Top Leaderboard, Site wide
July 22, 2014
Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines
Help us grow by sharing
and liking Truthdig:
Sign up for Truthdig's Email NewsletterLike Truthdig on FacebookFollow Truthdig on TwitterSubscribe to Truthdig's RSS Feed





War of the Whales


Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Report

Mr. Personality’s Flaws

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Dec 12, 2007

By Ellen Goodman

BOSTON—Aren’t you beginning to feel just a little sympathy for Republicans? It’s less than a month to the first vote. The Democrats are suffering from an embarrassment of riches. The Republicans are suffering an embarrassment.

    The only commitment problems Democrats are having are between appealing suitors. The Republicans, on the other hand, have the wedding date saved, the room picked and they’re still speed-dating.

    The men keep coming, one after the next, making a pitch and missing.

    Candidate No. 1: John McCain, the man who says what he thinks even if it isn’t popular. But it often isn’t popular. Next!

    Candidate No. 2: Rudy Giuliani, the tough guy from New York. But the thrice-married former mayor can’t get beyond Ground Zero. Next!

Advertisement

Square, Site wide
    Candidate No. 3: Fred Thompson, the actor and politician. But folksy Fred isn’t playing Ronald Reagan, he’s playing Sleepy, or is it Grumpy? Next!

    Candidate No. 4: Mitt Romney, the smoothie endorsed by National Review as the “full-spectrum conservative.” Alas, Mitt’s covered the spectrum by flip-flopping his way across the rainbow. Next!

    Now Mike Huckabee is jogging over to the table. The (second) man from Hope has risen in the polls as fast as a wedding cake in the oven. He’s this week’s front-runner for the uncharacteristically fickle GOP.

    I confess to a certain weakness for Mike, the sort of weakness that women admit for a man who makes them laugh. The affable pastor, the “recovering foodaholic,” the bass guitarist for Capitol Offense, Huckabee once actually trademarked the name “Positive Alternatives.”

    In his mocking ad with Chuck Norris, in his populist posture on poverty, in his green-ish talk of being a good steward of the Earth, he’s presented himself as the positive alternative. “I’m a conservative but I’m not mad at everybody over it,” he told Jon Stewart. That was after he dropped a good ol’ flatulence joke into the airwaves.

    Huckabee’s books include a 12-stop (yes, stop) program for weight loss and a 12-stop program for a better nation. If Huckabee could morph the two and run on a platform that promised “Vote for Me and You’ll Lose Weight,” he’d be unstoppable.

    But this man of the hour—or the minute—is selling himself as this year’s compassionate conservative. And even in the speed-dating world, there’s time for a second glance.

    Huckabee may “drink a different kind of Jesus juice,” as he says. But that hasn’t stopped him from selling himself on TV as a “Christian leader”—compared to, say, a Mormon leader. In Wednesday’s Des Moines Register debate, he said the most important thing was to bridge the great divides in the country. But that’s the same man who once said we have to “take this nation back for Christ.”

    His comments about educating illegal immigrants—“we’re a better country than to punish children for what their parents did”—brought him kudos. But he looked less kind and gentle accepting the endorsement of border vigilante Jim Gilchrist, founder of the Minuteman Project.

    As for social issues? Huckabee’s tone has evolved a bit, which is notable since he doesn’t believe in evolution. He frames himself as a politician whose pro-life stance doesn’t begin at conception and end at birth. But he’s long been an anti-abortion absolutist.

    Huckabee may now preach against intolerance toward gays. He told the Values Voter Summit: “I want us to be very careful that we don’t come across as having some animosity or hatred toward people.” But his own animosity dates back to a 1992 pitch against an “aberrant, unnatural, and sinful lifestyle” and in favor of quarantining AIDS patients.

    As a presidential candidate, Huckabee frames his opposition to gay marriage and civil unions as a stand for “traditional marriage.” But since we’re speed-dating, let’s remember just how traditional a marriage. The pastor politician signed on to the 1998 Southern Baptist Convention statement that “a wife is to submit herself graciously to the servant leadership of her husband.” Prenup anyone?

    All this may help him court the evangelical voters who make up 45 percent of Iowa’s Republican caucus voters, but are they ready to hitch up with the man who missed the intelligence report on Iran? The man who is a blank slate on foreign policy?

    And what of the culturally valued but ethically challenged governor behind the guitar who took endless gifts from his supporters, including 50-percent-off hamburgers at Wendy’s. The Huckabees even signed up for a gift registry when he left the governor’s house. Does he still make you laugh?

    Huckabee said that Americans are “willing to forgive people for their ideology if they have optimism and vision.” He could be right. That’s what sold the last compassionate conservative? Remember him?

    Next!   

    Ellen Goodman’s e-mail address is ellengoodman(at)globe.com.  

    © 2007, Washington Post Writers Group


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By May, December 14, 2007 at 10:32 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

A Gift Registry?  Seriously?  Satan himself could run for president in this country under the guise of a conservative christian and win the votes of the fundamentalists.  They don’t seem to care what’s under the surface of a person, just that he claims to be a good christian.  And it’s all in the claims, there does not have to be anything substantial to back it up.  This man is very scary.

On another tack, though, I wish someone would ask these homophobes what, exactly they mean by “traditional marriage”.  Do they mean traditional by today’s terminology?  Or, given Huck’s baptist leanings where women are subservient, do they really mean “traditional Puritan marriage”.  Would they really like to go back to a time when marriages were arranged for convenience and women had no rights of property ownership and voting, etc.  By tradition, marriage has not always been all that beneficial for both partners.  I don’t get why the institution of marriage is continuiously held up as some fine example of how society should organize personal relationships.  But, in reality, it’s all just rhetoric anyway I suppose.  We’re not going to get honesty out of politicians running for office.  I think even they tend to forget what they say from speech to speech, or what they believe from day to day.

Report this
Paul_GA's avatar

By Paul_GA, December 14, 2007 at 6:16 am Link to this comment

My mind’s made up; I’m voting for Ron Paul when the primary comes around in my neck of the woods, and if he’s not the Repub nominee, then I’m writing his name on my ballot come next November.

After all, as Eugene V. Debs once said, “It’s better to vote for what you want and not get it than vote for what you don’t want and get it.”

Report this
 
Right 1, Site wide - BlogAds Premium
 
Right 2, Site wide - Blogads
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion   Publisher, Zuade Kaufman   Editor, Robert Scheer
© 2014 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.

Like Truthdig on Facebook