![]() |
![]() |
||
|
Moral MinorityPosted on Oct 24, 2007BOSTON—In retrospect, it was probably not the best way to reassure the faithful. When James Dobson, child psychologist turned political kingmaker, rose to speak at the Values Voter Summit dinner, he first complained about media reports that the religious right was dead. Then he cheerily announced, “Welcome to the morgue.” Yes, well, not yet. The much-reported news from last weekend’s gathering was that the honchos of the religious right are still wanted—dead or alive—by the Republican candidates. The candidates came, they saw, they pandered, though they didn’t exactly conquer. Romney flashed his family credentials so brightly you could hardly see his flip-flop footwear. Thompson promised his first hour in the Oval Office would be spent praying. Huckabee claimed, “You are my roots.” And even Giuliani offered the lame reassurance that “you have absolutely nothing to fear from me.” If the summit-goers did not meet in a morgue, they left in mourning for a candidate to call their own. But you don’t have to be a political pathologist to see the real message from the meeting. There are signs of ideological rigor mortis among the old guard. Think back to 2004, the “Year of the Values Voter.” The religious right claimed credit for Bush’s re-election and grabbed the word values the way it had grabbed the word life. Advertisement Anyone who considered war to be a moral issue was ignored. Anyone who wasn’t a member of the anti-abortion, anti-gay, fundamentalist right was, literally, devalued. Two years later, despair over the war and dismay about scandals had widened the morals agenda. And Democrats had narrowed the so-called God gap. But at the Family Research Council gathering, Dobson’s famous child-raising book, “Dare to Discipline,” must have been required reading. This was a gathering of emeriti from Eagle Forum’s Phyllis Schlafly to Virtue Gambler Bill Bennett to Spurned Justice Bob Bork. They were grooving to the oldies, from abortion to gay marriage. From the sound of the panels—“The Impact of the Homosexual Agenda”—and the look of the T-shirts—“Pet Your Dog, Not Your Date”—you would think that nothing was changing among social conservatives. But many conservatives are taking steps across old borders. Step One: The Environment. Never mind that Dobson once described global warming worries as a vast distraction from the great moral issues. For the past several years, evangelicals have sounded more like environmentalists. Last summer, five prominent religious leaders, including Richard Cizik of the National Association of Evangelicals, and five scientists, including James McCarthy of Harvard, toured Alaska together. As Cizik said, “We dare to imagine a world in which science and religion cooperate—minimizing our differences about how creation got started, to work together to reverse its degradation.” Step Two: Family. The “values voters” applauded the presidential veto against extending children’s health care. A pamphlet explaining where the candidates stand on “Issues that Matter Most to Your Family” listed exactly two issues: abortion and gay marriage. But on family matters, there are some unusual connections between former untouchables such as Roberta Combs, head of the Christian Coalition, and Joan Blades of both MoveOn.org and MomsRising. “At the end of the day, it’s all about family,” says Combs, who favors paid family medical leave, an idea that was once anathema to conservatives. Step Three: Liberty. At the summit, OB-GYN and congressman Ron Paul put forth his most strident anti-abortion views. But on questions about overreaching government from torture to surveillance, this maverick reads like a chapter from progressive Naomi Wolf’s dire book, “The End of America.” The right’s American Freedom Agenda and the left’s American Freedom Campaign sound as similar as their names in alarm over assaults on the Constitution. I’m not suggesting that social conservatives and liberals are going to be singing in the same choir or chorus. The left got a three-year head start on the search for common ground. Now some on the right are moving onto this terrain. This leaves the “values voters” leadership boogieing like they did in 2004, stuck on their elevated summit far above the madding crowd ... of voters. The only thing that seemed to rouse their pre-Halloween spirits was the specter of that wicked witch, Hillary Clinton. The big laugh line of the weekend? “We put our ‘Run, Hillary, Run’ bumper stickers on the front of our cars.” Come to think of it, this is starting to look like a cold case. Ellen Goodman’s e-mail address is ellengoodman(at)globe.com. © 2007, Washington Post Writers Group CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment |
We just got faster!
Our site is growing, and we’ve upgraded our servers to bring you a better, faster Truthdig experience.
We’re thrilled with our improvement — but it’s added a lot to our costs. Please help us to keep things snappy and make sure you have instant access to thousands of in-depth Truthdig articles, interviews, videos and cartoons.
Please chip in today with a gift to keep us moving forward. Then check out the site for yourself!
By cheryl, October 29, 2007 at 11:21 pm #
I think people need to keep in mind that God gave man the free will to choose or not to choose their own moral decisions regardless how you feel about any of thse personal issues. It is not anyones job to stop you from making that decision. God did not fix it so that certain people can be elevated above other humans. We are all equals, I dont recall god leaving anyone in charge of anyones life. I also know that throughout the history of christianity people have always try to shove it down your throat their own version of morality. The idea that we have those who want to be king in the name of christianity is absurd. We need to focus more on those who are here not those who may not get here. The focus should be more on social justice after all he was a revoulutionary social justice palestinian jew. Not a sexual moralist like some would like to make him out to be. I dont think any of these pro-lifers as being sincere. Ask them what would they do if their policy to make abortion illegal would cause the death of woman and they say nothing nor to they care. Please go to Chris hedges here at this website and read his article ” the greates threat to choice” and see what they are really all about. I dont think deceiving people is a christian virtue as you will se they have made it an art.
Report thisBy driving bear, October 29, 2007 at 4:45 pm #
reply to #110241 by cyrena on 10/29 at 7:40 am
First off I have family in Chicago and therefore I have seen lake Michigan, and its a really big lake , hence it’s place in the ranks of the Great lakes. Lake Michigan has trillion and trillions of gallons of water. So don’t worry about nestle using a few million gallons. What does nestle do with the water. It’s filters and bottles the water so humans don’t go thirsty. So are you pro thirst cyrena?
As for the native not being allowed to fish, who stops them? the christians don’t, but the environmentalist do.
As for slavery go back to school and take a US history class and you will discover that christian lead the call to end slavery.
As for still birth and miscarriages what is the biggest reason for this alcohol and drug use by pregnant women. even this is a small percentage of pregnancies. FYI about 1/3 of pregnancies end in abortions.
As for New Orleans , who was to blame for that ? the democrats and mayor ray “school bus” Nagen.
Mayor Nagen allowed school buses to be used to goto poor parts of the city to carry people to the polls on election day to vote for his sorry butt, but would not allow school buses to be used to take poor people out of the city before the storm. this show what the democrats true priorities are.
As for removing christian values for politics, so you think you or any one else has the right to decide which issues are on or off the political table , how Fascist of you.
Report thisBy driving bear, October 29, 2007 at 2:43 pm #
reply to #110198 by Paul_GA on 10/29 at 3:00 am
First off a bit of a history : Hitler’s Holocast resulted in the death of about 12 million people.
Since Roe v wade the abortion industry has killed 45-50 million children in the USA.
As for Hitler being anti abortion , Non aryans could be aborted at will. So Hitler was not pro life but a racist.
As for calling pro choice/death people Nazi’s ,as the old saying goes if the shoe fits wear it .
Report thisIf any thing the comparison to pro death democrats to the Nazi’s , would be an insult to the Nazi’s
and that is coming from me driving bear a Jew and proud of it.
By cyrena, October 29, 2007 at 11:40 am #
#110193 by driving bear
Christian conservatives trust God to control the weather aka the environment ,not Al Gore or you.
You dont get it DB. What does GOD have to do with Nestle Corp pumbing millions of gallons of water from Lake Michigan to sell to the rest of us? Water that the people of the region (specifically the NATIVE population) need to survive? Thats an environmental question, and a moral one. That same population has had its fishing privileges altered (consistently by the licensing bureaus) over and over and over again. How moral is that DB. How moral and Christian is it for Corporations to consistently poison various parts of the globe (and overwhelming here in the US) with the by products of their manufacturing;, causing cancer and all sorts of horrible diseases among various populations. Thats the environment, and thats a moral issue, even in backwoods Tennessee.
And, I think youve got some homework to do. So, start checking the statistics on miscarriages, (1st and 2nd trimesters) and still births in 3rd trimesters and at full term) Get those numbers. THEN, compare that with the number of abortions performed in the US. You might be surprised. I dont know where you get your 1 million babies figures, but youre going to need to explain to me why its moral to wait until their born, and then kill em (war, disease, starvation, etc) as opposed to allowing for abortions that are clearly none of your business.
So, just so were clear, Christian conservatives obviously dont have the slightest problem with babies dying, once theyre out of the womb. Its only the unborn that they seem to have this overwhelming concern for. If thats not the epitome of hypocrisy, I dont know what is.
Anyway, check those stats on miscarriages and stillbirths, primarily due to the lack of prenatal care, (which Christians dont seem to feel the least bit responsible) or lack of education in preteen or young mothers, (not responsible for that either right?) and see how that stacks up against abortion numbers.
Wait, I know what your answers gonna be. GOD controls that as well, right? So miscarriages and still births are fine, because GOD must be the greatest abortionist? Christians have no moral responsibility there, just like its always been perfectly moral for Christians to hold human beings in chattel bondage. IE SLAVERY? Yes, thats all very moral and God like. Surely God must have intended it that way.
And that ultra Christian organization of Blackwater, they dont mind killing lots of women and babies in Iraq either. Or, New Orleans. But, theyre so Christian. Help us figure out why God thinks thats perfectly fine. Or, maybe because those are non-White babies? Is that the difference? Ah. I thought so.
And, watch who you make accusations about not caring for poor people Mr. Christian. I dont think God would be all that happy with that either. I KNOW its not the mentality of the Jesus Christ that Ive read about.
This is why Christianity in the form of ignorant mentalities is so dangerous.
Matter of fact, what it always comes down to, at the end of the day for these “Christians” is the almighty dollar, and they don’t much care who or where it comes from, or who suffers as a result, as long as they have it.
Sorry, I know this is going to break your heart, but Religion doesn’t belong in politics. And the Christian Conservative type religion doesn’t belong anywhere.
Report thisBy Paul_GA, October 29, 2007 at 7:00 am #
With all due respect, Driving Bear, Adolf Hitler was anti-abortion as far as German (Aryan) women were concerned. In Nazi Germany, a first offense abortion was punishable by a stiff term of imprisonment; a second, by death.
I’m not too enthusiastic about abortion myself, but I do dislike pro-life people accusing pro-choice people of being “Nazi-like”.
Report thisBy driving bear, October 29, 2007 at 4:41 am #
reply to #110192 by cyrena on 10/28 at 11:41 pm
Christian conservatives trust God to control the weather aka the environment ,not Al Gore or you
Christians do care who marries who , Always have and always will and the numbers are on our side
I noticed you did not even try to refute the election data I supplied about gay marriage.
BECAUSE I WAS/ AM RIGHT
As for the abortion issue ,sorry I know it will break your Nazi heart but christian conservatives are not going to stand by while the pro death Nazi democrats KILL almost 1 million American Children per year.
So when compared to the Democrats on this issue ,BUSH is a Saint.
As for funding of so called social programs American now knows you and the democrats don’t give a dam about poor people , Your only goal is to expand the size of the government and to buy votes . FYI only 22 cents of every dollar spent on social welfare gets to poor people , the rest goes to government red tape and paper pushers.
Report thisBy cyrena, October 29, 2007 at 3:41 am #
#109663 by driving bear
If christian conservatives have lost their power why are both the Republican and democratic candidates trying to court the christian vote. Why are the dems trying to sell the environment their antiwar positions as moral issue. As for the true moral issues gay marriage and abortion the numbers are on the christian conservative side
DB,
Let me try to help answer your question. First, the Christian conservatives have lost their power because their hypocrisy has finally come to light. (took long enough). For a TRUE Christian, the environment is far more of a moral issue than gay marriage or abortion, because we ALL share the environment. No true Christian gives a rats ass about who marries who, or who has how many children.
The hypocrites among the political Christian Conservative Movement claim to be pro-life. Theyve highjacked that phrase as they have so many others, but people are finally realizing that they dont mean pro-life at all. One cannot claim to be in favor of life (as in the continued development of an embryo) and refuse to help feed/clothe/house/ or otherwise assist in providing for that same embryo, if it grows to full term, and can survive on its own, outside of its mothers womb. If they were so pro-life, theyd do something about the horrendous infant mortality rate in places like Mississippi and Alabama, were infant mortality rates are higher than many 3rd world countries.
If they were so pro-life they would be so gung ho to send our own troops off to kill (including children and babies) and to BE killed themselves. If they were really pro-life, they wouldnt want to have 16,000 SINGLE MOTHERS serving in Iraq and Afghanistan.
And, they cant really effectively explain why THEY care, if two people they dont even know, wanna marry each other. It has less than shit to do with them.
So, despite your numbers people are figuring this out, and they know the hypocrisy is very UN-Christian like. So, thats why theyre losing their power. THANK GOD!!
Jesus would NOT be pleased, and theyve chosen to name this movement after Him. Hypocrisy aint the way . thats what real Christians say. (at least the ones I know).
Hope that helps.
Report thisBy peter freer, October 29, 2007 at 1:42 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
The nation has had several great religious revivals, from pre-colonial times through the late 20th century. All of them have presaged progressive social change. I hope, I pray, we are on the cusp of that change now.
Report thisBy Scott, October 26, 2007 at 12:36 pm #
Anyone with a lick of sense knows that if Christ were alive today Republicans would be the first to nail him to a cross.
Report thisBy Grappa, October 26, 2007 at 12:18 pm #
I’ll just say this about those who are down on the progressives of these United States. I’ll let Christ be the judge of my indiscretions, not some Pius ,self serving hypoctite. Just remember the golden rule Christ taught his flock. What do you think Christ would say about the support of our corporations in purchasing cheap ,contaminated ,sweat shop items from China? Talk about values!man, there’s a hole host of evil there. I’m reminded of Christs reactions to the money changers in the market place.
Report thisBy driving bear, October 26, 2007 at 4:40 am #
If christian conservatives have lost their power why are both the Republican and democratic candidates trying to court the christian vote. Why are the dems trying to sell the environment their antiwar positions as moral issue. As for the true moral issues gay marriage and abortion the numbers are on the christian conservative side. Consider gay marriage in every state where the issue has been on the ballet, gay marriage lost every time. As for abortion last year Time magazine reported the most recent polling data on the issue and it showed that 85 % are in part pro-life. Specific 15 % support the current roe v wade rules , 15 % support at total ban ,and 70 % thing abortion should only be legal in cases of rape/incest or to save the life of the mother.
Face it the pro death pro gay satanist/Nazi’s are headed for the “ash heap ” of history.
Report thisBy sophrosyne, October 25, 2007 at 2:34 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
The Republican nominees are really a sad, hideous bunch. Their lies and ineptitude is shocking given the disasters of the past 7 years.
The “values” gang does not have the power it once did. Even true believers are figuring that Rove duped them and manipulated them.
Report thisBy mary, October 25, 2007 at 1:29 pm #
Believe it, this group could care less about anything but abortion and gay marriage. However, since most Americans aren’t exactly pro-abortion or pro gay anything, they aren’t anti anything either. I would like to know how many MEN are in the anti group.
Report thisThis is all about power, period. Keeping the power in the hands of rich, white men. Since their numbers are down, they are very concerned about women aborting those little white boy babies, or seeing those little white boy babies grow up to be gay. They’re very protective of “their” group. And since it appears most people are like sheep, what better way to get hang on to that power. A little bible thumping and ranting, these guys got them hooked like the sheep they are. I hope there is accountabiliy after life, just to see these guys get what they deserve in the end because I don’t see much questioning of their motives from this group of humans…....
By Paul_GA, October 25, 2007 at 12:51 pm #
I say, let this generation of vipers spend time wandering in the wilderness—-say, 40 years—-and may they be happy with their lot. I’m a Christian myself, but not an “evangelical”; I’m for Ron Paul.
Report thisBy cyrena, October 25, 2007 at 5:24 am #
#109432 by Outraged
I know you’re right Outraged, about sincere Christians. I guess I just don’t know that many sincere Christians. (Which is pretty sad, considering how many Christians I know.
Even the ones that I know, who aren’t in agreement with this obsession with abortion and gay rights, still don’t necessarily seem all that “sincere” to me. Seems that the bulk of them fall in the category of superstitious hocus pocus worshippers at best, and downright hypocrites at worst.
That’s not to say that I don’t know SOME sincere ones, but most of them fall into what I can only call the popular cult.
Still, sincere folks of ANY stripe, are likely to know that they’ve been had, and not like it one damn bit.
Meantime, I STILL will never understand how abortion ever came to be such a political issue. Or gay-marriage for that matter. I’ve tried my best to understand it, and I just can’t. Probably more the abortion issue than anything. Why does anybody care whether or not someone they don’t even know, and are not likely to ever meet, should choose to have an abortion?
I keep trying to find some logic to that argument, even if it’s twisted logic. Is is somehow supposed to be against the will of God? If so, have they ever considered the number of miscarriages and still births, that would make it appear the God is the ultimate abortionist? I mean, if that’s what it’s about, then how do so many pregancies terminate themselves? What about all of these infant mortality rates? Is that somehow different and alas…ACCEPTABLE?
These people scare me.
Report thisBy Outraged, October 25, 2007 at 1:42 am #
Looks like they forgot that sincere Christians are well, sincere, and that’s a good thing. They don’t like to be had. I personally don’t know a one of them who trusts the Republicans anymore, at all. They lied, cheated and stole. Sincere Christians do not take that lightly. I think most attended to put to rest any lingering doubt that there could be any truth in any of these candidates.
It’s too bad that some of these religious leaders aren’t candidates because then the truth about them would be revealed also. I don’t think sincere Christians would take that lightly. In fact, I know it.
Isaiah 57:4
Report thisWhom are you mocking? At whom do you sneer and stick out your tongue? Are you not a brood of rebels, the offspring of liars?