|
|||
|
Gore Vidal on the Democratic Debate DebaclePosted on Dec 18, 2007
By Gore Vidal I don’t know how many of you were as appalled as I was at the way that the presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich was totally erased from the last Democratic debate held in Iowa. This was a decision that was made, I can tell, jointly by the one-time voice of AIPAC, Mr. Wolf Blitzer, and, at the same time, The Des Moines Register—or whatever it is called—a paper of no consequence for the United States of America. Elements of right-wingism are keeping his voice from being heard, even though there are many millions of us (Kucinich is ahead of both Biden and Dodd in the national polls) out here who like to hear his voice. He is in the great tradition of the original People’s Party of the 1880s; he is in the tradition of George Washington and of Thomas Jefferson, and to silence him with a bunch of political hacks who have made such a mess of our political system, pretending these were the only voices who could talk as presidential candidates ... is it because of their campaign budgets? Now, I know, as all of you know, that people can come in with millions of dollars, like Romney and so on, and can buy time in Iowa and in the North Pole or wherever it is they are running. They can buy it, but to get an honest member of Congress speaking out for the people of the country is a great and rare thing. I have listened to many political debates in my lifetime, if I may pull rank because I have been around longer than anybody else, and here is a voice not only against the war but the entire course leading us to it. I haven’t heard anybody who has ever listened to Kucinich who didn’t say, “Oh yes, yes, what he says is true, but nobody will ever take him seriously.” Well, of course nobody will ever take him seriously, because they won’t let him on TV to stand side by side with the other candidates—some of them attractive candidates but whose roots are not as deep as his in what we may call “American life.” Dennis Kucinich was brought up in poverty, something the other candidates talk about but he actually lived through. He has known poverty in the richest country on Earth, a country that is constantly boasting, that seems to be out of control with self-love. Well, I say let’s have less self-love and pay some attention to our serious critics—and he is one—and his is a voice that’s showing us how to get to the exit from the box that we are all in. Advertisement New and Improved CommentsWe are launching a major overhaul of our comments section. In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread. Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts. Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with. Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page. |
By i,Q, December 20, 2007 at 3:30 am Link to this comment
In the interest of providing some context for PatrickHenry’s obsession with the Israeli Lobby, you can read about The National Alliance and decide for yourself if the information he suggests we glean from their website might have a certain bias to it.
Americans come in all shapes, sizes, colors, creeds, and degrees of intelligence. i am continually dismayed by the outspoken factions who want to exclude all but those they most resemble, this debate not withstanding. It is shameful that Kucinich was excluded, his voice has been a nice dose of sanity in the last two presidential races.
...liberty for all.
Report thisBy troublesum, December 20, 2007 at 3:18 am Link to this comment
How breathtakngly naive Ron Paul’s supporters are. They keep talking about some sort of partership between Kucinich and Paul who are at opposite ends of the political spectrum. It’s that lack of attention to the political process that’s gotten us where we are now. “Flip a coin” to decide who gets what after they win? Will they be wearing their tinfoil hats?
Report thisBy Claudio-Miguel, December 19, 2007 at 9:59 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I totally agree: CNN has become a really PUKE PUKE PUKE news organization.
However, MSNBC is NOT far behind.
When TIMMY RUSSERT asked Kucinich about UFO’S in the debate where he was the MODERATOR, I thought that was one of the most stupid questions ever.
I feel it was asked to make KUCINICH look like a NERD/STAR-TREKY/ etc.
Totally out of line.
The MEDIA really sucks in this Country. Not one MODERATOR really asks the TOUGHT questions to MITT ROMNEY regarding his MORMONISM!! WHY? Is this the 3rd rail in debates?
Lawrence O’Donnel really hit the nail on the head re: ROMNEY’S CULT RELIGION on the McLaughlin Group a few weeks ago.
When the MEDIA really asks tough questions (PISS MATHEWS likes to think HE DOES) then they will approach MORMONISM/ISLAM/NAFTA etc. I remember the time PISS MATHEWS had Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhnold NATZINEGGER on and he (Mathews) did everything but GENUFLECT and KISS HIS CLASS RING. He really played SOFTBALL and NOT HARDBALL that time.
I would vote for KUCINICH anyday. He is the ONLY one that addresses the issues and is NOT afraid to speak the truth.
Claudio-Miguel
Report thisBy Carstie, December 19, 2007 at 9:23 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Dennis Kucinich and Ron Paul are truthspeakers. Both want us immediately out of Iraq. Paul even wants to dump the private bankster owned Federal Reserve. Neither is considered a particular friend of the Zionist state in Palestine. Thus, all the powers-that-be and all their toadies, lickspittles, apologists, prostiticians and media whores totally despise both of these true Americans.
Report thisBoth the Republicrats and the Democans are controlled from the top down. Look at the symbology of the eye over the pyramid on the back of the $1 Federal Reserve monopoly money to see how this works. What we need is not more bipartisanship (which is B.S. with a few extra letters added to fool the folks.) What we do need is a T R A N S P A R T I S A N coalition led by Paul and Kucinich, with Cynthia McKinney, Bob Barr, Patrick Buchanan , Mike Gravel and Gore Vidal as pre-designated Cabinet members.
Upon election Kucinich and Paul could flip a coin to decide who gets the presidency and who becomes the V.P. They could contractually divide the presidential powers in a “pre-nuptial” agreement.
Such a grand coalition of truth-speakers and truth-seekers would appeal to all segments of American society except for the parasites who have risen to the top of virtually each and every major institution, thanks to their personal levels of greed and the corruptible power of the hidden hand of privately-controlled issuance of money.
By Marcus, December 19, 2007 at 9:04 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
James Wolfensohn, former chief honcho of the World Bank was replaced by Paul Wolfowitz. For his noble services on behalf of the American Israeli Political Action Council (AIPAC) and the Controlled Noose Network (CNN); when may we expect Wolf Blitzer to continue the honorable tradition of the ulvine predatory gene by being named the next World Bankster-in-Chief?
Report thisBy it doesn't take a village, December 19, 2007 at 8:51 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
#121395 by VillageElder on 12/19 at 7:31 pm
“Im fascinated by the support and admiration given by liberals and progressives to Rue Paul. Read his web site, if nothing more. He wants to limit the federal governments act ivies to collecting tariffs a providing for the common defense, and possibly a post office…”
VillageElder, The intent, spirit, honesty and humility of Ron Paul’s dignified presentations have all been distorted by you for whatever reason. I am a harsh critic of most of the two-Party candidates but base my argument on fact, quote, intent, clarity of planning. When you distort the candidate’s views, you diminish yourself. On abortion for example, Dr.Paul, if enabled by the Supreme Court, would require that each State pass its own legislation in the matter, the Constitution tasking States with precedence over Federal rule. He does, it’s true, find the practice of infant-torture intolerable in any advanced civilization but his personal conviction in this will not override his dedication to simply governing according to the Constitution.
Report thisBy troublesum, December 19, 2007 at 8:08 pm Link to this comment
Chomsky on media, democracy and the internet: http://www.zmag.org/chomsky/sld/sld-1-09.html
Too many people here are writing essays instead of making comments. It says “Add Your Comment” not “Publish Your Manuscript.”
Report thisBy VillageElder, December 19, 2007 at 7:31 pm Link to this comment
I may have to stop working so I’ll have the time to respond to these stories as they come out.
Always good to read remarks from Gore. His tiff with William F. Buckley was delightful to read.
We saw Rue Paul’s blimp cruising about today. It’s white and says Ron Paul. I’m fascinated by the support and admiration given by liberals and progressives to Rue Paul. Read his web site, if nothing more. He wants to limit the federal government’s act ivies to collecting tariffs a providing for the common defense, and possibly a post office. Big supporter of states’ rights let the states decide everything. He is opposed to abortion and contraception. This means he sees no right to privacy being constitutionally derived.
Let’s look a Kucinich. He espouses the programs which are desired by the majority of Americans. Remember in polling on individual questions the American public is far more progressive than the dems. The public agrees with us; they don’t have a comfortable way to express these feeling because of the political, social, educational and religious indoctrination fed to them. The right wing nuts (repugs) simply bray socialism.
Strangely government’s bail out of failed corporate capitalism is just the American Way preserving the invisible hand of the free market. Nothing like relying on an 18th century economic fantasy and the fiction of Ayn Rand to provide economic guidance.
The MSM is a corporate animal much as we may enjoy Keith on MSNBC that is a partnership of Microsoft and General Electric. There’s some corporate capitalism for you. Kucinich represents a real threat. His comments could wake up a pissed off populace which could lead to real change. Mike Gravel and Rue Paul are challenging the fantasy so they too must be marginalized. Yes, I missed Mike’s comments.
We should stop referring to these lightening rounds as debates. Serious issues are not discussed. There is no proposition being discussed in an attempt to determine a course of action or principle. Kuncinich, Gravel and Paul tend to speak their minds. Hence the excitement someone on the stage is speaking truth as they perceive it. Speaking with conviction and challenging the status quo fairy tale. That’s exciting.
Remember repugs and dems at the party level are not us. The higher they rise in the party and in government as elected or appointed officials (offals?) the less they are like us and the more they are concerned about seeing that we follow the rules maintaining status quo.
Report thisBy PatrickHenry, December 19, 2007 at 6:55 pm Link to this comment
#121374 by Enzymeluv
As far as who controls the U.S. media and the extreme attempts to have Kucinich and Paul campaigns marginalized.
http://www.natvan.com/who-rules-america/
Motive: Kucinich and Paul will pull U.S. forces out of Iraq and the mideast, tensions will ease with Iran, the price of oil will fall $20 a barrel and demand for arnaments will drop.
The state of Israel will have to fight its own battles with its own money and people.
Report thisBy Louise, December 19, 2007 at 6:51 pm Link to this comment
I can’t contribute anything to this excellent article, or to any of these comments, but I feel a need to comment on the photo.
Cant decide.
Which does this photo remind me of, a bunch of wired to their stands Collectible Barbie’s, or the new line of all male Brats?
Since I am fonder of Brats [as it appears are most of the kids who play with them] I think I’ll go with Collectible Barbie’s.
Just like this lineup of “candidates,” Collectible Barbie’s are created by someone else. Molded by someone else. Painted by someone else. Dressed by someone else. Posed by someone else. And placed in exactly the market niche someone else thinks they should be in.
Useful only as something to be kept in the box, out of sunlight and lovingly preserved until their value has increased enough to put them on eBay.
When will we see this lineup on eBay?
Report thisBy fact checker, December 19, 2007 at 6:43 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
While I like Rep Kucinich, I feel Mr Vidal should perhaps get his facts straight before firing off a painfully incorrect essay.
Report thisCNN and Fox only simulcasted the Register’s/ Iowa Public Television Debate. NEITHER network had ANY editorial control over the broadcast(s). CNN’s debates have included Rep Kucinich, the last was from Las Vegas.
On a personal note, I’m sorry to hear about the death of Mr. Kucinich’s Brother, Perry, my thoughts are with his family tonight.
By 911truthdotorg, December 19, 2007 at 6:33 pm Link to this comment
You’d think or hope that at least one of these cowards, if not all of them, would have stepped up and demanded that Dennis be included in the debate.
Now we know the true character of these “candidates”.
What we have to choose from in 2008 - my God.
Report thisBy laughoutloud, December 19, 2007 at 6:30 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Can it be more obvious that the democratic party is following right in step with what the bush adminstration is doing?
Report thisBy Captain Peachfuzz, December 19, 2007 at 6:26 pm Link to this comment
Kucinich used his ‘04 campaign to find himself a wife. It’s true, google it! So why should anyone take him seriously? God help us should he do to the whole country what he did to Cleveland!
Report thisBy Enzymeluv, December 19, 2007 at 6:13 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
What are all you people talking about? You should be more interested in Britney Spear’s sister’s pregnancy and her perverted adolescent behavior. Forget about the Iowa Kucinich debacle, the main stream media wants to divert our attention from the stories that have real meaning. Hmmm, I wonder who owns the mainstream corporate media? Could it be the same thugs that are manipulating the media channels in Iowa?
Report thisBy Enzymeluv, December 19, 2007 at 6:11 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
What are all you people talking about? You should be more interested in Britney Spear’s sister’s pregnancy, and what you are going to tell your children about her perverted adolescent behavior. Forget about the Iowa Kucinich debacle, the main stream media wants to divert our attention from the stories that have real meaning. Hmmm, I wonder who owns the mainstream corporate media? Could it be the same thugs that are manipulating the media channels in Iowa?
Report thisBy Rick Cain, December 19, 2007 at 5:25 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
The establishment is afraid of populist candidates. Their best weapons is manipulation of the press. You can’t vote for a populist (kucinich or paul) if he’s not on the ballot or if he’s not in the poll.
As for the anti-semitic stuff of the extreme left, it is a tad misguided. I am a far leftist and don’t blame israel for anything, its the christian fundamentalist protestants that are responsible.
Report thisBy PatrickHenry, December 19, 2007 at 5:18 pm Link to this comment
Would you consider this a conspiracy? It is happening right before our eyes.
Kucinch represents real change, he must not of passed some sort of litness test mainstream Americans are unaware of, some ring he did not kiss.
I wonder whose ring that was.
Report thisBy richard locicero, December 19, 2007 at 5:14 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I’m sorry but after reading a lot of the comments here I get the distinct impression that a lot of the correspondents here are eager readers of the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion.”
Or am I just naive and there’s a jew in the woodpile causing all the misery in this world?
Get serious comrades!
Report thisBy troublesum, December 19, 2007 at 5:12 pm Link to this comment
Today Hillary Clinton started a tour of Iowa to show her “warm fuzzy side” as the main stream media put it. This election farce is insulting to every American citizen. I’ve seen high school student body elections with more substance.
Report thisBy Joe, December 19, 2007 at 5:10 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
#121288 by Jason on 12/19 at 11:29 am
“The exclusion of Kucinich is an outrage and further exemplifies the erosion of our democracy…”
Jason, the major Democrat candidates call the shots on this. No one else has the influence or motives. It seems to have started this year when Senator Gravel humiliated Hillary Clinton at the debate re her vote to, in effect, attack another peaceful nation: Iran. Her continuing laughter after he described the shame he felt at her vote was astonishing to me. The suffering of millions in the balance and she thinks its funny.
Report thisBy Gary Vey, December 19, 2007 at 4:26 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I used to read articles on websites like RENSE.COM and think they were horribly anti-semitic. Then I got angry and decided to refute the stories about main stream media and the US politic being controlled by Israel. I spent time researching all the claims and became convinced that it’s even worse than we have been told. Of course, you cannot say this or people will use the anti-semitic tag. In fact, you cannot even ask questions about dual-citizenship, the AIPAC or policies that benefit Israel to the detriment of America—your comments and questions either will never be published or they will be commented so as to describe you as a “kook.” How did things ever get so bad? More importantly, where is all of this leading America?
Report thisBy Jeffrey, December 19, 2007 at 3:38 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Exclusion of Dennis Kucinich and Mike Gravel in the debate is a perfect example of media dystopian because of a propaganda-ploy media tool which powerful elite attempts to control society thru the manipulation and censorship in order to support elite wishes. Money buys democracy which benefits for few privileged with enormously lobby supports. Remove CNNs Wolf Blitzer and AIPAC backers from media because they made their dangerous media disinformation tools with unfairly bias. As a proof, CNN is Corrupted News Network.
Report thisBy Jeffrey, December 19, 2007 at 3:36 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Exclusion of Dennis Kucinich and Mike Gravel in the debate is a perfect example of media dystopian because of a propaganda-ploy media tool which powerful elite attempts to control society thru the media manipulation and censorship in order to support elite wishes. Money buys democracy which benefits for few privileged with enormously lobby supports. Remove CNNs Wolf Blitzer and AIPAC backers from media immediately because they made their dangerous media disinformation tools with unfairly bias. As a proof, CNN is Corrupted News Network.
Report thisBy FreeSchmuntry, December 19, 2007 at 3:21 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Re: Ariel Sharon—-
Report thisWhy are they still keeping that bloated walrus alive?
By cyrena, December 19, 2007 at 3:06 pm Link to this comment
#121243 by jackpine savage
Jackpine,
I agree 100% and I thank you for your thoughtful reply. That is especially true for the awakening of the fringes, and bringing us (united any way we can become) out of the periphery and back into the mainstream where we all belong. So, I can have no quarrel with that.
Besides that, any debates between them would surely prove to be a much needed civics education for the mainstream as well. Its really so amazing, (and frightening) to me, to realize how very little most of us actually know about our system of government. Maybe because its been screwed up for so long, that its all the latest of our generations even know, or maybe its because they never learned it to begin with, or maybe its just the obvious fallout from a system that has disenfranchised so many.
I suppose there could be jillions of reasons. In the end, if it brings the truth to light, that itself would be a huge relief. Maybe then, we could get on with things.
Thanks again.
Report thisBy Steve Ilievski, December 19, 2007 at 3:02 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
At this point there is just one way for Americans or anyone else in the world to have real democracy. He who controls the purse (taxes) has the wealth. He who controls the guns (army) has the power. He who controls the media (MSM) has the voice. You want democracy? you will have to take it. There is no way around it. What will you do when they tell you Mr. Paul died from a heart attack because he was old and frail and just couldn’t handle all that stress? Are you going to say, “Yeah OK”.
Report thisBy Sarvananda Bluestone, December 19, 2007 at 2:57 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Thank you Gore Vidal. The hypocrisy and jello backbones of the Democratic leadership is one of the reasons I do not call myself a “liberal”. As a teenager during the McCarthy period I was a son of leftists. I saw the “liberals” carry on the work of McCarthy even after he was out of power. They are always trying to show how patriotic and righteous they are. Call me a progressive. Call me a radical. But never, never call me a liberal.
Report thisBy Julie7, December 19, 2007 at 2:22 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Until people drop the mental categories devised by Tavistock power brokers, we are getting nowhere. They play on bigotries people have against each other. Just as they play one nation against another.
I’ve read Vidal before and like him, but even he falls into these mindtraps like “right-wingism.”
Report thisBy John J Wernsdorfer, December 19, 2007 at 2:07 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I have read and browsed through all the comments above. I must say that I’m in agreement in some part with with all of them. I’m especially encouraged to hear more speaking out against the very profound and dangerous Iraeli influence on our politics. For example the “I” after Senator Joseph Lieberman should not be a designation
Report thisof “Independent” but rather “Israel”. Most of us who see this connection, as well as the politicians who accept the AIPAC money, are surely intimidated against speaking out by the possibility of character assination of being anti-semitic because of the telling truth. Akin to no discussion of Oil and Israel re. the Iraq invasion.
So! What to do? Eliminating the electoral college was suggested. Good! The only thing missing is campaign contributions. Not allowing them. How? I haven’t thought that through. However, if that situation exsisted today campaigns would be more truthful, many more could join the fray and men/women such as Dennis Kucinich could become president.
By Tim, December 19, 2007 at 1:18 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I saw Wolfe Blitzer interview David Duke about 6 months ago and he told Mr. Blitzer that he was not a fair broker of news, because he was a former AIPAC lobbist. Looks like David Duke was right.
Report thisBy Melanie Phoenix, December 19, 2007 at 1:00 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
What do you expect people?
Anyone who is speaking out against the behavior of the last few administrations, is completely ignored or smeared.
Wake up America. You do not live in a free and just country any more.
Report thisBy ichthus, December 19, 2007 at 12:38 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Gore, I love you. Live forever, you lover of Liberty.
Report thisBy srelf, December 19, 2007 at 11:57 am Link to this comment
And now Wolf et.al. will have even fewer competing views on what news (and candidates) should be covered: With the recent FCC vote pushed through by sycophantic chairman Kevin Martin, newspaper-broadcast cross-ownership in major media markets around the country was given the green light. This ruling will allow near-unfettered consolidation of local media outlets by some of the largest corporations in America.
Report thisFortunately Congress may not stand for it. New bills to straighten this mess out have been introduced: (H.R.4835) and its companion Senate bill (S. 2332). We should encourage this.
By Terribly Pissed About This!, December 19, 2007 at 11:38 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Whereas I am disgusted that the elusive shadowy “they” snubbed Dennis Kucinich, I am not surprised. It’s the way they play. They could see their way clear to permit that mummox Alan Keyes, who has fractional digit support and a single staff member for his campaign team, to participate in the last Rethugnican debate. But, Dennis, who wins all the liberal, progressive, and independent straw polls state for state, was forbidden to participate. I fail to see the logic or reason for the Kucinich snub. That notwithstanding, no matter who gets the nomination, Dennis Kucinich is my choice, if I have to write him in that fateful Teusday in November 2008.
DENNIS KUCINICH 2008!
Report thisBy Jason, December 19, 2007 at 11:29 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
The exclusion of Kucinich is an outrage and further exemplifies the erosion of our democracy. We should be up in arms about this sort of thing…
Report thisBy Rhonda, December 19, 2007 at 10:55 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Yes, Gore Vidal is right to be outraged, and so am I. Dennis speaks the truth and makes sense. Also, Mike Gravel, like Dennis, sounds like a human when he talks. All this other stuff we hear on so-called debates begins to sound like the trombones in Peanuts videos, which represent the adults speaking.
CNN and Wolf Blitzer don´t really hold debates anyway. Real debates are not just questions and timed answers. I am 57, and I don´t remember any real debates.
I am really tired of the intelligent, articulate, sensible people like Ralph Nader, Dennis Kucinich, and Mike Gravel being marginalized. I wish they would object vigorously, upset the apple cart, sue to be included. Is the media control already that powerful and oblivious to real issues and real Americans? I hope not, but I am very worried about it.
Report thisBy PRGP, December 19, 2007 at 10:49 am Link to this comment
Republican, Democrats, Libertarians, Green - all seem driven by the wrong set of goals and issues. This country must regain its roots of the Bill of Rights and the Constitution. Corporatists, oligarchs, religious wingnuts, purveyors of imperialism and the export of slavery to poor countries - all must be held accountable. Deconstruct the global bankers, deconstruct the multi-national greed mongers, deconstruct the “Wall Street as casino” idiots, tar and feather the Greespans of the world who rape and pillage and then act as if they walk on water, deconstruct the rapine-oriented hedge fund bandits, deconstruct the Fed and IRS and look at the historical and constitutional requirements of government and its funding. Blow up K street and every lobbyist in residence - they are criminals and deserve no quarter.
Sound nasty - look at what has been done to America by the “compassionate conservative” racist, greedy elitists of the right - that’s nasty. The above is just some much needed re-organization - of, by and for the people. Oh, when we’re done - none of the neo-cons get universal health care - they have to go to the middle east, naked, and solve the mess they’ve made.
Report thisBy Margaret Currey, December 19, 2007 at 10:29 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
In response to comment #121215 by gwynn griffith on 12/19.
I see you also watched the PBS program on Nadar, he was told to leave the 2004 debate despite having a ticket and a good reason to be there.
I voted for Ralph in the primary and I believe he was not the spoiler it was the powers in Fla. that took Gore, it was Ohio that took Kerry.
There is an old cree proverb that says first the trees died, then the rivers were poisioned and when the last fish is caught then we will realize that we cannot eat money.
So here in Oregon there was another slide due to clear cutting noone talks about the people affected by the actions of the movers and shakers, you lost your house to a mud slide, too bad but it did give someone a job.
Getting back to Kuncinich he speaks the truth therefore he must be sidelined just like Nadar, does one have to have lots of money for the compaign to get someone who runs the country for the rich and powerful.
In one scene Nadar is asked to quit the person is Michael Moore who at one time was on Nadar’s side.
As one of the volunteers said why would Nadar quit after gathering together supporters who would work for free, is anyone asking Clinton or Obama to quit for the sake of the party I think not.
Democracy is at risk of going to the highest bidder.
Will there be another presidency like that of King George?
Report thisBy karim29007, December 19, 2007 at 10:03 am Link to this comment
On Gore, AIPAC and democracy!!
————————
“We control America”,Arik Scheinerman, known as Ariel Sharon the most ardent Zionist.
Exclusion of Kucinich, Nader and so forth are of no surprises.
America and real Americans have been excluded from the democratic process for almost 60 years.
The consolidated Zionists’ consortium with AIPAC as its CEO, for all practical purposes control every aspects of Americans way of life.
Specifically with the present regime in the W/H all the ‘high value and sensitive appointments’ must be approved by AIPAC.
It was just only last week when NIE reports was allowed to see the light of the day, after being held-up almost for a year.
And having been attacked and rubbished by the Israelis and AIPAC’s agents, such an important matter have disappeared from the “media” completely!
It did not meet the Zionists’ requirements.
But these are just the symptoms.
As it stands, no matter which color-combination occupies the W/H, the Americans will continue to lose their lives in thousands with Iraqis of a million with their country being cantonized and prepared for perpetual destruction and blood-shed.
The said catastrophes are only part of their world domination and to them ‘ends justifies ANY means’.
AIPAC and its associates must be stopped.
Once the cause was cured the symptoms will vanish.
Report thisBy Sonja Coryat, December 19, 2007 at 9:46 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Non Credo is 100% correct. Another rule of the Truth or Consequences reality show (debate) is that none of the contestants must ever say AIPAC. Mike Gravel let the AIPAC word slip just once and was never seen from again. The contestants are frightened to death that they might slip out the word. That’s why Blitzer is up there, to make sure they don’t. I hate games that are fixed.
Report thisBy David, December 19, 2007 at 8:52 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I would withdraw from the Democratic Party if were not for Dennis Kucinich. The Democrats have shown every bit as much bad judgement as the Republicans, but in reality they’ve sunk lower, because while the Republicans are warmongering hypocrites, most people know it. The Democrats are actively and deliberately deceiving and betraying their constituents and base, and while Mr. Vidal cites CNN and the Register, I cannot believe that the Democratic Party did not play a role in Kucinich’s exclusion due to the tight race in Iowa. The only way to hit this corporate media is to boycot their sponsors. The MSM is more responsible for destroying this country than the politicians, because if they were doing their jobs, serving the people and reporting the facts, people would act accordingly. In effect this is littel different than state run media. But in whatever ways it is, it is certainly not conducive to democracy.
Report thisBy jackpine savage, December 19, 2007 at 8:22 am Link to this comment
#121172, Cyrena
I take your point. I’m no Paulist, because as much as i like some of the things he says…there’s still a feeling in my gut about him that is frightening.
But, i maintain that a general election between those two candidates would be the best we could have, mostly because they are willing to actually debate and focus on issues. Given that choice, i would almost certainly vote for Mr. Kucinich.
Mr. Kucinich has said that he would entertain the notion of running with Dr. Paul, so i have to assume that there is some commonality of interests and ideals. And i think that such a ticket would bring some balance to both candidates.
I’ve said this before: the important part about the Ron Paul phenomenon is not Ron Paul but the phenomenon. The fringes are always restless, but he is either uniting most of the fringes or the fringes are seeping into the mainstream. It seems to me that the short shrift given to Paul and Kucinich amounts to quiet repression.
I believe that if some of these forces are not channeled now, towards something at least more positive than what we have, then the next time we see them they will be destructive.
Report thisBy Conservative Yankee, December 19, 2007 at 8:15 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
121227 by craig on 12/19 at 7:15 am
“You would think that a country that purports to be a democracy…”
As ubiquitous as it is incorrect, most folks (because of our media, and government controlled educational system) believe the US was set up as a “democracy.” It wasn’t. It isn’t even a “full” republic, it is a representative republic with restraining conditions (such as provision for marshal law, the electoral college, and suspension of some constitutional rights for those “excepted” for age, military status, or criminal history.
In a “democracy” the full population would vote on every issue. There would be no “president, Senate, nor House. There would be no “Supreme court” and every ruling by district courts would be at the pleasure of the entire populous… Democracy is a LOT of work, so the capitalist founders decided they would hire folks to vote their interests. because the founders distrusted the working underclass, they erected the electoral college in case the majority of poor folks got together and selected someone unfriendly to capitalism.
It’s a real good system for keeping things static!
Report thisBy sonja coryat, December 19, 2007 at 7:31 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
They ought to call these debates “Truth or Consequences.” A new and updated game on TV. The rules of the game are—if you tell the truth, you must pay the consequences, which is you will be eliminated. First one to go was Mike Gravel, who is so honest he was almost jerked off the stage. Next oe down was Kucinich, who just disappeared. Hillary will last because she’s an expert at speaking with split tongue. I lost interest in the game.
Report thisBy Expat, December 19, 2007 at 7:26 am Link to this comment
Auw crap, many posts, redundant, the last post is the one…......nuts. my inet is screwed.
Report thisBy craig, December 19, 2007 at 7:15 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Until we do away with the “electoral college” America will only have “selected” representation. Until the MSM is broken up, we will only have the electoral college, caucuses, and unbrokered conventions.
You would think that a country that purports to be a democracy would arrange some system that accurately accounts for the desires of it’s people. But we have nothing like that system.
Dennis being denied his opportunity to debate is just further proof that we do not live in anything like a democracy.
The idea that eight years has passed since the 2000 election, and we still haven’t installed a nationwide polling system that can be relied upon tells me that screwed up elections is exactly what the powers that be want.
The only thing they would enjoy more is if we all just stayed home and didn’t bother. Or, better yet, moved and let them carry on turning America into a slave hostel for third world refugees and robber barrons.
Report thisBy adamjohn12, December 19, 2007 at 7:11 am Link to this comment
Ha!
This is the same Vidal, in a TRUTHDIG interview with Scheer, stoking himself talking about how President Hilary would be great…
I visit this site exclusively for the front row seats to watch the bourgeois waffling…
lol.
Keep up the good fight Gore! Vote Hilary!, err I mean Dennis! err, go Social Programs! (but I still want my pool!)
Report thisBy Expat, December 19, 2007 at 6:43 am Link to this comment
Ahhhh, Expat in wonderland.
Report thisAll of the other candidates ask, Where are Kucinich and Paul? Why arent they here with us? We want to win because we are the peoples choice, not because of media bias and exclusion. We wont debate until all of us are here .
Expat, Expat, wake up. Its time to go to work. Ah, ah, hi honey, I just had the most extraordinary dream. What time is it?
“It’s late.”
“Yeah, I know.”
By Expat, December 19, 2007 at 6:37 am Link to this comment
Ahhhh, Expat in wonderland.
Report thisAll of the other candidates ask, Where are Kucinich and Paul? Why arent they here with us? We want to win because we are the peoples choice, not because of media bias and exclusion. We wont debate until all of us are here .
Expat, Expat, wake up. Its time to go to work. Ah, ah, hi honey, I just had the most extraordinary dream. What time is it?
By Expat, December 19, 2007 at 6:34 am Link to this comment
Ahhhh, Expat in wonderland. All of the other candidates ask, Where are Kucinich and Paul? Why arent they here with us? We want to win because we are the peoples choice, not because of media bias and exclusion. We wont debate until all of us are here .Expat, Expat, wake up. Its time to go to work. Ah, ah, hi honey, I just had the most extraordinary dream. What time is it?
Report thisBy Conservative Yankee, December 19, 2007 at 6:27 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
121186 by 13 Martyrs on 12/19 at 1:56 am
“While I am not much of a Kucinich fan, I agree that the likes of CNN and the Register did push him out of the way for whatever agenda they have.”
What I find strange is that while most people blame the Dr & CNN for the absence of Kucinich and Gravel, I haven’t heard criticism of the D party, or the remaining candidates on this particular issue!
The Republicans are behaving well in this area keeping Alan Keyes, Tom Tancredo & Duncan Hunter, but the Democrat field is thinning. Look to the parties if you want to cast blame. THEY decide who will debate and who will not!
Report thisBy gwynn griffith, December 19, 2007 at 6:20 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
This smells of the 2004 election when the same thing was done to Ralph Nader…another truly great American. He was marginalized by the system…just as Kucinich & Gravel have been. Corporate American at work !!
Report thisBy Fools on the Hill, December 19, 2007 at 6:17 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
More disappointing than the Des Moines Register and Wolf Blitzer are the candidates, up on the stage, who claim they have the right leadership skills yet, remained silent as if Denise doesn’t even exist.
At the very least, I thought Edwards and Obama would refuse to attend and participate unless Denise was included. Leadership requires taking personal risk and standing on principle. Both have claimed they will fight special interests and fix a corrupt and broken system. We are left wondering just when does their fight begin? If they are too weak to fight the Des Moines Register and Wolf Blitzer, we shouldn’t expect too much from them in the future.
Report thisBy Larry Brandes, December 19, 2007 at 5:43 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
It is obvious to me now, the only candidates that even get a chance to be heard are nothing more than dupes, Illuminati stooges.
Report thisBy Sonja Coryat, December 19, 2007 at 5:10 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
The only two candidates who make any sense and who consistently speak the truth—Kucinich and Mike Gravel—have been eliminated from the debates. I find this sinister. Anybody who tells it like it is in this country just doesn’t stand a chance of getting elected. It’s terribly hopeless.
Report thisBy John Borowski, December 19, 2007 at 4:08 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
The reason the Republicans (Aka Conservatives right wingers) and the I & M complex are in the love bed with Kucinich and Obama is because they are easier to perpetrate voting fraud on the American people than Clinton. Kucinich and Obama are good people solidly for the American people. This is the main reason why they will never see the presidency. The Electoral College (Spokesmen for the royalty in Great Britain and Europe) has the absolute power to install a president. Since the dictatorship began in this country only the extreme right or the middle of the road Democrat (Like Clinton) has any chance of winning. People like Kucinich and Obama are anathema to the I & M complex because most things good for Americans inversely is bad for the interest of the Republicans (Aka Conservatives right wingers) and the I & M complex. The Republicans (Aka Conservatives right wingers) and the I & M are trying to lead the sheep down the Kucinich or Obama road because they know it is a dead-end.
Report thisBy Dr. Knowitall, PhD, PhD, December 19, 2007 at 3:47 am Link to this comment
There is no debate or dialogue in America. Soundbites and Slogans that the media tell us are debates.
I bet most Americans, if asked to define debate, would say, “it’s when Wolfie asks presidential candidates questions and they answer.”
No wonder issues get either distorted or obscured.
They’re all liars, hiding something.
Report thisBy Dr. Knowitall, PhD, PhD, December 19, 2007 at 3:46 am Link to this comment
There is no debate or dialogue in America. Soundbites and Slogans that the media tell us are debates.
I bet most Americans, if asked to define debate, would say, “it’s when Wolfie asks presidential candidates questions and they answer.”
No wonder issues get either distorted or obscured.
Report thisBy Jaded Prole, December 19, 2007 at 3:44 am Link to this comment
If anyone was watching PBS last night, they ran a long documentary on Ralph Nader. The same thing happened to him and other candidates in 2000. What that documentary clearly exposed was that this country is completely broken and the election process corrupted beyond the possibility of legitimacy. The selections are run by an elite cabal of corporate players. They decide who is “viable” and who will be in their prescripted, invitation only “debates” They decide who will get media coverage. What is also showed is that though the corporate elite are the problem, liberals are the obstacle to addressing it and will do everything in their power to prevent progressives from running either within the Democratic party or as independents.
Report thisBy weather, December 19, 2007 at 3:24 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Iam grateful to many of you who post here on TD.
I’ve learned a great deal and am thankful for some of the insights, perspectives and links, but most importantly, grateful for being wrong on many things and have been shown evidence and opinion that challenged even threatened some of my beliefs.
In someways its made me a better citizen and Im most sincere. Thanks again.
Report thisBy SamSnedegar, December 19, 2007 at 2:14 am Link to this comment
I have heard Kucinich say succinctly that oil is the reason for our Iraq adventure. I have never heard Paul say so. I used to hear Gore Vidal say so, but evidently he has joined Bob Scheer in the “used to talk about oil” crowd who have caved to their own publishers and gone mute on the subject.
Unless and until ANY candidate (and Kucinich is the ONLY one who has) is ready to address the “largely about oil” issue, I will remain dubious about his honesty and disgusted with his cowardice.
I also wonder that neither pol nor pundit has ever wanted to find out for sure whether the current President of the United States is a moronic puppet. Surely there is sufficient evidence somewhere which could prove one way or the other whether the occupant of the white house is capable of cogency, but seemingly everyone runs from that subject as well.
Incidentally, Alan Greenspan did comment that the Iraq war was “largely about oil,” but his comment wasn’t exactly that; the thing about which he was complaining was that EVERYONE KNEW IT but refused to TALK about it or even MENTION it. In other words, to him the oil part was a given; the problem was that you couldn’t get it out in the open.
We have the same problem here, and it is extant on Daily Kos and Atrios and Tom Tomorrow and Common Dreams and The Nation and the APJ and Consortium and on and on and on. Apparently they are all afraid that the truth will bring on our Enronization, which of course it might, but there are so many countries tied to our economy that they really can’t let us fail and fall like Enron or Argentina.
You can’t fix a problem you won’t admit you have, and Kucinich is the ONLY candidate who will broach the subject of oil. Isn’t that funny?
Report thisBy 13 Martyrs, December 19, 2007 at 1:56 am Link to this comment
While I am not much of a Kucinich fan, I agree that the likes of CNN and the Register did push him out of the way for whatever agenda they have. I think this goes more towards the election horse race mentality of the press more than anything else and the fact the media prefer to marginalize those not considered to be mainstream. Kucinich often talks in extremes and the media perceive him as a goofball. In reality, though, we live in a time that calls for thinking out of the box. Calling for the impeachment of the president and vice-president and considering the architects of the Iraq war as war criminals is not extreme thinking in my book. It’s a rational approach to begin repairing what damage has been done in the name of our country. CNN and the Register still operate in a vacuum that has no relation to the reality of our times.
http://13martyrs.blogspot.com/
Report thisBy Marycatherine Barton, December 19, 2007 at 1:40 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I knew Wolf used to be the editor of the Jerusalem Post, but never thought of him as being the past spokesperson for AIPAC. He certainly is tireless on CNN, and I have noticed his biases, Thank goodness for Gore Vidal for Kucinichism.
Report thisBy kj*, December 19, 2007 at 1:38 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
They kept him out so he wouldn’t announce his articles of impeachment of Bush (50 pages) to a standing ovation, as he had just done in Reno (of all places).
Report thisBy Thomas Billis, December 19, 2007 at 12:31 am Link to this comment
Mr Vidal like many people puts the blame in the wrong place.We are the problem.We are treated like morons because we elected a moron.We expect to be treated like Rhodes scholars when we elected a guy we would like to have a beer with.If you act like a moron and subsequently get treated like one who is really to blame.
Report thisBy cyrena, December 18, 2007 at 11:46 pm Link to this comment
#121145 by jackpine savage
My only hope anymore is that Reps Kucinich and Paul will be so angered by the slight treatment received from their respective parties that they will join together and run as independents without party affiliation. I do heartily believe that together they could sink both party machines.
I dunno Savage
I think this is a be careful what we wish for moment. Ive heard far too many people speak to the commonalities between Kucinich and Paul, and the truth of the matter is that they dont go any further than the rhetoric on it. Kucinich is speaking truthfully, from his heart and mind, and his actions in Congress have in fact backed him up. So, hes not saying one thing, and doing something else.
On the polar opposite is Ron Paul, who talks a really good game, but its a cover for something far more sinister. So, we arent looking at the difference between a true conservative and a true liberal, at least not ideologically speaking.
Lets take an excellent and recent example: After numerous attempts by a few others (who have since been kicked to the periphery, or out of the state entirely i.e., Cynthia McKinney) Kucinich was willing, able, and courageous enough to put together and present the resolution to impeach Cheney, and basically on his own. (limited support from his own party, and Cynthia had been kicked out of Congress by then). And, RON PAUL was the primary congressional spokesperson to BLOCK it!! And, the WAY that he did it, was via the political sophistries that underhanded people like him, (and true repug) generally use. While PRETENDING (in all of his campaign rhetoric) to be all for the Constitution, blah, blah, blah, and CLAIMING that he too, believes that these thugs should be impeached, he made the move to block Kucinichs resolution, by claiming that it wasnt being done via the standard parliamentary procedure, which is actually not true at all. It was just a standard political trick.
So, there is a very huge difference between Kucinich and Paul, that goes far beyond the difference between a true liberal, and a true conservative, because I dont think those labels are appropriately applied in respect to either of them. Kucinich is far more in favor of maintaining the Constitution, than Ron Paul can ever be, since Ron Paul chooses to ignore huge portions of it, picking and choosing, and applying what he wants, and where he wants. Hes not much concerned with anything that has taken place in the Constitution, beyond the original Bill of Rights, which didnt even recognize people of color as full humans. So, weve had to make some improvement since then. Dennis Kucinich recognizes those changes, and Ron Paul clearly does not. Ron Paul doesnt even wish to recognize the fundamental Establishment clause, which provides for a clear separation of Church and State.
Now of course his rhetoric doesnt speak to that, because he side-steps his way around ALL of these issues, by saying that all of these things should be left up to the States to decide. Well, THAT is highly contrary to the intended purpose of the Constitution for the UNITED States of America.
I would agree that both candidates are being ignored by the corporate media because they do represent a danger to the establishment. And so yes, they fear them both for ostensibly the same reasons. On the other hand, a Ron Paul type return to the Constitution of 1787 would clearly be DANGEROUS to us ALL, and not just the Oligarchy. That is obviously very different from the perceived danger that Kucinich represents to the established power.
So, I dont see them joining together on an independent ticket, unless Kucinich sells out, and I dont see that happening either. He hasnt yet.
Meantime, Ron Paul is downright scary, if only because the average American cant see through the rhetoric, or follow the sophistries of his sleights of hand.
Report thisBy Robert, December 18, 2007 at 10:52 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
The only solution, so far as I see it, is to establish a new system that entirely removes the influence of the corporate/media elite. We see a precursor to it with Ron Paul’s campaign which is more of an internet event than anything else. The online community seems to be organizing around Ron Paul more than any other candidate. Isn’t that true Democracy?
Why can’t we draft our own candidate and put him or her on a national ballot? What rule says that the current method is the only method?
To do this, though, we’ll need to fight tooth and nail to keep the internet free and open. If we can do this then we can create a new primary process. Who cares if the FCC allows media consolidation? We’ll create our own alternate media. It won’t matter how much money someone has. Money won’t have as much power so say goodbye to special interests.
In conclusion, the better Dr. Paul does in this election, the harder you will see these plutocrats demand absolute control of the internet. Am I wrong here?
Report thisBy G.Anderson, December 18, 2007 at 10:42 pm Link to this comment
Seems to me like the only thing that’s been talked about on CNN and elswhere is whose ahead in the polls.
For them that’s the only issue that matters, what the polls say.
The press is like someone with a suspicious lump who is afraid to go to the doctor, because they think they might have cancer. By the time the pain gets so great that they can’t ignore it any longer it’s too late.
The same will be true here, then they’ll bombard us with stories about how things are looking so much better than they were.
The other night I watched V for Vendetta again, the shots of America in a civil war sent shivers up my spine.
Report thisBy GW=MCHammered, December 18, 2007 at 10:27 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Probably why CNN is banned in South Africa. Hopefully, they the rest of the world will ban FOX and all US so-called news networks.
Report thisBy Mike, December 18, 2007 at 10:05 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I did find it fishy during the Vegas debate when Blitzer kept avoiding Dennis and cutting him off. He even skipped Dennis right after he said he would go to him. I didn’t realize it before, but it was obvious at that debate that Wolf was trying to keep Dennis out even though he was there. The best thing though, was that Kucinich made the best of his time and really stood out from the other candidates. What’s sad though, is even when he called Edwards on his China vote, most just giggled like, “oh that wacky Dennis.”
In the end, the American people will get the candidate they deserve. And after re-electing Bush, how could we ever expect America to come around. All I see, beside Dennis Kucinich and Ron Paul, is the same old crap all over again, but with a shiny new wrapper that’s just covering it up.
Peace out.
Report thisBy BlueEagle, December 18, 2007 at 9:26 pm Link to this comment
I have to second Savage. What a joy it would be to see two candidates that want to restore the constitution and rule of law that made America so special. Civil liberties would be restored. Nonsensical wars would end.
Two intelligence men that speak truth to power would battle it out over specific issues on whether free-markets should rule or the government should step in without corporatism dictating policy.
Report thisBy Myopia, December 18, 2007 at 9:22 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Leave it to Gore Vidal to take on and shame the Idiocracy at CNN. And of course they are afraid of Dennis Kucinich. He speaks the truth;something completely alien to Blitzer and Co.
Report thisBy Mitchell Freedman, December 18, 2007 at 9:12 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Vidal hits the nail on the head—as usual. Kucinich is fearless, eminently quotable, and holds positions that a majority of Americans believe. Yet, he is systematically excluded by corporate media outlets and various debates in Iowa in a self-fulfilling prophesy combined with Catch-22 arguments.
I would also ask Gore to comment on the economic royalists’ resurrection of McCain with his endorsements from major newspapers in Iowa and Massachusetts and from the odious Lieberman.
Report thisBy P. T., December 18, 2007 at 8:59 pm Link to this comment
I am still trying to figure out why an ostensibly liberal newspaper did not want Dennis Kucinich around. The paper is backing Hillary Clinton. Does it think that Kucinich embarrasses the corporate Clinton?
Report thisBy jackpine savage, December 18, 2007 at 8:53 pm Link to this comment
Thank you, sir.
There is only one reason for this kind of behavior: ‘they’ are afraid of Rep. Kucinich. The same is happening on the Republican side with Rep. Paul.
This is unfortunate, mostly because at this pivotal moment in American history, the best presidential race i could imagine would be Kucinich v. Paul. I like to imagine the debates between them, real debates between articulate men of conviction. I like to think of the American people choosing between an actual liberal and an actual conservative. It would be a watershed political moment, particularly because it would show the average American that liberals and conservatives can agree on the most fundamental things.
My only hope anymore is that Reps Kucinich and Paul will be so angered by the slight treatment received from their respective parties that they will join together and run as independents without party affiliation. I do heartily believe that together they could sink both party machines. I believe that they could inspire Americans to become involved in the process of governing themselves. And i have little doubt that if they were on every state’s ballot, the mandate would be thunderous.
I suppose that this is why they cannot be allowed to speak. That and the both tend to make their opponents look terrible…which they are.
Report thisPage 2 of 2 pages < 1 2