing to see here. The economy is fabulous. Move along. Lately, though, the rhetoric has switched. Paulson now says there is an “urgent need” for action, and President Bush is demanding a “stimulus” package from Congress. And that gets us back to the critical question: Why the sudden shift? Because the group demanding help has changed. Before, it was just commoners complaining—regular homeowners, wage earners, troops coming home from Iraq, you know, the 99 percent of us who can’t afford the thousand-dollar-a-plate political fundraisers. But now Wall Street is panicking. In the last month, the financial industry’s profit margins dropped, thanks to mortgage defaults brought on by irresponsible lending. And when the corporate executives who underwrite campaigns start whining, politicians develop “stimulus” schemes using the blight of layoffs, foreclosures and wage cuts to justify tax cuts for those doing the laying off, foreclosing and wage cutting. Specifically, most GOP presidential candidates are demanding corporate tax cuts as the “stimulus” to improve American competitiveness, ignoring a recent Treasury Department report noting that the United States already has among the lowest effective corporate tax rates in the developed world. Republicans like John McCain, fresh off a Merrill Lynch fundraiser, say we need not expand unemployment benefits and food stamps to help workers and give the economy a reliable Keynesian boost. No, they say we must hand over more cash to the same financial industry that just gave its executives $39 billion worth of year-end bonuses. Leading figures of both parties seem eager to help limit the debate over “stimulus” and make the final package a corporate goodie bag. According to the Washington Post, Democratic Sen. Max Baucus of Montana asked economists affiliated with the Hamilton Project—a Citigroup-backed think tank—to testify to Congress at its initial hearings on a stimulus package. Labor economists, by contrast, were not invited. You might think Citigroup’s central role in creating the current financial crisis would disqualify it from influencing legislation addressing that crisis. But remember, Citigroup gives lavishly to Democratic politicians and pays Democratic financier Bob Rubin roughly $10 million a year as a top executive. Not surprisingly, congressional Democrats appear poised to support a package stripped of increases in safety-net programs and comprised primarily of business tax cuts. This, even though experts agree the former would have an immediate economic impact and the latter will take at least six months to hit. As usual, We the People are told to wait patiently as moneyed interests claim their latest gift from Washington. President Bush is undoubtedly pleased. He said he wanted “stimulus” built primarily on tax cuts and no new public investment—more proof of his desire to win the Most Out of Touch President title from Herbert Hoover (at least Hoover proposed new infrastructure with the tax cuts he claimed would prevent the Great Depression). Let’s be clear: There’s nothing inherently bad about Washington interacting with Big Business, and nothing wrong with “stimulus” as a concept. But as this recession intensifies, there’s a big problem with politicians catering exclusively to Big Business and an even bigger problem with converting “stimulus” into yet another code word for “swindle.” David Sirota is a best-selling author whose newest book, “The Uprising,” will be released in June. He is a fellow at the Campaign for America’s Future and a board member of the Progressive States Network, both nonpartisan organizations. © 2008 Creators Syndicate Inc. Previous item: Message From Third Place Next item: The End of Privacy Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.
By Conservative Yankee, January 31 at 11:23 am # By zeitgeist, January 30 at 2:09 pm # Who Is a Jew? The Orthodox rabbinate in Israel, who sets policy on matters regarding the law of return, insists that every person invoking the law of return to enter Israel as a citizen undergo genetic testing. The Israeli government maintains a large computerized registry of demic maps obtained from the genomes of Jews from various parts of the world. Whenever an immigrant arrives, a tissue sample is taken and the genetic material from the cells is used to cross-check claims of Jewish identity with the deme maps in the registry. By examining the X chromosome, it is possible to identify markers that show whether a man did or did not have a “Jewish” mother or is of Jewish matrilineal descent. Getting information at Truth-dig is equivalent to getting nourishment at McDonald’s… The post by zeitgeist above is an out&out;lie, and in fact, many folks allowed into Israel are not “ethnic” but religious Jews. There is no gene for Catholicism!
By Conservative Yankee, January 29 at 6:07 am # Citizenship in IsraelMy atheist (formerly Quaker) cousin lives in Israel with her Catholic children (from a previous marriage) She is now married to a Jewish man. She tells me that The Israeli people are far nicer to her than her old friends who followed her husband out the door. Oh, BTW the children attend Catholic mass in near-by Tel Aviv. Jerusalem, now considered part of Israel is peopled by Muslims Christians and Jews. While I do not support Israel’s expansionist policies, or Her Faustian relationship with the USA, statements like this help no one. Finally to seek asylum in Israel all one must do is claim they are a Jew… no papers necessary.
By Big D, January 27 at 4:36 pm # Just goes to show, the power is inOkay… so the big boys are getting worried that you’re not spending your money fast enough to keep them afloat. Next we are going to have to eat a diet that is dictated by these big strapping intelligent creative lying corporations. Then we’ll have to watch only the information “they” want us to know about. And then we will have to have our sex lives dictated by “them”. And then we will only be able to vote for who “they” decide we should. And then.... oh nuts… too late. Each penny you spend controls the future. If you don’t like the picture painted, then think about EVERY penny you spend. Cancel your subscription to the propaganda. Buy / borrow books that are about educating the public to this tragedy. Consider where you will get your food and how it affects your health. Find a local farmer and give him/her the support that the “big boys” are demanding. You might disagree with me on this, but in this day and age, your money has more say than your vote. Maybe it’s time for everybody to consider their spending as seriously as they consider their vote. Remember that it was the post 911 cry to “spend money” to save the country and economy.
By David Sirota, January 27 at 8:38 pm # Re: Pardon Me!!!Your comment is disgusting - for you to presume to know anything about me is nauseating, to say the least. You have no idea what shoes I have walked in - and I won’t bore you with my story. Because really, that’s not the point - the point is change. Attacking the messenger for having the wrong message is one thing. Attacking the messenger for having the right message but supposedly not “having walked in your shoes” is so conceited and self-centered it is laughable.
By Montelee, January 27 at 11:04 am # 20 million retires No Rebate ?? China20 million retires who would spend it on the grandkids and buy food, gets No Rebate. Is this FAIR??
By GB, January 27 at 8:13 am # Pay-OffThe only political clout Cheney and Bush have and had came from 911, an event they allowed to happen. As time slips by they want us to forget all their crimes by sending out chump change to an economy they destroyed by illegally invading Iraq. I guess the Dems got much bigger checks because since 2006 they’ve done virtually nothing to stop the insanity. The Dems also let the media eat up the real voice of reason which is Dennis Kucinich who had the guts to act on accountability from our run amuck government.
By Conservative Yankee, January 27 at 7:38 am # At the risk of being a lightening rod, the American people who earn less that $199,000 a year deserve the government and system which they have served and supported. They bought the lies, the tooth-fairy logic, and the pyramid-scheme underpinnings of our capitalist system. Like a chronic loser ia a Vegas crap table, we are now about to throw the dice again… Mc Cain, Romney, Clinton, Obama, Edwards, Huckabee, all in the pocket of corporate entities. So do we once again win a small hand which will allow us to pay for a ticket home? Can we sell enough of what we have collected to pay some of the bills? do we once again buy the endless rhetoric of “It was all GWB...but I can do better?” (I remember when it was all LBJ’s fault, All RMN’s Fault and all Jimmy Carter’s fault.... wonder if we get to skate again.... or if this time we fall through the ice… It’s not the personalities.... the SYSTEM is inherently flawed.
By bogi666, January 27 at 7:36 am # Tax stimulusForeign aid to Israel is $500 for each Israeli which has been continuous for 30 or 40 years and legislation increased it for the next 10 years, or $5000 for each Israeli. Some American taxpayers will get a one time $600 stimulus payment, The CORPORATE WELFARE KINGS will reap a government bailout of some sort whether they pay taxes or not. In fact CORPORATE WELFARE goes to those companies that are losing money and not paying taxes. Furthermore, companies that lose money can recover taxes they paid 3 years previously, as can individuals, and subtract current years losses against future income for a total of 10 years of not paying taxes, if you have the right CPA’s.
By Sally A. Bridges, January 27 at 1:03 am # Pardon me while I throw-up.The article is RIGHT-ON, but I’m sick of pundits saying that there is nothing inherently wrong with Washington interacting with Big Business. Interacting, in this case, IS inherently wrong. It’s like the Fox and the Bear raiding the hen house and raping the chickens. The only stimulus here is enjoyed by the two former players. In this case, the chickens never “come home to roost.” Meanwhile, the Fox and the Bear sit around licking their chops waiting for the next easy raid. Pardon me while I throw up.
By DennisD, January 26 at 4:02 pm # Reganomics ReduxThe trickle down theory is once again in evidence. The rich are pissing on the middle class and poor and congratulating themselves on their aim.
By Tap Duncan, January 26 at 1:04 pm # More BS from Shrub & Co.The GOP pretends to believe, or rather purports to believe that the gov’t should NOT help the people by interfering in their lives. They think that interfering is things like food stamps, unemployment, social security, etc. BUT, it’s ok to “Interfere” with big businesses’ lives. That means it’s ok to bail out big business, but screw the common folk. Now, we as Americans are supposed to accept a plan to borrow money, give it away, and leave the payback to a generation that hasn’t even been born yet. When will people realize that the GOP means Grand Old Party (Cronies), not Gov’t. of the People. There is no gov’t. of the people anymore. Just money hungry dirtballs. We’re getting raped, and we’re not even complaining about it, sound screwed up to me.
By RHONDA, January 26 at 7:00 am # TAX REBATE? BUSH WILL JUSTSo how about giving some to those people who cannot work? I live on Social Security Disability. I inherited a disabling disease through no fault of my own. I worked and paid into the system, but after 20 years, poverty is opressive. I have no financial future. I can´t earn even a meager wage. Hey, what about the poor seniors who worked all their lives? What about the millions of children in poverty? We all have expenses and could use a little stimulus. If Bush believed people should be able to keep their money, then huge banks and corporations would pay their share of taxes. It´s just another lie. We the People on the low end of the economic scale have known for a very long time how lousy the economy is. Middleclass are just beginning to get uncomfortable. BUT LOOK WHAT HAPPENS when Wall Street starts to complain!
By Margaret Currey, January 25 at 4:43 pm # The stimilus package is just the old shell game, the governor of Oregon said to really help the people extend unemployment or give more to people to receive food stamps, the seniors got a small amount of increase (2.3) in the mean time the cost of medication has gone up as well as the price of food and seniors are just stuck. I hope that congress just remembers that it is the seniors who do the most voting and maybe they will think before plunging this country into more and more dept. Who will pick up the pieces when social security is no more and HUD will scrap their program. Do we all put our heads between our legs and hope that things look better that way?
By Gary Rosenblum, January 25 at 1:19 pm # When Frogs JumpIf you want to fool people who don’t know any better, you can claim you can make a dead frog jump. Hook up electrodes and supply a jolt of electricity and supply a “stimulus”. Fools will be delighted. If you want to fool people who don’t know any better, you can make a dead economy jump (in time for election season.) You hook up business with a billion dollar jolt in windfall tax breaks while instructing the media to only talk about who gets cash. Fools will be delighted.
By nation in crisis, January 25 at 11:13 am # There are many ways to betray one’s country, and driving it into financial ruin ranks among the worst.
By GW=MCHammered, January 25 at 10:15 am # Real Economic StimulusI favor Ron Paul’s economic stimulus package: As for the silly rebate, I’ll spend mine aiding dissent of the current Anti-American regime. And just as in ‘07, proud to divest in Bu$hCo’s Amerika in ‘08!
By GW=MCHammered, January 25 at 8:22 am # Anti-American and Criminal“Let’s be clear: There’s nothing inherently bad about Washington interacting with Big Business, and nothing wrong with “stimulus” as a concept.” That should read: Let’s be clear: Washington bedded in full intercourse with Big Business is absolutely wrong! Government’s job is to stimulate ever-greater freedom and economic growth for the American People. Any Other Aim Is Anti-American and Criminal. G-Damn Money Funnelers!
By Jim Yell, January 25 at 6:22 am # don't a suckerWe are at WAR, so says George Bush and being that we are at WAR it makes anything Bush wants sacred and patriotic. What was practically his first advise to the nation after 9/11 “get back in the stores and spend your money!” Now we have a huge debt and for the first time in the nations history a war without a war tax. As one comentator mentioned the previous efforts to give a jump start to the economy came so late that people had already adjusted, or the economy had adjusted without intervention. Given our huge debt and no program to service said debt, we don’t have the money to give to the rich or to the poor beyond the day to day social programs that keep food on the table and a roof over peoples heads. THERE IS NO MONEY TO GIVE BACK. It is a fiction to make it look like G.W. and the republicans care, they don’t. It is a fiction to make the democratic enablers of the criminal Bush/Cheney administration look like they care. They don’t.
By bogi666, January 27 at 12:04 pm # Re: socialismIt’s socialism for the rich and capitalism for the working classes, or trickle down. Add Your Comment |
COMMENT TOOLS:
Hide comments
Show comments
Comment on this article