LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.Best Political Blog Winner, 2007 Webby Awards, People's Voice and Jury.   Boots on the Ground by Dusk: My Tribute to Pat Tillman, By Mary Tillman with Narda Zacchino
 
July 6, 2008
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Reports
On Black Patriotism
Obama’s Leap of Faith
Happy Oil Dependence Day

Arts & Culture

Digs
Inside the Data Mine

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Truthdig Bazaar
The Virgin of Flames

The Virgin of Flames

By Chris Abani
$11.20

more items

 
Reports

Flying Coach on a Planetary Scale

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Dec 6, 2007

By David Sirota

A recent flight I took was, like most these days, completely packed. About 100 fellow travelers and I were crammed into a way-too-small coach cabin. But when I stood up for a moment, I discovered we were all making our situation worse.

Looking out over the rows, I saw that almost all aboard had pushed their seats back, invading the space of those behind them. This was bad for everyone. As any flier knows, the benefit of reclining is more than offset by the inconvenience of having a stranger in your lap. And yet, most passengers—including me—had contributed to the problem.

The seat recliner uses the public domain—in this case, space—and we have gotten used to using as much of that domain as we can, not just on planes but everywhere. This is our destructive me culture: Anything we want in the public sphere, we take or use, with little regard for the overall ramifications.

A stranger reclines into your lap. Someone in a theater talks through the movie. The guy at the next table yammers so loudly on his cell phone that you can’t hear your lunch companion. A passerby litters in the park. In each example, the public domain is trampled and usurped by the me culture.

But what happens when this culture affects the really big stuff—like, say, planetary survival? It is a critical question because, according to the new book “Apollo’s Fire,” that’s precisely what’s going on.

Written by Congressman Jay Inslee, D-Wash., and Center for American Progress fellow Bracken Hendricks, the book describes how our society’s carbon-reliant economy treats the atmosphere in the same counterproductive way as seat-reclining passengers treat the limited space in coach. As a result, while we may enjoy leaving lights on, driving a gas-guzzling SUV or, yes, flying, the carbon emissions we generate from such activities are pushing the planet toward a global warming disaster, rife with floods, droughts and general societal upheaval.

“We look at the air like it is infinite, rather than what it really is—a limited resource,” Hendricks told me after he made a speech in Denver.

The problem revolves around cost. Just as you are assessed no additional fee to lean your airplane chair back and set off a chain reaction of reclining and cabinwide discomfort, we are assessed no additional fee when we pump carbon dioxide into the air and help wreak planetwide destruction. And the results in our me culture are predictable. We recline and pollute away—overall consequences be damned.

“Apollo’s Fire” offers ways to address the crisis, the first being a cap on greenhouse gas emissions or a tax on carbon. We limit access to or charge fees for using water, land and other natural resources. Why shouldn’t polluters have to pay to use the air—the most precious natural resource of all? Equally important, the book explores both public and private investments that could change the way we generate energy in the first place.

Fortunately, the political will to protect the atmosphere is already building. For instance, some forward-thinking energy companies are cutting down their carbon dioxide output in anticipation of a price on carbon. Governors from coal-producing states are acknowledging that carbon emissions need to be cut. Even some major corporate shareholders are pushing their companies to cut back on carbon emissions. They see big profit potential in providing the world with clean energy.

These moves reflect polls that show the public realizes the health of our atmosphere has worth—and needs to be protected. Just as The New York Times recently wrote that many people “feel a brief, murderous urge to strike back” when the airplane chair in front of them reclines, we are beginning to feel similar emotions when a carbon-belching Hummer drives by. That is, we are beginning to feel violated when others harm the planet.

In short, our me culture is colliding with our recognition that the Earth is one big confined airplane, and that when it comes to the atmosphere, we are all in that last row—up against a wall, unable to kick back when we are encroached upon. Global warming is showing that our air, like cramped coach space, is actually finite. Let’s hope things don’t have to get too uncomfortable before we do something about it.

David Sirota is the bestselling author of “Hostile Takeover” (Crown, 2006). He is a senior fellow at the Campaign for America’s Future and a board member of the Progressive States Network—both nonpartisan research organizations. His daily blog can be found at www.credoaction.com/sirota.

© 2007 Creators Syndicate Inc.

Email Newsletter

Get truth delivered to your inbox every week.

Previous item: Romney's Walk on a Tightrope

Next item: Clinton's Obama Blunder

Jump to Comments

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By Ed, December 10, 2007 at 9:25 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Humans need to stop breeding so prolifically. Six billion is enough!

Report this

By cyrena, December 8, 2007 at 11:28 pm #

#118887 by Harvey Reid

• But until the cheapskate airlines give us the few more inches that a normal size human being requires for basic comfort, those of us with 6ft 3inches of height and with lame lower backs have no choice but to tilt the seat back to something close to a little more natural position.  It’s not at all about selfishness, it’s about simple survival, so please use another example!

It’s never gonna happen Harvey. Not because you don’t have a point, but that’s not even what the thing is about. The cheapskate airlines aren’t gonna do anything like what you’ve suggested, (although they may make the seats even smaller, and expect us to learn how to twist ourselves into pretzels) as long as people keep doing exactly that.

I mean, the author DOES mention that the airplane was packed. So, as long as the public keeps putting up with it, (as we do with everything else) they’ll just keep extracting more blood. In truth, they aren’t really ‘cheapskates’ at all, when we consider that the airline/corporate profits have SORED, higher than any flight plan I ever created. So, the few that were INTENDED to become filthy wealthy at the expense of all the rest of us…HAVE. I think that’s really the point.

The only way they’re ever likely to do any sort of changing up, would be for everyone to simply STOP paying for their services. As in, STOP FLYING. Now of course, we know that isn’t likely to happen. So, that’s pretty much what I think the greater point is. On THAT at least, we ARE selfish.

As long as folks keep flying, and keep commuting 100 plus miles a day in their hummers, and keep cruising the world, and all the rest of it, the corporate robber barons will continue to rake in the money, and then escape with the loot, once they’ve got it all. The rest of us don’t matter, and we won’t.

Report this

By Harvey Reid, December 8, 2007 at 7:11 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Clean, green, the commonweal… that’s all good stuff, no question from here.

But until the cheapskate airlines give us the few more inches that a normal size human being requires for basic comfort, those of us with 6ft 3inches of height and with lame lower backs have no choice but to tilt the seat back to something close to a little more natural position.  It’s not at all about selfishness, it’s about simple survival, so please use another example!

Report this

By cyrena, December 7, 2007 at 5:05 pm #

The article is excellant, as are these comments. I appreciate all of the links, (and the lyrics).

Bert, you’re so right. Where there is a will, there will always be a way. I think the issue here in the ‘me culture’ is that it has depended on whose will has the most sway/power.

How much easy profit is there in doing things the me way? How long ago could we have utilized the oceans, and the winds and the sun, to produce the energy that we need? Some of this is relatively new technology and thinking, as some of us grow smarter.

On the other hand, the use of some of these technologies has been around for decades, (at least solar power) and it’s simply not been profitable enough for the me culturists.

So, if we’re dead flat serious about going green, that dead flat seriousness must be joined at the hip with the philosophy of producing for the common good. And, the me culture has never considered the common good.

So yep, where there’s a will, there’s a way. Always. But, if it’s not a will for the common good, then we wind up with what we have now, which is hurtling all of us to our graves. (if there’s enough dirt left to bury us) (no pun intended).

Report this

By P. T., December 7, 2007 at 9:53 am #

The problem is one of what economist’s call externalities.  The costs of polluting are imposed externally on everybody, but the benefits are enjoyed solely by the polluter (it’s worth it to the polluter to pollute).  The commons wind up being polluted.

Garrett Harden wrote a famous essay on the problem, called “The Tragedy of the Commons.” For the essay, click http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/162/3859/1243

Report this

By jackpine savage, December 7, 2007 at 4:45 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

You are not seriously suggesting that i/we sacrifice for the common good, are you?  How decidedly un-American.  Jimmy Carter tried that; Ronald Reagen retorted, “Don’t worry, be happy.” Look who won that election.  Bill Clinton was Ronald Reagen dressed in populist blue.  And who can forget the sage advice from the oval office, that we are now at war and we will be at war for generations to come, but the important thing is to go shopping and buy houses you cannot afford.

As i read the article, i couldn’t help thinking of Funkadelic’s album, “America Eats its Young”.  To wit:

You say you don’t like what your country’s about (yeah)
Ain’t you deep
In your semi-first class seat
You picket this and protest that
And eat yourself fat
Ain’t you deep
In your semi-first class seat

If you don’t like the effect
Don’t produce the cause

Report this

By Bert, December 7, 2007 at 1:54 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

If you’re dead-flat serious about the whole issue
of clean, green energy, then you need to think about
tidal energy and hydrogen. The ocean cycles up and
down, up and down, up and...you get the idea.
Hydrogen can be gained through electrolysis of water,
which can be powered by electromechanical power
generation supported by the tidal thing. Where there’s a will, there’s a way, where there’s a whiny
sad excuse, there’s usually a government doughnut
in play…

Report this

By GW=MCHammered, December 6, 2007 at 11:20 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

We are our own vampires of democracy.

http://www.weshow.com/us/p/10289/planets_and_stars_siz e_scale

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox

Privacy Policy

 
Click here to advertise with Truthdig
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2008 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.