LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.Best Political Blog Winner, 2007 Webby Awards, People's Voice and Jury.   Maggie Award Winning Truthdig Book Reviews
 
May 18, 2008
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Reports

Arts & Culture

Digs
Inside the Data Mine

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Reports

One True Voice on the Trail

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Jan 7, 2008
Kucinich
AP photo / Jim Cole

By Chris Hedges

This article was originally published by The Philadelphia Inquirer.

I am tired of living in a country where 16-year-old girls die because insurance company profits are more important than human life.

I am tired of a government that runs offshore penal colonies where the detained are tortured and denied the basic protections of the Geneva Convention.

I am tired of living in a state that makes war against countries that do not threaten us.

I am tired of watching basic constitutional rights, such as the right to privacy, taken away from citizens.

Most of all, I am tired of being told every four years that I must vote for candidates who do nothing to stop the brutal and callous assault by corporations on the American working class, sending their jobs overseas and stripping workers of benefits and human dignity.

And so—to be sure that this year my vote goes to someone who does more than pay lip service to the moral and physical deterioration of the nation—I will pull the lever for Dennis Kucinich.

I can hear the collective groan. He won’t win. He has no real following. It is a wasted vote.

But this is the groan of the comfortable, those who have health insurance and a decent job. This is the groan of those who can send their kids to expensive colleges and probably went to one. The groans of the poor in this country, including the increasingly impoverished working class, are no longer audible to most of us. Their lives have been rendered invisible, of little interest to the advertisers who sell us products on television or take out full-page color ads in the newspapers and glossy magazines. And when the corporations write you off in America, everyone else does, too.

Any vote is wasted that does not address the terrible injustices being done to tens of millions of people who have lost the opportunity to earn a living wage. Any vote is wasted that does not, even if it ends up being a protest vote, attempt to halt our transformation into an oligarchic state where a tiny, privileged elite controls our money and our politics.

The irony and tragedy of the Kucinich candidacy is that, in many ways, he is proclaiming the failure of his own party. Again and again, he says what his party should be, but no longer is. He has championed democratic freedoms and defended the interests of the working class, from which he comes, for decades. He was alone among the major candidates to vote against the Patriot Act, against authorizing the war in Iraq, and he wants to repeal the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and withdraw from the World Trade Organization (WTO).

He has called for the impeachment of the vice president and public financing for elections. If you compare his voting record with that of any of the other major candidates, he is the only one who has steadfastly remained free from corporate control.

I went to see Kucinich in Washington. I asked him during a two-hour interview why the Democratic Party has failed so badly. Why did the party, despite the midterm elections, refuse to cut funding for a war that is probably the worst foreign-policy blunder in U.S. history?

“Lack of commitment to democratic principles,” he said after a long pause. He then began to list the reasons: “No understanding of the period of history we are in ... unwillingness to assert congressional authority in key areas which makes the people’s house paramount to protecting democracy; the institutionalized influence of corporate America through the Democratic Leadership Council.

“Oil runs our politics, corrupt Wall Street interests run our politics, insurance companies run our politics, arms manufacturers run our politics, and the public’s interests are being strangled,” he added.

He stands as a maverick within the party, denouncing the series of trade agreements, many put in place by Bill Clinton, which have devastated U.S. workers.

“What I see is that the Democratic Party abandoned working people and paradoxically they are the ones who hoist the flag of workers every two and four years, only to engender excitement and then turn around and abandon the same constituency. This is now on a level of a practiced ritual.”

Kucinich advocates a full-employment economy, calling for a new version of the 1930s Works Progress Administration (WPA), which employed millions of Americans. He wants to put people to work to rebuild the country’s crumbling infrastructure, from its roads and bridges to its dams, levies, sewer systems, libraries and mass transit. He has introduced, along with Republican Rep. Steven LaTourette of Ohio, a bill, H.R. 3400, that would provide federal funds for this jobs program. He has called for the government to invest in wind and solar technologies to be retrofitted into tens of millions of U.S. homes and businesses.

Kucinich is the only candidate in the race who advocates a single, not-for-profit health-care system for all citizens, in essence a national Medicare. He coauthored H.R. 676, which would provide universal health coverage. This coverage would, he said, not only assure that people will not suffer or die from lack of medical care, but would also stem the epidemic of personal bankruptcies, half of which are attributed to people who cannot pay their medical bills.

He rails against his party’s refusal to end the war, blaming the Democrats’ decision to continue funding the war on “an implicit understanding of the power of those interests that profit from war and the power of war as an idea.”

I asked him if he was ever frustrated, given his lonely status as an outsider. He was excluded from a Dec. 13 Democratic debate in Iowa sponsored by the Des Moines Register. His lack of corporate money has seen his campaign subsist on $2 million while Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama each raised $100 million in 2007 for their presidential bids.

“What you do in life is you stand up and fight for those things you believe in,” he said, “and you do it without question or pause, to take a phrase in one of my favorite songs. I don’t have any complaints.”

Email Newsletter

Get truth delivered to your inbox every week.

Previous item: A Conversation With Dennis Kucinich

Next item: The Battleground of New Hampshire

Jump to Comments

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

Comment Pages: «1 2

By progressivepam, January 7 at 3:46 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Well, here we are, a

Well, here we are, a year into the campaign, and when he is fully marginalized, Truth Dig finally covers Dennis as though they were not part of the problem.  It is reprehensible that not only was MSM refusing any coverage of Mr. Kucinich, so was a good portion of the alternative media on the left, whose message is supposedly so much like Dennis’.

Thanks, Mr. Scheer, for giving us such articles about Dennis way after they would have been affective.

Reply to this | Report this

By Timothy1119, January 7 at 12:28 pm #
(6 comments total)

Work and Build a movement

And stop whining because no one votes for you yet because you have not been successful in building a movement.  No one in the media took Hukabee seriously until he started winning.  So go and do likewise.  Find a formula for success and get some movement in the polls.  Work and build a bloody movement and stop concocting idiotic conspiracy theories on how it is the media do not take you seriously.  The media goes where THERE IS A STORY.  Dennis K, I am sorry to have to inform you, is a story that relatively few are interested in.  He has had a year or more to build an organization in Iowa & NH, and still hardly anyone supports him.  That is not the fault of the news media.  Ron Paul is also a story that relatively few are interested in...although seemingly about half the callers on C-Span support Ron Paul. 

Hukabee is living proof that there is no media conspiracy to silence lesser known candidates. The media will be at your door when you can demonstrate that people will be voting for you in large numbers on Election Day.  Getting to that point is your own responsibility.

Reply to this | Report this

By Bill Blackolive, January 7 at 12:18 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

yes

Cyrena can fill in blanks but the jackoffs are straight ahead, toot toot.  I doubt anything will be clear till we gang up ferociously. The 9/11 coverup is the most wondrous route.

Reply to this | Report this

By Paul, January 7 at 12:07 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

It is not a conspiracy

I am a wee bit tired of Kucinich supporters’ complaints about the lack of respect accorded his candidacy.  Senator Joe Biden, with actual credentials for the Presidency, was more thoroughly marginalized in this year’s campaign.  The reason (aside from the media’s fascination with a story line)?  Gravitas.  Rep. Kucinich lacks it, Sen. Biden lacks it, Gov. Richardson lacks it, Rep. Paul lacks it (and some marbles as well).

It is not Rep. Kucinich’s message that is his downfall (with the exception of a single payer health-care proposal, and UFO sightings) John Edwards has co-opted many of his themes this year and has made real progress in confronting American corporatocracy.  Mr. Edwards has captured the spirit of the American electorate’s impotence in the face of the corporate sponsored torpor that has gripped us.  In comparison, Mr. Kucinich sounds shrill and extreme even where his positions are not extreme.

Reply to this | Hide 1 reply | Report this

By fsuthai, January 9 at 12:21 pm #
(14 comments total)

Re: It is not a conspiracy

“It is not a conspiracy”...my ass!  Which corporate payroll are you own?  Hey, ‘unregistered’ Paul, you are obviously one of the “dirty tricks” composers.  Just count yourself as an ineffective & exposed ‘shill’ for the status quo set.

Reply to this | Report this

By loveinatub, January 7 at 12:02 pm #
(81 comments total)

Thank you, Mr. Hedges...but a little late!

I appreciate your fine words describing your support for Kucinich. But why didn’t you write this piece last year?? Why didn’t you write at the start of 2007 when Kucinich was just starting out??

Yes, you are the voice of the comfortable and too many comfortable people want to remain “comfortable” and only come out when it their voice won’t add much weight to the political debate anymore.

Mr. Hedges, you should have been writing effusively in your praise of Mr. Kucinich all throughout 2007. And then I’d read your column and think a bit better of you.

Reply to this | Report this

By Bubba, January 7 at 11:07 am #
(45 comments total)

Tiring of realities is not vrituous

Dennis is not going to win. We’ve all known it from the start. None of us is so unrealistic as to think Dennis has even a prayer of winning.

But Dennis has never run to win. He would be a colossal fool to run to win when he, and everybody else, knows he won’t. So, why is he running?

Set aside any possible, inappropriate, self-serving, etc. reasons for the moment, and let’s look only at the possible, appropriate, comunity-serving, etc. ones. I’d suggest he runs to get his message across, and in that he has some success. I’d also suggest he runs to “influence the debate,” and that this is important. And I would imagine that there must be any number of other good reasons he runs. For any or all of these good reasons, I understand why you would entertain the prospect of actually ~voting~—not merely singing his praises or giving him a pat on the back, but ~voting~—for Dennis.

But what if your vote turns out to be another instance of “the perfect being the enemy of the good”? What if your vote for Dennis, “the perfect,” cancels my vote for, let’s say, Obama, “the good,” and that you and I get Hillary, let alone Mitt or John, as a result? What then?

You begin your article with some things you’re tired of. I’m tired of them, too. But I’m also tired of people getting so tired that they’re willing to cancel my vote for the “good” with their vote for the “perfect.”

To govern, you need the agreement of the governed. If you’re a democrat, you get agreement in a democratic manner, turn it into votes, get elected, and govern. If you’re a dictator, you get agreement in ways other than democratic, turn it into votes or don’t, get elected or don’t, and govern.

As to Dennis, what is widely agreed upon is that he’s not to be taken seriously as a presidential candidate. As it happens, Dennis, himself, is unwilling, demonstrably as well as by his own admission, to do what it might take to become a credible candidate. I don’t mean compromise; I mean getting serious about creating a third party or some other organised mass movement to move forward his platform.

Dennis may remain best known for the contradiction between his expressed willingness and claimed ability to govern, and his expressed unwillingness and apparent inability to do what is necessary to govern.

Government changes as a result of what the governors and the governed do before and after elections. Government rarely changes because of elections, and when it does, most of that change evaporates rather quickly.

The truly “perfect” will never be elected until it is within the imagination, reach and desire of the many. Even then it will have to be demanded.

In the meantime, we have the candidates we have. If they’re not our personal wish list, then we have work to do between elections.

Voting is not wishing. It’s not about the choices we would like to have. It’s our choice of the candidates we do have.

A vote is one of the most precious coins of a democracy. If it’s spent in return for nothing, we make ours worthless and those of others’ worth less.

All of us tire of realities now and then. It’s not something to tout as though it were virtuous or a virtuous justification for what one might do next. Tiring of realities is merely childish. So, now that you’ve had your childish rant, get up off the floor and go vote for Obama.

The more I learn, the more I think again. His foreign-policy advisors, for example, include half a dozen of the most meritorious entries in the Who’s Who of Warmongers. But, hey, what else should I have expected?

What I would like to think I can expect, if and when he’s elected, is an Obama with a quite different cast of characters. I’d like to think he really does has the potential to make, and to encourage others to make, significant change.

Reply to this | Hide 2 replies | Report this

By fsuthai, January 9 at 12:44 pm #
(14 comments total)

Re: Tiring of realities is not vrituous

Dream on, Bubba! You are assuming there are some “good” candidates that can make it to the nomination and that voting for Kucinich (the “perfect") is a wasted vote that might cancel your vote for one of those “good” ones.  Well, think again and examine closely.  None of those you mentioned, even Obama, are going to change the status quo; except maybe Ron Paul and, if Kucinich doesn’t get on my Nov. ballot, I’d vote for Ron just to get rid of the IRS.  Some of his other ideas might cause total chaos but would be preferable to the slow death of all individual rights under our current political status. Just my opinion, of course. 
VOTE KUCINICH

Reply to this | Report this

By Tim Hollis, January 9 at 10:39 am #
(5 comments total)

Re: Tiring of realities is not vrituous

Kucinich can’t win? Don’t bet on it.

Reply to this | Report this

By Conservative Yankee, January 7 at 10:20 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

By cyrena, January 7 at

By cyrena, January 7 at 5:30 am

“For instance, Texas, (Ron Paul’s state) is falling apart at the seams in its own infrastructure, because Texas does not collect a state income tax, to provide for these things, within their own state. So, they frequently resort to TOLLS, say for bridges.”

Educate me.... Why should someone who lives within the State of Texas But who has no car, be forced to pay for a bridge?

Roads should be paid for by the people who use them, No?

Reply to this | Hide 1 reply | Report this

By cyrena, January 9 at 5:36 am #
(4172 comments total)

Re: By cyrena, January 7 at

Cy,

Yep, I get your point, and so I would direct you the the last response that I posted to Joe.

But, I wasn’t necessarily speaking of people WITHOUT cars, or without ACCESS to cars. I was speaking of those who might have them, but cannot afford the additional cost of the tolls, especially if they need to use the toll roads everyday, to get to and from work.

And, while it may not sound like a big deal, I should say that Texas is probably the among the lowest earning state in the nation, at least for mimimum wage workers. The salaries (overall) are much lower than I suspect they are in your state, (though I don’t know much at all about Maine). But, without a doubt, the salaries are low, for unskilled or semi-skilled laborers, and the tolls are actually high.

As with everything, it helps if you can buy a pass say once a year, and you save a lot of money that way. But, like everything else, you have to HAVE the money, to be able to do that. In reality, it doesn’t play out that way for the person at the bottom of the wage scale. So, by the time one has paid their car note, insurance, gas, maintenance, AND the tolls, (which at the time I lived there, could add up to $5 or $6 a day) you’ve really cut into whatever little bit of money you might be earning. Now of course if there was a state income tax, those charges could be written into your return, and you’d pay your fair amount of the tax, based on your income.

And, it’s not like there are alternative roads, or available public transit. Public transit would make all of the difference of course, but they don’t wanna pay for that either, so they don’t have it.

So, I said all of that to say that in the end, what it does is to basically eliminate a substantial portion of the population, and not just in things like toll roads, or toll bridges, but it has farther reaching effects that the average person doesn’t really give a lot of thought to.

Still, this isn’t really a new sort of phenomena, as far as what it does to create such socio-economic imbalances. It’s pretty much the same thing as say, having enough money at one time, to take advantage of bulk prices, or sale prices. Far better to buy 10 cans of soup at one time, when you can get them for say 75 cents a can, than to pay $1.39 for the same can of soup, just because you didn’t have any more than that, and you didn’t have ANY money when they were on sale.

Kind of the same principle. If you don’t have even that extra $5 or $6 dollars a day to deal with the tolls, then it might prevent you from getting whatever employment might be available. Well, not MIGHT...I’ve seen it happen. I mean, how many days can you not show up for work, because you didn’t have the money to pay your toll for the road to get there?

Reply to this | Report this

By hetzer, January 7 at 9:37 am #
(167 comments total)

OCJIM Understands the Con

We are completely surrounded by Nazi media, government, commerce, military, and propaganda, Etc.  RESISTANCE IS FUTILE IF YOU HOPE TO BE SAVED BY TOTALLY CORRUPT INSTITUTIONS.  The filth will keep this up until all of us will envy the dead.

Reply to this | Hide 1 reply | Report this

By cyrena, January 7 at 11:43 am #
(4172 comments total)

Re: OCJIM Understands the Con

Real encouraging there hetzer...and I think most of know the con. (or at least the one that’s been most at work for the longest period of time).

Thing is though, I’m not ready to start hanging out at the cemetary, just to be jealous of the residents there.

So, something’s gotta give on the filth, and I’m not opposed to getting some new brooms and mops, and using them.

Reply to this | Report this

By GW=MCHammered, January 7 at 9:17 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Frankly, the more a candidate

Frankly, the more a candidate is celebritized by the media, the less likely I am to vote for them. We must elect candidates on government changing policies. Parties and media be damned! And I’m tired of living the American Lie too:

“Much American consumption is wasteful and contributes little or nothing to quality of life. For example, per capita oil consumption in Western Europe is about half of ours, yet Western Europe’s standard of living is higher by any reasonable criterion, including life expectancy, health, infant mortality, access to medical care, financial security after retirement, vacation time, quality of public schools and support for the arts. Ask yourself whether Americans’ wasteful use of gasoline contributes positively to any of those measures.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/02/opinion/02diamond.ht ml?ei=5087&em;=&en=6f044fea2e97c0b9&ex=1199509200&a mp;pagewanted=all

Jared Diamond, a professor of geography at the University of California, Los Angeles, is the author of “Collapse” and “Guns, Germs and Steel.”

Reply to this | Report this

By SamSnedegar, January 7 at 8:37 am #
(155 comments total)

waiting for Perot

yes, I voted for Perot, who told it like it was and used his charts to show us where we were going (and where we now have got).

And if I vote at all, I will likely vote for Dennis just to keep from having to vote for an outright liar who won’t talk about oil. (See Alan Greenscum book)

Reply to this | Report this

By Tahut, January 7 at 7:57 am #
(1 comments total)

The Primary season is all over with?

At least, what I’ve been reading on-line, the media has decided that since Obama “won” in Iowa, all the other candidates should throw in the towel, else be marked as sore losers. There are 49 other “States” that have a say to...at least I thought they did. Don’t they?

Personally, I’d like to see them all stay in and fight to out all the way to the convention floor. Make it a history making event, one that would put the repugs to shame.

Reply to this | Hide 1 reply | Report this

By cyrena, January 7 at 8:22 am #
(4172 comments total)

Re: The Primary season is all over with?

Yep, they sure do have a say. (Or at least that’s the way they describe it). So, regardless of what the ‘media has decided’, everybody else in those 49 states can decide for themselves, and they SHOULD.

I think all of these candidates have web sites, so if nothing else, everybody should check them out, and see what they have to say.

Got questions? Call ‘em up. Send them an email. Ask for a response, clarification, etc, etc.

Just don’t let the ‘media’ decide for you.

Reply to this | Report this

By ocjim, January 7 at 7:56 am #
(357 comments total)

Futile Argument

I agree with Hedges until he gets to the part about Kucinich and the “groan of the comfortable.”

He is right about Kucinich representing the right direction for our democracy. Hedges’ message is the right message but his words can’t turn around over two hundred years of cultural history.

We’ve been heading in the direction of “rugged individualism” for a long time, but the competition for and the depletion of our vast resources is now channeling us to a Social-Darwinism approach in which the rich and powerful are winning. The “rugged individualism” attitude even intimidates the poor into believing they are failures if they have no money.

The “groan of the comfortable” is also translated by the vote of the poor. By voting for the failed Bush, we saw that even the poor voted against their own interests.

Hedges does not identify the years of propaganda that got us here. The absence of a social security net (health care, retirement, worker’s rights, child car)like the other advanced countries makes the affluent (though the middle class is becoming less so) and especially the poor subject to the fear-mongering of the feckless Bush and the Republican candidates.

So supporting Kucinich is futile until we educate the people about our right to feel secure in mind and body—health care, education, retirement, worker’s rights, child care, etc.

Reply to this | Hide 1 reply | Report this

By cyrena, January 7 at 8:09 am #
(4172 comments total)

Re: Futile Argument

EXCELLENTE ocjim!!

You’ve got it all right here. Indeed, we have to educate ourselves that these things are in fact our rights, and in our own best interests, COLLECTIVELY as well as individually.

That’s the part that I think we still don’t get. We DO have this right to feel secure in these things, and unless we can ALL feel that way, it doesn’t matter how well off the ‘individual’ thinks that he or she is.

If I’m ‘well’ and healthy, but the rest of my neighbors have TB, how long am I gonna be ‘well’ and healthy.

If I’m well employed, and comfortably housed, but the majority are homeless and without the basics, how long will it be before they’re needing to hit me up, if only for survival?

And if I’m well educated, and know how to connect the dots, and understand a bit of how the world works, how helpful is that if nobody else does?

How much help is MY ‘education’, if I can’t build my own cars, and grow my own food, or treat my own medical problems, or find a way to dispose of all of my trash, and clean the streets, and put out any fires, or protect myself in the event of a natural disaster?

Nope, it’s just not enough. EVERYBODY has to feel secure in their mind/body/spirit, or we’re all screwed.

Reply to this | Report this

By Expat, January 7 at 7:56 am #
(872 comments total)

Not a challenge, just a question

By RdV, January 7 at 7:40 am #
(78 comments total)

Who’s clean?

Reply to this | Report this

By RdV, January 7 at 7:40 am #
(176 comments total)

That's the best you can do?

The nobody is perfect argument?

Kucinich cynically prostituted his own true believers. I saw his tight seething little face intent on exacting revenge on Edwards to settle the score. Goes to show you how much the issues truly mean to him when he is willing to sacrifice them to get even. What a petty, pathetic little man--made especially shameful by the new age cosmic love crap he spews like he is some kind of evolved spiritual soul--when he is just another dirty player--exploiting his followers.

Reply to this | Report this

By hetzer, January 7 at 7:32 am #
(167 comments total)

Obama is black and he has an Arab sounding name.

The Republicans have picked another Democratic candidate to lose or get shot.

Kucinich was marginalized a long time ago.

(We need to develop a system of direct voting to get rid of “representative” government once and for all.  Commercial media should be reduced to the size of a toilet.  And, we need a liars court similar to a small claims court with a jury of five.

Reply to this | Report this

By VillageElder, January 7 at 7:21 am #
(102 comments total)

Dennis speaks to the desires

Dennis speaks to the desires of the majority of the American public (Gallop Poll(?)).  The positions he espouses are those of our country’s population, e.g., universal health care, better education, full employment and protection from corporate excesses.
By rejecting Kucinch’s dialog the MSM and corporate media are rejecting the majority of Americans’ positions.

The Rue Paul trolls like to repeat the dogma and lies of the anti-abortion crowd.  They should never be considered pro-life.  This group is for the death penalty, against universal health care, pro-war, and anti-education—hardly pro-life stances.  Ron Paul is against abortion and contraception.

Reply to this | Report this

By Expat, January 7 at 7:18 am #
(872 comments total)

On second thought.........

By RdV, January 7 at 5:22 am #
(77 comments total)

Kucinich is the best for breaking away from the path leading to fascism.  It’s easy to rip any candidate; any one in the public eye is a target.  We have to go to our core values (whatever they may be) and go with the “person” who represents that value.  For me Kucinich, as stated by himself, is the closest to that ideal.  Nobody is perfect, so let’s get real and go with the “person” who will protect our human rights!  Step back and look at where we have gone; it’s far from the America I grew up with; it’s far from the life I want for myself and my loved ones; hell, it’s far from anything I have ever wanted for me or anyone else.  Are our ideals and principals just a bunch of idealist shit or are they real and truly worth dying for…….just what the hell are we really all about?  That is the question and the answer is more important than we can possibly imagine.

Reply to this | Report this

By QuyTran, January 7 at 6:58 am #
(843 comments total)

WHERE'S DEMOCRACY ?

No Kucinick in the debate there’s absolutely no DEMOCRACY ! So we need democracy be imported from Pakistan or China mainland.

Reply to this | Report this

By jackpine savage, January 7 at 6:51 am #
(704 comments total)

don't blame me, i voted for Kodos...

All of this reminds me of an old Simpson’s Halloween special wherein the alien monsters take over the bodies of Bob Dole and Bill Clinton.  At the final stump speech some guy in the crowd shouts, “I’m going to vote for a third party.” And one of the aliens replies, “Go ahead, throw away your vote.” The episode ends with the Simpson family enslaved to build a giant laser and Homer quips, “Don’t blame me, i voted for Kodos.”

Mr. Hedges gets it, amen.  It is high time that we all started to throw away our votes.  Vote for third, fourth, and fifth parties...especially locally.  Vote Kucinich and Paul (depending if you’re a leftie or a rightie).  Go out of your way to vote for the candidates who don’t have a chance.

At this stage of the game, no “major” candidate is going to be flawless...not even Mr. Kucinich.  Politics is a dirty game, and it always has been.  If we expect that to change on the national scene, we will first have to change it on the local scene.

Personally, i’ve decided that if this election shapes up like it looks like it will, i’ll be writing in “none of the above”.  I cannot hold my nose any longer; i cannot rationalize which evil is lesser any more; and, as so well put by Expat, i’ll be damned if i’m going to continue shitting in my own nest....

Reply to this | Report this

By troublesum, January 7 at 6:07 am #
(316 comments total)

By dismissing Kucinich they are

By dismissing Kucinich they are dismissing single payer health care, immediate withdrawal from Iraq, immediate action on global warming, etc.  This is how they do it.  Trash any candidate who stands for these things, then none of the others dares to raise these issues.  Most importantly, keep on repeating “he doesn’t have a chance” until it becomes a reality.

Reply to this | Report this

By Expat, January 7 at 5:59 am #
(872 comments total)

Given I've lost my mind.....I've looked everywhere, really..............

By RdV, January 7 at 5:22 am #
(77 comments total)

just what do you suggest?  I hope you took my previous comment as tongue firmly planted in cheek.  I’m at a loss and thoroughly fed up with all of the fascist bullshit.  Information trickles down slower than Reagonomics and I’m not in the states, so I really have to search and there are only so many hours in a day.  Tell me what your spin on this morass is.

Reply to this | Report this

By RdV, January 7 at 5:22 am #
(176 comments total)

Hedge funds

Read somewhere that Kucinich claimed that it was Edward’s association with hedge funds that cause him to cynically use his supporters to back Obama to get back at Edwards--(one is left to ask how important the issues really are to congressman Kucinich)--considering Obama’s major support:

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/0dd41b74-33ff-11dc-9887-0000 779fd2ac.html?nclick_check=1

Reply to this | Report this

By Expat, January 7 at 5:15 am #
(872 comments total)

You asshole....you

By RdV, January 7 at 4:31 am #
(76 comments total)

Response

had to make me completely rethink everything I thought I knew....damnit, you make me work too hard!  Crap!  This is way more complicated than I ever knew. I need time to digest this; I’ll get back to you!

Reply to this | Report this

By Jaded Prole, January 7 at 5:04 am #
(68 comments total)

Don't Play the Corporatocracy's Game

It is to be expected that the corporatocracy would do everything in its power to undermine a candidate like Kucinich. What is disgusting is that so many of us buy into the “unelectability” theory. “They” tell us who is electable and “we” choose between the bought out selectees? That doesn’t cut it. Kucinich is authentic, un-owned and not for sale. If that rules him out as a possibility for leadership than we should admit that the game is over and either give up or work together to replace this corrupted system of government with a better one.

Reply to this | Report this

By Expat, January 7 at 2:57 am #
(872 comments total)

Key's?

I have a question, many actually:  What does it say about us, that a man like Kucinich not only exists, but is actively seeking the presidency and is largely ignored by us?  Forget the press, they are followers of which ever way the wind blows; we ultimately control our destiny and could have anybody we want for president and just look at the things we choose.  It’s as though we are willing to shit our own nest; how disgusting is that?  I guess this is further evidence we actually do get the things we want.  Which answers the question of how we got Bush/Cheney.  This is not a pretty picture.  Being in love with similes’, metaphors and allusions; it’s kind of like being in prison and being given the keys to get out, but forgetting what a key looks like.

Reply to this | Hide 1 reply | Report this

By Dr. Knowitall, PhD, PhD, January 7 at 4:55 am #
(567 comments total)

Re: Key's?

Right.  The electorate doesn’t believe the Kucinich message and that may be money driven--he needs to switch ad agencies. 

If Kucinich really wants to be prez--next time, because it’s too late now--he has to change his message to one the electorate will believe, whether or not he does, and then, once in, get on with his agenda.

Reply to this | Report this

By Marc Louis Hébert, January 7 at 2:36 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

How could he not mention

How could he not mention Ron Paul?

Is Freedom a problem?

Reply to this | Hide 1 reply | Report this

By cyrena, January 7 at 5:30 am #
(4172 comments total)

Re: How could he not mention

Re-read the article, and you’ll find out why Ron Paul would not be mentioned.

Here are at least a few of the things for which Ron Paul does NOT support… beginning with what Kucinich stated as the reason for the downfall of the Democratic party..

‘….“Lack of commitment to democratic principles…’

When are you Ron Paulies gonna get it, that his is NOT an agenda based on democracy. In reality, it is the OPPOSITE, because RP is not interested in anything more than unregulated PRIVATIZAION. That’s why Ron Paul is outspokenly against any of these ideas here.

A full-employment economy. Kucinich wants to put people back to work, doing the things that we need, as a nation, INCLUDING the rebuilding of our crumbling infrastructure. He’s not talking about using corporate or private dollars to do that, by making a bid with whatever private company offers the best deal, and then charges the public to use it.

For instance, Texas, (Ron Paul’s state) is falling apart at the seams in its own infrastructure, because Texas does not collect a state income tax, to provide for these things, within their own state. So, they frequently resort to TOLLS, say for bridges. A private investor puts up the money, and builds the bridge, or the road, or whatever, and then the people using it, pay the state or the business back, by paying a toll to utilize that public space. The end result is that anyone who cannot afford to pay the toll, becomes marginalized and left on the fringes, lacking access to wherever the resources are.

Then we get to the single-payer health issue, which is the biggie, and the VERY thing that RP adamantly opposes. This would eliminate the obscene profits realized by the insurance corps, who have in effect, taken over the health care industry. In short, Ron Paul is RADICALLY opposed to that, and obviously believes that it should continue to be privatized, so that only those who can afford it, have access to it.

The system that Kucinich offers and advocates is what I have coined as a 21st Century version of the New Deal that Roosevelt used to bring America out of the depression. And, there is not a single candidate currently running, who is MORE adamantly OPPOSED to such a concept, than Ron Paul.

So, as always, I’m STILL trying to figure out what the Paulie groupies mean by ‘freedom’. Would that be ‘freedom’ to die in which hole you choose to be abandoned to? Or would that mean the ‘freedom’ (for a FEW) to practice highway robbery against the rest of us – the masses; i.e., we pay you whatever it is that you’re charging, for whatever it is that we need, or we just do without? Sounds like a 3rd world country that works on bribes, and unregulated deal making. Like, what we have with the neoconns NOW.

So, is that what you mean by ‘freedom’? Because we know that you aren’t REALLY talking about civil liberties, such as the right to privacy, and all of the spying and the things that Kucinich addresses right here in this article.

No, that is NOT the ‘freedom’ that Ron Paul speaks to. The “freedom” that RP advocates is for a FEW to exercise, if they have the power and the muscle, against the masses. And, he also advocates a REPEAL of many of the freedoms that our laws have already guaranteed, such as a woman’s right to choose what happens to her own body.

So, STOP with the freedom and liberty thing in reference to Ron Paul, because that is NOT what his agenda is about. It is the OPPOSITE of a democratic policy, and that’s what Kucinich has always advocated..a commitment to DEMOCRATIC principals. Libertarianism is NOT in line with democratic principles. Period, dot.

Reply to this | Report this
Comment Pages: «1 2

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox

Privacy Policy

 
Click here to advertise with Truthdig
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
Robert Scheer's new book offers first-hand insight into the presidential mind
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2008 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.