|
|||
|
Conservative, or Just Plain Corrupt?Posted on Nov 30, 2007By David Sirota Through their ethics scandals, Republicans in Washington long ago began making the word conservative synonymous with the term corrupt. Surprisingly, though, it is a group of Democrats that is cementing this definitional conversion for good. In the midst of the housing crisis, a cadre of self-described “conservative” Democrats called the Blue Dog Coalition is demanding that congressional leaders delay legislation designed to help people trapped in high-interest loans stay in their homes and avoid foreclosure. The bill, House Resolution 3609, allows judges to ameliorate the terms of abusive “subprime” mortgages. Rep. Brad Miller, D-N.C., is championing it—a gutsy move for a lawmaker whose state domiciles major lenders. The Blue Dogs say they oppose Miller’s initiative out of concern for the integrity of the 2005 bankruptcy bill—a telling justification. Under that odious law, millionaires can shield their mansions from creditors, and corporate executives (think: Enron guys) can prevent ripped-off shareholders and employees from seizing their holdings. Harvard’s Elizabeth Warren notes that the law also “permits people with vacation homes and investment property to rework their mortgages in bankruptcy.” But regular homeowners? Sorry—without Miller’s legislation, judges are barred from defending you against the vultures. Blue Dog Democrats cite the social conservatism of their rural and exurban districts as the reason for such high-profile stands against their party. Somehow, we are expected to believe that their constituents’ anti-abortion or pro-gun views mean those same constituents want Congress to help banks throw people out of their homes. But since when did any voters—conservative or otherwise—support that kind of thing? Advertisement As National Journal reports, corporate lobbyists “knew exactly who to go to in order to stop the [foreclosure relief] bill in its tracks: the Blue Dog Coalition.” These lawmakers are the mercenaries’ go-to crew not because of any principled ideology, but because they have been big recipients of campaign cash from the finance and real estate industries. Of course, this is only the most recent example of pay-to-play shenanigans on banking issues. In 2005, 20 “New” Democrats—another group billed as conservative—signed a letter demanding the passage of the original bankruptcy bill. Those Democrats had pocketed a combined $750,000 from the financial industry. That same year, the Senate cast a “conservative” vote defeating a bill limiting credit card interest rates to a whopping 30 percent—a modest measure to say the least. Eighteen Republican and Democratic lawmakers voting against the measure had previously voted for a tougher interest cap. What changed? They received about $2 million from the credit card and banking industries in the interim. Still, this new Blue Dog letter takes the cake for sheer brazenness. Why? Because the current mortgage crisis is especially hitting the kinds of exurban and rural districts these “conservative” Democrats purport to speak for. The Atlantic Monthly’s Matthew Yglesias recently reviewed foreclosure data and found that “the hardest-hit areas are the high-growth fringes of vibrant metro areas”—the exurbs that Blue Dog signatories like Illinois Democratic Rep. Melissa Bean represent. Real Estate magazine reports, “In 500 rural counties, one-third or more of mortgage originations involved high-interest loans.” That could spell trouble for districts like the one represented by Rep. Jim Marshall, D-Ga.—another signer. His state has almost 30,000 homes financed by subprime loans. So, will these faux conservatives win? Maybe in this battle over mortgage reform, and in some other upcoming skirmishes, like the brouhaha over taxes. The National Journal reports that this same group of Democrats is intent on “limiting the scope” of proposals to close the loophole letting billionaire hedge fund managers pay a lower tax rate than the janitors who clean their offices. Apparently, the Blue Dogs would have us believe conservative, working-class constituents are insisting their congressional representatives not only support bank foreclosures but also help Wall Street barons rob the federal treasury. Nonetheless, over the long term, those like the Blue Dogs will have an increasingly difficult time succeeding—both legislatively and electorally. The more they attach their “conservative” label to such obscene corruption, the more that label will be indelibly tarnished. Aiding loan sharks and tax cheats may elicit campaign donations and smiles in Washington, but it is no way to win hearts and minds in the rest of America. David Sirota is the bestselling author of “Hostile Takeover” (Crown, 2006). He is a senior fellow at the Campaign for America’s Future and a board member of the Progressive States Network, both nonpartisan research organizations. His daily blog can be found at www.credoaction.com/sirota. © 2007 Creators Syndicate Inc. CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment |
By Property for sale Phuket, May 31, 2011 at 7:53 pm Link to this comment
I read this and close my eyes thinking of the many men and women, armed with enthusiasm, intellect and hope in bringing some meaningful changes to our world politics. They end up being sucked in and taken over by the seduction of the very thing they were attempting to balance for those who have affluence and for those who do not. Until there is a shift in our societies values then we will continue to live and die by the sword of fear, hatred and abuse of power.
Report thisBy Sam House, January 12, 2011 at 10:48 pm Link to this comment
Is it any shock that the so-called ‘champions of the common man’ are really only concerned with protecting the interests of the big banks, millionaires and corporations who fund their campaigns?It is astounding how many times the same blatant lies and excuses can be exposed for the criminal acts that they are and yet we continue to move forward with a system of political funding that is rotten to the core.
Report thisBy Rob, February 6, 2009 at 5:42 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I find these obstructionist republicans
are keeping it up especially Sen. Lindsey Grahm.
sucks..
R-south carolina sucks and let them keep being obstructionsist and the senate in 2010 will go to 70
Report thisdemocrats
henry
By ocjim, December 3, 2007 at 10:18 pm Link to this comment
Corruption can come from either side, usually due to abuse of power: the old saying that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. The neoconservative strangehold on the 3 branches of government certainly approached the absolute and their ruthless exercise of that power became pure corruption.
For democracy to survive, the voting public cannot react with the angry knee-jerk vote of 2006. It must be an informed vote that considers the good of all. Economic decisions should be informed as well. Victims of the subprime fiasco perhaps are also victims of a dumbed-down public which our culture helped to promote as well, aided by a mediocre presidents attitude.
Report thisBy Marjorie L. Swanson, December 3, 2007 at 4:47 am Link to this comment
A Blue Dog Democrat is a Republican who is ashamed or afraid to admit he’s a Republican. Afraid because the Republican Brand is so coated with corruption that even a dimwitted public is catching on. Of course there are corrupt Democrats too. What adult would claim otherwise? It’s just that to call a Blue Dog Democrat a Democrat is inaccurate.
Report thisBy Conservative Yankee, December 2, 2007 at 1:02 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
The choice between the DEMOlition party and the REPUBLICscrapped orgy is far finer then described here. It is like the 18-year-old, in jail for the first time…“Hey Yo Youse a Nazi, a Nigger, or a Spick?” No matter what he chooses somebody’s gonna fuck him.
I’ve spoken about Lawrence, and Worcester Massachusetts before. Both these cities in the liberal backyard of Ted John and Deval. The slums. waste and lack of concern date to before the 1970’s.
BUT
These cities are no worse off than where the R’s control things. Chrome Avenue in Miami Gary Indiana,and in the Oklahoma City Housing authority which will shortly be under control of a “master” as it slips into receivership.
No, working folks get the shit end of the stick no matter which party is “running things”
The only practical solution is to give one the congress, and the other the white house…. then at least they will have to buy rubbers!
Report thisBy cann4ing, December 2, 2007 at 9:12 am Link to this comment
The philosophy of 21st Century Republicans does not even remotely resemble that held by the first Republican president.
“Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is superior to capital, and deserves much higher consideration.”—President Abraham Lincoln, 1861.
Where Lincoln advanced the notion of government of the people, by the people and for the people, 21st Century Republicans see government as simply a tool for maintaining and expanding the level of inequality. They value the greed of the privileged few over the needs of the many. It is the “freedom” of capital to exploit labor sans the impediments of unions, workers’ rights, environmental protections & health/safety regulations—the true measure of “freedom” under what George H. W. Bush coined as “The New World Order.”
The only difference between 21st Century Republicans and 21st Century corporate Democrats is that Republicans do not hide their disdain for the common man whereas the corporate sector of the Democratic Party pretends to be looking out for the interests of ordinary people even as corporate lobbyists, time and again, persuade them to betray their Democratic base, while that Democratic base, in election-after-election, deceived by a thoroughly corrupt corporate media, continues to support these corporatist charletons.
Taken in by a poll-driven mentality, ordinary citizens seldom see or hear, let alone digest the substance offered by true progressives like Dennis Kucinich.
Report thisBy cyrena, December 2, 2007 at 3:54 am Link to this comment
#117360 by Yani
Cyrena cant accept the failures of her own party that she has to try and blame the republicans? Get real. They are your party, they are Democrats, they are just as corrupt and they are failures.
Another attempt by cyrena to define is . A Democrat is a Democrat is a Democrat. Blame your own party for their own miserable failures.
Actually Yani,
You got this wrong too. I was actually forced to be an Independent, back when I had to do all of that hard time living in the most republican state of the Union. (wouldnt bother me if Texas just seceded, and then Ron Paul could just be the President of Texas, and the rest of us wouldnt have to worry about funding it with our tax dollars). Now of course we would allow any normal people to escape to the State of their choice, so they wouldnt get stuck with the weirdos, and wed welcome them all. But, there arent that many, so I dont see a problem there.
But yep, youre right that Im a dem again, now that I can be. And, I only call a spade a spade. The repugs HAVE destroyed our country under Dick Bush and the neoconners, and unfortunately, that INCLUDES some democrats, who are democrats in name only. So, youve missed the mark again, just because its obviously important for you to attack me personally. Make no mistake about it though, Im more than aware of the Blue Dog dems that have consistently assisted the repugs in perpetrating the rapid decline.
As for the other part of your accusation, I had no idea what you were talking about, until Douglas Chalmers realized that you were responding to the WRONG poster. I havent attempted to define anything that hasnt already defined itself.
It is what it IS yani. Some folks just see better than others, so they can figure this stuff out. Maybe you need new glasses for your brain.
Report thisBy republicanSScareme, December 2, 2007 at 2:31 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
The Republican Party has always been a criminal organization to those who run it. How it is merged with the Nazi Party.
Report thisBy Outraged, December 2, 2007 at 1:04 am Link to this comment
Re: #117360 by Yani on 12/01
So…are you voting for Ron Paul…the Republican’s Republican? Or did you just change your screen name?
Report thisBy thomas billis, December 1, 2007 at 11:52 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
To answer one commenter sure there are corrupt democrats.The difference is that a Democrat if he is corrupt will try to steal one dollar in five.The republican wants the whole five dollars.A Democrat will steal setting up social programs that benefit everybody. The republican will make war and hire Blackwater.Which corrupt official is less scary?
Report thisBy BushWacked, December 1, 2007 at 3:09 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Our jails are full of the WRONG people, the poor & defenseless. The REAL criminals get elected.
Report thisBy Yani, December 1, 2007 at 9:38 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Cyrena cant accept the failures of her own party that she has to try and blame the republicans? Get real. They are your party, they are Democrats, they are just as corrupt and they are failures.
Another attempt by cyrena to define is . A Democrat is a Democrat is a Democrat. Blame your own party for their own miserable failures.
Report thisBy DennisD, November 30, 2007 at 7:19 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Dave - neither party discriminates when it comes to being corrupt. The Repugs just keep raising the bar for the Dems to aspire to, and they will.
Report thisBy thomas billis, November 30, 2007 at 12:44 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
When John Edwards talks abiut public financing for federal campaigns everybody looks at him like he is nuts.Public financing of campaigns will save the taxpayers much more than the cost of the campaigns.It will be an attempt to end the cozy money relationship between politicians and rich lobbyists.
Report thisBy Conservative Yankee, November 30, 2007 at 11:39 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
117086 by Robert Giacobbe on 11/30 at 10:24 am
@ #117048 by Conservative Yankee:
“I think you need to change your screen name. You can keep the yankee part.”
I’ll take that under advisement, and have my lawyers get back to you.
Report thisBy Nancy, November 30, 2007 at 11:34 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Why doesn’t every home-owner register themselves as a ‘corporation’, then they don’t HAVE to be responsible.
Report thisBy Barbara Ann Jackson -Law & Grace, Inc, November 30, 2007 at 10:49 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Most critical to the Nationwide FORECLOSURE Crisis is the FORECLOSURE FRAUD component. In almost all instances of foreclosure fraud, MORTGAGE LENDERS become enabled to ILLEGALLY FLIP properties.
In Louisiana, it is HIGHLY COMMON for COLLECTOR attorneys to file foreclosures: (i) in the name of a DEFUNCT mortgage company;(ii)in the name of a mortgage company which is NO LONGER holder of the security interest (the promissory note); or (iii) file a foreclosure and AFFIX a ‘ransom’ amount (the collector’s fee) far exceeding what the promissory note “Acceleration Clause” authorizes.
Despite a property owner’s entitlement to CHALLENGE CONTRARY-TO-LAW loss of his / her home, most property owners LACK consumer and legal knowledge; the Court System is REFRACTORY; and there is a SHORTAGE of attorneys with acumen to pursue this area of Consumer Law!
Also, when borrowers sue for “Unfair Debt Collection Practices,” etc., the collector gets to make more $$ through prolonged litigation, and reaps added billable hourly fees. As such, it is NOT
HARD to conceive that $$ which should have been paid to Wall Street INVESTORS went to collectors and to association-in-fact” members of real estate fraud who got a slice of the foreclosure pie.
Judicial Corruption is the underlying factor of New Orleans Apartheid conditions that became exposed due to Hurricane Katrina floods. The court systems as well as the Louisiana division of the U.S. Justice
Department FACILITATES real estate and mortgage FRAUD here!!
EXAMPLE: In my absence, a debt collector attorney conducted a simulated auction of my residence on May 19, 2005 by use of non-existent mortgagor GE Capital Mortgage Services’ identity. Although GE Capital Mortgage Services ceased to exist on October 25, 2002, documents were created to portray the successful auction bidder as defunct GE Capital, and the property deed was transferred out of my
name and registered in the name of GE Capital. Months, later, 3 days before Katrina hit New Orleans, my family and I was evicted by a
different attorney on behalf of mortgage giant FREDDIE MAC. According to false documents, Freddie is recorded as having purchased my residence from GE Capital in July 2005. To the contrary, GE Capital Mortgage Services became DEFUNCT on October 25, 2002, due to a merger. Thus, it is impossible for Freddie Mac to have lawfully bought my house.
Default on my part, stemming from an abusive marriage, is a fact -and I was trying to negotiate, but the UNREASONABLE RANSOM and other extortion tactics by the debt collector hindered me. (Ransom-type repossessions / foreclosures in New Orleans have caused several pre-Katrina DEBT COLLECTION lawsuits by various homeowners.) As mentioned, illegalities pertaining to real estate fraud, as well as judicial corruption is common in Louisiana—and SEVERE REPRISALS become INFLICTED on people who do not cooperate with property
extortion. Everything I have written here is verifiable in court records and transcripts; and overwhelming evidence is posted on my website.
Lastly, Investors need to become more astute about how mortgage servicers’ misdeeds hurts borrowers as well as siphons incalculable amounts of money from what Investors should reap. (See “Limiting Abuse
and Opportunism By Mortgage Servicers,” AND “Private Property Rights Deferred: Has Predatory Mortgage Servicing Destroyed The American
Dream” by Rawle Andrews, Jr., Esq.,and Leroy Jones, Jr., J.D. Visit:
http://www.msfraud.org/index.html.)
**Here’s a few site links which clarify and prove what I’ve written:
“ILLEGAL REAL ESTATE FLIPPING…”
http://www.lawgrace.org/2007/06/21/illegal-real-estate-flipping-unfair-enrichment-etc/
Report this“Anatomy of Judicial Corruption,. . .”
http://www.lawgrace.org/2007/09/04/motion-for-reinstatement-of-07-30426-appeal-case-explanation-of-request-for-extension-of-time-to-file-brief-and-for-reconsideration-of-5th-circuit-orders-dated-august-31-2007/
By cognitorex, November 30, 2007 at 9:27 am Link to this comment
Establish a Federal ‘Credit’ Insurance Corp.
. 2006 Wall Street bonuses; $25 Billion. 2007 Sub prime losses: $25 billion.
As the big boys on Wall Street direct trillions in capital flows to derivatives, rank speculation and the latest hot packaged products like sub-prime mortgages they whet their beaks, like the mob, at every turn.
Why not place a one one hundreth of a per cent tax on these flows to fund the financial and social dislocation costs caused by the the financial industry’s recurring greed driven excesses?
It would be a manifest boon to American workers who toil at multiple jobs to create this capital and certainly smooth out a glaring economic pratfall.
The banks and major financial institutions go on binges as a matter of their nature. REITS, Latin American lending, S&Ls;, hi-tech bubble and now sub prime loans have each wiped out an enormous amount of the financial industrys equity capital. To rebuild equity, subsequent financial instruments such as car loans, mortgages and credit cards must carry higher profit margins. Thus Jane and John Doe have to pay a penalty to rebuild this equity base.
We know these binges occur and have a deposit insurance mechanism in place (the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp -FDIC) which forces the bankers to set aside emergency money so that the deposit base of banks and their customers will not evaporate.
Likewise we need a Federal Credit Insurance Corp so that when these binges wipe out financial equity there is a source of credit (i.e.loans) available.
Banks do two things. They hold deposits and they offer loans. We insure that these bingers will not take Americans deposits with them as they go bust from time to time. Why not extract a minuscule fee from each credit offering in order that the availability of credit will not be so totally hemorrhaged as to affect gross interest rates, the dollars standing, prices and inflation?
ps. I mentioned this idea to a bright staunch corporate conservative friend who said that the idea is 100% valid and worthy; but without a guaranteed mechanism that the dreaded Dems could not keep increasing the tax, for him it was dead on arrival.
—cognitorex blogspot—
Report thisBy Conservative Yankee, November 30, 2007 at 8:39 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
117022 by Robert Giacobbe on 11/30 at 7:32 am
“The bill, House Resolution 3609, allows judges to ameliorate the terms of abusive subprime mortgages.
“Not abusive at all, but a direct result of the idiot, greedy buyers who agreed to terms they could never possibly deliver to, and the idiot, greedy lenders who agreed to unacceptable levels of default risk.”
You remind me ao a former Judge here in Maine who asked the abused wife in his court;
“...and what did you do to deserve this?”
As my screen-name suggests, I favor “personal responsibility” BUT I also (doing much dealing in real estate)have heard RE brokers, and lenders tell prespective clients “Don’t worry, in five years the price of your house will increase, and you will be making more money, so any “small increase” won’t hurt you.
It has been 50 years since we have had inflation coupled with declining property values. People were born, and grew to adulthood never believing such a thing could occur, and anyway, the bankers must know what they are doing?
As a “conservative” I opposed the deregulation of the banking industry. Unregulated commercial lenders (Like Ditech, and Countrywide)are poor substitutes for the old regulated savings bank which did the lion’s share of home mortgages before Nixon. Local lenders are aware of economic factors which effect their sphere. National lenders don’t do “local histories”
As to your comment on “Mcmansions” the properties I see being foreclosed are 2 bedroom one bath prefabricated housing usually on less than an acre.
I would not be opposed to a bail out (similar to the one offered Chrysler) of first time homebuyers in foreclosure IF part of the legislation returned the first time under $300,000 home mortgages to regulated status. We’ll never get our local bganks back, but maybe we can make the larger institutions pay some attention to local markets.
I notice (on the foreclosure map) that Westchester County New York, Bergan County New Jersey, and Fairfield County Connecticut have the lowest levels of foreclosure in the Nation….. Where do Citibank’s CEO and board members live?
Report thisBy clarence swinney, November 30, 2007 at 7:44 am Link to this comment
Attack with Nukes
SWINNEY LIST FOR ATTACKS
Feel free to distribute
Google search
Clarence swinney +
Democrats create wealth(do not brag)
84 democratic accomplishments(quietdo not awaken Democrats)
praise Clinton (Gore gored Gore by not using this)
salute Clinton
113 good things on Clinton
good comments on Clinton by world leaders
Clinton 30 character
Hillary
Reagan scandals (eulogize this Noonan)
How to identify a republican
Reagan firsts (Mt Rushmore)
Carter versus Reagan
Bush lies
Bush waffles( read these facts and say he is sane)
Moogumboo
Bush econovomits (only man to brag on failures)
Zoom economy
Swoosh (want armageddon here you have it)
Tax & spend liberal (how dumb can D be?)
King Richard
Clinton record on terrorism awesome
Swinney fact check
Hootenanny
North Carolina Hootenannys to commence in 2008.
Party-Celebration-foot stomping-yellinga Big Time
Good things about Democrats and bad things about Republicans
EasyFacts/History support Democrats.
ALL-AMERICAN PARTY vs 20% PARTY
Enjoy. Feel free to publish.
Clarence swinney
President-lifeaholics of America
Burlington nc
.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
new bookLIFEAHOLICSto be published 1-15-08
Report thisBook signing and presentation in North Carolina only.
By clarence swinney, November 30, 2007 at 7:39 am Link to this comment
Too long to post here
Report thisgoogle
clarence swinney
+ identify a republican
By teamlessmasses, November 30, 2007 at 7:30 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Well, if the people in out state regions fail, they can always come to the urban community. They’re too proud to take hand-outs, of course… Unlike the stereotype of us urban folks, who live off them, supposedly.
Just like going to California in the days of the Dust bowl. Come to the lands of milk and honey, where “socialist liberals” get paid for nothing, country boys. Let us help you raise your chilrens to fight the drug wars… You’re either for us or against us… Either way, you’ll probably spend some time in jail. Kinda’ like the boot camp. Three squares and cot, as they say.
That way the Blue Dogs won’t have to worry about their votes, and the electoral college can explain their opinions away as the unwashed masses, minorities, or just crazy liberal socialists, who aren’t “real Americans” as defined by Ronald Reagan’s handbook of official television stereotypes covered by the Constitution.
Report thisBy Conservative Yankee, November 30, 2007 at 6:34 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
“conservative”
DANIAL WEBSTER
“Cautious; having a risk-averse investment strategy which has preservation of capital as a high priority.”
SAMUEL FRANCIS
“The survival and enhancement of a particular people and its institutionalized cultural expressions.
ROGER SCRUTON
Maintenance of the social ecology the politics of delay” Mr Scruton meaning conservative purpose is to maintain, relatively unaltered, the vitality and health of a society.
Conservatives believe that sweeping transformation and untested ideas should not be employed before being fully assessed.
Up here in New England, a “Yankee conservative” would stay out of his neighbor’s affairs unless invited to help. They generally believe in small weak Federal Government relying more on State Government. They pinch a nickel until the buffalo shits on Jefferson, and if true to their position, refuse any governmental assistance, knowing that anything you get from government comes with “strings” designed to keep one “dependent”
The mis-use of the word “conservative” can be traced to the misuse of the word “liberal” No true Yankee Conservative would be involved in telling a woman how to handle a pregnancy unless they were asked by the woman in question, AND that woman had some close attachment to the person she was asking. Otherwise the classic Maine/New Hampshire response would be “That’s surely not my business….”
My belief is that the liberal/conservative thing arose when the two political parties became embarrassed about what they had become. Campaign signs rarely have a party affiliation on them any more. BUT they often (at least hereabouts) have the “conservative” or “liberal” designation (less often “liberal” these days)
The Bush administration AND the Dixicrats are FAR from any real definition of conservative. Someone should point out this perfidy.
Report thisBy Conservative Yankee, November 30, 2007 at 6:30 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
“conservative”
DANIAL WEBSTER
“Cautious; having a risk-averse investment strategy which has preservation of capital as a high priority.”
SAMUEL FRANCIS
“The survival and enhancement of a particular people and its institutionalized cultural expressions.
ROGER SCRUTON
Maintenance of the social ecology the politics of delay” Mr Scruton meaning conservative purpose is to maintain, relatively unaltered, the vitality and health of a society.
Conservatives believe that sweeping transformation and untested ideas should not be employed before being fully assessed.
Up here in New England, a “Yankee conservative” would stay out of his neighbor’s affairs unless invited to help. They generally believe in small weak Federal Government relying more on State Government. They pinch a nickel until the buffalo shits on Jefferson, and if true to their position, refuse any governmental assistance, knowing that anything you get from government comes with “strings” designed to keep one “dependent”
The mis-use of the word “conservative” can be traced to the misuse of the word “liberal” No true Yankee Conservative would be involved in telling a woman how to handle a pregnancy unless they were asked by the woman in question, AND that woman had some close attachment to the person she was asking. Otherwise the classic Maine/New Hampshire response would be “That’s surely not my business….”
My belief is that the liberal/conservative thing arose when the two political parties became embarrassed about what they had become. Campaign signs rarely have a party affiliation on them any more. BUT they often (at least hereabouts) have the “conservative” or “liberal” designation (less often “liberal” these days)
The Bush administration is FAR from any real definition of conservative. Someone should point out this perfidy.
Report thisBy KISS, November 30, 2007 at 5:54 am Link to this comment
Blue Dog Dimmos were more aptly named Dixie-Crats by good ol’ Harry. No difference they all are lap-dogs to corporations. Hence when living in a Fascist nation this is an ill we must live with. Low Dobbs advice to go independent is one way around this hoax-government, another is vote out every incumbent. Yup, vote out the good as well as the bad. Eventually we may have more than a two party system that has but one owner.
Report thisBy cyrena, November 30, 2007 at 12:27 am Link to this comment
Excellent piece from Mr. Sirota. I appreciate the info.
Might I also add that these Blue Dog democrats are the reason why it is also a FALSE presumption to say that our Congress is now controlled by Democrats?
THIS is why the alleged “Democrat-Controlled” Congress hasn’t been able to get anything done. The Blue Dog dems don’t vote as Dems on anything. They vote with the corrupt repuglicans.
Report this