![]() ![]() |
![]() |
| |
|
Hold Politicians’ Feet to the FirePosted on Oct 23, 2007By Amy Goodman Fires rage through Southern California. Massive rainstorms drench New Orleans. The Southeast U.S., from Tennessee across the Carolinas and into Georgia, is in the midst of what could be the worst drought on record there. Atlanta could run out of water. While the press does an admirable job bringing us live images of extreme weather, it doesn’t explain why these events are happening. What links these crises? Global warming. Two words that have all too often been vacuumed off government Web sites and erased from government scientific studies. If the press isn’t making the connection, Bill McKibben is. In 1989, he wrote the book “The End of Nature,” one of the first books to describe global warming as an emerging environmental crisis. Now, almost 20 years later, he is leading a campaign to draft mass grass-roots participation to publicize the potential catastrophe of climate change and to demand federal action to “Step It Up.” The first Step It Up day of action, April 14, 2007, organized in local communities through a central Web site, saw 1,400 coordinated activities pulled together in just three months. The second day of action is planned for Nov. 3, organized through the Web site stepitup2007.org. “What’s important to remember and the reason that we spend all our time organizing now, trying to change all this, is that so far human beings have raised the temperature of the planet about one degree Fahrenheit,” says McKibben. “The computer modeling makes it very clear that before the century is out, unless we take very strong action, indeed, we’re going to raise the temperature of the planet another five degrees Fahrenheit. So, take whatever you see now, multiply it by five, and then toss in all those cascading effects that come, as we exceed one threshold after another.” The cascade effect is what is so important to understand. How could one degree Fahrenheit make such a big difference? One immediate, measurable impact of that seemingly slight temperature rise, according to University of Arizona scientist Tom Swetnam, is the increase in the frequency and duration of large wildfires in the U.S. West. Swetnam and his team have linked a warming, drying trend since the 1980s to the incidence of fires, like the more than a dozen that are raging out of control in Southern California. The predictions are not good. Trees take in carbon dioxide, the main greenhouse gas, releasing oxygen. In his August 2006 Science article, Swetnam reports that western U.S. forests remove 20 percent to 40 percent of the carbon dioxide in the U.S. As forests burn, McKibben notes, carbon is released into the atmosphere. Fewer trees then remain to take carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere, making warmer conditions, supporting more and longer fires, and so on, creating a positive feedback loop. A central warning of the scientific community is this: At some point, if Earth’s temperature rises much more, maybe three degrees, maybe six degrees, an irreversible feedback loop will overwhelm the planet’s climate, with cascading impacts leading to a warmer and warmer planet. Corporate America is feeling the heat. Carbon-emitting industries like the oil companies, chastened by the experience of Big Tobacco and asbestos, see that in the future they might be held accountable—especially since they are funding junk science and “Astroturf” (i.e., fake grass-roots groups) to cast doubt about the effects of global warming. Insurance companies can’t afford to ignore the consequences of global warming, as extreme weather causes billions of dollars in damage. McKibben and the Step It Up campaign lay out three basic demands: —Green jobs now, for all: 5 million green jobs conserving 20 percent of our energy by 2015. Green jobs are those created by transforming the economy from a coal- and oil-burning one to a sustainable economy built on a new set of energy sources, ensuring that the same people left behind by the last economy are not left behind again. —Cut carbon 80 percent by 2050: Freeze climate pollution levels now and cut at least 80 percent by 2050, and 30 percent by 2020. —No new coal: a moratorium on new coal-fired power plants. McKibben explains: “We need a movement as strong, as willing to sacrifice, as morally urgent, as passionate as the civil rights movement was a generation ago. If we don’t get it soon—and we have a real time limit here—if we don’t get it soon, then we’re not going to be able to force the changes that we need over the power of the very strong vested interests that would like to keep things the way they are, even though it’s now destabilizing the planet in the most powerful and most tragic ways.” People are taking action. On Monday, 60 people were arrested in Washington, D.C., as part of the No War, No Warming days of action, linking the war in Iraq, post-Katrina recovery and climate change, and demanding action from Congress, holding elected officials’ feet to the fire. Humans are causing global warming. For a short time, we have a chance to limit the damage. But time is running out. Step it up. Amy Goodman is the host of “Democracy Now!,” a daily international TV/radio news hour airing on 500 stations in North America. © 2007 Amy Goodman Distributed by King Features Syndicate Previous item: War Costs Spiral Out of Control Next item: Clinton Rejects 'Bush-Cheney Power Grab' Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.
Comment Pages:
1
»
By rodney, October 24, 2007 at 12:21 pm # Hey George Bush ,The Christan Right Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, Ann Colter, Bill O’ Racist, and all of the koolaid drinking moral morons that follow Bush and his policies. Maybe God is trying to tell us something
By Andrew A., October 24, 2007 at 6:45 am # Amy Goodman makes a good point but I’m always disappointed that it’s more about warming than just pollution. Whether or not humans contribute to rising temperatures is apparently debatable but everyone agrees that pollution destroys the health of people, animals, plants, and the rest of the planet. So concentrate on the risks and costs of polluting and appeal to the rational side of the the non-believers. Pollution costs money in the long term and all the richers should think twice about what really costs more. As a prime example, everyone always talks about the 14% growth rate of China and how good there market is and blah, blah, blah. But with the cost of the pollution they don’t take care of is incorporated into the equation it’s more like 7% (my numbers are approximate I read an article on yahoo a while back). So let’s be intellectually honest and put all the cards on the table for everyone to make a well informed decision about the future of our lifestyles.
By Paula, October 23, 2007 at 11:49 pm # It is not hard to figure out. It isn’t as complex as global warming. San Diego county gets 9-11 inches of rain in a good, wet year. There are nearly 3 million people living there. Do the math. That’s like 9 drops of water per person per year. The state and country let sprawl go unchecked and too many people are overwhelming the entire ecosystem. Remind me, please, why it is crazy to rebuild New Orleans as the Govenator is already yakking about federal aid and rebuilding these houses?
By GRANNY DORIS, October 23, 2007 at 7:57 pm # JEHOVAH, CREATOR, IS SPEAKING. HE HAS HIS WAY IN THE WHIRLWIND AND MAKES CLOUDS HIS CHARIOT. Add Your Comment |
COMMENT TOOLS:
Hide comments
Show comments
Comment on this article