LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.Best Political Blog Winner, 2007 Webby Awards, People's Voice and Jury.   On the Campaign Trail : Bill Boyarsky Reports on the Election
 
September 5, 2008
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Reports
 * NEW! * McCain the Divider
 * NEW! * Memoir Politics
 * NEW! * Making Goliath Walk

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Yes We Can Can

Digs
Inside the Data Mine

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Reports

Peace With the Earth

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Dec 27, 2007

By Ellen Goodman

BOSTON—Since this is the list-making time of year, allow me to add a tiny trophy to Al Gore’s very full shelf: the prize for the most elegant speech of 2007.

I wasn’t sure how the politician-turned-environmentalist fit the profile for a Nobel Peace Prize, but his acceptance speech connected the dots. “Without realizing it,” Gore said, “we have begun to wage war on the Earth itself. Now, we and the Earth’s climate are locked in a relationship familiar to war planners: mutually assured destruction.”

How many Americans actually heard these words of war and peace? The coverage from Oslo was overshadowed by the coverage from Iowa. The presidential campaigns used up the oxygen that might have been reserved for the greenhouse gases.

The inconvenient truth of the 2008 election year is that climate change is still way down the dance card of most-talked-about topics. It’s ranked No. 12 among Democratic candidates, and No. 15 among Republicans. Out of the 2,275 questions on the Sunday morning talk shows, the League of Conservation Voters counted only three on global warming.

Indeed, the environment has made little more than a cameo appearance on the campaign trail. Climate showed up in the last Iowa debate at the Tinker Bell moment when Republican candidates were asked to raise their hands if they believed climate change was a real threat and caused by human activity. It got a star turn in July when an animated snowman at the YouTube debate asked the Democrats if his little snow-son would live a “full and happy life.”

From time to time, the candidates doff their carbon caps and calculate their carbon footprints. But the warming of the globe, the fact that the ice cap is “falling off of a cliff,” as scientists say, doesn’t heat up the campaign as much as paying for the education of an illegal immigrant.

Gore told the Nobel crowd, “We have everything we need to get started, save perhaps political will.” But, he added optimistically, “Political will is a renewable resource.” Will it get renewed?

When 187 countries met in Bali in early December to form a climate change treaty, our country was booed and isolated. We refused to join other industrialized nations in guaranteeing cuts of greenhouse gas emissions. A frustrated man from Papua New Guinea finally told the Bush delegation, “If you cannot lead, leave it to the rest of us. Get out of the way.”

It was at the last minute that our wrecking crew of delegates compromised on a meager road map. They agreed only to work for an agreement ... by 2009. For the first time, industrial and developing countries are on the same path, but any real action has been kicked down that path.

Today America remains the leading producer of one product: greenhouse gases. Congress finally passed an energy bill that will raise fuel standards for cars to 35 miles a gallon by 2020. After 30 years of stalling, we are moving into first gear, too little and maybe too late. Meanwhile, the EPA just denied the more ambitious attempts by California and other states to control emissions. Political will as a renewable resource?

This Christmas we had a national anxiety attack about unsafe toys. Eighty percent of our toys are made in China. But what is more dangerous for our children, the lead paint in some Chinese factories or the fact that China’s emissions may soon surpass our own? What’s worse, that we are China’s biggest customer or their worst role model?

Meanwhile, did you have a green Xmas? A blizzard of faux environmentalism coated the holidays. The upscale Barneys store touted “sensationally sustainable swag” and “orgasmic organic denim.” We were told we can shop to save the world, consume to sustain the Earth.

Or maybe you got a ticket for the new, hip “tourism of doom.” Go see Mount Kilimanjaro while there is still a snowflake and the Arctic while there is still a polar bear.

In 2007, consciousness rose with the thermostat. Scientists layered one set of facts on another. Gore wrapped these facts into an attention-grabbing movie. After Bali, the world’s leaders are just waiting for this presidency to pass. But we are still waiting for the renewable energy to fuel election-year politics.

On the day Gore spoke to the Nobel audience, he said, “We dumped another 70 million tons of global-warming pollution into the thin shell of atmosphere surrounding our planet, as if it were an open sewer. ... We are what is wrong, and we must make it right.”

I still have a stack of greeting cards wishing Peace on Earth. Is it too corny to wish that we begin the new year making Peace with the Earth?

Ellen Goodman’s e-mail address is ellengoodman(at)globe.com.

© 2007, Washington Post Writers Group

Email Newsletter

Get truth delivered to your inbox every week.

Previous item: The Iowa Caucus Con

Next item: The Path to a National Popular Vote

Jump to Comments

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By Sarah Abner, December 31, 2007 at 1:38 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

“Good riddance...”? That is a very war-like attitude “let’s kill - or in this case, let them kill themselves - the ones we don’t like”.

Here’s the bigger moral problem as I see it: By the time the effects of climate change reach the top of the food chain, our action and inaction will cause/is causing much suffering among the rest of the creatures and lifesystems on the planet. While we can claim some “right” to destroy ourselves, not so other beings with whom we share the planet.

Report this

By prosefights, December 29, 2007 at 4:18 pm #

“The average household in America consumes 10,656 kilowatt-hours (kWh) per year, according to the Department of Energy. In 2006, Gore devoured nearly 221,000 kWh—more than 20 times the national average.”

http://www.prosefights.org/pnmelectric/pnmelectric.htm

We’re concerned about mainstream media and lawyer bs.

Report this

By weather, December 29, 2007 at 2:29 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Thanks again Ellen Goodman, pls. don’t yield.

Report this

By Fadel Abdallah, December 28, 2007 at 7:57 pm #

“Today America remains the leading producer of one product: greenhouse gases.”
==========================
True, but America remains also the leading producer and user of weapons of mass destruction in the world with all the damaging effect on the environment the production and usage of these weapons brings. So my point here is that bringing peace on earth must come before peace with the earth; if the first happens the second would follow as a matter of cause and effect.

Report this

By rachel, December 28, 2007 at 2:11 pm #

I gotta say I like that major companies are at least trying to integrate eco-consciousness into mainstream products, even if it is minimum-impact. And Al Gore should get quite a bit of that credit; almost any environmental conversation goes to “Have you seen/read An Inconvenient Truth?” “Well, yeah, but the problem’s existed for a while . . .”

Whatever. Maybe eco-consumerism is annoying (or does it only annoy me?) but it’s getting SOMETHING done. Props to Mr. Gore for getting people involved. Even the store from hell, WalMart, is carrying reusable shopping totes now.

Report this

By BruSays, December 27, 2007 at 4:02 pm #

Rachel,

Today, a reusable coffee cuff.
Tomorrow, a reusable coffee cup.

Baby Steps

Report this

By BruSays, December 27, 2007 at 1:28 pm #

Baby steps.

Report this

By Thomas Billis, December 27, 2007 at 12:46 pm #

No more columns about Al Gore.I get depressed enough every time I wake up and realize that the chimp is President without you reminding of what could have been if Al Gore was President.Top of the list we could have had a President with command of the English language.

Report this

By rosestar, December 27, 2007 at 9:23 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

This is good insight.War is slowly killing us all.The greed and competition has to stop.Conservation is a must.Corporations make their profits by overproduction. When this is not viable they resort to war.There is a growing awareness and people are committing themselves to taking political action.Friends of the Earth has a website that shows different stategies towards this, along with nunerous other environmental organizations.I think people are aware of the manipulations done by the corporate business’s philosophy of mass consumerism. Also through different enviromentalist research being done people are becoming aware of the huge subsidies that are being given to Big oil, coal,and nuclear industries.Banks are saying they have concern for the environment but are only giving a small percentage of funding for research and developement of sustainable energy.Bank of America is one of these institutions.People can write to this bank and let them know that this is not acceptable and will take measures with thier money if they do not cooperate.Also the vast amount of taxpayers money for illegal war{A completely immoral criminal enterprise},could be used instead for rebuilding the infrastructure.People can demand that the foriegn policy being done for corporate profit is not acceptable and refuse to have their taxes go towards these policies.

Report this

By Douglas Chalmers, December 27, 2007 at 7:05 am #

#122745 by altara on 12/27: “We often criticize President Bush..... but in the long term, by denying and ignoring the climate change threat, he will have caused far more loss of lives and property....”

Maybe that will actually help to end wars, altara? If the human race doesn’t care enough about itself to stop MAD and nuclear/biological/chemical weapons, etc etc, why bother to worry about the effects of climate change on people? In the end, good riddance......

We’ve already discussed this speech last week, though. It wasn’t all that elegant then - why so today? To much bubbly for Christmas at Truthdig? As it was, it started off with some awful crawling to “your royal highnesses”, etc, uhh.

Report this

By altara, December 27, 2007 at 6:11 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Excellent post, both in praising the Gore speech and in decrying our wasteful ways.

We often criticize President Bush for the damage he has done to our culture and economy and the lives and property needlessly lost in the misguided Iraq war. All correct, but in the long term, by denying and ignoring
the climate change threat, he will have caused far more loss of lives and property.

homer http://www.altara.blogspot.com

Report this

By rachel, December 27, 2007 at 2:01 am #

You gotta love how pseudo-environmentalism has flooded the consumer market. I’m sick of this “eco couture” crap. “Lookit me, I have a reusable cuff on my latte! I’m giving back! Hurrr.”

But at least it’s cool to care.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox

Privacy Policy

 
Click here to advertise with Truthdig
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2008 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.