LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
May 27, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     barack obama     robert scheer     gay marriage     chris hedges     ndaa
Most Read

Say 'Hi-Ho!' as They Strip-Search You

TED: 'A Money-Soaked Orgy of Self-Congratulatory Futurism'

I Can't Hear Myself Think

A Rare Admission That Money Trumps Everything Else

Children Slaughtered in Government Attack on Syrian Town

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Why Bain Questions Matter
OSHA Struggles When Tower Climbers Die

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Better Than We Found It
The Good-Natured Dictator

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar
Ravens in the Storm

Ravens in the Storm

By Carl Oglesby
$16.50

more items

 
Reports

Have They No Shame?

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on Nov 27, 2007

By Amy Goodman

Every Saturday, the president of the United States gives a radio address to the nation. It is followed by the Democratic response, usually given by a senator or representative. This past Saturday the Democrats chose retired Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez to give their response, the same general accused in at least three lawsuits in the U.S. and Europe of authorizing torture and cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment of prisoners in Iraq. This, combined with the Democrats’ endorsement of Attorney General Michael Mukasey despite his unwillingness to label waterboarding as torture, indicates that the Democrats are increasingly aligned with President Bush’s torture policies.

  Sanchez headed the Army’s operations in Iraq from June 2003 to June 2004. In September 2003, Sanchez issued a memo authorizing numerous techniques, including “stress positions” and the use of “military working dogs” to exploit “Arab fear of dogs” during interrogations. He was in charge when the abuses at Abu Ghraib prison occurred.

  Brig. Gen. Janis Karpinski, who headed Abu Ghraib at the time, worked under Gen. Sanchez. She was demoted to colonel, the only military officer to be punished. She told me about another illegal practice, holding prisoners as so-called ghost detainees: “We were directed on several occasions through Gen. [Barbara] Fast or Gen. Sanchez. The instructions were originating at the Pentagon from Secretary Rumsfeld, and we were instructed to hold prisoners without assigning a prisoner number or putting them on the database, and that is contrary to the Geneva Conventions. We all knew it was contrary to the Geneva Conventions.” In addition to keeping prisoners off the database there were other abuses, she said, like prison temperatures reaching 120 to 140 degrees, dehydration and the order from Gen. Geoffrey Miller to treat prisoners “like dogs.”

  And it’s not just about treatment of prisoners. In 2006, Karpinski testified at a mock trial, called the Bush Crimes Commission. She revealed that several female U.S. soldiers had died of dehydration by denying themselves water. They were afraid to go to the latrine at night to urinate, for fear of being raped by fellow soldiers: “Because the women, in fear of getting up in the hours of darkness to go out to the portolets or the latrines, were not drinking liquids after 3:00 or 4:00 in the afternoon. And in 120-degree heat or warmer, because there was no air conditioning at most of the facilities, they were dying from dehydration in their sleep. What [Sanchez’s deputy commanding general, Walter Wojdakowski] told the surgeon to do was, ‘Don’t brief those details anymore. And don’t say specifically that they’re women. You can provide that in a written report, but don’t brief it in the open anymore.’” Karpinski said Sanchez was at that briefing.

  Former military interrogator Tony Lagouranis, author of “Fear Up Harsh,” described the use of dogs: “We were using dogs in the Mosul detention facility, which was at the Mosul airport. We would put the prisoner in a shipping container. We would keep him up all night with music and strobe lights, stress positions, and then we would bring in dogs. The prisoner was blindfolded, so he didn’t really understand what was going on, but we had the dog controlled. The dog would be barking and jumping on the prisoner, and the prisoner wouldn’t really understand what was going on.”

Advertisement

  Reed Brody of Human Rights Watch elaborated on Sanchez: “For those three months of mayhem that were occurring right under his nose, he never stepped in. And, also, he misled Congress about it. He was asked twice at a congressional hearing whether he ever approved the use of guard dogs. This was before the memo came out. And both times he said he never approved it. [W]e finally got the actual memo, in which he approves ‘exploiting Arab fear of dogs.’ ” Brody dismissed the military report clearing Sanchez of any wrongdoing: “It’s just not credible for the Army to keep investigating itself and keep finding itself innocent.”

  This is not about politics. This is about the moral compass of the nation. The Democrats may be celebrating a retired general who has turned on his commander in chief. But the public should take pause.

  The Democrats had a chance to draw a line in the sand, to absolutely require Mukasey to denounce waterboarding before his elevation to attorney general. Now they have chosen as their spokesman a discredited general, linked to the most egregious abuses in Iraq. The Bush administration passed Sanchez over for a promotion, worried about reliving the Abu Ghraib scandal during the 2006 election year. Now it’s the Democrats who have resuscitated him. Have they no shame?

  Amy Goodman is the host of “Democracy Now!,” a daily international TV/radio news hour airing on 500 stations in North America.

  © 2007 Amy Goodman

  Distributed by King Features Syndicate


New and Improved Comments

We are launching a major overhaul of our comments section.

In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread.

Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts.

Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with.

Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page.

By P. T., November 27, 2007 at 10:31 pm Link to this comment

Unfortunately for the Democrats, Hitler was unavailable.

Report this

By cyrena, November 27, 2007 at 10:03 pm Link to this comment

#116439 by C.P.T.L.

Well C.P.T.L..

Somebody was paying attention. The title changed just in the time it took me to cook dinner.

I saw the original title, but didn’t have a chance to read it right then. Now, it has a different one. I would have read it anyway, but you make a good point, and so it would seem that has been addressed.

That’s good. Let’s us know everybody is paying attention.

And, this is an excellent piece.

Report this

By Douglas Chalmers, November 27, 2007 at 9:57 pm Link to this comment

Quote Amy Goodman” “The Democrats had a chance to draw a line in the sand….. Democrats have gotten in bed with torturers, those who support cruel treatment of military prisoners and some who may have authorized such abuse….”

There is an interesting and compelling comaprison with the recent Australian federal election last Saturday. The result for one of the minor parties is very instructive…....

Just to repeat my previous post at http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/20071126_shakeup_down_under/ - The Greens and Family First are successful minor parties in the senate and, in the preferential voting system in Australia, the Greens were often listed ahead of either of the major parties in individual voting. The other main minor party - the Democrats, ha ha - was anihilated after failing to adequately represent voters’ wishes in opposing former PM Howard’s neocon policies!!!

Democrats to lose party status after 30 years - “For the first time in 30 years, the Australian Democrats won’t be represented in either house of the Federal Parliament. They are set to lose party status after being wiped out in Saturday’s vote, failing to poll 2 per cent of the vote around the country…...

Such is the state of the Democrats that on the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) website the party is now referred to just as “other”. Leader Lyn Allison conceded defeat and resigned yesterday, and her deputy, Andrew Bartlett, has been forced to admit that his career in politics is over….”   http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/11/26/2101885.htm?site=elections/federal/2007

Report this

By thomas billis, November 27, 2007 at 9:32 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

People in the press always blame the wrong people.Sure they are the people who carry out these horrible things but we are the ones who do not stand up and demand differently from opur elected officials.It is always that it will not happen to me syndrome.I am reminded of the saying from Nazi Germany.“When they came and took the Jews nobody spoke up.When they came and took the gypsies nobody spoke up .When they came and took the gays nobody spoke up.When they came and took me there was nobody to speak up”.

Report this

By GW=MCHammered, November 27, 2007 at 8:40 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Bush, Clinton, Democrats, Republicans, Iraq War, War on Terrorism. Wouldn’t you just like to put it all behind you?

Tomorrow, it’s all over. ‘They’ are all gone. Now, what does this America look like? How does it make you feel? On the way to work or the mall, other Americans are your teammates. You look at each other that way. Why? Because We The People own this nation. AND WE ARE A TEAM. The world is watching…

Want real change? Free your vision. The rest will happen.

(me too)

Report this

By Don Stivers, November 27, 2007 at 8:28 pm Link to this comment

Those of the Democratic Party that voted to give Bush the authority to go to war have to chose someone that will cover their asses.  You know, go along as if he did nothing wrong and maybe people will not notice.

Sort of like the press does when they ignore the fact that Clinton and Edwards voted for the war and ignore the people who got it right in the first place.

What a bunch of wimps.

Report this

By C.P.T.L., November 27, 2007 at 7:51 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Fear Up Harsh, huh?

Another in a YEARS long chain of interesting and prescient articles capped with a silly pun, or juvenile, or inaccessible, or faux-cool, or wise-ass, or ironical, or angry, or next-to-nonsense title; a title that does not shoot straight just like the article’s contents.

Military is this one? A book title or something? Whoop-ti-do, there you go: silly, juvenile, inaccessible, faux-cool, wise-ass, ironical, angry, next-to-nonsense…  nothing like the above well written piece.

Take a look at the many articles about our absurd and dangerous millenium and find inside: some of the most interesting, focused and thoughtful analysis to be found in years.

Read a list of their titles and find a compendium of pun-riddled, snarky, obscure juvenalia.

And that is my point: the titles are a compendium, and that compendium is a body as important as the articles themselves.

When we write, Bush Is At It Again, we all know what it means, but the searcher sees nothing but something unfocused and rightly considers the article to be more of the same.

When we write, Bush Lied Again, we transmit a statement of fact. For the reader who is unaware, or is disinclined to know the truth, a continued occurrence of simple, direct, un-silly, straight-to-the-point titles adds up. Even if they refuse to click the link, they must still confront an accumulation of facts.

An obscure sentence like, The Democrats ‘Fear Up Harsh’ is an invitation to NOT read the piece.

Report this

By Dylan, November 27, 2007 at 7:07 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Thank you Amy for focusing on this issue.

Of all the crimes of the Administration the torture
strikes me as being the worst of the worst.
These are the acts of fascists not freedom loving people. 
  To see the so called Democrats sit idly by is a real blow to our Nation.
  For anyone that wants to stay in denial, please see the final segment of Ken Burns documentary on WWII.  As you watch it remind yourself that Germany started out as a Christian Nation. 
  How far will our nation fall?

Report this

By mythbreaker, November 27, 2007 at 6:53 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

“show me who you walk with and I will tell you what you are”
Please free us from the bondage of Israel, this is not a relationship, its extortion made to look like a relationship - and that is a very cruel torture too.

Report this
Tony Wicher's avatar

By Tony Wicher, November 27, 2007 at 6:48 pm Link to this comment

“The Democrats” is too general. I would like to know exactly which Democrats chose Sanchez and what their reasons were. This article gives no informationabout that.

Report this

By Margaret from Portland Oregon, November 27, 2007 at 6:46 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

It is a shame that Bush uses the National Guard when he went there to avoid going to Viet Nam and now that woman are warriers but are afraid because of being raped, did not the Army Navy and National Guard forget the nature of men and then put in to the order of the military mindset not think that this would happen, dollars to donuts I would not die because of being raped, I will yell long and loud while the person was trying to rape me, better yet I would go to the latrine with a small knife and cut into the man who tried to rape me, of course I might go to jail because of the incident but I would get justice even against the system.

On to war, things always happen during war, just because a law is laid down that does not mean that people will abide by it, if it were that people followed the law then this man in the white house would not have won, I remember what happened in Fla.

And then what happened in Ohio and this president stole both elections both times.

Report this
driving bear's avatar

By driving bear, November 27, 2007 at 6:46 pm Link to this comment

this proves that the only thing the democrats care about is being anti Bush. The democrats are not going to let a small thing like principles get in the way of bush bashing.

Report this

By P. T., November 27, 2007 at 6:41 pm Link to this comment

The Democrats are competing with the Republicans for the war criminal vote in the next election.

Report this

Page 2 of 2 pages  <  1 2

Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.