  |
 |
| |
|
|
|
 The Silent MajorityPosted on Oct 2, 2007By Marie Cocco WASHINGTON—Voters put Democrats in control of both houses of Congress last fall and, for this act of civic determination, they face an infuriating conundrum. Republicans are still running things. The same folks who brought you the Iraq war, the refusal to act on the health insurance crisis, the fiscal meltdown that leaves crucial government functions underfunded while managing to drive up the national debt are still bringing you: the Iraq war, the refusal to act on health insurance and a looming showdown over spending priorities that leaves the fiscal meltdown unaddressed. After the “thumpin’ ” President Bush says his party suffered in the midterm elections, a few things were supposed to happen. The White House was supposed to adapt to the new political terrain, negotiating with the opposition on most matters—especially rudimentary legislation such as annual spending bills—and only draw strategic lines-in-the-sand with selective vetoes that involve a president’s core principles. This is what most contemporary presidents who confront a Congress dominated by the opposition party have done. Bush hasn’t. Republicans in Congress—especially in the House—were supposed to learn from their mistakes and stop backing themselves into ideological corners that are way outside of mainstream thinking. They didn’t. Instead, Bush and a solid core of Republican lawmakers (albeit a shrinking one) are managing to get their way on serious issues of the day, whether it be the conduct of the Iraq war or health insurance for low-income kids who currently do without it. The veto fight over the terms for renewing the State Children’s Health Insurance Program—a wildly popular program that has had bipartisan support since its inception a decade ago—is to be played out this week. Democrats in the House lack the votes to override Bush’s expected veto, though the Senate passed the measure with plenty of votes to spare. None of this can be understood unless you look in the right place for the answers. That’s not in a civics book. It’s in the all-too-familiar television graphic we see during election coverage, the one that colors Democratic regions blue and Republican strongholds red. The Democratic gains in the 2006 congressional elections means there are fewer Republican moderates—they were thrown out of office, particularly in the Northeast and Midwest, making those regions bluer. This makes it nearly impossible to cobble together a bloc of swing Republican moderates needed, say, to override a presidential veto of an enormously popular bill to provide health care to kids. Looked at another way, about half of the 159 votes in the House against the popular children’s health measure came from lawmakers in the South—the reddest of red states. They’re with the president when he says this program—run by the states, with care administered through private managed-care insurance companies and delivered by private doctors and nurses—is really socialized medicine. The few Republicans who joined Democrats in passing the House legislation are in the dwindling handful of districts that could swing either way. Case in point: Vern Buchanan, the Florida Republican who won Katherine Harris’ seat by 369 votes—and with a contested result because of machine malfunctions that appear to have lost about 18,000 votes—cast his vote with the Democrats. So did Virginia lawmakers Tom Davis and Frank Wolf, who broke with most of their delegation because they represent districts in suburban Washington that are growing ethnically diverse, and voting more Democratic. Davis, meanwhile, intends to run for Senate next year—and Virginia in statewide elections has lately been a killing ground for Republican candidates. So even as the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee hammers at the kids insurance issue with radio advertisements and robo calls, there’s not much chance of turning around enough Republican votes to override Bush’s health-insurance veto. There are only about two dozen Republicans on the group’s target list, and they are in regions such as the Southwest and Midwest, where the Democrats are tilling ground for the 2008 elections. “We’d prefer to get these kids the health care they need,” says Jennifer Crider, a DCCC spokeswoman.
With that more noble goal out of reach, the only other option is what voters find distasteful—turning a common-sense issue, such as getting health insurance to poor kids, into a political cudgel.
SHARE THIS TRUTHDIG ARTICLE:
|
|
Confronting the Terrorist Within
Email
Print
Share
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Fark
Furl
Ma.gnolia
Mixx
MySpace
NewsVine
NewsTrust
Reddit
SphereIt
StumbleUpon
TwitThis
YahooBuzz
Jump to Comments
By Dieter Heymann, October 4, 2007 at 1:13 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
It is imperative that a Constitutional Convention is established soon to:
1. do away with the Electoral College and elect Presidents by the majority of a national popular vote and
2. do away with the Senate.
Both institutions were adopted to control the “rabble” , which the Founding Fathers feared and distrusted. They still exist because politicians fear today’s “rabble”.
Report thisBy driving bear, October 4, 2007 at 12:51 pm #
To #104673 by PACRAT on 10/04 at 10:56 am
I hate to break it you but the democrats in congress in many ways are WORSE than Bush. In Jan 09 bush will be out of office. However the democratic senators elected in 06 who betrayed the voters by running on an anti war platform and upon getting to DC voting to keep the war going will be in til Jan 2013. Why do you think that HRC said US forces would be in Iraq until 2014.
If you want impeachment I suggest impeachment of congress persons who lied to the voters in 06.
Report thisBy PACRAT, October 4, 2007 at 10:56 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Democrats are willing to permit more military deaths just so that they have a campaign issue for 2008!
Why else are they derelict in their duty to get our troops started out of Iraq? YES, IT IS THEIR DUTY!
So is impeachment! Impeachment is not an act of retaliation, it is the duty of Congress to protect the Constitution and our country.
Did these wimps ever read the constitution or remember their oaths?
Report thisBy Mudwollow, October 4, 2007 at 10:06 am #
Why rail against the Democrats and leave the Republicans alone?
If you are playing some sport with two partners on each team and your partner keeps dropping the ball and actually making points for the opposing side, who do you get mad at?
Report thisBy BruSays, October 4, 2007 at 9:12 am #
Thanks Cyrena...appreciate the support.
Mission Accomplished!
Report thisBy John Borowski, October 4, 2007 at 4:04 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
It amuses me to hear comments that propose the use of weapons such as voting, impeachment, and investigation. In a dictatorship these weapons are as useless as a Democrat majority. I believe we have a covert dictatorship in this country right now. We will have an overt dictatorship when the next 9/11 happens. The only difference in the next 9/11 is it will be a hundred times worst than the first one. I personally believe it will not be perpetrated by the killem for god, although they will be blamed.
Report thisBy cyrena, October 4, 2007 at 12:37 am #
#104406 by BruSays
BurSays,
This is a keeper!! How did you do this is such few words? I’m practicing.
Thanks. I can share this with all of my colleagues who can’t stay awake to read all of those long pages. Why should they? This says it ALL.
Report thisBy Jonas South, October 3, 2007 at 4:45 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Frustration with the Democrats in Congress is widespread among progressive and independent voters. But this article shows that voting Democratic is not enough: we must nominate the right candidate for every race, starting with the presidency, and the seats of the leaders in the House (Pelosi) and the Senate (Reid).
Report thisBy BruSays, October 3, 2007 at 11:08 am #
Little will change until Democrats learn some lessons from Republicans:
1. Make the Message Mindless - but simple. One-liners, sound bites, and catch words work, even when they’re lies: Kerry hates the troops. Bush supports the troops. Tax & Spend Democrats, etc… Americans’ attention span is no longer than this sentence, so keep the message short.
2. Feed the Fear. Nothing builds support like fear. Create an enemy. Hype the fear. Play yourself up as the savior, the protector.
3. Push Patriotism. The Patriotism Button needs to be pushed at every possible chance. Recall the terror of 9/11. Then call opponents to your agenda as “America-haters,” or “soft on terrorism.” Works every time.
4. Define the Dialog. If a tough question is asked ("where ARE the WMDs?"), change your position to “It was never about the WMDs” and then quickly offer up “It’s always been about freedom and democracy.”
So how about it, Democrats?
Report thisBy John Borowski, October 3, 2007 at 10:23 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Before the year 1980, we had Republicans (Aka Conservative right wingers) that represented the average Americans interests 10 percent of the time. They represented the obscene riches interest ninety percent of the time. There is an inverse relationship between the average American and the obscene rich. If the benefits favor the average American, it is to the detriment of the obscene rich or vice versa. I know the average J.Q Public cant give Einstein a run for his money, but it is hard for me to believe that forty-nine percent of the average American group would vote for the Republicans (Aka Conservative right-wingers). The only way Republicans (Aka Conservative right-wingers) could get forty-nine percent of the average Americans votes would be to rig the elections. In the period between 1980 and 2000, the extreme right kicked out the decent Republicans using fear, intimidation, and money. As a consequence, this is not the Republican Party your father and grandfather voted for. This is an extreme Fascist group that under the smoke screen of saving your ass from the killem for god folks, they are killing your Constitution, Bill of Rights, Quality of life, and living standards. Even if I was a member of the obscene rich (I havent won the lottery yet) I would vote Democratic because the Republicans (Aka Conservative right-wingers) are leading us down the road to nihilism and they tell me you cant take it with you.
Report thisBy GW=MCHammered, October 3, 2007 at 8:34 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
DEMS and GOP are the same party. They’re joined at the lobbyist-pocket. Our government is beyond narcissistic, in love with itself. Our government is DRUNK in love with itself.
Vote out the GOP now and vote in another party. If that doesn’t motivate the DEMS to do the peoples’ work then they can go too. Save American Democracy by practicing Democracy. End this wholesale slaughter of our principles and economy that only empowers communist and other abusive governments. Because THAT is NOT Democracy.
Report thisBy David Macaray, October 3, 2007 at 5:56 am #
You’re partly right: the Democrats do have a razor-thin majority in congress. But you are wrong to say they “control” congress. According to the dictionary, control implies that you have command over something, that you have the power to make something do/behave as you wish . . . neither of which, clearly, the Democrats now have. They have the slimmest majority possible, and are proving it.
When we take the White House in ‘08, along with 30-40 more seats in congress, then we’ll see if you’re right about dereliction of duty. But let’s not forget: under Jimmy Carter, we had the White House, the House of Representatives and the Senate. Did we “fix” the country? Hardly.
Report thisBy Conservative Yankee, October 3, 2007 at 4:38 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
104225 by driving bear on 10/02 at 8:06 pm
“Webb in VA won by only 0.3%”
NO, he won by . 4% running against Incumbent George Allen. Campaigns against incumbents have always been an uphill battles, and rarely successful.
BUT the Webb win is nothing for non-partisans to crow about. Webb was a Reagan Republican who changed parties for political expediency, NOT ideology.
“In MT the dem candidate won by only 0.6 %”
No, it was actually .9% and it was against an incumbent, with far more money, and greater name recognition (obviously)
Tester is a “conservative” farmer, and a workingman rather than a career politician. He was also a school teacher, and a music major which makes him a target, hard to hit.
My personal belief is he is one of the best things that has happened to politics in years… I’ll be watching him closely.
“Also after the 06 election a poll found that 85 % of American were satisfied with the GOP performance on other issues.”
This is an out and out falsehood. Congress (both D & R have the worst approval rating in US history of polling. Their numbers (sometimes reported in single digits) are lower than those of Bush. Republicans, polled on the approval ratings of their OWN party were able to muster just a slim majority. (53%)
I’ve got some news for you DB, 85% of U.S. citizens are not satisfied with the handling of any political issues. This regardless of party.
Report thisBy Dr. Knowitall, PhD, PhD, October 3, 2007 at 4:17 am #
#104012 Tom, my Dad harped on your sentiment half a century ago; he was about 50 then and everyone he said that to argued that he was dead wrong. He’s dead now, but wasn’t wrong then and you’re not wrong now. Since 1950, in spite of the efforts of hard-working people, things have gone steadily downhill in America because there hasn’t been a clear choice for change. Politicians concern themselves with themselves and have conditioned and manipulated the electorate into doing the same. Now, no one cares about the next generation. Don’t have babies.
Report thisBy driving bear, October 2, 2007 at 8:06 pm #
I think what everyone is overlooking is the fact that the Dem’s just barely came to power in 06. For example in the senate 2 of the seats the dems pick up were MT and VA. In MT the dem candidate won by only 0.6 % and Webb in VA won by only 0.3% and that with the antiwar boost. Also after the 06 election a poll found that 85 % of American were satisfied with the GOP performance on other issues.
Report thisThe dems looked at these facts and decided not to rock the boat
By cyrena, October 2, 2007 at 5:18 pm #
#104103 by Hank
The Democrats have had plenty of opportunities to fight the conservatives in the Congress, but they caved in every time. Just because they cannot get enough votes to overide a Bush veto does not mean they have to pass legislation they do not like. They do not have to fund the war. They do not have to fund other programs they do not like.
Thanks Hank, here it is. They didnt have to stay after school to pass the illegal spying operation legislation either, but they did. The could and should JUST BE SAYING NO!!
#104074 by sharon ash
We have major problems in our country because the overwhelming majority of Americans have been unwilling to be involved in knowing what goes on in our government and speaking up. And that shoe, I suspect, fits many currently griping, here on this site. While most Americans slept, the greedy have been having a feast and accumulating vast treasures of wealth.
Thank YOU Sharon, for this even more important observation!!!
While we all (me included) bitch among ourselves, we continue to allow the facists to run things (and us) into mass graves, and the average American still doesnt get that the graveyard is expanding to include THEM. And, when they finally see that it IS growing closer to their own neck-of-the woods, they blame everything imaginable, EXCEPT themselves, or their failure to act, or even at least be aware.
Rather, too many Americans have allowed themselves to be dumbed-down and banished to Never-Never Land, singing as they go, and telling themselves thats just the way God intended things to be.
Please see Michael Moore’s SicKo. It’s assigned homework for all Americans.
Report thisBy Trigger finger, October 2, 2007 at 12:29 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
It was a HUGE mistake voting democrats into power. Minnesota’s kobuchar is really a republican at heart and votes with the republicans on major issues. She is a huge disappointment and her career will be 1 term short, I hope.
The only thing any of them care about is their own ass and the hell with the United States of America. Shame on them all.
Report thisBy Conservative Yankee, October 2, 2007 at 11:41 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
WASHINGTONVoters put Democrats in control of both houses of Congress last fall and, for this act of civic determination, they face an infuriating conundrum. Republicans are still running things.
Voters did NOT put Democrats in control of both houses.
Currently, there are 49 Democrats and 49 Republicans. Joe Lieberman (I Conn.) votes with the Democratic party when the issue is not connected to the Iraq war. He ran for Senate in Connecticut on a PRO-war stance, and he won! Bernie Sanders is the other independent (from Vermont) he generally votes with the Dems. That puts any vote on Iraq at 50/50. The Vice President breaks a tie.
The argument has been made that Republicans do not vote as a block anymore. I’ll wait and see, BUT even if they do not, that’s not Never has been, Democratic control.
Does anyone deal in reality anymore?
Report thisBy Hank, October 2, 2007 at 11:40 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
The Democrats have had plenty of opportunities to fight the conservatives in the Congress, but they caved in every time. Just because they cannot get enough votes to overide a Bush veto does not mean they have to pass legislation they do not like. They do not have to fund the war. They do not have to fund other programs they do not like.
Report thisNo, the real problem is that too many Democrats are no different than the Republicans--they are all paid by the same lobbies. we do not have a two-party system.
By Gerard, October 2, 2007 at 10:56 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
I understand the Dems don’t have the votes to actually de-fund the war or call for troop removal. There’s one way I think they can “end the war” wihtout looking like they don’t “support the troops”.
It’s a simple fact that the military alone can not handle the task of keeping peace in Iraq, the use of contractors for logistical positions is wide-spread and well known. What is also at least somewhat known is the obscene amount of money these contractors earn for doing these logistical tasks.
The Dems should create a bill that places a hard limit on the amount of money a contractor can charge for performing a task in a war/combat zone. I’d suggest that the number be relative to the pay of the soldiers who would otherwise be doing this job.
To pull numbers out of thin air, lets say a military water purification specialist is paid $2000 per month, a contractor should not be allowed to charge more than $4000 per month for doing this job. My understanding is that we are currently paying contractors tens of thousands of dollars per month to do this sort of thing. The bill should also prohibit the artificial inflation of military pay grades, requiring that if a pay grade is being used as a basis for scaling, then at leat 75% of the personnel performing that job just be military.
To explain that last point more, it could otherwise be possible to abuse the system by increasing the pay grade of a military water purification specialist to some obscene number like $9000 per month, then paying the contractor twice that. This clause will state that unless a super majority of soldiers are performing this job at that pay grade, then contractors can not get their 2x of this pay grade.
This bill has several selling points: it prohibits the “cost plus” contracts that are so obscenely wasteful, it ends the cronyism that is rampant in the current scenario, it severely limits the desire of people to run in to a war zone to do a job for lots of money that the weren’t willing to do for patriotism or humanitarian reasons.
The end effect I think will be that the contractors will pull us stakes and move on when they can’t make as much money. With the contractors out of the picture the military will be required to fulfill the positions again. Of course, they can’t. The strain will cause the military leaders to re-evaluate the situation and decide one of severl things:
that they need more troops, and most likely a draft to get them
they need to start pulling out of the region
they need to severely altering their mission to put more troops back in to logistic/support roles and scaling back combat/policing actions
It also says the if the military is going to go to war, the MILITARY needs to go to war, not private companies.
Report thisBy sharon ash, October 2, 2007 at 10:22 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
We have major problems in our country because the overwhelming majority of Americans have been unwilling to be involved in knowing what goes on in our government and speaking up. And that shoe, I suspect, fits many currently griping, here on this site. While most Americans slept, the greedy have been having a feast and accumulating vast treasures of wealth. This feast will not be easy to stop. Both parties have their greed monsters, however, the Republican Party pretty much dominates. Romney was recently in my city at an invitation only meeting with our local Republican Mafia and it looked like a Klux Klan meeting as those attending were trying to duck cameras in the hallways leading to the meeting. The biggest battle we face is not the terrorists, but some of our own citizens who either purposefully or unwittingly have abandonded the concept of democracy for a dictatorship form of government.
Report thisBy purplewolf, October 2, 2007 at 9:33 am #
When the dimmos retook power? last November the as-h-le in the white house again lied when he said he would work with the dimmos. HAH! This child medical bill would cost 35 billion dollars for the next 5 years or 7 billion dollars a year.Bush spends just in Iraq 4 billion dollars a week. After figuring it,it would take away 12.25 days out of 365.25 days of the year of Bush’s war spending in just Iraq to pay for a whole years worth of medical coverage.That still leaves him 353 days of funded Iraq war money,and I am certain he could still get by killing people and destroying the world just fine with those few days worth of money put into a better purpose. The fact that he would deny less than 12 and a half days worth of war money to something more constuctive speaks volumns of his Christian values that him and his fanatics try to force on the world. With this latest veto threat it just proves Bush is an uncaring, greedy, warmongering bully who cares nothing about human life-unless it is unborn, once it’s here his attitude is to hell with it.Jesus should be so proud, Bush is doing his fathers work.
Report thisBy don knutsen, October 2, 2007 at 9:05 am #
re Mudwallow’s comment below.
I agree that the democrats in Congress rightly deserve blame for voting for this war, well all except a very few anyway. I totally agree that N. Pelosi and H. Reid should be replaced with individuals who have the political will / courage to do whats right and begin the removal and hopefully indictment of Cheney and his sock-puppet. But nowhere in your comment did I see you blaming the GOP that from ‘94 untill last November were in control and rubberstamped every decision that came out of the corporate office called the white house. In your disdain for the milk-toast democrats ( a label they deserve ) you left out the party that has enabled these criminals and still does. They have refused any kind of oversite, threatened by the snear of Cheney and his hit man Addington all this time. Its only because the democrats have gained a slim majority that therre is any oversite at all beginning to take place. I agree our goverment is broken, but the lion’s share of blame for who broke it, who spent so much of our nations revenue signing onto Bu$h’s tax cuts for the wealthy which had a hand in turnng the surplus bu$h was handed into the roaring deficit we now have belongs in the lap of the republican party.
Report thisBy royf, October 2, 2007 at 8:36 am #
Thank you, gronomox, for saying what I’ve been thinking for these past 7 years. The Confederacy wouldn’t survive long as a separate country. How could it be a functional country when most of its population is either profoundly ignorant or stark raving mad, or both? (I just traveled through the rural south this summer, and it was even more frightening than I expected.) It’s obvious that this 142-year experiment at reforming them since the Civil War has failed.
Just make sure the Union keeps all the nuclear weapons, and none fall into the hands of that dangerous Third World rogue country.
Report thisBy Mudwollow, October 2, 2007 at 7:54 am #
Marie Cocco exposes the real reason the Bush neocons are able to lead America around by the nose. It’s pantywaist liberal excuse makers like Marie Cocco.
Oh my goodness, they were supposed to have acted differently! I’ll wring my hands now and politely analyze the situation until everyone’s nodded off.
The Democrats got us into this war just as much as Republicans. And Democrats have continued and funded this undeclared war by hurling the American economy into historically record debt. Nancy “impeachment off the table” Pelosi and Harry “milquetoast, thumb up his butt” Reid are the two most glaring examples of why King George gets what he wants every time.
The Democrats have always been active accomplices in this illegal and undeclared war against an enemy who never existed. The supposed mandate Democrats received from voters only sheds light on the fact that the Democrats are willing and active accomplices in George’s war. Blaming that imbecile spoiled brat president we didn’t elect and ignoring the ongoing misdeeds of the Democratic majority is really stupid the first few times but soon rises to the level of true insanity. And yes, winging our hands and whining meekly and politely while children are dying is both insane and despicable.
Marie isn’t all wrong but the problem isn’t a lack of moderate (whatever the hell that’s supposed to be) Republicans, it’s an abundance of high-ranking Democrats who have no problem at all with killing hundreds of thousands of innocent people and putting working Americans in debt for the foreseeable future.
Report thisBy gronamox, October 2, 2007 at 7:29 am #
Is it possible to disengage from the South. They wanted to secede from the Union before, and many still do. So why don’t we let them. Then we can be rid of the bible belt Republican fundamentalists and the idiot right wing and this country can be the democracy it was intended to be. The swing states should stay, but the rest who produce nothing and prevent any real improvement in this nation would be on their own.
Report thisBy david, October 2, 2007 at 6:45 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Bush will do exactly as he pleases. The Dems can’t stop him, the Repubs can’t stop him. He is in control of a nuclear army and won’t be satisfied until he nukes Iran. Face it folks, we now live in a facist dictatorship and there’s no going back. The USA is gone, replaced by The United Christian Homeland of America. Bow peasants!!!
Report thisBy mary, October 2, 2007 at 6:36 am #
The incredible damage to every gov agency over the last 7 years will take a very long time to sort out and correct. The fact that the voice of the majority can be thrown to the corner with no regard and little consequence is mind blowing. Maybe we better think about going into the streets, and it better be sooner than later. They can’t ignore us forever....
Report thisBy Tom Semioli, October 2, 2007 at 6:18 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
When are ya’ll gonna realize that there is no difference between the Dems and Republicans?
Report thisBy KISS, October 2, 2007 at 6:09 am #
The Bush-dogs are mainly to blame for this mess. Democrats do control the purse, and that is power. Without funding the government grinds to a halt. Small maintenance bills can go forward to sustain the troops and necessary components for home. It isn’t pretty and it is hurtful, but the blame can be squarely place on the republicans and during an election I doubt many repugs are going to take a chance of being blamed for the mess congress will be in.
Report thisBut it take balls and so far the dimmos seem to be geldings. Pelosi is a champion of showing no backbone, and the same for Reid and his ilk.
By GW=MCHammered, October 2, 2007 at 6:08 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Republicans are still running things because K-street said so. After all, they are the shared pocket of our two-party rule.
I want to see on the ‘08 ballot a representation of true Democracy. I want to see a ballot for We The People to choose ‘Other Government Rule’. How about an option for Norway-like governing, rated the most peaceful country in the world with the highest quality of life among other firsts. Or Luxembourg-like order where the GDP runs 1.5 times the US. Maybe even Canada’s system where they are rated the most educated in the world with the ninth highest life expectancy.
Or we can stay with government that produces the second highest prison population rate, just behind Russia. Breeds a society that is the largest importer of illegal drugs. Ranks the highest by far in obesity rates. And produces graduates that, as director Ken Burns recently stated, more than half think we fought the Russians in WWII alongside Nazi Germany.
Just seems we could do better.
Report thisBy ocjim, October 2, 2007 at 5:37 am #
What I am hearing and what we have all chanted over the years is that our system doesn’t work. A majority vote can be ignored by the radical right. The rabid and inflexible right tend to dominate in spite of the plurality of reasonable people in our country. The radical and inflexible right stole the election in 2000 through a conservative Supreme Court vote, even though the people voted for Gore. The radical and inflexible right keeps us in the Iraq quagmire. The radical and inflexible right shuns the needs of children. These lunatic conservatives are hard to remove because of gerrymandering and the influence of money.
Reform (campaign finance reform, eliminating the electoral college system, universal health care) can’t happen because of the self interest of those who don’t represent our interests. We allowed BushCo to twist and use our system, requiring its repair. Are we going to have to take to the streets to see democracy flourish?
Report this