LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.Best Political Blog Winner, 2007 Webby Awards, People's Voice and Jury.   Maggie Award Winning Truthdig Book Reviews
 
May 17, 2008
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Reports

Arts & Culture

Digs
Inside the Data Mine

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Reports

The Cancer From Within

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Nov 7, 2007
Cadet Chapel
usafa.af.mil

The famous Air Force Academy cadet chapel, once a place of nondenominational worship and reflection, seems to have become a focal point of evangelical indoctrination and conversion.

By David Antoon

“I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.  ...”
—Oath of Office

“Our mission is to educate, train, and inspire men and women to become officers of character motivated to lead the United States Air Force in service to our nation.”
—Air Force Academy mission statement

“We will not lie, steal, or cheat. ...”
—Air Force Academy honor code

“Military professionals must remember that religious choice is a matter of individual conscience. Professionals, and especially commanders, must not take it upon themselves to change or coercively influence the religious views of subordinates.”
—Religious Toleration (Air Force Code of Ethics, 1997)

Forty-two years ago, at the age of 18, I took the oath of office on my first day as an Air Force Academy cadet.  The mission of the academy was not only to train future leaders for the Air Force but for America as well, because, in the end, most academy graduates do not serve full military careers.  The honor code became an integral part of everyday life.  These are the values that I, and most graduates of the 1960s and early ’70s, took with us from our four years at the academy.

I, as did many graduates, underwent pilot training followed by tours of duty in Vietnam. Like military men and women of today, we did our best to become technically competent and professional leaders.  Never, during my four years at the academy and subsequent pilot and combat training, was the word warrior used; nor, whether as a cadet or officer, did I ever encounter “Christian supremacist” rhetoric.

In April of 2004, my son, after receiving a coveted appointment to the United States Air Force Academy, asked me to accompany him to the orientation for new appointees.  This 24-hour visceral event changed my life forever, and crushed my son’s lifelong dream of following in my footsteps.

The orientation began with a one-hour “warrior” rant to appointees and parents by the commandant of cadets, Brig. Gen. Johnny Weida.  The fact that the word warrior had replaced leadership was a signal of what was to follow.  I later learned that cadets, to determine when a new record was established, had created a game in which warrior was counted in each speech Weida gave.

My son and I then made our way to the modernist aluminum chapel, where I expected to hear a welcome from one or two Air Force chaplains offering counsel, support and an open-door policy for any spiritual or pastoral needs of these future cadets.  In 1966, the academy had six gray-haired chaplains: three mainline Protestants, two priests and one rabbi.  Any cadet, regardless of religious affiliation, was welcome to see any one of these chaplains, who were reminiscent of Father Francis Mulcahy of “MASH” fame. 

Instead, my son’s orientation became an opportunity for the academy to aggressively proselytize this next crop of cadets.  Maj. Warren Watties led a group of 10 young, exclusively evangelical chaplains who stood shoulder to shoulder.  He proudly stated that half of the cadets attended Bible studies on Monday nights in the dormitories and he hoped to increase this number from those in his audience who were about to join their ranks.  This “invitation” was followed with hallelujahs and amens by the evangelical clergy.  I later learned from Air Force Academy chaplain MeLinda Morton, a Lutheran who was forced to observe from the choir loft, that no priest, rabbi or mainline Protestant had been permitted to participate. 

I no longer recognize the Air Force Academy as the institution I attended almost four decades earlier.  At that point, I had no idea how invasive this extreme evangelical “cancer” had become throughout the entire military, that what I had witnessed was far from an isolated case of a few religious zealots.

In order to better understand this shift to a religious ideology at this once secular institution, I called the Academy Association of Graduates (AOG).  Its response:  “We don’t get involved in policy.” What I didn’t know was that the AOG, like the academy, had affiliations with James Dobson’s and Ted Haggard’s powerful mega-churches.  When Dobson’s Focus on the Family “campus” was completed, the academy skydiving team, with great ceremony, delivered the “keys from heaven” to Dobson.  During some alumni reunions, the AOG arranged bus tours of Focus on the Family facilities in nearby Colorado Springs, Colo.  I also learned that the same Monday night Bible studies discussed at orientation were taught by bused-in members of these evangelical mega-churches and that some spouses of senior academy staff members were employed by these same religious institutions.  It seemed that my beloved United States Air Force Academy had morphed into the Rocky Mountain Bible College.

The academy chaplain staff had grown 300 percent while the cadet population had decreased by 25 percent:  from six mainline chaplains to 18 chaplains, the additional 12 all evangelical.  The academy even gained 25 reserve chaplains, also nonexistent in earlier times, for a total of 43 chaplains for about 4,000 cadets, or one chaplain for every 100 cadets.

1   2   3   NEXT PAGE >>>

Email Newsletter

Get truth delivered to your inbox every week.

Previous item: A Vote for Mukasey Is a Vote for Torture

Next item: The Gender Trap

Jump to Comments

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

Comment Pages: «1 2 3 4 5 »

By cyrena, November 10, 2007 at 4:12 am #
(4164 comments total)

#112696 by Ernest Canning

Ernest, thanks so much for the link. It was excellent. And, I’m assuming you saw the interview that Amy Goodman had with Dennis Kucinich as well, since TD has so graciously posted it here for us.

I signed several petitions on the afterdowningstreet site while I was there. Had lots to say about Richard B. Cheney. I figure I’m already ‘under surveillance’ so it can’t get a whole lot worse. Still, just make sure if you guys don’t hear from me for any extended period of time, send help, (like a counter-rendition team).

I’m really proud of our Congressional Reps. (notice we have a substantial showing of our California ladies and gentleman who’ve sponsored this resolution) I’m delighted. (still pissed at Nancy though, and that’s not likely to change – ever.)

As for rowman, I’ve done a reassessment. His intelligence may be questionable, but his insanity is not. He’s crazy as a loon and a danger to society at large. Matter of fact, I think he’s a candidate for a ticking bomb perpetrator. So, we need to send blackwater to capture him, and then do some ‘enhanced interrogation’ (no torture, because that’s illegal) But for now, waterboarding would appear to be acceptable in his case. Mukasey still doesn’t know it’s torture, so I guess it’s good enough for rowman.

So, we’ll let that be cheney’s final act…he can order the detention and ‘enhanced interrogation’ of rowman, (either by his handpicked CIA goons, or the goons from blackwater) as he has done so many times before. Then, as soon as he’s impeached, we arrest his ass too. Eventually, we’ll get ‘em all.

I’ll set up the tribunal, and let you know as soon as I get a date, so you can mark it on your calendar.

Reply to this | Report this

By purplewolf, November 10, 2007 at 2:17 am #
(567 comments total)

#112629 Rae:

I agree with most your post but think I have tweaked it up a little better: {"If we’re created in “His” image he is as screwed up as we are.” Rae’s} Not quite Rae, since we as individuals can only screw up a little bit, on the other hand you times that screw-up by every person on the planet who was created in “His” image and that means that “He” has screwed up billions upon billions of more times than any one of us could ever do and over a lot longer period of time, not say the average life span of maybe 78 years or so, and will continue to do so long after we are all gone. So he had to be really messed up from the get-go. And look at all those anger issues in the Old Testament, it is obvious that God could not control his temper and often broke one of his very own commandments-thou shall not kill-on to numerous occasions to list them all here. Sort of the pot calling the kettle black or do as I say, not as I do syndrome And if we as humans are so full of sin and are made in “His” image what does that tell us?
I have always said that is man was made in Gods image then he must have been a pretty poor example to begin with.

#112693 Cyrena:

Fear not. Winter is on its way, we already have snow here in Michigan, and it’s time for all good bears and even the bad ones to go into hibernation for the winter. Now off to bed (your cave) like the rest of the bears. And if rowman cannot share your winter diggs with you, perhaps he can climb into his boat and row his way to the Persian Gulf for a vacation. I am certain the people will welcome him with OPEN ARMS.

Doug Chalmers: Sorry I spelled your name wrong. I really need new glasses but my insurance says next winter. It’s been over 3 years now and it’s medically long over due. But that’s how these insurance companies make their money, denying the proper medical treatments people need.

THE GREATEST DANGER TO THIS WORLD IS ORGANIZED RELIGION. ANYONE’S

Reply to this | Report this

By Douglas Chalmers, November 10, 2007 at 1:29 am #
(2932 comments total)

#112620 by VillageElder on 11/09 at 3:02 pm: “...This aspect of Christianity shares with Islam an aggressive conversion doctrine - convert as sword point. Religious freedom should also provide us with freedom from religion.  Democracy NOT Theocracy...”

People talk blithely and glibly about “democracy” in comparison to “religion” but they fail to understand that the same thing essentially happens. ONE party is chosen and the effect is a “one-party rule” for the other 49% of the population.

That is NOT freedom! And it is NOT “freedom from” the one-party states systems the USA is/was so fond of criticizing such as Russia once was and China still is. No wonder that the USA now has Blackwater and the USAF’s “Holy Warriors for Jesus” supporting fascism, etc etc......

#112621 by tyler on 11/09 at 3:02 pm: “...Religion should be banned from politics, and any other public forum, period....”

Yes, but how about banning politics from religion, tyler? That is what is happening today - as it was 1,000 years ago during the idiotic Christian crusades. Its all a show to lull the people at home and to deceive them into believeing how great their leaders are - and it always was!

Reply to this | Report this

By Ernest Canning, November 10, 2007 at 12:54 am #
(1624 comments total)

Well, you have a point Cyrena.  At times, I’ve been able to step back and chuckle at rowman’s lack of intelligence, but then I always come back to thinking that his is the type of mindlessness that you would have seen from those standing at the torch lit parades in Germany during the 1930s.

On a more positive note, if you haven’t watched it yet, go to

http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/cheney

Scroll down to the video which contains Dennis Kucinich’s Nov. 5 introduction of the articles of impeachment against Cheney.  It’s quite impressive.  In fact, it should be broadcast without interruption on every major network, but then, if it was, Kucinich would win in a landslide--precisely why it won’t be broadcast over the corporate media.

Reply to this | Report this

By Francis Norton, November 10, 2007 at 12:45 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Hi Douglas,

Yes, you do get an interesting perspective if you use the Order of Malta as a mirror to throw a dark reflection of past crusades back to the present situation.

Was Bush was being accidentally truthful with his original reference? (I just found http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0902-06.htm which expresses this line of thought far better than I could)

Can any glimmer of light be found in all this? Maybe one day there’ll be an “Order of Carlyle” where patrician Evangelicals gather to re-enact ancient business breakfasts while organising charitable activities?

Don’t think I’ll be around to see it, somehow.

All the best,

Francis.

Reply to this | Report this

By cyrena, November 10, 2007 at 12:24 am #
(4164 comments total)

• #112645 by Ernest Canning
“Is there no article at Truthdig that has not been infected by the mindless virus known as rowman?”
Ernest,
And at first, I was just gonna say – NO -. It would seem that he’s pretty much everywhere we look, and pretty stomach churning, to say the least.
But then, after doing some work for an unrelated project, I came to the decision that he may indeed serve a purpose, not unlike a flu shot. As we know, most virus inoculations have a bit of the ‘virus’ itself, in the preparation. Supposedly, it provides the body with an ‘immunity’ of sorts, so that should they be exposed to a fuller version of it at some point in time, they will have this ‘immunity’ from having had the virus already injected into their systems, and thereby be able to fight off any future exposures; or, at least make the future contacts less disastrous.
Now of course rowman is more like an extra strong version of that virus, and probably enough to at least temporarily disable those who are totally without an immune system, (like the very innocent or naďve). But for the majority, I think he acts as a pretty good variable for what should pretty much keep everybody on their toes. And, it seems to work pretty well, if you cruise through the comments. Matter of fact, I found the responses to him, (from so many other posters) to be very uplifting. It shows that our populace, and our fellow citizens are NOT stupid, and NOT fooled, and NOT naďve, and very intelligent, with excellent insight and character analysis capabilities. So, that’s good.
That said, I should make it clear that this is not an ENCOURAGEMENT, (just like I don’t really recommend the flu shot for most of the public). And, it would certainly be perfectly OK with me, if he never shows his name again, or writes anymore of his pornography. On the other hand, at least we have a defense for it, and quite a strong one, judging from the character and depth of the responses. So, that’s one way to look at it.

#112596 by Robert Giacobbe
Robert,
I had no idea we’d disagreed in the past, but you’re right, it’s gotta be secondary. In fact, disagreement isn’t really such a bad thing. I actually welcome it, (in the right settings) because for lots of people, it’s the only way they learn of any other opinions, or even any other facts. Besides, I’m sort of a professional arguer. Well, no…take that back. I’m more like a wanna-be professional arguer, or maybe ‘arguer-in-training’. I once had a professor ask a fellow student why he wanted to be a lawyer, when he hated to argue. Gee, that was MY clue to decide that it would be ‘just the thing’ for me. I love it!!

I’ve since changed my mind, at least until we get back to maybe, possibly, actually using the rule of law. I mean, what the hell good does it do to learn all of this stuff, (the law) if nobody pays any attention to it anyway? Makes me wonder if there’s only a few of us left with a mostly intact copy of the Constitution. Meantime, all is not lost, since I have another professor colleague that gets all impatient with our ‘laid back’ mentality in California. She’s from the east, and complains that she can’t find anybody to fight with out here. So, just as an occasional ‘fix’ for her, we’ll start an argument or so from time to time.

Anyway, if you remember, let me know whatever we disagreed on. I may have changed my mind by now. On the more important issue, yes….the Driving Bear needs to be driven back into his cave, and he can bring rowman with him. Or, maybe the bear can row the man. Or..whatever. As long as they just go back to whatever rocks they crawled out from under, and stay there, so as not to continue to poison the rest of the atmosphere.

On the other hand, like I mentioned to Ernest Canning, they can at least serve a useful purpose, as an example of who/what/how NOT to be.

Reply to this | Report this

By magix, November 9, 2007 at 8:06 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Thank you, Colonel for writing this and thank your son for his decision.  Your service is much appreciated and your defense of our constitution could not be more needed.

Reply to this | Report this

By Ernest Canning, November 9, 2007 at 5:35 pm #
(1624 comments total)

Is there no article at Truthdig that has not been infected by the mindless virus known as rowman?

Reply to this | Report this

By Non Credo, November 9, 2007 at 3:45 pm #
(1145 comments total)

The Christian crazies have always been there, but it’s important to realize what has empowered them. Important impediments have been removed.

Most importantly, one of their natural enemies, the Jewish community, has been removed as an effective obstacle, because Christian crazies have taken up the right-wing Likudnik position on Israel, aligning them with the leadership of the major Jewish organizations (even though ordinary Jews are more liberal in their positions than their self-annointed leaders).

America’s militant Christian right used to be checked politically by, among other things, our liberal Jewish community.

But now that the right-wing leadership of the major Jewish organizations, the rest of the Israel lobby, and the Christian right have joined forces in pushing for their radical Middle East war agenda, there seems little to stop the cancer of religious militarism from destroying America.

Reply to this | Report this

By RAE, November 9, 2007 at 3:33 pm #
(353 comments total)

“We all sin. We are all guilty of sin.”

This is PURE BULLSHIT, rowman. It is the fundamental assumption of Christianity… start with GUILT and go from there. Once you’ve got them on their knees, convinced they’re no good, you can fleece them till the cows come home. Great strategy… for bullies, thieves and con artists.

I admit, SOME humans are pure evil. A VERY FEW are so angelic as to not-to-be believed! But MOST OF US are complex combinations of situational good and bad - that’s the NORMAL HUMAN CONDITION and we have NO APOLOGIES TO MAKE TO ANYONE or ANY “MAKER” for it. That’s the way we are and we don’t have to beg forgiveness from anyone or any"thing".

Has anyone but me noticed the inherent incongruency and irony in the assumption that some omnipotent, PERFECT “being” created us and everything else IN HIS IMAGE, and we turn out DEFECTIVE? What bullshit! If we’re created in “HIS” image, then HE’S as SCREWED UP AS WE ARE!

You can’t have it both ways, fundies!

Reply to this | Report this

By Hemi*, November 9, 2007 at 3:11 pm #
(183 comments total)

Chris G.

“-There was nothing mindless about our nuclear attacks on Japan.  You probably believe you’re educated so I’ll pay you the compliment of not exlpaining it to you.”

You appear to have no knowledge that the participants at all levels in the Manhattan Project were at moral odds with what they were doing. If you’d ever read anything regarding Robert Oppenheimer and his life leading up to and following the war, you wouldn’t use the term mindless. Some have described the bombings as unnecessary but that is at best conjecture and those questioning were never in danger of being asked to invade Japan. There is no comparing the bombing of Japan with brainwashing pilots to accept they will at some point be bombing for Jesus.

Great, you picked up on Hemi being short for hemisphere. Exactly that with no ties to any engine. Long story and not necessary here. You on the other hand are “Chris” short for Christian? We’ll let the irony slide, you’re an atheist that accepts religious hazing. Oh yeah, not cowardly, simply survival of the fittest. I should have known. Congratulations you survived!

You come in throwing around the O’Reilly attitude, “I said my prayers like a good little atheist” and punctuate your rant with “bloviate” and then take offense that other commenters (I’m not alone) picked up on your O’Reilly worship. I was also implying Billy boy was your “invisible friend” but that went over your non-theist head. You can’t hide your wings Chris, right-wings. O’Reilly and Rush have the same stance on questioning the path of the military.

“The Naval Academy graduates 800 people every year, many of whom (myself included) go on to do nothing overly important.”

And that makes you the perfect candidate to criticize David Antoon and his take on the state of the Air Force Academy.

Happy Holidays Chris (Bill would hate that!)

Reply to this | Report this

By Shawn Smith, November 9, 2007 at 3:06 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

rowman - I think we agree. Maybe you misunderstood my comment. I am not lumping all Christians together. I am calling out the evangelical fringe as non-Christian posers.

“There are always those who take it upon themselves to defend God, as if Ultimate Reality, as if the sustaining frame of existence, were something weak and helpless. These people walk by a widow deformed by leprosy begging for a few paise, walk by children dressed in rags living in the street, and they think, ‘Business as usual.’ But if they perceive a slight against God, it is a different story… These people fail to realise that it is only on the inside that God must be defended, not on the outside. They should direct their anger at themselves.

Let God defend God.”

- Yann Martel, Life of Pi

Reply to this | Report this

By tyler, November 9, 2007 at 3:02 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Religion should be banned from politics, and any other public forum, period.

How about amending the constitution to say, ‘One nation under TRUTH.’

I challenge ANYONE in any abrahamic denomination, to show the world ‘God’.  Bring Him down and introduce Him.  Show us, Let us see Him.

I’m christian, but I haven’t seen God, so I don’t really KNOW that He exists.  Hence the principle of faith.

Let Him speak for Himself, because those in public positions, particularly elected officials that profess to be speaking for him are bastardizing His word for their own gain.

Reply to this | Report this

By VillageElder, November 9, 2007 at 3:02 pm #
(102 comments total)

This article ties in with discussion of the Blackwater folks in several scary ways.

#112288 by cyrena on 11/08 at 4:17 am

Cyrena - I’ve enjoyed your commentary on this.  Some of your phrases remind me of my stepdaughter, and my wife has had a few chuckles.

The Christian Right (christies) have had a stealth agenda for years,as announced by Pat Robert$on.  In elections they run without announcing their bias.  They take over school boards removing books which they consider satanic from the libraries, e.g., books by Richard Scary(sp?).  This infiltration of the military is not good.  It gives authoritar1ans yet another method of control over their charges.  The prospect of another round of “Holy Warriors for Jesus” supporting fascism is truly frightening.

Blackwater was founded by the scion of a theo-con family and has a high percentage of christies.  These are troops available for use without the constitutional restraints which our armed services should respect.

This aspect of Christianity shares with Islam an aggressive conversion doctrine - convert as sword point.

Religious freedom should also provide us with freedom from religion. 

Democracy NOT Theocracy

Reply to this | Report this

By Ron, November 9, 2007 at 1:14 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

A few years ago, I was visiting the mother of a childhood friend. Her daughter was there with her husband, a fundamentalist chaplain stationed at Guantanamo where the prisoners are held.  After blessing the “bounty” of Chinese take-out I had brought, he related to me how he had been interviewed by Vanity Fair, and he was offended when the reporter asked him if there was any difference between him and the Islamic fundamentalists.  I told him I thought it was a fair question (I had been trained in the military as an information specialist - or military liaison - with the civilian press). I also asked if he had cleared the interview first with PIO (Public Information Office), which would never have allowed the interview in the first place. He hadn’t. When I told him he had set himself up for not clearing the interview with PIO, and that it was a fair question, he stormed out of the room and never appeared again before I left. Those Fundies can be so funny sometimes.

Reply to this | Report this

By lennybruce, November 9, 2007 at 11:41 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Oh my God! (no pun intended). This indicates a very dangerous trend not only in the military but as a reflection of the broader trend of religionization of American society and politics. The true existential danger to America’s ‘way of life’ does not come from religious extremists from without but from those within.

Reply to this | Report this

By rowman, November 9, 2007 at 11:02 am #
(116 comments total)

Shawn Smith,
You cannot lump all Christians together and accuse them of this. There are many denominations and individuals that do live up to the tenants of Christianity and do to the best of their ability try to adhere to Christian values. What you are referring to is fringe (small) groups who call themselves Christians but are not. The author here is biased against Christians and you have to take it with a grain of salt.

We all sin. We are all guilty of sin. Start with the Ten Commandments and work your way to the Mosaic Law. We are all guilty. It was the Messiah’s purpose to free us from the law as no one can be justified before G-d by it. This gives you a path to sanctification and by this, a new law is placed on your heart. Everything in this law is by its very core, good. G-d is good. Is there a single commandment that you could point to that is bad? No, you can’t.

So long as the USAF cadet doctrine they are practicing is correct, only good can come from it. I am sure there are many doctrines represented but the author fails by lumping them all together.

And by the way, all of this chaotic mess you see in the world, it is as indented and will be until his return.

Reply to this | Report this

By xyzaffair, November 9, 2007 at 10:58 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Military and fundamentalist Christian thinking seem to go hand-in-hand:  If someone does not see things as you do or has a grievance against you, that person is an enemy and must be dealt with in an appropriate manner.  I witnessed this thinking when I was in Air Force officer training at Lackland AFB, Texas.  I was there when the US Embassy hostages were seized in Iran in 1979.  An instructor was lecturing about armed response and asked the class how the US might respond to the hostage crisis.  Many in the class replied, “Nuke ‘em!” The instructor responded, “Well, we could do that.” I only met one military person in my four-year Air Force career who understood the background of US involvement in Iran.

Reply to this | Report this

By Scott, November 9, 2007 at 10:42 am #
(215 comments total)

Why does an omnipotent God need an air force anyway?

I just don’t get it.

Reply to this | Report this

By WriterOnTheStorm, November 9, 2007 at 10:14 am #
(74 comments total)

Interesting comments, not the least for what has been completely overlooked.

From this open-eyed viewpoint, it seems hypocritical, to say the least, to get worked up over religious proselytizing while completely ignoring the political, social and moral coercion that every soldier undergoes. This brainwashing is the sine qua non of all military training. 

What is the difference between a cadet fighting for Christianity and capitalism, and a Vietcong guerilla fighting for Communism and Buddhism? Both stand for belief sets that can be challenged, studied, proven effective or ineffective, logical or illogical. In time, both belief sets may be completely invalidated in mainstream thinking.

Everyone who fights, fights for a belief. Some say there are no atheists in foxholes. It’s true in this sense: a genuine atheist, is someone who treats ALL dogmatic belief systems, be they political, social, religious etc, as fair game for a rigorous and unbiased criticism.

I suspect that some of you are secretly comforted that American soldiers are Full Metal Jacket style automatons. You assume that fighting FOR a belief set makes them more effective, and you may be correct.

But I’ll take the WWII soldier any day. Those who came to the reasonable, and logical conclusion that some belief sets are dangerous enough to fight AGAINST.

Reply to this | Report this

By Bert, November 9, 2007 at 9:56 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

I used to be in the service, and the biblechurchies
started leaning on me pretty heavily, and I didn’t
really even understand the motivation at the time,
but it’s all become a lot clearer now during the
time I’ve spent reading about some of the changes
that’ve taken place in our military. It’s not too
surprising, I guess, to learn that evangelists
have added themselve to the long and not-so-distinguished list of people that’ve made a career
out of lifting money, yes, money, out of our
servicemembers’ wallets. But, after you get people
to believe in the invisible man, then you can
squeeze em for every penny possible, but first you
gotta get em hypnotized. Well, on reflection I have
this to say: FUCK the army. Take a big armload of
your religious literature, and go kiss a speeding
bus. I mean that in the nicest way possible, of
course. Well, not really. But you get the idea.

Reply to this | Report this

By nct, November 9, 2007 at 8:32 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

MOT - Might I inquire as to your own nationality?

Reply to this | Report this

By Dave Mende, November 9, 2007 at 8:12 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Somehow these evangelicals believe armageddon is a good thing.  That by causing and effecting mass murder Jesus will return to rule over the Earth and bless them. Does this seem logical to you?  Murdering little children (Iraqblockade, Lebanon) to seek divine sanction?  It is uncanny how most of the murder of innocent civilians is manifested of the air force. Those bombs ain’t as smart as they seem. When I am elected President I intend to buy billboards and display the tortured faces of the murdered children to all americans.  My people must see the hell they have created in the name of Jesus. These evangelicals will cause Jesus to turn his face away from america. No air force can save us from God’s judgement. Thanks a lot, semper fi and all that. Sheeeesh.

Reply to this | Report this

By Hugh Duffy, November 9, 2007 at 7:10 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

I have just read David Antoon’s article regarding evangalising in the US military. That plus some of the comments of your readers. And you purport to be the most Christian and most powerfull country in the world?

God help us all

H. Duffy UK

Reply to this | Report this

By Hammo, November 9, 2007 at 6:45 am #
(372 comments total)

Spiritual awareness can be helpful when done in a reasonable and intelligent way.

When it is part of a kind of coercive “brainwashing” that is apparently going on at the Air Force Academy, it is destructive.

Understanding human consciousness and its potential is important, if not crucial. New discoveries in this area are surprising.

Military leaders need to get up to speed on this and get away from the evangelical mind control.

Those truly interested in spirituality and connection to a larger spiritual force and intelligence can find better ways to do this.

Information related to this in the two articles ...

“Emerging discoveries in human consciousness may change many global activities”

http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle. asp?articleID=27957

- - -

“Amazing enhanced human perception abilities are emerging, say researchers”

http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle. asp?articleID=20423

Reply to this | Report this

By Deborah, November 9, 2007 at 6:32 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Reports like this make it definitely hard to keep the faith.

I am a believer and it is very hard to see my faith described as a “cancer”. Yet, the way Christianity is manipulated and insinuated into our government and now our military is exactly that.

I know it’s hard to believe but there are people like me out there: People who are Christian but not fanatical - who believe faith should be used to uplift people, help and guide them - not to be used as threats of hellfire and damnation if they don’t serve God by killing in his name.

This insidious twisting of faith must be stopped.

Reply to this | Report this

By medicis, November 9, 2007 at 6:14 am #
(1 comments total)

the USAFA cadets may be more religious (unfortunately) but they are definitely not more ‘christian’.

I think the author got it entirely correct. Cancer.

btw, ‘bear’ ain’t got a clue as to what ‘secular’ means. Nor, for that matter, “sour grapes” - since he or she misapplies it. Use a dictionary, ‘Bear’.

Further, I am a follower of Christ’s teachings and I am an actual conservative. So, I don’t what ‘bear’ is but it is certainly not Christian and certainly not a true conservative. Sounds more neoconish to me.

Reply to this | Report this

By Chris G., November 9, 2007 at 5:18 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

@ Hemi* - your comments are truly laughable.  I’ve been on a lot of message boards, and I’ve never seen somebody come out in the wrong direction as quickly as you did.  In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised if an automated bot responded to my comments and attached your name to the post - it’s that formulaic.  For example:

“You’ve got a lot of god damned nerve throwing that out like it’s an every day event for the people serving this country to mindlessly blow the crap out of civilians.”

-There was nothing mindless about our nuclear attacks on Japan.  You probably believe you’re educated so I’ll pay you the compliment of not exlpaining it to you.

“Although with the record of the current adminsitration maybe I’m mistaken, Mr. or is it Ms unregistered idiot?”

-It’s Mr.  The fact that I’m unregistered means nothing.  Neither does the fact that you’ve named yourself after the hemispherical combustion chamber in a gasoline chamber.  I’d rather be unregistered.

“You are the “bloviating” one. So what if you survived the Naval Academy? You admit to seeing corruption there and did nothing and are proud of it. I’m betting that like the Naval Academy, nothing was ever improved by your presence.”

-Exactly, so what.  The Naval Academy graduates 800 people every year, many of whom (myself included) go on to do nothing overly important.  As for the Naval Academy ever improving anything, that’s your call alone.  Jimmy Carter and Roger Staubach might disagree.  As for agreeing to seeing “corruption”, I admitted no such thing.  The only corruption I really saw was when the football players (or any varsity athlete, for that matter) didn’t have to go through the same routine as the rest of us because they were “special”.

“You are a liar and a coward. There’s no way in hell that you are an atheist. You couldn’t get through a day without your invisible friend telling you what to do. Take your Bill O’Reilly worshipping carcass; say your prayers like a good swabby and crawl back in that bottle you stumbled out of.”

-This is where you completely degenerated.  Not an atheist?  I don’t believe in god - any god.  I don’t believe in organized religion at all.  That’s all I need to say.  I also don’t need to “lie” on some unknown message board in order to prove some other point that you alone are seeing.  Bill O’Reilly?  The guy is a clown.  So is Rush Limbaugh.  So is Nancy Pelosi.  So what?  What does that have to do with me? 

Listen “Hemi” - maybe you’re a “big man on campus” on this board, what with a few posts under your belt.  However, if they’re anything like this last one was, it’s doubtful anybody really takes you seriously outside of your one-sided circle. 

Good luck.

Reply to this | Report this

By jt, November 9, 2007 at 4:57 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

TURNING and turning in the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.

Surely some revelation is at hand;
Surely the Second Coming is at hand.
The Second Coming! Hardly are those words out
When a vast image out of Spiritus Mundi
Troubles my sight: somewhere in sands of the desert
A shape with lion body and the head of a man,
A gaze blank and pitiless as the sun,
Is moving its slow thighs, while all about it
Reel shadows of the indignant desert birds.
The darkness drops again; but now I know
That twenty centuries of stony sleep
Were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle,
And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?

Literature Network » William Butler Yeats » The Second Coming

Reply to this | Report this

By cyrena, November 9, 2007 at 4:23 am #
(4164 comments total)

#112441 by Robert Giacobbe

• In regards to #112428 by driving bear, help me understand exactly what you believe you’ve won in this struggle.
I’m sure you’ll give some bullshit answer about eternal salvation, so let me tell you what I think the so-called christian conservatives have won:
Robert Giacobbe,
You have just made my day, (and it’s EARLY no less) Yep you win the prize, since I’m framing this in gold. Oh, I do love it. I don’t want to repost the entire thing, but can I just redo my absolute favorites, and can we make sure to copy rowman in on this as well. (I mean, he and DB are in the same pod, rowman is especially fond of torture) So, here are my absolute favorites….
• —The right to subjugate women because your little-dick syndrome prevents you from being a real man and treating the opposite sex as an equal partner, someone with which to enjoy life
That’s favorite #1. How did you tag them both so well? It’s like you’re a mind reader.

• - The right to stumble about like idiots and blather on with your idiotic “theories” on complex topics like evolution, embryology, and geology

This is favorite #2. (though I admit they’re all so on target, that it’s hard to pick)

Now Driving Bear is really good at this one. He emphatically states that there is NO WAY that Christian Conservatives, (read right-radical lunatics) are gonna ‘stand by” while a million babies are murdered by abortion, (or something like that). Doesn’t matter if he knows their mothers, or if he even knows that they’re pregnant, or that he’ll never see any of them, (even if they’re born) and he DAMN sure doesn’t want any of his tax dollars (if he pays taxes) spent on them, after their born. No health care either. None of that. All he knows is that there’s no way that Christian Conservatives are gonna ‘stand-by’ and let that happen.

• - The right to be the laughing stock for the rest of civilized society
- And the right to be trounced in any kind of public debate that you would dream of entering when it comes to evangelizing your particular brand of bullshit.

I combined these two, but they’re close in content, and this is exactly what it is. Goes with the little-dick syndrome. These types always have the biggest guns. They probably sleep with ‘em.

Meantime, Driving Bear isn’t worried about any of this stuff. He’s already said that he ‘stands by” whatever bullshit it was that he was ‘standing-by’ before. So, at least he’s consistent in being the laughing stock for the rest of civilized society.

Oh my. This was enjoyable. Thanks again.

Reply to this | Report this

By cyrena, November 9, 2007 at 3:47 am #
(4164 comments total)

#112511 by Shawn Smith

Thanks Shawn Smith,

This is an excellent post. I will share it with those Christians that I know and love, whom I refuse to allow to be swept up into the madness, corruption and perversion of whatever it is these evildoing Evangelicals are selling.

Well, at least that’s what I’ve been trying to do. Sometimes it works, and sometimes it doesn’t. It just depends on how many of them are actually able to think for themselves, and haven’t become indoctrinated to Christianity as a political party movement.

Now THOSE are some hateful folks.

Reply to this | Report this

By Douglas Chalmers, November 9, 2007 at 2:08 am #
(2932 comments total)

#112513 by Francis Norton on 11/09 at 12:22 am: “...As a card-carrying atheist of Catholic origin I was really impressed with this article until I got to the phrase:- COO Schmitz, another Naval Academy graduate, is a member of the Order of Malta, a Christian supremacist organization dating back to the Crusades...”

That’s very interesting that you should pick up on the Knights of Malta, Francis Norton, as it it the historical point of diversion from the military to a medical fraternity. In other words, they were an organization of naturopaths and physicians and had little originally to do with ‘the military” except that they were set up to treat their wounds and so forth during the “Christian crusades”.

Even their name had nothing to do with “knights” (The Knights of Malta) or “orders of chivalry” and they were simply the “Ordre des Hospitaliers”. What is chivalry anyway except a bunch of smelly old horse soldiers who presumed to be better than their fellows because the knight was awarded a few acres of land to keep a couple of horses on and a servant to look after them?

That is how things were organized in those days but it was another matter that the Order of Malta then morphed into some kind of military organization itself although perhaps actually only a kind of garrison guard. The Catholic church only took over at a much later date as they often did. Having its own order and, thus, princes was how utterly arrogant the Roman church really was.

Therefore, in the terms of the USAF, the Order of Malta is indeed once again being misused as “a Christian supremacist organization” and its relationship to the era of the Christian “crusades” is also possibly being misinterpreted to align certain individuals with their contemporary conquering hero, Bush the Texan Idiot.

Although the Order was to Malta like Columbus was to Cuba, the island has little strategic relevance today compared even with a place like Diego Garcia. Again, it was far more significant, strategically, when the Europeans were contending with the Arabs and the Turks in those days long past. Today, the US military is just plain confused with its own self-importance!

But, as you say, perhaps we should remember “a Glorious Tradition” and try to get the mad bombers of the world, the USAF to understand as well, uhh.

Quote: “Medicine replaces the sword as the Order of Malta continues to heal the sick and assist the poor across the world........ Remaining relevant in a world so different from the days of the first Crusades takes a special kind of commitment. Very few Orders of Chivalry have survived into the modern day, but one Religious and Sovereign Order, of particular importance to the island of Malta...” http://www.guidetomalta.net/knights-of-malta.htm

Reply to this | Report this

By PARAMASVARAN Kandiah, November 9, 2007 at 1:40 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

It is pathetic that religion must again be over emphasised to fight wars created by men themselves. More people have been killed in the name of religion in the past 2000 years vis-a-vis the dawn of history and all in the name of God. I can understand a Christian Army fighting against a heathen army. But when two Christian armies face each other - whom does Jesus support. This aspect has always disturbed my peace of mind because Isa Ben Yusof did not preach war but LOVE and to turn one’s face to the other side to receive the next slap.

The main theme of His sojourn on Earth was to inculcate LOVE of ALL things and Non Violence. He asked the question “ What would one benefit if he were to gain the whole world but lose his own Soul.”

Science shows us that our petty Earth is only a small dust in this Galaxy of ours and that there are BILLIONS of similar galaxies in the Universe. Will one MAN gain the entire Universe and become GOD? What are MEN fighting for actually. Are Love, Compassion, Sympathy etc not far greater than the entire Universe - subject to the existence of other parallel Universes propounded by some Scientists.

Or has the entire Abrahamic religions to be wiped out before these factors can come into play again on this Earth.

Probably such a happening may come about in the course of time seeing how the Abrahamic religions are trying to vault one over another.

The only religions that seem to have escaped from continuous cruel wars are Hinduism, Buddhism ( an Off shoot of Hinduism) and related religions to the Vedic ‘thoughts’ of non violence and vegetarianism. Buddha was born a Hindu and died a Hindu. Hence the religion defined as Hinduism today encompasses a major part of the world’s entire population.

Reply to this | Report this

By Francis Norton, November 9, 2007 at 12:22 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

As a card-carrying atheist of Catholic origin I was really impressed with this article until I got to the phrase

COO Schmitz, another Naval Academy graduate, is a member of the Order of Malta, a Christian supremacist organization dating back to the Crusades

I know at least a couple of members of the order (from the UK and Hungary) and while you could certainly call them serious Roman Catholics they couldn’t be less like American Evangelicals, or in sympathy with their ambitions, and I really don’t think you can describe Order of Malta as “Christian supremacist” in any meaningful way.

It really makes me wonder about the quality of the rest of the article if the author can make a claim like that about an organisation like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_malta.

Reply to this | Report this

By Shawn Smith, November 8, 2007 at 11:59 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

I don’t know how the evangelicals can consider themselves good Christians. They like to ignore everything Jesus said about peace, compassion and judging other people - in other words, they ignore most of what Jesus talked about.

In Jesus’ own time, the Pharisees and Sadducees were the fundamentalists, believing that they practiced the only “true” religion. They forced their beliefs on everyone else and ultimately had Jesus crucified for promoting different a different way. Today’s evangelicals are the new Pharisees and Sadducees.

What happened to the Golden Rule? Turn the other cheek? Love your enemies? Blessed are the peacemakers? Judge not...?

After September 11, this administration’s first thought - even before comforting the victims - was about revenge. It’s understandable, but it’s weak, and it’s not a Christian response.

A true Christian is someone who can practice compassion, who can love his enemies, during times when it’s most difficult to do so.

Christianity is not the problem. The evangelicals are the problem, and they are not real Christians.

Reply to this | Report this

By AF, November 8, 2007 at 11:27 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

I’m sure Christians as we knew them had lost all control of the military about the same time they let women into the Academy. This is some New World Order, not based on traditional Christian values. Sure, Biblical baloney is forced on everybody in our society by the power elite, but it has nothing to do with the New Testament, Jesus of Nazareth, or the Sacrifice of the Cross does it? There is not even a cross on that so-called chapel.

Reply to this | Report this

By Douglas Chalmers, November 8, 2007 at 11:21 pm #
(2932 comments total)

112500 by Mike on 11/08 at 9:41 pm: “...One’s god will always be a reflection of that one.  Hateful people embrace a hateful god, rejected by those with a more loving nature.  Of all the world’s gods the Christian god has always been the most hateful....”

So, I wonder where they actually did get that “god” from, Mike? He/It certainly never had anything to do with Jesus - except maybe for murdering him - which was carried out by the state and the church (the Romans with Israel’s connivance).

#112493 by Pat Williams on 11/08 at 9:04 pm + writeon + sulphurdunn, etc etc: “...What is even scarier about the illegal crosscountry transport of six nukes is the series of deadly “suicides” and “accidents” which have befallen personnel from both the air bases during the past two months....”

Were these “accidents/suicides” thus actually exterminations/liquidations and were they carried out on someone’s orders or by someone volunteering to be smart?

Reply to this | Report this

By Mike, November 8, 2007 at 9:41 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

One’s god will always be a reflection of that one.  Hateful people embrace a hateful god, rejected by those with a more loving nature.  Of all the world’s gods the Christian god has always been the most hateful. 

Is it any surprise then that Christian warriors kill indiscriminately, or torture others without conscience?

Reply to this | Report this

By Pat Williams, November 8, 2007 at 9:04 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

writeon- What is even scarier about the illegal crosscountry transport of six nukes is the series of deadly “suicides” and “accidents” which have befallen personnel from both the air bases during the past two months.

Reply to this | Report this

By rowman, November 8, 2007 at 8:48 pm #
(116 comments total)

Hmmm. So what you’re saying is that a member of the armed services should not be allowed to practice their faith. However, the source you cite at the beginning “Religious Toleration (Air Force Code of Ethics, 1997)” contradicts just that.

Christianity a cancer… that is just too absurd. How exactly could Christianity be bad? By its premise it is good.

Seems like the author has things all twisted up in his head and is seeking to do nothing more than attack a group of people for their faith.

Reply to this | Report this

By Rickinsf, November 8, 2007 at 7:44 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Seems appropriate to me.
The Air Force is possibly the most delusional of all the armed forces.

Reply to this | Report this

By Frank, November 8, 2007 at 7:37 pm #
(195 comments total)

How do you get armies of willing soldiers to fight future wars that violate international law, undermine the US Constitution, and have little to do with actual US national security interests?

Simple. Through aggresive evangelising at US service academies, you fill the ranks of the military branches with ‘christian warriors’, and then you frame all future conflicts in a religious context: Jesus vs. Mohammed, defend the Holy Land for the prophesied Second Coming, etc.  The evangelical/fundamentalist soldier’s allegiance to their religion will trump all other considerations.  It works great for Al Quaida, and it works for the Christian Right.

Reply to this | Report this

By Rob, November 8, 2007 at 7:27 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Do these cadets and their chaplains and superiors realize the ironic situation that the pilots that are being told that “Jesus is my co-pilot” will be fighting young men of the same age who will yell “Allah Akhbar!” in battle?

Why is it that it is the 21st century and human beings are still fighting for the affection and approval of an imaginary sky spirit?

Reply to this | Report this

By sulphurdunn, November 8, 2007 at 7:25 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

I have some uncomfortable suspicions about these people and the recent nukes gone missing incident that seems to have been white washed.

Reply to this | Report this

By jason, November 8, 2007 at 7:00 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

When I look at that picture I think of the Shrike from the Dan Simmons books.

Reply to this | Report this

By Hal Waters, November 8, 2007 at 6:19 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Imagine, these Air Force grads flying around loaded with H-bombs and they are expecting armageddon so they can be with their good ol’ boy version of Jesus.  Fundamentalist fanatics, it doesn’t matter what religion, are the worst enemy of civilization.

Reply to this | Report this

By mot, November 8, 2007 at 6:14 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Well, well, all you amergoofballs ; sharpen your knives for real, because in view of your tanking economy (a gift from your criminal elite govt.)you will soon be eating each other. Stay home, no other country wants you. It’s your fault. Get it?

Reply to this | Report this

By Douglas Chalmers, November 8, 2007 at 5:59 pm #
(2932 comments total)

#112417 by purplewolf on 11/08 at 2:17 pm: # 112290 Doug Chambers: “KISS- keep it simple stupid. These people are told over and over that they are Gods selected people....... Pathetic how religion reduces people down to the point of being savages. I even have a family member who gets as extremely irrational and violent as these brainwashed born agains....”

Thanks for your interesting response, purplewolf. By the way, Its Chalmers (Scottish), not “chambers”....

Having had family members who were either or both in the military or religiously obsessed, I can vouch for the fact that BOTH have a pervasive effect on everybody around them.

Of course, savagery is the prime quality which the military desires in its people - and primitive credulity is the province of orthodox religion. They are a dangerous combination.

The return of the crusades are already here. So too is Armageddon. We have been fortunate (but the Japanese weren’t!) that there hasn’t alrready been a nuclear war. Its been hanging over us since the 1950’s (Korea) and the 1960’s (Cuba).

But that IS what the USAF has in store for all of us - the militarist’s Armageddon. And, again of course, “armageddon” is a word of the Jews! The Earth will go on - possibly without the human race. Its insanity is not everlasting, uhh.

Reply to this | Report this

By RAE, November 8, 2007 at 5:40 pm #
(353 comments total)

Pathetic. Absolutely pathetic.

Whatever does “air force” and “education” have to do with individual religious beliefs or non-beliefs?

I’m missing something here. Where’s the benefit to either the student, the Air Force or the country?

When the “Reds” or the “Ruskies” invade, how is dropping to your knees to pray for help from heaven going to assist in defending the nation?

Beats me.

I do hope that there are at least some potential Air Force Academy students who, upon hearing the introductory comments by their superiors, IMMEDIATELY WITHDRAW THEIR APPLICATIONS AND RESIGN before they too become mentally disabled.

Reply to this | Report this

By P. T., November 8, 2007 at 4:44 pm #
(774 comments total)

I have seen that Air Force Academy church (in the picture) that is designed like a series of wings from military jets.  Let me tell you that it is vulgar.  They made a house of worship look like spare parts from jets used to drop cluster bombs on villagers.

Reply to this | Report this
Comment Pages: «1 2 3 4 5 »

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!