![]() ![]() |
![]() |
| |
|
Global Consensus, Not Global ConquestPosted on Sep 25, 2007By Amy Goodman As world leaders gather this week to address the United Nations General Assembly, President Bush’s refusal to negotiate on the two key issues of our day—war and global warming—has been stunning. And the media haven’t helped. Focusing on whether Columbia University should have invited Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to speak, the Bush administration’s drumbeat for war with Iran goes unchallenged. Let this not be a reprise of the war on Iraq. Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan says in his new memoir: “I am saddened that it is politically inconvenient to acknowledge what everyone knows: The Iraq War is largely about oil.” I asked him to elaborate: “It’s clear to me that were there not the oil resources in Iraq, the whole picture of how that part of the Middle East developed would have been different.” It is an obvious point. It’s just too bad that he wasn’t willing to admit this before the invasion; his every utterance during his tenure at the Fed influenced decision-makers around the world, particularly in his own backyard at the White House. As Naomi Klein, the author of “The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism,” listened to Greenspan, she pointed out, “Under international law ... it is illegal to wage wars to gain access to other countries’, sovereign countries’, natural resources.” Which brings us to Iran, another oil-rich country. As with Iraq, the Bush administration doesn’t talk about Iran’s oil, but rather claims that Iran is developing a nuclear bomb. Sound familiar? The answer isn’t war; it’s diplomacy. Earlier this week, I spoke with one of Israel’s top political columnists, Akiva Eldar, with the Israeli newspaper Haaretz. He opposes an attack on Iran: “[T]he Middle East is going to be nuclearized in no time. I think that solution should be a regional agreement ... the Middle East should be nuclear-free, including Israel. I think this has to be part of an agreement.” The U.N. gathering of world leaders is an ideal moment to hammer out agreements like Eldar recommends, as it is to take on the other crisis fueled by oil: climate change. On the global-warming front, the opening of the U.N. General Assembly this week coincided with a major meeting on climate change, attended by more than 80 world leaders. As U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon kicked off the meeting, he said: “We hold the future in our hands. Together we must ensure that our grandchildren will not have to ask why we have failed to do the right things and left them to suffer the consequences. So let us send a clear and collective signal to people everywhere. Today, let the world know that you are ready to shoulder this responsibility and that you will address this challenge head-on.” Yvo de Boer, a top U.N. climate expert, said: “The United States is still the largest emitter worldwide of greenhouse gases. For that reason and for a number of others, the participation of the U.S. is essential.” Yet Bush did not participate in the global meeting. Instead, Bush is hosting an invitation-only gathering of “major economies” in Washington, D.C., to discuss voluntary caps on greenhouse gas emissions. This is simply not enough. Ban Ki-moon criticized the Bush meeting, saying, “The U.N. climate process is the appropriate forum for negotiating global action.” One of those leaders who came to address the U.N. General Assembly was Evo Morales, the first indigenous president of Bolivia. While the U.S. rarely looks south for leadership, Morales’ example is worth considering. He has restored diplomatic relations with Iran. Against tremendous internal opposition, he nationalized Bolivia’s natural gas fields, transforming the country’s economic stability, and, interestingly, enriching the very elite that originally criticized the move. (Contrast this with the U.S. pressuring the Iraqi parliament to pass an oil law that would virtually hand over control of Iraq’s oil to the major U.S. oil corporations.) President Morales told me: “Neither mother earth nor life are commodities. We are talking about a profound change of models and systems.”
The twin crises of war and climate change, inexorably linked by our thirst for oil, need a concerted global solution—one that won’t be obtained by cowboy diplomacy. The United States must pursue global consensus, not global conquest—before it is too late.
Previous item: Biden One-Ups Bush Next item: Lord of the Sighs Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.
By stilldancing, October 2, 2007 at 6:12 pm # My question is how to engage people in our every day lives in this conversation… I wear buttons, t-shirts etc… to try and spark conversations throughout the day. However… people mostly just avoid the subject: of war in Iraq, Iran; the loss of our basic civil rights. It’s like we all go home and write these comments, but what about in the real world… outside of organizing meetings and the obvious ways… We need some sort of secret handshake or something…
By thomas billis, September 26, 2007 at 4:57 pm # The great con is first our boys and girls will shed their blood for oil and then the oil companies will charge us a premium price for it to keep the profits in the billions.Of course with some magnamity they will offer a discount to Gold Star families.
By John Borowski, September 26, 2007 at 11:28 am # Although most central banks (Aka Federal Reserve in the US) are INDEPENDENT by law (Not governed by their respective governments) many current and former central bankers expect more, not less, pressure of the type that the French president, Nicolas Sarkozy, has exerted on the ECB (European Central Bank) to avoid raising interest rates and harming growth. The preceding is an excerpt from International Herald Tribune. It is amusing to see Bernanke wave the magic interest wand and 8 years of fraud, theft, exploitation, and chicanery are instantly wiped away in the stock market. Aren’t interest rates the thing that got us in the soup in the first place? (Better than “Alice in Wonderland”) The Federal Reserve controls our printing presses that print our money and own our money too, but not wanting to become ink-stained wretches, that job is delegated to the US Treasury. The INDEPENDENT central banks decide if interest rates are lowered or raised with little or no input from their respective governments. Interest rates have a salubrious or deleterious effect on the US economy. (More than you know) Interest rates however are futile if the corruption is too far advanced.
By Virginia from Virginia, September 26, 2007 at 10:40 am # Heeelp! Bush is planning his next war - war on IRAN! We must do what we can to stop his insanity. NOW. That familiar propaganda (read: lies) machine is working at full throttle. We’ve been down this road before. Remember? There is NO EVIDENCE that Iran engages in terrorism, is building nukes, is warring in Iraq. And just listen to the media and their parrotng Bush lies. Do you ever hear any facts? Bush is determined to strike Iran. But we must TRY to counter war with peace and propaganda with truth. Good Luck!
By Hank Van den Berg, September 26, 2007 at 5:48 am # The countries Bush is inviting to his bogus environmental meeting should refuse to attend. But I am not holding my breath. I expect most of the invitees to show up and effectively join Bush in his charade intended only to delay any meaningful action on climate change. I hope I am wrong. Add Your Comment |
COMMENT TOOLS:
Hide comments
Show comments
Comment on this article