Too much TV.  Too much frat boy.

on could say the same about kerry and ted kennedy which one will bbe telling obama which one is running obama ,kerry or ted kennedy ?they are all three lyers ted kennedy is a drun and a killer and heres old ass kerry just wants a win win for anything .and here is this crook and bigot lyer obama wow what a three some.together they are the the votes of iraq sure obama voted for the iraq war and hell put America right back into it with this keneya war thing to.he will sell America out hes a dictator and a nasty muslim. break down mu slime.

Tek:  What are you talking about?  Did I miss some irony somewhere?

It hasn’t occurred to you that voters don’t care if he does get involved in policy? That’s the beautiful thing about the Hillary candidacy, it’s the only way to get the best president since FDR back in the WH.

Too some extent I believe in guilt by association.  The Democratic Leadership council is solidly backed by the Clintons even though its main purpose is to use money to manipulate the Democratic party.  The Clintons are up to their elbows in Pentagon and Israel money.  Whether Hillary or Bill rule, their real loyalty will be to the people who bought them.

Bill will not the run the White House, I am sure Hillary will be her own person, I can understand how Bill still has his ego, after all he was president of the United States.

To say this is a dynstay, come on there was Bush sr. then Clinton then Bush junior, but Hillary is not related to Bill therefore she is not a Clinton and is one in name only.

Chelsea is not going to follow momma to think that is like can people really see into the future.

I think that the far right will justify how Bush’s can do it but the Clintons cannot sounds just like hypocrits over and over I say let the best woman/man win.

The Republicians are running scared and if they do land the presidency for themselves, can they also win the congress, after congress are the ones who are supposed to run the county and the pres. is the Comander-in-chief.

The war was started to gain war powers, just like Hitler did in Germany, we will not quite do it like Germany but the blueprint looks similar.

by john polifronio on 12/23 at 2:05 am
(Unregistered commenter)

RAGE gives himself/herself (I’m guessing male) away, when he describes Bill Clinton as “Slick Willy.” I’ve “never” heard a Clinton admirer call Bill “Slick Willy.”

You sound like one of the brainwashed drones programmed from a script to describe Manchurian Hillary at the subliminal coaxing of her name recognition alone. “Hillary is the most warm, loving, professional, qualified candidate I know.” ROTFLMAO! I’ll bet you can’t put down in writing 10 things she’s done in the Senate that has benefited the Empire State she was elected to serve.

Clinton hater? I don’t think so, nephew! I voted for ol’ Slick Willy TWICE! I wish he could run again. All that notwithstanding, I am not going to risk a vote for Hillary on the false premise that the Presidency can be learned via osmosis and mere observational note-taking. Chelsea was BORN to the Governors’ Mansion in Arkansas, and went to Stanford from the White House, demonstrating what 23 of Big Dog’s chromosomes can do for a lady. But, that alone no more qualifies Chelsea to be the Governor or the President than having the last name Windsor would make you an heir to the British throne. Get over it. As much as I love John Goodman, King Ralph was a comical fantasy, but steeped in absolutely no reality AT ALL.

No one is a hateful loser just for not buying into the best hype Hillary’s campaign coffers can afford. Her showing cleavage does not address the issue of job outsourcing or loss of GDP because little is grown or manufactured in the adjoining 48 States of a Union dying from lack of education, healthcare, public service, and access to the wealth of the commons to which we have INALIENABLE RIGHT BY VIRTUE OF AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP. What about our lost rights and securities? What about the steadily receding economy? What about our foreign relations? What are her plans for legally holding the Bush43 Administration accountable for the predicament in which we now shamefully find ourselves? That Hillary is avoiding these issues through craftily managing her appearances, the questions she can be asked, and the selection of inquirers does not make me a Hillary hater who fears her. Her oh so careful selection of what she chooses to let us know about herself as opposed to what we really need to know, however, does leave me suspicious about what America will have in a President during a potential Hillary tenure. Candidates tend to govern the same way they run for office.

Bill came to Washington DC having been the Governor off his own steam. Now, Hillary wants to claim Bill’s steam for herself. That I’m not buying that does not make me a Clinton hater. I want to hear Hillary talk about how having been a corporate lawyer and a Senator has moved her to take the Nation to a new height after the setback of the dark ages of Bush43 imperialism. I’d even be glad to hear her rant on how pitching the Martha Stewart homemade wreath off a Rose Garden balcony the day after Christmas, as First Lady, helped her decide that there was a greater public work for her. I don’t hate Hillary to state that she needs to PROVE beyond all shadow of doubt that she is the next President, particularly when all her opponents are as bright and shiny as Hillary is. The Presidency of the United States of America is not the reward she’s due for being present there through years of Bill’s public service. Furthermore, I don’t think the Nation, especially in our current state, has the time to spare to mollycoddle another overindulged pampered elitist who has more of a sense of entitlement to the office than an earnest commitment and faithful obligation to bettering America, thereby bettering the world.

In the interests of justice I would almost say that Bill and Al Gore deserve another chance because of the way they were treated by the crook media.  But, the sad truth is that the Clintons never went out on a limb to defend others or even themselves.  Bill was asleep at the switch when it comes to the crooked court and the election of the filth.  Gore was almost as bad in failing to use the tools available to put of a challenge.  All of these people are part of a gentleman’s club.  God knows what to make of skull and bones Kerry.

RAGE gives himself/herself (I’m guessing male) away, when he describes Bill Cinton as “Slick Willy.” I’ve “never” heard a Clinton admirer call Bill “Slick Willy.”
Forget all the ludicrous prognostications and forebodings warning us against a Hillary presidency.  RAGE, like all Clinton haters, has no idea how Hillary would lead, he just needs you to believe he does, so he can launch one more last ditch effort to derail her campaign, with with the usual, unbearable and tedious rancor, with which repubilcans talk, delusionally, among themselves, about their common enemies.  Clinton may have a few areas where her experience is lacking, but she’ll make up the deficit in record time, probably faster than her husband, during the crucifixion republicans instigated against him, for half the duration of his tenure as president.  You fear Hillary.  That’s the only reason you continue to bore one another with your rants against her.  You may yet defeat her, with phony polls, media smears and lies, and the constant drivel delivered against her on the internet.  But, win or lose, Hillary has singlehandedly revealed what a bunch of fakes and losers you all are.

Let’s shame the devil. Unelectable Hillary has no more experience at being the President than any of the other candidates against whom she is competing. Would she be able to walk into an operating room and perform a complex surgery from just having been married to a top surgeon? I think NOT! America has endured enough Presidency for Dummies. We can’t take another chance on another ill-equipped neophyte wrongly determining that the job is that simple. Being the President of the United States of America is NOT EASY! In the best of times, it’s difficult and very demanding.

Hillary is not Bill in an Anne Klein pantsuit. Bill was a Rhodes’ Scholar and the consummate politician. Bill could have sold brimstone and treacle to folks in hell. Bill had a 65% approval rating during his impeachment. Meanwhile, Hillary was duped by Dumya into supporting the Iraq occupation. Now, I don’t know that Bill would not have supported Dumya’s unilateral aggression for oil. But, I’m certain Big Dog would have squirmed out of the predicament a lot more unscathed than Hillary has. And, I doubt if Big Dog would have followed that mistake with his support of the Kyl-Lieberman Bill. Slick Willy had done plenty for Arkansas as Governor before coming to the White House. Hillary has been little more than a placeholder in the Senate for New York. Truth be told, I don’t recall Big Dog leaving a dog fight as chewed up as Hillary has left debates slanted in her favor. Rethugnican combatants had NOTHING for the Big Dog in any fight. Thus, WE WILL NEVER HAVE IN HILL WHAT WE ENJOYED IN BILL!!!!!

I liked Hillary better when she was still reasonably progressive in the causes she supported, back when she was Eleanor to Big Dog’s Franklin. Here lately, she’s working my nerves with all these claims to experience she does not have, bolstered by all this blatantly solicited validation of her charming character. The only time a person needs character witnesses is when one’s character is seriously challenged. What’s up, where she needs to so obtrusively solicit certification of her warmth and approachability? The gender card with all the whining about her opponents going after the front-runner is way played too. Surely, she realizes that the top is always the target of the bottom.

She’d be a lot more tolerable if she were arguing important issues about which voters are actually concerned, instead of snarkily claiming an entitlement to an office by virtue of her husband’s public service, or opportunistically twisting wedge issues that have little bearing on the majority of her constituents. No one really gives a rip whether she prefers pearls to diamonds. We are interested in whether she prefers the extension of more government doles to corporations over doling money to education and housing for our struggling masses. We want to know if her legacy is going to be one where public officials continue to receive the healthcare vetoed in S-CHIP. Under Hillary, will Congress and the Senate get another raise while our seniors lose more Social Security, Medicare, and prescription drug benefits? What does she plan to do about unregulated business practices, predatory lenders, the losses of Taft-Hartley, Habeas Corpus, the CONSTITUTION, and the Bill of Rights? What are her plans to rescind the Patriot Act? America is worse off now than during Reagan and Bush41. Hillary can’t use Bill’s track record to win. The expectation is that she, like all the other runners in this Marathon, leap every hurdle without complaining that her legs are shorter than her opponents.

America is not setting a Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton pattern here. It’s only going to be Hillary’s turn when she can prove to the voters that she is unquestionably the next President of the United States of America. So far, Hillary has yet to convince the nation that she is anything more than an overly ambitious former first lady.

Of al the moronic justifications for denying someone the presidency, this one of saying that we’ve had enough of Bush/Clinton/Bush/?  Sorry, but your stupidity is showing.  You didn’t say a word, when the Bush name (Bush being a “true” continuation of a family, father followed by son)was in offie first as VP, then as President, then his son as President.  Now that Clinton has only been in once, you pretend it’s a problem.  If Jeb had run for president, you’d have a fifth term, and, by that time, one of W’s daughters could run, and you’d theoretically have a 6th term, and you bozos wouldn’t have said a word.  But now, a democrat is running, and it’s a woman (god forbid), so now we’re worried about dynasties.  Bullcrap. You hate Hillary because she’s a democrat, and she’s a woman.  She’s certainly not a Clinton.  She’s a Rodham.  She’s only a Clinton by law, now by blood, because tradition requires that the wife adopt surname of her husband.  Dynasty is defined in the dictionary, as a “family” or a “group” that has been in power for an extended period.  1) Clinton has only been in power once. 2) Hillary is not a Clinton.  3) Hillary hasn’t even won the presidency.  4) This isn’t a dynasty; it’s neither a “group” or a “family” that’s being continued.  Hillary is not related to Clinton, except by law.

No More Bushes! No More Clintons!  No More!!!!!!!!!!!!!  Someone different, please…

The Clintons are smart enough and they are popular with useless rich people.  But, they have never demonstrated that they have anything above the average in integrity.

A another Alien movie and another Hillbilly run at the Presidency. America, what a country of sad sequels we’ve become.

Leaving aside the usual boring and nauseating drumbeat of rightwingers, dripping with hatred and jealousy over the Clintons, what is Robinson fretting about?  I understand that he, and the rag he works for, is republican territory, but why the silly pretense that there’s something wrong with a president’s mate, having a say in policy?  Who cares?  The history of the presidency is filled with examples where the president’s wife was influential, or was careful to conceal the fact, in policy decisions.  You can’t be serious.  I can’t believe the conservatives are in such a state of upheaval, that they’re resorting to such nonsense in their desperate efforts to bring Hillary down.  Do I need to point out, that what matters, is the quality and wisdom of the policy results we get from the Clintons if Hillary wins the White House.  Apparently most of the people that make such inane and uninformed comments on this site, are unaware that Hillary was a constant and highly insightful and influential presence in the decision making that occured in Bill Clinton’s tenure.

BILL GET OUT OF HILLARY’S WAY!

It’s very clear that Bill Clinton does not want Hillary to become the president and is doing his best to undermine her campaign. He keeps making stupid statements - even for him - and he has been know to make a few.

“I tell you, I did not have the presidency with that woman.” He can’t stand the thought that she might upstage him.

She may have to just dump him to become free!

Maybe Hillary will hire Monica to keep Bill ‘busy’.

Fair or not, there’s only two roles the media can proscribe for Bill Clinton:

1.) Obedient manservant.

2.) Usurper to the throne.

(I’m being charitable, insert your regionally appropriate dialog as needed)

If Bill assumes the role of First Gentleman, can anybody resist the image of his doing pennance for Monicagate?

And if Bill takes the more likely approach of being his wife’s Dick Cheney and inserting himself into the national dialog when Hillary stumbles, can anyone resist calling him a pirate?

Margret Thatcher’s husband was a thoroughly trained and tested house mouse. He was no risk to her, or the nation.

But, in “rolling the dice” on Hillary, aren’t the odds in favor of any national agenda being swallowed by Bill’s percieved or actual behavior?

You make to point that the Constitution provides for one president, not two.  There are presidents, take the current president and vice president.  Not that the current administration is an example of it working, but clearly we had situations where we had a president and a very strong person in the administration that makes up the presidency.