![]() ![]() |
|
| |
|
Limbaugh’s ‘Phony Soldiers’ SlurPosted on Oct 3, 2007By Joe Conason The controversy over what Rush Limbaugh meant when he uttered the phrase “phony soldiers” last week isn’t just another broadcast sideshow. As the political power of conservatism declines, the symbolic authority of figures such as Limbaugh is likewise shrinking. That is why he backs away from his own words, rips them from context by selectively editing his program’s transcript, and insists he didn’t demean soldiers and veterans who dissent from the Bush White House war policy—as he and his fellow partisans have done so many times before. This revealing episode began on Sept. 26 during a conversation between Limbaugh and “Mike,” a caller who identified himself as an active-duty soldier and supporter of the Iraq war, who warned against the consequences of withdrawing U.S. troops “because Iraq itself would collapse and we’d have to go right back over there within a year or so.” At that point the host interjected, “There’s a lot more than that that they don’t understand. They can’t even—if—the next guy that calls here, I’m gonna ask him: Why should we pull—what is the imperative for pulling out? What’s in it for the United States to pull out? ... I don’t think they have an answer for that, other than, ‘Well, we just gotta bring the troops home. Save the—keep the troops safe,’ or whatever. It’s not possible, intellectually, to follow these people.” Replied Mike, “No, it’s not, and what’s really funny is, they never talk to real soldiers. They like to pull these soldiers that come up out of the blue and talk to the media.” Limbaugh agreed: “The phony soldiers.” Two days later, under heavy critical fire for using those words, he claimed to be the victim of a “smear.” He served up a neatly trimmed transcript of the Sept. 26 program, omitting more than a minute and a half to make it seem as if his “phony soldiers” reference was intended solely for an anti-war activist who had allegedly masqueraded as an Army vet. That falsified transcript has provided fodder for Limbaugh’s defenders, a motley assortment of bloggers, Fox News personalities, and a Republican congressman from Georgia who has actually introduced a resolution commending him. Not content with insulting the troops, the Limbaugh clones seem to think any soldier who examines the transcript will be too dumb to figure out how they have tampered with it. It is equally telling that both he and his defenders change the original phrase “phony soldiers” and say “phony soldier” instead—because the plural belies his alibi and emphasizes his nasty intention. While today he whines because Media Matters for America, the progressive watchdog group, caught and publicized his slur, he cannot escape what the audio proves. Only in a media environment where conservatives have long felt exempt from scrutiny would Limbaugh still feel free to mock the military service of those who disagree with him. He is, after all, a certified chicken hawk who cheered on the Vietnam War as it ground up tens of thousands of young Americans, but saw no reason why he should serve. His local draft board in a Missouri county, where his family enjoyed political influence, granted him a 1-Y deferment after he dropped out of college and forfeited his student deferment. Explaining how he escaped the draft, he has cited both a “bad knee” and a cyst on his backside that supposedly rendered him medically unfit. Despite that undistinguished record, however, he has never hesitated to denigrate the service of Sen. John Kerry, former Sen. Tom Daschle and other Democrats who volunteered to wear the nation’s uniform. He spent hours repeating the “Swift boat” lies when Kerry ran for president in 2004. And now he insinuates that the troops and vets who question this war are “phony soldiers.” What really worries Limbaugh and his right-wing comrades is that more and more of those who bravely serve America abroad, from foot soldiers to flag officers, have begun to voice their anger at the reckless policies that have cost them so dearly. Leaders of VoteVets, a group of Iraq and Afghanistan veterans organized in support of smarter security policy, have angrily challenged Limbaugh to repeat his slur to their faces—something he is most unlikely to do. Thanks to all the veterans with the courage to speak out—no matter what their opinion—it is no longer so easy for the Limbaugh crowd to claim the military and the flag as their exclusive property. That illegitimate seizure of everyone’s patriotic heritage is coming to an ignominious end. Joe Conason writes for the New York Observer (www.observer.com). © 2007 Creators Syndicate Inc. Previous item: Justice Is Blinded by Rage Next item: Breaking the Taboo: Why We Took On the Israel Lobby Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.
By xyzaffair, October 22, 2007 at 6:46 am # It’s easy for Rush Limbaugh to sit back in criticize soldiers who have been in combat since he’s obviously 4F - fat, fake, fraudulent, and flatulent.
By John Hanks, October 8, 2007 at 4:47 pm # I wish some genius would right a history of military corruption. A general in Paris had a huge black market operation that was so big that it prevented Patton’s Third Army advance at a crucial time. Vietnam was a huge profiteering enterprise with no other real purpose. Even McNamera admitted it. The gulf wars speak for themselves. I often wonder whether or not my whole anti-submarine enterprise wasn’t a huge graft mill for Lockheed aircraft. No other countries seemed to take as much trouble hunting submarines, when any one of them could destroy much of the Eastern seaboard.
By Conservative Yankee, October 8, 2007 at 1:58 pm # #105483 by John Hanks on 10/08 at 5:46 am “No one loves graft and corruption like a soldier loves graft and corruption.” Maybe But Maybe No one loves graft and corruption like the people who profit from graft and corruption.... At the Honorable soldier’s expense. When Dad returned from WW II after five years of uncomplaining service, including graves registration duty at Normandy, he began his career five years later than my uncle who stayed behind and worked the wall Street defense boom. They joked about it all the time. My uncle loaned my father the money to buy his first house, my father took in my cousins when my uncle died of a heart attack (Dad said too much wall street, not enough exercise.) When my cousin returned from Vietnam, after 18 months of service he sat around, drank, and complained about how “the system had used him. My father died a happy,wealthy man with his family all at his bedside. my cousin is still a drunk! In two hundred and 32 years this country has never been to war without a Snyder. Soldiers are OK when we need them.... It’s just we don’t need them as often as we have used them.
By Can of Whoop Ass, October 8, 2007 at 7:32 am # Ignoring Duff Limpball, mAnn Coulter, Sean Insannity and Bill O’Pervert isn’t going to make them go away.
By John Hanks, October 8, 2007 at 5:46 am # Franks is a liar. No one loves graft and corruption like a soldier loves graft and corruption. And, those who have the misfortune to have honor, will always put it aside to cover for those who have none.
By Conservative Yankee, October 8, 2007 at 5:18 am # “No one hates war like a soldier hates war.” General Tommy Franks
By truthbees, October 7, 2007 at 8:50 pm # The fakeriots are always for war but never can muster up the courage to go. The fakeriots are for funding the war, but “not on my nickel!” The fakeriots love war so much because their investments in armaments and oil gain them big profits. That their fellow countrymen and women go to their war without proper body armor and equipment, well—it is simply not their problem! That their fellow countrymen and women never return or return half-dead/half-alive, well—that’s simply the name of the game with war! What are the fakeriots? They are the guys and gals dressed in their Armani suits with little flag pins trumpeting on their left lapels, “See me, I’m a patriot. See my flag pin?” Easy...so, easy. Never having been on a battlefield, not even close to one, they shout about patriotism while denigrading those who ask questions about the motives for having gone to war and insult those who are greatly distressed by the individual tragedies of the soldiers, their families, the Iraqi citizins, and the shame this great nation has suffered because the fakeriots, not having any sense of history, ethics, or community, are deluded, thinking they are serving their country by making big profits from their investments. Shame on them all!
By Can of Whoop Ass, October 7, 2007 at 1:18 pm # Rush Limbaugh Defended by Arnold Schwarzenegger-
By Dale Headley, October 7, 2007 at 10:53 am # Doesn’t Joe Conason realize that Rush Limbaugh is “98.8% accurate” in all he says? It makes one wonder how Rush manages to squeeze so many blatant lies out of that other skimpy .02%.
By Can of Whoop Ass, October 7, 2007 at 9:22 am # I knew Kerry would lose in August of ‘04 when he didn’t confront the thugs on the right about his “purple-heart, paper cut band-aids”. If Democrats are going to win in ‘08 they must attack. They must get in the mud with the rightist pigs and get dirty.
By Buckwheat, October 7, 2007 at 5:12 am # Let them continue to drop turds into the Republican punch bowl. The hubris which they evidence will eventually bring them down. They are intellectually lazy and when challenged, try to go “deep”, quoting some historical esoterica which demonstrates how very out of their depth they really are. They are entertainment.
By John Hanks, October 6, 2007 at 3:54 pm # Right-wing Rush supporters are not moral actors. They will use any means at their disposal to maintain their political position in this country. They are basically at war. That is why it is futile to make moral appeals to conscience with these people. They are total moral and intellectual cowards like the KKK.
By msgmi, October 6, 2007 at 2:59 pm # Where’s the outrage from the Rush listeners about Doughboy Rush, a Vietnam deferment-begging chicken, who has evolved into a media-king chickenhawk? Rush is part of the elite cluster f… which is adored by the policymakers from the White House to the Rushies in the outhouse, and whose rhetoric fuels disinformation in support of the far right neo-CON pipedreams. His media platform serves the political armada of fear propagandists. The traditional conservatism of the republican party died with Ike, and since then, Rush et al has become the voice of a morally bankrupt posse of media moguls.
By Mossad, October 6, 2007 at 6:36 am # Rush is a Fat Pig of a Douche Bag. You can see him in archive news reels in a sheriff’s outfit “Leaning On” civil rights protestors in Alabama during the 50’s and 60’s. Please tell Hannibal Lecter where this Pork Pie of a Fat Ass lives.
By NYT 9237723, October 5, 2007 at 12:52 pm # Dee, you’re. Rush was referring to service people who oppose the war, and not to some bunch of chicken hawks (like himself). No one should be criticized for opposing any war, even a just war. Critics remind us that war should be the absolute last resort, started only when no other remedy is possible, rather than the first. Anyone who has served knows that it truly is hell, for soldiers, their families, the enemy civilians and combatants. Our men and women in Iraq (those in uniform) have sacrificed time and effort, some now have broken families, and all will have health problems from the depleted uranium and other toxic substances. Dee, Rush is once again fat, sassy and comfortably out of harm’s way. Let him shut up.
By Michael, October 5, 2007 at 7:07 am # Certainly Rush’s “phony soldiers” remark was a reference to Bush, Cheney and himself, no?!
By Inherit The Wind, October 4, 2007 at 7:44 pm # So Rush Limbaugh put his foot in his big mouth and lied about it afterward. What makes this news? Like he hasn’t done it before?
By CharlesDoan, October 4, 2007 at 5:18 pm # I say this to Rush: The mind is a terrible thing to waste, in this case, Rush is a waste that is a terrible thing to mind.
By truth machine, October 4, 2007 at 3:37 pm # “If people like you and Al Franken and Keith Olbermann would stop advertising the moron, his only possible popularity would come from people YOU CAN’T REACH in a thousand years, stupid, dull, bigoted, fools from the right wing lunatic fringe.” That’s silly—nothing Conason, Franken, or Olbermann has said about Limbaugh made him more popular. “Alan Greenspan, are agreed that our Iraq adventure is about oil” Not really; you should listen to his interview on Democracy Now! Greenspan’s claim is that Hussein wanted to control the straits of Hormuz—that it was all about oil for *Hussein*—and that’s why Greenspan thought him a threat. But that’s absurd. Greenspan also said he believes Hussein had WMDs and was surprised when they weren’t found.
By John Hanks, October 4, 2007 at 3:14 pm # You’ve got it wrong Dee. And, I think you are willfully spreading false info. I heard the quote too, and it clearly referred to soldiers who hated the Iraq policy. The so-called false testimony soldiers are elsewhere on the transcript. It’s time to quit with the lies. We check on everything that right wingers say.
By Dee, October 4, 2007 at 2:23 pm # I heard Rush’s call to “Mike” and heard the comments thereafter, and have since heard all the rhetoric concerning it. He was not talking about soldiers who had fought in the Iraq war. He was talking about men who say they were soldiers and have fought and recieved metals who have not. He was speaking of men who lie about their service. He had just finshed talking about this Jessie McBeth guy and how he lasted 44 days in the military and then went out and made up stories about how the soldiers were haninging people in the street and committing atrocities. It was all lies. He had dicussed 8 men who had been arrested for doing the same thing to get VA benefits. Why arent the soldiers against the war angry about men like this? Rush was not talking about these soldiers who are against the war and certainly not talking about this soldier who now has a television ad against Rush. How many of you who are outraged actually listened to his program that day and not some sound bite or pieced together script of the program? Dont call me names and say Im some right-wing Rush-head to try and discredit my comments. The fact is Sen. Harry Ried got it all wrong and got all head-up about something he knew nothing about. How many of you who critize Rush’s program listen to it? How many of you get your information about what he says from some blog or liberal website? Until you can say that you are a listener and that you heard the actual words he uttered then you have no right to make a fuss over something that was “supposedly” said.
By Jose A. "Andy" Chacon, October 4, 2007 at 1:02 pm # Flush Rush!!!!!
By John Hanks, October 4, 2007 at 11:04 am # When I was in the Navy, we used to refer to an exemplary sailor as a “real” sailor. We looked on them much like one would look at a dog walking on his hind legs.
By alice, October 4, 2007 at 9:57 am # Rush is an entertainer looking for manufactured controversy and ratings. He has cashed in on all of this. Fox news is the same way. Fox, like Rush, is contentless but as long as cooked up controversy can be manufactured, they get paid. Ignore the morons.
By AlexH, October 4, 2007 at 8:06 am # It’s a pity Alan didn’t speak up when he was still fed chairman
By Alejandro, October 4, 2007 at 5:54 am # Nothing further need be said.
By Thomas Billis, October 4, 2007 at 4:37 am # I used to think that attacking the lunatic right wing fringe like Limbaugh and Coulter was a huge waste of time and took time away from serious discussions of relevant issues.I was wrong these moronic issues are what people vote on.The attack on Cleland and Kerry.The call me Harold advertisement in Tennessee.I would like to think that my fellow citizens were bright enough to see what bullshit this stuff is but alas I was wrong and if the democrats are to win this is a necessary exercise.The great Joe Connasson instead of focusing on something relevant like I do not know maybe getting out of Iraq has a column on the right wing buffoon.Things have not really changed since Willie Horton.The democrats through necessity have learned to play this moronic game.Do you wonder how we could end up with a moron as President? Add Your Comment |
COMMENT TOOLS:
Hide comments
Show comments
Comment on this article