![]() |
|
||
|
Romney’s Walk on a TightropePosted on Dec 6, 2007Peter Montgomery Originally posted on Right Wing Watch.
Kennedy was the Democratic nominee pledging to Americans his support for “absolute” separation of church and state, promising that his Catholicism would not dictate his policy positions, and urging Americans to rise above religious intolerance and promote an ideal of brotherhood. Romney is in a dramatically different situation. He’s in a heated primary race, losing conservative evangelical Christian voters to Mike Huckabee, and walking a tightrope. He can’t make JFK’s appeal to church-state separation, because he’s trying to get support from people who think church-state separation is, in Pat Robertson’s phrase, a “lie of the left.” Ditto for an appeal to religious tolerance, not a high priority for the “Christian nation” crowd. So Romney’s more likely to try to convince Religious Right voters that they should care less about the theology of Mormonism and more about his pledge to support Religious Right policy priorities down the line: criminalization of abortion, opposition to equality for gay people, a dismantling of the wall separating church and state—and judges who agree. That’s been enough to win the support of some high-profile Religious Right leaders, including Paul Weyrich, Lou Sheldon and Jay Sekulow. Advertisement Mike Huckabee, in many ways the dream candidate for Religious Right voters, isn’t trying to make things any easier for Romney. While deflecting opportunities to comment directly on whether or not Mormons are Christians, Huckabee has encouraged others to ask Romney. “If we’re going to ask me about my faith, let’s ask all the candidates about theirs,” he suggests. “Now as you noticed, I’m not hesitant or reluctant to talk about mine.” Of course, the whole conversation tells us how far the Religious Right and its GOP allies are from the vision espoused by John F. Kennedy. In October, a prominent Dallas minister, Robert Jeffress, speaking of Romney, said, “It’s a little hypocritical for the last eight years to be talking about how important it is for us to elect a Christian president and then turn around and endorse a non-Christian,” he said. “Christian conservatives are going to have to decide whether having a Christian president is really important or not.” The Religious Right’s long public war on church-state separation and religious pluralism has been cheered on by Republican officials as long as it has been a weapon against Democratic candidates. But it’s not as much fun for them when the target is one of the GOP’s top contenders. Check out Montgomery’s follow-up about Romney’s speech here. Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment
|
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved. |
By Walter Craig, December 8, 2007 at 1:50 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee for moral cleansing of the United States. The two candidates who aren’t aftraid to rule executively with a Holy Bible in one hand and an oil dollar in the other. Who cares about all the baloney of them flip-floping? Two negatives make a positive right? If one flips, the other flops, and they both stay in the same position.
Report thisBy BRR, December 8, 2007 at 3:08 am #
Unite all non-evangelicals to fight against the day this type of elected leader has a rally to burn the Constitution, the quaint outdated document it has become. The Bible and it’s ancillary Book of Mormon will suffice.
Report thisBy Thomas Billis, December 7, 2007 at 8:59 pm #
What the hell is happening to my country?I guess if you are not a Christy, America is not the place for you.How did the Christies go from marginal lunatics to people with a say in anything political.Billy Graham was a blip on the screen when he visited Pres.You knew for a small minority the Pres had to meet with him occasionly and in Nixon’s case swap anti semitic barbs.The conversation since Kennedy has changed from Kennedy giving a speech to declare that there will be no religious interference in government to it will be the “right” kind of religious interference in government.If Mormonism is a cult it is no more a cult than the rest of them.Religion has been a problem in politics and the Founders having seen what a problem it caused in Europe tried to steer us from that path and for 220 years that policy has worked by all accounts very well.Jefferson who was a diest which does not recognize Christ was not shunned from political life he was accepted and elected to federal office.To put things in perspective Thomas Jefferson vs George Bush in a presidential election George Bush wins in a landslide.So in the present climate if you are expecting greatness from our next President forget it greatness could not get elected.
Report thisBy BRR, December 7, 2007 at 1:57 am #
Romney showed those godless European by slamming their empty cathedrals, with few not kneeling in prayer, and implied leftist politics that only a steadfast Christian nation can save.
Please Lord, if you aren’t working to help Notre Dame’s football team, don’t allow this fakir to rule your chosen country.
Report this