LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.   Support Truthdig - Help us give you more
February 9, 2010
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

The Terror-Industrial Complex

Kidnapping Is Not Charity

Sarah Palin's Cheat Sheet

Palin Calls Global Warming Research 'Snake Oil Science'

Soldier Accused of Waterboarding 4-Year-Old Daughter

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * Kidnapping Is Not Charity
A Victim, After All

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Reports

Affirmative Dissatisfaction

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Oct 2, 2007

By Eugene Robinson

WASHINGTON—I believe in affirmative action, but I have to acknowledge that there are arguments against it. One of the more cogent is the presence of Justice Clarence Thomas on the U.S. Supreme Court.

    If you caught Thomas on “60 Minutes” Sunday night, you know that he will probably consider me one of the many people who want to see him “destroyed” because he doesn’t “follow in this cult-like way something that blacks are supposed to believe.” That’s what he told CBS correspondent Steve Kroft—that he’d been persecuted for “veering away from the black gospel that we’re supposed to adhere to.”

    The up-close-and-personal “60 Minutes” piece, timed to coincide with publication of Thomas’ autobiography, was compelling television. It was also a useful reminder that whenever my Bush Derangement Syndrome flares up to the point where I’m actually feeling nostalgic for the days when George Bush the Elder was in the White House, I need only recall that it was Poppy who put Thomas on the court. That snaps me back to my senses. Thomas is only 59; we’ll be saddled with him, and that gigantic chip on his shoulder, for decades to come.

    Thomas said in the interview that the scorched-earth battle over his confirmation wasn’t really about him, it was about abortion. Yet at other points he made clear that the whole thing was about him, specifically his commission of the ultimate sin: He is a (drum roll, please) black conservative. Cover the children’s ears.

    “I’m black,” he told Kroft. “So I’m supposed to think a certain way. I’m supposed to have certain opinions. I don’t do that. You don’t create a box and put people in and then make a lot of generalizations about them.”

Advertisement

    Enough with the violins. When Fox News bloviator Bill O’Reilly says that African-Americans are “finally” beginning to “think for themselves,” I chalk it up to the fact that his germane experience with black people is probably limited to that recent dinner he had with the Rev. Al Sharpton and a room full of shockingly well-behaved patrons at Sylvia’s, the Harlem soul-food shrine. But Thomas should know better. Either he’s being disingenuous or he has a persecution complex of Norse-saga proportions. 

    There are, as he ought to know, plenty of black conservatives. There are plenty of African-American parents teaching their children the same lessons of hard work and self-reliance that Thomas’ grandfather taught him. The black church, I would argue, is one of the more socially conservative major institutions in the nation.

    Black America has never been monolithic in its views, but black Americans do vote almost monolithically for Democrats. That wouldn’t necessarily be the case if Richard Nixon hadn’t built an electoral strategy on a race-based appeal to Southern whites—and if every Republican presidential candidate and party leader since Nixon hadn’t followed suit. Just last week, the four leading contenders for the Republican nomination all skipped a forum at historically black Morgan State University. As long as snubbing black voters is seen as smart politics in the Republican Party, black conservatives have good reason to stick with the Democrats.

    Back to affirmative action, which Thomas famously opposes: He was 43 and had one year of judicial experience when Bush the Elder nominated him to replace Thurgood Marshall on the court. Even Thomas can’t seriously believe Bush’s claim that he was the “most qualified” candidate.

    In the interview with Kroft, Thomas spoke of his experience at Yale Law School, which set aside a number of slots for minority students. He said he sees his Yale law degree as “tainted,” worth less than a white student’s degree.

    This is why some critics have described Thomas as self-loathing—not because he holds conservative political views or because he’s a Republican, not because he objects in principle to affirmative action, but because he so discounts his own achievement. All Yale gave Thomas was the opportunity; he had to earn the degree. Yet he overlooks his own brains and hard work.

    Thomas resents the fact that he couldn’t get a job despite graduating in the middle of his class. Maybe prospective employers thought his white classmates were smarter, or maybe they just didn’t want to hire a black man. But even if the whole world undervalued Clarence Thomas, why does he so undervalue himself that he keeps his law diploma in the basement with a “15 cents” sticker on the frame? 

    Thomas really should work these issues out for himself. Instead, he seems to be doing his best to save future generations of disadvantaged minorities from the indignity and shame of a Yale law degree.
   
    Eugene Robinson’s e-mail address is eugenerobinson(at)washpost.com.
   
    © 2007, Washington Post Writers Group


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By thomas billis, October 5, 2007 at 7:09 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Clarence Thomas does not have to swallow any dogma whole.You would think his circumstance and the help he received that he so richly deserved would not have him embracing Antonin Scalias view of the world either.He is a strict constructionist I guess he wants to go back to when the Constitution was written.Back then cotton pickers did not go to Yale with help or without.He could be right that some of the contention about his confimation was about abortion.As I recall he was the only person in America who never had a conversation about Roe Vs Wade and he was in Law School.Before we charge Anita Hill with lying Mr Thomas should we not own up for our own lies.He could not get a job graduating Yale Law in the middle of the pack and Sandra Day O Conner graduating 2nd from Stanford law was only able to get a job as legal secretary.Things have changed Mr Thomas for the better no thanks to you.P.S.George Bush graduated from Yale and Clarence Thomas graduated from Yale Law a sad commentary on an Ivy League institution.

Report this

By Outraged, October 3, 2007 at 8:57 pm #

That’s what happens when you allow the depravity which is currently called “conservatism” or at times republicanism to invade your mind.  Right away he turns into a poor whining a**hole who can’t leave his secretary alone.  Poor baby…  Clarence, if it’s so goddamn bad get out of it, remove yourself from the bar assoc. and put your application in at McD’s.

Report this

By ldog25, October 3, 2007 at 1:26 pm #

Do you think Bush treats his Yale degree the same way (as Thomas does his Yale law degree), because he was admitted as the child of a alumnus?

Robinson is absolutely correct is assessing the source of Thomas’ self-loathing.  Rich whites lose absolutely no sleep in gaining advantages over others simply by the circumstances of their birth, because they can then justify the gains made by those advantages as being the product of their own hard work.

Whether Thomas likes it or not, he earned that Yale law degree.  It’s what he has produced in the last 16+ years that makes people question his judgment.

Report this

By driving bear, October 3, 2007 at 12:13 am #

At last a black person who understands that liberalism is more dangerous to blacks than the KKK.
America needs more black leaders like C. Thomas

Report this

By DavidH, October 2, 2007 at 2:30 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

It is high time for His Honor Clarence Thomas to listen to the advice of Sly Stone:

“Stand! You’ve been sitting much too long: there’s a permanent crease in your right and wrong.”

Report this

By mary, October 2, 2007 at 11:06 am #

Eventhough Clarence Thomas is indeed a sad figure, it is the immeasurable damage he can do.  There needs to be a better confirmation system.  This is why we need term limits, even for the Supreme Court….

Report this

By KISS, October 2, 2007 at 10:22 am #

Thomas is an aberration onto himself. He used affirmative action for himself and now wishes to exclude it for the other Blacks following in his foot-steps. His single minded focus on sex and his self-degradation shows, not only his self disdain and mental instability. How quick he is in downgrading his Black Brothers and Sisters.
I have no desire to read his rants and ravings in print, nor do I waste my time seeing him on the teley.
59 years old and no way to alleviate this runt-minded ,pardon the expression, justice. How truly sad.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2010 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.