![]() ![]() |
|
| |
|
Lebanese Government on Verge of CollapsePosted on Sep 21, 2007By Robert Fisk Originally printed in The Independent. Antoine Ghanem was an easy target. Few bodyguards, no one would think that a member of parliament who represented the Armenians of Lebanon was a target. The little street in which he lived—tall tower blocks, boutiques, flower shops, was not a place where you would try to kill an enemy of Syria—if he was an enemy of Syria—but Antoine was blasted to pieces in his car as he left his home yesterday evening. And that means there is one left in the government to make up the numbers. In other words, it only takes one more murder for the democratically elected government of Lebanon to fall. Only a few weeks ago, Walid Jumblatt called me after Ghanem’s predecessor was murdered. “Two more to go, Robert,” Walid said. And so, tonight, it is one. To describe the tangled wreckage of the car bomb, the vile, obscene, traces of Mr Ghanem and his bodyguards, has become a kind of routine horror in Lebanon. Those of his cortege who did not die took me last night to the revolting remains of his death. Lebanon is not a democracy in our Western sense of the word. Nor, for that matter, is Israel. “Democracy”, as we like to call it in the West, does not sit easily in this part of the world. But Lebanese politicians—for the most part but not always, men, are brave folk—who know the cost of standing up for their country against its more powerful neighbours, be those neighbours Israel or Syria. There will be few in this country last night—and today—and tomorrow—who will not see Ghanem’s murder as another attempt by the Syrians to destroy any form of freedom in this little country. There will be equally little proof that shows Syria to blame. The French President, Nicolas Sarkozy—not to mention Gordon Brown—will not “tut-tut” this outrageous killing, but it is only a few days before the Lebanese must vote for their next president, and now they will have one less member of parliament to vote for that president. And that is what yesterday’s massive car bomb was about. Mr Ghanem, who was a 60-year-old member of the right-wing Christian Phalange Party—founded in Lebanon when its leader, Pierre Gemayel, was inspired by the Nazi Olympics of 1936—was the eighth anti-Syrian politician murdered since 2005. His assassination occurred only six days before parliament in Beirut was to elect a new president. At least 22 people were wounded in the explosion of the bomb which killed him in the capital’s Sinal-Fil district. It appeared that the car bomb was detonated by remote control. Ghanem’s car was blown at least 150ft away by the explosion. One of the pro-government ministers, Ahmed Fatfat, later said that it was “clear that lawmakers from the majority party are being liquidated”. It was, he said, “The only regime that does not want presidential elections in Lebanon to be held. The only response to the crime should be for parliament to convene on 25 September and to elect the president. “Every member who does not take part would be a direct or indirect participant in the crime.” Lebanese parliamentarians, who now take part in a bidding for next month’s parliamentary elections, were outdone yesterday by the former president, Amin Gemayel, whose son was assassinated last year. “It’s no more a question of presidential elections,” he said. “It’s a question of the survival of this country and democracy in the country that’s at stake for the time being. This criminal act aims at undermining efforts paid by Syria and others to achieve Lebanese national accord.” Previous item: Agree to Agree Next item: Hillary Clinton Takes On Healthcare (Again) Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment |
By Douglas Chalmers, September 26, 2007 at 11:48 pm #
Engineered by Israel and the USA but blamed on Iran or Syria or little green men from Mars! So much for “the roadmap” in the M.East, uhh. Really, this is about control and the water and oil pipeline coming from Turkey to ISRAEL!!! Its Zionist expansionism at its worst - yet it will get worse.
Report thisBy FFURKS, September 26, 2007 at 1:58 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
“102692 by Jack on 9/26 at 6:26 am
In the true spirit of the “new” antisemitism any criticism of Israeli foreign policies or actions is immediately equated with anti semitism. Most people who are interested in and familiar with the issue distinguish very carefully between Jews, Israelis, Zionists, Likudniks, and the many other groups. The worst of the hard right wing Zionists are the ones always screaming antisemitism. Criticizing Israeli government actions is no more antisemitic than criticising Bush is anti American.”
....and so after all these years away from my summer camp in the Catskills… the same question again returns… Can an ethnic jew be “anti-semetic?” I do not approve of Israel’s foregin policy.. So Am I anti semetic?
Report thisBy Jack, September 26, 2007 at 6:26 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
In the true spirit of the “new” antisemitism any criticism of Israeli foreign policies or actions is immediately equated with anti semitism. Most people who are interested in and familiar with the issue distinguish very carefully between Jews, Israelis, Zionists, Likudniks, and the many other groups. The worst of the hard right wing Zionists are the ones always screaming antisemitism. Criticising Israeli government actions is no more antisemitic than criticising Bush is anti American.
Report thisBy Howard, September 25, 2007 at 7:07 am #
Certainly Israel wants a peaceful nation on its northern border....Lebanon was just like that for decades until the wrong element harrassed Israeli citizens. Only Syria and Iran are fomenting trouble there. INHERIT THE WIND has explained it better than I. Makes much sense.
If anything was self-evident its that the Syrians and Hezballah are been behind this assanination or the previous ones, it could not be more clearer.
Report thisAnd yet, to see some comments made here that it had to be the Israelis fault, (can you imagine such Nonsense)is obscene; because they left Lebanon a looong time ago. Next thing you know they will be blamed for causing the American Civil War !
By Outraged, September 24, 2007 at 9:27 pm #
RE: Inherit The Wind:
“Isn’t Israel more secure with a stable, moderate democratic government in Lebanon than civil war?”
Yes, it is, so why does Israel continue to create tensions between itself and Lebanon by occupying the Sheebaa Farms area?
-----
“Isn’t it in Israel’s interest to promote that government?”
Not if Israel’s TRUE goal is to occupy with the intent to acquire Lebanese land.
-----
“Hasn’t that been Israel’s policy for the last 30 or so years?”
What nations say and what they do are many times not the same. Israel’s actions have not followed their rhetoric. Don’t misunderstand, there may be many in Israel who do not agree with what their leaders have engaged in, however this does not change the facts. Just as in the U.S of A. many do not agree with the invasion of Iraq, nonetheless, this is what our leaders have done.
-----
“Isn’t just the OPPOSITE in Syria’s best interest?
Doesn’t a stable democracy threaten Syria?”
A truly stable democracy threatens NO ONE. This is why we see our civil rights demolished in order for our leaders who have become the aggressors to pursue their agenda.
Whether Syria or any other country for that matter, is doing the right or JUST thing, does not negate another country’s crimes. However, if one country consistently disregards another country’s sovereignty, retaliation will ensue. Israel has perpetrated this on Palestine as well as Lebanon.
-----
“Talk about living in a glass house!”
Thank you for the glass house, I’ll enjoy the short apparition.
-----
“You started off by misquoting and deliberately misinterpreting me, dragging in irrelevancies, ignoring obvious and critical facts, and then telling me to “wake up and smell the coffee” which, of course, implies that I’m an idiot.”
Sorry, if you felt that I thought you were an idiot. That in fact was not my intent. My intent and meaning by saying, “wake up and smell the coffee” was for you to recognize and address Israel’s shortcomings. In fact, illegalities. They are there and dismissing them does nothing to solve the fighting which has been going on for so long. So many innocent civilians have died, on both sides.
I am not, as you conclude an Israel hater, anti-Semite or a lover of either. I do not characterize an entire group of people by such absurd standards. I take each person as an individual, because in the end it’s always boils down to the integrity of the person in front of you. I care more about the loss of innocent life. Israel with the help of the U.S. has continued to agitate it’s neighbors. American tax dollars are contributing to the carnage in Palestine as well as in Iraq and I take ISSUE with that.
However, if as a group, we in America believe and support our democracy then so should we offer help and if that help would be accepted by the sovereign nations of Palestine and Israel, put our collective heads together and solve this thing. Ditto for Israel and Lebanon.
I do have one question though, Why do YOU defend Israel so vehemently? What is YOUR true agenda?
Also, I did not misquote you, drag in irrelevancies nor ignore obvious and critical facts such as you claim.
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, September 24, 2007 at 5:42 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
boggs on 9/24 at 12:53 pm
(128 comments total)
Of course the fall of the Lebanese gov’t would be exactly what Israel and the U.S want. They want to destabilize the entire middle east. This is their mission.
Divide and conquer one small country at a time. Thats why we sent all the bombs to Israel to be used in the thirty day war last spring against Lebanon. A pure power play against Lebanon for no reason.
We have been behind the displacement of the Palestinians all these 60 years.
But if you ask our gov’t officials we are the caretakers of the world. We are the nurturing country. We are the lords over humanity and democracy.
Anyone who isn’t blind can see plainly where Israel and the U.S. are trying to take us.
Posts like this flabbergast me because I cannot believe anyone could be so dense and blind. But I should expect it because it comes from people who think Jews are genetically evil and born with a desire to do mischief in their DNA, even if it gets them killed.
Since it has been Syria’s intent and purpose to de-stabilize Lebanon for 30 years, at least, how could it POSSIBLY be in Israel’s interest to give Syria what it wants? How could it POSSIBLY be in Israel’s interest to destabilize all her neighbors and try to battle them all into submission? Because if you believe that Israel wants to de-stabilize Lebanon, then the same logic would force you to conclude that Israel also wants to destabilize Jordan and Egypt, a conclusion that defies fact, actions and sanity.
No, the only logical path for Israel’s NATIONAL SECURITY is help moderate neighbors stay stable and peaceful so Israel can focus her efforts on her real enemy: Syria. Following the First Gulf War, Iraq was contained and eliminated as a threat. Iran is very far away and such threats are mostly noise. Eventually, sanity will break out in Iran and they’ll realize that the Shah, bastard that he was, was right: Israel IS Iran’s natural ally. Think about it (those of you who can).
The LAST thing Israel needs is trouble in Lebanon--while she’s struggling with the West Bank, Syria and Gaza. To say that Israel wants Lebanon as another danger zone ON HER BORDER, is simply moronic and typical of anti-semites--they will blame Jews for ANYTHING even if it makes no sense. In fact, the less sense the better because then OTHER people will say “who would say something so crazy if it wasn’t true?” Easy. A paranoid liar eager to spread what Geobbels called “The Big Lie”.
Report thisBy cyrena, September 24, 2007 at 3:07 pm #
#102281 by Inherit The Wind
• Even a monster like Saddam Hussein understood this--which is why he gave up his WMDs--having them was a bigger threat than not having them.
ITW, this is an interesting view on Saddams giving up of his WMD’s. I’m inclined to agree that it makes sense, (having them was a bigger threat than not having them). BUT, I’m just wondering if that was his sole reason. He’d actually given up that program back in the 90’s, but I always wondered if it might be because he just ran out of money to pursue it. (the sanctions and all). Because, as it’s turned out, the fact that he DIDN’T have them seems to be why the bush team was so willing to attack him. At least the conventional wisdom of the Middle Eastern mindset seems to believe that if a country is WITHOUT these nukes; that makes them prime targets for Dick Cheney, as in bullies rarely attack people that have the means to protect themselves. We haven’t seen them firing on China or Russia. Just a thought.
#102092 by Non Credo
• Actually, Cyrena, Israel never left Lebanon. They are still occupying the Shebaa farms area, and have been for many years.
You’re right Non Credo, and I actually knew this. (I’m particularly aware of the cluster/carpet bombs and bombletts that continue to explode all over the place). Israel says they aren’t “radio-active” though, so that must mean that it’s OK. They blow up children and other living beings, and will for decades to come, but at least they aren’t radio-active, eh?
Meantime, over HERE, we just toss those nukes around, and carry them between military bases, and through the skies, (the B-52 bomber nuclear warhead fiasco from last month) and don’t find out that we’ve had the entire world exposed to total annihilation (especially our own continent) until damn near two days into it.
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/092307C.shtml
But, let a kid walk into the Boston Airport with a computer gizmo attached to her shirt, and the authorities are prepared to shoot her dead. (nevermind the nukes that could have easily turned us into a Stephen King novel).
So, one just sort of has to ponder where we all are at this point.
Report thisBy boggs, September 24, 2007 at 12:53 pm #
Of course the fall of the Lebanese gov’t would be exactly what Israel and the U.S want. They want to destabilize the entire middle east. This is their mission.
Report thisDivide and conquer one small country at a time. Thats why we sent all the bombs to Israel to be used in the thirty day war last spring against Lebanon. A pure power play against Lebanon for no reason.
We have been behind the displacement of the Palestinians all these 60 years.
But if you ask our gov’t officials we are the caretakers of the world. We are the nurturing country. We are the lords over humanity and democracy.
Anyone who isn’t blind can see plainly where Israel and the U.S. are trying to take us.
By Inherit The Wind, September 24, 2007 at 12:31 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Outraged on 9/24 at 10:54 am
(202 comments total)
RE: #102281 by Inherit The Wind on 9/24
It’s too bad that your defense of Israel is supported only by name calling and incongruities. Otherwise, we could’ve had a valid debate. In order to gain a realistic view of any issue one must listen to several points of view and incorporate all facts currently known, some of which might not be flattering for one’s position.
******
Talk about living in a glass house! You started off by mis-quoting and deliberately mis-interpreting me, dragging in irrelevancies, ignoring obvious and critical facts, and then telling me to “wake up and smell the coffee” which, of course, implies that I’m an idiot.
Truthdig is FULL of characters like you--"debate" means you set the rules, you act as the umpire, and you fix the deck so you always “win”. It’s not debate--it’s simply a forum for your propaganda.
I swear, if someone’s kid gets a boil on his butt, people here swear it’s an Israeli plot and dig up “evidence” to “prove” it.
Report thisBy Outraged, September 24, 2007 at 10:54 am #
RE: #102281 by Inherit The Wind on 9/24
It’s too bad that your defense of Israel is supported only by name calling and incongruities. Otherwise, we could’ve had a valid debate. In order to gain a realistic view of any issue one must listen to several points of view and incorporate all facts currently known, some of which might not be flattering for one’s position.
Report thisBy Conservative Yankee, September 24, 2007 at 4:04 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
102228 by thomas billis on 9/23 at 4:44 pm
“If you chose to believe George Bush on the middle east that is your prerogative but I believe Jimmy Carter.”
I challenge you to cut&paste;one thing I have ever said that suggests I would “believe” ANY government official on ANY issue.
I saw what I saw… hard to color that. and on the 4000 Americans killed, you believe they are fighting and dying for a free and peaceful Lebanon?
Who sold you that bill-o-goods?
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, September 24, 2007 at 3:08 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
I find it strange that you would bring this up, as it is so OBVIOUS! Israel wants the REAL ESTATE that Lebanon and Palestine has, and in no uncertain terms has LET THAT BE KNOWN! What would Israel lose....not a frickin’ thing!
Wake up and smell the coffee.
******
Typical irrational Israel-hater.
Israel, like most nations, and most leaders, whether elected, king, or dictator, views its NATIONAL SECURITY above all. It acts to enhance that national security, and to ameliorate or eliminate threats to it. The fact that we, in the US, have for the first time a President with NO understanding of this is an oddity, not the norm.
Even a monster like Saddam Hussein understood this--which is why he gave up his WMDs--having them was a bigger threat than not having them.
Yet myopic conspiracy-plot types like you think Israel is insane, that she will put her national security at risk for expansion into Lebanon. And why is Israel willing to do this, according to you? Because Israel is evil and insanely expansionist.
Yet this doesn’t fit the facts. How Israel deals with the Palestinians, where they are justified and where they are not IN THE PALESTINIAN TERRITORIES is another issue. You like all the Israel haters, thinks Israel should react to kidnappings and rocket attacks by doing nothing--that they “deserve” it.
No nation tolerates that if they have the means to prevent or punish the perpetrators. And no, before you raise, I DON’T think Sharon was right in allowing the refugee camp massacre in 1982. I think he should have been punished for war crimes for that --I did then, and I do now. I believe it was DETRIMENTAL to Israeli national security and not punishing him was a mistake.
Of course, you didn’t and can’t answer the obvious questions:
Isn’t Israel more secure with a stable, moderate democratic government in Lebanon than civil war? Isn’t it in Israel’s interest to promote that government?
Hasn’t that been Israel’s policy for the last 30 or so years?
Isn’t just the OPPOSITE in Syria’s best interest?
Doesn’t a stable democracy threaten Syria?
Hasn’t Syria’s policy for the last 30 years to insert, instead, a puppet government dependent on Syria?
I’m not the one not smelling the coffee.
Report thisBy Outraged, September 23, 2007 at 8:31 pm #
RE: #102154 by Inherit The Wind on 9/23
“Yet all you anti-Semites INSIST that Israel MUST be engaging in such a self-destructive and suicidal policy. Why? Because you believe GestapoShit’s nazi propaganda that all Jews are the spawn of Satan?”
Inherit the Wind:
Don’t give us this illogical and undeserved “anti-Semites” barrage. It’s utterly ridiculous. I won’t speak for anyone else here but I for one INSIST that Israel explain itself. Israel’s tactics for 40 yrs. of illegal occupation of Palestine and the “occupied territories” is outrageous! They are breaking international LAW. I don’t give a rat’s ass what denomination they happen to be. That does not give them carte blanc to do as they please. They are hiding behind religion and using it as a tactic. I’m quite confident that religion is just a usable form of fictitious piety the “crooks in charge” USE to justify they’re means. Their crimes against the Palestinian people are only akin to the crimes in the Warsaw Ghetto.
You also state:
“If you TRULY are rational and logical, then use your gray cells and ask what could Israel gain, and more importantly, what would she lose”
I find it strange that you would bring this up, as it is so OBVIOUS! Israel wants the REAL ESTATE that Lebanon and Palestine has, and in no uncertain terms has LET THAT BE KNOWN! What would Israel lose....not a frickin’ thing!
Wake up and smell the coffee.
Report thisBy thomas billis, September 23, 2007 at 4:44 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
To conservative yankee yes like I said there was always a mess there.But 4000 Americans were not dead with no end in sight.Through the deats previously Egypt negotiated a peace with Israel.Jordan negotiated a peace with Israel.With eight years of Clinton there was a hope of an accord between the Jews and the Palestinians.Where do you see any hope now?Which country will follow Egypt and Jordan and attempt to make peace with Israel.When we moved away from talking to shooting we killed all hope that we could remain a semi honest broker.I know people hate it but read what Jimmy Carter says the Israelis have done to the Palestinians with the approval of George Bush.If you chose to believe George Bush on the middle east that is your prerogative but I believe Jimmy Carter.
Report thisBy weather, September 23, 2007 at 2:49 pm #
Israel’s first lesson in sign language?
1.)Finger pointing:never leave the scene of a crime w/out it.
Report thisBy Gregg Gordon, September 23, 2007 at 10:55 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Yes, Charles, everyone “knows” but no one has evidence. That’s all Fisk said. I don’t think passing on bar talk qualifies as good journalism.
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, September 23, 2007 at 6:07 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Every time Lebanon comes close to getting a rational democratic government, some key member of it is murdered, going back to the Gemayel brothers.
Such a government in Lebanon is clearly and obviously in Israel’s best interest, and civil war and unrest is a threat. Yes, Israel wants to destroy the radicals in Lebanon--their Bush-inspired weird foray last year was part of that. Why wouldn’t they? My ONLY question about that exercise is how they could have planned and executed it so badly--as if Rumsfeld, Cheney and Bush had planned it for them.
Yet the anti-semitic conspiracy shit-heads here INSIST that Israel and Mossad MUST be behind these killings. It makes no god-damn sense, whereas it is TOTALLY consistent for Syria and Iran to be behind such killings as THOSE states are TOTALLY interested in disrupting democracy in Lebanon.
Naturally. If Democracy succeeds in Lebanon, Syrians are going to say: “Hey! We don’t need the shithead Assads--we can have a peaceful, stable nation with FREEDOM!” And so it needs to be crushed.
Yet for Israel a moderate, stable democracy on their border is one less thing to worry about. Only a madman would want otherwise.
Yet all you anti-semites INSIST that Israel MUST be engaging in such a self-destructive and suicidal policy. Why? Because you believe GestapoShit’s nazi propaganda that all Jews are the spawn of Satan? Or the Arab Fundamentalist bloggers who say the same thing?
If you TRULY are rational and logical, then use your gray cells and ask what could Israel gain, and more importantly, what would she lose by such de-stabilizing tactics? Ask yourself: Was the invasion a deliberate attempt to discredit the government, or a desperate attempt to stop what that government cannot stop?
But this idea that all Israelis are inherently evil, power-hungry, insane and irrational is the ONLY way you can explain such actions. If you grant that Israeli leadership is rational, even if you believe them evil and power-hungry, such actions make no sense. They aren’t rational.
Report thisBy Conservative Yankee, September 23, 2007 at 5:08 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
102133 by thomas billis on 9/23 at 2:34 am
“But until the chimp got into office it was never this bad.”
Either you are young, or you have forgotten. I remember watching the bombing of Lebanon in the Sixties when it was a battleground. The TV had pictures of the “Holiday Inn” Beirut burning from the upper stories. Than there was the Seventies with a car bomb a day for several years. then there was the 80’s when we lost a number of our troops in a garage, and Reagan answered by calling the rest of our forces home. Lebanon has been a seething cauldron since.
US policy failures in this region are best summed by an inexact quote I heard from Gore Vidal some years ago: “The USA is too small, too young, and too impatient to be a superpower.”
Report thisBy thomas billis, September 23, 2007 at 2:34 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
The middle east has always been a mess but when the gasoline of a moron in the White House it is ready to come apart.You could get lost in the minutiae of Hezbollah and the civil war and a mllion other constant irritants in the middle east.But until the chimp got into office it was never this bad.There was the close call peace treaty with Arafat and Clinton and then Zippy took over the White House and decided that talking to Syria and Iran was that wimps Bill Clintons way of dealing with these guys.Well that change in stategy by this monkey has caused more unease in that region than at any time in my lifetime and that includes two wars there.If you do not talk to the Syrians and the Iranians the ones pulling strings there you are never going to effectively attack the problem.You will keep going after the symptons and never bring the disease under control.This is all that rapture bullshit.You know all those morons you see on the street who say the war will end on such and such a date well one of those guys is in the White House making policy.
Report thisBy Charles Barton, September 23, 2007 at 1:24 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Why is it that the only people in the world who do not know that the Syrians are trying through use of assassination to bring down the anti-Syrian government of Lebanon. is Robert Fisk and and the truthdig readers?
This is from The Daily Star of Lebonan report about Antoine Ghanem’s funeral:
“Syria and its friends are behind all these crimes,” said Tharwat Abu Salim, a [Walid] Jumblatt supporter who along with hundreds of others came from the Chouf in a bus.
Even in the Beirut bar where Fisk hangs out they talk about this, so what is the great one trying to hide? Fisk along with numerous ignorant truthdig readers are so consumed with hate for Israel that they are willing to protect Syria in order to promote hate for Israel. Everyone in Lebanon knows that Israel and the Mossad had nothing to do with Antoine Ghanem assination. Every story from Lebanon about Ghanem’s assination talks about Syrian involvement. Everyone in Lebanon knows that if the current government falls through assassinations, Hezbollah will gain power and invite the Syrians back into Lebanon. Everyone in Lebanon knows that that is the deal between Syrua and Hezbollah. But Robert Fisk is so consumed with displaying his hate for Israel, he is oblivious to the obvious.
Report thisBy Outraged, September 22, 2007 at 9:51 pm #
Great points Non Credo and Cyrena.
RE: #101983 by Howard on 9/22
This documentary gives a more balanced and realistic view of Israel and US involvement there. It’s called: Peace, Propaganda and the Promised Land.
http://getintheirface.blogspot.com/2006/07/peace-propa ganda-promised-land.html
Remember Howard, many times but not always, what someone doesn’t tell you is much more important than what they do tell you.
Report thisBy cyrena, September 22, 2007 at 5:06 pm #
#101983 by Howard
....’And yet, to see some comments made here that it had to be the Israelis fault, (can you imagine such Nonsense)is obsecene; because they left Lebanon a looong time ago. Next thing you know they will be blamed for causing the American Civil War !’
Howard,
Just curious on how you count ‘time’ as in Israel left Lebanon loooong time ago. Is last summer a looong time ago?
My guess would be that Israel has NEVER left Lebanon, or any other nation state in the Middle East. Now granted, they may have been FORCED to leave, had they not been receiving such overwhelming assistance from the US for so long, because it may have been more difficult for them to sustain the 60 year old slaughter, without the sometimes direct, and sometimes indirect assistance of the US. But, that has never completely STOPPED Israel’s reign of terror over the past 60 years.
So here again, we have to be careful about cherry-picking history. It never helps to re-write history, even though I know it makes it easier for a large portions of society to ignore the ugly parts.
Report thisBy felicity, September 22, 2007 at 9:19 am #
#101983
Syria, Mossad - no one knows. Mossad is a legitimate ‘branch’ of the Israeli government and to deny its presence in the world is like denying the presence of the CIA or M16...Its Special Operations Division is involved in assassinations - many of which it has carried out - paramilitary operations, sabotage and psychological warfare.
To assume that Mossad - or Syrian spy rings - are not operating in Lebanon is naive.
Report thisBy Howard, September 22, 2007 at 8:34 am #
If anything was self-evident that the Syrians and Hezballah is been behind this assanination or the previous ones, it could not be more clearer.
Report thisAnd yet, to see some comments made here that it had to be the Israelis fault, (can you imagine such Nonsense)is obsecene; because they left Lebanon a looong time ago. Next thing you know they will be blamed for causing the American Civil War !
By Conservative Yankee, September 22, 2007 at 7:55 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Once, back in the 1950’s my father took me to Beirut. A gleaming jewel on the shore of the Mediterranean. The warm breeze from the west blew through our non-air conditioned hotel rooms, sweet and unpolluted. The Lebanese people were friendly and many of them spoke English. During our journey to Ramallah it was not uncommon for folks, who did not know us, to wave and smile. I grieve for that part of the world knowing that there’s not a damn thing I can do to make anything there better.
Report thisBy oldgeezerpilot, September 22, 2007 at 7:45 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
TAMARLAIN, I cannot imagine your characterization of the disastrous 2006 Lebanon war as having been a “victory” for Israel. Their BushWar style aerial campaign made Nasrallah into a rock-star.
Hizbollah still has rockets that can hit Israel and throw it into chaos. And Syria is still the conduit for weapons to Lebanon.
Israel has destroyed everything south of the Litani River. What did that accomplish?
About the only “victory” Israel achieved was to prove to the (arab) world that it is armed and crazy - not to be messed with.
Terrific.
Report thisBy Fools on the Hill, September 22, 2007 at 5:35 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
The bombing of Lebanon is part of a carefully planned and coordinated military road map. The extension of the war into Syria and Iran has already been contemplated by US and Israeli military planners. This broader military agenda is intimately related to strategic oil and oil pipelines. It is supported by the Western oil giants which control the pipeline corridors. In the context of the war on Lebanon, it seeks Israeli territorial control over the East Mediterranean coastline.
Report thisBy TAMARLAIN, September 22, 2007 at 4:09 am #
I’D BET LEBANON STARTED IT’S COLLAPSE AFTER THE ISRAEL UNDERTOOK TO WAGE A 35-DAY TERROR CAMPAIGN AGAINST LEBANON TO SET IT BACK A FEW DECADES, IN THE WORDS OF ONE OF THE WAR CRIMINAL ISRAELI GENERALS WHO ORCHESTRATED THE TERROR ATTACK. BUSH GREENLIGHTED THE ISRAELI WAR PLANS MONTHS BEFORE ISRAEL COULD TACTICALLY CARRY-OUT IT’S DEMOLITION OF THE CEDAR REVOLUTION THAT BUSH WAS BRAYING WAS A DIRECT RESULT OF HIS IRAQ WAR.
BUSH AND THE ISRAELIS ARE ALSO CO-ORDINATING THEIR EFFORTS TO CONTINUE GAZA AS THE LARGEST CONCENTRATION CAMP IN HISTORY. BUSH HAS THROUGHLY ADOPTED SHARON’S ‘RULE THROUGH CHAOS’ DOCTRINE. JUST AS THE ISRAELIS NURTURED HAMAS, BUSH TOOK THE ‘SALVADOR OPTION’ AND SET-UP SHIA DEATH SQUADS AND IS ALSO SUPPORTING SUNNI JIHADIST GROUPS AFFILIATED WITH AL QAEDA THAT SAUDI PRINCE BANDOR VETS AS HATING SHIA AND PERSIANS MORE THAN AMERICANS.
Report thisBy cyrena, September 22, 2007 at 1:41 am #
#101868 by farmertx on 9/21 at 4:45 pm
..."Shrub is too busy trying to figure out how the Hunts did an end run and signed the contract. (Maybe the check bounced?)"…
FarmerTx,
I’m gonna have to start calling you Shrubs greatest fan. You’re one of the very few who actually believe that he has anything to do with anything. As if he would even attempt to “figure” anything out. He’s totally incapable of that.
Actually FarmerTx, I don’t believe that the Boy can even manage to dress or bathe himself unassisted.
He’s just just not there. It’s all a cruel joke.
Meantime, the “source of conflict” in the Middle East is Israel. Period, dot, end of that conversation. Unfortunately, that is the SAME “source of conflict” that we have here now, since we have interfered in that conflict, on behalf of Israel.
To “hope” that “we” would just let them sort out their own mess is an oxymoron, seeing as how WE have caused it. OF COURSE they can sort it out, if we weren’t there to cause it to begin with. They’d even have a real good shot at it, if we quit supplying all the firepower and BILLIONS for Israel to continue their 60-year reign of terror.
Report thisBy farmertx, September 21, 2007 at 4:45 pm #
Seems like Syria has always been a source for friction and warfare in the Mideast. Hopefully, the Mideast will be left to sort out the mess amongst themselves.Evidently neither Syria nor Lebanon have that much oil reserves, or the Shootist would be sending a Blackwater clone in to save the day.
Report thisShrub is too busy trying to figure out how the Hunts did an end run and signed the contract. (Maybe the check bounced?)