I can’t put any confidence at all in the fabled “American people that get it right” who TWICE gave a moron enough votes to cheat his way into power. That a moron like Freddy Ballscratcher could even RUN for POTUS let alone appear to win after all the cheating is done says all that needs to be said.

That the best we have to offer, like Paul and Kucinich, are marginalized and destroyed by the msm says it all: i.e. the voting public are no more than victims of a giant Ponzi scheme and too naive and indifferent to ever “get it right.”

Patrick Henry,

Thanks so much for this link. Quite revealing, as you noted…not just for who is on it, but for who is NOT. Not a sign of Kucinich, or Ron Paul either for that matter.

And, look at where Bloomberg is, and he hasn’t even announced any candidacy. I didn’t know a whole lot about him before, and now I know enough (from this) to know that he would NOT be a choice for us. (Israel maybe, not US)

Oddly enough, they’ve also included Chuck Hagle…and HE hasn’t announced any candidacy either, even though I suspected he might be part of a consideration, based on the article that I posted a few days ago, on the upcoming ‘unity’ conference that Bloomberg has organized.

So, how is it that that the Israelis, (in their MAIN media) have already included these guys in THEIR considerations, for OUR president, and WE have nothing more than a ‘rumor’ (if that much) that they are even considering such.

Kind of makes us wonder why we bother, eh? Should we just wait to decide on who the Israelis choose for us?

Rank your candidate, the Israelis already did.

Please note who is not on their list.

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/rosnerPage.jhtml

I’m not sure where Marie is going with her piece but one thing is sure: we can’t afford another conservative man like McCain. If she is promoting McCain, no one has shown more lack of spunk, more partisanship than McCain. No one has shown more equivocation than clinton. If she is comparing Obama in his inexperience to Carter, that doesn’t wash either.

All I know is if we again choose the wrong man or woman to succeed the utter failure we call Bush, we are in trouble. Eight years of the Bush mistake has our democracy and our planets welfare on the ropes.

So dark the Clinton con.

This article might as well be a glorified bumper sticker handed out by HillaryoUS. i’ve always heard that Clinton connections with the media run deep, now i’m seeing all of these completely unreasoned articles patting good ol’ Hilary on the back. Suspicions confirmed.

Where is the meat in this article? None to be found. Simply asserting your opinion is not political news nor convincing op/ed. Neither is to reiterate the HillaryoUS campaign slogan and say, “Yeah, pick a president like me…” Weak and transparent at best.  And to suggest that great leadership lies in “Look at me, I got a POW released…” Richardson, who barely edges the current presidential mis-speaker in abilities of public oration, who has assured America that he will “continue to make mistakes,” yet is the most likely VP candidate for Hilary… oh wait, i see it now. This is the handbill for the “Victory from the Jaws of Defeat” playbook being distributed to unscrupulous journalists nationwide who covet access should HIllary the Inevitable win the presidency.

Leave the biased love letters to us, the peanut gallery.

A nod to Cyrena for pointing out the omission of Kucinich as having plenty of chronological as well as meaningful experience.

CoccoPuff seems to put a lot more importance on the “World” and our “image” abroad than seems warranted. The real problems are right here at home and we’d better fix them before embarking on any more crusades or humanitarian missions. Our era as global messiah is just about over.

Marie is using Jimmy Carter as an example of how important ‘experience’ is, based on his failed presidency,) to compare to the big ‘issue’ that all have chosen to use against Obama. (it’s a constant refrain now…he doesn’t have any ‘experience’)

Somebody help me out here. Did the American public not have ANY understanding of the word just over 7 years ago? Did NO ONE even give that a thought? I mean sure, things have changed DRASTICALLY in the past 7 years, and we all know that. But were things really so peachy keen 7 years ago, to prompt this:

•  Bush won handily as the pick of those Republicans who placed moral issues at the top of their agenda, as well as those who based their choice on which Republican seemed most electable in November.

Was that REALLY the only thing folks were concerned about back then? Moral issues for the repugs, and medicare, social security, and education for the Dems? Is this why Bush won ‘handily’ even though he had ZERO ‘experience’ in moral issues, or any damn thing else?

Well yes, I do believe she’s right. As a matter of fact, I distinctly remember having a ‘political’ conversation with a cousin over the merits of Gore v Bush, and my cousin told me that he didn’t feel confident or secure with Gore, because….(get this), “he really hadn’t DONE anything!” (never mind those 8 years as VP). And yep, my cousin still votes, and a whole bunch of those same people still exist.

So, I don’t get the ‘experience’ thing with Obama, although I’ll admit that Bill Richardson has more, and she mentioned him along with Biden. But, Kucinich has more than Hillary, and she didn’t even mention him.

The part of Hillary’s experience that she ‘did’ mention, (traveling around to visit politically oppressed peoples w/ historical injustices) isn’t all that different from Obama’s rather international character. They’re both attorneys; he’s a civil rights attorney who has taught int’l law, and she’s a corporate attorney, who once represented Georgie the kid in one of his many failures as a wanna be oil exec with Harken Oil; when he lost all of the investors’ money. (yep, she helped bail him out THAT time!)

She’s been a Sen. for what, nearly 5 years now? He was in the Illinois Senate for a few years, and then now the US Senate for a couple or so. I’m not sure there’s a real big difference here, (experience wise) unless we’re counting chronological age, and at least 2 additional decades of experience in the corruptive nature of US politics. And Obama is well aware of the biggest festering infectious blister that brought so much of this ‘terrorist’ stuff upon us anyway. Yeah, tiny little Israel, and all the millions of ethnically cleansed Palestinians. He’s been in tune with that for at least a decade. (until he got mixed up in the corruption of the US game and got busy.) Has Hillary ever made THAT connection? Not that I’ve ever heard her talk about…in the past 2 decades. (Guess she missed them on her tour of politically oppressed peoples and historical injustices).

Then this:
•  “Former President Bill Clinton’s comment that his wife’s “first thing” as President would be to send him and former President George H.W. Bush on a worldwide fence-mending tour has a political subtext. It signals that a second Clinton administration would give a free pass to the second Bush administration on its abuses.

story @  Consortiumnews.com.

I think you blew this one Marie. Hillary’s is NOT the kind of ‘experience’ that we need, and I don’t think we’re dependent on Iowans to pick our next prez either. You should have read Boyarsky’s piece.
Biden is hard-headed, and if you won’t even MENTION Kucinich, then you better hope it’s either Richardson or Obama. Hillary’s ‘experience’ would give us 2 repug war mongers to choose from. Gee.
Oh! BTW. Osama bin Laden DEAD. Somebody should tell Barak. Hillary already knows.

I think we’re in deep shit. THAT much at least is correct.

3rd party miracle?