![]() ![]() |
![]() |
| |
|
Lord of the SighsPosted on Sep 27, 2007WASHINGTON—When they write the cultural history of childhood in 21st- century America, I hope they leave room for a few unkind words about “Kid Nation.” CBS’ latest new reality show—that wonderful oxymoron—is about 40 kids from 8 to 15 years old who are dropped into a ghost town in New Mexico with only a production crew to call their own. The kids’ task, we are told in the best go-team fashion, is to “try to fix their forefathers’ mistakes and build a new town that works.” Their real job, of course, is to attract viewers who want to see what happens to the “first ever kid nation.” Will kids left to their own devices create a democratic idyll or a savage anarchy? There is nothing particularly new about the conflicting images of children as innocents and children as beasts. It’s as old as mythology. It lives on in the heart of every parent who’s seen her child turn from a screaming sociopath at the supermarket checkout to a philosopher king at the beach: “Who painted the sky blue?” But the real founding fathers of “Kid Nation” leave little to chance or choice. It’s the producers, not the so-called “pioneers,” who determine the structure of the town called Bonanza. It’s the adults who lay the cultural grid down the main street. And this makes “Kid Nation” an entry into the annals of childhood as it’s now lived and argued about in America. You see, this is what the adults brought with them from Hollywood to Bonanza: competition, class and consumerism. In the very first episode, the children were directed to form four armies for color war. And they did. They were told that victory would determine their class status. And it did. In a scenario Karl Marx couldn’t have made up, the winners of the war were dubbed “upper class,” the runners-up were labeled “merchants,” then “cooks,” and finally “laborers.” The little capitalists were allowed to use their very unequal paychecks for very unequal chores to pay for goodies at the town store. The producers did everything but deny the lower income children their health coverage. Cutthroat competition, class divisions, unrelenting consumerism. Maybe it is reality programming after all. Aren’t these the basic three C’s of the culture in which we are all raising children? Parent bashing is the favorite indoor sport these days. It’s behind the voyeurism that makes “Supernanny” popular and Britney Spears unpopular. It’s why we cheered the judge assigning the sinking celebrity a parenting coach. Ordinary parents are held responsible for protecting their children from every imaginable danger. They are fed a high-anxiety diet of horror stories about lead paint in toys, Crocs on escalators and killer cribs. If you google “danger” and “children,” you get 21 million hits of everything from online predators to takeout junk food. Yet even the most watchful parents are not immune to criticism. The latest villains are the helicopter parents. See them hover over their children’s lives! Watch them pull the invisible apron strings of a cell phone, book their children’s playdates and write their college entrance essays while squashing their sense of imagination. Parents even have to protect kids from overprotection. The back story is that America has privatized child-raising. We regard children as the wholly owned subsidiary and responsibility of their families. Parents, in turn, can become so absorbed in worrying about the side rails on cribs that we lose focus on the cultural environment that encases all of us. And there is no bike helmet that can protect our children’s brains from the three C’s. Before it premiered, “Kid Nation” itself was charged with endangering the children by violating child labor laws and even child abuse laws. Indeed, the consent form that the parents signed is as creepy as the ones you don’t read before you go into surgery. Even creepier was the scene when two homesick children cried and not one adult had the impulse to drop a camera and offer comfort. Nevertheless, the real trouble in Bonanza is not that the cast of mini-survivors was exposed to “serious bodily injury, illness or death.” It’s that the children urged to build a better town (read “world") than their forefathers were manipulated into the copycat media culture. The reward is a gold star literally worth its weight in gold: $20,000.
The only hero so far is 8-year-old Jimmy, the New Hampshire boy who had the good sense to go home. As for the rest? The children of Bonanza didn’t make the rules. They inherited them. It’s not a kid nation. It’s our nation.
Previous item: Global Consensus, Not Global Conquest Next item: How to Deal With Iran Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment |
By dissenter, October 5, 2007 at 10:12 pm #
Thank you, Ellen Goodman, for writing about this horrible “reality” TV show, for the exploitative, abusive CRAP that it is...what kind of “reality” abandons children to their own devices? In my opinion this tv show, Kid Nation, is pure child abuse. Yes, the boy who went home right at the start had it right, is more mature than the rest, or perhaps the most courageous, who spoke up in his own defence and went home to his parents where children belong, with the leadership and loving care that parents are supposed to provide.
Report thisthe very concept of a “kid nation” is inhuman and retrogressive. it’s also insulting to kids like the ones who are truly parentless, like children in aids stricken communities in africa, who have to fend for themselves, without adult guidance because their parents and other adult community members have died, well, only in America the Good, can people indulge themselves in this ridiculous game of “playing” at having a bunch of parentless kids duking it out in the wilderness.
By rokky, October 3, 2007 at 7:01 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Thank you, thank you, thank you for running a story on that vile TV show. If you could sum up a few of the more negative points about our culture, that show would hit most of them.
Report thisBy rhbee, October 3, 2007 at 6:56 am #
Have not watched the show. Don’t watch any reality tv since I can’t stand the idea of it. If I want reality all I have to do is look in the mirror or out the window. It isn’t a show. I hate the fact that we are encouraged to be voyeurs of “reality”. A made up reality that is controlled by the marketeers who really just want us to continue consuming. I am however encouraged somewhat by the comments above as they point out what we should always remember - you don’t always get what you ask for. That’s the real reality.
Report thisBy Robert, September 29, 2007 at 1:56 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Everything Ellen Goodman states about the structure of the show is true, but I did not take away the messages she has. I have enjoyed the commentary it makes on the failings of class structure, and in general have found the children remarkable. For two consecutive weeks some of the brightest and most honest children have been placed at the lowest social rung-- most work/lowest pay. This is not overlooked by the children or the viewers.
In the United States, after one week, a group of children almost unanimously chose “more out-houses” over a color TV. That alone is a worthy accomplishment.
Report thisBy weather, September 27, 2007 at 9:53 am #
Bingo Ellen Goodman - you found television’s teething ring, Ugly isn’t it?
Report thisThank you, you said alot.