![]() |
|
| |
|
Who Said Politics Was Fair?Posted on Nov 13, 2007By E.J. Dionne WASHINGTON—Democrats in Congress are discovering what it’s like to live in the worst of all possible worlds. They are condemned for selling out to President Bush, and for failing to make compromises aimed at getting things done. Democrats complain that this is unfair and, in some sense, it is. But who said that politics was fair? Over the short run, Democratic congressional leaders can count on little support from their party’s presidential candidates, particularly Barack Obama and John Edwards. Both have decided their best way of going after front-runner Hillary Clinton—who has been in Washington since her husband’s election as president in 1992—is to criticize politics-as-usual. At this weekend’s Democratic fundraising dinner in Des Moines, Obama and Edwards not only attacked Bush fiercely but issued broadsides against the larger status quo. When Obama assailed “the same old Washington textbook campaigns” and declared that he was “sick and tired of Democrats thinking that the only way to look tough on national security is by talking and acting and voting like George Bush Republicans,” he was aiming at Clinton. But Obama was echoing what many in his party have been saying about their congressional leadership. And when Edwards said that “Washington is awash with corporate money, with lobbyists who pass it out, with politicians who ask for it,” he was criticizing a system in which his own party is implicated. It makes sense for Democratic presidential candidates to distance themselves from the party’s Washington wing. A poll released last week by the Pew Research Center found that 54 percent of Americans disapprove of the performance of Democratic congressional leaders, an increase in dissatisfaction of 18 points since February. Among Democrats, disapproval of their own leaders rose from 16 percent in February to 35 percent now; in the same period, disapproval among independents rose from 41 percent to 56 percent. Democrats in Congress say their actual achievements of a minimum-wage increase, lobbying reform, improvements in the student loan program, and last week’s override of Bush’s veto of a $23-billion water projects bill are being overlooked—and that Bush and his congressional allies have systematically blocked even bipartisan efforts to produce further results. For example: The increases in financing for the State Children’s Health Insurance Program passed after Democrats made a slew of concessions to Republicans to win broad GOP support. But in the House, Democrats were short of the votes needed to override the president’s veto, so the proposal languishes. Rep. David Obey, D-Wis., chairman of the Appropriations Committee, notes that he has bargained productively with Republicans and that his budget bills have secured dozens of their votes. But the president seems intent on a budget confrontation. In a letter to Bush on Saturday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid tried to underscore the president’s role in the stalemate by calling for a “dialogue” to settle budget differences which “have never been so great that we cannot reach agreement on a spending plan that meets the needs of the American people.” They went on: “Key to this dialogue, however, is some willingness on your part to actually find common ground. Thus far, we have seen only a hard line drawn and a demand that we send only legislation that reflects your cuts to critical priorities of the American people.” Pelosi and Reid have a point, and they want Bush to get the blame for a budget impasse. But Bush seems to have decided that if he can’t raise his own dismal approval ratings, he will drag the Democrats down with him. So far, that is what’s happening. Yet the budget is just one of the Democrats’ problems. Their own partisans are furious that they have been unable to force a change in Bush’s Iraq policy. In the Pew survey, 47 percent said the Democrats had not gone “far enough” in challenging Bush on Iraq. Many in the rank and file are also angry that the Democratic-led Senate let through the nomination of Michael Mukasey as attorney general, even though he declined to classify waterboarding as a form of torture. Congressional Democrats are caught between two contradictory desires. One part of the electorate wants them to be practical dealmakers, another wants them to live up to the standard Obama set in the peroration of his Iowa speech when he praised those who “stood up ... when it was risky, stood up when it was hard, stood up when it wasn’t popular.” Is there a handbook somewhere on how to be a courageous dealmaker? Pelosi and Reid would love to read it. E.J. Dionne’s e-mail address is postchat(at)aol.com. © 2007, Washington Post Writers Group Previous item: It's Still the Economy, Stupid Next item: Paying More and Dying Sooner Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment
|
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved. |
By Conservative Yankee, November 20, 2007 at 5:14 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
114628 by Nancy on 11/19 at 10:56 pm
“So. Do you all think we should overhrow the moneychangers table? Everyone in favor say: AYE!”
Depends on who is running this particular table, and to whom the profit is going!
Report thisBy Nancy, November 19, 2007 at 10:56 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
So. Do you all think we should overhrow the moneychanger’s table? Everyone in favor say: AYE!
Report thisBy Conservative Yankee, November 16, 2007 at 5:07 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
“Conservative Yankee my Cheney, Im going to take a wild assed guess that what youre trying to say that there have been exceptions in the past and so there should be exceptions now or that there could be exceptions now or something like that. But there arent. Certainly not Nancy Pelosi or Diane Feinstein. So I dont get it.”
MY Senators are what I want in a Senator. We do not agree on every subject at all times, BUT they are MY Senators, and I don’t want some Liberal Geek in San Fran, or Some right-wing Xtian Nut in Mobile telling me (as in term limits) for whom I can or can not vote.
Although the overall-countrywide perception of “congress” is about 10% approval, individual districts rate THEIR employees much higher. For an instance Olympia Snowe (here in Maine) consistently draws a 65% approval rating. Susan Collins rates only slightly lower, and in THIS election, she is beating her (very popular) Democratic opponent by 7 to 10 percentage points in most polls.
Barney Frank (on the other side) is a principled congressman, and in his district he is quite popular. He won with over 70% of the vote last election, and he ignored his opponent. I can’t stand Hill-the-business-shill, BUT I would never tell New Yorkers they couldn’t vote for her.
“Term limits” are a sore loser tool. they subvert, rather than strengthen the system. They may not even be constitutional, when some future court looks at them.
Republicans liked term limits when Roosevelt took four presidential elections in a row, and again when the congress stayed in Democratic control for over 40 years. Now thew Democrats like the idea. In my view when both the D’s and the R’s agree, it means trouble for citizens.
Think about it this way. had it not been for term limits, Clinton would have beaten Bush in 2000, and all the complaints about government would be about “the four term Clinton Administration…. AND he wouldn’t have to run his bitch to return to the WH!
Report thisBy Douglas Chalmers, November 15, 2007 at 10:17 am #
113664 by Nancy on 11/14 at 10:17 pm: “Sovereignty = Loyalty…”
The art of war = never give a sucker an even break!
Report thisBy Mudwollow, November 15, 2007 at 10:01 am #
Conservative Yankee my Cheney, I’m going to take a wild assed guess that what you’re trying to say is that there have been exceptions in the past and so there should be exceptions now or that there could be exceptions now or something like that. But there aren’t. Certainly not Nancy Pelosi or Diane Feinstein. So I don’t get it.
When one looks at the list of lifetime politicians we have now through gerrymandering and corporate funding it’s pretty clear that your vote doesn’t do diddly squat to limit anyone’s lifetime political career.
Report thisBy Louise, November 15, 2007 at 4:48 am #
#113518 by Douglas Chalmers
“The only way to stop (this) run-away train is to stop pretending that there is one and realize that it is only fellow human beings you have to deal with!!! “
***
Oh, were it only that simple.
Which human beings would you start with?
A loaded deck of Supremes, who no matter what will fall on the side of oligarchy?
An administration that has very effectively maintained, and expanded on, the control established by previous neo-public servants over everything, from the congress to the Pentagon to the media? All for the sake of the oligarchy.
A population so buried in debt and doubt, and fear. And lacking a decent education [not having a clue who, or what the oligarchy is] are powerless to resist the neo-public servants assault on reason?
A million real public servants and their dependents, and those who depend on those dependents for income?
[How many millions would that be? How many billions of dollars?]
The oligarchs who reign and have reigned unabated for centuries?
Who would you go after first?
Imagine those figures in the billions of dollars it takes to keep those millions of people moving, are in weight and volume. A huge mass. Now, imagine each mass occupies many cars in a train. A train so long it is impossible to communicate from one end to the other, or even to the middle. Certainly not to the engine. Then imagine the engineer has the train at full throttle, and he’s going down hill. And he has no intention of slowing, or even sounding the whistle, because he’s having to much fun driving that train. And even if he wanted to slow and control, he couldn’t because the momentum of the mass in back is pushing so hard, should he brake he would throw cars off the track and where’s the fun in that?
So he goes faster.
Now imagine the group called congress waiting in the depot. Clearly someone needs to throw the switch and get this train on a different track, before it crashes into the depot taking them and all that mass in all those cars to kingdom come. But, no-one is throwing the switch! Why?
Why? Because they’re all to busy dickering over whether or not they should throw the switch, and which switch to throw, and how to do it and who gets to do it! And besides, is that what the oligarchy wants?
Now, are we supposed to rush in like the Lone Ranger and save these guys?
How? By pulling them out of the depot?
A lot of us are on that train!
And a lot of us on that train think the train needs to be smaller.
And a lot of us on that train want it to stop.
But we’re on the train and congress is sitting on the switch!
Son, we are in a real mess.
Report thisBy Douglas Chalmers, November 14, 2007 at 10:48 pm #
#113635 by Tim Kelly on 11/14 at 6:01 pm: “People continue to fail to see the purpose and goal of the Democratic Party is to prevent anyone from defeating the fascist agenda of the Republican Party….”
Well, it is a TWO-HEADED MONSTER, TC!
Report thisBy Nancy, November 14, 2007 at 10:17 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Sovereignty = Loyalty
Report thisBy Tim Kelly, November 14, 2007 at 6:01 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
People continue to fail to see the purpose and goal of the Democratic Party is to prevent anyone from defeating the fascist agenda of the Republican Party.
Report thisBy Grappa, November 14, 2007 at 4:55 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Reason, all I can say Is Amen! As far as risking their careers I say if you don"t stand for something you will fall for anything. Do you think Ron Paul is loosing his support for the absolute objection to this war he has taken as a repub. I think his taking this ethical stand has actually strengthened him. I would suggest if Pelosi and some others would become warrior like, they would actually gain support with the people. Maybe its more about their corporate sponsors, to wit I say too bad! What we need isn’t term limits, which I think is unconstitutional, whereas public ally funded elections could be legislated and force the politicians to respond to the people..
Report thisBy reason, November 14, 2007 at 3:20 pm #
I know it might be an excercise in futility but as a citizen with just one vote I will cast it for the person who demonstartes a desire to follow the will of the people he is sworn to represent. I don’t know that he or she will be republican or democrat!
Report thisIt is is time we take our country back from the “political hacks” and thieves.
By Conservative Yankee, November 14, 2007 at 1:52 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
113551 by Mudwollow on 11/14 at 10:41 am
“We who want the impeachment of George Bush and the immediate withdrawal from Iraq have no choice but to demand these things of our politicians. But we also need to realize that politicians who take these actions are dead meat. Their careers will quickly end and if they continue to mouth off, the media will summarily demonize them. Thats not a lot for a politician to look forward to.”
WHAT?? How old are you??
Do you remember Wayne Morse? Margaret Chase Smith? William Cohen? Even Lyndon (there goes the South) Johnson.
There were stand up folks who didn’t give a rat’s ass about “their position” but cared deeply about how history viewed them.. I don’t buy the “poor them” garbage, as Harry S. Truman said: “if you can’t stand the heat/ etc. etc. etc…”
Possibly term limits are the best way to fix this situation. Its hard to imagine term limits would make it any worse.
We have “term limits” up in my part of the world they’re called “elections” Term limits are a tool people in the minority use to Musharraffize” our electoral process.
Report thisBy Mudwollow, November 14, 2007 at 10:41 am #
I probably reject the antics of the likes of Nancy-impeachment off the table- Pelosi and Diane-can’t we all just get along-Feinstein as much or more than anyone. These politicians have spent their entire lives making deals and compromises. They have worked hard and done amazingly well to keep themselves in these lifetime political positions. But we all need to step back and take a look at what we are really asking these lifetime politicians to do.
What we are asking these lifetime politicians to do is to throw their lifetime of work in the toilet and pull the handle. We are asking them to dump everything they have accomplished and commit political suicide. We are certain that a president who belongs behind bars is reason enough for them to take this action. We are sure that a war costing trillions of dollars and crippling the United States of America is reason enough for these politicians to “do the right thing”.
We who want the impeachment of George Bush and the immediate withdrawal from Iraq have no choice but to demand these things of our politicians. But we also need to realize that politicians who take these actions are dead meat. Their careers will quickly end and if they continue to mouth off, the media will summarily demonize them. That’s not a lot for a politician to look forward to.
Possibly term limits are the best way to fix this situation. It’s hard to imagine term limits would make it any worse.
Report thisBy Douglas Chalmers, November 14, 2007 at 8:35 am #
#113512 by Louise on 11/14 at 8:07 am: “...This is NOT courage! This is COWARDICE! We should STOP PLAYING!!! The only way to stop a run-away train is…”
The only way to “stop (this) run-away train” is to stop pretending that there is one and realize that it is only fellow human beings you have to deal with!!!
#113509 by Shenonymous on 11/14 at 7:54 am: “...I don’t conceive the mind as being a sense but that which processes sensations…... Cleansing their minds, that will be the hardest challenge of all….”
I think the author was suggesting that you start with YOURSELF, Shenonymous. Once we stop and do so, we then find that we are open to Inspiration….. and that we can see The Way!
Report thisBy Grappa, November 14, 2007 at 8:16 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Boy !the pres. must have been lick en his lips when Pelosi and comp. came into power under the strategy of finding common ground [bi- partisan] with the repubs.. When he heard her say such a stupid thing he must of said to himself, ‘this is great’, just keep doing what I been doing because they {the Dem’s] are scared of me. I will never compromise, so they will spend all their time spinning their wheels.
Report thisBy Louise, November 14, 2007 at 8:07 am #
“Is there a handbook somewhere on how to be a courageous dealmaker? Pelosi and Reid would love to read it.”
***
I think there is, and I think they’re reading it. And I think that’s the problem.
What they need to do is throw the damn “politics as usual” handbook in the garbage and start reading a few emails from home. And listening to phone calls from home ... and just plain LISTENING to the folks back home!
First, the notion that the whole problem is a lack of “bipartisanship” is bunk and hooey! In fact they have said that so much, the repubs are creating TV adds pushing this problem, with the clear implication that it’s the dems fault!
My gosh! When are the democrat leaders going to STOP LETTING the repubs set the agenda?
This is NOT courage!
This is COWARDICE!
Why oh why cant they understand every time they capitulate with the excuse they are trying to find common ground both parties can agree to, they are actually caving in to the tried and true and very old habit the repubs have of forcing their will on others, even if they destroy the country in the process?
Are they afraid they’ll lose control of congress?
Well the pure and simple truth is, if they don’t stand up and fight, they will!
People have short memories. People don’t care anymore about how or who started the war. They just want it to end!
And slowly people are beginning to realize the Constitution is being trashed by this administration. And they want that to stop!
And finally people are beginning to see a need for kicking the burning bush and his water carrier out of government. Because even the diehard “real” conservatives are fed up.
As long as pollsters can find 500 people who approve of Bush there will be speeches and endless lies. And as long as the RNC keeps shipping those 500 supporters around to cheer him on, his ego will keep his little mind churning and main-stream media will have their news. We cant expect them to change, they have already spent the money.
And if congressional leaders continue on ignoring the fact that the majority in this country think Bush is way off course, and continue trying to “compromise,” things can only get worse. And whatever any candidate, save Kucinich, says will change nothing.
Because they ARE all reading that STUPID handbook about courageous dealmaking. The big mystery is why none of them have yet realized the repubs wrote the handbook. And being the authors, they have no problem with re-writing the content at a moments notice.
Should we stop playing fair?
Of course not.
We should STOP PLAYING!!!
Because no matter what pundits and politicos and Chris Matthews says, this is not a game!
And while it’s fun to poke fun at the idiots, their behavior being naturally comical, it’s past time to get deadly serious!
Impeachment, Impeachment, Impeachment. That should be what we say every day in every way to any and all.
Report thisThe only way to stop a run-away train is to GET IT OFF THE TRACK!
By Shenonymous, November 14, 2007 at 7:54 am #
Waxing poetically is not practical. Since all things of action needs a starting point, shall we start with the politicians eyes? Or ears, tongue, or body? I dont conceive the mind as being a sense but that which processes sensations, but do convince me it is otherwise.
So lets arbitrarily start with the eyes of the politicians, how shall we make them see? My suggestions is to start showing the bodies of those killed in Iraq, both Iraqis, since there are upwards millions, and American soldiers (which hitherto has been banned from the visual media by our repressive government). We can also show the dying planet Earth and the effects of the ignored global warming, and Im sure others can give unending examples of sights of sores. Next we can take on the ears and play the screams of those killed, maimed, or otherwise tortured, subjugated, oppressed, broken, demoralized, or exploited, including those in America. It will be harder to cleanse the stench out of their and our noses, and the stigma that shows up on all our bodies. Cleansing their minds, that will be the hardest challenge of all.
Report thisBy Douglas Chalmers, November 14, 2007 at 7:24 am #
The only cure for materialism is the cleansing of the six senses (eyes, ears, nose, tongue, body, and mind).
Report thisIf the senses are clogged, one’s perception is stifled.
The more it is stifled, the more contaminated the senses become.
This creates disorder in the world, and that is the greatest evil of all.
Polish the heart, free the six senses and let them function without obstruction, and your entire body and soul will glow.
By Douglas Chalmers, November 14, 2007 at 7:22 am #
#113474 by Shenonymous on 11/14 at 5:26 am: “...How shall we make them realize the folly of their actions…?”
The penetrating brilliance of swords
Report thisWielded by followers of the Way
Strikes at the evil enemy
Lurking deep within
Their own souls and bodies
By Maab30, November 14, 2007 at 6:46 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
One of the biggest problems with the Democrats is that they don’t support their base. If they realized their power in Congress and really used it, their approval to disapproval poll numbers would be reversed.
Report thisBy Shenonymous, November 14, 2007 at 5:26 am #
Pragmatically speaking Chalmers, how shall we use Aikido to disarm the thugs in Washington? How shall we make them realize the folly of their actions? Especially when there are so many unenlightened that call the shots?
Report thisBy FFURKS, November 14, 2007 at 5:19 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
113360 by jbart on 11/13 at 3:10 pm
Read the FAQ you may be posting too many words (words are limited, what’d you think “free speech” meant you could write forever? (>:#
Report thisBy Douglas Chalmers, November 14, 2007 at 3:48 am #
#Quote: “Democrats in Congress are discovering what it’s like to live in the worst of all possible worlds. They are condemned for selling out to President Bush, and for failing to make compromises aimed at getting things done…...”
The real Art of Peace is not to sacrifice a single one of your warriors to defeat an enemy. Vanquish your foes by always keeping yourself in a safe and unassailable position; then no one will suffer any losses. The Way of a Warrior, the Art of Politics, is to stop trouble before it starts. It consists in defeating your adversaries spiritually by making them realize the folly of their actions. The Way of a Warrior is to establish harmony….. http://www-cse.ucsd.edu/users/paloma/Aikido/artpeace.html
Report thisBy Nancy, November 14, 2007 at 2:38 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
I’m glad to see they addressed this issue. There are a lot of lies from the crooks who are only interested in raping our government(our PEOPLE). Believe me, it angers me as well. I have to do extra research….I don’t see any of you staying up til 5 in the morning to do it! I’m tired; sick and tired, but after all, this IS WAR.
Report thisBy DennisD, November 13, 2007 at 8:55 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Every two, four or six years someone from either political party is up for reelection.
Stop complaining and vote anything other than the current “one” corporate party system we currently have.
Writers like EJ constantly rehash the same old crap to fill up columns. The current system must be working pretty well for them because they never get behind any alternatives that might lead to real change. Same candidates, same message, same results, same column.
Really f**king pathetic.
Report thisBy felicity, November 13, 2007 at 3:20 pm #
I echo what has been said in other comments. I also believe that since the office of president has accrued so much power, we should consider an amendment changing the two-thirds majority necessary to override a veto to a simple majority. Otherwise, we remain at the mercy of one individual, the president.
If checks and balances, a concept we revere, is to have any meaning, as the power of one branch increases, the power of the other branch must also increase.
As it is now, this republic more closely resembles a dictatorship.
Report thisBy jbart, November 13, 2007 at 3:10 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Why can’t I “post” my comment(s) anymore? TD keeps giving me an Error (undefined). Am I being censored?
Report thisBy Michael, November 13, 2007 at 1:05 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Mr. Dionne seems to be forever explaining why nothing can be done. Last time I checked you don’t need 60 votes to stop appropriations. 41 Senators could take turns reading the phone book and bring the troops home.
Report thisThe presidential candidates are no better. If you mean you must compromise in order to get reelected pay attention to Mr. Dionne. If, however, you wish to end the war stick your courage to the sticking point and get on with it. I’m tired of hearing the whine out of D.C. The Democratic Party is becoming the great enabling party to George Bush et al.
By Conservative Yankee, November 13, 2007 at 12:19 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
“Democrats in Congress, both house and senate sides, piss into the wind with their bills at controlling the price of gas…”
The congress may be able to “control the price” listed for gas in these United States, BUT that is far from the problem.
There are plenty of places where the Saudis, Canadians, and Russians can sell crude where there are no price controls.
In the early Seventies we saw the results of attempts to legislate the price of petro-chem products. lines, empty gas stations, and an financial decline one economist called “The worst since the Depression of 1899!!”
Anyway, I kinda got off track there.
Petroleum is sold using US dollars. the value of the dollar has been in steady decline since Bush took office a world dollar buys half what it bought in December of 1999. The Saudis, Russians, Venezuelans Canadians etc are not stupid. Why should they give the US a 50% discount? Sceptically, countries around the world are moving away from dollars to Euro’s for world trade. You think the price of gas is high now? wait till values for petroleum products are transfered to Euros.
Our century plus of energy dominance is just about over… UNLESS we get serious about alternatives. BUT Europe has us beat there too. the subsidies given to alternate energy developers in Holland, Denmark, and even Germany will allow those countries energy independence within a score of years. The USA does what?
Report thisBy don knutsen, November 13, 2007 at 9:18 am #
Rather then whine, why can’t the democrats get about the removal lof the president & vice president? What else could possibly be more important then getting rid of these sociopaths before they dig us even deeper into a hole we, as it is, are gonna have a hard time getting out of. What are we up to now 1.5 trillion in costs ( including the undeclared by this admin ) for their wars of choice ? Kucinich’s call for the impeachment of cheney is a start long in coming. But it is a start and its moved to the judiciary committee. Now is the time our congressman need to hear from the people. To begin the proceedings as the will of the people whose opinion cheney cares nothing for. Without that thug there bush is nothing but the feckless fool without direction..We need to help create a momentum for impeachment that can’t be ignored. If our congressman on both sides of the isle cared for our democracy then this would not be a partisan issue…Its up to the people to demand this. The republicans expect this to languish in committee and fade away ...we can’t allow that to happen. Write your representitives, keep the pressure on them to do their job (finally).
Report thisBy thomas billis, November 13, 2007 at 7:50 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
EJ I kept looking for the punchline in your piece and could not find it.Yes what a spot the rock a pres with a 30% approval rating .The hard place what they promised to get elected in 06.You would think they were miners as many cave ins they have had.If you run on ending the war and the people vote for you on that basis not to do it is a problem of your own making.EJ if you want to keep making excuses for the lame-o’s that run the democrat party you are free to do so but they are not fooling anybody in the real world hence the approval ratings.If they cannot get the job done and need some kind of book maybe they can steal the Republicans play book from the Clinton years.Failing that Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi can step down and give the leadership positions to the democratic equilavent of Newt Gingrich and Tom Delayy people who did not whine and got things done.
Report thisBy David, November 13, 2007 at 7:26 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
These Democrats do not deserve not one bit of sympathy. They took an oath to defend the constitution - PERIOD. They have utterly failed to do this. We didn’t put them in office to raise the minimum wage. Lou Dobbs has it right when he say Dems and Republicans are two wings on the same bird.
Pelosi knew about the warrentless wiretaps months before 9/11/01. They voted for and continue to fund illegal occupations. They voted the Iranian Revolutionary Gaurd a terrorist organization to pave the way for another war. They favor immunity for telecom co’s assisting the government in illegally spying on Americans. They approved an Attorney General who supports torture. They refuse to hold the administration accountable for their crimes in office.
Don’t listen to their words. Interpret their actions. People are getting sucked into a fabricated political drama that has little relevancy to true intentions. At least Republicans are forthright with their evilness!
Report thisBy RdV, November 13, 2007 at 7:05 am #
Is there any greater apologist for the Democrats than this fool?
Report thisThe Republicans never compromise. Never. But they demand “bi-partisan compromise” of the Democrats—who fall for it and capitulate constantly. Enough so that the charge of weak, cowardly spinelessness has gone to calculated complicity.
Who want the Democrats to seek compromise with fascists when they should be holding them accountable!
By mary, November 13, 2007 at 7:05 am #
Great comment from #113279, osage. I will fax this article with your comment to my Sen Jim Webb, not that it will do any good but it makes me feel like I’m doing something anyway..
Report thisBy Joe R., November 13, 2007 at 6:55 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
If the Democratic leadership was worth a damn thing they would have impeached Bush and Cheney when they first got control of the House and Senate.
What this administration has done is nothing short of criminal. They have completely destabilized the Middle East. They have reignited the nuclear arms race. They have allowed big business free reign over the environment and have caused millions of jobs to go overseas. They have trashed the Constitution and committed war crimes, and they have caused the deaths of many thousands of innocent people in their so called war on terror. The United States is rapidly turning into a right wing fascist police state. And the only thing these sleezeballs won’t steal is a red hot stove.
Except for Kucinich, no one else is doing anything about it. Not since Romes Caligula has a government been more ineffectually run. What the hell does Bush have to do to get these people to act in the best interest of the United States? Furthermore, why in the hell should we vote for any of these people if all there going to do is what ever the rich want. To hell with all of them.
Report thisBy anonymous, November 13, 2007 at 6:48 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
bushies don’t make deals
when something gets done, i’m pretty sure we the people got screwed
Report thisBy osage, November 13, 2007 at 6:46 am #
AMERICANS ARE BEING BETRAYED BY OUR LEADERS AND THEIR FOLLOWERS AND THEIR COWARDLY ENABLERS FROM BOTH POLITICAL PARTIES
George W. Bush personifies the most malevolent, irredeemable and diabolic aspects of mankind. Not only is he wantonly destructive, purposefully dishonest and shamelessly unremorseful, he disgracefully defends his catastrophic decisions by hiding and perpetuating the devastating impact they have on the lives of defenseless human beings. Hundreds of thousands of innocent children, women and men, who have not harbored a harmful thought toward another human being, have been murdered, eviscerated and maimed as a direct result of George W. Bush being the president of the United States of America. And yet, his overriding priority is to prolong the inhuman carnage he has instigated, not to end it. George W. Bush is an indelibly chilling example of what man is capable of doing to his fellow man…...the worst example imaginable.
IMPEACHMENT is the only means we have of stopping the devastating consequences of the unrelenting IGNORANCE, ARROGANCE, INCOMPETENCE, DISHONESTIES, INSECURITIES, HOSTILE TEMPERAMENT, VINDICTIVENESS and PRONOUNCED PSYCHOLOGICAL DEFECTS of George W. Bush. He is an intellectually and emotionally mean-spirited immature child who is destroying America’s honor and integrity single-handedly. And politically correct Democrats are standing by watching as he dismantles our Constitution and rules of law creating an all powerful and self-ruling/policing ONE branch oppressive/fascist American government. No individual in our history is more deserving of CONDEMNATION and IMPEACHMENT than George W. Bush! His legacies are DEATH, DESTRUCTION and CHAOS.
American political leaders must LOUDLY DENOUNCE his actions and policies as UNCONSTITUTIONAL, CRIMINAL and IMMORAL rather than VALIDATE them with their SILENT ACQUIESCENCE!
Report thisBy Shenonymous, November 13, 2007 at 6:31 am #
Looks like Dionne is on to something. Democrats are between a rock and a hard place. Replace those direct objects with Republicans (rock) and fellow Democrats running for president and Democrats with unsophisticated understanding of how politics work (hard place) then you can see a little better what is going on. Lets take the price of oil today for instance. At $100 a barrel you can only imagine how much it is going to cost at the pump and the gasoline industry is trigger-happy to pass that price along lickety split as it means more quick profit even though the effect of the price increase for the raw oil wont really take effect for some time. But we dont know that because the time relation between the price of crude and refined oil is not generally given to the public. Democrats want to pass a gasoline relief bill by Thanksgiving. But the mulish and recalcitrantly reactive Republicans in Congress purposely ignoring the Democrats mention they hope by Christmas some remedy can be made! What is that all about? Can you even guess? So Democrats in Congress, both house and senate sides, piss into the wind with their bills at controlling the price of gas, TO GIVE AMERICANS A F***NG BREAK, because not only Republicans refuse to help pass the bills, because of their insane greed for money and power, but the anesthetized president, George Bush, promises to veto any such bill put before him. They want to see how much farther each side can piss is what it seems to me. It’s a bloody contest and we are the ones bleeding. That is the way it works and that is why the economy is in the shittiest shape it has been in since the depression. You have been BUSHWHACKED and you had better believe it, or you will go down with the rats. The Democrats in Congress is still outnumbered and because of partisan politics have an impossible task of correcting the direction of the ship of state. George gleefully has said how thrilled he is that Democrats are hamstrung in Congress. The only ones who can do anything about this situation are you and you and you.
The Democratic candidates running for president, and any other office this time around (and dont forget that), ought to be screaming at Republicans and their president rather than trying to tear down fellow candidates. Democratic candidates ought to be drum-rolling their own plans, programs, ideas for restoring the countrys economic prosperity, to optimism and social efflorescence. Their own plans for ending the illegal war. Their own plans for a decent immigration program that would diminish the illegal immigrant problem. Their own plans for medical warranty, old age social security. And without a doubt, they should be taking colossal aim at the Republican candidates and making known in a very big way just how ruinous this Bush administration has been taking our budget from an incredible surplus to an astronomical deficit that this country will not recover from for decades. The Democratic candidates need to spark the public into national exhilaration and expectation. What is wrong with these Democratic candidates?
Report thisBy KISS, November 13, 2007 at 5:49 am #
Hey E J how about the expanded Peru NAFTA the dimmos voted for? How about Amnesty for illegals that the dimmos keep trying to shove down our throats? How about the Impeachment process off the table?
Report thisWe the voters have the ear of congress only when we vote, after that the corporate lap-dogs never hear us again. Time to dump the incumbents and bring in new blood.
How we got stiffed by the dimmos is a hard swallow.