LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.   Exclusive Truthdig Merchandise - Gore Vidal signed first editions - Signed Mr. Fish prints
November 24, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

For 23 Years, Fully Aware but Mute and Paralyzed

Refuse Allegiance to Coal

Playbill

Obama Risks Losing His Judicial Prize

Lieberman Won't Budge on Health Care

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * To Your Health—and Mine

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Freedom’s Fight: Part II

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Reports

Take Me Out to the BALCO

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Dec 18, 2007

By Eugene Robinson

WASHINGTON—Let’s take a brief respite from politics to consider the elasticity of human potential:

    On April 2, 2002, the Los Angeles Dodgers played a home game against the San Francisco Giants. In the top of the second inning, with two men on base, Dodgers ace Kevin Brown had to face slugger Barry Bonds. Brown blew his first pitch past the game’s best hitter for a called strike. Bonds slammed Brown’s second pitch over the left-center-field fence—his first home run of the year, and number 568 in his storied career.

    It is now assumed, of course, that Bonds may well have been juiced on steroids at the time; the previous year he had set the all-time single-season record of 73 home runs, and his musculature was almost freakishly swollen. But even the baseball fundamentalists who want to excise all of Bonds’ suspect home runs from the hallowed record books should make an exception for number 568, right? Because we now have an allegation that Brown was juiced, too—on human growth hormone and maybe steroids as well.

    If both pitcher and batter are artificially enhanced, doesn’t that level the playing field?

    Brown is one of more than 90 major league players mentioned in former Sen. George Mitchell’s voluminous report on the problem of steroids and other performance-enhancing drugs in the sport once considered our national pastime.

Advertisement

    According to the report, Kirk Radomski—a former New York Mets batboy, equipment manager and hanger-on who became a kind of Dr. Feelgood to the stars—says he routinely shipped quantities of growth hormone to Brown via overnight mail. He claims that Brown, who declined to be interviewed by Mitchell, shipped back wads of cash as payment. A receipt from one of Radomski’s shipments to Brown is reproduced in the report as evidence. Radomski also says that on one occasion he sold Brown a quantity of Deca-Durabolin, which is an anabolic steroid.

    Last summer, as Bonds closed in on the all-time home run record and baseball purists were all but calling for him to be hauled away and waterboarded, I wrote that in terms of steroid use, Bonds was “simply a man of his age.”

    That was an understatement, it turns out.

    Steroid abusers in baseball “range from players whose major league careers were brief to potential members of the Baseball Hall of Fame,” Mitchell reported. He said he could not establish how many players used performance-enhancing substances, but he quotes estimates by former players that range from 20 percent to “at least half.” And among the players specifically named are not just sluggers such as Bonds or Jose Canseco, but also 31 pitchers—including the best pitcher of our time, Roger Clemens, who denies the allegation.

    Let me be clear: People shouldn’t abuse steroids or growth hormones in an effort to improve their athletic performance. These substances are bad for you. They are especially dangerous for kids who seek to emulate their athletic heroes by bulking up to Schwarzeneggerian proportions. Steroids don’t make great athletes out of non-athletes; there’s no pill or injection that will give you the ability to pick up the rotation of the ball as it leaves the pitcher’s hand and discern whether it’s a fastball or a slider.

    Eye surgery might, though. To switch sports for a moment, golfer Tiger Woods—who added muscle the old-fashioned way, in the weight room, and who still has a neck to prove it—had laser surgery that not only remedied his nearsightedness but actually gave him better than 20-20 vision.

    Have any major leaguers with normal vision gone under the laser in an attempt to gain an edge? Wouldn’t submitting healthy eyes to a performance-enhancing operation be just as problematic as taking steroids or growth hormones?

    To switch sports again, as the college and professional football seasons wrap up with bowl games and playoffs, note the size of the linemen. Anything under 300 pounds is considered “small.” Of course, it’s not really healthy to carry around that much weight—and players pay the price when their football careers are over. Yet you can now see 300-pound linemen playing for elite high school programs.

    Meanwhile, there are improved tests for detecting steroids but not for human growth hormone, which increases muscle mass. Does anyone imagine that there is no professional athlete still using the stuff?

    My point is that we, the paying customers, don’t want normal-size athletes with normal abilities. We want to see supermen and superwomen performing super feats, and we’re willing to pay these gladiators a fortune. Why should they disappoint us? Why should we expect them to?

    Eugene Robinson’s e-mail address is eugenerobinson(at)washpost.com.

    © 2007, Washington Post Writers Group


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By blueshift, December 19, 2007 at 11:08 pm #

Selig will be impeached and waterboarded. But the war in Iraq will go on.

Report this

By Frostedflakes, December 18, 2007 at 11:14 pm #

Eugene is right. Other than self righteous banter, Americans would miss the exploits of professional athletes who exceed the perceived natural limits. There has been cheating in professional sports since the gladiators in Rome. Once again, just another distraction for the populace instead of focusing on wars, hunger, illiteracy, treason and corruption. And by the way, since when did Congress have so much spare time to focus on sports as opposed to ending wars and torture.

Report this

By BruSays, December 18, 2007 at 10:57 pm #

Lots of good points made here.

As Paolo, PatrickHenry, the Village Idiot and k-man have all stated or implied, attempting to regulate the use of steroids and (now) HGH among professional athletes is fruitless, if not an inappropriate invasion of the people’s right to use their bodies as they see fit.

At the end of the day, adult men and women whose professional careers can be enhanced or lengthened through the use of these drugs will seek them out and use them, regardless of their legality. As with any drug, abuse can lead to serious medical problems. As with any drug, strict REGULATION (instead of ILLEGALIZATION) is likely the best route. We only need to look back at Prohibition for that lesson.

Heck, if you’re a professional bodybuilder you’re probably laughing at the accusations of “cheater” that basefall fans are throwing at their former idols. To them, those supplements are part and parcel of their culture and attempts to regulate their use by testing - or even by hosting “natural” contests have failed. Everyone knows there’s always a new product out there that can beat the test.

I thought kmorgan brought up a very good point. As a society we reward athleticism; we don’t reward intellectualism. Reminds me of the final years of the Roman Empire…but that’s another story.

Report this

By Paolo, December 18, 2007 at 9:51 pm #

As a libertarian, my view is that, if organized baseball wants to ban steroids and set up mandatory player drug testing, they are free to do so. But where, Oh Ye Alleged Constitutional “Conservatives,” does the Constitution give Congress power to legislate in the area of sports? Likewise, where is the enumerated power to legislate in the area of drugs, medications, and plant extracts?

Organized baseball should be beholden only to one group: the fans who buy the tickets. If, in the judgment of the fans, steroids ruin the game, then fans can vote with their feet and refuse to attend the games. If the owners feel the use of steroids is such a bad PR issue that they want to ban them, they are free to do so.

Because steroids are illegal, a baseball player whose health is ruined by their use has little recourse. If steroids were legal, no one would sell them without a clear legal document itemizing the risks, signed by the player after extensive counseling. The risks, legally, to not having such a signature would be too great.

I am a big fan of so-called “ambulance-chasing” attorneys, as they do a great public service in ferreting out wrongdoers. Such folks would be glad to take on a case of a misinformed ballplayers consuming a legalized drug. When the drug is made illegal, the system no longer works.

Report this

By PatrickHenry, December 18, 2007 at 8:56 pm #

Whats the big deal?

Eat enough hormone enhanced hot dogs and hamburgers and drink enough hormone laced milk and your there.

Report this

By The Village Idiot, December 18, 2007 at 2:37 pm #

I saw a satire that maybe needs to be reexamined; it was the “All-Drug Olympics,” which is pretty self-explanatory.

Why not have two categories of sport: All-Natural, USDA-certified organic and Anything Goes. That way, tech or pharmaceutical innovations can move forward and natural human abilities can also be appreciated, separately. Joining the Anything Goes Olympics is voluntary, and like those using steroids or drugs right now, they are essentially guinea pigs, so as long as they sign the really long liability waiver, let ‘em have at it.

Report this

By k-man, December 18, 2007 at 2:30 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

If they want to destroy their bodies with performance enhancing drugs, so be it. However, they take away accolades that belong to athletes who don’t use drugs. Place an asterisk next to their names if they get in the hall of fame.
Baseball isn’t the only sport affected. Bicycling, track, football and probably any physical sport you can think of has been influenced by this. If we get rid of enhancment drugs, do we want to watch a bunch of slow athletes that will never to surpass the records set by cheaters? If so, ban any athlete that has used enhancment drugs from there sport for life. They don’t deserve to get rewarded for cheating. If you want to watch users or agree it is ok for even blackwater private military personnel to get pumped up and even mess up there minds while holding weapons of destruction, then you have made your bed. Lie in it and watch out for flying bullets!

Report this

By kmorgan, December 18, 2007 at 10:52 am #

My personal opinion is that too much merit is given to sports prowess, and not enough to intellectual pursuits.  This is one of the reasons we are becoming (benefit of the doubt that we’re not already there) a nation of idiots.

Why study to become a scientist or doctor when the big money is in baseball, basketball, football, etc?

With all the steroids these players are using why not just build robots to play?  But then you’d need really smart engineers to build robots to give you the same experience…

The drugs are illegal.  If they want to use them, and are caught, they should be prosecuted, have any monies earned in their sporting career confiscated, and be banned from sports forever.  This way at least they’d know there was a real penalty to be paid for breaking the rules (law).  But hey, that’s just me…

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.